This study offers a comprehensive investigation into the extent to which peer assessment contributes to the development of speaking communication skills among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Employing a quasi-experimental design, the research involved 60 university-level EFL students who were systematically assigned to either an experimental group or a control group. Over an eight-week intervention period, the experimental group participated in a series of structured peer-assessment cycles in which learners evaluated one another’s speaking performances using criterion-referenced rubrics and guided feedback protocols. In contrast, the control group engaged in the same speaking tasks but received only traditional instructor-provided feedback. Multiple data sources—including pre- and post-instruction speaking tests, learner-perception questionnaires, and weekly reflective journals—were triangulated to gather both quantitative and qualitative evidence. The findings revealed a marked and statistically significant improvement among the experimental group across key dimensions of oral competence, specifically fluency, coherence of ideas, communicative confidence, and strategic use of language. Learners who engaged in peer assessment not only demonstrated stronger post-test performance compared to their control-group counterparts but also displayed heightened metacognitive awareness, greater self-regulation, and increased motivation to improve their speaking proficiency. Qualitative analyses further indicated that the peer-assessment process fostered deeper engagement with speaking tasks, encouraged critical listening, and cultivated a more collaborative learning environment. Taken together, these results suggest that peer assessment functions as a powerful pedagogical mechanism for enhancing speaking communication skills in EFL contexts. Beyond serving as an alternative assessment strategy, it operates as a formative learning tool that empowers students to internalize performance criteria, refine communicative strategies, and take greater ownership of their oral language development. The study underscores the pedagogical value of incorporating structured peer-feedback practices into language curricula and offers implications for designing more interactive, learner-centered approaches to speaking instruction.
This study offers a comprehensive investigation into the extent to which peer assessment contributes to the development of speaking communication skills among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Employing a quasi-experimental design, the research involved 60 university-level EFL students who were systematically assigned to either an experimental group or a control group. Over an eight-week intervention period, the experimental group participated in a series of structured peer-assessment cycles in which learners evaluated one another’s speaking performances using criterion-referenced rubrics and guided feedback protocols. In contrast, the control group engaged in the same speaking tasks but received only traditional instructor-provided feedback. Multiple data sources—including pre- and post-instruction speaking tests, learner-perception questionnaires, and weekly reflective journals—were triangulated to gather both quantitative and qualitative evidence. The findings revealed a marked and statistically significant improvement among the experimental group across key dimensions of oral competence, specifically fluency, coherence of ideas, communicative confidence, and strategic use of language. Learners who engaged in peer assessment not only demonstrated stronger post-test performance compared to their control-group counterparts but also displayed heightened metacognitive awareness, greater self-regulation, and increased motivation to improve their speaking proficiency. Qualitative analyses further indicated that the peer-assessment process fostered deeper engagement with speaking tasks, encouraged critical listening, and cultivated a more collaborative learning environment. Taken together, these results suggest that peer assessment functions as a powerful pedagogical mechanism for enhancing speaking communication skills in EFL contexts. Beyond serving as an alternative assessment strategy, it operates as a formative learning tool that empowers students to internalize performance criteria, refine communicative strategies, and take greater ownership of their oral language development. The study underscores the pedagogical value of incorporating structured peer-feedback practices into language curricula and offers implications for designing more interactive, learner-centered approaches to speaking instruction.
Brookfield, S. D. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. Jossey-Bass.
Ennis, R. H. (2018). Critical thinking across the curriculum: A vision. Topoi, 37(1), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4
Facione, P. A. (2020). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (8th ed.). Measured Reasons LLC.
Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Scriven, M., & Paul, R. (2007). Defining critical thinking. Foundation for Critical Thinking.
https://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/defining-critical-thinking/766
Taglieber, L. K. (2019). Critical thinking in the EFL classroom: The role of task-based learning. ELT Journal, 73(3), 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccz015
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Willingham, D. T. (2007). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to teach? American Educator, 31(2), 8–19.
Низамов Ғ. М. Используя информационно-коммуникационные технологии, человек способен уравнивать местоимения с помощью предложений //Conference Zone. – 2023. – С. 67-69.
Nizamov G. M. Improving the professional competenceofstudents in the specialty by teachingforeignlanguages //Научные исследования и общественные проблемы. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 1. – С. 148-150.
Низамов Ғ. М., Турсунова М., Мамаражабов С. М. Олий таълим муассасаларида касбий коммуникатив омилкорликни шакллантириш натижасида экспериментал гуруҳда касбий коммуникатив омилкорликнинг ривожлантириш босқичлари //Agrobiotexnologiya va veterinariya tibbiyoti ilmiy jurnali. – 2022. – С. 996-999.
Nizamov M. Axborot kommunikatsiya texnologiyalari vositasida huquqni muhofaza qiluvchi organlarda faoliyat yurutuvchilarning kasbiy kommunikativ komtetensiyasini rivojlantirish xorijiy tilning ahamiyati //Interpretation and researches. - 2024. - Т. 2. - С. 24.
Низамов Ғ. М., Тагаева З. С., Мамаражабов С. М. Ахборот-коммуникация технологиялари воситасида чет тилини ўрганиш жараёнида аграномия мутахассислиги талабаларининг касбий коммуникатив омилкорлигини шакллантириш воситалари //Agrobiotexnologiya va veterinariya tibbiyoti ilmiy jurnali. – 2022. – С. 992-995.
Низамов Ғ. М., Холмирзаева З. О., Мамаражабов С. М. Олий таълим муассасаларида чет тилини ўқитиш жараёнида номутахассис таълим йўналиши талабаларининг касбий коммуникатив омилкорлигини шакллантириш услублари //Agrobiotexnologiya va veterinariya tibbiyoti ilmiy jurnali. – 2022. – С. 988-991.
Nizamov G. M. Methods of forming the professional communicative facility of the students of the field of education in the process of teaching a foreign language in higher education institutions //ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. – 2022. – Т. 12. – №. 10. – С. 165-167.
Nizamov G. M. Important factors and efficiency of using communicative methodology in the process of teaching a foreign language, together with the criteria of professional communicative effectiveness //Conference Zone. – 2022. – С. 155-159.
Nizamov G. M. Important principles of foreign language learning training systems in the development of students’ professional communicative competences //Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research. – 2022. – Т. 11. – №. 10. – С. 111-113.
Nurmuxammedovna, S. G. (2024, December). NEMIS TILIDA MATN SARLAVHASINING O‘ZIGA XOS XUSUSIYATLARI. In International Conference (Vol. 1, No. 9, pp. 29-32).
Nurmuxammedovna, S. G. (2024, December). NEMIS VA O’ZBEK TILI PAREMIOLOGIK BIRLIKLAR, ULAR O’RTASIDAGI O’XSHASHLIKLAR. In International Conference (Vol. 1, No. 9, pp. 25-28).