The American Journal of Applied Sciences
94
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
94-116
10.37547/tajas/Volume07Issue08-08
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
20 June 2025
ACCEPTED
16 July 2025
PUBLISHED
18 August 2025
VOLUME
Vol.07 Issue08 2025
CITATION
Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Maham Saeed, Keya Karabi Roy, & Kami Yangzen Lama.
(2025). Digital transformation in hospitals: evaluating the ROI of IT
investments in health systems. The American Journal of Applied Sciences,
7(8), 94
–
116. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajas/Volume07Issue08-08
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Digital transformation in
hospitals: evaluating the
ROI of IT investments in
health systems
Kazi Sanwarul Azim
Doctor of Business Administration, International American University, Los
Angeles, California, USA
Maham Saeed
Master of Science in Healthcare Management, St. FRANCIS COLLEGE,
Brooklyn, New York
Keya Karabi Roy
Master of Science in Healthcare Management, St. FRANCIS COLLEGE,
Brooklyn, New York
Kami Yangzen Lama
Department of Information Technology, Washington University of Science
and Technology (wust), 2900 Eisenhower Ave, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA
Abstract:
Digital transformation of hospitals is
transforming the provision of healthcare services
through the incorporation of sophisticated information
technologies
into
clinical,
operational,
and
administrative hospital systems. However, even with
such heavy investments in the digital health
infrastructure, one everything seems to be persistently
missing: the ability to accurately assess the return on
investment (ROI) of such technologies both in financial
performance and patient care outcomes. The research
question of this paper is the ROI of IT investments in
hospitals; the multidimensionality of the impact of
digital systems (Electronic Health Records, Clinical
Decision Support Systems, telemedicine platforms, and
data analytics dashboards) will be considered. With the
quantitative research design, the research study will
examine the data provided on the financial reports of
the hospital, operational and clinical outcome indicator
data to quantify the cost-effectiveness and value-
creating measures. The main findings indicate that
hospitals at the stage of a developed digital ecosystem
are characterized by a significant increase in budget
efficiency, a decrease in errors, an increased
productivity of the staff, and an increase in the recovery
rates of patients. Another revelation of the study is that
ROI is not just about financial benefit but also includes
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
95
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
benefits
in
workflow
streamlining,
decision
correctness, and long-term viability. This study adds to
this div of evidence by synthesizing, in financial,
clinical, and operational spheres, an overall structure
of IT investment assessment in health systems. This
research is also novel because of its data science
approach, cross-functional analysis, and prescriptive
recommendations that can be used by hospital
managers and health policymakers. The results
highlight a strong necessity of systematic ROI
assessment plans that will direct prospective digital
spending plans and align them with institutional
objectives. The paper is an essential source of
reference in accelerating evidence-based IT adoption
in healthcare and achieving optimum value on digital
transformation initiatives.
Keywords:
Digital Transformation, Hospital IT
Investments, ROI Evaluation, Healthcare Technology,
Health Systems.
1.
Introduction
The face of the contemporary healthcare sector is
changing tremendously, and this alteration is because
of the incorporation of digital technologies into
hospital systems. Whether it is patient admission
through clinical diagnostics or administrative
processes to discharge planning, hospitals are
increasingly integrating digital technologies to
enhance service delivery and efficiency in their
operations. Compared with the past, when pursuing
digital transformation was an issue of innovation by
prestige, today it has become a strategic necessity of
hospitals aiming to improve the quality of care, lower
expenses, and be sustainable in an increasingly
competitive and resource-scarce setting. Due to
increasingly sophisticated and large global health
challenges, there is an increasing pressure on health
systems to achieve more with less, and leaders have
turned to information technology as a foundation of
healthcare reform.
Hospitals are especially spending lots of money on all
manner of digital technology including Electronic
Health Records (EHRs), Clinical Decision Support
Systems (CDSS), telemedicine systems, real-time data
analytics dashboards, and artificial intelligence-based
diagnostics. These technologies will help to transform
the functioning of hospitals by offering data-driven
decision-making, preventing medical errors, improving
workflow, and promoting the smooth coordination of
multidisciplinary teams. Yet, as the hype and
investment bubbles around digital health efforts
continue to expand, one major question seems to be
left unanswered: how can the administrators and
interested parties in hospitals quantify the real return
on investment (ROI) of these information technology
(IT) investments in a tangible, holistic, and verifiable
manner?
The issue of ROI measurement of IT investments in
hospitals is a financial as well as a strategic issue. Some
of the advantages of digitization can be quantified
easily, like the amount of paperwork reduced or the
speed of the billing cycle, others cannot be so easily
measured, like better clinical decision making or patient
satisfaction. Besides, most hospitals have difficulty in
attributing positively changing care delivery to a certain
technological intervention, particularly when the
change comes along with other organizational
transformations or policy changes. Because of this, the
real returns on digital investments are frequently
unknown or understated, and it can be much harder to
enable decision-makers to justify a new initiative or
expand a successful one to other departments or
facilities.
The paper will discuss the fact that there is an urgent
need to establish a holistic approach to measuring ROI
of digital transformation in hospitals. It will seek to
determine and measure the economic, clinical, and
operational returns that are brought in by significant IT
investments. This way, the study transforms the debate
on technology adoption to the real influence on
institutional performance and sustainability. Through a
data-driven and multidisciplinary method, this paper
offers a guideline on assessing the role of digital health
systems in promoting financial sustainability, improved
patient outcomes, and efficient operational processes
within the hospital environment.
The main issue of this study is the absence of a standard
and universally acknowledged approaches to the
measurement of ROI in healthcare IT. Corporate ROI
models, which are otherwise popular, do not always
suffice to appreciate the subtle advantages of health
technologies, particularly those with a long-term payoff
or that take non-financial form, such as a decreased
clinical risk or an increased patient trust. In addition, the
fact that hospitals vary in terms of their size and
structure, with some being small rural clinics and others
being large tertiary care facilities, creates an additional
difficulty in achieving standardized metrics. The present
paper, therefore, endeavors to develop a realistic,
though adaptable structure, which takes into
consideration such variances and which has quantifiable
indicators, which can be applied in various institutional
settings.
The main question that needs to be answered in the
proposed study is how hospitals can evaluate and
optimize the value of digital technologies. In particular,
it assesses the indirect and direct effects of IT systems
on three key areas, including financial efficiency, clinical
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
96
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
effectiveness, and operational performance. The
strategic implications of ROI evaluations on the
hospital governance and the budgeting practices and
technology planning in the future are also factors
taken into account in the research. This paper
contributes to the closure of the gap between the
theoretical concepts of IT value and actual healthcare
management
decision-making
environment
by
drawing attention to the real-world data and
performance measures.
The study fits into the developing discussion of digital
health with practical recommendations to guide
healthcare
administrators,
policy-makers,
and
technology vendors. Although much of the past
research and literature has highlighted the
technological capacity of the hospital IT systems, very
little research has attempted to critically examine and
question whether the technologies are providing
equitable and long-term value relative to the resources
pumped into them. This paper fills that gap by showing
on what basis IT investment produce the best ROI,
which metrics best reflect value creation, and which
institutional practices contribute to a successful digital
transformation.
The specialty of this paper is the holistic approach.
Rather than assessing technology as a standalone
aspect, the analysis involves observation of IT
investments in interaction with other organizational
elements
staffing
models,
workflow
design,
compliance regulations, and patient demographics.
Such a combined view enables a more precise and
subtle perception of the effects of digital
transformation on the ecosystems of hospitals in
general. Another critical area highlighted in the paper
is the issue of strategic alignment- the need to make
sure that IT investments are not just hyped by the
trends but are grounded on the larger mission of the
hospital, its goals and its resource capacity.
Conclusively, with the steady rise in the digitization
rate of the healthcare systems, hospitals are under
growing pressure to not only justify their IT spending,
but also to execute them in a strategically
advantageous manner. Having the capacity to measure
the ROI of digital investments is important in informing
resource
distribution,
producing
greater
accountability, and fostering the creation of long-term
value. The paper will provide a quantitative analysis of
the challenges and opportunities that exist in ensuring
that hospitals assess and achieve the maximum
potential of digital transformation initiatives. It will
facilitate more informed decision-making and more
sustainable innovation in healthcare delivery by filling
the measurement gap and offering a replicable
framework.
2.
Literature Review
Hospitals are undergoing a major change in providing
healthcare because of the advancements in information
technology. Although EHRs, telemedicine, and using
data analytics in medicine are expected to make things
easier and safer for patients, averaging out their success
and costs continues to be tough. Various research
studies reveal the real and abstract advantages of
healthcare IT, but there are still difficulties in examining
these benefits.
The financial impacts of using EHR systems are seen as
positive, but also negative at the same time. In addition,
studies by Adler-Milstein et al. and Furukawa et al.
proved that advanced EHRs helped hospitals secure 3%
less extra spending and also earned a 5% raise in their
efficiency of billing. Still, these initial deployment
expenses are so high that they pose a problem for
smaller institutions, who have to spend between
$15,000 and $70,000 per physician. A number of studies
point out that EHRs save money over time by reducing
data transcription mistakes and simplifying how
frontline workers do their jobs, while some hospitals
have difficulty meeting their costs because of the high
expenses of keeping these systems up to date.
Important advantages can be found in the clinical
setting as well. Bates et al. revealed that
implementation of CDSS decreased the risk of
medication errors by 27%, and Chaudhry et al. explained
that using CPOE dropped the chances of adverse drug
events by 55%. Telemedicine makes care easier to get,
as a study cited by Bashshur et al. revealed a 22%
decline in the number of readmissions. Even so, the way
clinicians use the system and integrate it with daily tasks
can affect outcomes, so some institutions do not notice
much change.
There is ample evidence showing that operations have
become more efficient. Vest and Gamm noticed that the
number of unneeded imaging tests went down by 15%
because of Health Information Exchanges (HIEs), and
Amarasingham et al. explain how predictive analytics
decreased ICU mortality by 18%. Even though there are
several benefits, staff pushing back and cyberthreats
prevent these hospitals from reaching ideal
performance. It is still a problem that hospitals with
interconnected technology achieve around 30% higher
efficiency than those with technology that works
separately.
Such technologies as portals and mobile apps support
ROI by helping patients show up for their appointments
and by increasing treatment compliance. According to
Graetz et al., automated reminders led to a 12%
increase in using preventive care, and Zhao et al. noted
that the reminders helped drop missed appointments
by 20%. Yet, since elderly and low-income people tend
to be less tech-savvy, this cuts down on how useful
digital health can be for them.
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
97
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
Different ways of measuring ROI make it hard to
compare results between institutions. Traditional
approaches do not take into account the satisfaction of
patients. One of the downsides with the Balanced
Scorecard is that it uses non-financial data, but is not
used by all companies. Even though Menachemi et al.
proposed using cost-benefit analysis together with
QALYs, most hospitals continue with using their own
metrics.
To earn the highest ROI, a company needs its strategies
to be well coordinated. Glandon and colleagues
discovered that digital strategies in hospitals allow
them to address particular issues and earn higher
productivity. Meanwhile, if companies adopt a reactive
strategy, they can end up with fewer profits down the
road. Leaders also have a big role; Topaz et al. claimed
that executive commitment was the best predictor for
the successful use of EHRs.
Still, it is difficult to connect healthcare databases,
despite important efforts like the 21st Century Cures
Act. Although EHRs help with collecting data, it is
complicated to share that information because
systems are not fully connected. Blumenthal et al.
explained the importance of using standardized data
formats, but it is still hard to move forward due to
competition between vendors.
People are still worried about the long-term
sustainability of digital systems. According to Buntin et
al., expenses associated with EHRs declined only in the
first five years, which means they keep researchers
looking for new ways to improve. In the same way,
software lifespan and update expenses can lower the
value achieved in the long run, as noticed by Miller and
Sim.
AI and blockchain provide opportunities with new
chances to increase their ROI. Jiang et al. say that AI
makes it possible to interpret findings 30% faster than
before, while Kuo et al. indicate that blockchain
enhances the clarity of supply chain activities. Since
putting these systems in place is expensive and
regulations are stiff, they are not used by most
businesses.
Looking at outcomes from a patient’s viewpoint is now
a top priority. According to Black et al., telehealth brings
peak satisfaction to patients, and according to Walker et
al., integrating systems between organizations
smoothens the process of care coordination. DesRoches
et al. still point out that problems with usability can
make clinicians unhappy.
When viewed from a global level, people have unequal
access to specific digital tools. While those in low-
resource settings struggle with infrastructure, Cresswell
and Sheikh³⁷ explained that organizational culture is one
of the main things that affects results.
Policies made by governments are very important.
Because of the HITECH Act, the adoption of EHRs grew
faster, yet Kruse et al.³⁸
noted that rural hospitals are
still facing some gaps. Williams et al.³⁹ agreed that
unequal funding practices keep people apart from the
Internet.
Respecting privacy in data plays a key role in
determining the ROI. According to Price and Cohen, data
breaches contribute to a fall in patient trust. On the
other hand, Adler-
Milstein and Pfeifer⁴¹ said that
improving cybersecurity is crucial for healthcare
organizations.
Preparation of teams continues to be overlooked by
companies. Jha et al. mention that good staff skills
influence the success of an IT strategy, but only a few
institutions focus on keeping their staff well-trained.
According to Kaplan and Norton, it is necessary to use
balanced indicators, and Kaushal et al. pointed out that
involvement by clinicians is just as significant as
technology.
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
98
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
Figure 01:
Key ROI dimensions in hospital IT investments.
Figure Description
: This figure presents a conceptual
mind map outlining the four core dimensions of ROI
from
hospital
IT
systems
—
Financial,
Clinical,
Operational, and Strategic. Each branch displays real-
world performance metrics such as cost-savings (3
–
10%), medication error reduction (27
–
38%), and
interoperability gains (+30%), derived from existing
literature.
3.
Methodology
In this paper, the quantitative, cross-sectional research
design was used to assess the return on investment
(ROI) of digital transformation projects in the hospital
setting. The study sought to determine quantifiable
effects on three main areas; financial performance,
clinical outcome and operational efficiency. It relied on
data-driven methodology to obtain empirical evidence
across several hospitals that have adopted substantial
IT applications including Electronic Health Records
(EHRs), Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS),
telemedicine platforms, predictive analytics tools, and
integrated Health Information Exchanges (HIEs). The
study diverse institutions in terms of their capacity,
resource distribution, and digital maturity by choosing
hospitals of different sizes and specialization, including
regional medical centers and tertiary-level urban
hospitals. This enabled wider generalization of the
results to other health systems of varying structural
and demographic make up.
In order to adhere to the strict ethical compliance
requirements, the research design emphasis was put
on institutional transparency and anonymization of the
data. Before data was collected, all the participating
hospitals gave a written agreement to the use of
anonymized datasets pertaining to their IT investments,
operational performance indicators and patient care
outcomes. The study did not access any personally
identifiable information (PII) or protected health
information (PHI). An ethical clearance was obtained,
via a health services research ethics board, in regards to
the proceedings of the study in respect to the sensitivity
of the data, confidentiality to the organizations and the
sensitive nature of hospital level performance data.
Moreover, the study included institutional training on
data ethics and digital privacy policies to all study staff
(data analysts and field researchers) so that they can be
totally compliant with international regulations,
including the General Data Protection Regulation
(GDPR) and the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA), wherever they are
applicable.
There were three streamlined data collection processes.
Firstly, they gathered financial information based on
hospital accounting systems and budgetary reports,
capital and operational IT expenditures included. This
covered hardware purchases, software licenses, IT
support contracts, employee training, vendor support
contracts and cyber security expenditure. These cost
data were further compared with any financial
performance indicator like the revenue cycle efficiency,
claim reimbursement schedules, administrative cost
ratio, and information technology-related savings of
paper-based processes. Second, EHR databases and
clinical dashboards were extracted to obtain clinical
outcome data. These data were medication error rates,
readmission rates of patients within 30 days, average
length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) mortality rates,
and adverse drug event rates. To preserve the identity
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
99
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
of the patients, only non-traceable aggregated data
were used. Third, the measures of operational
efficiency were obtained based on workforce
management software and departmental performance
logs. The main variables were the time spent on
nursing documentation, the number of patients that
could be passed through the system on average per day,
the rate of duplicate diagnostic tests and staff
scheduling efficiency scores.
Figure 02: Flowchart of the study’s methodology for evaluating hospital IT ROI.
Figure Description
: This flowchart visualizes the step-
by-step methodological process: starting from hospital
selection, followed by baseline and post-IT data
collection, validation, statistical analysis, and result
interpretation. Each phase is annotated with relevant
activities, reflecting the study
’s structured and
replicable research design.
In order to assure comparability and analytical rigor, all
data points were gathered in two time periods, pre-
implementation (baseline) and post-implementation
(at least one year after full deployment) of IT systems.
Such time comparison allowed a longitudinal
perspective on IT effectiveness without the actual
multi-year tracing, which is hardly possible in practical
research because of institutional restrictions. Before-
and-after comparisons also served to eliminate the
impact of other factors on the effect of digital
technologies, including seasonal variation, staffing, or
administrative policy changes.
A mix of descriptive and inferential statistics was
applied to perform the statistical analysis. The
descriptive statistics were used to elaborate on the
central tendencies, variances, and ranges of the ROI
indicators among various hospitals. Paired sample t-
tests were considered as inferential techniques to
determine whether there were any significant changes
in performance measures over time, whereas linear
regression models were used to predict the extent to
which a particular IT investment affected financial,
clinical, or operational outcomes. The ROI was
determined through a standardized model that
incorporated net benefit (benefit less cost) and a time-
adjusted value denominator to consider the effect of
time span of deployment and slow benefit recognition.
Traditional ROI ratios, as well as the modified models
taking into account non-financial benefits, including
enhanced patient satisfaction and workflow flexibility,
were tried in order to reflect the multidimensional
nature of hospital performance.
The reliability and the validity of the data were
addressed in several ways. Triangulation was
accomplished by comparing data across sources (e.g.,
financial reports vs. dashboard metrics) to ensure
consistency.
Where
differences
arose,
data
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
100
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
reconciliations were conducted by means of structured
interviews of IT managers and financial officers.
Moreover, in order to address institutional reporting
bias, anonymized benchmarking was used throughout
the sample so that each hospital could compare its ROI
calculations with peer performance, but without
identifying information. This also permitted the cross-
institutional learning and aided in the validation of
results with the real-world performance trends.
Lastly, the whole methodology was carefully recorded
in a detailed way to make it replicable. All the steps,
starting with data request templates and coding
frameworks up to statistical formulas and data
cleaning procedures, were stored and provided as
supplementary material. Such transparency not only
adds to the integrity of the research but also
encourages other scholars and leaders of other
hospitals to replicate the methodology in dissimilar
ROI assessments in different contexts. This
methodology makes it possible to create a strong
foundation of actionable information about how
digital transformation can generate measurable
returns in hospital systems, as it bases the research on
strong ethics, transparent processes, and strict
statistical procedures.
4.
Financial Roi and Budget Efficiency Through It
Systems
Financial return on investment (ROI) of hospital IT
systems has emerged as a focal point of interest to
healthcare administrators in an attempt to rationalize
the increasing technology spending. With hospitals
moving out of their legacy systems and into a fully
digitized infrastructure, the financial implication of
such a move is enormous, including the purchase of
hardware, software licenses, maintaining the
infrastructure, training of staff, and cybersecurity
framework. However, these initial costs when well-
planned can save substantial amount of money in the
long run through decreased operating cost, better
billing, less mistakes and better resource use. This
section will discuss the ways in which hospitals have
achieved budget efficiencies and actual financial
benefits, brought about by adoption of a range of IT
tools, both in terms of direct and indirect cost saving
mechanisms.
Automation of various processes in the hospital is one
of the fastest financial payoffs of digital transformation
in hospitals. Correspondingly, by substituting paper-
based documentation systems with Electronic Health
Records (EHRs), physical storage, paper forms, and
manual data entry are no longer necessary, which
saves on material expenses and makes administrative
staff available to conduct more valuable work. The
revenue cycle is also optimized through automated
coding and billing that speed up the process of claims
processing, decrease coding mistakes, and decrease
claim denials. Most hospitals which have adopted the
end-to-end digital billing processes have testified that
they experience a discernible reduction in the revenue
cycle log jams that enable them to accelerate their cash
flow and also make better financial predictions. These
advances also lessen the dependence on outsider
revenue cycle management vendors, thus trimming
outsourcing expenditures.
Besides lessening the administrative load, IT systems
give hospitals a chance to adopt advanced financial
analytics applications that provide profound insights
into their spending trends, procurement wastefulness,
and budgetary anomalies. Real-time dashboards
showing aggregates of expenditure data by department
can enable financial officers to monitor deviations and
spot cost-saving opportunities and to optimise
budgetary allocations. As an illustration, by means of
connecting procurement systems with inventory
control, hospitals will be able to prevent over-
purchasing of medical supplies, minimize waste, and
utilize better vendor management by capitalizing on
volume discounts. Predictive analytics can also be used
to predict demand and hence help hospitals to staff,
order supplies and plan to provide services to patients
in a more cost-effective manner.
Another vital constituent of financial ROI in digital
health is cost avoidance. CDSS and CPOE tools assist in
avoidance of drug mistakes, redundant tests, and
unnecessary imaging, which have huge economic
consequences. Hospitals can prevent the costs of
litigation, regulatory fines, and unreimbursed care
expenses by decreasing medical errors, and adverse
drug events. Moreover, these technologies will result in
reduced
patient
readmissions
and
shorter
hospitalizations, which also reduce the cost of care
delivery. Even though these advantages do not come as
line entries in accounting books, they factor into the
overall budget effectiveness by avoiding unnecessary
costs that would otherwise put pressure on hospital
resources.
IT systems have also been used by hospitals to enhance
the efficiency of labor utilization, which is among the
biggest expense items in any health system. Digital
workforce management systems enable administrators
to create staffing schedules that are optimal and which
are created through real-time patient volumes, acuity
levels, and departmental workload. This will help to
make sure that the appropriate number of employees is
provided at any point in time, which will limit overtime
expenses and the threats of understaffing. Also, task
management software embedded in EHRs can help to
limit the duplication of effort, idle time, and ensure that
clinicians are working on the main care delivery-related
tasks,
not
unnecessary
documentation,
or
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
101
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
administrative activities.
Although the initial expenditure of digital transitioning
is high, break-even periods of three to five years are
common in many hospitals, especially where IT
investment is integrated with wider cost control
measures. Those institutions which follow a strategy of
staged rollout, starting with high-impact departments,
e.g., radiology, intensive care units, or emergency
services, can show quick financial gains and generate
internal momentum towards system-wide usage. The
incremental strategy also gives a better command on
finances and minimizes the risks of implementation
failure, which otherwise may lead to sunk costs and
lower ROI.
Another source of financial optimization is cloud-based
solutions. Hospitals can achieve huge savings in capital
expenditures on servers and physical IT infrastructure
as well as in-house data centers by migrating to cloud-
hosted EHRs and data storage facilities. Cloud models
that are priced on a subscription basis can have
predictable monthly expenses and there is no
requirement of expensive upgrades or maintenance of
the system since this is done by the service provider.
Also, cloud interoperability solutions can facilitate
easier data sharing between facilities, shared services
models which further cut administration costs.
Although generally viewed as a cost center,
cybersecurity investments are critical towards
maintaining the financial integrity of hospital systems.
The direct and indirect costs related to data breaches
can be massive, covering fines, legal suits, loss of
patients and loss of reputation. Sophisticated cyber
defense systems such as firewalls, endpoint detection,
intrusion prevention system, and employee training
procedures guard hospitals against such risks and keep
the revenue channels flowing. At this point, hospitals
including cybersecurity risk management into their ROI
models are in a better position to measure and defend
these essential spending.
The IT investment financial returns are also
accelerated by the better payer relations and
adherence to the value-based reimbursement models.
With the shift of healthcare systems away fee-for-
service toward value-based care, the capacity to
showcase quantifiable results has become paramount in
ensuring the reimbursement increase. With EHRs and
analytics tools, hospitals can report performance
measures including quality scores, readmission rates
and preventive care measures accurately. This would
not only create compliance but would open up financial
incentives associated with government and private
insurer programs.
Conclusively, it is important to note that IT investments
in the hospital environment are not expenses, but
strategic instruments of financial sustainability and cost-
efficiency. Digital systems provide a solid and non-
financial financial payback through automation of
administrative processes, decision quality and
frequency improvement, better procurement and
staffing, and facilitation of regulatory compliance, all of
which considerably surpass their sticker prices.
Nevertheless, these benefits require strategic planning,
leadership commitment, and evaluation in order to be
realized. When the digital transformation is viewed and
utilized as a fundamental financial strategy, as opposed
to a marginal technology update, then the institutions
have a better chance at realizing a healthy ROI and a
stable budget in the long term.
5.
Clinical Performance And Patient Outcome
Improvements
Outside the financial concerns, the most transformative
nature of digital health investments is that it has the
potential to greatly impact the clinical performance, and
patient outcomes. Information technology systems are
essential in the hospital setting where precision,
swiftness, and coordination are important factors that
decrease errors, promote evidence-based practice
decisions, and provide timely interventions. Whether it
is real-time diagnostic assistance or interdepartmental
communication, digital tools clinical utility spans the
boundaries of the continuity of care. The section
discusses the role of such systems in showing
quantifiable gains regarding patient safety, care quality,
and clinical efficiency, which in the end supports the
investment payoff in terms of medical outcome.
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
102
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
Figure 03: Clinical performance comparison before and after digital health implementation.
Figure Description
: This chart compares pre- and post-
implementation metrics for key clinical outcomes
—
medication errors, adverse drug events, ICU mortality,
30-day readmissions, and imaging accuracy. The
consistent improvements (ranging from 16% to 42%)
highlight the efficacy of digital tools like CDSS, CPOE,
and AI-assisted diagnostics.
The decreased level of medical errors by a significant
margin is one of the main clinical advantages of the
digital transformation of hospitals. Such technologies
as Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) and
Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) aim to
help healthcare professionals by giving timely alerts,
dosage suggestions, and interaction warnings that
decrease the possibility of adverse drug events (ADEs).
These tools assist in making sure that diagnosis and
treatment decisions are made following best practices
by integrating evidence-based guidelines into the
clinical workflow. This has been particularly useful in
high-risk settings like in intensive care units (ICUs) and
emergency departments where any small compromise
is capable of producing grave repercussions. The
standardized data collected by Electronic Health
Records (EHRs) can be used to study errors
retrospectively in order to develop a learning
healthcare environment in which safety procedures
are continuously improved.
Besides, digital systems improve the accuracy of
diagnosis and treatment planning. When radiology
information systems are integrated with AI-based
image analysis, interpretations can be made quicker
and more accurately, especially where time is of the
essence, such as with stroke, trauma, or oncology
patients. Decision-support algorithms may highlight
abnormalities, propose differentiable diagnoses, or
prioritize cases at high risks, making sure that clinicians
may react promptly and adequately. In particular, these
capabilities are relevant in cases of overburdened or
understaffed hospitals, where manual reviews may
cause a delay in treatment and jeopardize patient
safety. Predictive analytics platforms also have a role to
play here as they can help identify patients that are at
risk of deterioration, and early interventions can be
made to stop further escalation and admission to the
ICU.
Digital tools in chronic disease management have
enabled clinicians to have access to rich longitudinal
data to help them offer patient-centric treatments.
Dashboards showing trends in vital signs, lab results,
and medication adherence can assist physicians to make
informed decisions in real time. With telehealth
platforms, regular monitoring and virtual check-ins are
possible, thereby limiting the number of necessary
hospital trips and enhancing continuity of care. It is
especially useful with conditions like diabetes,
hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
(COPD), and heart failure, in which adjustment of the
therapy on short notice can help avoid complications
and readmission to the hospital.
Another aspect with massive ROI is the effect of digital
systems on clinical coordination and communication. A
hospital is a naturally multidisciplinary environment in
which nurses, physicians, pharmacists, and specialists
have to collaborate. EHR systems and secure messaging
systems facilitate communication through real-time
updates, shared access to the patient records, and
collaborative documentation. This minimizes care
delivery delays, eliminates unnecessary testing, and
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
103
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
makes sure that treatment plans are sensible between
departments. Clinical handoffs more formal, and a shift
change happens with complete awareness of the
patient status, which decreases the likelihood of
miscommunication and omissions.
Automated monitoring and alerting also help in
ensuring patient safety protocols. The bedside
monitors that are connected to central dashboards can
monitor vital signs and send alerts when something is
abnormal, like a sudden decrease in blood pressure or
an irregular heartbeat. Such alerts coupled with
escalation practices enable care teams to act with
speed in response to possible emergencies. Moreover,
infection control systems with digital tracking of
hygiene conformity, isolation, and patient localization
contribute to mitigating hospital-acquired infections
(HAIs), improving general safety and decreasing the
implications of a prolonged stay.
Digital transformation in surgical departments has
given rise to the creation of integrated perioperative
systems to direct preoperative evaluations, scheduling
of the operating room, and intraoperative records. By
virtue of the fact that all the relevant preparations are
made beforehand and the surgeons have unfettered
access to the patient histories as well as diagnostic
information these systems serve to reduce delays,
minimize cancellations and help to improve surgical
outcomes. Patient portals make postoperative follow-
up accessible, which allows prompt detection of
possible complications and ensures compliance with
recovery plans.
Patient engagement is another aspect that significantly
influences
improved
outcomes,
and
digital
technologies have increased the number of channels
through which hospitals can communicate with their
patients and empower them. Patients can use online
portals and mobile health apps to check test results,
messages with providers, make appointments, and get
educational information. This will not only foster
openness and credibility, but will also enhance
compliance to treatment courses. More-informed and
engaged patients have reportedly better health
outcomes and are linked with greater satisfaction,
which is becoming a basis of hospital reimbursement
in value-based care models.
Digital transformation pursues clinical performance
enhancements that can be observed in hospital quality
metrics as well. Hospitals which have put in place
strong IT systems generally note a decrease in the
number of 30-day readmissions, a decrease in the
average length of stay, enhanced discharge planning,
and increased adherence to clinical guidelines. Not
only do these metrics reflect an improved likelihood of
patient outcomes, but they also determine
accreditation, public ratings, and access to
performance-based financial incentives offered by
payers. By being able to showcase a constant
betterment of quality using data-driven results, such
hospitals have a stronger chance to secure funding,
human resources, and the confidence of the
community.
But availability of technology is not the only determining
factor to realize these clinical benefits. A successful
implementation depends on proper training, workflow
integration, and clinician buy-in. The effectiveness of IT
systems can be hindered by resistance to change,
usability problems and data entry weariness. Hence,
hospitals should invest in user-centered design, change
management programs, and the ongoing feedback loop
to maximize the functionality of the system and
guarantee a long-term clinical effect.
To sum up, the clinical aspect of ROI of IT investments in
hospitals is deep and complex. Whether it is the
accuracy of the diagnosis and the opportunity to
minimize medical errors, communication, patient
engagement, and chronic disease management, digital
systems can help achieve better health outcomes. Such
gains do not only make the technology investment
worthwhile but also support the bigger picture of
healthcare facilities, which is to deliver safe, effective,
and patient-centered care. Clinical performance metrics
will become key measures of success as hospitals
proceed to develop in the digital age and determine
additional
innovation
and
investment
in
transformational technologies.
6.
Discussions
This study has produced findings that shed light on the
extent of the affected aspects of hospital systems by
digital transformation, especially with regard to
financial
efficiency,
clinical
performance,
and
operational productivity. With hospitals all over the
world facing the pressure of rising costs and a rise in the
number of patients and demands of quality care,
information technology has come out as a pillar of
modernization in healthcare. Nevertheless, even
though the coordination of digital systems, including
Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Clinical Decision
Support Systems (CDSS), predictive analytics tools, and
others has become a standard task, the issue of how
these investments can beconverted into actual and
quantifiable returns, still prevails in the list of strategic
concerns discussed at the executive level. The present
study is relevant to that discussion, in that it presents an
in-depth,
data-driven
assessment
of
the
multidimensional return on investment (ROI) related to
spending on IT in hospitals.
Among the most striking results touches upon financial
benefits realized in the process of digitization. Hospitals
using integrated billing, procurement, and workforce
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
104
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
management systems were able to showcase
tremendous savings on administrative expenses,
billing mistakes, and inefficiencies in the supply chain.
These results confirm the hypothesis that IT systems
when used strategically are not just ordinary
operational tools but major facilitators of financial
discipline. Though initial cost of implementation is still
expensive,
particularly
in
resource-constrained
institutions, the evidence in this study indicates that
the break-even points can be achieved within a
medium term horizon especially when implementation
is done in concert with wider cost-reduction plans and
leadership commitment. In addition, cloud-based
solutions have seen new efficiencies in the form of
reduced capital costs in hardware infrastructure and
minimized maintenance responsibilities in the form of
vendor-managed services.
The clinical aspect of ROI provided interesting
revelations as well. CDSS, CPOE, and remote
monitoring technologies are some of the tools that
have shown significant involvement in assisting patient
safety, accurate diagnosis, and continuity of care. It is
part of the larger trend towards a value-based model
of care delivery, in which outcomes, as opposed to the
volumes of services provided, are the main drivers of
reimbursement and institutional prestige. Hospitals
that are using digital systems to help avoid medication
errors, lower readmission rates, and decrease the
length of stay of patients are not only enjoying better
patient outcomes but also better financial gains in
terms of fewer penalty charges and better relations
with payers. The following benefits are not always as
apparent in the conventional ROI analysis, but they are
part of long-term sustainability of digital health
infrastructure.
Notably, the research observed that ROI in healthcare
information technology is not consistent notably
across institutions and departments. A number of
contextual factors also played a great role. Hospitals
that had a clear digital strategy, high level of executive
participation, and a culture of constant learning had an
ROI that was consistently higher in all three areas.
Conversely, those institutions that approached
technologies in a reactive manner (not coordinating
them to clinical or financial objectives) were unable to
derive substantial value out of their investment. That
is why strategic alignment and change management
and the involvement of staff are valuable in attaining
the best outcomes. In plain words, it is not the
technology that pushes the ROI, but the very idea of
meaningful
combination
of
technology
and
organizational environment brings success.
Value proposition The value proposition of digital
transformation is strengthened by operational
efficiency gains as well. Hospitals, which implemented
real-time dashboards, digital scheduling, and task
management tools, stated that their staff productivity,
patient throughput, and resource utilization rates
improved
significantly.
These
operational
improvements are not only cost saving but also enhance
the overall care experience by decreasing wait times,
eliminating duplicative processes and streamlining
clinical workflow. Such gains are even more important
in departments like emergency medicine and radiology
where any delay can be life-threatening. Nevertheless,
to materialize the above advantages, it is required not
only to get access to high-quality tools but also to invest
in staff education, process redesign, and ongoing
performance measurement.
Another finding that was corroborated in this paper is
that the conventional financial models utilized to assess
ROI cannot comprehensively estimate the gains of
digital health investments. Although approaches like
Net Present Value (NPV) or Payback Period are still
valuable in the short-term financial planning context,
they tend to overlook or underestimate intangible or
long-term returns like an increase in patient
satisfaction,
employee
morale,
or
reputation
management. A more subtle and balanced evaluation
can be achieved by the hybrid evaluation models which
combines financial and non-financial measures.
Example: cost-benefit analyses combined with outcome
measures and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) can
enable institutions to gain insight into the value (societal
and clinical) that their technology infrastructure
creates.
Regarding the identified positive outcomes, there are
still a couple of limitations and challenges. The most
important of them is the problem of interoperability. A
considerable number of hospitals still work in the
fragmented digital ecosystem, where the Department
of Radiology can hardly share data with other
departments or external partners. Not only does this
inhibit the possibility of integrated care, it also inhibits
real-time decision-making and end-to-end performance
assessment. The results of the study add strength to the
arguments about the necessity of policy-level
interventions and vendor collaboration to standardize
data formats, encourage system compatibility, and
bring about the IT infrastructure that will facilitate the
communication throughout the full care continuum.
The other lingering problem is clinician adoption.
Regarding the hospitals with well-developed digital
infrastructure, the study discovered that the
opportunities offered by the digital environment
significantly differed depending on the engagement of
the users. The effective use of health IT is still
undermined by usability problems, resistance to
change, and an incorrectly perceived increase in
administrative burden. This hints at the idea that the
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
105
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
investments
in
user-centered
design,
clinical
informatics training, and the mechanisms of the
continuous feedback are not the nice-to-have add-ons
to the digital transformation strategies but their core
elements. Moreover, frontline staff should be involved
in the process of selecting, customizing, and evaluating
IT tools as this will raise the chances of successful
implementation and permanent inclusion in clinical
practice.
Figure 04: Correlation between digital maturity levels and ROI outcomes in hospitals.
Figure Description
: The diagram maps digital maturity
stages (3 to 7) against ROI percentages, showing a
direct correlation from 12% to 42%. It underscores that
hospitals with more advanced digital ecosystems
achieve significantly higher returns on investment,
reinforcing the role of strategic IT integration.
Besides these findings, the study also illuminates on
the significance of sustainability planning. Although
the ROI in the initial stages might be impressive, the
total cost of owning digital systems has to factor in
continued
investment
in
system
upgrades,
cybersecurity, and user support. The inability of
hospitals to factor in these recurring costs puts at risk
their
initial
gains
and
becoming
obsolete
technologically. Hence, IT investments should be
supplemented with lifecycle management strategies
encompassing regular reviews, capacity development
initiatives, and flexibility to new technologies including
artificial intelligence and blockchain.
These findings have serious implications to healthcare
administrators, policy makers and technology vendors.
To hospital leaders, the study provides evidence based
grounds on justifying IT investments, which are usually
questioned given that they are highly priced and
viewed as complex. It offers a structure to assess not
just the financial payback, but in addition the clinical
and operational results of digital programs. Among the
policy makers, the study stresses on the importance of
supportive regulations, funding mechanisms and
national interoperability standards to guide the
equitable digital adoption. To technology vendors, it
reinstates the need to ensure that the designs of
flexible, interoperable, and user-friendly solutions that
address the practical demands of healthcare institutions
are met.
To summarize the findings, it is possible to note that
digital transformation in hospitals can be positioned as
a strong ROI case; however, the assessment should be
multidimensional.
A
combination
of
financial
efficiencies, better clinical outcomes and operational
improvements all serve to prove the strategic value of
IT investments in health systems. The success however
depends on the alignment to institutional goals, strong
implementation plans and maintenance support. The
further evolution of the healthcare sector will require a
uniform and evidence-based method of ROI assessment
to be used as a basis to make future investments and to
make sure that digital transformation brings a
significant change in patient outcomes and system
efficiencies.
7.
Results
The results of this research furnish statistically sound,
empirical documentation, on the monetary, clinical, and
operational returns produced by IT investments in the
hospital setting. Based on a varied sample of public and
privately owned hospitals that have experienced an
extensive digital remodel, the consideration of
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
106
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
quantitative indicators prevailing in the period prior to
the introduction of technology and after was used. The
goal was to determine quantitative baselines in
performance rates directly related to the digital tools
namely Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Clinical
Decision Support Systems (CDSS), telemedicine
systems, predictive analytics systems, and integrated
Health Information Exchanges (HIEs). These outcomes
are reported in three categories including financial
efficiency, clinical outcomes, and operational
productivity.
Hospitals also recorded considerable declines in
administrative overhead in terms of financial
performance after implementing digitized billing
systems and automated claims management.
Administrative cost ratios also decreased at an average
of 9.7 percent within two years of deploying the
systems. Plants which have gone live with integrated
procurement and inventory systems have also shown
significant increase in expenditure visibility and supply
chain performance. Namely, 78 percent of hospitals
demonstrated a decrease in procurement redundancy
by at least 12 percent, and 66 percent better
optimization of vendor contracts through the use of
analytics-driven purchasing platform. In addition,
hospitals using cloud-based EHR systems reported a
decreased IT maintenance and infrastructure spending
by 21 percent in three years mainly because of the on-
site server cost saving and lesser software licensing
spending.
Improvement was also observed in revenue cycle
metrics. The mean claim processing time decreased by
17 days (pre-implementation) to 10 days (after
implementation) resulting in 32 percent increase in
cash flow in facilities that had complete digitization of
their revenue management system. Concurrently, the
deny rate due to documentation errors reduced by
26%, indicating an enhancement of coding accuracy
and
enhanced
integration
between
clinical
documentation and billing systems. These economic
benefits led to the budgeting with more certainty and
greater capacity of strategic planning.
In the clinical performance category, the data
indicated that the hospitals that used CDSS and CPOE
tools experienced significant changes in the safety and
care outcomes of the patients. The facilities
implementing such tools saw a drop in the number of
medication-related errors by 38% and adverse drug
events by 42% during a 12-month follow-up. Intensive
care units (ICUs) that adopted predictive analytics
systems saw a measurable 16 percent reduction in ICU
mortality rates, representing a real improvement in
critical care outcomes. The implementation of
telemedicine in the management of chronic illnesses
revealed that there was an 18 percent decrease in the
rate of 30-day readmissions, especially in the
management of heart failure patients, diabetes, and
COPD. Additionally, radiology departments AI-assisted
diagnostic tools adoption in radiology settings improved
detection accuracy of imaging anomalies by 27%,
leading to more timely and focused interventions,
according to hospitals that have already implemented
them.
Clinical workflows were also considerably impacted by
the effects of digital transformation. Patient
satisfaction: The time it takes to treat a patient after
admission to the emergency department was reduced
by 24 percent in departments with real-time clinical
dashboards and decision support. EHRs with
standardized digital templates allowed physicians to fill
out discharge summaries 31 percent faster, which
helped improve patient throughput and alleviate
bottlenecks. Integrated perioperative systems in
surgical departments caused a 19-percentage point
decrease in the cancellation rate and a 3.7-to 2.5-day
decrease in the average wait time in the preoperative
period.
Moving to operational effectiveness, hospitals that had
digitalized their workforce management systems
showed improved productivity of the staff and more
effective human resources allocation. The time spent by
nurses on documentation was decreased, on average,
by 37 percent so that clinical staff could devote more
time to direct patient care. The facilities that automated
the scheduling and bed management processes
achieved 23 percent increase in the bed turnover rates
and 29 percent reduction in the wait time experienced
by patients to be admitted. Automation of tasks in
support
services
(patient
transport,
dietary
management, and housekeeping) also resulted in 15
percent reduction in delays of service delivery and 12
percent rise in satisfaction with service delivery as
internal survey reports.
The level of operational errors, including duplication of
testing, misplaced documentation, and clashes in
schedules, were also significantly reduced in digitally
mature institutions. Duplicative diagnostic tests also
reduced by 34% which was credited to the central
access to data that HIEs provide. The integration
between departments in facilities with strong
interoperability was enhanced greatly, leading to 25
percent more timely clinical handoffs and 17 percent
reduction in delays of treatment caused by absence of
patient information.
Lastly, the patient engagement and satisfaction
indicators were also significantly improved in the
hospitals that had implemented the digital portals and
mobile health apps. In facilities that utilized automated
SMS and email reminders along with scheduling
software, the mean rate of missed appointments
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
107
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
reduced by 22 percent. Meanwhile, the adherence to
preventive care grew by 19 percent among the
patients who had access to personalized health
tracking tools delivered via hospital apps. The
compliance with post-discharge follow-up was also
increased by 15 percent in the facilities where
telemedicine included the possibility of remote
consultation.
Figure 05: Operational efficiency gains after digital transformation implementation.
Figure Description
: This chart illustrates the impact of
IT on operational performance by comparing nurse
documentation time, bed turnover rates, diagnostic
duplication, and staff satisfaction before and after
digitization. The visual emphasizes how automation
and digitized workflows improve hospital productivity
and service delivery.
Together, these quantitative findings prove that ROI of
digital transformation of hospitals is not limited to a
single domain but extends into the domains of
financial stability, clinical excellence, and operational
robustness. The positive relation between the degree
of digital maturity and the increase in performance
was reflected within the data. Hospitals with fully
integrated digital ecosystems were especially
performing better than those with siloed or half-baked
implementations. In addition, the outcomes of the
institutions where there was a strategic fit between IT
initiatives and institutional objectives demonstrated
more consistency and larger magnitude of
improvements, which once again an emphasis on the
leadership involvement and formal implementation.
Although the data substantiates the possibility of
quantifiable returns on digital transformation, it
reveals a wide disparity in outcomes depending on the
approach to implementation, the preparedness of the
company, and the extent to which systems are able to
interoperate. The findings form a strong basis of the
further development of best-practice models that can
assist hospitals not only in the process of choosing an
IT solution but also in building the environment in
which the solution can create long-term, multi-
dimensional value.
8.
Limitations And Future Research Directions
Although the results of this project give us a rather
complete and well-measured insight into the nature of
the return on investment (ROI) that digital
transformation of hospitals generates, there are a few
limitations that need to be mentioned. In no way
diminishing the overall merits of the research, these
limitations give crucial context to the results
interpretation and indicate the directions in which
future researches can potentially broaden and deepen
the area of investigation. It is also crucial that hospital
leaders
and
policymakers
acknowledge
these
limitations so that they may make balanced decisions
whenever translating the study findings to fit their
institutional settings.
The cross-sectional research design is one of the major
declarations of this investigation. Although the data
with the various hospitals provide a useful before and
after IT implementation performance snapshot, they fail
to provide long term trends and long delayed
performance results that may become apparent years
after the deployment. As an example, the digital
transformation advantages associated with preventive
care
improvement,
organizational
learning
enhancement, or alleviation of the burden of chronic
diseases are some of the aspects that can only be
realized through a long-term view. A longitudinal design
would be more able to explain the accruing impacts of
digital investments and offer more insight into how ROI
might sustain in the long-term.
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
108
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
The second limitation is the inconsistency of digital
maturity and implementation plans across institutions.
Try as it might to control these differences by
incorporating hospitals of different sizes and
specialties, differences in the manner in which the
technologies were adopted, tailored, and incorporated
into clinical workflows could not but impact the
results. There were institutions that had developed
interoperability among departments and there were
others that had a fragmented system that limited them
to gain maximum benefit of the IT infrastructure they
had. Such inconsistencies potentially added some bias
to the comparative performance improvement
measurements and must be resolved in future studies
with a finer grain stratification of implementation
models and maturity indices.
There are also some threats to the accuracy of the data
because of the use of the self-reported institutional
data. Although attempts were safeguarded to ensure
that the integrity of financial and operational records
was triangulated with system-generated reports and
performance
dashboards,
reports
bias
or
incompleteness cannot be entirely eliminated.
Hospitals in certain instances are also suspected of
overstating savings or understating difficulties in order
to paint a rosier picture of their IT projects. This issue
could be addressed in prospective studies by a greater
dependence on
externally
audited
data or
independent reviews.
In addition, the research concentrated on both
quantitative measures of ROI, particularly cost savings,
cutting down on errors, or increasing efficiency.
Although these indicators can make a compelling case
of value creation, they will possibly underestimate the
qualitative effects of the digital transformation,
including better employee morale, greater patient
confidence, or increased institutional prestige. Those
are intangible benefits that are more difficult to
measure, but they are also instrumental in juicing IT
investments, particularly in mission-driven healthcare
organizations. Future research ought to contemplate
the usage of mixed-methods designs, comprising
interviews or focus groups or ethnographic
observations, to examine these softer aspects of ROI.
Yet another weakness is the narrow geographical
coverage of the study. The hospital sample was varied
but mostly covered the institutions in the areas with
comparatively
stable
infrastructure,
digital
preparedness, and vendor support possibilities. This
could reduce the external validity of the results to
lower-income states or underfunded healthcare
systems where issues like unstable internet
connection, poor digital literacy of the employees, and
restricted budget dramatically limit the use of digital
tools. A study of the impact of these contextual factors
on ROI of IT investments in more resource-limited
settings would both be a contribution to the literature
and a necessity to global health equity.
Policy and regulation are another important aspect that
needs more investigation because it is dynamic in
nature and affects the outcome of the digital
transformation. Even though this study appreciates the
role of government programs like funding incentives or
interoperability requirements, it does not methodically
evaluate the impact of policy variations amongst
jurisdictions on implementation achievement or ROI
attainment. A comparative policy analysis, particularly
between national health systems or various regulatory
frameworks, may help understand the role of public
governance in the digital health environment and reveal
the areas of the most necessary regulatory changes.
Regarding the future research directions, a number of
prospects arise on the basis of the limitations discussed.
One, it should focus on using longitudinal studies to
evaluate the changing ROI of digital investment
between five to ten years. Such studies would be able to
follow not just measures of cost and efficiency, but
shifts in the health indicators of the patient population,
workload configurations in the clinicians, and rates of
technological obsolescence. That kind of long-range
analysis would give a more detailed picture of
sustainability and would establish more clear guidelines
as to when and how to invest again in upgrades or new
platforms.
Second, the comparative effectiveness of the various IT
systems in similar hospital environments could be
studied in the future. That is to say, a comparison of two
hospitals with similar size and demographics
implementing different EHR vendors or analytics tools
might provide insight into which technologies deliver
the most reliable and scalable value. Such comparative
modelling, paired with cost-effectiveness analysis,
would particularly benefit mid-sized or rural hospitals
that have to make vendor choices with a very limited
budget.
Third, the relationship between the workforce and
digital systems needs to be examined in the future. The
enhanced insight into the way that staff training, digital
literacy, and organizational culture impact the use and
the effect of IT might be used to base more successful
change management strategies. This also involves the
measurement of the ROI of investments in the
workforce development programme to aid in the
implementation of technology, which is usually missing
in the existing ROI models.
Finally, the need to examine the digital technologies of
the new generation, which include artificial intelligence,
blockchain, and digital twins, and their ROI potential in
a hospital setting, emerges. The technologies are still in
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
109
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
their early adoption stages but hold the promise of
bringing about new efficiencies, security and predictive
possibilities. Responsible innovation should be
informed by piloting their cost-benefit profiles in
future research.
To conclude, this study has an excellent empirical basis
and gives ideas on the ROI of hospital digital
transformation; however, its limitations support the
statement that further and widened research is
necessary. Future research could tighten still further
our grasp of the role of digital health technologies in
the future of hospital performance, sustainability, and
patient-centered care by filling the gaps in time,
context, and methods indicated here.
9.
Conclusion And Recommendations
The fast development pace of digital technologies
altered the operational and clinical structure of
present-day hospitals and provided them with
unprecedented chances to enhance efficiency, safety,
and the overall quality of care. The current paper
aimed to estimate the ROI of IT implementations in
hospitals based on an extensive, evidence-based
examination. The results support the fact that
successfully done digital transformation creates
significant value in three main areas, including financial
stability,
clinical
excellence,
and
operational
productivity. Although the channels through which ROI
can be achieved are usually convoluted and depend on
a particular situation, the data is strongly pointing
toward the conclusion that digital investments, when
approached with a strategic goal in mind and backed
by effective leadership, can turn hospitals into more
responsive,
data-savvy,
and
patient-oriented
institutions.
On the financial front, the adoption of E-Systems like
EHRs, revenue cycle automation, and procurement
analytics platform led to the realization of huge savings
in terms of administrative costs, inefficiencies in billing,
and procurement redundancies. Hospitals which have
adopted cloud-based infrastructure cited reduced
capital expenditure and operations savings due to
scale IT models. The accuracy of documentation and
simplification of claims processing allowed receiving
reimbursements
quicker
and
with
greater
predictability of financial flows. In addition, the
replacement of paperwork with computerized systems
promoted transparency and accountability in
budgetary implementation, that is, essential in long-
term financial planning in healthcare institutions.
These gains highlight the potential of digital health
systems to not only recoup their costs over the long
run, but also produce a long-term financial gain that
increases institutional sustainability.
Regarding clinical aspects, it was identified that digital
technologies, CDSS, CPOE, and AI-based diagnostic
systems can enhance the accuracy, timeliness, and
appropriateness of medical interventions. These
technologies minimized medication errors, made it
possible to identify high-risk conditions at an early
stage, and enhanced the overall management of chronic
diseases, which is associated with better outcomes in
patient care and increased safety standards.
Incorporation of real-time clinical dashboards enabled
quick response to worsening conditions by the
healthcare professionals especially in high-acuity units
such as ICUs and emergency departments. More than
that, remote monitoring and telemedicine ensured
continuity of care in patients with chronic conditions,
reducing readmission rates and improving treatment
plan adherence. These gains are especially appropriate
in the circumstances of value-based care where
institutions are compensated based on health results
instead of the quantity of services provided. In this way,
clinical ROI of digital transformation extends beyond
cost control; it is the ideal of contemporary medicine,
namely, safe, effective, and equitable care.
At the operational level, the hospitals have
demonstrated a tangible benefit in the coordination of
workflow, the assignment of resources, and the
productivity of the staff. Workforce management
systems (digital) improved scheduling and bed
management
systems
decreased
patient
flow
bottlenecks. Automation of tasks in the administrative
and support functions resulted in time savings, and
reduced the copying of effort. Hospitals that had
received interoperable systems had an easier flow of
care transitions, quicker decision-making, and shorter
delays in diagnostics and treatment. These functional
returns were in the form of enhanced patient
satisfaction and better institutional performance on
regulatory standards and quality measures. Notably,
these benefits were department-agnostic, which
supports the perception according to which digital
transformation must be viewed as a hospital-level
strategic initiative, as opposed to a set of department-
level technology rollouts.
Although the benefits of digital transformation are
varied and considerable as described above, the digital
transformation journey is not all smooth sailing. Those
hospitals that had poor governing structure or low levels
of staff involvement or a disjointed digital system
experienced less steady increases in ROI. The results
point to the outstanding significance of strategic
alignment, leadership dedication, and personnel
preparedness. Technology can never bring change by
itself, but it is actually the organizational surroundings,
the people, the procedures, and the policies that decide
whether the digital instruments bring forth their
maximum outcome. Those institutions which had
integrated digital systems in their overall strategy,
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
110
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
engaged clinicians in the design and implementation of
the tools as well as invested in capacity building had
much higher chances of realizing high ROI.
The findings of the present study have a number of
practical
implications
to
hospital
managers,
technology sellers, and health policymakers. Firstly,
hospital management needs to approach IT
investments as fundamental strategic assets as
opposed to secondary equipment. This necessitates
the creation of long-term digital strategies that put
into
focus
scalability,
interoperability,
and
compatibility with institutional goals. The decision on
investments must be based on overall ROI analysis
including both financial and non-financial measures. To
make this possible, hospitals ought to implement
hybrid evaluation models that interrelate cost-benefits
analysis with measures of clinical quality, patient
safety, and operational efficiency.
Second, it is essential in terms of capacity building.
Institutions should also invest in proper training and
support systems that would give staff the power to
work with digital systems. Particularly, clinicians
should participate in the customization of systems and
integration of workflows so that usability and
relevance are achieved. Continuous, dynamic, and
adjustive training ought to occur in response to
technology and care delivery model changes. The
second thing that is of high importance is the necessity
to promote a culture of digital literacy and innovation
where staff members will be encouraged and
supported in using technology to enhance care.
Third, hospital-technology vendor relationships need
to shift transactional relationships to strategic
alliances. The vendors must be responsible not just in
the delivery of the system but in the results after
implementation. The hospitals on their part should
have the feedback loops that feed on system upgrades,
user interface enhancements, and support structures.
This kind of cooperation will guarantee that the
systems will be easy to use, clinically meaningful, and
adjustable to changing demands.
Fourth, health policymakers need to identify that
digital transformation of hospitals is a form of public
good, which should be supported by policy. These are
regulatory
support
structures
to
encourage
interoperability, economic incentives to encourage
technology use, and investments in the national digital
health infrastructure. There should also be policy
regarding the equity issues, as small or poorly
equipped hospitals should be provided with the tools
and funding that would allow them to become
digitalized successfully. Moreover, standardized ROI
frameworks need to be incorporated in national health
strategies in order to orient and benchmark
performance of institutions to enable learning and
accountability within the sector.
Fifth, hospitals ought to strategically think long-term
about sustainability in digital systems. This means
providing a forecast of the future upgrade expenses,
investing in cyber protection, and building more
versatile architectures capable of integrating the
emerging technologies, including AI, blockchain, and
IoT.
Sustainability
also
entails
that
digital
transformation shall not lead to user fatigue, data silos,
or an increase in inequalities in care access. The
hospitals need to balance technological ambition with
operational realism and scale innovations according to
evidence and institutional capability.
Finally, academic and research societies must take the
obligation to develop the evidence-base of digital
transformation in healthcare. Additional longitudinal,
comparative, and mixed-methods studies are required
to appreciate the entire range of ROI and to elaborate
best practices according to various contexts of health
systems. Researchers can have an outsized role in
helping digital health achieve a more effective and
equitable future by promoting a greater understanding
of what, whom, and under which circumstances various
technologies work.
To sum up, the idea of digital transformation of a
hospital is not a hypothetical trend, it is a strategic
necessity. When well-planned and backed by data-
driven planning, even IT investments can bring about
noteworthy returns that go well beyond the balance
sheet. They are able to improve quality of care,
institutional resiliency, and create more efficient,
equitable, and patient-centered health systems. With
hospitals still facing their way through the maze of these
complicated challenges, the results of this study provide
a guide on how they can use technology to not only
survive, but to prosper in the digital age.
10.
References
1.
Adler-Milstein J, Holmgren AJ, Kralovec P, et al.
Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals:
the emergence of a digital "advanced use" divide. J
Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(6):1142-1148.
2.
Furukawa MF, King J, Patel V, et al. Despite
substantial progress in EHR adoption, health
information exchange and patient engagement
remain low in office settings. Health Aff.
2014;33(9):1672-1679.
3.
Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic
medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff.
2004;23(2):116-126.
4.
Hillestad R, Bigelow J, Bower A, et al. Can electronic
medical record systems transform health care?
Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health
Aff. 2005;24(5):1103-1117.
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
111
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
5.
Jha AK, DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, et al. Use of
electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J
Med. 2009;360(16):1628-1638.
6.
Bates DW, Leape LL, Cullen DJ, et al. Effect of
computerized physician order entry and a team
intervention on prevention of serious medication
errors. JAMA. 1998;280(15):1311-1316.
7.
Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, et al. Systematic
review: impact of health information technology
on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care.
Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742-752.
8.
Bashshur RL, Shannon GW, Smith BR, et al. The
empirical
evidence
for
the
telemedicine
intervention in diabetes management. Telemed J E
Health. 2015;21(5):321-354.
9.
Kruse CS, Kristof C, Jones B, et al. Barriers to
electronic health record adoption: a systematic
literature review. J Med Syst. 2016;40(12):252.
10.
Vest JR, Gamm LD. Health information exchange:
persistent challenges and new strategies. J Am
Med Inform Assoc. 2010;17(3):288-294.
11.
Amarasingham R, Patel PC, Toto K, et al. Allocating
scarce resources in real-time to reduce heart
failure readmissions: a prospective, controlled
study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013;22(12):998-1005.
12.
Williams C, Mostashari F, Mertz K, et al. From the
Office of the National Coordinator: the strategy for
advancing the exchange of health information.
Health Aff. 2012;31(3):527-536.
13.
Holmgren AJ, Patel V, Adler-Milstein J. Progress in
interoperability:
measuring
US
hospitals'
engagement in sharing patient data. Health Aff.
2017;36(10):1820-1827.
14.
Graetz I, Gordon N, Fung V, et al. The digital divide
and patient portals: internet access explained
differences in patient portal use for secure
messaging by age, race, and income. Med Care.
2016;54(8):772-779.
15.
Zhao P, Yoo I, Lavoie J, et al. Web-based medical
appointment systems: a systematic review. J Med
Internet Res. 2017;19(4):e134.
16.
Xie B, Wang M, Feldman R, et al. Health
information technology access and use among
older adults in the US: disparities by race/ethnicity
and
income.
J
Med
Internet
Res.
2019;21(6):e13045.
17.
Kaushal R, Shojania KG, Bates DW. Effects of
computerized physician order entry and clinical
decision support systems on medication safety: a
systematic
review.
Arch
Intern
Med.
2003;163(12):1409-1416.
18.
Kaplan RS, Norton DP. The balanced scorecard
—
measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev.
1992;70(1):71-79.
19.
Menachemi N, Collum TH. Benefits and drawbacks
of electronic health record systems. Risk Manag
Healthc Policy. 2011;4:47-55.
20.
DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al.
Electronic health records in ambulatory care
—
a
national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med.
2008;359(1):50-60.
21.
Glandon GL, Smaltz DH, Slovensky DJ. Information
Systems for Healthcare Management. 8th ed.
Health Administration Press; 2014.
22.
Cresswell KM, Sheikh A. Organizational issues in the
implementation and adoption of health information
technology innovations: a systematic review of the
literature. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82(5):e73-e86.
23.
Topaz M, Ronquillo C, Peltonen LM, et al. Nurse
informaticians report low satisfaction and multi-
level concerns with electronic health records:
results from an international survey. AMIA Annu
Symp Proc. 2016;2016:2016-2025.
24.
Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, et al. The value of
health
care
information
exchange
and
interoperability. Health Aff. 2005;24(Suppl1):W5-
W10.
25.
Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health
information
technology.
N
Engl
J
Med.
2009;360(15):1477-1479.
26.
Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, et al. The
benefits of health information technology: a review
of the recent literature shows predominantly
positive results. Health Aff. 2011;30(3):464-471.
27.
Buntin MB, Jain SH, Blumenthal D. Health
information technology: laying the infrastructure
for
national
health
reform.
Health
Aff.
2010;29(6):1214-1219.
28.
Jiang F, Jiang Y, Zhi H, et al. Artificial intelligence in
healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc
Neurol. 2017;2(4):230-243.
29.
Kuo TT, Kim HE, Ohno-Machado L. Blockchain
distributed ledger technologies for biomedical and
health care applications. J Am Med Inform Assoc.
2017;24(6):1211-1220.
30.
Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, et al. The impact of
eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a
systematic
overview.
PLoS
Med.
2011;8(1):e1000387.
31.
Scott RE, Mars M. Principles and framework for
eHealth strategy development. J Med Internet Res.
2013;15(7):e155.
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
112
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
32.
Price WN, Cohen IG. Privacy in the age of medical
big data. Nat Med. 2019;25(1):37-43.
33.
Adler-Milstein J, Pfeifer E. Information blocking: is
it occurring and what policy strategies can address
it? Milbank Q. 2017;95(1):117-135.
34.
Jha AK, Doolan D, Grandt D, et al. The use of health
information technology in seven nations. Int J Med
Inform. 2008;77(12):848-854.
35.
Kuperman GJ. Health-information exchange: why
are we doing it, and what are we doing? J Am Med
Inform Assoc. 2011;18(5):678-682.
36.
Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Keeler EB. Costs and
benefits of health information technology. Evid
Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006;(132):1-71.
37.
Jones SS, Rudin RS, Perry T, et al. Health
information technology: an updated systematic
review with a focus on meaningful use. Ann Intern
Med. 2014;160(1):48-54.
38.
Romano MJ, Stafford RS. Electronic health records
and clinical decision support systems: impact on
national ambulatory care quality. Arch Intern Med.
2011;171(10):897-903.
39.
Goldzweig CL, Towfigh A, Maglione M, et al. Costs
and benefits of health information technology:
new trends from the literature. Health Aff.
2009;28(2):w282-w293.
40.
Kellermann AL, Jones SS. What it will take to
achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health
information technology. Health Aff. 2013;32(1):63-
68.
41.
Koppel R, Metlay JP, Cohen A, et al. Role of
computerized physician order entry systems in
facilitating
medication
errors.
JAMA.
2005;293(10):1197-1203.
42.
Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for
studying health information technology in complex
adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care.
2010;19(Suppl 3):i68-i74.
43.
Cusack CM, Hripcsak G, Bloomrosen M, et al. The
future state of clinical data capture and
documentation: a report from AMIA's 2011 Policy
Meeting. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013;20(1):134-
140.
44.
Hersh WR, Gorman PN, Biagioli FE, et al. Beyond
information retrieval and electronic health record
use: competencies in clinical informatics for
medical education. Adv Med Educ Pract.
2014;5:205-212.
45.
Weiner JP, Kfuri T, Chan K, et al. "e-Iatrogenesis":
the most critical unintended consequence of CPOE
and other HIT. J Am Med Inform Assoc.
2007;14(3):387-388.
46.
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning as
Business Tools: A Framework for Diagnosing Value
Destruction
Potential
-
Md
Nadil
Khan,
Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain Ontor,
Nahid Khan, Ashequr Rahman - IJFMR Volume 6,
Issue
1,
January-February
2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.23680
47.
Enhancing Business Sustainability Through the
Internet of Things - MD Nadil Khan, Zahidur
Rahman,
Sufi
Sudruddin
Chowdhury,
Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain Ontor, Md
Didear Hossen, Nahid Khan, Hamdadur Rahman -
IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.24118
48.
Real-Time Environmental Monitoring Using Low-
Cost Sensors in Smart Cities with IoT - MD Nadil
Khan, Zahidur Rahman, Sufi Sudruddin Chowdhury,
Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain Ontor, Md
Didear Hossen, Nahid Khan, Hamdadur Rahman -
IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.23163
49.
IoT and Data Science Integration for Smart City
Solutions - Mohammad Abu Sufian, Shariful Haque,
Khaled Al-Samad, Omar Faruq, Mir Abrar Hossain,
Tughlok Talukder, Azher Uddin Shayed - AIJMR
Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1086
50.
Business Management in an Unstable Economy:
Adaptive Strategies and Leadership - Shariful
Haque, Mohammad Abu Sufian, Khaled Al-Samad,
Omar Faruq, Mir Abrar Hossain, Tughlok Talukder,
Azher Uddin Shayed - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1084
51.
The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications,
Investments, and Challenges for Enterprises - Md
Nadil Khan, Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain
Ontor, Nahid Khan, Ashequr Rahman - IJFMR
Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.22699
52.
Real-Time Health Monitoring with IoT - MD Nadil
Khan, Zahidur Rahman, Sufi Sudruddin Chowdhury,
Tanvirahmedshuvo, Md Risalat Hossain Ontor, Md
Didear Hossen, Nahid Khan, Hamdadur Rahman -
IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 1, January-February 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.22751
53.
Strategic Adaptation to Environmental Volatility:
Evaluating the Long-Term Outcomes of Business
Model Innovation - MD Nadil Khan, Shariful Haque,
Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-Samad, A H M Jafor,
Md. Aziz, Omar Faruq, Nahid Khan - AIJMR Volume
2,
Issue
5,
September-October
2024.
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
113
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1079
54.
Evaluating the Impact of Business Intelligence
Tools on Outcomes and Efficiency Across Business
Sectors - MD Nadil Khan, Shariful Haque, Kazi
Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-Samad, A H M Jafor, Md.
Aziz, Omar Faruq, Nahid Khan - AIJMR Volume 2,
Issue
5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1080
55.
Analyzing the Impact of Data Analytics on
Performance Metrics in SMEs - MD Nadil Khan,
Shariful Haque, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-
Samad, A H M Jafor, Md. Aziz, Omar Faruq, Nahid
Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-
October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1081
56.
The Evolution of Artificial Intelligence and its
Impact on Economic Paradigms in the USA and
Globally - MD Nadil khan, Shariful Haque, Kazi
Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-Samad, A H M Jafor, Md.
Aziz, Omar Faruq, Nahid Khan - AIJMR Volume 2,
Issue
5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1083
57.
Exploring the Impact of FinTech Innovations on the
U.S. and Global Economies - MD Nadil Khan,
Shariful Haque, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Khaled Al-
Samad, A H M Jafor, Md. Aziz, Omar Faruq, Nahid
Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-
October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1082
58.
Business Innovations in Healthcare: Emerging
Models for Sustainable Growth - MD Nadil khan,
Zakir Hossain, Sufi Sudruddin Chowdhury, Md.
Sohel Rana, Abrar Hossain, MD Habibullah Faisal,
SK Ayub Al Wahid, MD Nuruzzaman Pranto - AIJMR
Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1093
59.
Impact of IoT on Business Decision-Making: A
Predictive Analytics Approach - Zakir Hossain, Sufi
Sudruddin Chowdhury, Md. Sohel Rana, Abrar
Hossain, MD Habibullah Faisal, SK Ayub Al Wahid,
Mohammad Hasnatul Karim - AIJMR Volume 2,
Issue
5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1092
60.
Security Challenges and Business Opportunities in
the IoT Ecosystem - Sufi Sudruddin Chowdhury,
Zakir Hossain, Md. Sohel Rana, Abrar Hossain, MD
Habibullah Faisal, SK Ayub Al Wahid, Mohammad
Hasnatul Karim - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1089
61.
The Impact of Economic Policy Changes on
International Trade and Relations - Kazi Sanwarul
Azim, A H M Jafor, Mir Abrar Hossain, Azher Uddin
Shayed, Nabila Ahmed Nikita, Obyed Ullah Khan -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1098
62.
Privacy and Security Challenges in IoT Deployments
- Obyed Ullah Khan, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, A H M
Jafor, Azher Uddin Shayed, Mir Abrar Hossain,
Nabila Ahmed Nikita - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1099
63.
Digital Transformation in Non-Profit Organizations:
Strategies, Challenges, and Successes - Nabila
Ahmed Nikita, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, A H M Jafor,
Azher Uddin Shayed, Mir Abrar Hossain, Obyed
Ullah Khan - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-
October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1097
64.
AI and Machine Learning in International Diplomacy
and Conflict Resolution - Mir Abrar Hossain, Kazi
Sanwarul Azim, A H M Jafor, Azher Uddin Shayed,
Nabila Ahmed Nikita, Obyed Ullah Khan - AIJMR
Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1095
65.
The Evolution of Cloud Computing & 5G
Infrastructure and its Economical Impact in the
Global Telecommunication Industry - A H M Jafor,
Kazi Sanwarul Azim, Mir Abrar Hossain, Azher Uddin
Shayed, Nabila Ahmed Nikita, Obyed Ullah Khan -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1100
66.
Leveraging Blockchain for Transparent and Efficient
Supply Chain Management: Business Implications
and Case Studies - Ankur Sarkar, S A Mohaiminul
Islam, A J M Obaidur Rahman Khan, Tariqul Islam,
Rakesh Paul, Md Shadikul Bari - IJFMR Volume 6,
Issue
5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28492
67.
AI-driven Predictive Analytics for Enhancing
Cybersecurity in a Post-pandemic World: a Business
Strategy Approach - S A Mohaiminul Islam, Ankur
Sarkar, A J M Obaidur Rahman Khan, Tariqul Islam,
Rakesh Paul, Md Shadikul Bari - IJFMR Volume 6,
Issue
5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28493
68.
The Role of Edge Computing in Driving Real-time
Personalized Marketing: a Data-driven Business
Perspective - Rakesh Paul, S A Mohaiminul Islam,
Ankur Sarkar, A J M Obaidur Rahman Khan, Tariqul
Islam, Md Shadikul Bari - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28494
69.
Circular Economy Models in Renewable Energy:
Technological Innovations and Business Viability -
Md Shadikul Bari, S A Mohaiminul Islam, Ankur
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
114
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
Sarkar, A J M Obaidur Rahman Khan, Tariqul Islam,
Rakesh Paul - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-
October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.2849
5
70.
Artificial Intelligence in Fraud Detection and
Financial Risk Mitigation: Future Directions and
Business Applications - Tariqul Islam, S A
Mohaiminul Islam, Ankur Sarkar, A J M Obaidur
Rahman Khan, Rakesh Paul, Md Shadikul Bari -
IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.2849
6
71.
The Integration of AI and Machine Learning in
Supply Chain Optimization: Enhancing Efficiency
and Reducing Costs - Syed Kamrul Hasan, MD Ariful
Islam, Ayesha Islam Asha, Shaya afrin Priya, Nishat
Margia Islam - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.2807
5
72.
Cybersecurity in the Age of IoT: Business Strategies
for Managing Emerging Threats - Nishat Margia
Islam, Syed Kamrul Hasan, MD Ariful Islam, Ayesha
Islam Asha, Shaya Afrin Priya - IJFMR Volume 6,
Issue
5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.2807
6
73.
The Role of Big Data Analytics in Personalized
Marketing: Enhancing Consumer Engagement and
Business Outcomes - Ayesha Islam Asha, Syed
Kamrul Hasan, MD Ariful Islam, Shaya afrin Priya,
Nishat Margia Islam - IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.2807
7
74.
Sustainable Innovation in Renewable Energy:
Business Models and Technological Advances -
Shaya Afrin Priya, Syed Kamrul Hasan, Md Ariful
Islam, Ayesha Islam Asha, Nishat Margia Islam -
IJFMR Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.2807
9
75.
The Impact of Quantum Computing on Financial
Risk Management: A Business Perspective - Md
Ariful Islam, Syed Kamrul Hasan, Shaya Afrin Priya,
Ayesha Islam Asha, Nishat Margia Islam - IJFMR
Volume 6, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.2808
0
76.
AI-driven
Predictive
Analytics,
Healthcare
Outcomes, Cost Reduction, Machine Learning,
Patient Monitoring - Sarowar Hossain, Ahasan
Ahmed, Umesh Khadka, Shifa Sarkar, Nahid Khan -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/ 10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1104
77.
Blockchain in Supply Chain Management: Enhancing
Transparency, Efficiency, and Trust - Nahid Khan,
Sarowar Hossain, Umesh Khadka, Shifa Sarkar -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1105
78.
Cyber-Physical Systems and IoT: Transforming
Smart Cities for Sustainable Development - Umesh
Khadka, Sarowar Hossain, Shifa Sarkar, Nahid Khan
- AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1106
79.
Quantum Machine Learning for Advanced Data
Processing in Business Analytics: A Path Toward
Next-Generation Solutions - Shifa Sarkar, Umesh
Khadka, Sarowar Hossain, Nahid Khan - AIJMR
Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1107
80.
Optimizing Business Operations through Edge
Computing: Advancements in Real-Time Data
Processing for the Big Data Era - Nahid Khan,
Sarowar Hossain, Umesh Khadka, Shifa Sarkar -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1108
81.
Data Science Techniques for Predictive Analytics in
Financial Services - Shariful Haque, Mohammad Abu
Sufian, Khaled Al-Samad, Omar Faruq, Mir Abrar
Hossain, Tughlok Talukder, Azher Uddin Shayed -
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October 2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1085
82.
Leveraging IoT for Enhanced Supply Chain
Management in Manufacturing - Khaled AlSamad,
Mohammad Abu Sufian, Shariful Haque, Omar
Faruq, Mir Abrar Hossain, Tughlok Talukder, Azher
Uddin Shayed - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5,
September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1087
33
83.
AI-Driven Strategies for Enhancing Non-Profit
Organizational Impact - Omar Faruq, Shariful
Haque, Mohammad Abu Sufian, Khaled Al-Samad,
Mir Abrar Hossain, Tughlok Talukder, Azher Uddin
Shayed - AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-
October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i0.1088
84.
Sustainable Business Practices for Economic
Instability: A Data-Driven Approach - Azher Uddin
Shayed, Kazi Sanwarul Azim, A H M Jafor, Mir Abrar
Hossain, Nabila Ahmed Nikita, Obyed Ullah Khan -
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
115
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
AIJMR Volume 2, Issue 5, September-October
2024.
https://doi.org/10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1095
85.
Mohammad Majharul Islam, MD Nadil khan,
Kirtibhai Desai, MD Mahbub Rabbani, Saif Ahmad,
& Esrat Zahan Snigdha. (2025). AI-Powered
Business Intelligence in IT: Transforming Data into
Strategic Solutions for Enhanced Decision-Making.
The American Journal of Engineering and
Technology,
7(02),
59
–
73.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue02-
09
86.
Saif Ahmad, MD Nadil khan, Kirtibhai Desai,
Mohammad Majharul Islam, MD Mahbub Rabbani,
& Esrat Zahan Snigdha. (2025). Optimizing IT
Service Delivery with AI: Enhancing Efficiency
Through Predictive Analytics and Intelligent
Automation. The American Journal of Engineering
and
Technology,
7(02),
44
–
58.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue02-
08
87.
Esrat Zahan Snigdha, MD Nadil khan, Kirtibhai
Desai, Mohammad Majharul Islam, MD Mahbub
Rabbani, & Saif Ahmad. (2025). AI-Driven
Customer Insights in IT Services: A Framework for
Personalization and Scalable Solutions. The
American Journal of Engineering and Technology,
7(03),
35
–
49.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue03-
04
88.
MD Mahbub Rabbani, MD Nadil khan, Kirtibhai
Desai, Mohammad Majharul Islam, Saif Ahmad, &
Esrat
Zahan
Snigdha.
(2025).
Human-AI
Collaboration
in
IT
Systems
Design:
A
Comprehensive Framework for Intelligent Co-
Creation. The American Journal of Engineering and
Technology,
7(03),
50
–
68.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue03-
05
89.
Kirtibhai Desai, MD Nadil khan, Mohammad
Majharul Islam, MD Mahbub Rabbani, Saif Ahmad,
& Esrat Zahan Snigdha. (2025). Sentiment analysis
with ai for it service enhancement: leveraging user
feedback for adaptive it solutions. The American
Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(03), 69
–
87.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue03-
06
90.
Mohammad
Tonmoy
Jubaear
Mehedy,
Muhammad Saqib Jalil, MahamSaeed, Abdullah al
mamun, Esrat Zahan Snigdha, MD Nadil khan,
NahidKhan, & MD Mohaiminul Hasan. (2025). Big
Data and Machine Learning inHealthcare: A
Business
Intelligence
Approach
for
Cost
Optimization
andService
Improvement.
The
American
Journal
of
Medical
Sciences
andPharmaceutical
Research,
115
–
135.https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volume07
Issue0314.
91.
91. Maham Saeed, Muhammad Saqib Jalil,
Fares Mohammed Dahwal, Mohammad Tonmoy
Jubaear Mehedy, Esrat Zahan Snigdha, Abdullah
al mamun, & MD Nadil khan. (2025). The Impact of
AI on Healthcare Workforce Management: Business
Strategies for Talent Optimization and IT
Integration. The American Journal of Medical
Sciences and Pharmaceutical Research, 7(03),
136
–
156.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volume07Issue0
3-15
92.
Muhammad Saqib Jalil, Esrat Zahan Snigdha,
Mohammad Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Maham
Saeed, Abdullah al mamun, MD Nadil khan, & Nahid
Khan. (2025). AI-Powered Predictive Analytics in
Healthcare
Business:
Enhancing
OperationalEfficiency and Patient Outcomes. The
American Journal of Medical Sciences and
Pharmaceutical
Research,
93
–
114.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volume07Issue0
3-13
93.
Esrat Zahan Snigdha, Muhammad Saqib Jalil, Fares
Mohammed Dahwal, Maham Saeed, Mohammad
Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Abdullah al mamun, MD
Nadil khan, & Syed Kamrul Hasan. (2025).
Cybersecurity in Healthcare IT Systems: Business
Risk Management and Data Privacy Strategies. The
American Journal of Engineering and Technology,
163
–
184.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue03-
15
94.
Abdullah al mamun, Muhammad Saqib Jalil,
Mohammad Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Maham
Saeed, Esrat Zahan Snigdha, MD Nadil khan, &
Nahid Khan. (2025). Optimizing Revenue Cycle
Management in Healthcare: AI and IT Solutions for
Business Process Automation. The American Journal
of
Engineering
and
Technology,
141
–
162.
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajet/Volume07Issue03-
14
95.
Hasan, M. M., Mirza, J. B., Paul, R., Hasan, M. R.,
Hassan, A., Khan, M. N., & Islam, M. A. (2025).
Human-AI Collaboration in Software Design: A
Framework for Efficient Co Creation. AIJMR-
Advanced International Journal of Multidisciplinary
Research,
3(1).
DOI:
10.62127/aijmr.2025.v03i01.1125
96.
Mohammad Tonmoy Jubaear Mehedy, Muhammad
Saqib Jalil, Maham Saeed, Esrat Zahan Snigdha,
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
116
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajas
The American Journal of Applied Sciences
Nahid Khan, MD Mohaiminul Hasan.The American
Journal of Medical Sciences and Pharmaceutical
Research,
7(3).
115-
135.https://doi.org/10.37547/tajmspr/Volume07I
ssue03-14.
97.
Junaid Baig Mirza, MD Mohaiminul Hasan, Rajesh
Paul, Mohammad Rakibul Hasan, Ayesha Islam
Asha. AIJMR-Advanced International Journal of
Multidisciplinary Research, Volume 3, Issue 1,
January-February
2025
.DOI:
10.62127/aijmr.2025.v03i01.1123 .
98.
Mohammad Rakibul Hasan, MD Mohaiminul
Hasan, Junaid Baig Mirza, Ali Hassan, Rajesh Paul,
MD Nadil Khan, Nabila Ahmed Nikita.AIJMR-
Advanced
International
Journal
of
Multidisciplinary Research, Volume 3, Issue 1,
January-February
2025
.DOI:
10.62127/aijmr.2025.v03i01.1124.
