This state provides information about the importance of context in naming grammatical forms, representative tenses, and corpus of the Uzbek language. In particular, cases of modern expressions that deviate from the general meaning of temporary forms under the influence of the context are analyzed. The article analyzes the use of present tense forms in past and future tenses, as well as future tense forms in past and present tenses based on examples. Reasons for inconsistencies in form and meaning are discussed.
Abdullajonova J. Stylistic features of verb tenses. Tashkent: Science, 1993. - 100 p.
Comrie B. Tense. – Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1985. – P. 139.
Karaulov Yu. Linguistic time and linguistic space (on the concept of chronoglasses)//Bulletin of Moscow University. Philology. - 1970. - No. 1. - p. 32-36.
Ghulamov A. Verb. -Tashkent: Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences, 1954. - 92 p.
Sulaymanov A., Hojiev A., Jo'raeva J. Verb tenses. Tashkent: 1962. –P. 168.
Hojiev A. Verb. Tashkent: Science, 1973. –P. 190.
Zikrillaev G'. Spirit and language. Tashkent: Science, 2018. –P. 464.
Khamroeva Sh. Linguistic support of the morphological analyzer of the Uzbek language: Philology. science. doc. ...dis. - Tashkent, 2021. –P. 268.
Vinogradov V. Russian language. - Moscow, 1947. - P. 451.
Sodikova M. Stylistics of the verb. - Tashkent: Science, 1975. –P. 106.
www.uzschoolcorpora.uz
www.daryo.uz
www.kun.uz
www.marifat.uz
www.xs.uz