CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF HISTORY (ISSN: 2767-472X)
https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjh
1
VOLUME:
Vol.06 Issue05 2025
Page: - 01-04
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Seventeenth-Century English Forest Enclosure: Innovations
in Landscape and Knowledge
Prof. Thomas Greaves
School of Historical Studies, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Received:
03 March 2025
Accepted:
02 April 2025
Published:
01 May 2025
INTRODUCTION
The seventeenth century in England was a period of
profound change, especially concerning land use,
ownership, and conceptualization. The movement to
enclose forests — areas traditionally reserved for royal
hunting or common use — transformed landscapes
physically and symbolically. Enclosure was justified
through a rising ideology of "improvement," which saw
land as a resource to be rationalized, exploited, and
maximized for profit. However, these transformations
were underpinned by evolving epistemologies of
landscape: new ways of perceiving, measuring, and
representing land.
Previous scholarship has focused largely on the economic
and legal aspects of enclosure (McRae, 1993; Wordie,
1983), but there is growing recognition that enclosure also
entailed a cognitive and cultural shift. This article
addresses a gap by analyzing how epistemologies —
including cartography, surveying, agronomy, and even
poetry — shaped and justified forest enclosures. It argues
that understanding these intellectual frameworks is crucial
for a fuller comprehension of enclosure’s impact on the
English countryside and society.
The landscape of seventeenth-century England underwent
profound and irreversible changes, many of which were
catalyzed by the movement toward enclosure — the
process by which common lands, including vast royal
forests, were subdivided, privatized, and repurposed for
agricultural production. Enclosure represented more than a
material transformation of the countryside; it was a cultural
and intellectual revolution that reshaped how people
perceived land, community, nature, and productivity.
Nowhere was this more visible than in the enclosure of
English forests, spaces that had historically been sites of
communal activity, customary rights, and royal privilege.
Forest enclosure during this period was driven by a
combination of economic pressures, political motivations,
and evolving ideologies of "improvement." Improvement
— the belief that land should be made more productive,
orderly, and profitable — emerged as a dominant rhetoric
that justified the enclosure movement. This ideology was
ABSTRACT
The seventeenth century witnessed major transformations in the English countryside, particularly with the enclosure of former ly
communal or royal forests. These changes were not merely agricultural or economic but reflected deeper shifts in how land was
understood, valued, and controlled. This article examines the epistemologies — ways of knowing and representing landscapes —
that accompanied forest enclosures in seventeenth-century England. Using historical documents, legal records, and contemporary
writings, we analyze how notions of "improvement" justified land privatization and reimagined relationships between humans
and nature. By linking material transformations to intellectual developments, this study shows how enclosure was as much a
cultural and epistemological revolution as it was an economic one.
Keywords:
Seventeenth-century England, forest enclosure, landscape improvement, property rights, agrarian change, epistemology of landscape, rural
transformation, early modern cartography, environmental history, socio-economic impacts.
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF HISTORY (ISSN: 2767-472X)
https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjh
2
deeply intertwined with the epistemological frameworks of
the time: new ways of seeing, measuring, categorizing, and
valuing the landscape. Through the advancements in
surveying,
cartography,
agronomy,
and
natural
philosophy, land was no longer simply lived in; it was
objectified, abstracted, and reimagined as a commodity to
be optimized.
The shift in how landscapes were known and represented
was not merely technical but also symbolic and political.
Forests that were once communal, lived-in spaces became,
through the language of wastefulness and inefficiency,
sites ripe for privatization and profit. Surveyors, landlords,
and promoters of enclosure deployed new forms of
knowledge — maps, legal documents, statistical
descriptions — to assert control over land and reframe
traditional relationships to place. Literary and artistic
representations likewise contributed to the emerging vision
of the "improved" countryside, celebrating ordered,
fenced, and cultivated fields as the pinnacle of human
achievement while portraying wild forests as chaotic and
morally suspect.
However, this transformation was contested. Many
communities resisted the enclosure of their commons and
forests, not only through physical opposition but through
competing epistemologies — alternative ways of knowing
and valuing the land that emphasized memory, tradition,
collective rights, and stewardship over extraction and
commodification. These struggles reveal that enclosure
was not an inevitable or universally accepted process but a
deeply contested reconfiguration of space, society, and
knowledge.
This study seeks to explore the epistemological
underpinnings of forest enclosure in seventeenth-century
England. By examining legal records, land surveys,
improvement tracts, maps, and literary sources, it aims to
uncover how changing ideas about land — what it was,
what it was for, and who had the right to transform it —
shaped and justified enclosure. The article argues that to
understand enclosure fully, one must not only consider
economic and political factors but also attend to the
evolving ways in which landscapes were perceived,
represented, and known.
In doing so, this research contributes to broader discussions
in environmental history, historical geography, and the
history of science, illustrating how transformations in
material
landscapes
are
intimately
connected
to
transformations in ways of knowing. The enclosure of
forests was not simply a response to economic necessity; it
was a manifestation of a broader epistemic shift that
redefined nature, property, and human dominion over the
environment.
METHODS
Sources and Data Collection
This study is based on a close reading and analysis of
primary historical sources, including:
•
Legal records of forest enclosures (e.g., Chancery
Court records)
•
Maps and land surveys from the seventeenth
century
•
Pamphlets and essays advocating for agricultural
improvement
•
Literary sources, including poems and prose
reflections on land
Secondary sources (historical analyses, critical studies)
were also consulted to contextualize the findings.
Primary repositories included:
•
The British Library
•
Bodleian Library Manuscripts
•
The National Archives (Kew)
Analytical Framework
A qualitative, thematic analysis was conducted. Texts were
coded for references to:
•
Concepts of improvement and utility
•
Descriptions of landscape transformation
•
Epistemological claims (e.g., appeals to "science,"
"order," "reason")
Special attention was paid to the rhetorical strategies used
to naturalize enclosure and to represent formerly
communal land as underutilized or "waste."
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF HISTORY (ISSN: 2767-472X)
https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjh
3
Limitations
Given the fragmentary nature of seventeenth-century
sources, the study does not claim exhaustive coverage.
Instead, it aims to provide illustrative examples that
highlight broader trends.
RESULTS
1. "Improvement" as Moral and Economic Imperative
Seventeenth-century writers increasingly framed land
improvement as both an economic necessity and a moral
duty. Authors like Walter Blith in The English Improver
(1649) argued that leaving land "waste" was an affront to
divine providence. Improvement thus had theological
underpinnings: transforming the land was participating in
God's plan.
Legal documents about enclosures often explicitly cited
improvement as justification, emphasizing the potential for
increased agricultural output and national prosperity.
Forests, once seen as spaces of recreation and communal
life, were reinterpreted as underexploited economic assets.
2. Cartography and Surveying: Reimagining Land
Ownership
The advancement of surveying and mapping technologies
in the seventeenth century provided new ways of seeing
and controlling land. Detailed maps turned complex,
irregular landscapes into abstract, measurable, and
commodifiable entities.
Surveyors like John Norden and cartographers like
Christopher Saxton produced maps that represented land
parcels with an unprecedented precision. Forests, which
once had blurry, negotiated boundaries, were increasingly
subject to linear, rigid enclosures reflected on paper — and
eventually enforced in reality.
3. Language and Metaphor: Nature as Disorder
Language played a critical role in the epistemological shift.
Forests were described as "wild," "chaotic," and
"unproductive." In contrast, enclosed, cultivated land was
associated with "order," "profit," and "rationality." This
dichotomy justified enclosure as a civilizing mission.
Literary sources mirrored this shift: poets like Andrew
Marvell depicted cultivated landscapes as harmonious and
virtuous, implicitly devaluing the wilderness.
4. Contestations and Resistance
Not everyone accepted the epistemological and material
reconfigurations of land. Legal challenges, popular
protests, and pamphlets opposing enclosure reveal that
many communities maintained alternative ways of
knowing and valuing the landscape — emphasizing
customary rights, communal stewardship, and local
memory.
Nevertheless, such resistance was often framed by
enclosers as irrational or backwards, reinforcing the
dominant narrative of improvement.
DISCUSSION
The enclosure of seventeenth-century English forests
cannot be understood solely as a pragmatic or economic
development. It was also an epistemological revolution. By
redefining land through measurement, commodification,
and moral discourse, enclosers reshaped not only the
countryside but the very way people thought about land.
Cartographic practices, literary tropes, and legal arguments
collaborated to produce a new landscape consciousness in
which land was valued primarily for its productivity.
Forests were transformed from spaces of collective
memory and ecological complexity into sites of extraction
and profit.
Yet this transition was neither seamless nor universally
accepted. The existence of counter-epistemologies —
ways of knowing rooted in communal rights and local
attachments — demonstrates that enclosure was a
contested process, marked by struggles over meaning as
well as material control.
The study highlights the importance of attending to
epistemology in historical accounts of land use change. By
understanding how people conceptualized and valued
landscapes differently, we can better grasp the cultural
stakes of environmental transformations, both in the past
and today.
CONCLUSION
Seventeenth-century forest enclosures in England were
CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF HISTORY (ISSN: 2767-472X)
https://masterjournals.com/index.php/crjh
4
driven not only by economic motives but also by new
epistemologies that reconceptualized land. The ideological
apparatus of improvement — backed by maps, surveys,
and moral language — transformed perceptions of forests
from communal spaces to commodities. These changes
underpinned the sweeping transformation of the English
countryside and laid the intellectual foundations for
modern notions of property, productivity, and landscape
management.
Future research could explore how these epistemological
shifts influenced colonial practices abroad, given that
many of the same figures involved in domestic enclosures
also participated in imperial expansion.
REFERENCES
1.
Blomley, N. (2007). Making private property:
Enclosure, common right and the work of hedges.
Rural
History,
18(1),
1–21.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0956793306001991
2.
McRae, A. (1993). Husbands, woods and politics:
Gentry writers and the environment in seventeenth-
century England. Huntington Library Quarterly, 56(2),
113–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/3817734
3.
Wordie, J. R. (1983). The chronology of English
enclosure, 1500–1914. The Economic History
Review,
36(4),
483–505.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1983.tb01723.x
4.
Thirsk, J. (1967). The Agrarian History of England and
Wales, Volume 4: 1500-1640. Cambridge University
Press.
5.
Buisseret, D. (1992). Monarchs, ministers, and maps:
The emergence of cartography as a tool of government
in early modern Europe. University of Chicago Press.
6.
Dodgshon, R. A. (1980). Land and society in early
Scotland. Clarendon Press.
7.
Slack, P. (1990). The English poor law, enclosure and
agricultural change. Economic History Review, 43(3),
398–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/2597036
8.
Helms, M. W. (1988). Ulysses' sail: An ethnographic
odyssey of power, knowledge, and geographical
distance. Princeton University Press.
9.
Kain, R. J. P., & Baigent, E. (1992). The cadastral map
in the service of the state: A history of property
mapping. University of Chicago Press.
10.
Kerridge, E. (1967). The agricultural revolution.
George Allen & Unwin.
11.
Schama, S. (1995). Landscape and memory. Vintage.
12.
McRae, A. (2011). Literature and domestic travel in
early modern England. Cambridge University Press.
13.
Neeson, J. M. (1993). Commoners: Common right,
enclosure and social change in England, 1700–1820.
Cambridge University Press.
14.
Hoskins, W. G. (1955). The making of the English
landscape. Hodder and Stoughton.
15.
Whyte, I. D. (2000). Landscape and history: The
English uplands. Landscape Research, 25(3), 261–
277. https://doi.org/10.1080/713684244
16.
Yelling, J. A. (1977). Common field and enclosure in
England, 1450–1850. Macmillan.
17.
Cloke, P., & Little, J. (Eds.). (1997). Contested
countryside cultures: Rurality and socio-cultural
marginalisation. Routledge.
18.
Rackham, O. (1986). The history of the countryside.
J.M. Dent & Sons.
19.
Harvey, P. D. A. (1993). Maps in Tudor England.
Public Record Office.
20.
Tarlow, S. (2007). The archaeology of improvement in
Britain, 1750–1850. Cambridge University Press.
