INTANGIBLE ASSETS AS THE CORNERSTONE OF TECH INDUSTRY GROWTH AND INNOVATION

CC BY f
324-329
0
To share
Akhmetova , N. (2025). INTANGIBLE ASSETS AS THE CORNERSTONE OF TECH INDUSTRY GROWTH AND INNOVATION. Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations, 1(2), 324–329. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/jmsi/article/view/85776
0
Citations
Crossref
Сrossref
Scopus
Scopus
Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Innovations

Abstract

 With an emphasis on technology companies, this article examines the importance of intangible assets, especially intellectual property (IP). Intellectual property, goodwill, patents, and trademarks are examples of intangible assets, which are described by IAS 38 as identifiable non-monetary assets devoid of physical substance. These assets are essential for long-term economic performance. A thorough discussion of IP's function in the technology industry is given, emphasizing how it can lead to market dominance and competitive advantages. The review of the literature sheds light on how intangible assets affect financial performance. Research indicates that higher R&D and technology-related asset investments have a positive impact on important financial metrics like return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA), return on invested capital (ROIC), net profit margin, and asset turnover (ATO). With a focus on the growth of brand value and the strategic significance of intellectual property for digital companies like Apple, Google, and Microsoft, the article goes into additional detail about the intangible assets' increasing market worth over time. An examination of businesses' increasing reliance on intangible assets as a source of value and financial leverage is presented in the paper's conclusion.

 

 


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 3, 2025

324

INTANGIBLE ASSETS AS THE CORNERSTONE OF TECH INDUSTRY GROWTH

AND INNOVATION

Akhmetova Nasiba Akhmetovna

Tashkent State University of Economics

Accounting faculty student

nasibaaxmetova625@gmail.com

Abstract:

With an emphasis on technology companies, this article examines the importance of

intangible assets, especially intellectual property (IP). Intellectual property, goodwill, patents,

and trademarks are examples of intangible assets, which are described by IAS 38 as identifiable

non-monetary assets devoid of physical substance. These assets are essential for long-term

economic performance. A thorough discussion of IP's function in the technology industry is

given, emphasizing how it can lead to market dominance and competitive advantages. The

review of the literature sheds light on how intangible assets affect financial performance.

Research indicates that higher R&D and technology-related asset investments have a positive

impact on important financial metrics like return on equity (ROE), return on assets (ROA), return

on invested capital (ROIC), net profit margin, and asset turnover (ATO). With a focus on the

growth of brand value and the strategic significance of intellectual property for digital companies

like Apple, Google, and Microsoft, the article goes into additional detail about the intangible

assets' increasing market worth over time. An examination of businesses' increasing reliance on

intangible assets as a source of value and financial leverage is presented in the paper's conclusion.

Key words:

Intangible assets, IAS 38, intellectual property, technology, ROE, ROA, ROIC,

digital transformation, intellectual property rights, IP management.

Introduction:

Buildings and office furniture are examples of tangible assets, which are different from

intangible assets. Goodwill, intellectual property, and patents are examples of intangible assets

for firms. Intangible assets can appreciate in value over time and are typically seen as long-term

investments. For a business to succeed in the long run, an intangible asset like a brand name can

be essential. Intangible assets can be produced or purchased by businesses. For instance, a

business might establish a patent or start a mailing list of customers. It can deduct the costs of the

procedure, including paying for a lawyer, submitting the patent application, and other associated

charges. Many businesses are unaware that their designs, trademarks, and other intangible

property rights and assets are frequently worth more than their inventories, for instance. A

company's intangible assets are frequently its most valuable asset and can be leveraged to secure

funding for the expansion of the business.
For example, a valuation may become necessary when:

You intend to license out an intangible asset and would need to predict the future license

fees.

You intend to purchase or sell a company. A better price can subsequently be obtained


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 3, 2025

325

with

the

use

of

an

intangible

asset

value.

Your intangible assets can be valued using a variety of techniques, including the cost method,

market value method, income method, and economic benefit approach. Finding a technique that

is universal and effective in every circumstance is challenging because every approach has pros

and cons. It is up to you to determine which approach works best for your business. There are

companies in the market that offer valuation services and can guide you in obtaining the most

trustworthy appraisal available.

The definition of an intangible asset is "an identifiable non-monetary asset without physical

substance" (IASB standard 38). The usual definition of an asset, which is a historical occurrence

that created a resource that the entity owns and from which future economic benefits are

expected to flow, is supplemented by this definition. Accordingly, IAS 38 adds identifiability as

a condition for an intangible asset, stating that it must be derived from a contractual or legal right

or be detachable from the entity. If an intangible asset meets the recognition criteria—which

include being identifiable (fitting the definition of an intangible asset), controlled by the

company, likely to generate future economic benefits, and having a reliable estimate of its

value—it is recognized. The costs are included in the financial result as period expenses if they

don't meet the recognized criteria.

The Role of Intellectual Property (IP) in Tech:

For tech companies, intellectual property (IP) is essential since it gives their discoveries legal

protection and a competitive advantage. By protecting distinctive goods, software, algorithms,

and brand identities, patents, copyrights, and trademarks enable businesses to profit from their

innovations and preserve their market leadership. For instance, Apple has a dominant market

position because to its vast patent portfolio, which safeguards its technological advancements

and design breakthroughs, like the touch-screen interface of the iPhone. In addition to

guaranteeing a better customer experience, Google's unique algorithms, such as its search engine

algorithm, also significantly raise the bar for rivals to enter the market. In a similar vein,

Microsoft makes money from software licenses for products like Office and Windows while

preventing illegal usage of its software. These intellectual property assets serve as more than

simply legal instruments; they are the cornerstone upon which IT firms erect and grow their

market dominance.

Literature review

:

DA Siddiqui, MJ Qureshi states that R&D expenditures are considered assets or investments.

This option will affect financial performance, but because it increases the knowledge asymmetry

between managers and shareholders, the effect is hard to predict. The hypothesis developed from

this literature review is supported by Canibano, Garcia-Ayuso, and Sanchez (2000) and Lantz et

al. (2005), which demonstrate the existence of enhanced returns due to greater spending on

research and development. The technological company's financial performance is directly

improved by intangible assets. The impact of intangible assets on ROE is substantial. ROA is

significantly impacted by intangible assets. ROIC is significantly impacted by intangible assets.

The impact of intangible assets on Net Profit is substantial.

According to Reilly, technology intangible assets are broadly defined as intangible assets that

create proprietary knowledge and processes for the debtor company. This proprietary knowledge

or process may be either developed or purchased by the debtor owner/ operator. The following

intangible assets are typically included in this category: patents, patent applications, patentable

inventions, trade secrets, know-how, proprietary processes, confidential information and

copyrights on technical materials.

The study by Lefebvre, L. A., Lefebvre, E., & Harvey, J. examines the connection between


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 3, 2025

326

enhanced adoption of advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) in 116 small manufacturing

enterprises and intangible assets. The findings show that the most powerful factors influencing

later stages of adoption are the technical proficiency of blue-collar workers, the impact of clients

and suppliers, and strategic incentives centered on client and process development.

C. Forero-Pineda, this report explores relevant arguments and identifies some implications on

developing nations of the worldwide trend toward increased protection of intellectual property

rights. Important areas of effect include pharmaceutics, biodiversity, and ethnic knowledge.

Although "trade-relating" intellectual property may make it possible to compensate developing

nations, it appears that lawmakers will not be able to create incentives for the best possible

remuneration. Because it takes a lot of work to get normal scientific results, scientific

communities in underdeveloped nations are especially vulnerable to restrictions on collaboration

and information access brought about by stricter intellectual property rights protection.

Methodology:

As was already noted, these articles comprise a variety of factors, such as ROA, ROE, ROIC,

ATO, and others. Let's talk about what these factors mean. The first is return on assets (ROA),

which measures a company's profitability in relation to its total assets. A manager, investor, or

analyst can determine how well a company's management uses its assets to produce earnings by

looking at ROA. Return on equity, which is a metric of financial success determined by dividing

net income by shareholders' equity, comes next. ROE could be viewed as the return on net assets

since shareholders' equity is calculated as the sum of a company's assets less its debt. A

profitability or performance ratio called return on invested capital seeks to quantify the

percentage return that investors in a business are receiving on their capital. Additionally, it shows

the remaining worth of assets less obligations. The next is Assets Turnover, a financial ratio that

assesses how well a business uses its assets to produce sales income or revenue. The final one is

the debt-to-equity ratio, which is computed by dividing the total liabilities of a business by the

equity held by its shareholders. The balance sheet of a business's financial statements contains

these figures. The ratio is employed to assess the financial leverage of a business.

Analysis:

The analysis of this article will be started with Figure 1, which describes the investment rate by

type of asset as percentage. As it is visible from the graph, in 1977 it was not common to use

intangible assets within the company, while the indicator for tangible asset accounted for 15%.

By 1990, the difference between two indicators narrowed year by year. And at the end of the

period, tangible and intangible assets exchanged their places, and accounted for 9.5% and 14.3%

respectively.

Figure 1. Investment Rate by type of Asset Percentage

This shift to digital has introduced new business models and monetization strategies. This has


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 3, 2025

327

created new revenue streams, information sharing possibilities, efficiency and productivity gains,

and subsequently enhanced profitability and market penetration. Customers have in turn

benefited through an increased emphasis on improved customer service and accountability

towards satisfaction with goods and services.
Figure 2, explains information on market value of intangible assets. As we can see from the

graph, the market value of intellectual property increased gradually between the years of 1975

and 2015. In short words, the rate of market value of intangible assets increased by $ 19,21 trn

within 43 years. To conclude, the main point form the graph is this, intellectual property is

getting more and more common for companies to use for their benefit.

Figure 2. Market value of Intangible Assets


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 3, 2025

328

Figure 3. Brand values of companies

As stated above, brand value is also an example of intangible assets, and it is an important part of

popular companies. Figure 3 shows the value of brands of companies, like apple, google,

Microsoft and others. According to the graph, Apple owns the highest amount of brand value,

accounting for almost 250 billion dollars, while the figure for McDonald’s takes the 10

th

place on

the graph, with 50 billion dollars. The indicators for Louis Vuitton, Samsung, Disney, Coca-Cola

and Facebook accounts up to 100 billion dollars. Other companies, Amazon, Microsoft and

Google made up maximum 200 billion dollars on the graph. From the information provided from

the graph, we can conclude that intangible assets play a crucial role within the company, and

they have their own value.

Conclusion:

To conclude, particularly in the technology industry, intangible assets, intellectual property have

emerged as a key factor in company success. Prominent IT businesses' case studies illustrate how

strategic IP management and protection may boost long-term profitability and offer substantial

competitive advantages. The market value increase and brand valuations of firms such as Apple

and Google demonstrate the evolution of intangible assets and highlight their growing

significance in today's business environment. The study also demonstrates how intangible assets

contribute to a company's improved financial success by directly influencing important financial

metrics like ROE, ROA, and ROIC. As businesses continue to embrace digital transformation,

the value of intangible assets will likely increase, making it essential for firms to accurately

assess, manage, and leverage their IP to maintain a competitive edge.

References:

1.

Qureshi, M. J., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2020). The effect of intangible assets on financial

performance, financial policies, and market value of technology firms: a global comparative

analysis.

Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting

,

12

(1), 26-57.

2.

Reilly, R. F. (2015). Technology Intangible Assets.

American Bankruptcy Institute

Journal

,

34

(10), 38.

3.

Lefebvre, L. A., Lefebvre, E., & Harvey, J. (1996). Intangible assets as determinants of


background image

https://ijmri.de/index.php/jmsi

volume 4, issue 3, 2025

329

advanced manufacturing technology adoption in SME's: toward an evolutionary model.

IEEE

Transactions on Engineering management

,

43

(3), 307-322.

4.

Li, H., & Wang, W. (2014). Impact of intangible assets on profitability of Hong Kong

listed information technology companies.

Business and Economic Research

,

4

(2), 98.

5.

Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (2005). Intangible assets and the economic impact of

computers.

Transforming enterprise: The economic and social implications of information

technology

, 27-48.

6.

Forero-Pineda, C. (2006). The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science

and technology in developing countries.

Research Policy

,

35

(6), 808-824.

7.

Rai, A. K. (1999). Intellectual property rights in biotechnology: Addressing new

technology.

Wake Forest L. Rev.

,

34

, 827.

8.

Falvey, R. E., Foster, N., & Memedovic, O. (2006).

The role of intellectual property

rights in technology transfer and economic growth: theory and evidence

. Geneva: UNIDO.

References

Qureshi, M. J., & Siddiqui, D. A. (2020). The effect of intangible assets on financial performance, financial policies, and market value of technology firms: a global comparative analysis. Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, 12(1), 26-57.

Reilly, R. F. (2015). Technology Intangible Assets. American Bankruptcy Institute Journal, 34(10), 38.

Lefebvre, L. A., Lefebvre, E., & Harvey, J. (1996). Intangible assets as determinants of advanced manufacturing technology adoption in SME's: toward an evolutionary model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering management, 43(3), 307-322.

Li, H., & Wang, W. (2014). Impact of intangible assets on profitability of Hong Kong listed information technology companies. Business and Economic Research, 4(2), 98.

Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (2005). Intangible assets and the economic impact of computers. Transforming enterprise: The economic and social implications of information technology, 27-48.

Forero-Pineda, C. (2006). The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries. Research Policy, 35(6), 808-824.

Rai, A. K. (1999). Intellectual property rights in biotechnology: Addressing new technology. Wake Forest L. Rev., 34, 827.

Falvey, R. E., Foster, N., & Memedovic, O. (2006). The role of intellectual property rights in technology transfer and economic growth: theory and evidence. Geneva: UNIDO.