Авторы

  • Хасан Ахмедов
    Ташкентский Государственный Экономический Университет

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.digital-economy.92625

Ключевые слова:

davlat ishtiroki mavjud korxonalar xususiy korxonalar qimmatli qogʻozlar aksiya obligatsiya.

Аннотация

Ushbu maqolada davlat ishtiroki mavjud korxonalar qimmatli
qogʻozlari amaliyoti bilan operatsiyalarni oʻrganishning dolzarbligi, mohiyati va
ahamiyati turli iqtisodchi olimlarning fikr-mulohazalari asosida yoritilgan. Davlat
ishtirokidagi korxonalar qimmatli qogʻozlarini tahlil qilishda foydalanilgan tadqiqot
usullariga toʻxtalib oʻtilgan. Davlat ishtirokidagi korxonalar qimmatli qogʻozlarini
oʻrganishda davlatning korxonalar faoliyatiga ta’siri tadqiq qilingan boʻlib, xalqaro
amaliyotda yirik kompaniyalarda davlat ishtiroki hududlar kesimida tahlil qilingan.
Shuningdek, mamlakatimizda davlat ishtirokidagi korxonalarning qimmatli qogʻozlari
bilan operatsiyalari tijorat banklari misolida oʻrganilgan. Davlat ishtirokidagi
korxonalarning qimmatli qogʻozlar bilan bogʻliq operatsiyalari boʻyicha ilmiy
xulosalar berilgan.


background image

485

BUXGALTERIYA HISOBI VA AUDIT

“RAQAMLI IQTISODIYOT” ILMIY-ELEKTRON JURNALI | 6-SON

WWW.INFOCOM.UZ

DAVLAT ISHTIROKI MAVJUD KORXONALARDA QIMMATLI

QOGʻOZLAR AMALIYOTI TAHLILI

Axmedov Xasan

Toshkent davlat iqtisodiyot universiteti

Annotatsiya:

Ushbu maqolada davlat ishtiroki mavjud korxonalar qimmatli

qogʻozlari amaliyoti bilan operatsiyalarni oʻrganishning dolzarbligi, mohiyati va

ahamiyati turli iqtisodchi olimlarning fikr-mulohazalari asosida yoritilgan. Davlat
ishtirokidagi korxonalar qimmat

li qogʻozlarini tahlil qilishda foydalanilgan tadqiqot

usullariga toʻxtalib oʻtilgan. Davlat ishtirokidagi korxonalar qimmatli qogʻozlarini

oʻrganishda davlatning korxonalar faoliyatiga ta’siri tadqiq qilingan boʻlib, xalqaro

amaliyotda yirik kompaniyalarda davlat ishtiroki hududlar kesimida tahlil qilingan.

Shuningdek, mamlakatimizda davlat ishtirokidagi korxonalarning qimmatli qogʻozlari

bilan operatsiyalari tijorat banklari misolida oʻrganilgan. Davlat ishtirokidagi

korxonalarning qimmatli qogʻozlar bilan bogʻliq operatsiyalari boʻyicha ilmiy

xulosalar berilgan.

Tayanch soʻzlar:

davlat ishtiroki mavjud korxonalar, xususiy korxonalar,

qimmatli qogʻozlar, aksiya, obligatsiya.

АНАЛИЗ ПРАКТИКИ ЦЕННЫХ БУМАГ НА СУЩЕСТВУЮЩИХ

ПРЕДПРИЯТИЯХ С ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫМ УЧАСТИЕМ

Ахмедов

Хасан

Ташкентский Государственный Экономический Университет


Аннотация:

В данной статье подчеркивается актуальность, характер и

важность изучения сделок с практикой ценных бумаг государственных

предприятий на основе мнений различных экономистов. Обсуждаются методы

исследования, используемые при анализе ценных бумаг государственных

предприятий. При исследовании ценных бумаг предприятий с государственным

участием изучалось влияние государства на деятельность предприятий, а в

международной практике анализировалось участие государства в крупных

компаниях по регионам. Также на примере коммерческих банков были изучены

операции с ценными бумагами государственных предприятий в нашей стране.

Даны научные выводы по операциям с ценными бумагами государственных

предприятий.


background image

486

BUXGALTERIYA HISOBI VA AUDIT

“RAQAMLI IQTISODIYOT” ILMIY-ELEKTRON JURNALI | 6-SON

WWW.INFOCOM.UZ

Ключевые слова:

государственные предприятия, частные предприятия,

ценные бумаги, акции, облигации.

ANALYSIS OF SECURITIES PRACTICE IN EXISTING ENTERPRISES

WITH STATE PARTICIPATION

Akhmedov Khasan

Tashkent State University of Economics

Abstract:

In this article, the relevance, nature and importance of studying

transactions with the practice of securities of state-owned enterprises is highlighted
based on the opinions of various economists. The research methods used in the analysis
of securities of state-owned enterprises are discussed. In the study of securities of
enterprises with state participation, the influence of the state on the activities of
enterprises was studied, and in international practice, state participation in large
companies was analyzed by region. Also, transactions with securities of state-owned
enterprises in our country were studied on the example of commercial banks. Scientific
conclusions on securities operations of state-owned enterprises are given.

Keywords: state-owned enterprises, private enterprises, securities, shares,

bonds.

INTRODUCTION

Today, state participation in corporate structures is one of the important aspects

affecting their level of development. If we pay attention to the practice of developed
and developing countries, we can see that the participation of the state in corporate
structures is different. In particular, this indicator is at a relatively low level in
developed countries due to the fact that development is based on private ownership,
while in developing countries, this indicator is relatively high due to the fact that
private ownership is not fully formed, and the mechanisms for regulating and
improving the efficiency of corporate structures have not been fully developed by the
state.

In the practice of our country, we can see that a large part of the total capital of

joint-stock companies belongs to the state. Studying and analyzing securities
operations of state-owned enterprises helps to determine the role of state-owned
enterprises, existing obstacles and problems in the development of the securities
market in our country. For this reason, it is important to study the securities operations
of state-owned enterprises in our country.




background image

487

BUXGALTERIYA HISOBI VA AUDIT

“RAQAMLI IQTISODIYOT” ILMIY-ELEKTRON JURNALI | 6-SON

WWW.INFOCOM.UZ

REVIEW OF LITERATURE ON THE SUBJECT

When studying the securities of state-owned enterprises, attention was paid to

the opinions of a number of economists. It was noted by Alexander Abramov,
Alexander Radygin, Maria Chernova that state enterprises include companies that are
directly and indirectly owned by the state and that differ significantly in terms of
efficiency... it is advisable to privatize the shares of the enterprises concerned. This
problem can be solved in several ways, in particular, applying the principles of
corporate governance in state-owned enterprises, increasing the level of corporate
governance in state-owned enterprises, strengthening the monitoring of the activities
of state-owned enterprises by state agencies, setting target indicators for management
groups to reduce costs and increase the efficiency of companies [1].

A group of economists pointed out that the influence of state-owned enterprises

on economic growth is crucial, saying that it depends on the level of institutional
quality, which reflects the internal socio-economic environment: the better the
institutional environment of state-owned enterprises, the higher the overall efficiency
of state-owned enterprises. Will be high [2].

According to Jeremy Schwartz, SOEs are generally defined as companies that

are wholly or partially owned or controlled by the government. According to some
investors, state ownership of enterprises can have a negative impact on the company's
operational aspects, because state-owned companies can be influenced by a wide
range of interests other than profit for shareholders [3].

There are very few state-owned companies in the markets of developed

economies such as the USA, Europe, and Japan, and the practice of public placement
of shares gives corporations the opportunity to conduct their business without direct
government intervention. In the developing markets of countries such as China and
Russia, there are many large state-owned enterprises, that is, there are many joint-
stock companies partially owned by the state in the domestic markets.

Such a system is a source of risk for the economy, because the state can put

pressure on these companies to prioritize the interests of the state over the interests of
other shareholders [4].

Shares representing the state share are also issued by state enterprises and

owned by state enterprises. When a state enterprise issues securities, part of it is held
by a state organization or a holding company authorized by the state [5].

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Methods such as comparison, induction, deduction, analysis, and synthesis

were used in the study and analysis of securities transactions of state-owned
enterprises.


background image

488

BUXGALTERIYA HISOBI VA AUDIT

“RAQAMLI IQTISODIYOT” ILMIY-ELEKTRON JURNALI | 6-SON

WWW.INFOCOM.UZ

ANALYSIS AND RESULTS

Today, we can see that the participation of the state in corporate structures is

different in the countries of the world. If this share is small in developing countries,
we can observe that this share is high in companies in developing countries. If we
analyze the structure of the largest companies in the world, we should note that these
State owned equity securities also include state-owned shares, institutions and the
context of JSCs’ field of activity (Table 1).

Table 1

Shareholders structure of “Ipoteka-bank” ATIB as of 01.01.2024

[6]

List of shareholders

Share in the

charter capital, %

1

OTP Bank Plc.

79,58%

2

Ministry of Economy and Finance of the Republic of

Uzbekistan

19,14%

3

Other legal entities (number of shareholders – 4,627)

0,95%

4

Natural persons (number of shareholders – 14,950)

0,33%

Authorized capital (total number of shareholders -

19,579)

3 834 217 638 941

In this table, we can see the structure of the main shareholders of “Ipoteka-bank”

ATIB as of 01.01.2024. OTP Bank Plc owns the majority of shares with 79.58 percent.
Corresponds to the share. The percentage of shares received by individuals is the lowest
in the table. The total number of shareholders is 19 579. And when it comes to the
number of shares created is 3 834 217 638 941.

Table 2

Shareholders structure of “Ipoteka-bank” ATIB as of 01.01.2024

[7]

Authorized capital

100%

1

natural persons

0,33%

2

legal entities

99,67%

And this table above illustrates the order in which shares are divided between

individuals and legal entities. The share of individuals here is too low, less than 1%.
But more than 99 percent of shares belong to legal entities.





background image

489

BUXGALTERIYA HISOBI VA AUDIT

“RAQAMLI IQTISODIYOT” ILMIY-ELEKTRON JURNALI | 6-SON

WWW.INFOCOM.UZ

Table 3

“Ipoteka-bank” ATIB bonds

[8]

List number

№R0845, 2010 year 19 march

№R0845

-2, 2012 year

6 december

Type, type and form

of issuance of

securities

Interest-bearing undocumented

corporate bonds bearing the

owner's name

Interest-bearing

undocumented

corporate bonds bearing

the owner's name

Status

Turned off

Turned off

Rating

-

-

Nominal value and

number of securities

10 000 000 sum/500

10 000 000 sum/500

The total volume of

the issue (Uzbek

soums)

5 000 000 000,00

5 000 000 000,00

Placement method

Open subscription

Open subscription

Deployment period

April 9, 2010 - March 25, 2011

December 28, 2012 -

December 6, 2013

Expired date

April 2, 2015

December 21, 2017

Processing time, days

1820 days (5 year)

1820 days (5 year)

Issue price

On the first day of the first and

second interest period - nominal

value;

On other days - the sum of

nominal value of bonds and

accumulated interest income;

On the first day of the

first, second, third and

fourth interest period -

nominal value;

On other days - the sum

of nominal value of

bonds and accumulated

interest income;

Coupon

Refinancing rate of the Central

Bank of the Republic of

Uzbekistan

The refinancing rate of

the Central Bank of the

Republic of Uzbekistan

is minus one percent

Principal repayment

The bonds will be redeemed at

the end of the term

The bonds will be

redeemed at the end of

the term



background image

490

BUXGALTERIYA HISOBI VA AUDIT

“RAQAMLI IQTISODIYOT” ILMIY-ELEKTRON JURNALI | 6-SON

WWW.INFOCOM.UZ

From this table it can be seen that “Ipoteka-bank” ATIB bonds are compared in

various categories. For instance, the category for Nominal value and number of
securities is the same in both periods. Changes in categories can be seen in the expired
dates, value of emission and coupon.

Table 4

International bonds of “Ipoteka-bank” ATIB

[9]

International

Securities

Identification

Number (ISIN)

XS2260457754

XS2331929963

Emission level

Without priority

provision

Without priority provision

Status

On process

On process

Format

Reg S

Reg S

Emission rating

S&P: BB- and Fitch:

BB-

Fitch: BB-

Currency

US dollar

Uzbek soum

Denomination

200 000 US dolls.

2 500 000 000 soums

The total volume of

issue

300 mln. US dollar

785 billion Uzbek soums

(equivalent to 75 million US

dollars)

Placement method

Open subscription

Close subscription

Deployment period

November 19, 2020

April 16, 2021 and.

Expiry date

November 19, 2025

April 16, 2024 and.

Duration, days

1826 (5 years)

1096 (3 years)

Issue price

100% (at par)

100% (at par)

Coupon rate

Annual 5,50%

Annual 16,0%

Principal repayment

One time payment at

the end of the term

One time payment at the end of

the term

This table illustrates the important information about international bonds of

“Ipoteka-bank” ATIB by identification number. There are changes in rating, currency,
denomination, total volume of emission, started and expired dates of securities. In
addition, Coupon rate is also different between Uzbekistan and foreign countries.


background image

491

BUXGALTERIYA HISOBI VA AUDIT

“RAQAMLI IQTISODIYOT” ILMIY-ELEKTRON JURNALI | 6-SON

WWW.INFOCOM.UZ

CONCLUSION

By studying transactions related to securities in state-owned enterprises, we can

make the following scientific conclusions:

1.

State-owned enterprises are enterprises with a direct or indirect state share.

In order to eliminate the difference between the performance indicators of private
enterprises and state enterprises, it is desirable to privatize the shares of enterprises
directly and indirectly owned by the state. Analyzing performance indicators in state-
owned enterprises and their development is also important in the development of the
stock market.

2.

State ownership of enterprises can have a negative impact on company

performance, as state-owned companies can be influenced by the interests of another
party outside of profit for shareholders.

3.

In developed countries (USA, Japan, etc.) there are very few state-owned

companies, and the practice of public placement of shares allows companies to carry
out their activities independently. In developing countries such as China and Russia,
the presence of large state-owned enterprises is a risk to the economy, as the state may
pressure these companies to put the interests of the state before the interests of other
shareholders.

4.

If we analyze the structure of the largest companies in the world, we can note

that these companies also include state-owned companies. It can be seen that this issue
is very relevant in global practice, so we can improve the efficiency of operations
related to securities transactions in local enterprises based on the experience of large
companies in developed countries.

REFERENCES

1.

Alexander Abramov, Alexander Radygin, Maria Chernova. State-owned

enterprises in the Russian market: Ownership structure and their role in the economy.
// Russian Journal of Economics, Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2017, Pages 1-23;

2.

Katarzyna Szarzec, Ákos Dombi, Piotr Matuszak. State-owned enterprises

and economic growth: Evidence from the post-Lehman period. // Economic
Modelling, Volume 99, June 2021. –P.20;

3.

Jeremy Schwarts. Emerging Markets and State-Owned Enterprises. //

WisdomTree Research, Decemeber 2014. –P. 12;

4.

Daniel Sotiroff. Be Wary of State-Owned Enterprises. // MORNINGSTAR,

October 9, 2019.

5.

Minkang Gu, Robert C. Art. Securitization of State Ownership: Chinese

Securities Law. // Michigan Journal of International Law, Volume 18, Isue 1, 1996. –
P.128;


Библиографические ссылки

Alexander Abramov, Alexander Radygin, Maria Chernova. State-owned

enterprises in the Russian market: Ownership structure and their role in the economy.

// Russian Journal of Economics, Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2017, Pages 1-23;

Katarzyna Szarzec, Ákos Dombi, Piotr Matuszak. State-owned enterprises

and economic growth: Evidence from the post-Lehman period. // Economic

Modelling, Volume 99, June 2021. –P.20;

Jeremy Schwarts. Emerging Markets and State-Owned Enterprises. //

WisdomTree Research, Decemeber 2014. –P. 12;

Daniel Sotiroff. Be Wary of State-Owned Enterprises. // MORNINGSTAR,

October 9, 2019.

Minkang Gu, Robert C. Art. Securitization of State Ownership: Chinese

Securities Law. // Michigan Journal of International Law, Volume 18, Isue 1, 1996. –

P.128;