Authors

  • Qayumov Baxtiyor
    Doctoral student at NamSU, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume04Issue07-11

Keywords:

Creativity psychoanalysis multifactor theory

Abstract

The article provides a psychological analysis of the concept of creativity. The opinions of foreign scientists about creativity are systematized. Various psychological approaches to creativity are analyzed.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 07-2024

76


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

07

P

AGES

:

76-80

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

The article provides a psychological analysis of the concept of creativity. The opinions of foreign scientists about

creativity are systematized. Various psychological approaches to creativity are analyzed.

KEYWORDS

Creativity, psychoanalysis, behaviorism, multifactor theory.

INTRODUCTION

Creativity is a very complex term that has been defined

using various theories (philosophical, psychoanalytic,

behavioral, developmental, evolutionary, clinical,

social, organizational, educational, historical-cultural).

We can trace ideas about creativity as a philosophical

category in the manuscripts of the ancient Greek

philosophers Plato and Aristotle. According to Plato,

creativity is a God-given gift that comes when

"Inspiration" comes. On the contrary, according to

Aristotle, creativity arises as a result of the

manifestation of rationality.

The creative process is a source of life, and a person

who has experienced it once will not be able to live

again. It is like a source of power in personal

development. Living without a creative process is like a

disease for a creative person.

In major schools of psychology, the reasons for the

emergence of personal creativity were expressed in

Research Article

CREATIVITY AS A RESEARCH SUBJECT IN PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH

Submission Date:

July 21, 2024,

Accepted Date:

July 26, 2024,

Published Date:

July 31, 2024

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajsshr/Volume04Issue07-11


Qayumov Baxtiyor

Doctoral student at NamSU, Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajsshr

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 07-2024

77


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

07

P

AGES

:

76-80

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

different ways. In these classifications they derive from

the structure of their theories.

In the theory of psychoanalysis, Z. Freud and K. Jung

highlighted two (motivational and unconscious)

aspects of creativity. According to S.Freud, creative

motives are related to eros (attraction to life) and arise

from sexual desires. Creativity is desexualization, that

is, the process of creative constructive activity of

sexual energy. Transfer of repressed aspirations and

experiences to creative activity, that is, the process of

sublimation takes place. According to the theory of S.

Freud, the most important source of creativity is the

unconscious. According to Z. Freud, the unconscious is

the most "creative" part of the psyche.

K. Jung used the concept of the unconscious to

interpret creativity. According to him, the unconscious

is the basis of new ideas, thoughts and reflections. It is

considered to be the driving force of creativity and

inspiration. K. Jung identified two structures in a

person: one is personal, the other is creative. Creative

structure develops a person at the level of

unconsciousness and encourages him to make

decisions based on inner spiritual experiences in

perceiving life and solving problems. The internal

structure of the individual always exists as a collective

consciousness. In the theory of psychoanalysis,

creativity is considered as a natural, unconscious

structure.

Skinner, a representative of the behaviorist theory,

evaluated creativity as an individual activity and

believed that it occurs as a result of stimulus and

reaction. In addition, according to Skinner's

interpretation, he believed that creativity is not the

emergence of a new idea in a person, but, on the

contrary, the manifestation of existing ideas.

Dj. Kelly, a representative of cognitive theory, defined

creativity in a person without using the term

"creativity". According to him, a person is a researcher,

a scientist, who interacts with the world effectively and

creatively. He says that while mastering the universe,

he processes information, interprets the environment

and can predict the future. Human life is always

research, which puts forward hypotheses about reality

and thereby controls events. The image of the universe

is based on hypotheses for humans, who, like

scientists, make predictions and try to implement

them. In this way, they perform mental activity. Life is

a process of creative exploration.

According to A. Adler, a representative of the

humanistic theory, every person first has creative

power. As a result, he can lead a life of his own style. A.

Adler tried to explain creativity with "compensation

theory". According to him, a person views any type of

culture (art, science, etc.) as a means of filling a

deficiency in himself. If the creative "I" exists in the

person, he can use his experiences to be the creator of

his life and to develop himself.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 07-2024

78


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

07

P

AGES

:

76-80

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

According to E. Fromm and G. Allports, creativity is not

only a solution to a problem, but also a way of

personality. They also explained the personality as the

quality of the creator of his life. According to E.

Fromm's interpretation, creativity is the ability to be

interested in non-standard situations, to find solutions

and to be frustrated.

According to A. Maslow, creativity is one of the

universal functions affecting the self-expression of a

person. Just as birds can fly, and trees can grow leaves,

humans have a natural basis for expressing creativity.

According to the scientist, creativity does not require

special talent and it is present in every person. In his

opinion, a housewife, entrepreneur, professor can also

be a creative person. But they lose these abilities in the

process of "cultivation", and then they need special

education.

In the above information, we tried to illuminate the

tradition of the concept of creativity in science. Now

we aim to describe in detail the psychological content

and mechanisms of the concept of intelligence.

The term "intellect" entered science later than

creativity. D. Simpson used this term for the first time

in 1922. According to him, the intellect is told to

abandon the stereotypical way of thinking.

E. Chris first interpreted intelligence as a regression

serving the Ego. This approach is psychoanalytic, and

they recognize that the basis of intelligence is

conscious processes.

According to S. Arietti, intelligence is a new level that

is present from the mutual synthesis of unconscious

processes and logical thinking. As a result of these

conclusions, science began to consider intelligence as

a higher mental process.

In general, creativity is understood as an individual's

ability to be creative.

Creativity is derived from the Latin word, which means

to create. To define it, creativity is the ability of a

person to come up with unusual ideas, original

decisions, and to deviate from the usual structure of

thinking.

Despite the fact that theoretical and practical

definitions and interpretations of creativity are

presented in science, its single definition and clear

psychodiagnostic method have not been determined.

Taylor mentioned that more than 60 definitions of

creativity were given in his research in the 60s of the

20th century. He divided them into 6 major schools of

thought:

1. According to the gestalt approach, the creative

process is to destroy the existing gestalt to build a

better one;


background image

Volume 04 Issue 07-2024

79


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

07

P

AGES

:

76-80

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

2. In the innovative direction, aimed at evaluating

creativity based on the novelty of the final product;

3. In creativity in the aesthetic or expressive direction,

attention is paid to the self-expression of the creative

person;

4. In psychoanalytical or dynamic creativity, the

interaction of "I, He, Higher Self" is assumed.

5. In the direction of the problem view, creativity is

considered as a mental process that manifests itself

during problem solving. Gilford considered creativity to

be the same thing as divergent thinking.

6. Creativity functions as a single integrated system.

Several factors contribute to the development of

creativity. First, it is determined by the social factor

(macro, meso, micro), secondly, by specific objective

factors (type, type, field of creativity), and thirdly, by

the interaction of conscious (reflexive) and

unconscious (intuitive) processes.

The multifactorial theory of creativity appeared in the

1980s. According to him, creativity results from the

combination of mental abilities and personal

characteristics and environmental factors. The nature

of these factors and their possible interactions vary

depending on the proposed theory. For example,

according to Amabile, there are three components

underlying creativity: motivation, domain-specific

abilities, and processes related to creativity.

Motivation includes the internal and external reasons

that motivate a person to solve a problem and the

person's attitude towards the task. The author calls

being competent in a certain field the existence of

knowledge, skills and talent in this field.

Thus, there are many theories and approaches to

creativity in psychology. Creativity is one of the

important problems of general psychology and

pedagogical psychology. Educating the young

generation with developed creativity is the basis for

the prosperity of the society.

REFERENCES

1.

Илинь

И.П.

Психология

творчества,

креативности, одаренности . : Питер; СПб.; 2009

ISBN 978-5-49807-239-5

2.

Корнилов С. А. Вербальный интеллект и

вербальная креативность как предикторы

успешности обучения. Психология XXI века:

Материалы научно

-

практической конференции

студентов, аспирантов и молодых ученых. СПб.,

2008. С. 271.

3.

Крутецкий В.А. Психология математических

способностей школьников.

-

М.: Просвещение,

1968. -

432 с.

4.

Пономарев

Я.А.

Психология

творческого

мышления.

-

М.: Просвещение, 1960.

-

167 с.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 07-2024

80


American Journal Of Social Sciences And Humanity Research
(ISSN

2771-2141)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

07

P

AGES

:

76-80

OCLC

1121105677
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

5.

Z.T.Nishanova, N.G.Kamilova, D.U.Abdullayeva.

‘‘Rivojlanish psixalogiyasi. Pedagogik psixalogiya”.

Toshkent

2018.

References

Илинь И.П. Психология творчества, креативности, одаренности . : Питер; СПб.; 2009 ISBN 978-5-49807-239-5

Корнилов С. А. Вербальный интеллект и вербальная креативность как предикторы успешности обучения. Психология XXI века: Материалы научно-практической конференции студентов, аспирантов и молодых ученых. СПб., 2008. С. 271.

Крутецкий В.А. Психология математических способностей школьников. - М.: Просвещение, 1968. - 432 с.

Пономарев Я.А. Психология творческого мышления. - М.: Просвещение, 1960. - 167 с.

Z.T.Nishanova, N.G.Kamilova, D.U.Abdullayeva. ‘‘Rivojlanish psixalogiyasi. Pedagogik psixalogiya”. Toshkent – 2018.