Mualliflar

  • Masuma Obidjonova

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.yottoro.123208

Kalit so‘zlar:

Speculative fiction Short story theory Principle of reality Fantastic Literary studies Comparative literary analysis

Annotasiya

This piece comparatively analyzes speculative fiction features in some short stories of an American author Ray Bradbury and an Uzbek writer Hojiakbar Shaykhov. It touches upon common aspects of their works, identifying humanism as a major theme of their respective short stories. The article also points out some original features of their works. Based on the analysis the author puts forward some conclusions for consideration.


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

20-

to’plam

3-son Iyun 2025

159

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SPECULATIVE FICTION FEATURES

IN SOME SHORT STORIES OF RAY BRADBURY AND HOJIAKBAR

SHAYKHOV

Masuma Obidjonova

Senior lecturer at Tashkent State

University of Uzbek Language and Literature, PhD

Abstract

This piece comparatively analyzes speculative fiction features in some short

stories of an American author Ray Bradbury and an Uzbek writer Hojiakbar

Shaykhov. It touches upon common aspects of their works, identifying humanism

as a major theme of their respective short stories. The article also points out some

original features of their works. Based on the analysis the author puts forward some

conclusions for consideration.

Key words

Speculative fiction, Short story, theory, Principle of reality, Fantastic,

Literary studies, Comparative literary analysis

In this article we intend to look into genre features of speculative fiction in

Ray Bradbury’

s

and Hojiakbar Shaykhov’s

short stories.

Tzvetan Todorov, who is credited as a creator of the theoretical genre of the

fantastic, points out:

“I

n a world which is indeed our world, the one we know, a

world without devils, sylphides, or vampires, there occurs an event which cannot

be explained by the laws of this same familiar world. The person who experiences

the event must opt for one of two possible solutions: either he is the victim of an

illusion of the senses, of a product of the imagination

and the laws of the world

then remain what they are; or else the event has indeed taken place, it is an integral


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

20-

to’plam

3-son Iyun 2025

160

part of reality

but then this reality is controlled by laws unknown to us. The

fantastic occupies the duration of this uncertainty. Once we choose one answer or

the other, we leave the fantastic for a neighboring genre, the uncanny or the

marvelous….

The fantastic . . . implies an integration of the reader into the world

of the characters; that world is defined by the reader’s own ambiguous perception

of the events narrated. It must be noted that we have in mind no actual reader, but

the role of the reade

r implicit in the text (just as the narrator’s func

tion is implicit

in the text) [1].

A Turkish researcher

Şeyma Karaca

points out that “

Bradbury uses

conventions of fantasy and science fiction in his stories.

[2] She tries to

“define

fantasy and science fiction in the context of the reality principle because the

relationship between these two genres and the real and unreal determines their

position in literature

. [3] An Uzbek researcher Rano Ibrohimova in some way

echoes that definition, stating “fantasy as

a

genre takes its roots from fairy tales”.

[4]

She references to Hojiakbar Shaykhov’s work “

Telba dunyo

” (Crazy world)

citing that

“Uzbek science fiction arose from fairy tales.”

As Ray Bradbury himself

stated, “

all science fiction is an attempt to solve problems by pretending to look

the other way

”.

[5]

Agreeing that principle of reality serves as a borderline for both fantasy and

science fiction, we believe it is worth differentiating these two genres. Science

fiction and fantasy both fall under speculative fiction genre where many elements,

characters, and settings are created out of imagination and speculation rather than

reality and everyday life. However, there is a distinct difference between science

fiction and fantasy. Science fiction is based on science and technology and

therefore, depicts scenarios that could be true one day. Science fiction can be

basically categorized into hard science fiction and soft science fiction. Hard science

fiction often involves accurate details, especially physics, astrophysics, and

chemistry, and accurately portrays and predicts advanced technology that is yet to

be invented. Soft science fiction is based on social sciences such as psychology,


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

20-

to’plam

3-son Iyun 2025

161

political science, sociology, economics, and anthropology and are not as scientific

as the hard genre.[6] Fantasy, on the other hand, involves many supernatural

elements and takes place in a world that does not and cannot ever exist. Therefore,

the main difference between science fiction and fantasy is that science fiction has

its base in science and consists of possibilities whereas fantasy has no base on

reality and consists of impossibilities.

Looking for answers to our questions within our comparative analysis we

intend to look at personalities, and some works of the two authors. Because, as Ray

Bradbury pointed out, “

I have always tried to write my own story. Give it a label

if you wish, call it science fiction or fantasy or the mystery or the western. But, at

heart, all good stories are the one kind of story, the story written by an individual

man from his individual truth

. [7]

Ray Douglas Bradbury was a US writer of fantasy, horror, science fiction

and mystery. He is widely considered to be one of the 20th century’s greatest and

most popular writers of science fiction, however, Bradbury famously, and

consi

stently, resisted the title of “science fiction writer”

[8] claiming that his work

was based on the fantastical and unreal. Nevertheless, h

e is defined as “one of

the

masters of science fiction and fantasy”.

[9] His fascination with magic and future

technology in his early childhood helped him to shape his fantastic and science

fictional stories. Aside from his most well-known work, 1953's Fahrenheit 451, the

prolific author and screenwriter claimed to have penned mostly fantasies

stories

filled with impossible events. His works have been translated into more than 40

languages and have sold tens of millions of copies in different countries. His

popularity continues in the 21st century. During his long writing career, Bradbury

wrote almost 600 short stories, eleven novels, as well as various poems and plays.

[10]

Ray Bradbury’s principal literary form has been the short story, and he has

published several important collections, including Dark Carnival (1947), The

Illustrated Man (1951), The Golden Apples of the Sun (1953), and I Sing the Body

Electric! (1969). Two important extensive collections of his short stories are The


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

20-

to’plam

3-son Iyun 2025

162

Stories of Ray Bradbury (1980) and Bradbury Stories: One Hundred of His Most

Celebrated Tales (2003).

Hojiakbar Shaykhov (1945-2002) was one of the founders of Uzbek science

fiction. Hojiakbar Shaykhov is the author of more than 30 science fiction stories,

short stories and novels. "Renee's Riddle" (1977), "Glorious Steps" (1977),

"Operation Seventh" (1979), "Strange Shadow" (1980), "Diamond Shine" (1983),

"The Destruction of the Last Dragon" (1985), " Living Dreams ”(1985),“ Memory

of Ancestors ”(1986),“ Burning River ”(1986),“ School Stage ”(1988),“

Magic

Girl”(1989),“ Crazy World ”(1990),“ Connected Worlds»(1996),«The Witch's

Husband

»(1999),« Two Worlds of Troubles »(2001), etc. there are fantastic stories

and novels. In his works, the struggle between good and evil, right and wrong,

tolerance and selfishness is reflected in a unique way in science fiction forms. No

matter how supernatural the series of events is, no matter how strange the heroes

are, no matter what happens not only on Earth, but in the whole universe, on the

neighboring planets, they are ultimately connected in some way to the lives and

concerns of people today. His works, such as "Strange Shadow", "Rene's Puzzle",

"Diamond Gloss", became popular among readers and were translated into several

languages. Hojiakbar Shaykhov is recognized in Uzbek literature as the founder of

the science fiction genre. This is evidenced by the fact that the encyclopedia of the

world's most advanced science fiction writers, published in the United States,

includes the name of Hojiakbar Shaykhov as a representative of Uzbek literature.

[11]

Analyzing short stories of the both authors, we believe that main

characteristic feature that unites them is their humanism.

There is a consensus that, as Erik Sofge puts it, Ray Bradbury was science

fiction's first great humanist.[12] Some have criticized his science-fiction stories

for their scientific and technological inaccuracies, a criticism that Bradbury did

accept, stating that was a

“people”

writer. [13] His dominating concerns are social,

cultural, and intellectual issues, not scientific accuracies. Bradbury is also known


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

20-

to’plam

3-son Iyun 2025

163

for his distrust for technological advancement.

"What if one day our race for development gets out of control?" The author

raises this question in his short story "The Smile". The narrator describes to the

reader a story that takes place in 2061. He paints ruined, broken, charred

cityscapes; creates vivid portraits of the poor, accurately conveys their remarks and

reasoning - and behind such a calm intonation of the narrative, a desperate cry

breaks out. "Think about it!" - the writer inspires, - "What will this run lead to?"

The reader sees people who have lost themselves in the race for civilization. “Who

needs it? .. It's all in vain anyway,” says one of the main chara

cters - Grigsby. Tom,

who saves Gioconda

’s smile in his

fist, and smiles back at her, gives us hope that

brainy people, whose soul lies to the beautiful will eventually prevail.

Several critics have accused him of sentimentality and simplicity because of

his critical acceptance of technical progress, his emphasis mainly on human values,

his opposition to modern materialism against the human spirit, and his belief in the

basic virtues of small village life against the weak indifference of big cities.

Bradbury responded by saying, "Critics write with their heads, and I write from the

heart." His most chilling stories comment on the human consequences of progress.

Science ran t

oo far ahead of us too quickly,” he once said, “

and the people got

lost

in a mechanical wilderness.”

Bradbury believed that one purpose of science

fiction “

is to warn about negative things that might happen in the future if care is

not taken in the present”

.

Bradbury's idea is vividly portrayed in

The

Pedestrian”

. [14] Mankind has

taken great strides toward progress with inventions such as television. However,

when children refuse to read and play outdoors to turn on the TV, the question may

arise as to whether this is progress or decline.

In “The Pedestrian”

, Ray Bradbury

chose to make a statement about the impact of these changes. Through the images

of the protagonists of the story, it shows that if society rises to the point where it

loses its humanity, then humanity can also perish.

Mr Leonard Mead, who loved walking in silence, in ten years of walking by


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

20-

to’plam

3-son Iyun 2025

164

night or day, for thousands of miles, had never met another person walking, not

one in all that time. We could say he is the last man, who has become a stranger

for a society in 2053. His interaction with the police car demonstrates that very

clearly, as the police car seems surprised by his answers to its questions:

‘Your name?’ said the police car in a metallic whisper. He couldn’t see the

men in it because of the bright light in his eyes.

‘Leonard Mead,’ he said.

…‘Business or profession?’

‘I think you’d call me a writer.’

‘No profession,’ said

the police car, as if talking to itself

….

‘What are you doing out?’

‘Walking,’ said

Leonard Mead.

‘Walking!’

‘Just walking,’ he said simply, but his face felt cold.

‘Walking, just walking, walking?’

‘Yes, sir.’

‘Walking where? For what?’

The progress portrayed by the police car with a metallic voice takes Mr Mead

to the psychiatric centre in the end of the short story. Bradbury reminds us that

progress without a soul may eventually destroy us as human beings. The impact of

development on humanity as a result of the loss of humanity’s spirit is evident

in

the conversation between Mr Mead and the police car. The car does not understand

the need for humanity. It

doesn’t understand Mr. Mid’s desire to return to nature

-

“just walking to see” is

incomprehensible to him.

It can’t understand why Mr Mead

isn’t inclined to sit in front of a “watch screen” or “breathe air conditioning air”.

Development does not feel the need for humanity. It simply locks him in the back

seat and takes away from his house. Bradbury thus warns that humanity can only

end sadly if becomes a captive of technical progress.

The same could be said about Hojiakbar Shaykhov’s works. As prominent

Uzbek literary critic Ozod Sharafiddinov stated, Shaykhov's works contain all the

necessary features of

fantastika

, meaning that their events take place not only on

Earth, but throughout the Univers

e, in neighboring galaxies. Shaykhov’s

protagonists are various robots, aliens, human-like or non-human-like creatures.

However, no matter how supernatural the series of events may be, no matter how

strange the heroes may be, they will ultimately be linked in some way to the lives

of the people on Earth. The writer thinks of weaving interesting, fascinating


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

20-

to’plam

3-son Iyun 2025

165

adventures from each other, not to occupy the reader's imagination, but to raise

man's eternal problems, to appeal to the human conscience, to awaken him from

his slumber, and to make him more perfect. Therefore, at the heart of Shaykhov's

works are the issues of meaning, belief, honesty and purity of human life. The

writer depicts the struggle between good and evil, right and wrong, tolerance and

selfishness in science fiction forms. [15]

We can find tones regarding technological progress and humane values

paradigm

in Hojiakbar Shaykov’s short story “

Sirli Nur

” (

Mysterious Light

). [16]

The author warns that even most advanced technologies can lead humanity to

destruction, if people do not use them in a proper way. A planet “Ziyo” discovered

by astronauts has achieved significant technological progress, and people there

were able to live up to thousand years. A protagonist of the short story Davron

Sharipov lands on the planet, but finds no-one, as all inhabitants of the planet had

perished due to their selfishness. The Medical Academy of the planet discovers

“anti

-

genes” to vaccinate the population, which would allow them to live a

thousand years. However, that invention did not satisfy all, as sociologists of the

planet warn that without natural deaths demographic growth would mean that the

planet would not be able to feed all. Hojiakbar Shaykhov points out that, social

thought and technological progress should develop in a harmonious way. “D

ue to

some peculiarities of the developing social societies on the planet, sciences such as

biology, medicine, and genetics developed rapidly and were far ahead of their

time

. The Council of the planet decides to temporarily sterile the population, to

allow scientists to find ways for the solution of the problem. A few years later, the

high spirits and joys were replaced by other emotions. It was as if something had

happened to the human psyche. People became cautious, slow, and vigilant.

Everyone has developed a habit of carefully monitoring their health, which can

cause panic if they get a little sick. The number of cases of mutual neglect has

increased. Suddenly it became a habit to get nervous for something trivial, to be

stupidly upset. The number of people willing to participate in scientific


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

20-

to’plam

3-son Iyun 2025

166

experiments has sharply decreased, and university audiences have become empty.

No one wanted to risk their lives. Astronauts, sailors, pilots, and underwater divers

gave up their jobs en masse and began to engage in peaceful activities near their

homes. Mankind, which was once a whole, has been divided into separate

individuals who are confined to a narrow and limited world. When there was such

a wonderful opportunity to live a thousand years, no one would want to die of an

illness or an accident. But the worst was yet to come. The effect of the temporary

sterilization had already expired, but for some reason the birth still did not recur.

Previously, it was suggested that sterilization would likely affect more than the

estimated time. But as the years passed, the decades were replaced by new decades,

and centuries passed

people began to forget even what a baby's cry sounded

like. Thus, it was recalled that the sterilization experiments were carried out in a

hurry, and that the interaction of the sterilizer with the anti-genes was not

investigated at all. Apparently, the same - the interaction of the anti-genes and the

sterilizer - gave rise to a new feature of the organism - infertility. This eventually

leads to the extinction of people on the planet. Hojiakbar Shaykhov makes a

conclusion that even the most advanced technology cannot solve problems of

humankind, if people do not care enough for humane values.

Comparative

analysis of Ray Bradbury’s and Hojiakbar Shaykhov’s short

stories discloses original tendencies in their works. First of all, we should mention

the length of their compared short stories. Ray Bradbury’s “The Pedestrian” is

based on minimalism, but manages to give us clear understanding of the plot and

what is behind it

that is technological progress embodies in one police car.

Bradbury’s strength

is that he can describe

Mr Mead’s

loneliness, desertedness,

strangeness in one sentence. Answering

the police car’s question about marriage

,

he replies “Nodiv wanted me”.

Whereas, it takes pages for Hojiakbar Shaykhov

to describe what caused decline of the planet “Ziyo”. Shaykhov has to go into

details, creating new words (“anti

-

genes”), to explain us his intention from the

story. He even adds the text of a last will of the people of the planet, which seems


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

20-

to’plam

3-son Iyun 2025

167

unnecessary, as its message could probably be incorporated into information that

Davron Sharipov gets from the planet’s Cyber Centre.

However, despite these obvious dissimilarities, which probably speak about

the level of poetics and talent of the both writers, their common feature in using

speculative fiction in their short stories is a call for humanity to stay humane. That

message is definitely common for both of them.

References:

1.

Todorov, T. (1975).

The Fantastic: A Structural Approach to a Literary

Genre

. (p.25, 31). Ithaca: Cornell University press.

2.

Şeyma, K. K. (2013).

“Fantastic and science fictional elements in Ray

Bradbury’s stories”,

Master’s thesis, the university of Yüzüncü yil, Institute

of social sciences, Van, Turkey, 2013, p.1, (date of reference 05.03.2021).

Retrieved

from

https://www.academia.edu/38147146/FANTASTIC_AND_SCIENCE_FIC

TIONAL_ELEMENTS_IN_RAY_BRADBURYS_STORIES_pdf

3.

Ibroximova, R.

(2003). “Fantastikada an’ana va adabiy ta’sir masalasi”,

«J

ahon adabiy

oti» journal

, volume 8, (date of reference 05.03.2021).

https://ziyouz.uz/ilm-va-fan/adabiyot/rano-ibrohimova-fantastikada-anana-

va-adabiy-tasir-masalasi/

4.

Bradbury, R. (1996).

“Zen in the art of writing”,

Joshua Odell Editions,

Santa Barbara, ISBN 1-877741-09-4, p.104.

5.

Ibroximova, R. (2002). “J

ahon adabiy

oti va fantastika”,

«J

ahon adabiy

oti»

journal

, volume 10, (date of reference 05.03.2021).

https://ziyouz.uz/ilm-

va-fan/adabiyot/rano-ibrohimova-jahon-adabiyoti-va-fantastika/

6.

Lotman, Jy. (1970). O principah hudozhestvennoj fantastiki.

Uchen. zap.

Tart. gos. un-ta.

, Vyp. 284. (Tr. po znakovym sistemam: [T.] 5), pp. 285-

287.


background image

Yangi O'zbekiston taraqqiyotida tadqiqotlarni o'rni va rivojlanish omillari


https://scientific-jl.com/

20-

to’plam

3-son Iyun 2025

168

7.

Bradbury, R. (1996).

“Zen in the art of writing”

, Joshua Odell Editions,

Santa Barbara, ISBN 1-877741-09-4, p.149.

8.

(2005). Roosevelt Intermediate School, Westfield, NJ #3 Interview,

lists.topica.com. March 23, 2005.

9.

Bloom, H. (2010).

Introduction. Modern Critical Views:

Ray Bradbury. Ed.

Harold Bloom. (pp.1-2). New York: Infobase Publishing.

10.

Bradbury,

R.

(2010).

Retrieved

03.2021

from:

https://raybradbury.com/work/on

11.

Retrieved

06.03.2021

from

https://www.savoljavob.com/en/%D2%B3%D0%

)

12.

Retrieved

06.03.2021

from

https://www.popularmechanics.com/culture/movies/a7720/ray-bradbury-

science-fictions-first-great-humanist-9492022/

13.

Bradbury, R. (1996).

“Zen in the art of writing”

, Joshua Odell Editions,

Santa Barbara, ISBN 1-877741-09-4, p.18.

14.

Bradbury, R. (1989).

"The Pedestrian."

Literature and the Writing Process.

Ed. Elizabeth McMahan, et al. 2nd ed. (pp.104-106). New York: MacMillan.

15.

Hojiakbar (2001). Ikki%20jahon%20ovorasi%20(2001).pdf

16.

Ziyouz (2020).

Hojiakbar nasri.

Retrieved 07.03.2021 from:

https://n.ziyouz.com/books/uzbek_nasri/Hojiakbar%