ЎЗБЕКИСТОН
ҚОНУНЧИЛИГИ
ТАҲЛИЛИ
♦
UZBEK LAW REVIEW
♦
ОБЗОР
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
2020
№
1
♦
ЎЗБЕКИСТОН
ҚОНУНЧИЛИГИ
ТАҲЛИЛИ
♦
UZBEK LAW REVIEW
♦
ОБЗОР
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
91
деган
ном
билан
юритилади
. 1999
йил
17
июнда
аъзо
давлатларнинг
Вазирликлар
даражасидаги
3-
конференциясида
унга
қўшимча
Лондон
протоколи
қабул
қилинди
ва
2005
йил
4
августда
кучга
кирди
.
Протокол
36
та
давлат
томонидан
имзоланган
ва
24
та
давлат
унинг
иштирокчиси
ҳисобланади
.
3.
Халқаро
ҳуқуқ
комиссияси
томонидан
26
йил
давомида
(1970-1997)
ишлаб
чиқилган
ва
1997
йил
21
майда
Нью
Йоркда
БМТ
Бош
Ассамблеясининг
51-
сессиясида
қабул
қилинган
.
Баъзи
манбаларда
“
Нью
Йорк
Конвенцияси
”
деб
юритилади
.
Ҳозирги
кунга
қадар
конвенцияга
35
та
давлат
давлат
томонидан
ратификация
қилиниб
кучга
кирган
. (2007
йил
4
сентябрда
Ўзбекистон
Конвенцияга
аъзо
бўлган
).
Конвенция
2003
йилдаги
қўшимча
“
Трансчегаравий
дарёларга
саноат
аварияларининг
трансчегаравий
таъсири
оқибатида
етказиладиган
зарарга
нисбатан
фуқаровий
жавобгарлик
ва
зарарни
қоплашга
оид
”
Киев
Протоколи
билан
тўлдирилди
.
4.
Зиганшина
Д
.
Р
.
О
Конвенции
ООН
по
водотокам
в
Центральной
Азии
–
текущее
положение
и
перспективы
на
будущее
//
Перспективы
применения
Конвенции
ООН
в
регионе
//
Роль
двух
глобальных
водных
конвенций
для
продвижения
интегрированного
управления
водными
ресурсами
в
Республике
Узбекистан
и
поддержания
трансграничного
сотрудничества
в
Центральной
Азии
. –
Ташкент
. 2016.
–
С
. 20.
5.
Зиганшина
Д
.
Р
.
Роль
и
уместность
Водной
Кон
-
венции
ООН
1997
года
для
стран
бассейна
Аральско
-
го
моря
//
Роль
двух
глобальных
водных
конвенций
для
продвижения
интегрированного
управления
водными
ресурсами
в
Республике
Узбекистан
и
поддержания
трансграничного
сотрудничества
в
Центральной
Азии
. –
Ташкент
. 2016. –
С
. 49.
6.
БМТ
Конвенцияси
сув
ресурсларидан
ўзаро
аҳилликда
ва
адолатли
фойдаланишга
кўмаклашади
.
«
Жаҳон
»
АА
. //
Халқ
сўзининг
19
август
2014
йилдаги
сони
http://old.xs.uz/index.php/homepage/khorizhda/item/2135
7.
Юнусов
Ҳ
.,
Мўминов
А
.
Трансчегаравий
сувлардан
фойдаланишга
оид
халқаро
-
ҳуқуқий
низоларни
ҳал
этиш
масалалари
.
Монография
. –
Т
.:
ЖИДУ
, 2017. –
Б
. 155.
8.
Ўзбекистон
Республикаси
Биринчи
Президенти
И
.
Каримовнинг
БМТ
саммити
Минг
йиллик
ривожланиш
мақсадларига
бағишланган
ялпи
мажлисдаги
нутқи
. “
Адолат
”. 2010
йил
24
сентябрь
.
9.
Юнусов
Ҳ
.
Жаҳон
иқтисодиёти
ва
дипломатия
университети
юридик
фанлари
номзоди
,
доцент
//
Марказий
Осиёда
сув
-
энергетика
муаммолари
ва
ечимлари
:
илмий
-
назарий
,
амалий
таклиф
ва
тавсиялар
.
2019
йил
10
декабрь
.
//
https://tgstat.com/ru/channel/@uzgidrouz/242
М
.
Баҳрамова
,
ТДЮУ
ўқитувчиси
АРБИТРАЖ
СУДИНИНГ
ЮРИСДИКЦИЯСИ
:
ҳозирги
юри
c
пруденция
ва
амалдаги
муаммолар
Аннотация
:
арбитраж
трибунаси
узоқ
вақтдан
бери
ўз
ваколатини
мустақил
қўллаш
имкониятига
эга
.
Уни
ажратиб
турувчи
"
ваколатли
ваколат
"
арбитраж
судларида
жуда
машҳур
.
Универсал
арбитраж
судида
вакалолатларни
тартибга
солиш
ва
тақдим
этиш
бугунги
кунда
кенг
tarqalgan.Ushbu
икки
функция
суд
ваколатлари
ўртасида
низо
ва
тушунмовчилик
келиб
чиқишининг
олдини
олади
. The Gl
о
bal C
а
vity of
C
о
mmerce
халқаро
арбитраж
тизимида
вужудга
келган
тўсқинликлар
ва
тушунмовчиликларни
ҳал
etadi.Taqsimlash
ва
танлаш
тамойиллари
жаҳон
амалиётида
бизнес
воситачилиги
манфаатларини
ҳимоя
қилишнинг
кенг
тарқалган
усулларидан
биридир
.
Калит
сўзлар
:
арбитраж
суди
,
Халқаро
арбитраж
,
"
Ваколатли
-
ваколат
", TIAC, ICSID, UNCITRAL
Модель
қонуни
, Singapore
халқаро
арбитраж
маркази
(SIAC),
Хитой
халқаро
иқтисодий
ва
савд
o
арбитражи
қўмитаси
(CIEATAC),
Халқаро
савдо
палатаси
(ICC)
ва
Лондон
халқаро
арбитраж
суди
(LIAC) ), “
лек
c
a
рбитри
”,
Нью
-
Йорк
конвенцияси
.
Аннотация
:
трибунал
имеет
возможность
выби
-
рать
свою
собственную
власть
,
которая
является
дав
-
но
приобретенной
властью
совета
.
Регулирование
различимости
и
предписание
компетентности
-
умения
-
очень
заметные
идеи
в
универсальном
арбитраже
.
Ожидается
,
что
эти
два
предложения
сохранят
страте
-
гическую
дистанцию
от
какого
-
либо
другого
юридиче
-
ского
сопротивления
,
которое
может
создать
беспоря
-
док
в
рамках
арбитража
. Global C
а
vity of C
о
mmerce
предоставила
Арбитражному
суду
место
председателя
арбитража
для
обсуждения
проблем
,
возникающих
в
системе
международного
арбитража
.
Руководящие
принципы
отличимости
и
пригодности
-
это
обычный
аппарат
,
который
в
мировой
практике
посредничества
в
бизнесе
был
принят
равным
,
чтобы
культивировать
интересы
и
последовательный
поиск
ключевых
игро
-
ков
.
Ключевые
слова
:
арбитражный
суд
,
международ
-
ный
арбитраж
,
компетенция
-
компетенция
, TIAC, ICSID,
Типовой
закон
ЮНСИТРАЛ
,
Сингапурский
междуна
-
родный
арбитражный
центр
(SIAC),
Китайский
между
-
народный
экономический
и
коммерческий
арбитраж
-
ный
комитет
(CIETAC),
Международная
торговая
пала
-
та
(ICC)
и
Лондонский
международный
арбитражный
суд
(LIAC), lex Arbitri,
Нью
-
Йоркский
договор
.
Abstract:
the Tribunal has the ability to choose its own
power, which is the council's far-acquired power. Distin-
guishableness regulation and comp
е
tence-skill precept
are very notable ideas in universal arbitr
а
tion. The two
proposition are expected to maintain a strategic distance
from some other sort of legal impedance that may create
disarray inside the arbitr
а
tion framework. The Gl
о
bal
C
а
vity of C
о
mmerce provided the Arbitral Court with a
chair of arbitration to discuss the problems posed within
the system of internati
о
nal arbitr
а
tion. The guidelines of
distinguishableness and fitness are customary apparatus
that have been precept in global business mediation prac-
ЎЗБЕКИСТОН
ҚОНУНЧИЛИГИ
ТАҲЛИЛИ
♦
UZBEK LAW REVIEW
♦
ОБЗОР
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
2020
№
1
♦
ЎЗБЕКИСТОН
ҚОНУНЧИЛИГИ
ТАҲЛИЛИ
♦
UZBEK LAW REVIEW
♦
ОБЗОР
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
92
tices to peer that the interests and consistent quest for its
key gamers are cultivated.
Keywords:
arbitral tribunal, international arbitration,
competence-competence, TIAC, ICSID, UNCITRAL Model
law, Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC),
China International Economic and Commercial Arbitration
Committee (CIETAC), International Chamber of Com-
merce (ICC) and London International Arbitration court
(LIAC), lex arbitri, New York treaty.
Global arbitration has developed the favored system of
solving disagreements among many business associates
in nearly all features of global trade, market, and invest-
ment. The determination of an argument by gives the
meaning of global arbitration provides the parties with a
chance to find resolution for their rows in a strictly confi-
dential, intimate fee and period proficient method before
an impartial trial of one’s selection. Nevertheless, if one of
the was to identify the only most crucial benefit of arbitral
proceeding above process as signifies of agreeing cross
boarder business arguments, it’s the grade of inevitability
that the revelries’ treaty to judge will be appreciated and
the final consequence of the arbitral proceeding, the arbi-
tral reward, realized and imposed practically ubiquitously
all around the globe. This’s the impeccable success of the
1958 New York Treaty on the acknowledgement and im-
plementation of overseas arbitral rewards.
The introduction of a dispute resolution mechanism in
arbitration is a particular important in our country to ensure
the protection of the rights and legitimate interests of busi-
ness entities, improve the business environment and in-
crease the country's investment attractiveness. To create
a very favorable investment climate in Uzbekistan, com-
prehensive measures are being taken to liberalize the
economy, create favorable legal conditions for investors,
especially foreign investors, as well as strengthen interna-
tional economic ties. According to statistics, the total in-
vestment in the first six months of 2019 amounted to 101
trillion sums. The share of foreign investments amounted
to USD 5.6 billion. $ 2.1 billion is guaranteed by the state,
and the remaining $ 3.5 billion is direct investment. This is
4.3 times more than last year. Last year, $ 2.8 billion was
spent. Currently, foreign investors are investing more in
construction, textiles, pharmaceuticals, food processing,
electrical engineering and metallurgy. Until 2018, the oil
and gas direction prevailed. Now his rate has dropped
from 73 to 35 percent. This means that investments are
starting to flow into other sectors as well.
On November 6, 2018, President Shavkat Mirziyoyev
signed a decree on the establishment of the Tashkent
International Arbitration Center (TIAC) at the Chamber of
Commerce and Industry of Uzbekistan. The Center, as a
non-governmental non-profit organization, conducts arbi-
tration disputes between business entities registered in
different countries, including foreign investors, in disputes
arising from contractual and other civil law relations on
investments, intellectual property and block chain technol-
ogies, provides advice to local and foreign businesses on
how to prevent investment disputes, including if one of the
parties is the state.
In our country, consistent work is underway to improve
the dialogue between state structures and the population,
to ensure reliable protection of the rights and freedoms of
citizens and to introduce modern mechanisms for solving
their problems. At the same time, the current stage of re-
forms in this area requires the creation of a unified system
of pre-trial dispute resolution in state bodies, the transfor-
mation of mediation, arbitration and international arbitra-
tion into effective alternative dispute resolution institutions
that have won the trust of citizens and entrepreneurs.
Starting the viewpoint of the lawful sequences adjust-
ing worldwide arbitral proceeding in the interior of their
limits, global arbitral proceeding establishes, among other
things, a possibly not inconsequential affluence producing
source. Consequently, the vast major part of permitted
sequences attempt in order to keep the efficiency of
worldwide adjudication to confirm and inspire the attraction
of arbitral conflict as a substitute process of argument de-
termination. One of the basic concepts of learning interna-
tional regulation is the need to use the international legiti-
mate sites as they are used in their republic of origin. In
other words, respect the structure of bases in the over-
seas world. This is a legal theory which applies to all law-
ful orders. Nevertheless, one faces many difficulties in its
application; first and primarily, in gaining correct infor-
mation about the value of different sources of law in the
operation of the international legal system. Consequently,
the corresponding weight of specific legitimate orders can
only be calculated with reasonable certainty. For most
cases, ascertaining such hierarchy structure, one must
rely on secondary legal sources.
Since there are major differences in the categorization
and hierarchy of legal sources, especially among civil and
common law judicial systems, these variations will be tak-
en into account in this analysis. Much of the discrepancies
turn round the interpretation of doctrinal documents and
official rulings, which can be categorized as monitors: le-
gal precedents in England should be considered as (prin-
cipal) legal sources. They will rank directly after procedural
law, in the hierarchy of legitimate orders. This will also
focus on how English law should be interpreted, i.e. the
layout of the section in question must follow the precedent
line as stipulated by English courts. In comparison, legal
precedents in Germany and Switzerland may be used as a
secondary system of authority to support in the clarifica-
tion of main legal foundations. In general, the developed
and highest court of law decisions in the judicial system of
the lawful order (i.e. the Federal Court of Justice and the
Federal Supreme Court) will be given considerable atten-
tion. And from the other side of the coin, works of legal
experts will be used as a secondary legal foundation for
interpreting principal bases and precedents. Academic
writing would be weighted more heavily in Germany and
Switzerland than it will be in Britain.
Within the summary of the origins of legislation the
comparatively least troublesome source tends to be pro-
cedural legislation. The number of issues here relate to its
definition, rather than to the role of this system of authority
in the chain of command of lawful bases.
In general, international foundations shall be viewed in
the similar method as they are viewed in their nation of
birth. In a nutshell, one of the big difficulties in this respect
is to define the precise quantity among concrete and pur-
poseful approaches to constitutional law. Although the
strict tactic to legislative explanation is prevalent in English
law and an English court looks beyond the language of the
statute to characterize its significance in very specific situ-
ations, a purposeful approach to legislative intent prevails
in countries with the lawful tradition with civil law.
Arbitration has evolved very significantly since the era
when, even in the first decades afterwards the approval of
the New York Treaty, it was entirely the national law’s cap-
tive. Today it has gained a very marked freedom from do-
mestic legal systems, and unwanted interferences from
ЎЗБЕКИСТОН
ҚОНУНЧИЛИГИ
ТАҲЛИЛИ
♦
UZBEK LAW REVIEW
♦
ОБЗОР
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
2020
№
1
♦
ЎЗБЕКИСТОН
ҚОНУНЧИЛИГИ
ТАҲЛИЛИ
♦
UZBEK LAW REVIEW
♦
ОБЗОР
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
93
local law are probably more the exception than the rule.
Whilst one can expect that the situation will further evolve
as an ever-greater number of states adhere to a more
arbitration-friendly culture, it is unrealistic to expect that
the influence of national law can recede entirely. Complete
autonomy from national law will continue to operate only
for arbitrations under the auspices of ICSID.
This should not necessarily be a reason for apprehen-
sion, even if one believes that global marketable negotia-
tion should be a means for the deal of disagreements
completely alternative to national court systems and is a
system that must remain as detached as possible from
national law. Indeed, in the majority of cases there are
effective tools to keep the influence of national law within
reasonable and acceptable limits. For the parties, the key
to achieving this goal is a sensible appointment of the s
е
at
of the negotiation that gives them desired degree of au-
tonomy and affords them a proficient and
а
rbitration –
responsive system, which perfectly grants them entire
liberty they require, though simultaneously being accessi-
ble to make available the essential bolster and misunder-
standing when necessary. If the arbitr
а
tion only has con-
nections with nations which contribute to a substantial idea
of arbitration, some issues are to be predictable.
In a broader and systematic perspective, it is to be
hoped that states will adopt an extra nuanced method to
the power of national regulation on settlement and on the
responsibility of the lex arbitri. In the interest of furthering
arbitration, states should avoid blindly deferring to the de-
cisions of foreign states, including the government of the
seat, in matters of arbitration. Those decisions should be
taken into consideration and possibly recognized only in-
sofar as they comport with truly pro-arbitration and gener-
ally accepted standards. When this is not the case, states
should exercise their own control over awards at the en-
forcement stage, without paying respect to the choices of
overseas courts of law.
One of the main goals is to improve the system for pro-
tecting the rights and legitimate interests of individuals and
legal entities, expanding alternative options for resolving
disputes, as well as dramatically increasing the role of
international arbitration, mediation and arbitration courts in
optimizing the workload of courts.
In accordance with the Economic Procedure Code and
the Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan,
the judge determines the possibility of concluding a set-
tlement agreement or an alternative solution to the dispute
and explains their legal consequences. It is known from
world practice that the creation of alternative mechanisms
for resolving disputes in the legal community is considered
as an effective means of achieving the restoration of vio-
lated rights of individuals and legal entities.
There are a number of systemic problems that do not
allow enterprises to effectively protect the rights and inter-
ests of foreign investors, to further improve the business
environment and increase the investment attractiveness of
Uzbekistan. Lack of a regulatory framework governing
international arbitration in Uzbekistan, which leads to an
increase in the costs of foreign investors and local busi-
nesses, who are forced to resort to international arbitra-
tion; Current legislation, including the Law of the Republic
of Uzbekistan "On Arbitration Courts", limits the parties'
ability to consider investment disputes in accordance with
international arbitration standards with the involvement of
foreign arbitrators and the application of foreign law; The
lack of clear legal mechanisms for the implementation of
international arbitration decisions in Uzbekistan negatively
affects the confidence of foreign investors in the country's
judicial system, which reduces the country's investment
attractiveness; training and retraining of local arbitrators
and other specialists in the field of international arbitration
is not established.
International arbitration has become an acceptable
way to resolve international disputes between business
partners in almost all areas of international trade, com-
merce and investment. In 2019, 479 disputes were settled
by the Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC)
under the Singapore Arbitration Law, 1,200 disputes were
settled by the China International Economic and Commer-
cial Arbitration Committee (CIETAC), 875 disputes by the
International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) and London
Court of International Arbitration (In the LCIA court) 450
disputes were resolved in accordance with the UNCITRAL
Model Law. In this regard, one of the problems in almost
every jurisdiction is to find an acceptable balance between
the interests of efficiency and legality of arbitration pro-
ceedings. The arbitration system is consensual in nature,
the jurisdiction of the court to consider a specific dispute
can also be transferred if arbitration jurisdiction can be
established. Thus, the courts, as a starting point, should
be empowered to rule on their jurisdiction, including any
circumstances that may preclude it (i.e. the existence,
validity and applicability of the arbitration agreement).
However, most court decisions today also recognize the
right of judges to make decisions in their jurisdiction. This
increases tensions between jurisdictions to determine if an
arbitration agreement exists, as well as the ability of arbi-
trators to determine their own jurisdictions.
Our national legislation contains a number of laws on
the protection of entrepreneurship, in particular, the Con-
stitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the Economic Pro-
cedure Code, "Special Economic Zones", "On investment
and investment activities", "On public-private partnership",
"On guarantees of freedom of entrepreneurship", “Law of
Audit”, etc.
The Strategy of Actions in five priority areas of devel-
opment of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2017-2021 also
includes the reform of the judicial system, the introduction
of modern information technologies, ensuring reliable pro-
tection of the rights and freedoms of citizens in the judicial
system, law enforcement and regulatory bodies. is aimed
at ensuring unhindered access to justice, increasing the
efficiency of processing court documents and other docu-
ments, reducing state participation in the economy in order
to achieve a sustainable economy and sustainable in-
come, protecting private property rights and strengthening
its priority, encouraging small business and private entre-
preneurship. Tasks, such as the continuation of institu-
tional and structural reforms, increasing its competitive-
ness through the modernization and diversification of key
sectors of the national economy, ensuring the rule of law
and justice throughout the country is an unconditional pro-
cess of the judiciary. Due to the fact that the coronavirus
pandemic has caused a number of inconveniences for the
continuation of business and investment activities, now
enterprises and participants in international investment
activities or ordinary citizens can conclude electronic con-
tracts, negotiate electronically, organize electronic tenders
and, of course, ensure justice - one of the priorities. Con-
sequently, in the process of pre-trial dispute resolution, the
Arbitration and Mediation Centers must recognize the
agreements concluded by the parties based on electronic
negotiations on arbitration and mediation, clearly defining
which program or electronic signature of the parties. It is
ЎЗБЕКИСТОН
ҚОНУНЧИЛИГИ
ТАҲЛИЛИ
♦
UZBEK LAW REVIEW
♦
ОБЗОР
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
2020
№
1
♦
ЎЗБЕКИСТОН
ҚОНУНЧИЛИГИ
ТАҲЛИЛИ
♦
UZBEK LAW REVIEW
♦
ОБЗОР
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
94
also necessary to introduce into the legislation online arbi-
tration to make it easier for the parties in the event of a
global pandemic emergency and in the future. And, of
course, the draft law on international commercial arbitra-
tion should include the acceptance of each document in
electronic form as evidence, based on the experience of
the USA, UK, United Arab Emirates and Singapore.
At the same time, there are a number of systemic
problems that do not allow business to effectively protect
the rights and interests of foreign investors, to further im-
prove the business environment and increase the invest-
ment attractiveness of Uzbekistan. In particular:
first, the lack of a legal framework regulating interna-
tional arbitration in Uzbekistan leads to an increase in the
costs of foreign investors and local enterprises, which are
forced to resort to international arbitration in foreign coun-
tries to resolve disputes;
secondly, the current legislation, including the Law of
the Republic of Uzbekistan "On Arbitration Courts", limits
the ability of the parties to consider investment disputes in
accordance with international arbitration standards with
the involvement of foreign arbitrators and the application
of foreign law;
thirdly, the lack of clear legal mechanisms for the im-
plementation of international arbitration decisions in Uz-
bekistan negatively affects the confidence of foreign inves-
tors in the country's judicial system, thereby reducing the
country's investment attractiveness;
fourthly, there is a lack of training and retraining of lo-
cal arbitrators and other specialists in the field of interna-
tional arbitration.
The study examined the experience of countries with
developed legal systems based on different legal systems,
in particular, the UNCITRAL model laws adopted by Ger-
many, Great Britain, Japan, Singapore, the CIS countries,
Kazakhstan and the United Nations.
International arbitration has become an acceptable
way of resolving disputes between business partners in
almost all areas of international trade, commerce and in-
vestment. International Arbitration Dispute Resolution al-
lows the parties to resolve their disputes in a personal,
confidential, economic and time-saving manner in a neu-
tral court of their choice. However, if someone identifies
arbitration as the most important priority of arbitration as a
means of resolving disputes, it is necessary to determine
the degree of confidence of the parties that the arbitration
agreement will be respected and that it will be the result of
the arbitration.
In this regard, one of the problems in almost every ju-
risdiction is to find an acceptable balance between the
interests of efficiency and legality of arbitration proceed-
ings. The arbitration system is consensual in nature, the
jurisdiction of the court to consider a specific dispute can
also be transferred if arbitration jurisdiction can be estab-
lished. Thus, the courts, as a starting point, should be em-
powered to rule on their jurisdiction, including any circum-
stances that may preclude it (i.e. the existence, validity
and applicability of the arbitration agreement). However,
most court decisions today also recognize the right of
judges to make decisions in their jurisdiction. This in-
creases tensions between jurisdictions to determine if an
arbitration agreement exists, as well as the ability of arbi-
trators to determine their own jurisdictions.
Under article 16 of the UNCITRAL Model Law on In-
ternational Commercial Arbitration of 1985, the powers of
the Arbitral Tribunal to decide matters within its jurisdiction
are as follows:
(1) The arbitral tribunal may rule on any matter within
its jurisdiction, including:
Objections to the existence or validity of an arbitration
agreement, to this end, an arbitration clause that forms
part of a contract should be treated as an agreement in-
dependent of the other terms of the contract. The decision
of the arbitral tribunal on the invalidity of the contract does
not invalidate the ipso arbitration charter.
Pursuant to section 30 of the United Kingdom Arbitra-
tion Act 1996, the Court's jurisdiction is as follows:
(1) Unless the parties have agreed otherwise, the arbi-
tral tribunal may decide within its jurisdiction, namely:
(a) Whether an arbitration agreement exists or not;
(b) Whether the court is properly organized
(c) What is involved in the arbitration in accordance
with the arbitration agreement.
(2) Any such decision may be appealed or revised in
accordance with the existing arbitration proceedings or the
provisions of this section.
The adoption of the Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan
"On International Commercial Arbitration" and the estab-
lishment of arbitration jurisdiction in it creates the following
advantages for our legislation:
–
Gathers practitioners of international arbitration
courts and experienced and qualified arbitrators who are
well versed in combining civil law procedures with ele-
ments of common law;
–
A legal environment will be created that will help to
resolve disputes successfully, striving for time and sav-
ings;
–
By agreement of the parties, in addition to local
law, the legal system chosen by agreement of the parties,
as well as the law of a foreign state may be used in resolv-
ing disputes;
–
Enforcement of decisions of arbitration courts in the
territory of the Republic of Uzbekistan is carried out in the
manner prescribed by the legislation, as well as interna-
tional treaties of the Republic of Uzbekistan;
–
Cost: Historically, arbitration has often seen dis-
putes as a moderately cheaper method than litigation;
–
Speed. With a few exceptions, arbitration tends to
follow a more precise and defined time interval to resolve
a dispute, and judges do not always face excessive work-
load and workload, which leads to faster final decisions;
–
Justice: Arbitration judges are often selected by
agreement of both parties, using a third party arbitration
service or the method specified when access from both
parties is permitted. This means that in many cases nei-
ther side controls who the arbitrator (or arbitrator) is;
–
Conclusion. Often, it is very difficult to appeal arbi-
tral awards, even if the judge has made gross errors. This
can be a positive factor in ending the final discussion in
one way or another and allows the parties to continue;
–
Simplified Procedures: A typical trial process can
involve many documents, multiple discussions, testimony,
subpoenas, and other similar processes. Arbitration can
destroy some or all of the time-consuming and costly liti-
gation tools.
–
Confidential: Arbitration proceedings are not held in
public and records are not part of public records. In some
cases, this can be very beneficial for the parties.
In conclusion, the Law on International Commercial
Arbitration plays an important role in maintaining Uzbeki-
stan's reputation as an international arbitration center in
the region. The Law on International Arbitration is a har-
monization of the UNCITRAL Model Law. The adoption of
ЎЗБЕКИСТОН
ҚОНУНЧИЛИГИ
ТАҲЛИЛИ
♦
UZBEK LAW REVIEW
♦
ОБЗОР
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
2020
№
1
♦
ЎЗБЕКИСТОН
ҚОНУНЧИЛИГИ
ТАҲЛИЛИ
♦
UZBEK LAW REVIEW
♦
ОБЗОР
ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА
УЗБЕКИСТАНА
95
this law will also coordinate Uzbekistan's efforts to develop
a legal environment conducive to investor confidence.
References
1. The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan,
08.12.1992
2. Code of Economic Procedure, 24.01.2018
3. Law “On special economic zones”, 17.02.2020
4. Law “On investments and investment activities”,
25.12.2019
5. Law “On public-private partnership”, 10.05.2019
6. Law “On guarantees of freedom of entrepreneurial
activity”, 02.05.2012
7. Law “On auditing activities”, 26.05.2000
8. Law “On Arbitration Courts”, 16.10.2006
9. Hossain M. M. International Commercial Arbitration:
The Need for Harmonized Legal Regime on Court Or-
dered Interim Measures of Relief // University of Toronto
(Canada), ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2012."Need
for speed: Summary Proceedings under UAE Law". //
https://www.stalawfirm.com/en/blogs/view/need-for-speed-
summary-proceedings-under-uae-law.html.
10. Margaret L. Moses (2012), The Principles and
Practice
of
International
Commercial
Arbitration,
Cambridge University Press. P 3.
11.
O'Sullivan,
Arthur
;
Sheffrin,
Steven
M.
(2003). Economics: Principles in Action. Upper Saddle
River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
12. John P. Campbell, "Taft, Roosevelt, and the Arbi-
tration Treaties of 1911," Journal of American Histo-
ry (1966) 53#2 p: 279-298.
13. Islambek Rustambekov, Diana Tsutieva. Contem-
porary reforms in the development of the institute of inter-
national arbitration in the Republic of Uzbekistan // ABA
Section of International Law. Eurasia/Russia Committee
Newsletter. 2019. –P.2-3.
Ш
.
Ишметова
,
Преподаватель
ТГЮУ
НЕКОТОРЫЕ
ВОПРОСЫ
СТАНОВЛЕНИЯ
СИСТЕМЫ
РЕГУЛИРОВАНИЯ
МЕЖДУНАРОДНОГО
РАЗДЕЛЕНИЯ
ТРУДА
Аннотация
:
В
статье
рассматриваются
общие
во
-
просы
международного
разделения
труда
,
формиро
-
вание
и
развитие
системы
регулирования
междуна
-
родного
разделения
труда
с
учетом
развития
между
-
народной
торговли
.
Ключевые
слова
:
международная
торговля
,
меж
-
дународное
разделение
труда
,
глобализация
,
торгов
-
ля
и
инвестиции
.
Abstract:
The article examines general issues of the
international division of labor, the formation and develop-
ment of a system of regulation of the international division
of labor, taking into account the development of interna-
tional trade.
Keywords:
international trade, international division of
labor, globalization, trade and investment.
Аннотация
:
Мақолада
халқаро
меҳнат
бўлинишининг
умумий
жиҳатлари
кўриб
чиқилган
бўлиб
,
унда
халқаро
савдо
муносабатлари
ривожланишидан
келиб
чиқиб
халқаро
меҳнат
бўлинишини
тартибга
солиш
тизимининг
шаклланиши
ва
ривожланиши
таҳлил
қилинган
.
Калит
сўзлар
:
халқаро
савдо
,
халқаро
меҳнат
бўлиниши
,
глобализация
,
савдо
ва
инвестиция
.
Международное
разделение
труда
(
далее
–
МРТ
)
является
важным
фактором
развития
международной
экономики
,
находящийся
в
ее
основе
.
Понятие
МРТ
можно
проиллюстрировать
таким
образом
,
что
чело
-
век
,
который
достаточно
хорошо
владеет
определен
-
ной
квалификацией
и
способен
профессионально
вы
-
полнять
свою
работу
,
является
гарантией
качества
и
своевременности
для
какой
-
либо
фирмы
или
компа
-
нии
.
Это
дает
значительные
преимущества
перед
ор
-
ганизациями
,
в
которых
сотрудники
вынуждены
уде
-
лять
внимание
на
множество
процессов
,
происходя
-
щих
вокруг
одновременно
.
Также
происходит
и
на
международном
уровне
,
где
определенная
страна
мо
-
жет
специализироваться
на
производстве
конкретных
товаров
и
услуг
.
Сформированный
на
сегодняшний
день
мировой
рынок
обладает
огромным
количеством
различных
товаров
и
услуг
,
которые
подтверждают
наличие
и
влияние
международного
экономического
разделения
труда
.
Основополагающим
механизмом
,
обусловли
-
вающим
нарастающий
разрыв
в
уровне
и
качестве
жизни
,
является
международное
разделение
труда
.
Важным
является
рассмотрение
каким
образом
формировалось
международное
разделения
труда
и
его
система
регулирования
.
Начиная
с
XVI
века
меж
-
дународная
экономика
прошла
несколько
этапов
раз
-
деления
труда
.
Первое
международное
разделение
труда
,
охваты
-
вающее
ранний
период
европейской
колонизации
,
бы
-
ло
основано
на
элементарном
обмене
между
основ
-
ными
странами
и
вытеснении
с
экономической
пери
-
ферии
.
Из
истории
известно
,
что
основными
странами
в
Европе
были
центры
военного
и
торгового
контроля
.
Эти
страны
занимались
сельскохозяйственным
,
мине
-
