The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
44
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Type
Original Research
PAGE NO.
44-65
10.37547/tajiir/Volume07Issue07-05
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
25 June 2025
ACCEPTED
30 June 2025
PUBLISHED
07 July 2025
VOLUME
Vol.07 Issue 07 2025
CITATION
Vinod Kumar Enugala. (2025). Carbon Dashboard for Real-Time Embodied
Emissions Tracking. The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations
and Research, 7(07). https://doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/Volume07Issue07-05
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Carbon Dashboard for
Real-Time Embodied
Emissions Tracking
Vinod Kumar Enugala
Department of Civil Engineering, University of New Haven, CT,
USA
Abstract:
A large proportion of the worldwide emissions
caused by greenhouse gases is attributed to the
construction sector and the manufacturing industry,
with much of it related to embodied carbon or emissions
associated with the extraction of materials, their
production, transportation, and assembly. This paper
involves the conceptualization and validation of a real-
time carbon dashboard meant to monitor embodied
emissions in supply chains and project stages. The
dashboard is designed to provide dynamic monitoring,
predictive analysis, and forecasting of emissions,
integrating technologies from the Internet of Things
(IoT) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and presenting
the results in visual forms. An on-site pilot test at a
commercial construction project demonstrated that the
system conducted time-stamped emission logging and
alerted to high-impact building materials, and can
transform procurement and operational practices. The
article describes the architecture of the dashboard, the
methods of data acquisition, the validation process, and
the practical implications, as well as its opportunities to
facilitate sustainable decision-making and stakeholder
engagement. The barriers to cost implementation, data
quality, and system integration will be discussed, as well
as future challenges such as integrating machine
learning and blockchain. Carbon tracking, specifically
real-time embodied carbon tracking, has been identified
as a crucial tool for achieving net-zero targets, ensuring
compliance, and facilitating ESG reporting. Not only
does the dashboard enhance the visibility of emissions,
but it also serves as a strategic lever to advocate for
building towards carbon-mindful action, which is
applicable across the built environment.
Keywords:
Embodied Carbon, Real-Time Emissions
Tracking, Carbon Dashboard, IoT in Sustainability, Life
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
45
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Cycle Assessment (LCA)
INTRODUCTION
Carbon reduction has become a significant issue in both
politics and business as events like climate change take
center stage. However, existing endeavors have
prioritized operational carbon emissions, which are
generated through heating, cooling, and electrical
usage. There is growing interest in embodied carbon,
the amount of greenhouse gases associated with mining
raw materials, processing components, shipping them
overseas, and assembling the result. Embodied
emissions have the potential to account for as much as
half of a building's lifetime carbon footprint, according
to the World Green Building Council, particularly in new
constructions.
Construction,
manufacturing,
and
logistics industries, in particular, are under growing
pressure to measure and, where possible, mitigate these
hidden effects far earlier in the lifecycle of a facility or
product, even before it reaches the customer.
Traditional lifecycle assessments (LCAs) and end-of-life
carbon reporting have their place, but they are too late
to consider daily. Design teams have already made final
decisions about material choices, supply routes, and
construction methods, usually months before the
numbers have been added up. Real-time dynamic
tracking changes. A carbon dashboard that integrates
live IoT sensors, RFID, material passports, and cloud-
based enterprise systems can reveal the embodied
carbon status of a project at the point when steel is
ordered, a truck leaves the factory gate, or a
prefabricated module is installed on site. Real-time
responses enable project managers to transition to less
impactful materials, streamline logistics, or adjust tasks
if the carbon curve begins trending counterproductively.
In addition to enhancing environmental stewardship,
flexibility also provides a competitive boost to
businesses, improving the value of ESG credentials,
increasing the speed of green-building certifications,
and positioning companies to make gains rather than
simply paying for clean-up under new carbon-pricing
regimes.
This article presents a feasible structure for creating a
Carbon Dashboard. It describes why real-time
information can be harvested at multiple points in a
product or project life cycle, translated into metrics that
provide meaning and serve stakeholders through an
easy-to-understand interface. Through a presentation of
mandatory technologies, analytical engines, and
visualization methods, accompanied by an investigation
within a pilot deployment in practice, the discussion
reveals the dimension of continuous tracking to not only
enhance carbon accountability but also support teams
in instilling a low-carbon approach to day-to-day
practice.
2. Literature Review
2.1 Embodied Carbon: Definition and Relevance
Embodied carbon is what carbon dioxide emissions are
associated with: the extraction, processing of the
materials, manufacture, transportation, and installation
aspects of the materials (
). This contrasts with
operational carbon, which covers emissions created by
the use of a building or product, such as energy used for
lighting, heating, or machinery. Although some
operational emissions can be minimized through energy
efficiency and renewable energy, embodied emissions
are set in stone at the moment of construction or
production, so they must be tracked and reduced in an
early stage.
Embodied carbon in the building sector can be identified
in various structural components, including concrete,
steel, glass, and insulation. For example, direct gross
emissions of concrete alone have been estimated to
contribute approximately 8 percent of global carbon
dioxide emissions, primarily due to the production of
cement. Embodied emissions can be associated with
raw materials, such as plastics, metals, and textiles,
which are used in the manufacturing of products. These
materials
demand
carbon-intensive
industrial
processes. Production costs in the transport sector, such
as the production of cars, including batteries for electric
vehicles, also possess a high embodied carbon cost.
Embodied carbon is receiving increased attention as a
target for intervention, particularly in industries where
the use of materials is unavoidable, as countries adopt
net-zero emission targets.
This growing concern is visually summarized in Figure 1,
which illustrates the stages at which embodied carbon
accumulates throughout the material life cycle.
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
46
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Figure 1: embodied carbon
2.2 Current Tracking Systems and Platforms
Several tools have been developed to estimate and
report embodied emissions, and some have gained
significant popularity in the construction sector (
Among the best-known tools is OneClick LCA, a platform
that assists architects, engineers, and contractors in
conducting life cycle assessments by referencing a
comprehensive repository of Environmental Product
Declarations (EPDs). OneClick LCA enables users to
calculate the embodied carbon mass of various
materials and building stages, as well as compare
alternative material sourcing strategies. This aligns with
the growing industry shift toward data-driven, dual
sourcing approaches that improve environmental
transparency and reduce supply chain vulnerabilities
(
). The second standard tool is the Embodied Carbon
in Construction Calculator, also known as EC3. As a free,
cloud-based tool, EC3 was developed in the United
States and allows users to determine the carbon
footprint of building materials before purchasing them.
It is based on expanding the EPDs database accepted by
a third party. It is beneficial when making procurement
decisions aimed at selecting products with lower
embodied carbon values.
Although these are practical tools often used, they
mainly offer a static assessment. It requires manual
work for inputting data, and updated information is not
typically automated. Consequently, they may be
suitable for use in the design phase and post-
construction reporting, but not during live operations.
They are also requiring the use of EPDs, which are
regionally and supplier-specific in terms of accessibility
and quality. These shortcomings leave an opportunity
for instruments that can provide real-time, automated
information about embodied emissions as they occur.
As illustrated in Table 1, several tools have emerged to
help estimate embodied carbon across construction and
manufacturing projects. OneClick LCA, a commercial
software solution, enables users to conduct life cycle
assessments by leveraging a robust Environmental
Product Declaration (EPD) database.
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
47
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Table 1: Comparison of Existing Embodied Carbon Tracking Tools
Tool
Type
Functionality
Strengths
Limitations
OneClick LCA
Commercial
Software
Conducts life cycle
assessments using
EPDs database
Comprehensive material
analysis; supports full
building lifecycle
Requires manual data
input; lacks real-time
updates; EPD-dependent
EC3 (Embodied
Carbon in
Construction
Calculator)
Free, Cloud-
Based Tool
Estimates embodied
carbon of materials
before purchase using
EPDs
Supports procurement
decisions; third-party
verified data
Static tool; not integrated
into live operations;
region/supplier-specific
EPDs
2.3 Data Dashboards (Sustainability)
Real-time dashboards are not new to other fields of
sustainability, and evidently, the most notable infusion
has been in the field of energy and water use (
). For
example, building energy management systems often
include dashboards that display electricity and HVAC
usage in real-time. These dashboards enable facility
managers to identify any rise in usage, as well as track
any equipment faults and then take swift remedial
action. Likewise, intelligent water meters provide real-
time information to dashboards that monitor
consumption characteristics and leakages, promoting
conservation methods. Real-time feedback based on
dashboards has been found to influence behavior,
thereby enhancing sustainability performance. Real-
time dashboards of energy in commercial buildings were
associated with energy reductions of up to 15 percent,
as they enable users to respond promptly to
inefficiencies. Systems of this kind demonstrate the
effectiveness of combining sensors, cloud computing,
and data visualization in environmental monitoring.
The carbon tracking directly applies to these lessons.
Although energy and water dashboards are commonly
used to monitor operational impacts, the same
framework can be extended to track embodied
emissions by leveraging emissions data from
construction activities, material deliveries, and digital
twins. Carbon tracking is an active but still-developing
field within the broader category of real-time dashboard
solutions. However, the success of similar real-time data
systems in domains such as big data management and
performance monitoring
—
particularly those using
scalable
NoSQL
architectures
like
MongoDB
—
demonstrates the feasibility and reliability of this
approach (
). By reflecting on these established
practices and adapting them to the specific challenges of
embodied carbon, tools can be developed that not only
visualize emissions but also drive efficiency in material
procurement and construction timelines.
3. Theoretical Framework
3.1 Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Methodology
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a technique used to
categorize the environmental impact of a product,
procedure, or system throughout its entire life cycle. LCA
also provides an organized framework for calculating the
level of emissions associated with the production,
transportation, installation, maintenance, and disposal
of materials in the context of embodied carbon. This is
accomplished through the following four steps: goal and
scope
determination,
inventory
study,
impact
determination, and interpretation.
Phase one involves the clear separation of system
boundaries and the functional unit (
). As an illustration,
aiming to measure the embodied carbon of a residential
property over a 50-year perspective, with the scope
limited to construction materials and activities. The
second stage is the life cycle inventory, which involves
gathering information on all inputs and outputs,
including the volumes of raw materials used, the
amount of fuel consumed, distances covered, and the
amount of energy utilized. The third stage is the
transformation of this data into environmental impacts
(carbon dioxide emissions) using emission factors taken
from databases, such as Eco Invent or Inventory of
Carbon and Energy (ICE). Lastly, the interpretation phase
involves analyzing results and making decisions or
recommendations.
LCA depends on material flows and chains of processes.
Every process throughout the supply chain also
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
48
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
contributes to emissions, including the mining of raw
materials, manufacturing, shipping, and use. Even minor
modifications of one component of the chain, such as
using a vendor located near each other or cultivating
recycled steel instead of virgin steel, may have profound
implications for the embodied emissions at the end. An
effective measurement of such flows through LCA lays
the basis for measuring and lowering the effect of
carbon in a quantifiable manner.
As illustrated in Figure 2, the LCA process is structured
into four key phases: goal and scope definition,
inventory analysis, impact assessment,
and interpretation.
Figure 2: Life Cycle Assessment Stages
3.2 Integration of IoT and Sensors
The use of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies in
carbon tracking enables the transformation of
traditional monitoring into real-time, data-driven
processes (
). IoT devices are capable of gathering
physical data
—
such as material movement, fuel
consumption, and equipment use
—
and conveying it to
centralized systems without human involvement. During
embodied emissions tracking, various IoT-based tools
are deployed, including RFID tags for material
identification, GPS modules for tracking transport
distances, and smart meters for logging energy use. This
automated data flow mirrors principles used in secure
and intelligent systems integration in other sectors,
where real-time input is essential for system
responsiveness and reliability (
). By adapting these
practices, carbon dashboards can provide continuous
feedback loops to inform sustainable decisions across
the construction lifecycle.
The RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) tags are
frequently embedded in construction materials or
shipping containers. They can be tracked automatically
using these tags as goods move through the supply
chain. To illustrate, when a batch of cement leaves the
manufacturer, the RFID tag records the shipment
details, and the system updates when it reaches the site.
GPS modules provide additional information related to
location, and transport routes can be tracked. The
emissions from logistics operations can be categorized
by distance, type of fuel, and vehicle efficiency. Smart
meters, which are typically used in factories or
construction sites, enable the real-time measurement of
power consumption, contributing to the evaluation of
carbon emissions from onsite machinery and
equipment. All these information sources are integrated
by secure networks, commonly with cloud systems,
which combine the data towards centralized data
storage. This source-to-dashboard data flow consists of
at least three layers: first, sensor data must be gathered
and pre-processed; then, it is transferred to a storage
facility; and subsequently, the emission factor
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
49
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
algorithms are applied to the data and visualized on the
dashboard. This tiered solution will ensure that
information is timely, accurate, and readily available to
decision-makers.
3.3
Human-Computer
Interaction
and
Data
Visualization
The carbon dashboard may be effective in presenting
information, as well as in the accuracy of the data used.
Indeed, data visualization is a crucial element in
converting intricate data sets into comprehensible and
usable information. There are guidelines for good
dashboard design, including clarity, simplicity, and
relevance. The common elements used include charts,
graphs, color-coded indicators, and real-time alerts,
which are used to display the user's status of embodied
emissions.
The human-computer interaction (HCI) theory suggests
that human interaction with dashboards influences the
decisions individuals make and the actions they take
(
). For example, when a project manager receives a
real-time alert indicating that the amount of carbon
emitted from a given material shipment exceeds the
budgeted amount, they are more likely to ask questions
and initiate immediate corrective actions. Behavioral
science studies indicate that they boost awareness and
prompt more sustainable decisions when feedbacks are
presented promptly. A comparison-based dashboard,
such as one comparing emissions to those of previous
projects or an industry average, can spur improvement.
The combination of the LCA framework, IoT data
tracking, and user-focused dashboard design creates a
solid theoretical basis for developing real-time
embodied carbon monitoring tools. These components
collaborate to ensure that carbon information is both
technically and practically viable while also providing
helpful information to inform improved decisions in
design, procurement, and operational activities.
4. System Architecture and Components
4.1 Architecture Overview
The system architecture for a carbon dashboard to track
embodied emissions in real time involves data
collection, data processing, data storage, and data
analysis within a visualization window, all working
together through connections between the different
components. All these elements combined would
ensure that emissions data could be tracked and viewed
in an easy-to-read format, allowing for real-time use. A
system can be deployed with either cloud-based or on-
premises architecture in two main options. A cloud
system is built on remote servers and can be used to
access and manage information stored on those servers
over the Internet. It is scalable, remotely accessible, and
can be integrated with third-party services, such as
environmental databases or external analysis tools. This
model is suitable for mass projects involving multiple
stakeholders located in various locations. It is also
capable of providing automatic updates and centralized
control over datasets and configurations. All large cloud
providers, such as Amazon Web Services (AWS),
Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, provide the
infrastructure on which these systems can be hosted (
In contrast, an on-premise architecture would entail
installing the system within the local infrastructure of a
firm or construction site. This type of model is favored in
environments where data privacy and security are a
concern or where connectivity is poor. On-premise
systems allow all data and system configurations to be
under the organization's control. Yet, these types of
setups tend to be more costly to invest in initially and
require continual maintenance by IT staff members.
The system architecture typically consists of several
interconnected layers, regardless of the specific
deployment model used. These include a data
acquisition layer, a processing and analytics engine, a
database layer, and a front-end visualization interface.
Data streams originate from physical IoT sensors or
software programs and are ingested into the system,
where they are processed into actionable insights and
rendered on interactive dashboards. This modular and
layered design mirrors the principles of fault-tolerant,
event-driven architectures, which ensure continuity and
resilience even under high data loads (
). Moreover, the
clear separation of responsibilities within the
architecture aligns with best practices in microservices
development,
where
context
boundaries
are
deliberately established to enhance scalability,
maintainability, and system evolution (
As illustrated in Figure 3, the system is designed to offer
seamless data flow
—
from acquisition to end-user
interface
—
ensuring that emissions can be monitored
and interpreted as they occur.
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
50
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Figure 3: Approach of the real-time ICF calculation.
4.2 Essential Elements
The data acquisition layer forms the base of the system.
The latter defined this layer, which is responsible for
collecting real-time information about a range of
sources that participate in the life cycle of construction
materials or a versatile industrial process. Movement,
energy consumption, and equipment use are captured
through RFID scanners, GPS trackers, and smart meters,
which are hardware devices installed. Application
programming interfaces (APIs) used to extract data
within Building Information Modeling (BIM) systems,
digital material passports, procurement logs, and
transport management software are all based on
software. These inputs are updated continuously to
reflect the type of materials, quantity, source, and flow
required for computing embodied emissions.
After the data-capturing process is complete, it is
relayed to the engine used to calculate emissions. The
emission factors of each input are determined using life
cycle assessment (LCA) databases, such as Eco invent,
GaBi, or the Inventory of Carbon and Energy (ICE), in this
engine. To illustrate a similar example, when recording
the delivery of one ton of steel, the engine accesses the
database information regarding the emissions of that
ton, which is then multiplied by the quantity received.
Sophisticated systems also utilize artificial intelligence
(AI)-based estimators that can fill in missing pieces of
unmeasured data, estimate emissions based on
historical trends, and correct calculations in real-time
when anomalous sensor data is detected or when a
material is substituted with another. The last inner
structure is the dashboard interface that converts
processed information into visual formats for users. This
interface is primarily web-based and readable on both
desktops and mobile devices. It displays emissions
information using graphs, time-series charts, maps, and
heat meters. Users can view emissions at varying levels
of detail, including shipment-wise, material-wise, by
project stage, or over time. Filtering and custom views
enable reviewing stakeholders to make informed
decisions about specific indicators, compare alternative
design scenarios, or identify emissions exceeding limits.
It also features an interactive component on the
dashboard, including alerts, reports, and integration
capabilities (
). Project managers can even be informed
through real-time notifications when emissions surpass
specific set requirements. Automated reporting
capabilities produce downloadable summaries that can
be used to comply with reporting requirements or
sustainability
reporting
standards.
Integration
capabilities
ensure
that
the
dashboard
can
communicate with other systems within the enterprise,
such as procurement platforms, carbon offset registries,
or construction management tools. Overview: The
system architecture of a real-time carbon dashboard
relies on a powerful list of technologies to gather,
compute, and display embodied carbon data. Sensor-
based inputs, coupled with computation through LCA
and its effective visualization, become possible, enabling
the dynamic monitoring and proactive mitigation of
carbon impact throughout a project's lifecycle.
As shown in Table 2, the Data Acquisition Layer serves as
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
51
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
the foundation, collecting live information from various
physical and digital sources throughout the material life
cycle.
Table 2: Core Components of a Real-Time Carbon Dashboard System
Component
Function
Technologies Used
Key Features
Data
Acquisition
Layer
Collects real-time data from
physical and digital sources
across the material life cycle
RFID scanners, GPS trackers,
smart meters, APIs (from BIM,
procurement logs, digital
passports, TMS)
Tracks material type, quantity,
source, energy use, and
transport activity
Emissions
Calculation
Engine
Computes embodied
emissions based on input data
and emission factors
LCA databases (Ecoinvent,
GaBi, ICE), AI-based estimators
Real-time calculation, fills
missing data, corrects
anomalies, handles material
substitutions
Dashboard
Interface
Visualizes emissions data for
users, supports analysis and
reporting
Web-based UI, graphs, time-
series charts, heatmaps, maps
Interactive views (material-
wise, shipment-wise, stage-
wise), filtering tools, emissions
alerts
Reporting &
Integration
Module
Enables communication,
alerts, and data sharing with
other enterprise systems
Automated reports, API
integrations, notification
systems
Real-time alerts, downloadable
summaries, integration with
procurement, carbon registries,
CM tools
5. METHODOLOGY
5.1 Research Design
The methodology employed in developing the carbon
dashboard novelty construct is an exploratory and
analytical study approach. This approach is suitable for
constructing a new system with little precedence, and
the goal is to develop and demonstrate a working
prototype. The exploratory component involves
identifying user requirements, technical issues, and
system needs through a literature search, available
tools, and existing industry practices. The analytical part
entails planning the dashboard architecture and
implementing the solution, followed by testing it in a
real-world setting to determine its functionality and
performance. This integration helps innovation, as well
as practical verification of the dashboard in real-time
embodied carbon monitoring.
The process began with gathering requirements through
interviews with construction engineers, sustainability
consultants, and developers of digital tools. The insights
and experiences of these stakeholders were
instrumental in shaping the structure of the dashboard
and identifying the essential features to incorporate.
Once the system architecture was established, the
visioning phase focused on designing all tiers of the
dashboard
—
from data acquisition to real-time
visualization. The solution was then tested under both
simulated and actual construction environments to
evaluate its capacity for emissions reduction. This
stakeholder-driven and iterative design process aligns
with practices in predictive analytics and intelligent
system development, where input from domain experts
and phased validation are central to creating reliable
and impactful tools (
5.2 Data sources and acquisition
A real-time carbon tracking system requires reliable and
diverse data sources for its success. The research utilized
both static and dynamic data to provide a
comprehensive coverage of emissions. The most
important sources of static data were Environmental
Product Declarations (EPDs), material passports, and
Building Information Modeling (BIM) outputs in digital
form. EPDs produced uniform carbon factors for specific
materials, including cement, steel, timber, and
insulation. The BIM models provided more precise
quantities of materials, dimensions, and dates of
material procurement, which helped estimate the
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
52
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
baseline emissions of each building component.
Seamless data collection was achieved through the real-
time feeds of construction equipment, transport
systems, and supply chain platforms. The devices on
delivery trucks, which are GPS-enabled, provide distance
and route information, enabling the proper calculation
of transport emissions. The energy consumption of the
equipment and tentative erections was accounted for by
smart meters positioned on the construction sites.
Procurement systems will present real-time information
on material deliveries, contributing to the confirmation
of the schedule compliance and the emission loads.
Researchers developed APIs to automatically retrieve
and update such data, which helps eliminate the need
for manual input and lessons.
As illustrated in Figure 4, which aligns with net-zero
planning stages, the system integrates both planned
carbon targets and live operational data to facilitate
continual alignment and course correction.
Figure 4: -net-zero-plan-stage
5.3 Development Model and Utilities
Created with the help of open-source and cloud-
connected development tools, the dashboard was
designed to be flexible, with compatibility with IoT
systems. Node-RED, a visual programming system of
choice for real-time, real-time transactions, was used to
manage the data flow and logic. It facilitated the speedy
prototyping of labor processes that interconnected
sensors, APIs, and processing motors. Monitoring time-
series data, as well as the visual analytics of the
dashboard, were created using G, which is widely used
for tracking time-series databases, surveillance, and
real-time notifications (
). Grafana also offered
customization of dashboards, allowing for the display of
data on emissions at various granularities. PostgreSQL
database was used as backend storage, and its
robustness, scalability, and spatial data capabilities
enabled location-based emissions analysis. Python was
used for data processing and integration activities,
where access to a host of libraries enabled the
calculation of emissions, as well as libraries that aid in
LCA modeling and conversion activities. To support
compatibility with IoT infrastructure, the system was
connected to platforms such as Azure IoT Hub and AWS
Green grass, allowing for a seamless connection
between sensors, cloud storage, and the dashboard
environment.
5.4 Testing and Validation
The validation was conducted in two stages to assess the
precision and practicality of the carbon dashboard. The
initial stage involved benchmarking the system output
against the results produced by established life cycle
assessment (LCA) tools, such as OneClick LCA and Tally.
To ensure accurate comparisons of emission values
across selected materials and construction activities,
consistent methodologies were applied. Additionally,
the observed differences were analyzed to refine
emission factors and improve the precision of the
underlying algorithm. This validation approach reflects
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
53
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
practices in other data-intensive fields
—
such as
telematics in fleet management
—
where tracking
accuracy, system calibration, and real-world testing are
crucial for improving operational efficiency and
decision-making (
The second stage represented a pilot construction
project. An existing commercial mid-rise building,
currently under construction, was chosen for the
project. RFID tags were attached to primary materials,
such as rebar and precast concrete, and smart meters
monitored energy consumption by machinery. The
dashboard was observed over a four-week period. The
test demonstrated that the dashboard would be able to
monitor material-related emissions in real time and
issue an alert when they exceeded preset limits.
According to project managers, the tool helped them
make more informed decisions, initially during the
procurement process and in managing materials on-site.
Using this systematic process, the dashboard was able
to improve the perception and control of embodied
emissions in live construction projects.
As summarized in Table 3, the first stage involved
benchmarking
the dashboard’s emission outputs against
conventional life cycle assessment (LCA) tools such as
OneClick LCA and Tally
Table 3: Dashboard Testing and Validation Summary
Validation Stage
Description
Tools/Methods Used
Key Outcomes
Stage 1:
Benchmarking
Compared dashboard
emission outputs with results
from conventional LCA tools
OneClick LCA, Tally,
consistent emission factor
methodology
Identified minor discrepancies;
refined emission factors and
improved calculation accuracy
Stage 2: Pilot
Project
Real-time testing on an active
mid-rise construction project
RFID-tagged materials,
smart meters on
machinery, 4-week trial
Enabled real-time monitoring and
alerts; improved procurement and
material handling decisions
6. Dashboard Features and Functionalities
6.1 Real-Time Emission Monitoring
Monitoring real-time embodied emissions is a key
attribute of the carbon dashboard. This capability is
enabled through the continuous collection and analysis
of data sourced from construction sites, transportation
systems, and procurement channels. Each item used in
a project is assigned a unique RFID or barcode identifier,
allowing it to be tracked through every phase
—
from
material production to on-site installation. As materials
arrive and are used, the associated emissions are
automatically recorded and timestamped in the system.
This process creates a detailed, product-specific carbon
footprint history, categorized by product, location, and
activity. Similar to the application of generative models
in complex 3D environments, this granular tracking
framework allows for high-resolution mapping of real-
world systems and supports improved decision-making
in dynamic project environments (
). It is also possible
to generate timestamped carbon logs within the system,
indicating the exact time, quantity, and value of
emissions for each material transaction. These logs are
crucial in producing accurate records that can be utilized
in reporting, auditing, or certification. These logs are
capable of providing a stable basis on which emissions
performance can be measured with time in large
projects.
The dashboard also features a real-time alert solution,
which can be used to show emission hotspots to support
decision-making throughout project execution. The
alerts will be activated when high embodied carbon
value materials are delivered or when activities exceed
a specified limit, such as those that are energy-intensive.
These warnings are displayed on the dashboard and can
be reported via email or text messages. The feature
enables project managers to take corrective action, such
as reviewing procurement decisions, modifying the
construction series, or seeking alternatives that utilize
low-carbon footprint materials.
6.2 Editable Views and Filters
Due to the complexity of typical construction and
manufacturing projects, the dashboard provides flexible
filtering and visualization tools. The user can view the
data on emissions in a manner of their choice,
depending on the project requirements. The system
features numerous project profiles, enabling users to
switch between sites, phases, or product lines. Projects
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
54
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
can be set up with their carbon budgets, targets, and
reporting forms. Time steps, such as hourly, daily, and
monthly totals, can also filter the emitted information.
Such temporal filtering enables users to identify both
temporary and long-term trends, making it easy to spot
instances of operational inefficiencies or excessive
emissions. An example is an increase in emissions in a
particular week, which can suggest either a high-carbon
delivery site for a material or a high-energy-demanding
construction activity that warrants further investigation.
It is also possible to filter by the type of materials in the
dashboard (
). Users can segregate emissions
associated with concrete, steel, insulation, or other
critical materials to determine which products have the
most significant environmental impact. A construction
company can also examine emissions by phase, such as
foundation work, structural framing, or finishing. This
type of breakdown helps identify high-impact phases
and supports staged sustainability planning. The
scalability of such opinions means that they would not
only be accessible but also consumable in teams
enacting various roles and disciplines.
6.3 Carbon Budget and Forecast
The dashboard incorporates carbon budgeting and
forecasting tools that enable users to set and manage
emissions targets throughout a project’s lifecycle. These
features allow users to define carbon budgets for entire
projects or specific project segments
—
such as a building
floor or a section of headquarters
—
based on internal
sustainability
goals
or
external
environmental
benchmarks. The system continuously monitors these
budgets in real time, offering intuitive visual cues such
as progress bars and dynamic color-coding to signal
when predefined carbon thresholds are being
approached or exceeded. Much like comparative
systems used in fields such as image captioning, where
visual and performance indicators guide system
evaluation and adjustments, these dashboard features
help stakeholders quickly interpret trends and make
timely, informed decisions (
The system integrates predictive analytics to facilitate
progressive planning. The dashboard will be able to
project future emissions on the current activities by
using past and current trends in the materials used.
Forecasted models will consider sequential deliveries,
planned stages of construction, and likely options for
materials. This helps project teams make informed
decisions that prevent carbon overruns before they
occur. Comparison tools also enable users to benchmark
their performance in emissions against industry norms
or past projects. The benchmarks help set expectations
and identify areas that need improvement. This
dashboard facilitates the continuity of performance-
enhancing
carbon
management
by
ensuring
accountability through the provision of clear and
understandable information. In combination, these
features can make the carbon dashboard a high-
potential real-time control and a powerful planning tool
to help teams minimize embodied emissions in a
transparent and data-driven manner.
As demonstrated in Figure 5, which outlines strategic
navigation through carbon budgets, the dashboard
incorporates budgeting and forecasting capabilities to
support forward-looking carbon management in
construction and manufacturing projects.
Figure 5: pulse/navigating-carbon-budget-guide-companies-climate
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
55
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
7. Case Study: Pilot Implementation
7.1 Site or Industry Description
To assess the applicability of the carbon dashboard in
practice, its pilot implementation was conducted in a
mid-sized commercial construction project located on
the outskirts of Nairobi, Kenya. The building was a five-
story office constructed from traditional building
materials, including steel, concrete, glass, and insulation
panels. It was chosen due to its active work schedule,
varied material consumption, and the presence of
multiple contractors, which provided an excellent
opportunity to test the dashboard's real-time
capabilities. The scope of implementation was limited to
the complete structural phase of the project, beginning
with groundworks and extending through the
completion of the superstructure. The objective was to
monitor embodied emissions linked to material
deliveries,
on-site
machinery
operations,
and
installation procedures. Particular emphasis was placed
on high-impact construction materials
—
such as cement,
rebar, and steel beams
—
due to their substantial
contribution to the overall carbon footprint. This
targeted approach reflects the importance of prioritizing
critical emission sources in complex systems, much like
ethical frameworks guide AI deployment in sensitive
domains such as healthcare and surveillance (
). It also
highlights the importance of equipping professionals
with the necessary tools and knowledge to effectively
manage sustainability goals in an evolving technological
landscape (
7.2 Process of Implementation
The implementation process was initiated by
deploying the required hardware and software on-site.
The material shipments also had embedded RFID tags,
allowing the material to be automatically identified and
tracked once it was delivered to the supplier level. Site
supervisors were employed to check incoming materials
using handheld scanners. Conversely, a smart meter
mechanism was also installed on major construction
equipment at the sites, including concrete mixers and
cranes, to record real-time energy consumption. On the
software front, the carbon dashboard platform would be
hosted on a cloud server, making it remotely available
and integrating real-time information. The APIs were
also linked to the procurement system on the site to
accept delivery schedules, and the processing engine on
the dashboard had been customized to utilize the
emission factors within the ICE database and the locally
available Environmental Product Declarations. The
interface between the physical devices, cloud storage,
and the visualization interface in Grafana was enabled
by data pipelines created using Node-RED.
Site managers, procurement officers, and equipment
operators underwent training sessions (
). Those
sessions focused on the topics of scanning tagged
materials, interpreting dashboard metrics, and
understanding how to respond to real-time alerts. The
training materials were made more straightforward and
incorporated into the toolbox meetings daily to help
reinforce knowledge. A significant amount of attention
was devoted to stakeholder engagement. This was
achieved through weekly meetings with project
consultants and sustainability auditors to review and
gather feedback on improving system performance.
As illustrated in the Figure below, the highest focus
(25%) was placed on hardware installation, including
RFID tagging and smart meter deployment on
construction machinery. This was followed closely by
training sessions for site staff (20%) and software
integration efforts (20%), which encompassed setting up
cloud-hosted dashboards and linking APIs with
procurement systems.
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
56
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Figure 6: Key Components in the Implementation Process of the Carbon Dashboard
7.3 Results and Observations
The dashboard started to give a good insight into the
embodied emissions of the site after two weeks of its
implementation. The logs, conducted in real-time,
contributed to the percentage of emissions that the
project was expected to produce during its duration. An
unusual and sharp increase was observed at the time of
pouring the foundation slab when the use of readymade
concrete and non-stop operation of the machines were
considerable. The alert system was one of the most
convenient characteristics that were found during the
pilot. For example, an entry from a supplier located
more than 400 kilometers away was received, indicating
a batch of steel rebar despite the existence of a supplier
closer to the location. Consequently, the dashboard
raised an alert concerning excessive transport
emissions. This prompted the procurement team to
adjust their buying strategy, resulting in reduced
emissions from future deliveries.
The second notable finding was the change in behavior
among the site personnel (
). This increases awareness
of material choices and the amount of fuel used, as all
emissions are visible and tracked weekly in reviews.
Operators of machinery, for example, began to reduce
idle time after noticing spikes in energy and emissions
on their dashboards. Within four weeks, smart meter
records demonstrated that the emission rate of
equipment-related emissions was 12 percent lower than
the base. In brief, the pilot case demonstrated that the
carbon dashboard was capable of displaying real-time
embodied emissions and aiding decision-making during
the active construction process. The quality of the
system, in terms of accuracy, ease, and ability to identify
inefficiencies, proved very useful to project managers
and sustainability personnel. The experiences and
lessons learned during the pilot inform the
enhancement of the dashboard and the intention to
extend it to other construction projects and material-
intensive industries.
The figure below illustrates the weekly trend in
embodied emissions over the four-week pilot period.
Notably, a peak was recorded in Week 1 during the
pouring of the foundation slab. The subsequent decline
demonstrates the behavioral and strategic adjustments
prompted by the dashboard alerts, particularly in terms
of fuel consumption and procurement practices.
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
57
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Figure 7: weekly trend in embodied emissions over the four-week pilot period
8. Challenges and Limitations
8.1 Data Quality and Completeness
The quality and completeness of the emission data are
also critical challenges in carrying out a real-time carbon
dashboard. Embodied carbon calculation relies
significantly on accurate, well-defined input data,
including the material type, its source, manufacturing
cycle, and transportation mode. However, on numerous
occasions, the required data can be incomplete,
outdated, or lacking coherence. The information
summarized in Environmental Product Declarations
(EPDs) is helpful, but not all materials and
manufacturers have them. The quality of EPDs may also
vary, even when they exist, depending on the method
and assumptions used to collect them, as well as the
degree of validation.
The other concern has been the reliability of the real-
time data that sensors are expected to gather (
Calibration of the sensors is also crucial in accurately
recording equipment usage, fuel consumption, and
delivery time. Failure to maintain or calibrate the
sensors regularly can lead to error-ridden emissions
calculations based on data gathered by the sensors. To
illustrate, consider a smart meter that misinterprets the
energy consumption of a generator, potentially
underreporting the site's emissions by a significant
amount, which may give an incorrect impression of the
site's performance. Additionally, information gaps can
arise due to network connections, power interruptions,
or device failures, particularly at distant construction
sites. Unless rectified by redundancy or data recovery
methods, these disturbances can compromise the
integrity of the emissions logs and reduce certainty in
the dashboard results.
8.2 Connection to the Legacy Systems
There is yet another significant limitation stemming
from the fact that numerous problems arise from
connecting the dashboard with other tools involved in
the enterprise. The combination of multiple software
systems in place to procure, manage projects, utilize
building information modeling (BIM), or report is already
part of many organizations. They are frequently
independent systems constructed based on other data
structures and formats. This presents some obstacles to
the free flow of data, requiring custom integration or the
use of middleware to bridge the gaps.
Data silos can hinder the full benefits of real-time carbon
tracking. To illustrate, when the procurement system is
unable to transmit real-time delivery records to the
dashboard, emissions cannot be automatically recorded
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
58
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
upon receipt of the material. Similarly, when the project
scheduling software and the emission engine cannot
communicate with each other, it is necessary to
establish a connection for emissions. The action
between them developed with sustainability integration
in mind. The creation of standardized data formats and
API compatibility can be costly and likely requires the
assistance of numerous vendors to accomplish. Such
integration difficulties can impede implementation and
possibly restrict or constrain the capability or scope of
the carbon dashboard during its initial implementation.
As depicted in Figure 8, which outlines major IoT
application domains, carbon dashboards must operate
across a complex technological ecosystem that includes
procurement tools, project management software,
Building
Information Modeling
(BIM)
systems,
enterprise resource planning (ERP) platforms, and
various reporting frameworks.
Figure 8: Important IoT application domains.
8.3 Scalability and Cost
Scalability is another area of concern, particularly in the
increasing use of dashboards across multiple projects or
sectors (
). Although cloud application types offer
flexibility to support extensive amounts of information
and large user numbers in their applications, the very
implementation of sensors, meters, and scanning
devices is nonetheless strenuous and resource-
demanding. The price of acquiring, installing, tallying,
and maintaining them can prove to be a stumbling block
towards their mass use. The problem is particularly
topical for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs),
which may lack the funds and technological expertise to
maintain a high-level IoT infrastructure. Many small to
medium-sized companies use spreadsheets or manual
solutions to track materials, and an upgrade to a data-
driven, real-time system may be considered too
complicated or costly. The return on investment (RoI) of
carbon dashboards is likely to be long-term, with
payback depending on avoided carbon prices,
certification benefits, or a better market image. These
opportunities may not be evident to small-time actors.
The cost of subscriptions to cloud services, dashboard
analytics services, and access to trusted carbon
databases can also contribute to operational expenses.
Smaller companies may not be able to afford
implementation without funding or incentives, as well as
without the presence of open-source alternatives.
Although real-time carbon dashboards may be
beneficial, they are also limited in several ways. These
issues include data accuracy and availability, integration
challenges with existing systems, and financial and
technical barriers that can limit scalability. It will be
crucial to address these issues, as carbon-tracking
technologies should gain more widespread adoption
and continue to bring success to those industries in the
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
59
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
long term.
9. Benefits and Impacts
9.1 Enhanced Decision-Making
Among the most significant advantages of a real-time
carbon dashboard is that it facilitates in-depth decision-
making at various stages of a project. Historical forms of
embodied carbon measurement would often come with
slow lessons well after materials were procured or the
foundation stone was laid. Conversely, real-time
dashboards provide near real-time data on emissions,
allowing mitigation strategies to be instituted promptly
to minimize any carbon impact before it is embedded in
a project. Project managers, designers, or procurement
teams can view the current carbon footprint related to
a particular material, process, or supplier. Such visibility
encourages more sustainable choices, including the use
of lower-carbon options, more efficient material
utilization, and planning high-emission work around
other high-carbon processes to minimize overlap. By
incorporating the emission data into procurement
processes, it will be possible to identify high-emission
materials early and replace them with more sustainable
ones. Design processes enable materials and structures
to be iteratively evaluated for their carbon impacts (in
advance of construction), facilitating optimization. The
consequences are a more effective and knowledgeable
decision-making arena, with sustainability issues
incorporated into routine operational conditions rather
than being relegated to post-hoc reporting obligations
(
As represented in Figure 9, which illustrates a general
decision-making process, the availability of live
emissions data allows sustainability to be embedded
directly into each step, from design and procurement to
scheduling and execution.
Figure 9: General decision-making process.
9.2 Transparency and Stakeholder Engagement
The use of a carbon dashboard also increases interaction
with material stakeholders, such as clients, regulators,
investors, and the general public. Enhanced carbon
reporting transparency is becoming increasingly
required in the current regulatory and market
conditions. Real-time dashboards offer a transparent
and
evidence-based
platform
for
exchanging
sustainability performance data. Clients can have real-
time visibility into the environmental developments of
their projects, which establishes trust and alignment
with their corporate sustainability objectives (
Auditors and regulators also find it helpful to have
timestamped sets of data logs to demonstrate whether
either the environmental standards or building codes
are met. Lenders and investors primarily interested in
the ecological, social, and governance (ESG) standards
can review the emissions records to assess the
sustainability of projects included in their portfolios.
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
60
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Additionally, dashboards facilitate the documentation
required for green building certifications, such as LEED,
BREEAM, and EDGE. Such certifications frequently
require precise monitoring of emissions, transparent
material procedures, and ongoing improvement reports.
The dashboard streamlines a lot of this work and
minimizes
administrative
workload,
effectively
enforcing compliance. When employed, public-facing
dashboards are also capable of fostering greater
accountability and community trust, especially in
infrastructure or publicly known sector projects.
Periodically or live reporting of embodied carbon
performance can project the image of environmental
responsibility and enhance reputational status.
9.3 Net-Zero Contribution
Embodied emissions real-time tracking is an integral
part of the bigger trend towards net-zero carbon. As
emissions created during the operations of the energy
owner decrease due to renewable energy and efficiency
gains, the embodied emissions become a bigger
percentage of the total lifecycle emissions. They now
take up more than 50 percent of the overall footprint in
some buildings. This renders embodied carbon one of
the major concerns of any genuine endeavor of carbon
neutrality. By allowing for the real-time measurement of
embodied carbon, project teams can align their
emissions trajectory with science-based targets. For
example, an increasing number of companies will now
pursue targets through the Science Based Targets
initiative (SBTi), which requires the monitoring and
minimization of both direct and indirect emissions. A
carbon dashboard helps convert these top-level
objectives into lower-level initiatives that are
measurable and quantifiable during the construction or
production process.
ESG reporting is also available on the dashboard,
enabling consistent and auditable carbon data. This is
especially relevant to companies that need to report on
carbon performance as part of the Task Force on
Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) or other
national
environmental
regulations.
Real-time
emissions data enhances the quality of reporting,
making it more timely, accurate, and meaningful.
Overall, the carbon dashboard offers a range of value-
added benefits in terms of decision-making,
transparency, compliance, and sustainability strategy. It
helps organizations make better decisions by
transforming carbon data into actionable intelligence,
enabling them to engage stakeholders with confidence
and make a valuable contribution toward global
decarbonization.
As outlined
in Table 4,
one of the most significant shifts
in recent years is the changing emissions profile of
buildings and infrastructure projects. With operational
emissions steadily decreasing due to efficiency
improvements and clean energy adoption, embodied
carbon now accounts for more than 50% of total
lifecycle emissions in many new developments
Table 4: Contribution of Real-Time Embodied Carbon Dashboards to Net-Zero Goals
Aspect
Description
Impact
Shift in Emissions
Profile
As operational emissions decrease, embodied
emissions now account for over 50% of total
lifecycle emissions
Elevates the importance of managing
embodied carbon for true carbon
neutrality
Alignment with
Science-Based
Targets
Real-time tracking allows alignment with the
Science-Based Targets initiative (SBTi)
requirements
Enables measurable, real-time control of
direct and indirect emissions during
construction
Support for ESG and
Regulatory Reporting
Dashboard provides consistent, auditable
data for frameworks like TCFD and national
regulations
Enhances quality and timeliness of
sustainability disclosures and improves
regulatory compliance
Strategic Value
Addition
Transforms carbon data into actionable
insights that support smarter decisions and
stakeholder engagement
Strengthens sustainability strategies,
transparency, and contribution to global
decarbonization
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
61
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
10. Future Work and Enhancements
10.1 Machine Learning Integration
The use of machine learning is one of the most
promising areas for improving the carbon dashboard in
the future (
). Predictive modeling can significantly
enhance the dashboard's capacity to anticipate
embodied carbon delivery by leveraging past
precedents, current information, and project variables.
These models are capable of learning the material
selections, the distances covered due to transportation,
the weather, conditions, and registration schedules to
predict future patterns of emissions. For example, if a
project frequently purchases steel from a distant source,
the system could yield greater transportation emissions
and propose nearby options or optimal delivery paths.
Machine learning can be used to detect anomalies
together with forecasting. The pattern of emissions is
well understood in certain phases of construction or
manufacturing. Any electricity operations that involve
an abrupt jump or sudden increase in carbon production
may be indicative of inaccurate resource tracking,
equipment failure, or data manipulation. Such
anomalies can be identified with the help of machine
learning and marked for subsequent analysis, thereby
enhancing data integrity and alerting managers to other
operational deficiencies or data quality issues during
administration.
As those algorithms develop, they can also supply
optimization engines that automatically suggest lower-
carbon pathways in procurement, sequencing, or
logistics applications, making the dashboard a decision
support system rather than a tool for reporting.
10.2 Data Integrity Blockchain
The technology of blockchain can also be beneficial in
another field, specifically in ensuring the integrity and
traceability of emissions data. Embodied carbon
reporting is often questioned, particularly when such
reports are used in the context of regulating a company,
such as through carbon credits or green finance.
Blockchain could provide emissions supplies with a
decentralized, immutable way of tracking them, offering
a tamper-proof record of data. This ensures that the
material supply can be traced to the delivery location
and the installation point. The system works by
recording every piece of data entered into it, such as the
delivery of materials, energy usage, or the purchase of
carbon offsets, on a blockchain ledger, ensuring that it is
collectively modified retrospectively. This enhances
trust among stakeholders and is easily verifiable
independently. The application is particularly relevant in
carbon offset and credit systems, where transparency
and verification play a crucial role in maintaining the
credibility of these systems. Moreover, to facilitate the
exchange and verification of carbon credits, the use of
blockchain within a dashboard setting is to be discussed.
An example of this would be a project that has
overcommitted its emissions reduction level; the surplus
credits may be safely tokenized and either traded or
held against future emission journeys. This lends
financial and strategic significance to the monitoring of
emissions, contributing to increased involvement in the
sustainability market.
10.3 Spreading to the Operational Emissions
Although the dashboard is designed to cover embodied
carbon, additional modules will be added later to track
operational emissions as well. These include electricity
emissions, water usage, the heating and cooling system,
and the transfer of materials throughout the building's
life cycle. Incorporating operational measurements
would enable the dashboard to become a
comprehensive carbon-monitoring tool that embraces
the whole life cycle of a compound or building. Through
connections to innovative building systems, energy
meters, and transportation management tools, the
dashboard can provide a consolidated carbon footprint
that encompasses both embodied and operational
aspects. This combined method would give a more
comprehensive overview of the overall environmental
impact and facilitate the implementation of more
detailed sustainability plans. It would also be consistent
with global systems, such as whole-life carbon
assessments, which are hemorrhaging in Europe and
elsewhere (
). This growth would enable organizations
to track their decisions throughout the design and
construction phases as they relate to long-term
sustainability performance, thereby bridging the gap
between design intent and impact.
As visualized in Figure 10, which sketches a building
designed with life-cycle sustainability in mind, this
integrated approach captures emissions not only at the
construction and procurement stages but also during
the building’s long
-term operation.
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
62
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
Figure 10: Sketch of building design for life cycle towards an integrated sustainable
11. Recommendations
To maximize the potential of real-time carbon
dashboards and encourage their widespread application
across
various
industries,
several
strategic
recommendations
can
be
provided.
Such
recommendations
encompass
technological
advancements,
industry
adoption,
regulatory
considerations, and capacity building. First, there is a
need to make additional investments in open-access and
standardized emissions databases (
). The accuracy of
embodied emissions has a significant impact on the
reliability of any real-time carbon tracking system. The
government and industry organizations should be
involved in funding and standardizing Environmental
Product Declarations (EPDs), digital material passports,
and life cycle inventory datasets to maintain consistency
and interoperability across initiatives, software, and
jurisdictions. Second, one should pay more attention to
ensuring the interoperability of dashboard developers
with available industry software. Compatibility with
procurement systems, Building Information Modeling
(BIM) models, construction project timelines, and
enterprise resource planning (ERP) software will be
seamlessly integrated into the carbon dashboard
software, enhancing its utilization and usability. Future
development should focus on open APIs, as well as
modular design and data connectors that can be used on
a plug-and-play basis.
Third, policymakers should consider real-time carbon
dashboards as tools for transparency and low-carbon
innovation. The regulatory framework and policies
towards public procurement may be revised to
introduce digital emissions tracking as a requirement or
an incentive parameter. For example, real-time carbon
reporting projects may be prioritized in approval
processes, as well as access to green finance or tax
credits. Fourth, the carbon dashboard technology
should be made more accessible to small and medium-
sized enterprises (SMEs). The high cost of initial setup
and technical complexities still excludes many. Scalable
pricing strategies, shared platforms, and government-
funded pilot programs can promote inclusion and
accelerate the diffusion of this technology throughout
the greater value chain. Fifth, awareness campaigns and
training should be undertaken to develop internal
capacity
among
construction
professionals,
procurement officers, sustainability managers, and data
analysts. The best dashboard cannot be effective
without users connected to knowledge, enabling them
to make informed decisions based on the presented
information. Curricula and short courses on real-time
carbon management tools should be developed in
industry associations, universities, and certification
bodies.
Synergy among the private sector, academic
institutions, and governmental agencies plays a crucial
role in ongoing improvement (
). Collaborative
research initiatives, pilot projects, and information-
sharing sessions can set the pace of innovation and
ensure that real-time carbon dashboards adapt to real-
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
63
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
life demands and emerging environmental objectives.
Overall, although the technical basis for real-time
embodied carbon tracking already exists, there is still
much to be done in terms of strategic action regarding
policy, technology, finance, and education to realize its
full potential. When aligned, carbon dashboards will be
essential to mainstreaming carbon accountability and
realizing global sustainability goals.
12. CONCLUSION
The carbon dashboard featured in this article represents
a significant step forward in sustainability tracking, as it
enables real-time monitoring of embodied emissions.
This dashboard is different because it offers a dynamic
and responsive, data-intensive platform compared to
conventional approaches involving static reports and
unresponsive feedback. This system provides resilient
support for industries such as construction and
manufacturing by integrating technologies from the
Internet of Things (IoT), Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), and
advanced data visualization, offering users a
comprehensive solution for measuring embodied
carbon.
The dashboard features include timestamped emission
logging, automated notifications, custom dashboards,
and the ability to build predictive analytics, all of which
provide users with the tools they need to react to carbon
information throughout the lifecycle of a project. The
pilot implementation not only demonstrated the
system's technical feasibility but also its practical
usefulness. It identified quantifiable changes in
emissions awareness, purchase planning, and overall
carbon performance, which support the dashboard's
potential to influence low-carbon project delivery.
The carbon dashboard has a powerful material
application in the specialty areas of policy, industry, and
investment, whereas it is not as applicable in technical
contributions. It provides policymakers with the
transparency and integrity of data they need to sustain
regulatory compliance and track performance against
emissions caps, serving as the basis for programs such as
carbon pricing and trading schemes. It empowers
science-based enforcement of policy and performance-
related incentives by supporting verifiable real-time
reporting modality.
The dashboard enables companies in industrial
environments to achieve sustainability standards,
mitigate risks, and enhance competitiveness. It offers
practical information that can be used to guide material
selection, logistics planning, and partnership among
contractors, designers, and clients. Due to the growing
importance of environmental responsibility as a core
component in client expectations and contractual
relationships, having a system that promotes the
visibility and traceability of carbon information is a
strategic benefit. In the context of ESG investors and
financial institutions, the dashboard enhances due
diligence activities. It provides a reliable source of their
emissions data, enabling them to continually evaluate
their performance and inform investment decisions in
green businesses. Real-time carbon dashboards are not
merely a technological advancement; they are a catalyst
for change within the system. These tools enhance
sustainability beyond a compliance practice by
incorporating environmental decision criteria into day-
to-day business operations. They enable project teams
to act wisely, be more transparent with stakeholders,
and play a significant role in achieving joint climate
goals. In the future, the direction of embodied carbon
management will be closely tied to the launch of more
accessible, timely, and actionable data. As technologies
continue to be further developed, positive policy
frameworks and close stakeholder partnerships are
expanded, making the real-time carbon dashboard a
common practice in carbon-intensive industries,
bringing objectively measurable improvements in the
direction of a more sustainable and resilient built
environment.
REFERENCES
1.
Akbarnezhad, A., & Xiao, J. (2017). Estimation and
minimization of embodied carbon of buildings: A
review.
Buildings
,
7
(1),
5.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings7010005
2.
AlAbdulaali, A., Asif, A., Khatoon, S., & Alshamari, M.
(2022). Designing multimodal interactive dashboard
of disaster management systems.
Sensors
,
22
(11),
4292.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s22114292
3.
Ali, M., Alqahtani, A., Jones, M. W., & Xie, X. (2019).
Clustering and classification for time series data in
visual analytics: A survey.
IEEE Access
,
7
, 181314-
181338.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2958551
4.
Bathaei, A. (2024). Agile Supply Chains: A
Comprehensive Review of Strategies and Practices
for Sustainable Business Operations.
Journal of
Social, management and tourism letter
,
2024
, 1-13.
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
64
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
5.
Beckett, R. C. (2015). Functional system maps as
boundary
objects
in
complex
system
development.
International Journal of Agile Systems
and Management
,
8
(1), 53-69.
6.
Borra, P. (2024). Comparison and analysis of leading
cloud service providers (AWS, Azure and
GCP).
International Journal of Advanced Research in
Engineering and Technology (IJARET) Volume
,
15
,
266-278.
https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4914145
7.
Chavan, A. (2022). Importance of identifying and
establishing context boundaries while migrating
from monolith to microservices. Journal of
Engineering and Applied Sciences Technology, 4,
E168.
http://doi.org/10.47363/JEAST/2022(4)E168
8.
Chavan, A. (2024). Fault-tolerant event-driven
systems: Techniques and best practices. Journal of
Engineering and Applied Sciences Technology, 6,
E167.
http://doi.org/10.47363/JEAST/2024(6)E167
9.
Clark, L. T., Watkins, L., Piña, I. L., Elmer, M.,
Akinboboye, O., Gorham, M., ... & Regnante, J. M.
(2019). Increasing diversity in clinical trials:
overcoming critical barriers.
Current problems in
cardiology
,
44
(5),
148-172.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2018.11.002
10.
Coito, T., Firme, B., Martins, M. S., Vieira, S. M.,
Figueiredo, J., & Sousa, J. M. (2021). Intelligent
sensors
for
real-Time
decision-
making.
Automation
,
2
(2),
62-82.
https://doi.org/10.3390/automation2020004
11.
Crespo, A. M. (2015). Systemic facts: Toward
institutional awareness in criminal courts.
Harv. L.
Rev.
,
129
, 2049.
12.
Dhanagari, M. R. (2024). MongoDB and data
consistency: Bridging the gap between performance
and reliability.
Journal of Computer Science and
Technology
Studies,
6
(2),
183-198.
https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.2.21
13.
Dhanagari, M. R. (2024). Scaling with MongoDB:
Solutions for handling big data in real-time.
Journal
of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 6
(5),
246-264.
https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2024.6.5.20
14.
Dolatabadi, S. H., Gatial, E., Budinská, I., & Balogh, Z.
(2024,
July).
Integrating
human-computer
interaction principles in user-centered dashboard
design: Insights from maintenance management.
In
2024 IEEE 28th International Conference on
Intelligent Engineering Systems (INES)
(pp. 000219-
000224). IEEE.
15.
Goel, G., & Bhramhabhatt, R. (2024). Dual sourcing
strategies.
International Journal of Science and
Research
Archive
,
13(2),
2155.
https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.13.2.2155
16.
Jarkas, A. M., & Haupt, T. C. (2015). Major
construction risk factors considered by general
contractors in Qatar.
Journal of Engineering, Design
and
Technology
,
13
(1),
165-194.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-03-2014-0012
17.
Karwa, K. (2024). The future of work for industrial
and product designers: Preparing students for AI
and automation trends. Identifying the skills and
knowledge that will be critical for future-proofing
design careers.
International Journal of Advanced
Research in Engineering and Technology
,
15
(5).
https://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/
IJARET/VOLUME_15_ISSUE_5/IJARET_15_05_011.p
df
18.
Katapally, T. R., & Ibrahim, S. T. (2023). Digital health
dashboards for decision-making to enable rapid
responses during public health crises: replicable and
scalable
methodology.
JMIR
Research
Protocols
,
12
(1),
e46810.
19.
Konneru, N. M. K. (2021). Integrating security into
CI/CD pipelines: A DevSecOps approach with SAST,
DAST, and SCA tools.
International Journal of Science
and
Research
Archive
.
Retrieved
from
https://ijsra.net/content/role-notification-
scheduling-improving-patient
20.
Kumar, A. (2019). The convergence of predictive
analytics in driving business intelligence and
enhancing DevOps efficiency. International Journal
of Computational Engineering and Management,
6(6), 118-142. Retrieved from
21.
Marx, A. (2019). Public-private partnerships for
sustainable development: Exploring their design and
its impact on effectiveness.
Sustainability
,
11
(4),
1087.
The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research
65
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajiir
22.
Moncaster, A. M., & Song, J. Y. (2012). A
comparative review of existing data and
methodologies for calculating embodied energy and
carbon of buildings.
International Journal of
Sustainable Building Technology and Urban
Development
,
3
(1),
26-36.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2093761X.2012.673915
23.
Nyati, S. (2018). Transforming telematics in fleet
management: Innovations in asset tracking,
efficiency, and communication. International
Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 7(10), 1804-
1810.
Retrieved
from
https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR2
4203184230
24.
Ojadi, J. O., Onukwulu, E., Odionu, C., & Owulade, O.
(2023). Leveraging IoT and deep learning for real-
time carbon footprint monitoring and optimization
in
smart
cities
and
industrial
zones.
IRE
Journals
,
6
(11),
946-964.
25.
Olatomiwa, L., Ambafi, J. G., Dauda, U. S., Longe, O.
M., Jack, K. E., Ayoade, I. A., ... & Sanusi, A. K. (2023).
A review of Internet of Things-based visualisation
platforms
for
tracking
household
carbon
footprints.
Sustainability
,
15
(20),
15016.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su152015016
26.
Raju, R. K. (2017). Dynamic memory inference
network
for
natural
language
inference.
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR),
6(2).
https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v6i2/SR24926091431.
pdf
27.
Sardana, J. (2022). The role of notification
scheduling in improving patient outcomes.
International Journal of Science and Research
Archive
.
Retrieved
from
https://ijsra.net/content/role-notification-
scheduling-improving-patient
28.
Singh, V. (2022). Advanced generative models for 3D
multi-object scene generation: Exploring the use of
cutting-edge generative models like diffusion
models to synthesize complex 3D environments.
https://doi.org/10.47363/JAICC/2022(1)E224
29.
Singh, V. (2024). Ethical considerations in deploying
AI systems in public domains: Addressing the ethical
challenges of using AI in areas like surveillance and
healthcare.
Turkish Journal of Computer and
Mathematics
Education
(TURCOMAT)
.
https://turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/
view/14959
30.
Spil, N. A., van Nieuwenhuizen, K. E., Rowe, R.,
Thornton, J. G., Murphy, E., Verheijen, E., ... &
Heazell, A. E. (2024). The carbon footprint of
different modes of birth in the UK and the
Netherlands: An exploratory study using life cycle
assessment.
BJOG: An International Journal of
Obstetrics
&
Gynaecology
,
131
(5),
568-578.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17771
31.
Stecyk, A., & Miciuła, I. (2023). Empowering
sustainable energy solutions through real-time data,
visualization, and fuzzy logic.
Energies
,
16
(21), 7451.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16217451
32.
Sukhadiya, J., Pandya, H., & Singh, V. (2018).
Comparison
of
Image
Captioning
Methods.
INTERNATIONAL
JOURNAL
OF
ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH
,
6
(4),
43-48.
https://rjwave.org/ijedr/papers/IJEDR1804011.pdf
33.
Williams, A. J., Grulke, C. M., Edwards, J.,
McEachran, A. D., Mansouri, K., Baker, N. C., ... &
Richard, A. M. (2017). The CompTox Chemistry
Dashboard: a community data resource for
environmental
chemistry.
Journal
of
cheminformatics
,
9
,
1-27.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13321-
017-0247-6
34.
Xu, J., & MacAskill, K. (2024). Carbon data and its
requirements
in
infrastructure-related
GHG
standards.
Environmental Science & Policy
,
162
,
103935.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103935
