Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
42
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
42-52
OCLC
–
1368736135
A
BSTRACT
This article examines the late Qing period as a pivotal phase in Chinese literary history, bridging classical
traditions and modern literary innovations. It explores the poetic revolution's role in transforming themes,
language, and stylistic elements, alongside debates on its relationship with modern new poetry.
Highlighting the socio-political and cultural context, the study argues for recognizing late Qing literature
as an independent field, crucial for understanding the transition from classical to modern Chinese
literature. This period’s literary evolution reflects the dynamic interplay between traditional values and
external influences, contributing significantly to the trajectory of Chinese literary heritage.
K
EYWORDS
Qing literature, poetic revolution, Chinese literary history, modern new poetry, classical traditions, cultural
transformation, socio-political context, literary innovation, transitional phase, China.
I
NTRODUCTION
During the late Qing Dynasty, Chinese society
underwent significant transformations, which
deeply influenced the literary landscape of the
period. This era witnessed a revolutionary shift in
poetry, marked not only by substantial
modifications to traditional poetic forms but also
by a profound reevaluation of poetic themes and
ideas. Despite numerous studies conducted in
recent years on the poetic revolution of the late
Qing period, considerable debate and research
Journal
Website:
http://sciencebring.co
m/index.php/ijasr
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Research Article
ANALYSIS OF CHINESE SCHOLARS' RESEARCH ON THE
EVOLUTION OF NEW POETRY
Submission Date:
November 11,
2024,
Accepted Date:
November 16, 2024,
Published Date:
November 28, 2024
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ijasr-04-11-08
Ozodjon Ochilov Mardievich
PhD, Associate Professor Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies, "Sinology" Higher School,
Uzbekistan
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
43
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
42-52
OCLC
–
1368736135
gaps remain concerning its overall significance,
place in literary history, and its relationship with
modern new poetry. In particular, the issue of
clarifying the connection between the Poetic
Revolution and modern new poetry necessitates
a detailed examination of the internal changes
and transformations within poetry itself. Through
such in-depth analysis, it is possible to draw
reliable conclusions about the evolution of poetic
features during this transformative period.
Most studies on the poetic revolution of the late
Qing period concentrate on the developments of
the early 20th century. Initial research primarily
examined the historical background and
prominent figures of the poetic revolution, such
as Liang Qichao and Huang Zongxiang. Over time,
as research perspectives and methodologies
expanded and deepened, scholars began to focus
more on the transformations within poetic forms
and content brought about by the revolution. For
instance, researchers like Guo Shaoyu and Qian
Zhongshu highlighted the innovations
introduced in poetic language, themes, and
stylistic expressions during this period. Their
studies shed light on how these changes
redefined the essence of poetry, emphasizing the
revolutionary shift not only in the structure but
also in the aesthetics and conceptual
underpinnings of poetry in the late Qing era.
Within academic circles, there are two
predominant
viewpoints
regarding
the
relationship between the poetic revolution of the
late Qing period and modern new poetry:
1.
Direct Influence Perspective According to
the first perspective, the poetic revolution
directly influenced the emergence of modern new
poetry and laid the foundation for its
development. Proponents of this view argue that
the linguistic and structural transformations
initiated during the poetic revolution in the late
Qing era served as a solid groundwork for the
evolution of modern new poetry. They emphasize
that the innovations in poetic language and form
during this period were integral to the creation of
the new poetic tradition.
2.
Western Influence Perspective The second
perspective posits that there is no direct lineage
between the poetic revolution and modern new
poetry. Instead, it suggests that modern new
poetry was shaped primarily by the ideas and
techniques borrowed from Western poetry.
According to this view, modern new poetry owes
more to the influence of Western literary
practices than to the changes introduced during
the late Qing poetic revolution.
Both perspectives are supported by distinct sets
of evidence and scholarly research, highlighting
the varied factors that contributed to the
development of modern new poetry. The
question of how much the poetic revolution
influenced modern new poetry remains a central
topic of academic debate and discussion,
reflecting broader inquiries into the interplay
between traditional and external influences in
shaping modern Chinese literature.
The position of late Qing literature, and modern
literature as a whole, within the history of
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
44
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
42-52
OCLC
–
1368736135
Chinese literature is indeed somewhat uneasy.
This period is often regarded as the conclusion of
ancient literature rather than an independent
literary stage. Such an approach is evident in
numerous historical works on ancient literature.
For instance, the four-volume History of Chinese
Literature , edited by You Guoen and others,
considers the literature of this era as merely the
endpoint of the separation process from the
source of ancient literature, rather than elevating
it to the level of an independent literary phase.
Similarly, in The History of Ancient Chinese
Literature edited by Guo Yuheng, modern
literature is mentioned as a stage of Qing dynasty
literature. However, in practice, the analysis of
Qing dynasty literature in this work largely
ignores the modern literary elements of the
period, leaving this section unexplored.This
treatment underscores the broader challenge of
situating late Qing literature in a framework that
recognizes its unique contributions, as opposed
to viewing it solely as a transitional phase
between ancient and modern literary traditions.
Conversely, works on the history of modern
literature often begin around the New Culture
Movement of 1917. This chronological approach
disrupts the perceived continuity with ancient
literature, making it difficult to establish a
connection or sense of progression. As a result,
modern literature is frequently treated as a
distinct "other realm," disconnected from ancient
traditions. This has led to a widespread
misconception among readers that modern
literature emerged in opposition to or as a
complete break from ancient literature. However,
the development of modern literature as an
independent field addresses this gap by serving
as a bridge between the histories of ancient and
contemporary literature. It not only incorporates
the previously overlooked transitional period of
modern literature into the scope of literary
research but also legitimizes its existence as a
standalone discipline. By filling this void, modern
literature provides a more comprehensive
framework for understanding the evolution of
Chinese literary traditions, emphasizing the
nuanced connections between the ancient and the
contemporary.
In the preface to The Developmental History of
Modern Chinese Literature, Guo Yuanli
emphasizes the transitional and foundational role
of late Qing literature within the broader history
of Chinese literary evolution. He states:"Modern
Chinese literature is both the culmination of
ancient literature and the cornerstone of modern
literature, emdiving an intrinsic continuity. It
represents a critical phase in the history of
Chinese literary development, shaped by 80 years
of creative efforts under the impact of
international cultural shocks and national
tragedies. Although this evolving literature has
yet to gain recognition as mature and has not left
behind major works in the history of Chinese
literature, the transformations and complex
literary phenomena of that era hold great
research value. The successes and failures in its
developmental path deserve careful analysis by
literary historians."
Guo also highlights the scarcity of comprehensive
studies dedicated to this period, which points to
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
45
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
42-52
OCLC
–
1368736135
two crucial aspects: the underexplored
significance of modern Chinese literature and the
broader gaps in research on this transitional
phase. This lack of scholarly attention, he argues,
should be viewed as an opportunity for future
research, opening new avenues for exploration
that can yield valuable insights:
1.
Evolutionary Features in Content and
Form. Late Qing literature demonstrates
distinct evolutionary traits, blending
ancient literary traditions with trends
indicative of the transition to modern
literature. Ignoring this period risks
obscuring the understanding of the pivotal
transition from traditional to modern
Chinese literature.
2.
Reflections of Societal Transformation.
The literature of the late Qing period
mirrors the significant societal changes of
the time, serving as a cultural lens for
understanding the era’s social ideologies
and transformations.
3.
A Bridge Between Ancient and Modern
Literature. The emergence of modern
literature as an independent discipline not
only fills the perceived gap between
ancient and modern literature but also
fosters deeper literary research and
intellectual progress. This process reflects
the
dynamic
reorganization
and
interdisciplinary expansion within literary
studies.
4.
Future Directions for Research. Guo sees
the existing gaps in research on late Qing
literature as fertile ground for scholarly
innovation. He suggests that addressing
these gaps can lead to meaningful
discoveries, enriching our understanding
of the era and its role in the literary
evolution of China. The study of late Qing
literature, therefore, should be prioritized
as a developmental direction in literary
scholarship. Guo’s insights underline the
critical importance of late Qing literature
as a phase that encapsulates both the
heritage of ancient literature and the seeds
of modern innovation. By acknowledging
its unique position, scholars can better
comprehend the trajectory of Chinese
literature, fostering a more nuanced
understanding of its historical and cultural
underpinnings.
Overall, the literature of the late Qing period, and
modern historical literature in particular, should
not be overlooked in the study of Chinese literary
history. These works serve not only as a crucial
transitional stage between ancient and modern
literature but also as a key to understanding the
overarching trajectory of Chinese literary
development. In-depth exploration of this period
allows for a better comprehension of the
historical progression of Chinese literature and
its internal logic. Such research addresses
existing gaps in contemporary academic studies
and offers new perspectives and methodologies
for advancing the study of Chinese literary
history. By recognizing the significance of late
Qing literature, scholars can gain a more holistic
understanding of how Chinese literature evolved
over centuries, providing insights into its
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
46
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
42-52
OCLC
–
1368736135
transformation and the broader cultural and
societal shifts it reflects. This focus not only
enriches the field but also ensures a more
comprehensive narrative of Chinese literary
development.
Shortly after the New Culture Movement, several
works on literary history emerged that
demonstrated a strong interest in modern
historical literature. In February 1923, Shen Bao
published Hu Shi's article The Past Fifty Years
(later retitled The Last Fifty Years of Chinese
Literature), which analyzed the general trends in
literature after 1872. This article, however,
reveals Hu Shi's subjective perspective, as he
aimed to promote baihua (vernacular) literature
and the literary revolution. Consequently, he
placed greater emphasis on the historical
significance of the literary changes after 1917,
while characterizing pre-1917 literature as
merely the "final mature creative stage" of
classical literature. Despite this subjectivity, Hu
Shi’s framing of the New Culture Movement
within the context of "modern historical
literature" underscores the intrinsic connection
between the two. This perspective is crucial for
validating their mutual interrelation and lays the
groundwork for significant future research. By
situating the New Culture Movement as part of
the broader narrative of modern historical
literature, scholars can better understand the
transformative processes that shaped Chinese
literary evolution and identify the period’s lasting
influence on modern literary practices.
Several years after Hu Shi's work, Chen Zizhan’s
The Evolution of Modern Chinese Literature: A
History of Chinese Literature Over the Past Thirty
Years was published . Unlike Hu Shi, Chen Zizhan
offered independent perspectives, emphasizing
the unique significance of modern historical
literature. According to Chen, "This period is one
of the most crucial in the history of Chinese
literature. It reflects significant changes in all
aspects of literature, marking a stark contrast
with earlier eras." Chen argued that the primary
purpose and essence of literature transformed
during this period. He concluded that post-1894
literature began to reflect the demand for a new
kind of literature tailored to the needs of modern
individuals. This literature distinguished itself
with its modern characteristics, diverging from
traditional literature to address the experiences
and needs of contemporary life. Chen Zizhan
identified several distinctive modern attributes in
post-1894 Chinese literature: literature from this
period incorporated fresh perspectives and
reflected the intellectual currents of the modern
age; the thematic scope of literature expanded to
include topics relevant to contemporary society,
such as social change, individual identity, and
national crises; literary works from this era
employed novel stylistic techniques that set them
apart from traditional forms.
Chen Zizhan highlighted the intrinsic connection
between post-1894 literature and modern
Chinese literature. He demonstrated how this
period laid the groundwork for the emergence of
modern
literary
forms
by
introducing
innovations in both content and style. According
to Chen, post-1894 literature was not only
modern in its essence but also pivotal in shaping
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
47
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
42-52
OCLC
–
1368736135
the trajectory of modern Chinese literature. Chen
Zizhan’s
conclusions
underscore
the
transformative role of post-1894 literature as a
critical stage in the development of modern
Chinese literature. His work vividly illustrates
how this period bridged the gap between
traditional and modern literature, providing a
foundation for the literary innovations that
followed.
By
emphasizing
the
modern
characteristics of this transitional phase, Chen’s
research highlights the interconnectedness of late
Qing literature and the broader evolution of
modern Chinese literature.
In his History of Modern Chinese Literature , Qian
Jibo included leaders of the poetic revolution,
such as Kang Youwei and Liang Qichao, under the
category
of
"new
literature,"
drawing
comparisons between their contributions and
those of Hu Shi. By doing so, he highlighted the
critical role these figures played in renewing
poetry, a process that significantly influenced the
development of modern Chinese poetry. Zhu
Ziqing, in his Chinese New Literature Series:
Introduction to Poetry , explicitly illustrated the
continuity between the poetic revolution and
modern new poetry. He observed: "Their 'new
poetry' primarily consisted of using new
terminology. They sought to renew the language
of poetry by introducing new words and terms.
Only Huang Zunxian advanced further along this
path, not merely employing new words but also
advocating for poetry written in plain language
('my hand writes my mouth'). He emphasized the
importance of writing poetry in the vernacular,
promoting the incorporation of new ideas and
new materials into poetry, such as 'things and
regions unknown to the ancients.' Through this,
he aimed to introduce new themes and fresh
concepts into poetry. Although the poetic
revolution was ultimately unsuccessful, it had a
profound ideological influence on the new poetry
movement of 1917, inspiring and significantly
shaping its development." These observations
indicate that the poetic revolution of the late 19th
and early 20th centuries had a significant impact
on the formation of modern Chinese poetry.
Innovative approaches and new ideas introduced
by leaders like Huang Zunxian contributed to the
development of poetry during this period. The
new language and themes they introduced served
as the ideological foundation for the new poetry
movement of 1917.
Through these early literary history studies, we
can see that modern historical literature is not
only a crucial transitional stage between ancient
and modern literature but also holds significant
importance in understanding the overall
developmental trajectory of Chinese literature.
These studies provide us with rich historical
information
and
theoretical
foundations,
enabling a deeper understanding of the process of
Chinese literature's transition from tradition to
modernity.
In the 1980s, significant changes took place in the
study of Chinese literature. As a result, modern
historical literature (1840
–
1917) was suddenly
transformed from a "neglected swan" into a
"swan," becoming the focus of scholarly attention.
In other words, the literature of this period
emerged from obscurity to become a vibrant topic
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
48
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
42-52
OCLC
–
1368736135
of discussion in academic circles, playing a
particularly important role in modern literary
studies. In the 1980s, social, political, and cultural
changes in China, the emergence of new literary
theories, a desire to restore historical justice, the
need to understand the roots of modern
literature,
and
increased
international
collaboration led to a significant surge in the
study of modern historical literature. Scholars
and researchers began to pay closer attention to
this period because of its critical role in the
formation and development of modern Chinese
literature. As part of the process of rewriting the
history of modern literature, the relationship
between modern historical literature and modern
literature was reevaluated, with their mutual
influences explored in greater depth. Modern
historical literature was confirmed as the
foundation for the development of modern
literature, highlighting their interconnection and
reciprocal impact. Many specialists and scholars
undertook studies to reassess modern historical
literature and determine its influence on modern
literature. What had previously been overlooked
in earlier research became a vibrant topic of
discussion and investigation. As a result of these
studies, modern historical literature was
identified as a vital source and basis for modern
literature, cementing its significance in Chinese
literary history.
Researchers such as Chen Pingyuan, Liu Na, Wang
Dewei, Qian Zhenggang, and Yang Lianfeng have
conducted extensive studies on this topic. These
scholars have approached late Qing literature
from the perspective of modern literature,
focusing on identifying its modern characteristics
and analyzing its influence on the development of
modern literature. The outcomes of their
research can be summarized as follows:
1.
Discovery of Modernity in Late Qing
Literature.These experts emphasized uncovering
the modernity embedded in late Qing literature
and its significance as a transitional phase leading
to modern literature. They explored how the new
ideas, themes, and expressive techniques of this
period were interconnected with modern literary
developments.
2.
Foundational Contributions to Literary
Studies.Their research provided essential
resources and comparative frameworks for
current and future studies of modern literature
and literary history. By examining late Qing
literature in this context, they created a
foundation for understanding the evolution of
Chinese literature.
3.
Enhanced Understanding of Modern
Literary Development. These studies have
enabled scholars to gain deeper insights into the
processes of modern literary development,
offering a clearer view of the transition from
traditional to modern literary forms and themes.
By establishing these connections, these
researchers have not only illuminated the critical
role of late Qing literature in shaping modern
Chinese literature but also enriched the
theoretical and methodological tools available for
the study of literary history.
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
49
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
42-52
OCLC
–
1368736135
However, a general evaluation of these scholars'
findings reveals a predominant focus on late Qing
novels. For instance, Chen Pingyuan’s The
Transformation of the Narrative Model in Chinese
Novels provides a detailed account of the
transition and characteristics of late Qing
novelistic modernity. This work is particularly
significant for understanding the development of
modern Chinese fiction. Similarly, Wang
Dewei’s
Fin-de-Siècle Splendor: Repressed Modernities of
Late Qing Fiction concentrates on the genre of
novels, contributing significantly to the study of
modernity through the lens of late Qing fiction.
Qian Zhenggang’s A Historical Overview of Late
Qing and Early Republican Novels also focuses on
this subject, analyzing the transition of late Qing
fiction
toward
modernity.
Liu
Na’s
Transformations: Chinese Literature from the
Xinhai Revolution to the May Fourth Movement
offers a broad investigation into the transition to
modern literature, but devotes little attention to
poetry. Likewise, Yang Lianfeng’s From the Late
Qing to the May Fourth Movement: The
Modernization of Chinese Literature provides an
extensive analysis of the transition to modern
literature, yet largely neglects poetry. This
noticeable emphasis on late Qing novels and
relative disregard for poetry is evident. While this
could be attributed to the researchers' personal
academic interests, it also reflects an
underappreciation of the unique features of
poetry. Nonetheless, this oversight creates
substantial opportunities for rediscovering and
redefining the modernity embedded in late Qing
poetry. Moreover, the theoretical perspectives,
methodologies, and outcomes derived from the
study of late Qing novels can serve as valuable
comparative foundations for exploring the
distinctive characteristics of poetry. By applying
similar approaches, scholars could uncover new
insights into the poetic innovations and
modernity of the late Qing era.
Naturally, research on late Qing poetry,
particularly on the poetic revolution, is not
entirely absent. However, scholars have tended to
focus more on the period itself, often neglecting
its connections to modern literature. This
oversight has hindered a deeper exploration of
the modernity-related aspects of the poetic
revolution. For instance, the articles in Zhang
Yongfang’s collection The Poetic Revolution and
Literary Changes primarily examine the roles and
contributions of individuals involved in the poetic
revolution. However, these studies place less
emphasis on the revolution’s subsequent
influence on modern poetry. Similarly, Guo
Yuanli’s The Developmental History of Modern
Chinese Literature provides detailed information
on the development of mid-modern poetry,
highlighting major writers, works, movements,
and ideas. Likewise, Li Jikai’s History of Mid
-
Modern Chinese Poetry follows a similar
trajectory. Although these works occasionally
underscore the impact of the poetic revolution on
modern poetry, their analyses often remain broad
and lack the depth needed to investigate the
internal elements of the poetry itself. This
generality limits the potential to fully understand
how late Qing poetry influenced the emergence of
modern Chinese poetry.
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
50
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
42-52
OCLC
–
1368736135
In recent years, the relationship between late
Qing poetry and modern new poetry has
undergone a reevaluation. Wang Guangming, in
the first chapter of his book A Century of
Evolution in Modern Chinese Poetry , focuses on
the "poetic revolution," considering it the starting
point of "a century of Chinese poetry." This new
approach demonstrates that the author
acknowledges the significance of the poetic
revolution in the development of modern poetry
and seeks to explore its influence in greater
depth. However, W
ang’s assessment of the poetic
revolution’s place in literary history reveals
certain gaps and contradictions. Specifically, the
author acknowledges that late Qing poetry was
instrumental in the emergence of the "new
poetry" concept, which later became a key
reference for modern Chinese poets in their
search for modernity. He also identifies the poetic
revolution as the first step in shaping modern
poetic forms in China. At the same time, however,
he emphasizes that the language of this poetry
remained traditional, describing it as akin to
"pouring new wine into an old bottle." Thus, he
denies that the roots of new poetry can be traced
back to this period. Wang's perspective on the
poetic revolution is complex and contradictory.
On the one hand, he recognizes its importance in
the development of modern new poetry; on the
other hand, he critiques its linguistic
traditionalism and questions its foundational role
in the evolution of modern poetry. While he views
the poetic revolution as the beginning of modern
p
oetry’s development, he simultaneously denies
it the status of being its true origin.
Rong Guangqin's doctoral dissertation, The
Emergence of Modern Chinese Poetry: From the
Late Qing to the May Fourth Movement , and Lai
Yuhang's dissertation, The Language of Poetry
from the Late Qing to the May Fourth Period ,
stand out for their unique perspectives,
theoretical approaches, and depth of analysis.
Rong Guangqin focuses on the interaction
between poetic language, form, and personal
experiences within the context of modernity,
employing theoretical analyses of poetic text,
language, and structure. Lai Yuhang, on the other
hand, examines the process of creating a new
poetic language, emphasizing shifts in form, the
influence of experimentation, the expression of
emotions, new poetic arts, and the interplay
between modernity and classical traditions.
Although both dissertations start with the poetic
revolution, they dedicate relatively little attention
to it. Their primary focus is on analyzing poetic
language, leaving the relationship between the
poetic revolution and the origin, development,
and transformation of modern Chinese poetry
insufficiently explored. This oversight limits a
comprehensive understanding of the significance
of the poetic revolution in the evolution of
modern poetry. The authors acknowledge that
their discussions on the formation of modern
poetic forms are largely limited to changes in
language and artistic principles. However, they
concede that these discussions are inadequate to
fully explain how modern poetic forms emerged.
They also emphasize that the topic of "the origins
of modern Chinese poetry" remains unresolved
and that their works serve only as an
"introduction" or "guide" to the subject. Clearly,
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
51
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
42-52
OCLC
–
1368736135
the effort to pinpoint how modern poetic forms
developed has yet to be fully addressed. This area
demands more in-depth and expansive research.
As such, it remains an important and necessary
direction for future studies in Chinese literary
scholarship.
Indeed, there are significant studies on the
general literary activities of leaders of the poetic
revolution, such as Liang Qichao and Huang
Zunxian. Examples include Xia Xiaohong's
Awakening the World, Delivering the Future:
Liang Qichao’s Literary Path , Liang Yantang's
Liang Qichao and the Literary Revolution of the
Late Qing Dynasty , and Liu Bingbing's doctoral
dissertation, Between Classicism and Modernity:
A Study of Huang Zunxian’s Poetry. While these
works provide valuable insights into the overall
literary contributions of figures like Liang Qichao
and Huang Zunxian, the poetic revolution itself is
not a central theme in these studies. As a result, a
more comprehensive and detailed analysis of the
poetic revolution remains lacking, leaving
significant room for further exploration of its
nuances and broader implications.
It is worth noting that Yang Zhanjun’s doctoral
dissertation, Oscillating Between Radicalism and
Conservatism: A Study of the Poetic Revolution ,
is one of the few works dedicated to exploring the
evolution of poetry. The dissertation draws the
following conclusions: the poetic revolution is not
a bridge between traditional poetry and modern
poetry, nor is modern vernacular baihua poetry a
continuation or development of the poetic
revolution. There is no natural transition or
evolutionary relationship between the two.
Instead, the "May Fourth" baihua new poetry
emerged and developed independently of the
poetic revolution. According to Yang, the poetic
revolution belongs to the realm of traditional
poetry and represents its culmination. However,
the dissertation fails to convincingly demonstrate
the differences between the poetic revolution and
modern new poetry with solid evidence or logical
explanations.
It
provides
only
general
information about the background of the poetic
revolution, the works of several key participants,
and the relationships between the poetic
revolution and other schools and directions of
poetry. Furthermore, it does not fully
substantiate the traditional essence and
"classical" characteristics of the poetic revolution,
leaving room for further in-depth analysis and
investigation.
C
ONCLUSION
The study of late Qing literature highlights its
significant role as a transitional phase bridging
the divide between classical and modern Chinese
literary traditions. This period, marked by socio-
political upheavals and cultural transformations,
serves as both the culmination of traditional
literary forms and the foundation for modern
innovations in Chinese poetry and prose.
Through the analysis of late Qing literature, it
becomes evident that this era reflects the
interplay of indigenous cultural values and
external influences, leading to a reimagining of
themes, styles, and language. While often
marginalized in historical studies, recognizing the
Volume 04 Issue 11-2024
52
International Journal of Advance Scientific Research
(ISSN
–
2750-1396)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
11
Pages:
42-52
OCLC
–
1368736135
late Qing period as an independent literary phase
not only enriches our understanding of Chinese
literary evolution but also underscores its
relevance in the global context of cultural
exchange and adaptation.
Furthermore, the scholarly debates surrounding
the poetic revolution and its relationship with
modern new poetry illustrate the complexities of
literary
progression.
These
discussions
emphasize the need for a nuanced approach to
understanding
the
connections
between
historical
traditions
and
contemporary
innovations.
In conclusion, the late Qing period offers
invaluable insights into the transformative
dynamics of Chinese literature, making it a critical
area of study for appreciating the continuity and
adaptability of China's literary heritage. By re-
evaluating this era, scholars can better
contextualize the development of modern
Chinese literature within its broader historical
and cultural framework.
R
EFERENCES
1.
夏
晓虹
.
觉世与传世
——
梁启超的文学道路
.
北
京
:
中
华书局
,2006.
2.
连燕堂
.
梁启超与晚清文学革命
[M].
桂林
:
漓江
出版社
,1991:155.
3.
刘冰冰
.
在古典与
现代性之间
——
黄遵
宪诗歌
研究
.
山
东大学博士论文
,
未刊稿
.
4.
杨站军
.
游移在激
进与保守之间
——
诗界革命
研究
[D].
上海
:
上海大学
,2007:263.
