Authors

  • Ixtiyor Ermatov
    Doctor of Philology (DSc), Gulistan State University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue12-18

Keywords:

Term dictionary linguistic dictionary

Abstract

This article discusses the attempts to create the first linguistic dictionaries in Uzbek linguistics, the first linguistic dictionaries, the structure of linguistic dictionaries and the provision of dictionary articles in them, and the issues of compiled dictionaries related to the field of linguistics.  Linguistics dictionaries serve as illustrative material of the article.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

99


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

99-107

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

This article discusses the attempts to create the first linguistic dictionaries in Uzbek linguistics, the first linguistic

dictionaries, the structure of linguistic dictionaries and the provision of dictionary articles in them, and the issues of

compiled dictionaries related to the field of linguistics. Linguistics dictionaries serve as illustrative material of the

article.

KEYWORDS

Term, term, dictionary, dictionary article, linguistic dictionary, lexicon, scientific lexicon.

INTRODUCTION

The creation of terminological systems that meet the

requirements of the time in all fields of science is one

of the urgent issues of today. At the same time, there

is no doubt that their implementation is extremely

complicated and requires a lot of effort.

In particular, the compilation and publication of

terminological dictionaries, especially explanatory

terminological dictionaries, which fully cover the terms

of each field, is important for the successful solution of

all matters related to terminology. In such dictionaries,

it is important to determine the extent to which each

term correctly, fully and accurately expresses the

concept, object and phenomenon that it refers to. This

will determine how specific each term is to the

requirement.

Issues such as terminology and its theoretical

foundations, linguistic terms and their formation and

regulation in world linguistics are discussed by V.V.

Research Article

TERMINOLOGICAL DICTIONARIES RELATED TO LINGUISTICS

Submission Date:

December 08, 2024,

Accepted Date:

December 13, 2024,

Published Date:

December 18, 2024

Crossref doi

:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue12-18


Ixtiyor Ermatov

Doctor of Philology (DSc), Gulistan State University, Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajps

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

100


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

99-107

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

Vinogradov [3, 560], A.A. Reformatsky [18, 54], O.S.

Akhmanova [1, 608], V.P. Danilenko [4, 225] specially

studied in the research of scientists. Similar issues,

issues of the formation and development of linguistic

terminological systems, deficiencies and defects in

linguistic terminologies, synonymy and its elimination

problems are discussed in Azerbaijani [5, 63], Kazakh

[6, 83], Kyrgyz [13, 65], Karakalpak [11, 66] and the

terminology of the main Turkic languages and the Tajik

language [15, 124].

In Uzbek linguistics, A. Ghulomov [20, 56], V.V.

Reshetov [17, 119], A. Hojiyev [26, 144], L.V. Reshetova

[22, 56], D. Khudoyberganova [21, 44], I. In

monographs, dissertations and dictionaries of Ermatov

[19, 160] and others illuminated.

Mahmud Koshgari and Alisher Navoi described the

differences of the sound system of Turkic languages

from other languages, in particular from Arabic and

Persian-Tajik languages. In particular, Alisher Navoi

also thought about the unique vowel system of the

Turkic (Uzbek) language, but the formation of

phonetics as a separate field of linguistics occurred at

the beginning of the 20th century [10, 387].

Ayub Ghulam's scientific work published in 1940 has a

special place in the creation and unification of linguistic

terms in the Uzbek language [20, 56].

Ayub Ghulam's "Program and methodical instruction

from the Uzbek language. "Manual for external

pedagogic educational institutions" was published in

Tashkent in 1940 with the permission of the People's

Commissariat of Education. This manual provides a

Russian-Uzbek dictionary of linguistic terms. Through

this dictionary, the scientist introduced many Russian

linguistic terms into the Uzbek language, which are

mainly phonetic terms: speech organs, respiratory

apparatus, place of articulation, method of

articulation.

The scientist has mastered many linguistic terms in the

dictionary by translating them into Uzbek. For

example: gortan

bo‘g‘iz, labializovannie glasnie –

lablashgan unlilar, zvonkie zvuki

jarangli tovushlar,

gluxie zvuki

jarangsiz tovushlar, slog

bo‘g‘in,

udarenie

urg‘u, osnova –

asos, pryamaya rech

ko‘chirma gap, svyazka –

bog‘lama (given in uzbek).

The dictionary of Uzbek-Russian linguistic terms

attached to Ayub Ghulam's "Uzbek language program

and methodical instruction" contains terms expressing

the concepts of phonetics and syntax. In the

"Dictionary"

the

terms

indicative

sentence,

interrogative

sentence,

exclamatory

sentence,

secondary clauses, complement, determiner, case,

compound sentence, sentence fragments, extended

sentence are given in the "Dictionary". There is also a

Russian version of these terms.

This was the first dictionary of Uzbek-Russian linguistic

terms in Uzbek linguistics. Linguistic terms included in


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

101


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

99-107

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

this dictionary are listed in the order of phonetics,

morphology, and syntax sections. We also describe the

terms in the dictionary in this order and according to

the aspect of practical use and non-use:

Phonetic terms used in practice: vowels, consonants,

voiced sounds, unvoiced sounds, syllable, stress.

Morphology terms used in practice: adverb, auxiliary,

conjunction, prepositions, adverb (verb case),

adjective (verb quality), root word, artificial word, etc.

Syntax terms used in practice: indicative sentence,

interrogative

sentence,

derivative

sentence,

possessive sentence, exclamatory sentence, simple

sentence, clauses, possessive, participle, complement,

determiner, etc.

A number of terms used by Ayub Ghulam are not

currently used due to the discovery of suitable

alternatives in the further development of Uzbek

linguistics. For example: repeated vowels, repeated

consonants. To name the linguistic concepts expressed

in these terms, the terms double vowels and double

consonants are currently used, and they clearly and

completely reflect the essence of the linguistic

concept. Already, the word "double" in relation to the

repeated word clearly expresses that the sounds are

two, besides, the next term (double) has brevity and

brevity.

In the dictionary of Ayub Ghulam:

a) terms in the form of simple words: adverbial,

adjective, adverbial, auxiliary, connective, predicate;

b) compound terms: independent words, auxiliary

words, artificial words, compound words, interjections

[20, 56].

In 1980, A. Hojiyev and L. Reshetova co-authored "Brief

Annotated Dictionary of Grammatical Terms of the

Uzbek Language" [22, 56], and in 1985, A. Hojiyev's

"Annotated Dictionary of Linguistic Terms" was

published by "Teacher" publishing house. ati" [26, 144]

was published. A. Hojiyev reworked and perfected this

dictionary, and "Annotated Dictionary of Linguistic

Terms" with eleven printed plates was created [27,

168]. This dictionary includes "Glossary", "Size and

structure

of

the

dictionary",

"Conventional

abbreviations", "Main part" (explanation of terms

arranged alphabetically), "Index" (short Uzbek-

Russian terminological dictionary) consists of such

parts, the terms are explained as follows:

Link. An auxiliary verb that adapts a non-verb word to

the meaning and function of the verb...(p. 24).

Point. A punctuation mark (.) used in conditional

abbreviations is used at the end of a sentence and an

exclamatory sentence spoken in a calm tone [27, 73].

Vocabulary. A specific form of a word that takes part in

speech [27, 98].


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

102


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

99-107

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

Importantly, the glossary provides excellent and

concise explanations for each key term.

About the size and structure of the dictionary, it is said:

"When determining the vocabulary of the dictionary,

that is, whether to include this or that term in the

dictionary, it is necessary to study it in the literature of

the Uzbek language, on linguistics courses. In the

course of teaching work, attention was paid to

whether it was used or not, and the level of use. More

specifically, only the terms that exist in the Uzbek

language and express the phenomena specific to this

language and the phenomena common to all

languages were included in the dictionary" [27, 5].

In the dictionary, the determiner, singular, plural,

conjunction, connection, writing, pronoun, noun

auxiliaries, migration, word, language, accent, sound,

exclamation are originally Uzbek. ,

phrase, spelling, dictionary, proverb, standard, speech,

point, adjective, etc. are originally Arabic, Persian-Tajik,

such as name, idiom, sentence,

Russian-international terms such as phonetics,

morphology, syntax, term, suffix, prefix, infix,

pleonasm,

polysemy,

paraphrase,

period

are

expressed.

At the same time, in the dictionary, Uzbek compounds

such as singular number, plural number, separated

part, conjunctions of subtraction, determining

structure, case of departure, introductory word,

defining component are included in the rules of the

Uzbek language. provided as adapted.

Russian-internationally

determined

component

compounds in the form of affixal word formation,

dialectal vocabulary, agglutinative languages, locative

sentence, lexical meaning, morphological word,

paradigmatic series, polytonic accent, rhetorical

question, and vice versa , the valence of the word, the

second component of which is Russian-international,

the variants of the word, the evolution of the language,

the timbre of the sound, and the combinations in the

form of isofa are also perfect and provided with

concise comments.

During the transition from a certain socio-economic

condition to another socio-economic condition and

after that, great changes occur in the life of society.

Such changes are also reflected in the language,

because the language develops along with the

development of society. There is also the fact that no

matter how much the society develops, the names of

things and events in the language remain unchanged

for a certain period of time. As concepts disappear or

are renamed, earlier words begin to disappear as well.

That is why there are no sudden interruptions in the

language.

The history of the formation of some terminological

systems of the Uzbek language dates back to the


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

103


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

99-107

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

distant past. Of course, the works created in such fields

as history, literature, music, medicine, astronomy,

chemistry, and mathematics use the terms of these

fields. For example, a group of lexicographers stated

that "the word algorithm originates from the name of

the great Uzbek scientist Muhammad ibn Musa al-

Khorazmi, who lived in the 9th century. Arabic al-

Khorazmi means "Khorazmian" or is in the form of a

Latinized algorithm" [28, 256]. However, the history of

the emergence and creation of Uzbek linguistic terms

is a product of the recent past compared to the terms

of the above fields.

One of the positive aspects of this dictionary is that it

also provides the etymology of Russian-international

terms. For example:

Lexicon (Greek lexikos - word-related, dictionary).

[note].

Adjunct (lat. adjunctus - joined together). [note].

Hyphen (German Dyevis < Latin divisio - division).

[note] and others.

About the structure of the dictionary articles, it is said:

"Another part of the dictionary article is the examples

that confirm the explanation given to the term. But an

example proving an explanation is not found in all

dictionary articles, but only dictionary articles compiled

for certain terms require an example" [27, 6]. For

example:

Link. [note]. For example, Talib became an artist, Talib

is becoming an artist, Talib is going to be an artist, the

auxiliary be is used with the word artist and serves to

express the meaning of mood, tense, person-number,

in the participle ana enables the realization of these

meanings.

Dialectisms. [note]. For example, jaman (bad), choch

(hair) - phonetic dialectism; patinjon (tomato), bolish

(pillow) - lexical dialectisms; I saw it on the street (I saw

it on the street) - like a grammatical dialectic.

From the dictionary, root base, sentence, word, irony,

dictionary,

metaphor,

text,

proverb,

speech,

composition,

coloring,

writing,

dissonance,

interpretation,

agreement,

participle,

transfer,

indicator, There are also terms such as adverbial,

adverbial, adjective, consonant, adjective, low

productivity, verb part, noun part, proper noun, double

negation. received This can create certain ideas about

the formation of linguistic terms.

It is known that linguistic concepts are also expressed

by means of compound terms. In works devoted to the

research of the terminological systems of the Uzbek

language, terms based on the syntactic relationship of

two or more words are called compound terms, and

this term has been stabilized in terminological studies.

Therefore, we also used the term compound term.

Compound terms [4, 131] form the main part of

terminological systems. Because in many studies,


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

104


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

99-107

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

compound terms were created when it was impossible

to name the concepts of the field with simple basic or

artificially simple terms. In particular, out of 1002 terms

in A. Hojiyev's "Annotated Dictionary of Linguistic

Terms", 462 are simple words, 540 are compound

terms [19, 65].

"Until the last years of the former Soviet period,

teaching of the mother tongue, along with other

subjects, was not given sufficient attention" [9, 56].

Mother tongue school textbooks are no exception.

Even before independence, opinions were expressed

that the mother tongue textbooks did not meet the

requirements. In the March 18, 1987 issue of "Teachers'

newspaper" A. Hojiyev's article "Let the textbooks be

at the level of demand" was devoted to the same

problem, in which the textbooks of that time were

correctly and objectively evaluated. was There are

enough problems in the terminology of linguistics, and

since the first years of independence, the

improvement of native language textbooks and the

application of scientific achievements to them have

been set as the main agenda item [19, 98].

The study, improvement and regulation of the

terminology of Uzbek linguistics after the 60s is

associated with the name of A. Hojiyev. In his studies

on almost all levels of the Uzbek language, in his

dictionaries of linguistic terms, he has scientifically

based recommendations on the correct creation and

correct use of relevant terms. gave, literally formed the

terminology of modern Uzbek linguistics [19, 52].

Y. Tojiyev, K. Kadirov, Sh. Bobomurodova, T. Togayev,

B. Toychiboyev, M. Qurbonova, I. Ermatov and others

have a special place in the study of the history of Uzbek

linguistics and linguistic terminology. .

In 2013, "Annotated Dictionary of Linguistic Terms"

created by authors N. Mahkamov and I. Ermatov was

published in "Fan" publishing house in 1000 copies.

One of the first tasks of specialists in these fields is to

create explanatory terminological dictionaries that

cover the terms of each field as fully as possible, define

the terms that correctly, fully and accurately reflect the

essence of the phenomenon. Academician A. Hojiyev's

"Explanatory Dictionary of Linguistic Terms" published

by "Teacher" publishing house in 1985 is used as the

only and most important source.

For almost thirty years, this explanatory dictionary has

been used by teachers and students of higher

education, secondary special vocational education and

general education schools.

In connection with the granting of the status of the

state language to the Uzbek language, the dictionary

was reworked and published. (A. Hojiyev. "Explanatory

dictionary of linguistic terms", publishing house

"National Encyclopedia of Uzbekistan", Tashkent,

2002).


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

105


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

99-107

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

During

the

period

of

independence,

wide

opportunities were created for the development of the

Uzbek language. Especially in connection with the

adoption of the Law "On Education" in 1997, special

attention was paid to study and teaching. State

educational standards have been developed. As a

result, new programs and textbooks were created. In

particular, a new generation of native language

textbooks has emerged.

"Annotated Dictionary of Linguistic Terms" created by

N.Mahkamov and I.Ermatov differs from previous

annotated dictionaries in that, firstly, it was created for

students of general education schools, academic

lyceums and vocational colleges, and secondly,

annotations it is given on the basis of native language

textbooks created for general education schools,

academic lyceums and vocational colleges.

The explanatory dictionary includes the main terms

used and used in the period from the terms used in the

first native language textbooks created at the

beginning of the 20th century to the current mother

tongue textbooks.

When commenting on linguistic terms, the attention is

mainly focused on the terms in the current mother

tongue textbooks and they are explained. Terms

created in the past, but not used in current textbooks,

are included and explained. Because the terms in all

native language textbooks, regardless of the scope

and period of their use, undoubtedly had an impact on

the formation and development of linguistic terms of

the next period.

More than one and a half thousand terms are covered

and explained in this explanatory dictionary of

linguistic terms.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, it can be said that until dictionaries are

created, various negative phenomena in the

terminological system, for example, the use of more

than one term to express the same concept and, on the

contrary, the use of one term to express several

(different) phenomena llation, the existence of terms

that cannot correctly, fully and clearly express the

essence of the phenomenon, and other negative

phenomena continue.

REFERENCES

1.

Ахманова

О.С.

Словарь

лингвистических

терминов. Изд. 2. –

М.: Советская энциклопедия,

1969.

608 с.

2.

Амансарыев Ж. Туркмен дилининг лингвистик

терминлерини дузгуне салмак хакында. –

Ашгабад, 1951. –

20 б.

3.

Виноградов

В.В.

Избранные

труды:

Исследования по русской грамматике. –

М.:

Наука, 1975. –

560 с.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

106


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

99-107

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

4.

Даниленко В.П. Русская терминология. Опыт

лингвистического описания. –

М.: 1977. –

225 с.

5.

Дилчилик терминл

ә

ри

лу

ғә

ти

/

редакторлары

:

Р

.

Руст

ә

мов

,

М

.

Шир

ә

лиев

,

Ж

.

Ә

ф

ә

ндиев

.

Бакы

,

1957.

63

б

.

6.

Кенесбаев С., Жануза

қ

ов

Т

.

Лингвистикалы

қ

терминдерд

i

ң

қ

ыс

қ

аша

орысша

-

қ

аза

қ

ша

созд

i

г

i.

Алматы

, 1956.

83

б

.

7.

Кенесбаев С., Жануза

қ

ов

Т

.

Русско

-

казахский

словарь

лингвистических

терминов

.

Алма

-

ата

,

1966.

8.

Mahkamov

N.,

Ermatov

I.

Tilshunoslik

ter

minlarining izohli lug‘ati. –

T.: Fan, 2013.

144 b.

9.

Мирза

қ

улов

Т

.

Грамматика

ў

қ

итишнинг

лингвистик

асослари

.

Т

.:

Ў

қ

итувчи

, 1994.

56

б

.

10.

Нурмонов А. Танланган асарлар. 3 жилдлик. 2

-

жилд: Лингвистик таълимотлар тарихи. –

Т.:

Akademnashr, 2012.

448 б.

11.

Насыров Д.С., Бекбергенов А., Жарымбетов А.

Русша

қ

ара

қ

алпа

қ

ша

лингвистикалы

қ

терминлар

созлиги

.

Нокис

, 1979.

12.

Оруджев А.А. Основные принципы составления

терминологии // Труды Института языка АН

Азербайджана, т. I. –

Баку, 1967.

13.

Орузбаева Б.О. Русско

-

киргизский словарь

лингвистических терминов. –

Фрунзе, 1972.

14.

Пирниязов К. Формирование и развитие

каракалпакской

лингвистической

терминологии. Автореф. дисс. ....канд. филол.

нук. –

Алма

-

ата: 1981. –

28 с.

15.

Рустамов М. Таджикская грамматическая

терминология. –

Душанбе: Дониш, 1972. –

124 с.

16.

Решетова Л.В. Грамматическая терминология

узбекского языка: Автореф. дисс. ... канд. филол.

наук. –

Т., 1964. –

22 с.

17.

Решетов

В.В.

Краткий

справочник

по

лингвистической терминологии. –

Т.,

1950.

119 с.

18.

Реформатский А.А. Что такое термин и

терминология // Вопросы терминологии. –

М.:

Изд. АН СССР, 1961. –

С. 46

-54.

19.

Эрматов И. Ўзбек тилшунослик терминларининг

шаклланиши ва тара

ққ

иёти

(

умумий

ўрта

таълим

мактабларининг

дарсликлари

асосида): Филол.

фан. бўйича фалсафа докт. ... дисс. –

Тошкент,

2019.

160 б.

20.

Ғ

улом

А

.

Ўзбек

тилидан

программа

ва

методик

кўрсатма

.

Сирт

қ

и

педагогика

билим

юртлари

учун

.

Т

.: 1940.

56

б

.

21.

Худойберганова

Д.

Лингвокультурология

терминларининг

қ

ис

қ

ача изо

ҳ

ли

лу

ғ

ати

.

Т

.:

Turon zamin ziyo, 2015.

44

б

.

22.

Ҳ

ожиев

А

.,

Решетова

Л

.

Ўзбек

тили

грамматик

терминларининг

қ

ис

қ

ача

изо

ҳ

ли

лу

ғ

ати

.

–Т

.:

Ў

қ

итувчи

, 1980.

56

б

.

23.

Ҳ

ожиев

А

.

Термин

танлаш

мезонлари

.

Т

.:

Фан

,

1996.

46

б

.

24.

Ҳ

ожиев

А

.

Ўзбек

тили

морфологияси,

морфемикаси ва сўз ясалишининг назарий

масалалари. –

Т.: Фан, 2010. –

256 б.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 12-2024

107


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

12

P

AGES

:

99-107

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

25.

Ҳ

ожиев

А

.

Ўзбек

тилшунослик

терминологиясининг

ҳ

озирги

а

ҳ

воли

ҳ

а

қ

ида

/

Ўзбек

тили

терминологияси

ва

унинг

тара

ққ

иёт

перспективалари

. I

Республика

терминология

конференцияси материаллари. –

Т.: Фан, 1986.

26.

Ҳ

ожиев

А

.

Лингвистик

терминларнинг

изо

ҳ

ли

лу

ғ

ати

.

–Т

.:

Ў

қ

итувчи

, 1985.

144

б

.

27.

Ҳ

ожиев

А

.

Тилшунослик

терминларнинг

изо

ҳ

ли

лу

ғ

ати

.

–Т

.:

Ўзбекистон

миллий

энциклопедияси

,

2002.

168

б

.

28.

Ҳ

асанбоев

Ж., Тўра

қ

улов

Х

.,

Ҳ

айдаров

М

.,

Ҳ

асанбоева

О

.,

Усмонов

Н

.

Педагогика

фанидан

изо

ҳ

ли

лу

ғ

ат

.

Т

.:

Фан

ва

технология

, 2009.

References

Ахманова О.С. Словарь лингвистических терминов. Изд. 2. – М.: Советская энциклопедия, 1969. – 608 с.

Амансарыев Ж. Туркмен дилининг лингвистик терминлерини дузгуне салмак хакында. – Ашгабад, 1951. – 20 б.

Виноградов В.В. Избранные труды: Исследования по русской грамматике. – М.: Наука, 1975. – 560 с.

Даниленко В.П. Русская терминология. Опыт лингвистического описания. – М.: 1977. – 225 с.

Дилчилик терминләри луғәти / редакторлары: Р.Рустәмов, М.Ширәлиев, Ж. Әфәндиев. – Бакы, 1957. – 63 б.

Кенесбаев С., Жанузақов Т. Лингвистикалық терминдердiң қысқаша орысша-қазақша создiгi. – Алматы, 1956. – 83 б.

Кенесбаев С., Жанузақов Т. Русско-казахский словарь лингвистических терминов. – Алма-ата, 1966.

Mahkamov N., Ermatov I. Tilshunoslik terminlarining izohli lug‘ati. – T.: Fan, 2013. – 144 b.

Мирзақулов Т. Грамматика ўқитишнинг лингвистик асослари. – Т.: Ўқитувчи, 1994. – 56 б.

Нурмонов А. Танланган асарлар. 3 жилдлик. 2-жилд: Лингвистик таълимотлар тарихи. – Т.: Akademnashr, 2012. – 448 б.

Насыров Д.С., Бекбергенов А., Жарымбетов А. Русша – қарақалпақша лингвистикалық терминлар созлиги. – Нокис, 1979.

Оруджев А.А. Основные принципы составления терминологии // Труды Института языка АН Азербайджана, т. I. – Баку, 1967.

Орузбаева Б.О. Русско-киргизский словарь лингвистических терминов. – Фрунзе, 1972.

Пирниязов К. Формирование и развитие каракалпакской лингвистической терминологии. Автореф. дисс. ....канд. филол. нук. – Алма-ата: 1981. – 28 с.

Рустамов М. Таджикская грамматическая терминология. – Душанбе: Дониш, 1972. – 124 с.

Решетова Л.В. Грамматическая терминология узбекского языка: Автореф. дисс. ... канд. филол. наук. – Т., 1964. – 22 с.

Решетов В.В. Краткий справочник по лингвистической терминологии. – Т., 1950. – 119 с.

Реформатский А.А. Что такое термин и терминология // Вопросы терминологии. – М.: Изд. АН СССР, 1961. – С. 46-54.

Эрматов И. Ўзбек тилшунослик терминларининг шаклланиши ва тараққиёти (умумий ўрта таълим мактабларининг дарсликлари асосида): Филол. фан. бўйича фалсафа докт. ... дисс. – Тошкент, 2019. – 160 б.

Ғулом А. Ўзбек тилидан программа ва методик кўрсатма. Сиртқи педагогика билим юртлари учун. – Т.: 1940. – 56 б.

Худойберганова Д. Лингвокультурология терминларининг қисқача изоҳли луғати. – Т.: Turon zamin ziyo, 2015. – 44 б.

Ҳожиев А., Решетова Л. Ўзбек тили грамматик терминларининг қисқача изоҳли луғати. –Т.: Ўқитувчи, 1980. – 56 б.

Ҳожиев А. Термин танлаш мезонлари. – Т.: Фан, 1996. – 46 б.

Ҳожиев А. Ўзбек тили морфологияси, морфемикаси ва сўз ясалишининг назарий масалалари. – Т.: Фан, 2010. – 256 б.

Ҳожиев А. Ўзбек тилшунослик терминологиясининг ҳозирги аҳволи ҳақида / Ўзбек тили терминологияси ва унинг тараққиёт перспективалари. I Республика терминология конференцияси материаллари. – Т.: Фан, 1986.

Ҳожиев А. Лингвистик терминларнинг изоҳли луғати. –Т.: Ўқитувчи, 1985. – 144 б.

Ҳожиев А. Тилшунослик терминларнинг изоҳли луғати. –Т.: Ўзбекистон миллий энциклопедияси, 2002. – 168 б.

Ҳасанбоев Ж., Тўрақулов Х., Ҳайдаров М., Ҳасанбоева О., Усмонов Н. Педагогика фанидан изоҳли луғат. – Т.: Фан ва технология, 2009.