Authors

  • Ruziboyev Fakhriddin Sohibjon ugli
    Researcher at Namangan State University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume04Issue11-02

Keywords:

Court decision decree

Abstract

This article provides information about the reforms in the judicial system as a result of the socio-political processes that took place in Turkestan in the first quarter of the 20th century and the decrees adopted by the Soviets as a result of replacing the old judicial system with a new one and their historical significance.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

8


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

8-14

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

This article provides information about the reforms in the judicial system as a result of the socio-political processes

that took place in Turkestan in the first quarter of the 20th century and the decrees adopted by the Soviets as a result

of replacing the old judicial system with a new one and their historical significance.

KEYWORDS

Court, decision, decree, district court, cassation, appeal, jurisdiction, people's courts, judge.

INTRODUCTION

By 1917, a coup was carried out in the Russian Empire.

That is, the Romanov dynasty, which ruled the Empire

for several centuries, left the throne. The revolution

was caused by the disproportion of the national

economy, its division into the rapidly developing

industrial sector, and the stagnation of agriculture. [1.

19] The wave of the revolution also affected Turkestan.

In the spring of 1917, the Soviet of Workers' and

Soldiers' Deputies began to be formed in Tashkent.

Soon they united into a single Tashkent Soviet of

Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies. In this, the principle

of class was taken into consideration. Therefore, most

of the deputies were Europeans[2. 20]. On June 21,

1917, the Tashkent branch of the Russian Social

Democratic Party proclaimed "all power to the

Soviets" [3. 2].

In the process of establishing a democratic

government, the interim government made changes in

Research Article

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DECREES ADOPTED IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF
THE SOVIET COURT SYSTEM IN TURKESTAN

Submission Date:

October 26, 2024,

Accepted Date:

October 31, 2024,

Published Date:

November 05, 2024

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume04Issue11-02


Ruziboyev Fakhriddin Sohibjon ugli

Researcher at Namangan State University, Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajsshr

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

9


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

8-14

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

the judicial system, including the abolition of the death

penalty and the abolition of military courts [4. 9].

On October 24, 1917, an armed uprising began in

Petrograd. The Communist Party and its leader V.I. The

forces of workers, soldiers and peasants led by Lenin

came

to

power.

The

October

Revolution

fundamentally changed the way of social life that had

been formed for many centuries not only in Russia but

also in other countries [5. 6].

These events, in turn, meant the beginning of another

transformation process in the judicial system of the

Turkestan region. Before the beginning of these

political processes, even during the period of the

empire that ruled the region, innovations were

introduced to the judicial system based on the national

values of Turkestan for many years. But he did not dare

to completely destroy the traditional courts, i.e. judges

and judges. In particular, articles related to the judicial

system were included in the Regulations on

management, which depend on the socio-political,

economic, administrative-territorial fate of the region.

Nevertheless, together with the people's courts

introduced by the Russians, despite the fact that their

powers were quite narrow, the national courts

continued their activities [6. 66].

METHODS

In this article, the formal literature created in the first

half of the 20th century and the decisions made in that

period, the Regulations, are the primary source for

explaining the research work. Including V. A. Kozlov, S.

D. Murashevsky, SH. Tashliyev's works provide

information about the management policy of the

Soviet government and socio-political processes at

that time, and the scientific articles of Yu.G.

Shpakovskiy and A.V. Babenko provide information

about the history of the formation of the Soviet judicial

system.

The article uses methods such as historical comparison

and analysis of scientific research.

RESULTS

After the collapse of the empire and the coming to

power of the Soviets, another period of changes in the

traditional courts of Turkestan began. In particular, on

December 5, 1917, the leader of the Soviet government

V.I. In accordance with Lenin's decree, on December 12,

1917, the Council of People's Commissars of Turkestan

issued a decree "On the reorganization of the judicial

institutions of the Turkestan region." According to the

decree, all previously existing general judicial

institutions: district courts, court chambers and

military courts were abolished. People's courts formed

on the basis of democratic elections were introduced

instead of the bourgeois court, which protects the

interests of the exploiters and is, in the words of the

Soviets, an instrument of brutal invasion.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

10


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

8-14

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

After the Soviets strengthened their power, they

gradually began to reorganize the governing bodies of

the national republics. The judicial system of Turkestan

was no exception. Since 1917, the Council of People's

Commissars began issuing decisions related to the

judicial system. It was determined that the people's

courts in Turkestan will operate on the basis of these

decrees.

DISCUSSION

On November 22, 1917, the first decree on the judicial

system was adopted. According to its paragraph 1, 1)

Abolition of the existing general court system

the following judicial institutions: district courts,

judicial chambers and all departments of the governing

Senate, military and all types of naval courts, as well as

commercial courts were set to be replaced by courts

formed on the basis of democratic elections.

In accordance with paragraph 2, the judges, hitherto

elected by indirect elections, will be replaced by local

courts consisting of a permanent judge and two

permanent advisers nominated for each session on the

basis of special lists of permanent judges, suspending

the current justices of the peace. set to stand. Also,

Local Judges shall henceforth be appointed on the

basis of direct democratic elections and until such

elections are appointed temporarily - by district and

volost, if not available - workers', soldiers' and

peasants' deputies by district, city and it was

introduced as a rule to be elected by regional councils.

The decree included more provisions related to the

powers of local courts. Local courts handle all civil

cases up to 3,000 rubles, and in criminal cases can

sentence the accused to imprisonment for not more

than 2 years, only if the civil claim does not exceed

3,000 rubles. Judgments and decisions of local courts

are final and cannot be appealed. A fine of more than

100 rubles or for a period of more than 7 days cassation

appeal is allowed in cases related to deprivation of

liberty. The cassation instance is the district, and in the

capitals it is the capital congress of local judges.

According to paragraph 3, judicial investigators,

prosecutor supervision institutions, as well as judges

and private advocacy institutions, which existed until

now, will be abolished, until the entire judicial process

is changed, the preliminary investigation of criminal

cases will be entrusted only to local judges, and their

that decisions on private detention and trial must be

approved by the decision of the entire local court, and

that all citizens of both sexes enjoying civil rights are

allowed to participate as lawyers in the preliminary

investigation phase and in civil cases as prosecutors

and defenders was set as In paragraph 4, court

decisions, ranks of preliminary investigation and

prosecutor's supervision, as well as councils of sworn

lawyers are specially elected by the respective local

Councils of Workers', Soldiers' and Peasants' Deputies


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

11


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

8-14

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

to accept and further direct cases and proceedings.

Commissioners are responsible for the archives and

property of these institutions. It was ordered that all

subordinates and priests of the dissolved institutions

should remain in their places and, under the general

direction of the commissioners, carry out all the

necessary work on the unfinished works, as well as

provide information about the state activities to the

interested persons.

It can be said that the radical renewal of the court's

activity is an effort to ensure that it is based on

democratic principles.

Clause 5 deals with the functioning of courts in national

republics, where local courts decide cases in the name

of the Russian Republic and in their decisions and

judgments follow laws that have not been abrogated

by the revolution and do not conflict with the

revolutionary conscience and revolutionary sense of

justice. it is said that they do.

This decision required local courts to obey the Soviet

ideology. This can be seen in the norm that all laws that

contradict the decisions of the Central Executive

Committee of the Soviets of Workers, Soldiers and

Peasants' Deputies and the Workers' and Peasants'

Government, as well as the minimal programs of the

Russian

Social-Democratic

revolutionaries,

are

recognized as null and void.

In all disputed civil cases, as well as in personal criminal

cases, the parties may apply to the arbitration court.

The working procedure of the arbitration court is

defined by a special decision.

Pursuant to paragraph 7, the right to pardon and

restore the rights of persons convicted of criminal

cases is determined to belong to the judicial authority.

He ensured that the center of activity of everydiv

organized by the Soviets to preserve and strengthen

the victory of the revolution would be this. To fight

against counter-revolutionary forces in the form of

taking measures to protect the revolution and its

achievements, as well as to solve cases of fighting

against looting and looting, sabotage and other abuses

by merchants, industrialists, officials and other

persons, workers and peasant revolutionary tribunals

were formed consisting of a chairman and six

permanent councilors elected by the workers',

soldiers' and peasants' deputies from the regional and

city councils.

In 1918, another court decree was passed. In practice,

this was an addition to the 1917 decree. The first part of

the decree provides information about the rules of

procedure for the establishment of district people's

courts. In particular, it states that district people's

courts will be established to hear cases beyond the

jurisdiction of the local people's court, whose

members will be elected by the district by the local


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

12


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

8-14

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

councils of workers', soldiers' and peasants' deputies.

The general meeting of the members of the District

People's Court determines the number of civil and

criminal departments, each of which is chaired by at

least two permanent members. The number of court

members may be increased or decreased by the local

Councils of Workers', Soldiers' and Peasants' Deputies

on their own initiative or at the request of the courts.

The members of the court elect the chairman of the

court and the chairman of the department from among

themselves, recall them and elect other persons in

their place. Elected members of the court, with the

exception of the chairpersons, are recalled by the

Councils that elected them. All preparatory actions for

the trial are resolved collegially by at least three

permanent members of the district people's court. In

the departments of civil affairs, cases are decided on

their merits with the participation of three permanent

members of the district people's court and four

people's advisers. Decisions on the merits of criminal

cases are made by twelve permanent and two reserve

judges under the chairmanship of one of the

permanent members of the court [7. 466].

The second part of the decree is about the cassation

procedure. It is established that the permanent

members of the people's courts shall elect the

appropriate number of members of the regional court

at the general meeting of the regional court for the

consideration of complaints.

The third part consists of provisions on the supervision

of the Supreme Court. In order to achieve uniformity in

the cassation practice of both assemblies of local

people's judges and regional people's courts,

supervision of the Supreme Court was established in

the city of Petrograd. The Supreme Court supervises

and issues judgments issued by all courts. Decisions

issued by the Supreme Court could only be overturned

by the legislature of the empire. The fourth part is

about the judicial process and jurisdiction. In its first

article, it is allowed to speak in all local languages in

courts of instance. Civil and criminal trials were

conducted according to the Rules of Court of 1864.

Cases not exceeding 3000 rubles, such as civil

documents, wills, adoptions, were transferred to the

jurisdiction of district courts [7. 469].

The fifth part is about court fees and costs. In civil and

criminal courts, as well as in arbitration courts, it is

established that a court fee, which is determined until

a special decision, is collected for civil claims with a

value of more than 100 rubles, for cases of more than

100 rubles [7. 470].

The sixth part deals with the preliminary investigation,

and the preliminary investigation of criminal cases

outside the jurisdiction of the Local Court is carried out

by the three directly elected Councils of Workers',

Soldiers' and Peasants' Deputies. it is noted that it will

be carried out by investigation commissions consisting

of individuals.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

13


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

8-14

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

According to the section 7 about the prosecution and

defense, in particular, the court investigation should be

conducted with the participation of the accuser and

the defender, the formation of a collegium of persons

dedicated to legal representation as a form of public

protection at the Councils of Workers', Soldiers' and

Peasants' Deputies, workers to these collegiums ,

persons elected and recalled by the Soviets of Soldiers'

and Peasants' Deputies, the court could propose a

state prosecutor from the above-mentioned panels of

lawyers for each case.

The eighth part is about the people's councilors and

the judicial investigation, the people's councilors are

allowed to participate in the judicial investigation, and

they are also given the right to oppose all the

chairpersons appointed to this meeting. The People's

Counsel decides not only the fact of the crime but also

the amount of punishment, and they have the right to

reduce the punishment prescribed by law according to

their belief, until the accused is exempted from any

punishment.

The ninth part deals with complaints, pardons and

restoration of rights. In particular, it is not allowed to

appeal against the verdict of acquittal, mitigation of

punishment and complete release of the accused from

punishment.

The tenth part provides rules on the execution of

decisions and sentences. In particular, the decisions

and judgments of the elected executive bodies will

henceforth be implemented in accordance with the

previously effective order, replacing the members of

the police where the Red Guard is present. And in the

eleventh part, about existing laws, that is, when

considering civil and criminal cases, the court shall

follow the civil and criminal laws in force until now,

provided that they are invalidated by the decisions of

the Central Executive Committee and the Council of

People's Commissars. in the event that it is not done

and does not contradict the law [7. 473].

Finally, in the last and twelfth part, the general rules

are defined that preliminary determination of

boundaries for regional people's courts, determination

of the number of elected members, as well as control

of the Supreme Court, convening of the first sessions

belong to the People's Commissariat of Justice [7.

474].

СONCLUSION

Therefore, the Bolsheviks, who came to power after

the Russian Empire was abolished, called themselves

the legal heirs of the Russian Empire. But not a

monarchy like an empire, on the contrary, the middle

class of workers and soldiers announced state traps

that protect the interests of the peasants. The Soviets

also did not want the colonial nations under the empire

to become independent, so they tried to save them as

much as possible. In particular, in the reforms made in


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

14


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

P

AGES

:

8-14

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

the management system, the socialist ideology was

instilled into the activity content of all bodies. For

example, Lenin said about this... we did not reform the

old court, we ended it immediately, we turned it into a

tool of the socialist society. [8. 210] The Soviet

authorities were so cunning that they implemented

reforms in the political life of the Turkestan region not

at once, quickly, but slowly. As seen above, as

evidenced by the decrees adopted by the court, only

some changes were made in the first year of 1917, and

by 1918, the scope of the reform expanded and many

innovations were introduced into the judicial system.

The traditional courts in Turkestan, which were

functioning during this period, submitted reports only

to the RSFSR. That is, it was not independent. Also,

cases of state importance were handled through

central court bodies. Thus, Decree No. 1 unified the

multi-system model of the judicial system of the period

before October, and Decree No. 2 completed it. [9. 107]

The first regulatory document that laid the foundation

for the formation of the Soviet judicial system was the

decree adopted by the Council of People's Commissars

on December 7, 1917 [10 251].

REFERENCES

1.

Kozlov V. A. History of the Fatherland: people,

ideas, solutions. Essays on the history of the Soviet

state.

Moscow., 1991.

366 p.

2.

Turkestan at the beginning of the 20th century: On

the history of the origins of national independence

// Team of authors: R. M. Abdullaev, S. S.

Agzamkhodzhaev, I. A. Alimov and others/.

T.:

“Sharq”, 2000,—

672 p.

3.

Murashevsky S.D. Materials on the history of the

October Revolution in Turkestan. - Tashkent, 1922.

47 p.

4.

History of Russia from 1917 to 1945: Textbook.

Benefit.

Ivanovo, 2009.

200 p.

5.

The Great Russian Revolution of 1917 in the

destinies of countries and peoples of the world.

Sat. scientific Art. edited by L.I. Galliamova.

Vladivostok: INAE FEB RAS, 2018. 410 p.

6.

Tashliev Sh. Establishment and strengthening of

Soviet power in Turkestan.

Ashgabat:

Turkmengosizdat. 1957.

145 p.

7.

Decrees of the Soviet government. T.I. M., State

Political Publishing House. literature, 1957.

8.

Shpakovsky Yu. G., Potapchuk I. V. Decrees on the

court No. 1, 2, 3. // “Bulletin of the University named

after O.E. Kutafina (MSAL)". No. 4.2018.

9.

Vereshagina A.V. Decree No. 1 on the court: history

of preparation and its content. // Journal of Russian

Law No. 6. 2011.

10.

Babenko V.N. Problems of the formation of the

Soviet justice system (1917

1920).// Russia and the

modern world. No. 3. 2017.

References

Kozlov V. A. History of the Fatherland: people, ideas, solutions. Essays on the history of the Soviet state. – Moscow., 1991. – 366 p.

Turkestan at the beginning of the 20th century: On the history of the origins of national independence // Team of authors: R. M. Abdullaev, S. S. Agzamkhodzhaev, I. A. Alimov and others/.— T.: “Sharq”, 2000,— 672 p.

Murashevsky S.D. Materials on the history of the October Revolution in Turkestan. - Tashkent, 1922. – 47 p.

History of Russia from 1917 to 1945: Textbook. Benefit. – Ivanovo, 2009. – 200 p.

The Great Russian Revolution of 1917 in the destinies of countries and peoples of the world. Sat. scientific Art. edited by L.I. Galliamova. Vladivostok: INAE FEB RAS, 2018. 410 p.

Tashliev Sh. Establishment and strengthening of Soviet power in Turkestan. – Ashgabat: Turkmengosizdat. 1957. – 145 p.

Decrees of the Soviet government. T.I. M., State Political Publishing House. literature, 1957.

Shpakovsky Yu. G., Potapchuk I. V. Decrees on the court No. 1, 2, 3. // “Bulletin of the University named after O.E. Kutafina (MSAL)". No. 4.2018.

Vereshagina A.V. Decree No. 1 on the court: history of preparation and its content. // Journal of Russian Law No. 6. 2011.

Babenko V.N. Problems of the formation of the Soviet justice system (1917–1920).// Russia and the modern world. No. 3. 2017.