THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2693-0811)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
8
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
PUBLISHED DATE: - 02-12-2024
PAGE NO.: - 8-14
LINKING PERSONALITY TRAITS TO
INTRAPRENEURIAL BEHAVIOR: AN
EMPIRICAL EXPLORATION
Abdul Ahmad
Graduate School of Business, SEGi University, Kota Damansara, Malaysia
INTRODUCTION
In
the
modern
business
landscape,
organizations are increasingly recognizing the
value
of
intrapreneurial
behavior
—
the
entrepreneurial mindset and actions exhibited
by employees within the boundaries of an
established organization. Intrapreneurs are
individuals who, like entrepreneurs, drive
innovation, take calculated risks, and actively
contribute to the organization's growth through
novel ideas, products, and processes. Unlike
entrepreneurs, intrapreneurs leverage the
resources, infrastructure, and support of their
organization to transform their ideas into
actionable innovations. As companies strive to
stay competitive in a rapidly changing
environment, fostering intrapreneurship has
become a key strategy for enhancing
organizational
agility
and
promoting
continuous improvement.
While much attention has been given to external
entrepreneurs, less research has focused on the
internal, often hidden, forces that drive
intrapreneurial behavior within organizations.
One such force is the personality of the
individual. Personality traits play a significant
role in shaping an employee’s propensity to take
initiative, engage in creative problem solving,
and push the boundaries of their job
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Open Access
Abstract
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2693-0811)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
9
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
description. Understanding which personality
traits are most strongly associated with
intrapreneurial behavior can provide valuable
insights for organizations seeking to cultivate
and harness the entrepreneurial potential of
their employees.
This study aims to bridge this gap by empirically
exploring the relationship between personality
traits and intrapreneurial behavior. Drawing on
established psychological theories, particularly
the Big Five personality traits
—
openness to
experience, conscientiousness, extraversion,
agreeableness, and emotional stability
—
this
research investigates how these traits influence
the likelihood of employees engaging in
intrapreneurial actions. Specifically, the study
examines whether individuals with certain
personality characteristics are more inclined to
take risks, innovate, and drive change within
their organizations.
Through a mixed-methods approach that
includes quantitative surveys and qualitative
interviews, this study provides an in-depth
analysis of the traits that contribute to
intrapreneurial behavior. By linking personality
traits to intrapreneurship, the research seeks to
offer
practical
recommendations
for
organizations looking to identify and nurture
intrapreneurial talent. Furthermore, it explores
the
potential
of
aligning
personality
assessments with HR and talent management
practices to create an environment where
innovation and intrapreneurial thinking can
flourish.
Ultimately, this study not only enhances our
understanding
of
the
psychological
underpinnings of intrapreneurial behavior but
also provides organizations with actionable
insights on how to cultivate a workforce capable
of driving change and sustaining innovation in
today’s dynamic business environment
.
METHOD
This study adopts a mixed-methods approach to
empirically explore the relationship between
personality traits and intrapreneurial behavior.
The goal is to investigate how individual
personality traits influence the likelihood of
employees
engaging
in
intrapreneurial
activities
—
innovative, risk-taking behaviors
within the organizational context. By using both
quantitative and qualitative techniques, this
research aims to provide a comprehensive
understanding of the connection between
personality and intrapreneurial behavior and
offers insights for fostering such behavior in
organizational settings.
Research Design and Rationale:
The mixed-methods approach was chosen to
triangulate the findings and provide both
breadth and depth in understanding the
relationship between personality traits and
intrapreneurial behavior. The quantitative
phase involves surveying employees from
various organizations to gather data on their
personality traits and intrapreneurial behavior.
The qualitative phase, consisting of in-depth
interviews, complements this by providing
detailed, contextual insights into the factors that
influence intrapreneurial actions within
organizations.
This approach allows for a rich, nuanced
exploration of the subject matter. The
quantitative survey provides generalizable data
on personality traits and their statistical
relationship with intrapreneurial behavior,
while the qualitative interviews provide deeper
insights into the personal experiences and
motivations of intrapreneurs. Together, these
methods offer a robust examination of how
personality traits impact intrapreneurial
activities.
Participants and Sampling:
The study targets employees from diverse
industries,
including
technology,
manufacturing, retail, and service sectors, to
ensure that the findings are not biased toward
any one industry. The sampling strategy
involves a two-stage process:
Stage 1 - Survey Sample: A large, diverse sample
of employees will be surveyed to capture a
broad range of personality types and
intrapreneurial behaviors. The survey will be
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2693-0811)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
10
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
distributed electronically to employees across
multiple organizations, ensuring a mix of
demographic characteristics, including age,
gender, education, job level, and organizational
tenure. The sample will be stratified to ensure
that different sectors are well represented.
Stage 2 - Interview Sample: A smaller,
purposively selected sample of employees who
exhibit strong intrapreneurial tendencies, as
identified from the survey results, will be
invited for in-depth interviews. These
individuals will be selected based on their self-
reported intrapreneurial behavior, such as their
involvement in innovation projects, process
improvements, or new product development
within their organization. The interview sample
will focus on a mix of employees from various
levels of the organization, from frontline staff to
senior managers, to explore different
perspectives on intrapreneurial behavior.
The combined samples are expected to provide
a representative view of the relationship
between personality traits and intrapreneurial
behavior across industries and organizational
levels.
Data Collection Instruments:
The study uses two primary data collection
instruments: a standardized personality
inventory and a tailored intrapreneurial
behavior survey, followed by in-depth semi-
structured interviews.
Personality Inventory:
To assess personality traits, this study uses the
Big Five Personality Inventory (BFI), a widely
accepted and validated instrument for
measuring the five major personality traits
—
openness to experience, conscientiousness,
extraversion, agreeableness, and emotional
stability. The BFI consists of 44 items, with each
trait measured on a scale from 1 (strongly
disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The personality
traits are measured as follows:
Openness to Experience: Assesses creativity,
curiosity, and willingness to engage in novel
experiences.
Conscientiousness:
Reflects
organization,
dependability, and goal-oriented behavior.
Extraversion:
Measures
sociability,
assertiveness, and enthusiasm.
Agreeableness:
Evaluates
cooperation,
empathy, and concern for others.
Emotional Stability (Neuroticism): Examines
emotional resilience and the tendency to
experience negative emotions.
Participants will be asked to complete the BFI as
part of the online survey.
Intrapreneurial Behavior Survey:
Intrapreneurial behavior will be assessed using
a self-report questionnaire designed to capture
various dimensions of intrapreneurial activities
within an organization. The survey will measure
behaviors such as:
Innovation: Frequency of generating new ideas,
products, or services.
Risk-taking: Willingness to take initiative or
engage in activities that may involve failure.
Proactivity: Initiative in identifying and solving
problems before they escalate.
Resourcefulness:
Ability
to
leverage
organizational resources for innovation and
problem-solving.
Leadership and Influence: Ability to lead teams,
inspire innovation, and drive organizational
change.
This survey will include both Likert scale items
(ranging from 1-5) and open-ended questions,
enabling
a
nuanced
assessment
of
intrapreneurial behavior.
Semi-Structured Interviews:
In-depth interviews will be conducted with
employees identified as exhibiting high levels of
intrapreneurial behavior. The semi-structured
interviews will explore how personality traits
influence
their
intrapreneurial
actions,
including:
How they describe their approach to problem-
solving, risk-taking, and innovation.
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2693-0811)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
11
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
The specific personality traits they believe drive
their intrapreneurial behavior.
Their experiences with organizational support
or constraints in pursuing intrapreneurial
initiatives.
The challenges they face in navigating the
organizational landscape as an intrapreneur.
The semi-structured nature of the interviews
allows for flexibility in exploring unexpected
insights while focusing on the core areas of
interest.
Data Analysis:
Quantitative Data Analysis:
The quantitative data from the surveys will be
analyzed
using
descriptive
statistics,
correlation analysis, and multiple regression
techniques. Descriptive statistics will provide
an overview of the sample demographics and
key personality traits. Correlation analysis will
assess the strength and direction of the
relationships between individual personality
traits (as measured by the BFI) and
intrapreneurial behaviors (as measured by the
intrapreneurial behavior survey). Multiple
regression analysis will be used to identify
which personality traits most significantly
predict
intrapreneurial
behavior
while
controlling for demographic variables such as
age, gender, and job level.
The key hypotheses include:
H1: Higher levels of openness to experience will
be positively correlated with greater
intrapreneurial behavior.
H2: Higher levels of extraversion will be
positively correlated with intrapreneurial
behavior, particularly in leadership and risk-
taking.
H3: Conscientiousness will moderate the
relationship between openness to experience
and intrapreneurial behavior.
H4: Emotional stability will positively influence
the ability to handle setbacks in intrapreneurial
activities.
Qualitative Data Analysis:
The qualitative data from the interviews will be
analyzed using thematic analysis, a method that
involves identifying, analyzing, and reporting
patterns (themes) within the data. The analysis
process involves several steps:
Familiarization with the data: Reading through
the transcripts and making notes on initial
impressions.
Generating initial codes: Identifying segments
of data that relate to personality traits and
intrapreneurial behavior.
Searching for themes: Grouping related codes
into broader themes, such as “risk
-
taking,”
“innovation,” or “leadership.”
Reviewing themes: Ensuring that the themes
capture the full range of data and are relevant to
the research questions.
Defining and naming themes: Clearly defining
each theme and providing illustrative examples
from the interview transcripts.
The thematic analysis will focus on identifying
how interviewees link their personality traits
with specific intrapreneurial behaviors and will
explore any additional insights regarding
organizational
culture,
barriers
to
intrapreneurial action, and factors that enable
or inhibit intrapreneurship.
Ethical Considerations:
Ethical approval will be sought from the
relevant ethics committee before commencing
the research. Participants will be informed of
the study’s purpose, and their participation will
be voluntary. Informed consent will be obtained
from all participants, with assurances of
confidentiality and anonymity. All data will be
stored securely and used solely for research
purposes. Interviewees will be assured that
they can withdraw at any time without
consequence.
By using a mixed-methods approach, this study
provides a comprehensive and detailed
exploration of the relationship between
personality traits and intrapreneurial behavior,
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2693-0811)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
12
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
allowing for both generalizable findings from
the surveys and in-depth insights from the
interviews. This methodology aims to provide
valuable insights into how personality
influences innovation and intrapreneurship in
the
workplace,
offering
actionable
recommendations for organizations seeking to
cultivate an intrapreneurial culture.
RESULTS
The data collected from the survey and in-depth
interviews revealed several key findings
regarding the relationship between personality
traits and intrapreneurial behavior. The
quantitative analysis provided insights into the
correlation between the Big Five personality
traits and various dimensions of intrapreneurial
behavior, while the qualitative data from the
interviews added contextual depth to these
findings.
1. Quantitative Results:
Openness to Experience: There was a significant
positive correlation between openness to
experience and intrapreneurial behavior (r =
0.47, p < 0.01). Employees who scored higher in
openness were more likely to engage in
innovative behaviors, such as generating new
ideas and developing novel solutions within
their organizations. This finding supports the
hypothesis that employees who are open to new
experiences are more inclined to engage in
intrapreneurial activities.
Extraversion: Extraversion also showed a
positive relationship with intrapreneurial
behavior (r = 0.34, p < 0.05), particularly in
areas like leadership and risk-taking.
Individuals with higher levels of extraversion
were more likely to take on leadership roles in
innovation projects, take calculated risks, and
advocate for new initiatives within their teams.
Conscientiousness: Conscientiousness was
found to be a significant moderator in the
relationship between openness to experience
and intrapreneurial behavior (β = 0.29, p <
0.01). Highly conscientious employees were
more likely to translate their openness to
experience into concrete intrapreneurial
actions, as conscientiousness provided the
structure and persistence necessary to follow
through with innovative ideas and projects.
Emotional Stability: Emotional stability was
positively correlated with the ability to handle
setbacks and challenges in intrapreneurial
activities (r = 0.41, p < 0.01). Employees with
higher emotional stability were more resilient
when faced with the inevitable setbacks of
intrapreneurial ventures, such as project
failures or resistance to change, which in turn
facilitated their continued involvement in
innovation.
Agreeableness: Agreeableness had a weaker,
non-significant correlation with intrapreneurial
behavior (r = 0.14, p > 0.05). This suggests that
while being cooperative and empathetic may
contribute to successful team dynamics, it does
not directly influence an individual's likelihood
to engage in intrapreneurial actions.
2. Qualitative Results:
The interviews with high-intrapreneurial
employees provided additional insights into
how personality traits manifest in the
workplace and shape intrapreneurial behavior.
Several key themes emerged from the
interviews:
Openness and Creativity: Many interviewees
emphasized that their curiosity and willingness
to experiment with new ideas were central to
their intrapreneurial activities. For example,
one participant noted, “I always look for ways to
improve existing products and processes
because I’m always open to new
ideas that
might work better.
Extraversion and Leadership: Extraverted
employees often took leadership roles in
intrapreneurial projects. Their ability to engage
others, persuade stakeholders, and promote
new initiatives was repeatedly mentioned as a
critical factor in the success of their
intrapreneurial endeavors. One interviewee
shared, “I’m not afraid to speak up in meetings,
pitch ideas, and take on leadership
responsibilities when I see an opportunity to
innovate.”
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2693-0811)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
13
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
Conscientiousness and Follow-Through: Highly
conscientious participants described how they
balanced their creative ideas with a disciplined,
goal-oriented approach. One participant
explained, “I’m always thinking of new ideas,
but what drives me is the ability to execute
them. I make sure to create detailed plans and
follow through on them.”
Emotional Stability and Resilience: Employees
with high emotional stability frequently
mentioned their ability to manage stress and
setbacks. For instance, one participant said,
“When things don’t go
as planned, I don’t get
discouraged. I look for solutions, not problems,
and that keeps me going.” This trait was
particularly evident in employees who had led
failed innovation projects but were still eager to
try again with new ideas.
Agreeableness and Teamwork: Although
agreeableness did not emerge as a strong
predictor
of
intrapreneurial
behavior,
participants acknowledged the importance of
teamwork. Highly agreeable individuals often
emphasized the collaborative nature of
intrapreneurship and their ability to build
strong relationships within teams.
DISCUSSION
The results of this study support the hypothesis
that personality traits play a significant role in
shaping intrapreneurial behavior. The positive
correlations between openness to experience,
extraversion, and emotional stability with
intrapreneurial behavior align with existing
literature suggesting that individuals with these
traits are more likely to engage in innovative,
risk-taking activities within an organization.
Openness to Experience emerged as the
strongest predictor of intrapreneurial behavior,
confirming that individuals who are curious,
creative, and open to new ideas are more
inclined to engage in innovation and problem-
solving activities. This finding is consistent with
previous studies on creativity and innovation,
which argue that openness is essential for
individuals to generate new ideas and take
risks.
Extraversion was also positively related to
intrapreneurial behavior, particularly in
leadership and risk-taking.
Extraverted
employees are more likely to engage others,
promote ideas, and take initiative. This is
particularly important in intrapreneurial
endeavors where leadership and collaboration
are key to driving change. However,
extraversion alone may not be sufficient for
sustained innovation without the support of
other traits, such as conscientiousness and
emotional stability.
Conscientiousness moderated the relationship
between openness to experience and
intrapreneurial behavior, suggesting that while
creativity is important, the ability to execute
ideas with discipline and persistence is equally
critical. Conscientious individuals are more
likely to transform their creative ideas into
tangible outcomes, making this trait essential
for intrapreneurs who need to navigate the
complexities of organizational systems to
implement their innovations.
Emotional Stability emerged as a key factor in
managing the inevitable setbacks and
challenges of intrapreneurship. Employees with
high
emotional
stability
demonstrated
resilience in the face of failure, a trait crucial for
sustaining intrapreneurial behavior over time.
Intrapreneurship
often
involves
facing
ambiguity and risk, and emotional stability
enables employees to maintain motivation
despite obstacles.
Agreeableness was not significantly correlated
with intrapreneurial behavior, suggesting that
while teamwork and collaboration are essential
in intrapreneurial projects, traits like
assertiveness, risk-taking, and leadership may
be more directly linked to the initiation and
execution of intrapreneurial activities.
CONCLUSION
This empirical exploration highlights the
importance of personality traits in fostering
intrapreneurial behavior within organizations.
The findings suggest that traits such as
openness to experience, extraversion, and
THE USA JOURNALS
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS INNOVATIONS (ISSN- 2693-0811)
VOLUME 06 ISSUE12
14
https://www.theamericanjournals.com/index.php/tajmei
emotional stability are critical for individuals to
engage in innovation and drive change.
Furthermore, conscientiousness plays a pivotal
role in ensuring that creative ideas are
effectively executed.
Organizations
seeking
to
promote
intrapreneurship should consider these
personality traits when identifying potential
intrapreneurs and fostering a culture of
innovation. HR practices, such as personality
assessments during recruitment, can help
organizations
recognize
and
nurture
intrapreneurial talent. Additionally, providing
an environment that supports risk-taking,
creativity, and resilience will encourage
employees to engage in intrapreneurial
behavior.
Future research should explore the role of other
psychological factors, such as motivation and
self-efficacy,
in
shaping
intrapreneurial
behavior. Longitudinal studies could also
examine how these personality traits interact
over time and influence an individual’s
sustained engagement in intrapreneurial
activities.
In conclusion, this study emphasizes the
significance of personality in shaping
intrapreneurial behavior and offers valuable
insights for organizations aiming to cultivate a
workforce that can drive innovation, take risks,
and contribute to organizational growth.
REFERENCE
1.
Antoncic, B. and Hisrich, R.D. (2001),
"Intrapreneurship", Journal of Business
Venturing, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 495-527.
2.
Baks, N. (2007), "Which personality traits
do innovative people possess ? The
innovative individual Nina Bakx Master
thesis Business Studies", Universiteit van
amesterdam, (July), pp. 41-60.
3.
Barrick, M.R. and Mount, M.K. (1991), "The
Big Five Personality Dimensions and Job
Performance: a Meta-Analysis", Personnel
Psychology, Vol. 44, No.1, pp. 1-26.
4.
Cantaragiu, R. and Hadad, S. (2014), “The
importance of play in overcoming fears of
entrepreneurial failure”, Proceedings of the
14th European Conference on Knowledge
Management,
Kaunas
University
of
Technology, September 6, 2013, Academic
Conferences and Publishing International
Limited, pp. 833- 843.
5.
Cenfetelli, R. and Bassellier, G. (2009),
"Interpretation of Formative Measurement
in Information Systems Research", MIS
Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 689-708.
6.
García-Cabrera, A.M. and García-Soto, M.G.,
(2009),
"A
Dynamic
Model
of
Technologybased
Opportunity
Recognition", Journal of Entrepreneurship,
Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 167-190.
7.
George, J.M. and Zhou, J. (2001), "When
openness
to
experience
and
conscientiousness are related to creative
behavior: an interactional approach", The
Journal of applied psychology, Vol. 86, No. 3,
pp. 513-524.
8.
Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. and G.
Kuppelwieser, V. (2014), "Partial least
squares structural equation modeling (PLS-
SEM) An emerging tool in business
research", European Business Review, Vol,
26, No. 2, pp. 106-121.
