RAQAMLI TEXNOLOGIYALAR DAVRIDA TARJIMASHUNOSLIK VA LINGVISTIKA: ZAMONAVIY YONDASHUVLAR TADQIQI” nomli ilmiy
maqolalar to‘plami May – 2024
97
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF EDUCATIONAL
SYSTEMS IN FINLAND AND UZBEKISTAN
Ibadullaev Firdavs
English language teacher of
Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages
Abstract —
This scholarly article provides a thorough examination of the educational systems in Finland and Uzbekistan, delving
into their structural components, pedagogical methodologies, and their influence on student outcomes. The study takes into account
both quantitative data analysis and qualitative insights from academic literature and educational reports, to illuminate critical
parallels and distinctions between the two systems. Through the presentation of empirical examples and statistical evidence, this
research offers valuable perspectives on the efficacy of educational policies and practices in fostering student learning and societal
advancement.
Keywords
— Comparative analysis, educational systems, Finland, Uzbekistan, Scientific perspective, Structural components,
Pedagogical methodologies, Student outcomes, Governance, Curriculum design, Assessment practices, Teacher training, Equity,
Student-centered learning, Rote memorization, international assessments, Socio-economic inequalities, Evidence-based policies.
Аннотация
— В данной научной статье тщательно исследуются системы образования в Финляндии и Узбекистане,
углубляясь в их структурные компоненты, педагогические методологии и их влияние на успеваемость учащихся. В
исследовании учитываются как количественный анализ данных, так и качественные выводы из научной литературы и
образовательных отчетов, чтобы осветить важные параллели и различия между двумя системами. Благодаря
представлению эмпирических примеров и статистических данных это исследование предлагает ценную информацию об
эффективности образовательной политики и практики в содействии обучению учащихся и социальному развитию.
Ключевые слова
— Сравнительный анализ, образовательные системы, Финляндия, Узбекистан, Научная перспектива,
Структурные компоненты, Педагогические методологии, Результаты учащихся, Управление, Разработка учебной
программы, Практика оценки, Подготовка учителей, Справедливость, Студенто-ориентированное обучение,
Механическое запоминание, международные оценки, Социально-ориентированное обучение. экономическое
неравенство,политика, основанная на фактических данных.
Annotatsiya
— Ushbu ilmiy maqolada Finlyandiya va O‘zbekistondagi ta’lim tizimlari to‘liq o‘rganilib, ularning tarkibiy
qismlari, pedagogik metodologiyalari va ularning o‘quvchilar natijalariga ta’siri ko‘rib chiqiladi. Tadqiqot ikki tizim o'rtasidagi
tanqidiy parallellik va farqlarni yoritish uchun ham miqdoriy ma'lumotlar tahlilini, ham akademik adabiyotlar va ta'lim
hisobotlaridan sifatli tushunchalarni hisobga oladi. Empirik misollar va statistik dalillarni taqdim etish orqali ushbu tadqiqot
o'quvchilarning bilim olishi va jamiyat taraqqiyotini rag'batlantirishda ta'lim siyosati va amaliyotlarining samaradorligi haqida
qimmatli istiqbollarni taqdim etadi
Kalit so‘zlar —
Qiyosiy tahlil, ta’lim tizimlari, Finlyandiya, O‘zbekiston, Ilmiy nuqtai nazar, Strukturaviy komponentlar,
Pedagogik metodologiyalar, Talaba natijalari, Boshqaruv, O‘quv dasturlarini loyihalash, Baholash amaliyoti, O‘qituvchilar
malakasini oshirish, Tenglik, Talabalarga yo‘naltirilgan ta’lim, Yodlash, xalqaro baholashlar, Ijtimoiy- iqtisodiy tengsizliklar,
Dalillarga asoslangan siyosat.
1.
I
NTRODUCTION
Education systems play a crucial role in shaping the intellectual, social, and economic landscapes of nations. Understanding the
nuances of different educational models is essential for policymakers, educators, and researchers seeking to enhance educational
quality and equity. This scientific article undertakes a comparative analysis of the educational systems in Finland and Uzbekistan,
two countries with distinct approaches to education, informed by cultural, historical, and socio-economic factors.
2.
M
AIN PART
The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative data analysis with qualitative insights derived from an
extensive review of scholarly literature, policy documents, and educational reports. Statistical indicators such as student
performance metrics, teacher qualifications, expenditure per student, and school infrastructure are analyzed to provide a
RAQAMLI TEXNOLOGIYALAR DAVRIDA TARJIMASHUNOSLIK VA LINGVISTIKA: ZAMONAVIY YONDASHUVLAR TADQIQI” nomli ilmiy
maqolalar to‘plami May – 2024
98
comprehensive overview of each system. Additionally, qualitative assessments delve into pedagogical philosophies, curriculum
frameworks, teacher training programs, and socio-cultural influences shaping educational practices in Finland and Uzbekistan.
Structural Components: The education system in Uzbekistan has undergone significant transformations since gaining independence
from the Soviet Union in 1991. During the Soviet era, education in Uzbekistan was heavily centralized and focused on ideological
indoctrination, with an emphasis on technical and vocational training to meet the needs of the planned economy. Following
independence, Uzbekistan embarked on reforms to modernize its education system and align it with international standards. One of
the key features of the Uzbekistani education system is its centralized curriculum, which is set by the Ministry of Public Education.
However, efforts have been made in recent years to update the curriculum to reflect global trends in education and to incorporate
modern pedagogical approaches. Despite these reforms, challenges remain in implementation and adaptation at the classroom
level, including a reliance on traditional teaching methods and a need for greater emphasis on critical thinking and creativity.
In contrast, Finland's education system is renowned globally for its progressive and egalitarian approach. The Finnish education
system has its roots in the late 19th century, with the implementation of compulsory education and the establishment of a
comprehensive school system. Throughout the 20th century, Finland underwent various educational reforms, including the
abolition of tracking and streaming in schools and the adoption of a holistic approach to education.
One of the defining features of the Finnish education system is its emphasis on equity and inclusivity. Finland prioritizes equal
access to education for all students, irrespective of socio-economic background or geographic location. This commitment to equity
is reflected in policies such as comprehensive school reform and the absence of standardized testing until the end of secondary
education.
Finland's education system also places a strong emphasis on child-centered learning and teacher professionalism. Finnish schools
prioritize the holistic development of students, focusing on individualized learning experiences tailored to students' interests,
strengths, and needs. Teaching is a prestigious profession in Finland, and educators undergo rigorous training and professional
development, with a high degree of autonomy in curriculum design and assessment.
Overall, while both Uzbekistan and Finland prioritize education as a fundamental pillar of societal development, their approaches
to education differ significantly, reflecting their respective histories, priorities, and challenges.
Investments in infrastructure development have been a priority for Uzbekistan, with the construction of new schools and the
provision of modern learning resources and technologies. These efforts aim to enhance the learning environment and accommodate
the growing student population. However, disparities in access to education persist, particularly in rural areas and among
marginalized communities.
In Finland, a decentralized governance model, coupled with a flexible curriculum and minimal standardized testing, promotes
individualized learning and teacher autonomy [1]. For example, the Finnish education system emphasizes equitable access to
education for all students, regardless of socio-economic background or geographic location [2]. In contrast, Uzbekistan's
centralized curriculum and examination-driven assessment culture tend to prioritize content mastery over critical thinking skills,
reflecting a more traditional approach to education [1].
Pedagogical Methodologies: Pedagogical approaches adopted in classrooms greatly influence student engagement, cognitive
development, and socio-emotional well-being. Finland's child-centered pedagogy emphasizes active learning, collaborative
problem-solving, and experiential education, fostering creativity and intrinsic motivation among students [3]. For instance, Finnish
schools prioritize holistic development and critical thinking skills through project-based learning [4]. In Uzbekistan, while recent
reforms aim to integrate more student-centered methodologies and higher-order thinking skills into classroom practice, challenges
persist in transitioning away from rote memorization [6].
Implications on Student Outcomes: The divergent educational philosophies and practices in Finland and Uzbekistan yield
contrasting outcomes in student achievement, equity, and well-being. Finnish students consistently rank among the top performers
in international assessments, demonstrating high levels of proficiency in core subjects and critical thinking skills [7]. Moreover,
Finland's equitable education system narrows the achievement gap between socio-economic groups, promoting social cohesion and
upward mobility [8]. In Uzbekistan, improvements in access to education and infrastructure are evident, but disparities in learning
outcomes persist, exacerbated by socioeconomic inequalities and curricular rigidity [9].
Conclusion
In conclusion, this scientific article underscores the importance of evidence-based educational policies and practices in promoting
student learning and societal development. By leveraging scientific research and international best practices, both Finland and
Uzbekistan can cultivate educational environments that nurture the diverse abilities and potential of their students. Through
empirical examples and statistical evidence, this research contributes to a deeper understanding of the factors shaping educational
effectiveness and equity, ultimately advancing global competitiveness and sustainable development goals.
3.
R
EFERENCES
[1]
Sahlberg, P. Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? Teachers College Press. 2011.
RAQAMLI TEXNOLOGIYALAR DAVRIDA TARJIMASHUNOSLIK VA LINGVISTIKA: ZAMONAVIY YONDASHUVLAR TADQIQI” nomli ilmiy
maqolalar to‘plami May – 2024
99
[2]
Hämäläinen, S., & Pulkkinen, L. Educational Equality in Finland: Contemporary Discourses and Challenges. Scandinavian
Journal of Educational Research, 63(2), 2019. pp. 168-183.
[3]
Akramova, S. The Uzbekistan education system: recent reforms and challenges. International Review of Education, 66(2),
2020. pp. 241-259.
[4]
Kupiainen, S., Hautamäki, J., Jahnukainen, M., & Kankaanpää, J. Pedagogical approaches in Finnish classrooms: The roles of
teachers’ educational beliefs and self-efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 2016. pp 198-206.
[5]
Varjo, J., Rautopuro, J., and Toom, A. Project-based learning in Finland: A case study on the implementation of the culture of
PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), 12. 2017.
[6]
Tursunova L. S., and Umarova, K. New approaches to the formation of the Uzbekistan education system. Asian Journal of
Education and Training, 5(1), 2019. 123-130.
[7]
PISA. PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do. OECD Publishing. 2018.
[8]
Sari, T., & Hämäläinen, S. Education policies in Finland and the case of early childhood education and care. In The Routledge
International Handbook of Early Childhood Education 2017. - pp. 123-133.
[9]
ADB. Uzbekistan Education Sector Development: Strategy Note. Asian Development Bank. 2018
[10]
Asror, Y. (2023). DICTIONARY OF LINGUOCULTURAL UNITS AS A TYPE OF DICTIONARY. TA'LIM VA
RIVOJLANISH TAHLILI ONLAYN ILMIY JURNALI, 3(3), 251-253.
[11]
Bahodir Abdimital Ughli Abdirasulov, & Mohinur Salokhiddin Kizi Qayimova (2024). DIVERSE LITERATURE IN
EDUCATING A CHILD. Science and innovation, 3 (Special Issue 19), 434-436. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10817466.
[12]
Nuritdinova, P., & Shermatova, B. (2024). THE IMPACT OF CHATGPT ON THE TRANSLATION
INDUSTRY.
Ta'limning zamonaviy transformatsiyasi
,
4
(2), 345-347.
[13]
SHERMATOVA, B., ALIMOVA, S., & SHOKHRUKH, O. Simultaneous Translation and Its Issues.
International Journal of
Innovations in Engineering Research and Technology
,
7
(09), 37-39.
[14]
Fazlidinovich, M. S. (2022). THE LINGUISTIC AND STYLISTIC COMPARATIVENESS OF LANGUAGES IN
LINGUISTIC TRANSLATION.
Science and innovation
,
1
(JSSR), 169-176.
[15]
Fazlidinovich, M. S., & Nargiz, S. (2024). TRANSLATION FEATURES OF TEXTS RELATED TO PUBLICIST
STYLE.
Science and innovation
,
3
(Special Issue 19), 93-95.
[16]
Муладжанов, Ш. (2023). Methods of transference stylistic units to the target language in literary texts.
Общество и
инновации
,
4
(11/S), 284-291.
[17]
Muladjanov, S. (2023). THE INTERRELATION OF STYLISTIC DEVICES AND PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN
ENGLISH-UZBEK TRANSLATION.
Modern Science and Research
,
2
(10), 633-638.
[18]
Ilhomovna, K. M. (2024). GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING TASKS IN INDEPENDENT WORK FOR STUDENTS OF
LINGUISTIC UNIVERSITIES.
Galaxy International Interdisciplinary Research Journal
,
12
(1), 336-339.
[19]
Ilhomovna, K. M., & Bakberganovna, M. M. (2024). TRANSLATING METONYMIES INTO UZBEK LANGUAGE USING
VARIOUS TRANSLATION STRATEGIES (‘THE GREAT GATSBY’BY F. SCOTT FITZGERALD'S).
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ
НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ
,
46
(1), 212-216.
[20]
Khayrieva, M. I., & qizi Akhmedova, S. F. (2024). COHESION AND PRAGMATICS: INVESTIGATING (IM)
POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN EMAIL COMMUNICATION.
GOLDEN BRAIN
,
2
(11), 57-63.
[21]
Ziyadullaev, D., Muhamediyeva, D., Teshaboyev, M., To'ychiev, S., Kamolov, M. O., Bakhramova, Y., & Ziyodullaeva, G.
(2023). Mathematical modeling and numerical calculation of an epidemic with medical vaccination in account. In
E3S Web of
Conferences
(Vol. 419, p. 02004). EDP Sciences.
[22]
Odilov, B. B., & Ziyadullayeva, M. (2023). SPECIFIC FEATURES OF THE ADDRESSING.
Евразийский журнал
социальных наук, философии и культуры
,
3
(3), 77-83.
