Volume 04 Issue 12-2024
78
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
12
P
AGES
:
78-81
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
Throughout its history, the term has been considered by scientists from different points of view. Despite a large
number of works on terminology, many problems concerning the term are still unsolved. No researcher has a
monopoly on truth, so terminological work must continue. Terminology as a special field of knowledge is attracting
more and more attention from researchers. This is explained by the international nature of modern scientific
knowledge, caused by the processes of integration and, as a result, the desire to unify terms as a way to overcome
language barriers in various spheres of socio-linguistic activity. Linguistic terminology reflects the conceptual
apparatus of various national scientific traditions, linguistic trends and schools, as well as the linguistic theories of
individual authors.Terminology as a special field of knowledge attracts all more attention from researchers. This is due
to the international the nature of modern scientific knowledge, caused by the processes integration and, as a result,
the desire for the unification of terms as a way overcoming language barriers in various areas of socio-cultural
activities.
KEYWORDS
Terms, interdisciplinary terms, polysemy, metalanguage, comparison.
INTRODUCTION
According to N.V. Podol'skaya, N.V.Vasilyev, V.P.
Danilenko,
V.M.
Gryaznovoy,
T.L.
Kandelaki
contemporary terminology in linguistics is known as an
artificial lexical layer, in which every part of this layer
has a limitation to use and necessary lexical condition
for development. Every term in terminology is as
Research Article
TRENDS IN TERM RESEARCH IN MODERN LINGUISTICS
Submission Date:
December 04, 2024,
Accepted Date:
December 09, 2024,
Published Date:
December 14, 2024
Crossref doi
https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue12-14
Mirmukhsin Yuldashev Munavvarjon ugli
PhD researcher of KSPI, Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajps
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 04 Issue 12-2024
79
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
12
P
AGES
:
78-81
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
lexical unit makes themselves a linguistic terminology.
As we mention theory of terminology we can address
to scientific works of A.A.Refortmaskiy, G.O.Vinokur,
V.V. Vinogradov, V.P.Danilenko, V.M. Leychik, D.S.
Lotte. They did their best to research linguistic
terminology. Scientific researches of linguistic
terminology began since 20s-30s of the XX century and
Terminology became as an independent linguistic
discipline it was formed in the early 70s of the same
century. .Despite of many scientific works, the notion
"term" has not a unanimous the definition. For
example, according to Golovin and Kobrin: A term is a
word or subordinate phrase that has a special meaning,
expresses and forms a professional concept and is
used in the process of learning and mastering scientific
and vocational objects and the relations between
them. Terminology is related to the professional field
of activity (field of knowledge, technology,
management, culture) a set of terms related to each
other at the conceptual, lexico-semantic, word-
formation and grammatical levels.[1]
According to I.N.Prokhorova, terms are devoid of
emotional coloring. There are dozens of definitions
and descriptions of the term in Uzbek and Russian
languages, that counted more than twenty. Despite
the fact in the views on the term there are
discrepancies and contrast approaches and method of
researches to explain them, but in many ways, terms
are full members of the lexical system of the language,
which differ in many ways from other lexical units of
the language.
V.M. Leychik in the monograph "Terminology: subject,
methods, structures" identifies and analyzes five
stages in the formation of Russian terminology [2].
Each stage is characterized by the evolution of
knowledge: the data accumulated by generations of
researchers are being refined and described in a new
perspective, deep and detailed.
G.O. Vinokur. and D.S. Lotte investigated the issues of
terminology ordering, the principles of selection and
construction
of individual terms and entire
terminological systems, analyzed the signs, properties
and structure of the term in relation to the concept
expressed by it.
METHODOLOGY
Studying linguistic terminology became important,
that
Russian
and
Uzbek
scientists
studied
systematically them. In contemporary linguistics, two
main approaches are known in the study of the term :
normative and descriptive. In the normative approach,
the term is considered as a lexical unit of a certain type,
having a special semantic and grammatical structure
that distinguishes it from words of a general literary
language. [3].
Linguistic
terminology
characterized
by
such
parameters as complexity, consistency, structurality,
Volume 04 Issue 12-2024
80
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
12
P
AGES
:
78-81
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
functional connectivity, multifunctionality, developing
integrity, integrativity, continuality, openness, are in a
state of dynamic equilibrium under the influence of
multidirectional trends towards conservation and
semantic changes provided by the evolutionary
progressive movement of the development of the
metalanguage.
According to Madina Daliyeva, the professor of
UzSWLU, Linguistic terminology consists of many
subsystems. Terminology is hierarchic and complex
system that, are used to describe language
phenomenon. This system isn't unanimous and unitary;
every term represents various aspects of linguistics.
1. Terms of phonetics and phonology describes sound
aspect of linguistics, phonetics studies physical
features of sounds, phonology studies functional role
of this sounds in the language. For example: sound,
consonant, vowel, syllable, fonema, accent and others
2. Terms of morphology studies wide range of word
formation, forms, category of word: root, suffix, prefix,
noun, verb, adjective and others
3. Terms of syntaxes, describes structures of gaps and
sentences, and relations among them: subject,
predicate, object, clause, subordinate clause and
others
4. Terms of semantics and pragmatics related to the
meaning
of
phrases:
polysemy,
denotation,
connotation, referent, monosemy and others and
terms of pragmatics deal with how context influences
interpretation:
speech
strategy,
speech
act,
implicature and others.
5. Terms of stylistics deal with studying the language,
taking into account situation or sphere of use words
and phrases: style, trope, stylistic colouring, idioms,
irony and others.
Even this classification, cannot cover all specters of
varieties of linguistic terminology. There are also terms
of studying diachrony and synchrony. Syncronic
approach to the language research fixes a certant state
of the language something unchangeable. On the
contrary, the diachronic approach takes into
consideration the charges that evolve the history of
the language. [4].
CONCLUSION
Linguistic terminology does not exist as a single
semiological system, but as a "system of systems". So,
the current stage of terminology development is
characterized by a number of new features
–
interactivity, multi-functionality, a new system, which
requires the development of new conceptual
approaches to The study of this layer of language raises
the question of the boundaries of the linguistic
paradigm, actualizes the problem of scientific
systematization of the terminological units of
linguistics, especially in those sections of it that are
Volume 04 Issue 12-2024
81
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
12
P
AGES
:
78-81
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
formed at the intersection with other sciences. The
interactivity of linguistic knowledge determines the
growth of borrowing, the development of multi-
functionality, the complexity of the terminological
system.
REFERENCES
1.
Головин Б.Н., Кобрин Р.Ю. Лингвистические
основы учениях о терминах. Москва: Высшая
школа, 1987.
-
С. 4
-5.
2.
Лейчик, В.М. Терминоведение: предмет,
методы, структура / В.М. Лейчик. –
3-
е изд. –
М.: Книжный дом «ЛИБРОКОМ», Изд
-
во ЛКИ,
2007.
–
C. 224-231.
3.
Doszhan
G.
The
Mutual
Enrichment
of
Terminological Fund of Turkic Languages in the
Period of Globalization //Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences.
–
2013.
–
Т. 89. –
P. 806-811.
4.
V.P.Danilenko. On Syncronic vs Diachronic
Ideology in Linguistics. //Bulletin of Irkuts State
Linguistic University.
–
2011.
–
№. 4 (16). –
P. 5-11.
