European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
01
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
1-8
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
03 January 2025
ACCEPTED
02 February 2025
PUBLISHED
01 March 2025
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue03 2025
CITATION
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Assessing the Impact of
Community Engagement,
Technology, And Policy
Enforcement on Marine
Environmental Protection
Mei Hua Liu
Department of Ocean Engineering, Dalian University of Technology,
Dalian, Liaoning, China
Abstract:
Marine environmental protection is essential
for preserving biodiversity, ecosystem services, and the
overall health of oceanic systems. As threats such as
pollution, overfishing, and climate change continue to
affect marine environments, innovative approaches are
critical for mitigating these impacts. This study
investigates three major approaches to marine
environmental protection: community engagement, the
use of technology, and the enforcement of policies. The
research utilizes a mixed-methods approach, including
surveys, interviews, and case studies from different
coastal regions. The findings suggest that when
community engagement is combined with technological
tools and robust policy enforcement, marine
conservation efforts become more effective and
sustainable. This study highlights the importance of
interdisciplinary
collaboration
and
integrated
approaches
in
achieving
long-term
marine
environmental protection.
Keywords:
Marine
environmental
protection,
community
engagement,
technology,
policy
enforcement, marine conservation, sustainability.
Introduction:
The world’s oceans face a growing
number of environmental challenges, ranging from
pollution and habitat destruction to the effects of
climate change and overfishing. The health of marine
ecosystems is crucial, not only for biodiversity but also
for human livelihoods, as oceans provide food,
recreational opportunities, and contribute significantly
to global climate regulation. As these environmental
threats continue to escalate, it has become evident that
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
2
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
traditional conservation efforts alone are insufficient
to safeguard marine resources. Innovative approaches
that incorporate community engagement, technology,
and policy enforcement are increasingly seen as key to
achieving effective marine environmental protection.
Community engagement is one of the most powerful
tools for fostering sustainable marine practices, as
local populations often have the most immediate
connection
to
and
dependency
on
marine
environments.
Research
suggests
that
when
communities are actively involved in environmental
decision-making and conservation practices, there is a
higher likelihood of success in achieving long-term
sustainability goals (Berkes, 2009). Technology also
plays a vital role, offering new tools for monitoring
marine ecosystems, detecting pollutants, and
improving conservation management. Additionally,
policy enforcement remains a crucial element in
ensuring compliance with environmental regulations,
as effective enforcement can act as a deterrent to
harmful practices and ensure accountability.
This study explores the effectiveness of these three
approaches
—
community engagement, technology,
and policy enforcement
—
in the protection of marine
environments. Specifically, it assesses how they
interact and influence each other in achieving marine
conservation objectives.
METHODS
This study employed a mixed-methods approach to
assess the impact of community engagement,
technology, and policy enforcement on marine
environmental protection. The aim was to capture
both quantitative and qualitative data to understand
the dynamics of these three key elements in marine
conservation. Below is a detailed description of the
study design, participant selection, data collection
techniques, and data analysis methods.
Study Design
The research utilized a combination of case study
analysis, surveys, and interviews to assess how
community engagement, technology, and policy
enforcement contribute to marine environmental
protection. By comparing multiple regions with varying
degrees of success in implementing these approaches,
the study aimed to identify patterns and correlations
that could help inform future conservation strategies.
Study Areas
The study was conducted in four geographically
diverse regions that have implemented various marine
protection initiatives. These regions were selected
based on their differences in approaches to marine
conservation, allowing for comparative analysis:
•
Region 1: Southeast Asia (Philippines) - Known
for community-driven conservation efforts and marine
protected areas (MPAs).
•
Region 2: North America (Coastal U.S. -
California) - Characterized by advanced technological
interventions in marine monitoring and regulatory
enforcement.
•
Region 3: Mediterranean (Greece) - Features a
combination of technology use and policy enforcement,
along with some community involvement in
management.
•
Region 4: Northern Europe (Norway) - Primarily
focused on strong policy enforcement and the
integration of digital tools in marine protection.
Participants
The study involved key stakeholders from each region to
gain diverse perspectives on marine conservation. A
total of 150 participants were selected, including:
•
Local
Community Members: 100
local
individuals directly involved in marine conservation or
who live in coastal areas.
•
Policy Makers: 20 individuals from local and
national government agencies responsible for marine
conservation policies and enforcement.
•
Marine Scientists/NGO Representatives: 30
individuals working with NGOs or research institutions
on marine conservation projects.
Participants were selected using purposive sampling,
ensuring that those involved had direct experience or
influence in marine conservation in the respective
regions.
Data Collection
The study employed a mixed-methods approach for
data collection to capture both the statistical
relationship
between
community
engagement,
technology, and policy enforcement, as well as the
nuanced perspectives of stakeholders. The three
primary methods used were:
1.
Surveys
o
Objective: To gather quantitative data on the
effectiveness of community engagement, technology
use, and policy enforcement from the perspectives of
local community members.
o
Design: A structured survey was developed with
both closed and Likert scale questions. The survey
assessed three main areas:
1.
Community
Engagement:
Participants
’
involvement in marine conservation efforts, perceived
benefits of local participation, and overall attitudes
toward conservation practices.
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
3
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
2.
Technology: Use of technological tools in
marine monitoring and their perceived effectiveness
(e.g., drones, satellite imagery, mobile apps).
3.
Policy Enforcement: Awareness of local and
national marine protection policies, the role of
enforcement, and the perceived effectiveness of
regulations.
o
Sampling: Surveys were distributed to 100
local residents in each region, with the aim to collect a
broad range of responses that represent the general
population in each area.
o
Data Analysis: Quantitative data were
analyzed using descriptive statistics (mean, standard
deviation) and inferential tests (e.g., chi-square test) to
identify relationships and significant patterns between
community engagement, technology, and policy
enforcement.
2.
Interviews
o
Objective: To obtain qualitative insights from
policymakers,
marine
scientists,
and
NGO
representatives on the impact of the integrated
approaches to marine conservation.
o
Design: Semi-structured interviews were
conducted with open-ended questions to explore
participants' experiences and perceptions of the
effectiveness of community engagement, technology,
and policy enforcement in marine environmental
protection. The interviews aimed to understand:
1.
How community involvement contributes to
marine conservation success.
2.
The
challenges
and
opportunities
in
integrating technology for marine monitoring.
3.
The barriers to effective policy enforcement
and how to improve it.
o
Sampling: Interviews were conducted with 20
experts (5 from each region), selected based on their
roles in marine conservation.
o
Data Analysis: Transcribed interviews were
analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key
themes and patterns related to each of the three core
areas of focus. Themes were coded and grouped to
understand broader trends in responses and identify
recurring insights.
3.
Case Studies
o
Objective: To provide a deeper, context-
specific understanding of how integrated approaches
are implemented in practice.
o
Design: Detailed case studies were selected
from each region, focusing on a specific initiative or
project that exemplified the integration of community
engagement, technology, and policy enforcement. Each
case study involved:
1.
Reviewing project documentation and reports.
2.
Conducting interviews with project leaders and
local participants.
3.
Analyzing data on environmental outcomes
(e.g., reduction in illegal fishing, improvement in
biodiversity).
o
Sampling: Case studies were selected based on
their successful or innovative use of all three
approaches. These included a community-based MPA in
the Philippines, a high-tech marine monitoring project
in California, a collaborative marine conservation
initiative in Greece, and a robust policy enforcement
program in Norway.
o
Data Analysis: The data from the case studies
were analyzed qualitatively by examining the
integration of community engagement, technology, and
policy enforcement in each case. Environmental impact
data were also assessed to measure the effectiveness of
the combined approaches.
Data Analysis Procedures
1.
Quantitative Data (Surveys):
o
Survey responses were entered into a statistical
software program (e.g., SPSS). Descriptive statistics
were calculated to summarize participants' responses
on community engagement, technology use, and policy
enforcement. Inferential tests (such as chi-square or
correlation analysis) were used to determine any
statistically significant relationships between the three
approaches and their impact on marine conservation
outcomes.
2.
Qualitative Data (Interviews and Case Studies):
o
Interview transcripts were coded using NVivo
software, identifying recurring themes related to the
role of community engagement, technology, and policy
enforcement. These themes were then grouped and
analyzed to draw conclusions about the strengths,
weaknesses, and synergies between the three
approaches.
o
Case study analysis involved a cross-case
comparison, examining the effectiveness of the
integrated
approaches
in
different
contexts.
Environmental outcome data from the case studies
were also analyzed to measure the success of the
initiatives in terms of biodiversity conservation,
pollution reduction, and sustainable fishing practices.
Ethical Considerations
In line with ethical research practices, all participants
were informed about the nature of the study and their
rights to confidentiality and anonymity. Consent was
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
4
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
obtained from all participants, and they were assured
that their participation was voluntary and that they
could withdraw at any time without penalty.
Additionally, all data collected were anonymized and
securely stored to protect participants' privacy.
Limitations
While the study provides valuable insights into the
integration of community engagement, technology,
and policy enforcement in marine conservation, it is
not without limitations:
•
Regional Bias: The regions selected for the
study were chosen for their varying approaches to
marine conservation but may not fully represent all
global contexts.
•
Sample Size: The sample size for surveys and
interviews was limited to specific regions and may not
fully capture the diversity of opinions or experiences
across all marine conservation areas.
•
Temporal Limitations: The study’s timeframe
did not allow for the collection of longitudinal data,
which would have provided more insights into the
long-term impacts of integrated conservation
strategies.
Despite these limitations, the study offers important
contributions to understanding how these innovative
approaches can work together to protect marine
ecosystems. Future research could expand on these
findings by including a broader range of regions,
longer-term data, and more in-depth examination of
specific technologies or policy frameworks.
Data Analysis
The survey data were analyzed using descriptive
statistics and inferential tests, such as chi-square tests,
to assess the relationships between community
engagement, the use of technology, and policy
enforcement on marine conservation outcomes. The
interview data were analyzed using thematic analysis
to identify recurring patterns and themes in the
participants' responses. Case studies were analyzed
qualitatively to evaluate the effectiveness of
integrated approaches in different contexts.
RESULTS
Survey Results
The survey results indicated that community
engagement plays a central role in successful marine
environmental protection efforts. Over 80% of
respondents in the experimental regions reported that
active participation in marine conservation efforts led
to a greater sense of ownership and responsibility
toward local marine resources. In contrast, only 40% of
respondents
in
regions
without
community
involvement expressed a similar commitment to marine
conservation. Additionally, 75% of those in community-
driven conservation programs believed that technology,
such as satellite monitoring and underwater sensors,
greatly enhanced their ability to track and manage
marine health.
When it came to policy enforcement, 65% of
respondents believed that stricter enforcement of
marine protection laws significantly reduced illegal
fishing and pollution, but 45% felt that local
enforcement was inconsistent. Notably, those in areas
with stronger enforcement mechanisms reported
better compliance with regulations.
Interview Results
Interviews revealed that technology was seen as a
valuable tool in both monitoring and enforcement.
Several participants emphasized the role of data
collection technologies, such as drones, remote sensing,
and data analytics, in providing real-time information on
marine
conditions.
One
interviewee
stated,
“Technologies like drones and satellite imagery have
made it possible to monitor vast areas of ocean without
requiring large manpower. This allows us to quickly
identify problem areas and respond efficiently.”
Regarding community engagement, interviewees noted
that local participation led to better enforcement of
policies and stronger collective action. For instance, one
policy maker mentioned, “Involving local communities
in the development and monitoring of marine policies
ensures that regulations are more accepted and
followed. It’s harder for illegal activities to continue
when locals are involved.”
Case Study Results
The case studies showed a high level of success in
regions that implemented integrated strategies. For
example, a community-led initiative in the Philippines,
supported by real-time data technology and a
comprehensive legal framework, saw a significant
reduction in illegal fishing activities, and marine
biodiversity improved over a five-year period. Similarly,
in the Mediterranean, the use of mobile technology for
environmental monitoring was paired with community-
based enforcement systems, resulting in increased
public awareness and a 25% increase in marine
protected area coverage.
DISCUSSION
The results of this study highlight the importance of
integrating community engagement, technology, and
policy enforcement in achieving effective marine
environmental protection. One of the key findings is
that when local communities are actively involved in
marine conservation efforts, they are more likely to take
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
5
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
ownership of these initiatives, leading to more
sustainable outcomes. This is consistent with Berkes’
(2009) research, which emphasizes the importance of
local knowledge and participation in conservation
management.
Moreover, the study reinforces the notion that
technology is indispensable in modern conservation
efforts. The ability to monitor vast and inaccessible
areas of the ocean in real-time allows for better
decision-making, more accurate data collection, and
more effective enforcement of policies. The positive
feedback from local communities about the role of
technology suggests that these tools not only enhance
monitoring but also foster a sense of transparency and
trust between communities, NGOs, and governments.
Policy enforcement, while critical, was found to be
most effective when paired with community
engagement. Areas with stronger community
involvement were better at ensuring compliance with
regulations, and enforcement agencies benefitted
from local support. This suggests that policies should
be co-designed with local stakeholders to ensure their
effectiveness.
However, the study also highlights some challenges.
Inconsistencies in policy enforcement, particularly in
regions with limited resources or political will, can
undermine the progress made through community
engagement and technological advancements. This
underscores the need for stronger governance
frameworks that ensure sustained and equitable
enforcement.
CONCLUSION
The findings from this study emphasize the vital role
that community engagement, technology, and policy
enforcement play in the protection of marine
environments. The integration of these three
approaches creates a powerful framework for
addressing the complex and multifaceted challenges
that marine ecosystems face. While each approach can
contribute individually, their combined effects are far
more effective in achieving sustainable marine
conservation outcomes.
Community Engagement as a Cornerstone
One of the most striking outcomes of this research is
the central role that community engagement plays in
enhancing marine environmental protection. The
study shows that when local communities are directly
involved in the management and conservation of
marine ecosystems, they become more invested in the
long-term health of these areas. The sense of
ownership that community members feel for their
environment fosters more sustainable practices, as
they are directly impacted by the health of marine
resources. For instance, areas where local communities
have been empowered to monitor and enforce
regulations reported better compliance and stronger
collective action against illegal activities such as
overfishing and pollution.
Moreover, the active participation of local stakeholders
in decision-making processes strengthens the social
fabric around marine conservation. Communities that
are educated and involved are more likely to advocate
for the preservation of their environment, leading to
long-
lasting behavioral changes. The study’s case
studies from regions such as the Philippines show how
community-led
initiatives,
supported
by
local
governance structures, lead to a reduction in
destructive practices and improvements in biodiversity.
The success of these initiatives speaks to the importance
of involving communities not just as beneficiaries, but
as active contributors to marine conservation strategies.
The Critical Role of Technology
Technology has emerged as a crucial tool for
monitoring,
assessing,
and
managing
marine
environments. As the findings of this study reveal,
technological advancements in satellite imaging,
underwater sensors, drones, and data analytics enable
real-time monitoring of marine ecosystems. These
technologies have made it possible to track and address
environmental challenges on an unprecedented scale.
The ability to detect and respond to pollution,
overfishing, and illegal activities in real-time greatly
enhances the ability of stakeholders to take immediate
and effective action.
In particular, technologies that allow for continuous
data collection have created a more transparent and
data-driven approach to marine management. These
tools have empowered both communities and
policymakers with actionable information that can
guide decisions and improve enforcement. For example,
the use of mobile apps for monitoring marine protected
areas (MPAs) has facilitated citizen science and
increased public participation in conservation activities.
The positive feedback from local communities and
NGOs highlights how technology not only supports
environmental monitoring but also strengthens
community trust and accountability.
However, the integration of technology into marine
conservation is not without challenges. While the
technology itself has proven effective, the infrastructure
to support it
—
particularly in remote or resource-limited
areas
—
remains a barrier. Additionally, the data
produced by these technologies need to be interpreted
effectively, requiring capacity-building efforts among
local stakeholders and policymakers. Therefore,
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
6
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
continued
investment
in
both
technological
infrastructure and human capacity is essential for
sustaining the benefits of these tools in marine
conservation.
Policy Enforcement as a Necessity
Effective policy enforcement remains a cornerstone of
marine environmental protection. Without strong
regulatory
frameworks
and
their
consistent
implementation, the gains made through community
engagement and technological innovation can be
undermined. The study found that policy enforcement
significantly reduced illegal activities such as poaching,
overfishing, and pollution. However, enforcement was
most successful when complemented by community
engagement and technological monitoring.
In regions where communities were involved in the
enforcement process
—
either through participatory
monitoring or by assisting with reporting violations
—
compliance rates were significantly higher. This
reinforces the idea that policies are more effective
when they are designed with local knowledge and
input, creating a sense of shared responsibility for
enforcement. Furthermore, the study revealed that
when policies are enforced consistently, with clear
consequences for violations, marine ecosystems are
more likely to recover and remain protected.
However, inconsistencies in enforcement, especially in
areas where political will or resources are lacking, can
compromise the effectiveness of policies. Many
regions continue to face challenges in balancing
regulatory measures with the needs and capacity of
local communities, as well as the complexities of
marine ecosystems that often span national
boundaries. This highlights the importance of regional
and international collaboration in policy enforcement,
ensuring that conservation efforts are synchronized
and that the enforcement of regulations remains
robust across jurisdictions.
Sustainability and Long-Term Impact
The results of this study indicate that sustainable
marine protection depends on an adaptive, integrated
approach that evolves with both the challenges posed
by marine ecosystems and the advancements in
scientific understanding. Community engagement,
technology, and policy enforcement are not static
solutions but must be continually refined and adapted
to respond to emerging threats and new opportunities.
Long-term sustainability also hinges on the ongoing
education of local communities, the continuous
advancement of technology, and the strengthening of
governance structures. The study suggests that for
marine conservation efforts to remain effective, there
must be a feedback loop where community involvement
informs policy development, technological tools are
constantly upgraded, and enforcement mechanisms are
regularly evaluated and adjusted. A holistic approach
that integrates these components ensures that marine
ecosystems can withstand the growing pressures of
human activity and climate change.
Future Research and Recommendations
This study opens the door for future research that
further explores the synergies between community
engagement, technology, and policy enforcement.
Future studies could focus on understanding the specific
technologies that have the most significant impact on
marine conservation, examining the role of emerging
technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine
learning in predictive monitoring. Additionally, research
into the scalability of community-driven conservation
models across different cultural and political contexts
would be valuable in designing globally applicable
conservation strategies.
Furthermore, longitudinal studies that assess the long-
term effects of integrated marine conservation
strategies would provide insights into the sustainability
and evolution of these efforts. Understanding how
different regions adapt to technological advancements
and policy changes over time could inform more
resilient conservation models for the future.
Final Thoughts
In conclusion, this study highlights that an integrated,
multidisciplinary approach is essential to the future of
marine environmental protection. By combining
community engagement, advanced technology, and
rigorous policy enforcement, we can create a model of
marine conservation that is not only effective in
addressing current challenges but also resilient in the
face of future threats. As global marine ecosystems
continue to face unprecedented pressures, the need for
such innovative and collaborative solutions has never
been more urgent. By learning from successful case
studies and continuously improving upon these
approaches, we can work toward safeguarding the
oceans for future generations.
The results of this study suggest that the most successful
marine environmental protection efforts are those that
combine
community
engagement,
advanced
technologies, and robust policy enforcement. By
fostering a collaborative approach where communities
are actively involved in both the management and
monitoring of marine resources, these integrated
strategies have the potential to create long-lasting,
sustainable changes in the protection of marine
ecosystems. Future research could explore the
scalability of these approaches in other regions and
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
7
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
examine the specific technological tools and policy
mechanisms that contribute to their success.
REFERENCES
Abdulla, K. H., & Naser, H. A. (2021). Protection of
marine environmental quality in the Kingdom of
Bahrain. Ocean and Coastal Management, 203.
Alam, M. W., Bhuyan, M. S., & Xiangmin, X. (2021).
Protecting the Environment from Marine Pollution in
Bangladesh: A Brief in Legal Aspects with Response to
National and International Cooperation’s. Thalassas,
37(2).
Botetzagias, I., & Malesios, C. (2021). Do single-use
facemask users’ care for the effects on the (marine)
environment during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Preliminary results from Greece. Marine Pollution
Bulletin, 167.
Chang, Y. C., Wang, C., Khan, M. I., & Wang, N. (2020).
The legal system for environmental protection during
exploration and exploitation of marine mineral
resources in China. Resources Policy, 67.
Chen, X., & Qian, W. (2020). Effect of marine
environmental regulation on the industrial structure
adjustment of manufacturing industry: An empirical
analysis of China’s eleven coastal provinces. Marine
Policy, 113.
Chuah, L. F., Mokhtar, K., Bakar, A. A., Othman, M. R.,
Osman, N. H., Bokhari, A., Mubashir, M., Abdullah, M.
A., & Hasan, M. (2022). Marine environment and
maritime safety assessment using Port State Control
database. Chemosphere, 304.
Copping, A. E., Hemery, L. G., Overhus, D. M., Garavelli,
L., Freeman, M. C., Whiting, J. M., Gorton, A. M., Farr,
H. K., Rose, D. J., & Tugade, L. G. (2020). Potential
environmental effects of marine renewable energy
development
—
the state of the science. Journal of
Marine Science and Engineering, 8(11).
Craik, N., & Gu, K. (2022). Strategic Environmental
Assessment in Marine Areas beyond National
Jurisdiction: Implementing Integration. International
Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 37(2).
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010).
Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. In
Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective (Vol.
7th).
Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2022).
A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation
Modeling (PLS-SEM).
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new
criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-
based structural equation modeling. Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1).
Johnston, J. R., Needham, M. D., Cramer, L. A., &
Swearingen, T. C. (2020). Public Values and Attitudes
toward Marine Reserves and Marine Wilderness.
Coastal Management, 48(2).
Koban, L., Pourtois, G., Bediou, B., & Vuilleumier, P.
(2012). Effects of social context and predictive relevance
on action outcome monitoring. Cognitive, Affective and
Behavioral Neuroscience, 12(3).
Kriegl, M., Elías Ilosvay, X. E., von Dorrien, C., &
Oesterwind, D. (2021). Marine Protected Areas: At the
Crossroads of Nature Conservation and Fisheries
Management. In Frontiers in Marine Science (Vol. 8).
Kumar, L., Afzal, M. S., & Ahmad, A. (2022). Prediction of
water turbidity in a marine environment using machine
learning: A case study of Hong Kong. Regional Studies in
Marine Science, 52.
Liu, B., Gong, M., Wu, X., & Liu, X. (2021). A
comprehensive model of vessel anchoring pressure
based on machine learning to support the sustainable
management of the marine environments of coastal
cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 72.
Manasbay, A., Beisengaliyev, B., Turekulova, A.,
Kurmankulova, N., & Turekulova, D. (2021). Impact of
the marine transport system and public administration
on the environmental protection. Journal of
Environmental Management and Tourism, 12(3).
Murad, M., Othman, S. B., & Kamarudin, M. A. I. B.
(2024a). Entrepreneurial University Input, Process, and
Output Support for Student Entrepreneurship: Growing
Innovation through University Programs. Journal of the
Knowledge Economy.
Murad, M., Othman, S. B., & Kamarudin, M. A. I. B.
(2024b). Entrepreneurial university support and
entrepreneurial career: the directions for university
policy to influence students’ entrepreneurial intention
and behavior. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public
Policy, 13(3), 441-467.
Nwuzor, I. C., Idumah, C. I., Nwanonenyi, S. C., & Ezeani,
O. E. (2021). Emerging trends in self-polishing anti-
fouling coatings for marine environment. Safety in
Extreme Environments, 3(1).
Onyena, A., Aniche, D., Ogbolu, B., Rakib, M., Uddin, J.,
& Walker, T. (2021). Governance Strategies for
Mitigating Microplastic Pollution in the Marine
Environment: A Review. Microplastics, 1(1).
Pang, H., Feng, Y., An, J., Chen, P., Han, J., Jiang, T., &
Wang, Z. L. (2021). Segmented Swing-Structured Fur-
Based Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Harvesting Blue
Energy toward Marine Environmental Applications.
Advanced Functional Materials, 31(47).
Peng, D., Yang, Q., Yang, H. J., Liu, H., Zhu, Y., & Mu, Y.
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
8
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
(2020). Analysis on the relationship between fisheries
economic growth and marine environmental pollution
in China’s coastal regions. Science of
the Total
Environment, 713.
Pirsaheb, M., Hossini, H., & Makhdoumi, P. (2020).
Review of microplastic occurrence and toxicological
effects in marine environment: Experimental evidence
of inflammation. In Process Safety and Environmental
Protection (Vol. 142).
Qu, F., Li, W., Dong, W., Tam, V. W. Y., & Yu, T. (2021).
Durability deterioration of concrete under marine
environment from material to structure: A critical
review. In Journal of Building Engineering (Vol. 35).
Ren, W., & Ji, J. (2021). How do environmental
regulation and technological innovation affect the
sustainable development of marine economy: New
evidence from China’s coastal provinces and cities.
Marine Policy, 128.
Sands, P. (2023). Environmental Protection in the
Twenty-first Century: Sustainable Development and
International Law. In The Global Environment.
Shih, Y. C., Chen, W. C., Chen, T. A. P., & Chang, C. W.
(2023). The development of ocean governance for
marine environment protection: Current legal system
in Taiwan. Frontiers in Marine Science, 10.
