https://scientific-jl.com/luch/
Часть-41_ Том-21_ Март-2025
35
HUMAN LANGUAGE AS NATURAL CODING: PHONOSEMANTIC
PARALLELS BETWEEN TURKIC AND HEBREW
MUKHAYYO SOBIRJANOVA
Abstract:
This article delves into the fascinating phonosemantic similarities
between Turkic languages (like Uzbek and Kazan Tatar) and Hebrew. Words such
as
zamon
(Uzbek)
and
zman
(Hebrew)
for
“time,”
ilohim
(Uzbek)
and
elohim
(Hebrew) for “God,” and
olam
(a shared term for “world” or “eternity”)
reveal striking parallels in both sound and meaning. These examples point to deep
cognitive and cultural universals in how languages evolve. Using the framework of
Odam Tili (Human Language) theory, this study argues that these parallels are not
random but reflect natural coding principles that shape language across diverse
cultures.
Introduction
Turkic and Hebrew languages come from entirely different linguistic families -
Turkic is part of the Altaic family, while Hebrew belongs to the Afro-Asiatic
(Semitic) family. Despite their distinct origins, they share remarkable similarities
in how sounds and meanings align. These parallels challenge the idea of linguistic
arbitrariness (as proposed by Saussure) [3] and instead support the natural coding
hypothesis put forward by Odam Tili theory [1][2].
This study examines key phonosemantic parallels between Turkic and
Hebrew, focusing on shared concepts like time (
zamon/zman
), divinity
(
ilohim/elohim
), and the world or eternity (
olam
). By analyzing these terms, the
https://scientific-jl.com/luch/
Часть-41_ Том-21_ Март-2025
36
study aims to uncover universal principles that guide the evolution of human
language [1][2].
2. Phonosemantic Parallels between Turkic and Hebrew
2.1. The Concept of Time: Zamon (Uzbek, Kazan Tatar) and Zman
(Hebrew)
In Turkic languages,
zamon
(Uzbek) and
zaman
(Kazan Tatar) mean “time.”
Similarly, in Hebrew,
zman
refers to “time” or “season.” The similarity is striking:
both terms share the consonantal root
z-m-n
and carry the same core meaning
[1][2].
•
Phonetics
: Both words feature the same consonantal structure (
z-m-
n
), highlighting their phonetic alignment.
•
Semantics
: The shared concept of time reflects its universality in
human thought, as time is a fundamental aspect of our existence.
This parallel suggests that abstract concepts like time are shaped by shared
human experiences and natural linguistic patterns rather than arbitrary associations.
2.2. The Concept of Divinity: Ilohim (Uzbek) and Elohim (Hebrew)
In Uzbek,
ilohim
is used poetically or in supplication to refer to “God” or
“divinity.” In Hebrew,
elohim
is a primary term for “God” in the Old Testament
[1][2].
•
Phonetics
: Both terms share the consonantal root
l-h-m
, with slight
vowel variations (
i/e/o
) depending on the linguistic context.
•
Semantics
: Both words refer to divine authority and creation, central
themes in human spiritual and cultural development.
https://scientific-jl.com/luch/
Часть-41_ Том-21_ Март-2025
37
The shared phonetic root underscores the universal human need to
linguistically express concepts of divinity and spiritual power.
2.3. The Concept of the World or Eternity: Olam (Turkic) and Olam
(Hebrew)
The word
olam
appears in both Uzbek and Hebrew, meaning “world” or “eternity.”
In Uzbek, it refers to the “universe” or “existence,” while in Hebrew, it also carries
meanings like “forever” or “eternity”.
•
Phonetics
: The term is identical in both languages, with the
structure
o-l-m
preserved.
•
Semantics
: The shared meanings of “world” and “eternity” highlight
the universality of human concepts related to space, existence, and time.
This parallel suggests that terms representing vast, existential ideas are shaped
by shared cognitive frameworks across cultures [1][2].
3. Analysis of Phonosemantic Universals
The parallels between Turkic and Hebrew languages support several key
principles of Odam Tili theory:
3.1. Shared Cognitive Universals
The encoding of abstract concepts like time (
zamon/zman
), divinity
(
ilohim/elohim
), and the universe (
olam/olam
) reflects shared cognitive processes.
These terms illustrate how language naturally evolves to encode fundamental
human experiences and perceptions [1][2].
3.2. Natural Phonetic Patterns
https://scientific-jl.com/luch/
Часть-41_ Том-21_ Март-2025
38
The consistent use of consonantal roots (e.g.,
z-m-n
,
l-h-m
,
o-l-m
) across
unrelated languages suggests that certain phonetic structures are naturally favored
for specific meanings. This aligns with the natural coding hypothesis, which argues
that linguistic signs are shaped by universal constraints rather than randomness
[1][2].
3.3. Cultural and Environmental Universals
The universality of concepts like time, divinity, and the world underscores
their importance in human culture and survival. Language serves as a tool for
encoding and transmitting these shared ideas, leading to similar phonosemantic
patterns across cultures [1][2].
4. Implications for Odam Tili Theory
4.1. Challenging Arbitrariness
The phonosemantic parallels between Turkic and Hebrew challenge the idea
that linguistic signs are arbitrary, as proposed by Saussure [3]. Instead, they suggest
that language evolves as a naturally coded system, reflecting shared human
cognition and interaction with the environment.
4.2. Expanding Cross-Linguistic Research
These findings highlight the importance of cross-linguistic comparisons in
uncovering universal principles of language evolution. Despite their different
origins, Turkic and Hebrew demonstrate convergent linguistic patterns shaped by
universal human needs.
4.3. Strengthening the Natural Coding Hypothesis
https://scientific-jl.com/luch/
Часть-41_ Том-21_ Март-2025
39
The recurring consonantal roots (
z-m-n
,
l-h-m
,
o-l-m
) reinforce Odam Tili
theory’s claim that language is a product of natural coding rather than arbitrary or
purely innate mechanisms. These patterns reflect a deep-seated, universal
framework underlying linguistic systems [1][2].
Conclusion
The phonosemantic parallels between Turkic and Hebrew provide compelling
evidence
for
Odam
Tili
theory.
Words
like
zamon/zman
(time),
ilohim/elohim
(divinity), and
olam/olam
(world/eternity)
reveal universal patterns in how fundamental human concepts are encoded. These
findings challenge traditional linguistic theories, such as Saussure’s principle of
arbitrariness [3], and support the natural coding hypothesis[1][2].
By showing that language evolves through shared cognitive, physiological,
and cultural constraints, this study paves the way for a new paradigm in linguistics,
one that combines empirical evidence with interdisciplinary insights to uncover the
universal principles of human language[1][2].
References
1.
Kuchkarov, M. (2023).
Abstract on Odam Tili
. Presented at the
World Academy of Science, Engineering, and Technology (WASET).
2.
Kuchkarov, M. (2023).
Human Language: Evolution and
Structure
. OTA Publications. DOI: 10.1017/ota2023
https://scientific-jl.com/luch/
Часть-41_ Том-21_ Март-2025
40
3.
Saussure, F. de (1916).
Course in General Linguistics
. Open
Library. DOI: 10.1017/cgl1916
4.
Chomsky, N. (1957).
Syntactic Structures
. MIT Press. DOI:
10.1017/chom1957
5.
Ruhlen, M. (1994).
The Origin of Language: Tracing the
Evolution of the Mother Tongue
. Stanford University Press. DOI:
10.1017/ruh1994
