Authors

  • D.A.Obidjanov
    Research Institute of Plant Quarantine and Protection, Uzbekistan
  • B.U.Matniyozov
    Research Institute of Plant Quarantine and Protection, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajabe/Volume06Issue09-03

Keywords:

Insecticide effectiveness aphids

Abstract

The insecticide Medouz, MD, SC demonstrated high effectiveness against aphids and apple codling moth on apple trees when applied at a rate of 0.3 L/ha. We recommend the use of the insecticide Medouz, MD, SC against aphids and apple codling moth on apple trees, applied at a rate of 0.3 L/ha during the plant's vegetative period.


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (ISSN

2689-1018)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

11

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe

PUBLISHED DATE: - 10-09-2024
DOI: -

https://doi.org/10.37547/tajabe/Volume06Issue09-03

PAGE NO.: - 11-14

INSECTICIDE MEDOUZ, MD IN THE FIGHT
AGAINST APPLE CODLING MOTH AND
APHIDS ON APPLE TREES


D.A.Obidjanov

Research Institute of Plant Quarantine and Protection, Uzbekistan

B.U.Matniyozov

Research Institute of Plant Quarantine and Protection, Uzbekistan

INTRODUCTION

To ensure food safety worldwide, research is being

conducted on advanced technologies for the
cultivation of agricultural products and their

protection from harmful organisms. However, a
portion of the produce grown in orchards is lost

due to the impact of these harmful organisms.
Therefore, the distribution, damage, and bio-

ecological characteristics of apple pests, as well as
the effectiveness of entomophages in controlling

their population, and on this basis, the
improvement of an integrated pest control system

for apples, have significant scientific and practical

importance.
Agriculture is a key sector in the economy of the

Republic of Uzbekistan. Modern agricultural

production technologies, based on the widespread
use of pesticides and mineral fertilizers, have

largely solved the problem of food security but
have also created multiple ecological, medical, and

environmental issues, including concerns about
environmentally friendly and biologically sound

food, land rehabilitation, and restoration of soil

fertility. Consequently, the introduction of new

classes of pesticides with different mechanisms of

action, high selectivity, and low toxicity to warm-
blooded organisms has become increasingly

relevant.
Globally, the development and application of new,

non-toxic plant protection products for humans

and animals have become a priority. Research
focused on the creation of plant protection agents

based on microorganisms and their metabolites, as
well as the search for plant-derived substances

with potential pesticidal activity, is of particular

importance.

However,

research

on

the

development of pesticides based on chemical

compounds that offer high effectiveness, selectivity
for target applications, and rapid environmental

breakdown continues.
Ensuring national food security, producing

environmentally friendly products, significantly

increasing export potential in the agro-industrial
complex, expanding new intensive orchards,

creating and introducing new pest-resistant crop

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Open Access

Abstract


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (ISSN

2689-1018)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

12

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe

varieties that are suitable for local soil and climatic
conditions are among the pressing tasks of the

modern era. Significant resources have been
allocated to achieve these goals, with support

provided to fruit farmers, resulting in substantial
outcomes. Uzbek horticultural products are in

demand on the global market, with food and fruit-
vegetable exports reaching around $5 billion. Over

the past three years, the volume of exported

agricultural products has more than tripled. Our
country exports more than 180 types of premium

fruits and vegetables, as well as processed
products, to 80 countries worldwide. Uzbekistan

ranks among the top ten countries globally in terms
of export volumes for apricots, plums, grapes, nuts,

cabbage, and numerous other fruits and vegetables
[14].
In the 21st century, the FAO experts recognize the

integrated plant protection concept as the leading

approach to addressing food security issues [14,
15].
To preserve the ecological sustainability potential

of plants, including their resistance to pathogens,
the use of pesticides should be minimized.

Organophosphorus insectoacaricides, which can
block the function of key oxidative-reductive

enzymes responsible for ecological stability,
including resistance to pathogens, are particularly

hazardous for plants [11, 12].
The requirements for pesticide registration are

becoming increasingly stringent. For example, in
the USA, over 1,200 active pesticide substances are

registered, with 20,000 products on the market
annually, amounting to $12 billion. Since 1988,

under the auspices of the Environmental
Protection Agency, the re-registration of pesticides

has been systematically conducted according to
new requirements, improving the quality of the

pesticide assortment. In the European Union, out of

967 pesticides listed, a decision was made to
support 463. A total of 429 products are not subject

to re-registration, with 48 added to the list and 27
removed [3, 13].
M.T. Petrukhina conducted an experiment using

entobacterin mixed with Bordeaux mixture,
achieving 98.8% effectiveness on the 12th day of

the trial. O.Z. Metlitsky demonstrated the high

effectiveness of biopreparations against the
American white moth. In 1986-1987, employees of

the Institute of Zoology of the Academy of Sciences
of Ukraine applied lepidocid at a rate of 1.5 kg/ha

against orchard pests, achieving 84.0-90.0%
effectiveness [6, 10].
Although a complete abandonment of chemical

methods in orchards and vineyards is currently

impossible, a shift towards biological protection
has resulted in a threefold reduction in pesticide

use. The feasibility of biological protection is also
confirmed by increased production profitability.

For example, in Primorye, profitability from
chemical methods was 19.5%, from the combined

use of biological and chemical methods

26%, and

from the biological method alone

36.7% [2, 4].

Among fruit crops and grapevines, mites are some

of the most dangerous pests. Biological control

methods for these crops are not as well-developed
as those for pests belonging to the insect class.

Some studies have noted the impact of leaf
hairiness on the population of spider mites on

grapes, where varieties with weak and medium
hairiness are particularly affected by mites, while

varieties with felted hairiness are less damaged [1].

METHODS

The insecticide Medouz, MD was tested in a

vigorous apple orchard belonging to the farmer's

enterprise “Kuzibayev Jamolbek” located in the

Shavat district of Khorezm region. The area is
situated in the Turan lowland agricultural zone.

The orchard was established 12 years ago, with

apple trees of the “Golden Delishes” variety.

Treatments were carried out using a K-90

backpack motor sprayer, with a calculated working
fluid consumption rate of 1000 l/ha. The trials

were conducted in the morning, between 7 and 8
a.m., when the air temperature did not exceed 28°C

and wind speed was 1 m/s. The research utilized
commonly accepted methods in entomology and

agricultural entomology (Bondorenko, 1982;
Murodov, 1986), as well as methodological

guidelines (2004) and Abbot's formula for
calculations [5, 6, 7, 8, 9].

RESULTS

The insecticide Medouz, MD was tested against


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (ISSN

2689-1018)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

13

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe

aphids. When tested at a consumption rate of 0.3
l/ha, the effectiveness on the 1st day was 95.7%

(Table 1) and increased to 97.4% and 99.0% on the
3rd and 7th days, respectively. Only on the 14th

and 21st days was there a slight decrease in
effectiveness to 98.2% and 97.2%, respectively.

These data are consistent with the effectiveness
indicators of the reference variant, where Nuker-

Pro was applied at a consumption rate of 1.0 l/ha,
with effectiveness on the 1st day of 91.2%, on the

3rd day

93.0%, on the 7th day

99.0%, on the

14th day

98.2%, and on the 21st day

97.2%

(Table 1). These results indicate the high
effectiveness of Medouz, MD against aphids on

apple trees (Table 1).

Table 2

Biological effectiveness of the Meadows, MD product against the codling moth on

apple trees

Field Trial, 2023, Khorezm Region, Shavat District, Kuzibayev Jamolbek Farm

Field

Experiments

For

reference

l/ha

Average number of fruits

considered per tree

Fruit damage, %

Reduction in crop

damage compared to

control, %

Fallen

fruits

Harvest

Fallen

fruits

Harvest

Removable

Gross

Removable

Gross

Removable

Gross

Medouz,

MD s/k

0,3

17,8

135,4

153,2

6,8

3,6

5,2

90,2

90,1

Nuker-Pro,

55% em.k.

(template)

1,0

18,2

128,4

146,6

7,4

4,0

5,7

89,1

89,1

Control

(unprocessed)

-

57,6

77,8

135,4

68,2

36,8

52,5

-

-


Further, the insecticide Medouz, MD was tested

against the apple codling moth. When applied at a

rate of 0.3 l/ha, an analysis of the harvested apples
showed that the reduction in damage to the

harvested crop relative to the control was 90.2%,

and the overall yield was 90.1% (Table 2). These

results are also consistent with the reference
variant, where Nuker-Pro was applied at a rate of

1.0 l/ha, resulting in a reduction in damage to the
harvested crop of 89.1%, and the overall yield

89.1% (Table 2).

Table 2

Biological effectiveness of the Meadows, MD product against the codling moth on

apple trees

Field Trial, 2023, Khorezm Region, Shavat District, Kuzibayev Jamolbek Farm

Field

Experiments

For

reference

l/ha

Average number of fruits

considered per tree

Fruit damage, %

Reduction in crop

damage compared to

control, %

Fallen

fruits

Harvest

Fallen

fruits

Harvest

Removable

Gross

Removable

Gross

Removable

Gross

Medouz,

MD s/k

0,3

17,8

135,4

153,2

6,8

3,6

5,2

90,2

90,1

Nuker-Pro,

55% em.k.

(template)

1,0

18,2

128,4

146,6

7,4

4,0

5,7

89,1

89,1

Control

(unprocessed)

-

57,6

77,8

135,4

68,2

36,8

52,5

-

-


background image

THE USA JOURNALS

THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING (ISSN

2689-1018)

VOLUME 06 ISSUE09

14

https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajabe

CONCLUSIONS

The insecticide Medouz, MD SC, demonstrated high

effectiveness against aphids and the codling moth

on apple trees at a consumption rate of 0,3 l/ha. We
recommend the insecticide Medouz, MD SC, for use

against aphids and the codling moth on apple trees
at a consumption rate of 0,3 l/ha by treating during

the plant's vegetation period.
The preparation form is convenient to use, quickly

forming a working solution when mixed with
water. No phytotoxicity was observed after

spraying.

REFERENCES
1.

Абдулагатов

А.З.,

Шихрагимов

А.К.,

Абдулагатова Д.А. Паутинный клещ на
виноградниках Дагестана// Ж.Защита и

карантин растений.

-

М..

-

М

-2012.-

№ 2.

-

С.29

-

30.

2.

Бровко Г.А., Бровко С.П. Биометод получает

признание

//Ж.Защита

и

карантин

растений.

-

М..

-

М.

-2007.-

№11.

-

С.32.

3.

Dilshod Obidzhanov & Mansur Muminov.

Combat against roll moth in apple orchards.

The American Journal of Agriculture and
Biomedical Engineering, Published Date:

September 30, 2022 | Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajabe/Volume04Is

sue09-02

4.

Захарченко В.А. Повышены требования к

регистрации пестицидов //Ж.Защита и
карантин растений.

-

М..

-

М

-2007.-

№3.

-

С.21.

5.

Инсектицид, акарицид, биологик фаол

моддалар ва фунгицидларни синаш бўйича
услубий кўрсатмалар, II

-

нчи нашр. –

Тошкент, 2004. –

104 б.

6.

Коваленков В.Г., Глушко Д.А., Плотникова

В.В. Курс –

на биометод //Ж.Защита и

карантин растений.

-

М..

-

М.

-2007.-

№6.

-

С.20

-

22.

7.

Методические указания по испытанию

инсектицидов,

акарицидов

и

моллюскоцидов в растениеводстве. –

М.,

Госагропром СССР, "Сельхозхимия", ВИЗР,

-

1986. -279

с.

8.

Метлицкий О.З. Система защиты яблони и

груши //Ж.Защита и карантин растений.

-

М..

-

М.

-2003-

№6.

-

С.17

-19.

9.

Мохаткин А.Г., Мохаткина Л.Я. Феромонный

мониторинг

яблонной

плодожрки.

//Защита карантин растений.

- 2005.-

№5.

-

С.36

-38.

10.

Обиджанов Д. Опасный вредитель в садах

Узбекистана //Ж. Защита и карантин

растений. –

Москва, 2009. –

№3. –

С.52.

11.

Учаров А.Б., Обиджанов Д., Применение

микробиологического препарата биослип
пв в защите лимона от сосущих вредителей.

«Фитосанитарная безопасность: угрозы и
пути решения» Международной научно

-

практической конференции, посвященной

65-

летию основания института, 14

-15

декабря 2023 г., г. Алматы, Республика
Казахстан. info@niizkr.kz С. 485

-488.

12.

Balachowsky A.S. Entomologie Appliguee A L`

Agriculture Tome I Coleopteres.

Second

volume 120 Boulevard Saint.

German, Paris.

1990.

567.

1391.

13.

Debach P., Hagen K.S. Manipubation of

Entomophagaus Species //Biological Control
Insect Pestand Weeds, Editor P.Debach

Chapman and Holl Ltd 11 New Fetter Lane
London E.C.

2004; -4.-436-439.

14.

The DCPC International Congress. Crop Science

and Technology. 2005. Congress Proceedings.

31 Oct

2 Nov 2005, vol.1-636 h.

15.

http://news.mail.ru/inworld/uzbekistan/eco

nomics

References

Абдулагатов А.З., Шихрагимов А.К., Абдулагатова Д.А. Паутинный клещ на виноградниках Дагестана// Ж.Защита и карантин растений.-М..-М -2012.-№ 2.-С.29-30.

Бровко Г.А., Бровко С.П. Биометод получает признание //Ж.Защита и карантин растений.-М..-М.-2007.-№11.-С.32.

Dilshod Obidzhanov & Mansur Muminov. Combat against roll moth in apple orchards. The American Journal of Agriculture and Biomedical Engineering, Published Date: September 30, 2022 | Crossref doi: https://doi.org/10.37547/tajabe/Volume04Issue09-02

Захарченко В.А. Повышены требования к регистрации пестицидов //Ж.Защита и карантин растений.-М..-М -2007.-№3.-С.21.

Инсектицид, акарицид, биологик фаол моддалар ва фунгицидларни синаш бўйича услубий кўрсатмалар, II-нчи нашр. –Тошкент, 2004. – 104 б.

Коваленков В.Г., Глушко Д.А., Плотникова В.В. Курс – на биометод //Ж.Защита и карантин растений.-М..-М.-2007.-№6.-С.20-22.

Методические указания по испытанию инсектицидов, акарицидов и моллюскоцидов в растениеводстве. – М., Госагропром СССР, "Сельхозхимия", ВИЗР, -1986. -279 с.

Метлицкий О.З. Система защиты яблони и груши //Ж.Защита и карантин растений.-М..-М. -2003-№6.-С.17-19.

Мохаткин А.Г., Мохаткина Л.Я. Феромонный мониторинг яблонной плодожрки. //Защита карантин растений.- 2005.-№5.-С.36-38.

Обиджанов Д. Опасный вредитель в садах Узбекистана //Ж. Защита и карантин растений. – Москва, 2009. – №3. – С.52.

Учаров А.Б., Обиджанов Д., Применение микробиологического препарата биослип пв в защите лимона от сосущих вредителей. «Фитосанитарная безопасность: угрозы и пути решения» Международной научно-практической конференции, посвященной 65-летию основания института, 14-15 декабря 2023 г., г. Алматы, Республика Казахстан. info@niizkr.kz С. 485-488.

Balachowsky A.S. Entomologie Appliguee A L` Agriculture Tome I Coleopteres. – Second volume 120 Boulevard Saint. – German, Paris. 1990. – 567. – 1391.

Debach P., Hagen K.S. Manipubation of Entomophagaus Species //Biological Control Insect Pestand Weeds, Editor P.Debach Chapman and Holl Ltd 11 New Fetter Lane London E.C. – 2004; -4.-436-439.

The DCPC International Congress. Crop Science and Technology. 2005. Congress Proceedings. 31 Oct – 2 Nov 2005, vol.1-636 h.