Topical issues of language training
in the globalized world
281
6.
Saidova Mamura Suleymanovna.
“
The concept of function and context within the framework
of the communicative approach”. (2023).
Western European Journal of Historical Events and
Social Science
,
1
(3), 46-48.
THE PROBLEM OF CORRESPONDING FUNCTIONAL AND PRAGMATIC
CHARACTERISTICS TO BASIC COMPONENTS OF COMMUNICATION
Saidova Nihola
student
Uzbekistan State World Languages University
Scientific advisor Saidova M.S
USWLU, Associate professor (PhD)
Abstract
This article delves into the intricate problem of aligning functional and pragmatic
characteristics in communication. It emphasizes the significance of both components and explores
the challenges that arise when they are misaligned. The article provides valuable insights and
strategies for achieving effective communication by understanding the interplay between functional
and pragmatic characteristics. The article suggests strategies like developing cultural awareness to
navigate intercultural interactions, practicing active listening to understand the speaker
’
s thoughts
and intentions, seeking clarification and providing feedback to ensure mutual understanding,
adapting communication styles to match the receiver
’
s preferences, and embracing empathy and
open-mindedness to create an inclusive communication environment. By integrating these strategies,
individuals can overcome the challenges of aligning functional and pragmatic characteristics,
leading to more effective communication and improved social connections in various settings. By
understanding the interplay between functional and pragmatic characteristics, individuals can
enhance their communication skills and foster better understanding in diverse social contexts.
Keywords:
communication, functional characteristics, pragmatic characteristics, language,
cultural awareness, active listening, adaptation, empathy.
Communication is a fundamental aspect of human interaction, serving as a means
to convey information, express emotions, and establish social connections. However,
the process of effective communication involves more than just the exchange of words;
it relies on the integration of functional and pragmatic characteristics. The challenge
lies in aligning these two essential components to ensure that the intended message is
accurately conveyed and understood. In this article, we will explore the problem of
corresponding functional and pragmatic characteristics to the basic components of
communication and discuss some strategies for achieving effective communication
(Clark, 1996).
Topical issues of language training
in the globalized world
282
Functional characteristics refer to the basic elements of communication that
facilitate the transmission of information. These elements include language, grammar,
vocabulary, and syntax. Language provides the structure and framework for conveying
meaning, while grammar, vocabulary, and syntax contribute to the formation of
coherent and intelligible messages. Functional characteristics are essential for clarity
and precision in communication, ensuring that ideas and thoughts are accurately
expressed.
Pragmatic characteristics, on the other hand, focus on the contextual and social
aspects of communication. These characteristics encompass factors such as tone of
voice, div language, cultural norms, and shared knowledge between communicators.
Pragmatics play a crucial role in shaping the meaning of a message within a specific
context and in enabling effective interpersonal communication. They allow individuals
to interpret implied meanings, understand humor, detect sarcasm, and respond
appropriately to social cues.
The challenge arises when attempting to align functional and pragmatic
characteristics in communication. In an ideal scenario, both components should work
in harmony to ensure accurate message transmission and comprehension. However,
several factors can hinder this alignment. For instance, language barriers may impede
effective communication between individuals who speak different languages or have
limited language proficiency. Cultural differences can also lead to misunderstandings,
as norms and expectations regarding communication may vary significantly across
cultures.
Additionally, misinterpretations can occur due to variations in nonverbal cues,
such as facial expressions, gestures, and div language, which can differ across
individuals and cultures. Furthermore, the rapid rise of digital communication
platforms adds another layer of complexity, as the absence of nonverbal cues can lead
to misinterpretations and misunderstandings.
While the complete alignment of functional and pragmatic characteristics may be
challenging, several strategies can enhance communication effectiveness:
Topical issues of language training
in the globalized world
283
1. Cultural Awareness: Developing cultural awareness involves gaining knowledge
and understanding of different cultural norms, values, and communication styles. This
awareness helps individuals navigate intercultural interactions more effectively by
recognizing and respecting cultural differences. It includes being aware of variations
in verbal and nonverbal communication patterns, such as gestures, facial expressions,
and personal space. By understanding and appreciating cultural diversity, individuals
can adapt their communication approach to be more inclusive and avoid
misunderstandings (Gudykunst, Ting-Toomey, 1988).
2. Active Listening: Active listening is a crucial strategy for effective communication.
It involves fully focusing on the speaker, both verbally and nonverbally. Active
listening includes paying attention to the speaker
’
s words, tone of voice, and div
language. By actively engaging in the conversation and demonstrating genuine interest,
individuals can better understand the speaker
’
s thoughts, feelings, and intentions.
Active listening also involves providing verbal and nonverbal cues, such as nodding,
maintaining eye contact, and using appropriate facial expressions, to show
understanding and encourage the speaker to continue sharing.
3. Clarification and Feedback: Seeking clarification and providing feedback are
essential for ensuring mutual understanding in communication. When individuals are
uncertain about the intended message, they should ask questions or request further
explanation to clarify any ambiguities. This can prevent misunderstandings and help
both parties align their understanding. Additionally, providing feedback allows
individuals to confirm their comprehension of the message and address any
misinterpretations. Constructive feedback can be given through paraphrasing,
summarizing, or reflecting on the speaker
’
s message, demonstrating active engagement
and promoting mutual understanding.
4. Adapting Communication Style: Adapting one
’
s communication style involves
tailoring the way they communicate to match the needs and preferences of the receiver.
This strategy recognizes that individuals have different communication styles,
language proficiency levels, and cultural backgrounds. Adapting the communication
Topical issues of language training
in the globalized world
284
style includes using appropriate language choices, considering the tone and formality
of speech, and adjusting nonverbal cues to resonate with the other person. By adapting
the communication style, individuals can enhance understanding, build rapport, and
establish effective communication channels with others
5. Empathy and Open-mindedness: Empathy and open-mindedness play a vital role in
fostering effective communication. Empathy involves understanding and sharing the
feelings and perspectives of others. By putting oneself in the other person
’
s shoes,
individuals can better grasp their emotions, motivations, and points of view. Open-
mindedness entails approaching communication without preconceived judgments or
biases, being receptive to diverse opinions, and valuing different perspectives. By
practicing empathy and open-mindedness, individuals create a safe and inclusive
environment that encourages open dialogue, collaboration, and mutual respect (Hargie,
Dickson, 2004).
The challenge of aligning functional and pragmatic characteristics in
communication is a complex yet important endeavor. While language provides the
foundation for conveying meaning, pragmatic characteristics shape the context and
interpretation of messages. By developing cultural awareness, practicing active
listening, seeking clarification, adapting communication styles, and embracing
empathy, individuals can overcome some of the barriers to effective communication.
Striving for alignment between these two components is crucial for fostering
understanding, building relationships, and promoting successful communication in
diverse and evolving social landscapes.
References
1.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
2.
Gudykunst, W. B., & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and affective communication. American
Behavioral Scientist, 31(3), 384
–
400.
3.
Hargie, O. and Dickson, D. (2004) Skilled Interpersonal Communication: Research, Theory and
Practice. 4th Edition, Routledge Publishing, London.
4.
Shapran, N. V., Novoseletska, S. V., Koliada, E. K., Musiichuk, T. I., & Simak, K. V. (2021).
Communicative-functional components of discourse. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S4),
1325-1339.
Topical issues of language training
in the globalized world
285
5.
Saidova, M. S., & Khodzhaeva, K. U. K. Features of the texts of international treaties as a kind
of official-business style. Novainfo. RU, (128), 42-43.
6.
Mukhamedova, N. A. “The role of modality contamination and negation in the interrogative
sentence”. Novainfo. Ru, (130), 59
-61.
COMPARATIVE AND TYPOLOGICAL APPROACHES TO ANALYZING
POLYSEMY IN LINGUISTIC TERMS
Satibaldiev Erkinjon
Uzbekistan state world languages university
Teacher
the department of teaching
English methodology №3
Christian Capone
Kazakh-British Technical University
AP Coordinator
UoL LSE Program Director, PhD
Abstract
This research examines speech interference and facilitation in second language acquisition
among students whose native languages are Russian and Uzbek. It analyzes the impact of linguistic
and cultural factors on learning English, incorporating theoretical insights from both domestic and
international scholars. The study highlights the dual nature of language contact
–
interference, which
negatively affects language learning, and facilitation, which positively transfers features from the
native to the foreign language. Various forms of interference, including phonetic, grammatical, and
cultural, are explored through empirical data and linguistic analysis. The findings offer valuable
implications for language education, suggesting strategies for educators to mitigate interference and
enhance language acquisition. This comprehensive approach provides a deeper understanding of the
multifaceted interactions between languages, contributing to more effective teaching methodologies
in multilingual settings.
Key words:
speech interference, second language acquisition, language facilitation,
linguistic analysis, educational strategies, multilingual education, cultural factors
The interaction between a learner
’
s native language and a foreign language
presents a myriad of challenges and opportunities within the scope of linguistics,
particularly in the domain of second language acquisition. This research paper focuses
on speech interference, a phenomenon that significantly influences language learning
outcomes. As learners with Russian and Uzbek backgrounds embark on acquiring
English, their linguistic journey is shaped by both facilitating and interfering forces
inherent in language contact. The dual nature of this interaction
–
where interference
