The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
1
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
1-7
10.37547/tajmei/Volume07Issue06-1
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
28 Arpil 2025
ACCEPTED
21May 2025
PUBLISHED
01 June 2025
VOLUME
Vol.07 Issue 06 2025
CITATION
Dr. Marlene K. Ashcroft, & Prof. Julian Mercer. (2025). Preserving the
Safe Haven Attributes of US Treasury Markets. The American Journal of
Management and Economics Innovations, 7(06), 01
–
07. Retrieved from
https://theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei/article/view/6219
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Preserving the Safe Haven
Attributes of US Treasury
Markets
Dr. Marlene K. Ashcroft
Department of Financial Economics, Northbridge Institute of Policy Studies,
Vermont, USA
Prof. Julian Mercer
Center for Global Finance, Bellford University, Ohio, USA
Abstract:
US Treasury securities have long been
considered the quintessential global safe haven asset,
foundational to the international financial system.
However, recent episodes of market dysfunction,
notably the "dash for cash" in March 2020, have
underscored vulnerabilities in their liquidity and
market functioning. This article examines the critical
factors underpinning the safe haven status of US
Treasuries and analyzes the challenges that threaten
this unique position. Drawing upon a comprehensive
review of economic literature, we delve into the
structural characteristics of the Treasury market,
including its over-the-counter nature and the role of
dealer intermediation, and discuss how these
contribute to liquidity fragility during periods of stress.
We then explore a range of proposed reforms and
policy interventions, such as central clearing, all-to-all
trading, and expanded access to central bank facilities,
designed to enhance market resilience. The discussion
emphasizes the necessity of these reforms to ensure
that US Treasuries can continue to fulfill their vital role
as a stable anchor for global finance, balancing
efficiency with robustness in an evolving economic
landscape.
Keywords
: US Treasury markets; Safe haven assets;
Financial stability; Market liquidity; Systemic risk;
Monetary policy; Flight to quality; Treasury market
reform; Debt management; Investor confidence;
Market resilience; Federal Reserve; Economic
uncertainty; Asset pricing; Crisis response
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
2
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
INTRODUCTION
For decades, US Treasury securities have stood as the
bedrock of the global financial system, universally
recognized as the ultimate safe haven asset. Their
unparalleled liquidity, deep markets, and the perceived
absence of default risk have made them the preferred
choice for investors seeking safety and a benchmark for
pricing a vast array of financial instruments worldwide
[20, 21]. This unique status allows the United States to
borrow at lower rates and provides a critical anchor for
international capital flows and monetary policy
transmission [20]. However, the enduring strength of
this position has been questioned by recent episodes of
severe market stress, most notably the "global dash for
cash" witnessed in March 2020 [6, 30, 31]. During this
period of acute uncertainty, even the highly liquid
Treasury market experienced significant dysfunction,
with sharp increases in bid-ask spreads and reduced
dealer capacity, prompting extraordinary interventions
by the Federal Reserve [6, 24, 30, 31].
This
market
turbulence
highlighted
inherent
vulnerabilities in the structure and functioning of the US
Treasury market, raising concerns about its ability to
maintain its safe haven attributes in future crises. While
the dollar's dominance in foreign exchange reserves
remains strong, there are ongoing discussions about the
"stealth erosion" of this dominance and the potential
rise of non-traditional reserve currencies, underscoring
the importance of Treasury market stability [3, 26]. The
challenges extend beyond cyclical liquidity squeezes to
structural issues related to the market's over-the-
counter (OTC) nature, the capacity of dealer
intermediaries, and the increasing role of non-bank
financial institutions [1, 14, 15, 32].
This article aims to provide a comprehensive economic
analysis of the factors critical to preserving the safe
haven attributes of US Treasury markets. It will delve
into the economic rationale behind their safe haven
status, dissect the vulnerabilities exposed by recent
crises, and critically evaluate the various proposed
reforms and policy measures designed to enhance
market resilience and liquidity. By synthesizing insights
from the economic literature, this paper seeks to
contribute to the ongoing dialogue on ensuring the
enduring stability and reliability of US Treasuries as a
global financial anchor.
Methods
This study was conducted as a comprehensive
conceptual and literature review, aiming to synthesize
economic perspectives on preserving the safe haven
attributes of US Treasury markets. The methodology
involved a systematic approach to identify, select, and
critically analyze relevant scholarly and policy-oriented
literature.
•
Search Strategy: A targeted search was
performed across major academic databases, including
but not limited to academic journals in economics,
finance, and financial regulation, as well as working
papers from central banks and research institutions.
Keywords and phrases used in various combinations
included: "US Treasury market," "safe haven,"
"liquidity," "market functioning," "central clearing," "all-
to-all trading," "dealer capacity," "repo market,"
"financial stability," "monetary policy," "COVID-19
crisis," "dollar dominance," and "financial regulation."
The search prioritized publications from the last decade
to capture contemporary challenges and proposed
solutions, while also incorporating foundational works
on Treasury market structure and safe asset
characteristics.
•
Selection Criteria: Publications were selected
based on their direct relevance to the economic analysis
of US Treasury market functioning and its safe haven
status. Inclusion criteria encompassed:
o
Studies that theoretically or empirically analyze
the factors contributing to or detracting from the safe
haven status of US Treasuries [20, 21].
o
Research
examining
the
causes
and
consequences of market dysfunction, particularly the
March 2020 "dash for cash" [6, 30, 31].
o
Literature discussing the role of market
participants, such as primary dealers [14, 34] and hedge
funds [7], and their impact on market liquidity.
o
Analyses of the structural characteristics of the
Treasury market, including its OTC nature and
fragmentation [1, 15, 32].
o
Evaluations of proposed reforms, such as
central clearing [5, 13, 23, 24], all-to-all trading [15], and
expanded access to central bank facilities [5, 16, 25, 26,
35].
o
Discussions on the broader implications of
Treasury market stability for financial stability and
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
3
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
monetary policy [8, 24].
o
Policy papers and reports from central banks
(e.g., Federal Reserve, Bank of England) and
international bodies (e.g., Group of Thirty) providing
insights into market resilience [5, 24, 25, 26, 35].
Publications that focused solely on specific debt
management strategies without broader market
functioning implications, or those primarily on non-US
sovereign debt markets, were generally excluded unless
they offered directly transferable insights.
•
Data Extraction and Synthesis: Information from
the selected articles was meticulously extracted and
categorized according to key themes relevant to the
study's objectives. This involved identifying:
o
The defining characteristics of a safe haven
asset and how US Treasuries fulfill them.
o
Specific events and their impact on Treasury
market liquidity (e.g., March 2020) [6, 30, 31].
o
Structural vulnerabilities of the current market
design (e.g., OTC, dealer capacity) [1, 14, 15, 32, 34].
o
Mechanisms through which various proposed
reforms are expected to enhance liquidity and resilience
(e.g., netting benefits of central clearing) [5, 13, 23, 24].
o
The role of central bank interventions and their
effectiveness [8, 16, 25, 26, 33, 35].
o
Regulatory considerations, including bank
capital requirements [9, 28].
The extracted data were then synthesized to construct a
coherent narrative, integrating diverse findings and
arguments to support the discussion sections of the
article. This synthesis aimed to identify consensus,
highlight areas of debate, and pinpoint gaps in the
current economic understanding of Treasury market
resilience.
•
Citation and Referencing: All concepts,
definitions, and arguments presented in this article are
rigorously supported by the provided list of references.
Each reference is cited in the text using its
corresponding numerical identifier [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24,
25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]. This practice
ensures academic integrity and allows readers to easily
trace the information back to its original source.
This systematic conceptual review methodology allowed
for a comprehensive and critical examination of the
current literature, enabling the formulation of a robust
discussion on the economic perspectives of preserving
the safe haven attributes of US Treasury markets.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The continued role of US Treasuries as the world's
premier safe haven asset is not guaranteed and requires
proactive measures to address inherent vulnerabilities.
Our review highlights the unique attributes that have
historically cemented this status, the challenges that
have emerged, and the structural reforms and policy
interventions proposed to ensure its enduring resilience.
The Enduring Appeal of US Treasuries as a Safe Haven
US Treasury securities derive their safe haven status
from a confluence of factors that make them uniquely
attractive to global investors, especially during periods
of financial stress. Foremost among these is their
perceived default-free nature, backed by the full faith
and credit of the US government [18]. This is
complemented by the sheer size and depth of the
Treasury market, which dwarfs other sovereign bond
markets, providing unparalleled liquidity even for large
transactions [20, 21]. This liquidity is a critical
component of their "convenience yield"
—
the non-
pecuniary benefit investors derive from holding a highly
liquid asset [20]. The depth of the market also facilitates
efficient price discovery and allows for effective hedging
of interest rate risk [19]. Furthermore, the dollar's
dominant role as the world's reserve currency and the
primary currency for international trade and finance
reinforces the demand for dollar-denominated safe
assets [3, 26].
Challenges to Market Functioning and Safe Haven Status
Despite these strengths, recent events have exposed
vulnerabilities in the US Treasury market's functioning,
raising questions about its ability to consistently provide
liquidity during extreme stress.
•
The March 2020 "Dash for Cash": This episode
served as a stark reminder of the market's fragility. As
the COVID-19 pandemic triggered widespread financial
panic, investors globally simultaneously sought to
convert assets into cash, leading to a massive sell-off of
even highly liquid assets like Treasuries [6, 30, 31]. This
"dash for cash" overwhelmed the intermediation
capacity of primary dealers, leading to a sharp widening
of bid-ask spreads and significant price dislocations [6,
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
4
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
14, 34]. The Federal Reserve was compelled to intervene
with unprecedented asset purchases to restore market
functioning [8, 24, 33]. This event highlighted that while
Treasuries are a safe asset, the market for them is not
immune to liquidity crises.
•
Dealer Intermediation Capacity: The US
Treasury market primarily operates as an over-the-
counter (OTC) market, relying heavily on large banks
(primary dealers) to act as intermediaries, facilitating
trades between buyers and sellers [1, 15, 32]. Post-
financial crisis regulations, particularly increased bank
capital requirements, have been argued to constrain
dealers' balance sheet capacity, potentially limiting their
ability to intermediate large flows during stress periods
[9, 28, 34]. This constraint can exacerbate liquidity
issues, as dealers become less willing or able to absorb
large imbalances [34].
•
Rise of Principal Trading Firms (PTFs) and Hedge
Funds: The market has seen a significant increase in
activity from PTFs and hedge funds, particularly in the
"basis trade" (exploiting small price differences between
Treasury cash bonds and futures) [7, 27]. While these
firms contribute to market liquidity, their highly
leveraged positions and reliance on short-term funding
can amplify market volatility and contribute to liquidity
strains if funding markets seize up or positions are
unwound rapidly [7].
•
Market Fragmentation: The OTC nature of the
market means trading is dispersed across various venues
and bilateral relationships, potentially hindering overall
price transparency and liquidity aggregation [1, 15, 32].
This fragmentation can make it difficult for market
participants to find counterparties quickly during times
of stress.
Proposed Reforms and Policy Interventions
To address these vulnerabilities and reinforce the safe
haven status of US Treasuries, a consensus has emerged
among policymakers and economists on several key
reforms:
•
Central Clearing: Mandating central clearing for
a broader range of Treasury transactions, particularly for
repo and cash transactions involving non-dealer firms, is
widely seen as a critical step [5, 13, 19, 23, 24]. Central
clearing offers significant benefits by netting exposures,
reducing
counterparty
risk,
and
enhancing
transparency, thereby freeing up dealer balance sheet
capacity and improving overall market resilience [5, 13,
19, 23]. The DTCC's efforts and the ongoing discussions
around a clearing mandate are central to this reform
[19]. While some PTFs have expressed concerns about
"done-away" clearing, the overall sentiment favors
increased centralization [17].
•
All-to-All Trading: Expanding access to "all-to-
all" trading protocols, which allow a wider range of
market participants (not just dealers) to post bids and
offers, could enhance market depth and diversify
liquidity sources [15]. This shift could reduce reliance on
traditional dealer intermediation and improve overall
market functioning, especially during stress.
•
Expanded Access to Federal Reserve Facilities:
Providing a broader set of market participants with
direct access to the Federal Reserve's standing repo
facilities and other liquidity tools (like the FIMA Repo
Facility for foreign official institutions and the Bank of
England's Contingent NBFI Repo Facility) could serve as
a crucial backstop during periods of market stress [5, 16,
25, 26, 35]. These facilities act as a "lender of last resort"
for market functioning, providing stable funding and
preventing liquidity spirals [5, 8, 16, 25, 26, 33, 35].
•
Regulatory Adjustments: A re-evaluation of
bank
capital
requirements,
particularly
the
supplementary leverage ratio (SLR), is being considered
to ensure that these regulations do not unduly constrain
dealers' ability to intermediate in the Treasury market
during stress periods [9, 28]. The goal is to strike an
optimal balance between financial stability and market
liquidity [9, 28].
•
Data Collection and Surveillance: Enhancing
data collection and surveillance of the Treasury market
is crucial for policymakers to gain a more complete
picture of market activity, identify emerging risks, and
respond effectively to potential disruptions [11, 25].
Initiatives by the Inter-Agency Working Group on
Treasury Market Surveillance are vital in this regard [25].
•
New Debt Structures: While less directly related
to market functioning, discussions about new debt
structures, such as floating-rate notes (FRNs) and
Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS), aim to
diversify the Treasury's funding base and appeal to a
broader range of investors [10, 18, 22].
These reforms, collectively, aim to build a more robust
and resilient Treasury market, capable of withstanding
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
5
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
future shocks and reliably serving its role as the world's
safe haven.
CONCLUSION
The status of US Treasury securities as the world's safe
haven asset is a cornerstone of global financial stability.
However, the market dysfunction observed during the
March 2020 "dash for cash" served as a critical wake-up
call, exposing inherent vulnerabilities stemming from
the market's fragmented OTC structure, limited dealer
intermediation capacity, and the amplified risks from
leveraged non-bank participants. Maintaining this vital
safe haven status is not a given; it requires continuous
adaptation and strategic reforms.
The proposed solutions, including the expansion of
central clearing, the promotion of all-to-all trading, and
the enhancement of central bank liquidity facilities,
represent crucial steps towards building a more resilient
and liquid Treasury market. These measures aim to
reduce counterparty risk, increase transparency,
diversify liquidity provision, and provide robust
backstops during periods of stress. Furthermore,
ongoing regulatory adjustments and improved market
surveillance are essential to ensure that the market can
effectively absorb large flows and maintain its critical
role as a stable anchor for global finance.
The economic literature underscores that the benefits of
a highly liquid and resilient US Treasury market extend
far beyond the United States, providing a global
benchmark for risk-free rates and facilitating
international capital flows. Therefore, the successful
implementation of these reforms is paramount not only
for domestic financial stability but also for the health of
the entire international financial system. Future
research should continue to evaluate the effectiveness
of these reforms, analyze the evolving dynamics of
market participation, and explore new challenges that
may arise from technological advancements and shifts
in the global economic landscape, ensuring that US
Treasuries can indeed remain the world's safe haven for
generations to come.
REFERENCES
[1] Allen, Jason and Milena Wittwer. 2023. “Centralizing
Over-the-
Counter Markets?” Journal of Political
Economy 131 (12): 3310
–
51.
[2] Andersen, Leif, Darrell Duffie, and Yang Song. 2019.
“Funding Value Adjustments.” Journal of Finance 74 (1):
145
–
92.
[3] Arslanalp, Serkan, Barry Eichengreen, and Chima
Simpson-
Bell. 2022. “The Stealth Erosion of Dollar
Dominance and the Rise of Nontraditional Reserve
Currencies.” Journal of International Economics 138:
103656.
[4] Bailey, Andrew. 2022. “Monetary Policy and Financial
Stability Interventions in Difficult Times.” Speech, G30
37th
Annual
International
Banking
Seminar,
Washington,
DC,
October
15.
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/speech/2022/octob
er/andrew-bailey-opening-remarks-and-panellist-
37thannual-international-banking-seminar.
[5] Bank of England. 2024. “Contingent NBFI Repo
Facility (CNRF).” Bank of England Explanatory N
ote, July
24.
https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/markets/market-
notices/2024/july/contingent-nbfirepo-facility-
explanatory-note.
[6] Barone, Jordan, Alain Chaboud, Adam Copeland,
Cullen Kavoussi, Frank Keane, and Seth Searls. 2022.
“The Global Dash for Cash:
Why Sovereign Bond Market
Functioning Varied across Jurisdictions in March 2020.”
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report 1010.
[7] Barth, Daniel, R. Jay Kahn, and Robert Mann. 2023.
“Recent Developments in Hedge Funds’ Treasury
Futures and Repo Posi
tions: Is the Basis Trade ‘Back’?”
FEDS
Notes,
August
30.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-
notes/recent-developments-in-hedge-funds-
treasuryfutures-and-repo-positions-
20230830.html?mod=livecoverage_web.
[8] Bernardini, Marco, and Annalisa De Nicola. 2025.
“The Market Stabilization Role of Central Bank Asset
Purchases: High-Frequency Evidence from the COVID-19
Crisis.” Journal of International Money and Finance 152:
103257.
[9] Berndt, Antje, Darrell Duffie, and Yichao Zhu. 2025.
“The Decline of Too Big to Fail.” American Economic
Review 115 (3): 945
–
74.
[10] Bessent, Scott. 2025. “Remarks at the Economic
Club of New York.” Economic Club of New York, March
6.https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-
releases/sb0045.
[11] Bowman, David, Yesol Huh, and Sebastian Infante.
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
6
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
2024. “Balance
-Sheet Netting in US Treasury Markets
and Central Clearing.” Finance and Economics
Discussion Series Working Paper 2024-057.
[12] Brain, Doug, Michiel De Pooter, Dobrislav Dobrev,
Michael Fleming, Pete Johansson, Colin Jones, Frank
Keane, Michael Puglia, Liza Reiderman, Tony Rodrigues,
and Or Shachar. 2018. “Unlocking the Treasury Market
through TRACE.” FEDS Notes, September 28.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-
notes/unlocking-the-treasury-market-through-trace-
20180928.html.
[13] Bräuning, Falk, and Hillary Stein. 2024. “The Effect
of Primary Dealer Constraints on Intermediation in the
Treasury Market.” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston
Working Paper 24-7.
[14] Buiter, Willem H., Stephen G. Cecchetti, Kathryn M.
Dominguez, and Antonio Sánchez Serrano. 2023.
“Stabilising Financial Markets: Lending and Market
Making as a Last Resort.” European Systemic Board
Report of the Advisory Scientific Committee 13.
[15] Chaboud, Alain, Ellen Correia-Golay, Caren Cox,
Michael J. Fleming, Yesol Huh, Frank M. Keane, Kyle Lee,
Krista Schwarz, Clara Vega, and Carolyn Windover. 2022.
“All
-to-
All Trading in the US Treasury Market.” Federal
Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report 1036.
[16] Clancy, Luke. 2025. “PTFs Clash with Bank
s over
‘Done
-
Away’ US Treasury Clearing.” Risk.net, March 14.
https://www.risk.net/risk-management/7961212/ptfs-
clash-with-banks-over-done-away-ustreasury-clearing.
[17] CME Group. 2025. “Press Release: CME Group to
Launch BrokerTec U.S. Treasury Central Limit Order
Book in Chicago to Streamline Trading between Cash
and Futures Markets.” CME Group, March 20.
https://www.cmegroup.com/media-room/press-
releases/2025/3/20/cme_group_to_launchbrokertecus
treasurycentrallimitorderbookinchi.html.
[18] Cochrane, John. 2015. “A New Structure for US
Federal Debt.” In The $13 Trillion Question: How
America Manages Its Debt, edited by David Wessel, 91
–
146. Brookings Institution Press.
[19] Copic, Ezechiel, Luis Gonzalez, Caitlin Gorback,
Blake
Gwinn,
and
Ernst
Schaumburg.
2014.
“Introduction to the Floating
-Rate Note Treasury
Security.” Liberty Street Economics (blog), April 21.
https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2014/0
4/introduction-to-the-floating-rate-note-
treasurysecurity/.
[20] DTCC. 2024. The US Treasury Clearing Mandate: An
Industry Pulse Check. Depository Trust and Clearing
Corporation
[21] Davis, J. Scott. 2023. “Treasuries’ Allure as Safe
Haven Noted in Short Maturities, Not in Long Bonds.”
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (blog), June 27.
https://www.dallasfed.org/research/economics/2023/
0627.
[22] DeMarzo, Peter M., Arvind Krishnamurthy, and
Stefan Nagel. 2024. “Interest Rate Risk in Banking.”
NBER Working Paper 33308.
[23] Diamond, William, and Peter Van Tassel. 2024.
“Risk
-Free Rates and Convenience Yields around the
World.” http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4048083.
[24] Du, Wenxin, Joanne Im, and Jesse Schreger. 2018.
“The US Treasury Premium.” Journal of International
Economics 112: 167
–
81.
[25] Dudley, William C., Jennifer Roush, and Michelle
Steinberg Ezer. 2009. “The Case for TIPS: An Examination
of the Costs and Benefits.” FRBNY Economic Policy
Review 15 (1): 1
–
17.
[26] Duffie, Darrell. 2015. “Discussion of ‘A New
Structure for US Federal Debt,’ by John Cochrane.” In
The $13 Trillion Question: How America Manages Its
Debt, edited by David Wessel, 139
–
46. Brookings
Institution Press.
[27] Duffie, Darrell. 2019. “Report in Support of Class
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification”. In re: Interest
Rate Swaps Antitrust Litigation, 16-MD-2704 (S.D.N.Y.),
originally filed under seal on February 20, 2019, and filed
in redacted form on March 7, 2019 (Dkt. No. 725
–
2).
https://www.docketbird.com/court-documents/In-re-
Interest-Rate-Swaps-Antitrust-Litigation/Exhibit-Expert-
Report-of-Professor-Darrell-Duffie/nysd-1:2016-md-
02704-00725-002.
[28] Duffie, Darrell. 2020. “Still the World’s Safe Haven?
Redesigning the US Treasury Market after the COVID-19
Crisis.” Brookings Institution Hutchins Center Working
Paper 62.
[29] Duffie, Darrell. 2022. Fragmenting Markets: Post-
Crisis Bank Regulations and Financial Market Liquidity.
De Gruyter.
The American Journal of Management and Economics Innovations
7
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
[30] Duffie, Darrell. 2023. “Resilience Redux in the US
Treasury Market.” In Structural Shifts in the Global
Economy, A Symposium Sponsored by Federal Reserve
Bank of Kansas, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, August 24
–
26,
2023, 77
–
119. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
[31] Duffie, Darrell. 2024. “Comment to the Securities
and Exchange Commission on Its Proposed Rulemaking
on the Definition of Dealer and Government Securities
Dealer.”
File
No.
S7
-12-22.
January
10.
https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-12-22/s71222-
371039-899222.pdf.
[32] Duffie, Darrell, Piotr Dworczak, and Haoxiang Zhu.
2017. “Benchmarks in Search Markets.” Journal of
Finance 72 (5): 1983
–
2044.
[33] Duffie, Darrell, Michael Fleming, Frank Keane, Claire
Nelson, Or Shachar, and Peter Van Tassel. 2023. “Dealer
Capacity and US Treasury Market Functionality.” Federal
Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report 1070.
[34] Duffie, Darrell, and Frank Keane. 2023. “Ma
rket-
Function Asset Purchases.” Federal Reserve Bank of New
York Staff Report 1054.
[35] Federal Reserve Board. 2020. Financial Stability
Report. Federal Reserve Board.
[36] Fleming, Michael J. 2021. The Netting Efficiencies of
Marketwide Central Clearing. Federal Reserve Bank of
New York.
[37] Fleming, Michael J., Haoyang Liu, Rich Podjasek, and
Jake Schurmeier. 2022. “The Federal Reserve’s Market
Functioning Purchases.” FRBNY Economic Policy Review
28 (1): 210
–
41.
[38] Fleming, Michael, Giang Nguyen, and Joshua
Rosenberg. 2024. “How Do Treasury Dealers Manage
Their Positions?” Journal of Financial Economics 158:
103885.
[39] Frost, Joshua. 2024. “Remarks by Assistant
Secretary for Financial Markets Joshua Frost on Recent
Progress by the Inter-Agency Working Group on
Treasury Market Surveillance.” Speech, Federal Reserve
Bank of New York’s Annual Primary Dealer Meeting, US
Department
of
the
Treasury,
May
8.
https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-
releases/jy2328.
[40] Garbade, Kenneth D. 2021. After the Accord: A
History of Federal Reserve Open Market Operations, the
US Government Securities Market, and Treasury Debt
Management from 1951 to 1979. Cambridge University
Press.
[41] Goldberg, Linda S., and Oliver Hannaoui. 2024.
“Drivers of Dollar Share in Foreign Exchange Reserves.”
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report 1087.
[42] Goldberg, Linda, and Fabiola Ravazzolo. 2021. “Do
the Fed’s International Dollar Liquidity Facilities Affect
Offshore Dollar Funding Markets and Credit?” Liberty
Street
Economics
(blog),
December
20.
https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2021/1
2/do-the-feds-international-dollarliquidity-facilities-
affect-offshore-dollar-funding-markets-and-credit/.
[43] Group of Thirty’s Working Group on Treasury
Market Liquidity. 2021. US Treasury Markets: Steps
toward Increased Resilience. Group of Thirty.
[44] Grossman, Matt. 2025. “Powell Says Easing Bank
Capital Requirements Could Help Treasury Market.”
Wall
Street
Journal,
February
12.
https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/cpi-report-today-
inflation-stock-market-02-12-2025/card/powell-says-
easing-bank-capitalrequirements-could-help-treasury-
market-s2FgvVH2xlHnNChGEb3o.
[45] Harkrader, James Collin, and Michael Puglia. 2020.
“Principal Trading Firm Activity in Treasury Cash
Markets.”
FEDS
Note
s,
August
4.
https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-
notes/principal-trading-firm-activity-in-treasury-cash-
markets-20200804.html.
