The USA Journals Volume 03 Issue 05-2021
117
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
(ISSN
–
2693-0803)
Published:
May 31, 2021 |
Pages:
117-120
Doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue05-18
I
MPACT
F
ACTOR
2021:
5.
952
‘
ABSTRACT
This article analyzes the theoretical aspect of criminal liability for intentional homicide, one of the types
of aggravated homicide, with extreme cruelty.
KEYWORDS
Crime, extreme cruelty, premeditated murder, method of committing a crime, close relative.
INTRODUCTION
One of the great blessings bestowed on man is
his life, and the care and protection of his
inviolability is the focus of all legal institutions
of the state, judicial and investigative bodies. In
addition, the function of criminal law is to
protect the individual, his rights and freedoms.
Among the crimes against the person in the
Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan,
the crime of premeditated murder has a special
significance.
Criminal Liability For Premeditated Murder With Extreme
Cruelty
Xazratov Sardor
Tashkent State University Of Law Theory And Practice Of The Application Of Criminal Law
Specialty Student, Uzbekistan
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
The USA Journals Volume 03 Issue 05-2021
118
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
(ISSN
–
2693-0803)
Published:
May 31, 2021 |
Pages:
117-120
Doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue05-18
I
MPACT
F
ACTOR
2021:
5.
952
The second part of Article 97 of the Criminal
Code establishes liability for intentional
homicide in aggravating circumstances.
Homicide with extreme cruelty is understood
as the killing of a victim by means of extreme
torture or the killing of a person in other
circumstances
that
indicate
that
the
perpetrator was subjected to extreme cruelty.
According to the Plenum of the Supreme Court
of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the most brutal
methods of murder, including torture or severe
torture of the victim before death or during the
murder (use of strong painkillers, burning alive,
prolonged eating) , no water) can also be
added. Killing a person by inflicting multiple
bodily injuries can only be assessed as a
manifestation of extreme cruelty if the
perpetrator has done so with the right
intention to inflict severe suffering on the
victim.
It should be noted that the fact that multiple
bodily injuries were inflicted does not in itself
constitute grounds for classifying the act as
extreme cruelty.
Murder in the eyes of the victim's relatives
should be viewed as an indication of extreme
cruelty on the part of the perpetrator if the
perpetrator realizes that he or she is inflicting
severe suffering on them by his or her actions.
Close relatives of the victim, in addition to his
close relatives, may include persons who have
a special personal friendship with the victim. It
is important to note once again that inflicting
multiple bodily injuries on a victim is not a basis
for finding that the murder was committed
with extreme cruelty, as the existence of this
sign indicates that the murder was committed
with extreme intent and the victim was
intentionally separated before death. it is
necessary to determine whether he was
tortured or severely tortured.
Extremely brutal forms of homicide are
considered to have ended with the death of
the victim. Therefore, any subsequent actions
of the perpetrator, such as desecration of the
corpse, dismemberment, dismemberment in
order to conceal the murder, are not part of the
type of murder under consideration and are
not considered evidence of brutal murder.
The crime was committed by the Criminal Code
in such cases it should be qualified in
accordance with Article 97 and Article 134 of
the Criminal Code, as the destruction or
dismemberment of a corpse for the purpose of
concealment of murder cannot be regarded as
a circumstance indicating that the murder was
committed with extreme cruelty.
The saliva of the murder in question is in most
cases committed with direct intent, and in rare
cases with crooked intent. To find that the
crime of murder was committed with extreme
cruelty, it is important to determine whether
the perpetrator has intentional homicide with
extreme cruelty.
In the absence of prior agreement between the
participants in the crime of premeditated
murder, the actions of the perpetrator are
punishable under Article 97 (2) (j) of the
Criminal Code, and the actions of other
participants are punishable under Article 97 of
the Criminal Code. With the exception of
paragraph "j" of Part 2, shall be qualified under
the relevant part of this Article.
Extreme cruelty is a sign of a person’s cruelty,
immorality. Paragraph 2 (j) of Article 97 of the
Criminal Code deals not with ordinary cruelty,
The USA Journals Volume 03 Issue 05-2021
119
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
(ISSN
–
2693-0803)
Published:
May 31, 2021 |
Pages:
117-120
Doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue05-18
I
MPACT
F
ACTOR
2021:
5.
952
but with extreme cruelty. Murder is always
brutal. In what ways is extreme cruelty
manifested? It manifests itself primarily in the
manner in which the crime is committed.
Homicide with extreme cruelty is understood
as the killing of a victim by extreme torture or
the killing of a victim in other circumstances
indicating that he or she has been subjected to
extreme cruelty.
As stated in the decision of the Plenum of the
Supreme Court of the Republic of Uzbekistan,
in qualifying the crime of premeditated murder
under paragraph "j" of the second part of
Article 97 of the CC, it is necessary to determine
whether the intention of the perpetrator was
intentional. At this point, it should be borne in
mind that the law connects the notion of
extreme cruelty not only with the method of
murder, but also with other circumstances
which indicate that the perpetrator has
committed extreme cruelty.
Extremely brutal methods of killing may
include torture or severe torture of a victim
before death or during a homicide (use of
severe
pain
poisoning,
burning
alive,
prolonged food, water deprivation). Killing a
person by inflicting multiple bodily injuries can
only be assessed as a manifestation of extreme
cruelty if the perpetrator has done so with the
right intention to inflict severe suffering on the
victim. Murder in the eyes of the victim's
relatives should be regarded as an indication of
extreme cruelty on the part of the perpetrator
if the perpetrator realizes that he or she is
inflicting severe suffering on them by his or her
actions.
REFERENCES
1.
Ўзбекистон Республикаси олий суди
Пленумининг
2004
йил
24
сентябрдаги
"
Қ
асддан
одам
ўлдиришга оид ишлар бўйича суд
амалиёти
тў
ғ
рисида"ги
13-сонли
қ
арори // Ўзбекистон Республикаси
олий
суди
Пленуми
қ
арорлари
тўплами. - 1991 - 2006, 2-жилд. - Т.:
"Ў
қ
итувчи", 2007.
2.
Кругликов Л.Л. Жизнь человека как
объект уголовно-правовой охраны
(понятие и некоторые вопросы
квалификации). // Уголовно-правовая
охрана личности и ее оптимизация:
Научно-практ. конф., посв. памяти
проф. А.Н. Красикова (20-21 марта
2003 г.) / Под ред. Б.Т. Разгильдиева.
– Саратов: Изд-во ГОУ ВПО «Сарат.
гос. академия права», 2003.
3.
Уразалиев М. К. EТКAЗИЛГAН ЗAРAР
Қ
OПЛAНГAНДA ЖAВOБГAРЛИКДAН
OЗOД
Қ
ИЛИШНИНГ XУCУCИЯТЛAРИ
//ЖУРНАЛ
ПРАВОВЫХ
ИССЛЕДОВАНИЙ. – 2020. – Т. 5. – №.
12.
4.
Уразалиев М. ЭВОЛЮЦИЯ РАЗВИТИЯ
УГОЛОВНОГО ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
В
СФЕРЕ
ПРОТИВОДЕЙСТВИЯ
КОМПЬЮТЕРНОЙ
ПРЕСТУПНОСТИ
//Review of law sciences. – 2020. – Т. 2.
– №. Спецвыпуск.
5.
Уразалиев
М.
ВОПРОСЫ
КРИМИНАЛИЗАЦИИ ОБЩЕСТВА В
УСЛОВИЯХ
ПАНДЕМИИ–НОВЫЕ
УГРОЗЫ И ВЫЗОВЫ //Review of law
sciences. – 2020. – №. 2.
6.
Уразалиев М. Зўрликка нисбатан
қ
ўлланадиган олдини олиш таъсир
чораларининг ўрни ва а
ҳ
амияти
The USA Journals Volume 03 Issue 05-2021
120
The American Journal of Political Science Law and Criminology
(ISSN
–
2693-0803)
Published:
May 31, 2021 |
Pages:
117-120
Doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/Volume03Issue05-18
I
MPACT
F
ACTOR
2021:
5.
952
//Общество и инновации. – 2020. – Т.
2. – №. 1/S. – С. 236-243.
7.
Уразалиев М. Мажбурий ижро
тизимини такомиллатириш-суд-
ҳ
у
қ
у
қ
со
ҳ
асидаги
устувор
вазифа
//Общество и инновации. – 2021. – Т. 2.
– №. 1. – С. 37-43.
8.
Allanova A. A., Kaustav C. A
Comparative Study Of The Economic
Crime In Uzbekistan And India: A
Critical Analysis //The American Journal
of
Political
Science
Law
and
Criminology. – 2021. – Т. 3. – №. 04. – С.
73-78.
9.
Алланова Азиза Антисоциальное
поведение несовершеннолетнего –
объективный признак преступления в
виде вовлечения в действия // Review
of law sciences. 2020. №Спецвыпуск.
URL:
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/antiso
tsialnoe-povedenie-
nesovershennoletnego-obektivnyy-
priznak-prestupleniya-v-vide-
vovlecheniya-v-deystviya
(дата
обращения: 25.05.2021).
10.
Салаев
Н.
С.
Государственная
пенитенциарная
политика
на
современном
этапе
развития:
попытка нового осмысления цели
наказания
и
его
исполнения
//Уголовно-исполнительное право. –
2017. – Т. 12. – №. 2.
11.
Салаев Н. С. К вопросу о влиянии
историко-философских, социально-
экономических
факторов
на
реализацию задач государственной
пенитенциарной политики //Вестник
Московского
государственного
областного университета. Серия:
Юриспруденция. – 2018. – №. 4.
