Авторы

  • Matluba Saydaliyeva
    PhD student at Alisher Navoi University of Uzbek Language and Literature

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.dptms.115610

Ключевые слова:

film discourse linguistic cognitive frame concept multimodal discourse speech act semantic field.

Аннотация

This article analyzes the concept of film discourse and its linguocognitive properties. It sheds light on the scientific basis on how film discourse is formed through language, thought, and multimodal expression, as well as its relationship with cognitive frames, concepts, scenarios, and emotional reactions. During the analysis, it is explained how language units are processed in the human mind, and what semantic fields are formed through film characters and events, based on examples.


background image

DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN

MODERN SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

42

LINGUOCOGNITIVE FOUNDATIONS OF FILM DISCOURSE

Saydaliyeva Matluba

saydaliyeva1993@mail.ru

PhD student at Alisher Navoi University of

Uzbek Language and Literature

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15761492

Abstract:

This article analyzes the concept of film discourse and its

linguocognitive properties. It sheds light on the scientific basis on how film
discourse is formed through language, thought, and multimodal expression, as
well as its relationship with cognitive frames, concepts, scenarios, and emotional
reactions. During the analysis, it is explained how language units are processed
in the human mind, and what semantic fields are formed through film characters
and events, based on examples.

Keywords:

film discourse, linguistic cognitive, frame, concept, multimodal

discourse, speech act, semantic field.

The formation of new approaches in linguistics and the development of the

scientific paradigm determined the need for a deep analysis of linguistic
phenomena, including such concepts as "text" and "discourse". If in the first half
of the 20th century the main attention of researchers was primarily focused on
the structural features of language, then from the second half of the century
there was a shift in attention to the functioning of language in real
communicative conditions.

In the field of modern linguistics, discourse analysis has become one of the

most comprehensive methodologies. In particular, the profound influence of
cinema on the thinking of society, the semantic layering of its language tools, has
made it an independent object of analysis. Unlike ordinary text, film discourse
has multimodal, interactive and connotative properties, in which, along with
language, visual, auditory and emotional components are combined. Therefore,
its study based on a linguocognitive approach is one of the current scientific
issues.

The concept of film discourse and its characteristics

Cinematic discourse is a type of discourse inherent in the art of cinema,

inextricably linked with other non-linguistic signs (image, facial expressions,
musical background, montage). It constitutes a communicative process between
the screenwriter, director, actor and viewer. Scholars such as VN Toporov, TA
van Dijk, ND Arutyunova, MM Bakhtin consider discourse not limited to


background image

DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN

MODERN SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

43

language alone, but as a contextual and socio-pragmatic system.

1

The main

features of this discourse are:

Multimodal character - through cinema, meaning is created not only

through language, but also through facial expressions, gestures, visual images,
background music, and other semiotic means.

Interactivity – the viewer perceives the film not passively, but cognitively

actively: he understands the context, guesses the intentions of the characters,
and responds emotionally.

Cognitive scripts - in film, reality is often depicted based on a stereotypical

chain of events (scripts), which are associated with pre-existing knowledge and
assumptions in human thinking.

Linguistic features

The linguistic elements in film discourse are specially selected. These

elements are distinguished by the following aspects:

Dialogues are similar to real-life speech, but perform a more dramatic

function. Each line reflects the character's psychological state, social status, and
personality.

Speech acts – in film discourse, directive (command, request), expressive

(emotional), and informative acts often prevail.

Pragmatic devices – context-dependent meanings, irony, metaphor, and

other pragmatic indicators are widely used.

Cognitive aspects

Cognitive linguistics analyzes how film text is perceived in the human mind.

The main concepts in this are:

A frame is a mental schema for understanding a real event. For example, a

"war frame" or a "family frame."

A script is a stereotypical model of a sequence of events. In cinema, a script

not only shapes the plot, but also cognitive expectations.

Also, emotional cognition - that is, the emotional states (fear, joy, disgust)

that arise during the process of watching a film - shapes cognitive reality.

Concepts – through the characters of the film, certain concepts (for

example, "freedom", "justice", "homeland") are manifested and activated in the
mind of the viewer.

Emotional cognition - emotions are not only expressed through film

discourse, but also evoke certain cognitive reactions in the viewer.

Analysis with examples

1

Arutyunova, N.D. (1990). Discourse. V sb. Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia


background image

DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN

MODERN SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

44

For example, in the famous Uzbek film "Mahallada duv-duv gap", one of the

main characters' feelings is: "Don't let the story get out to the neighborhood,
there's something called reputation!"

Analysis: sociocognitive elements: the phrase "talk" - metaphorical

meaning: talk is cognitively interpreted as something that is physically
transmitted.

Cultural code: Reputation is a mental construct, meaning it is not a real

object, but it has a very strong real impact on people.

Collective discourse: The film depicts the neighborhood as a unit of social

consciousness.

Multimodality and semiotic systems

To fully understand film discourse, it is important to analyze it from a

multimodal perspective. Language is the primary, but not the only, tool. The
following also create semantic meaning:

Visual codes (colors, composition, clothing);
Audial codes (background music, sound effects);
Cinema paradigm (film genre, cultural context).
For example, dark colors, slow movement, and soft music evoke a sense of

danger or tragedy in the cognitive mind. The film analyzes national mentality,
cultural values, and visible and invisible processes in the mind.

Cinematic discourse, while being a linguistic tool, is also a screened form of

human thought.

Film discourse analysis combines linguistic and cognitive approaches to

uncover the deep essence of film text. It reveals the inextricable link between
human thought, cultural experience, and linguistic means. In today's era of
globalization, studying the relationship between language and thought through
film discourse is an important direction for modern linguistic research.

References:

1.Arutyunova, N.D. (1990). Discourse. V sb. Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary.
Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia.
2.Van Dyck, T.A. (1989). Yazyk. Poznań. Communication. Moscow: Progress.
3.Kubryakova, E.S. (2004). Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znaniy o zazyke.
Chasti rechi s cognitive eye sight. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury.
4.Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press.
London: Routledge.
5.Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and
Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.


background image

DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN

MODERN SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

45

6.Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
7.Iskandarova, D. (2018). “Linguistic and pragmatic analysis of film discourse”.
Issues in Uzbek linguistics, No. 2.
8.Karimov, O. (2020). “Cognitive Linguistics and Discourse: Theoretical
Approaches”. Philology and Language Teaching, No. 4.
9.Rizayeva, M. (2022). “Cinema Discourse and Multimodal Communication.”
Languages and Intercultural Communication, No. 1.

Библиографические ссылки

Arutyunova, N.D. (1990). Discourse. V sb. Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow: Soviet Encyclopedia.

Van Dyck, T.A. (1989). Yazyk. Poznań. Communication. Moscow: Progress.

Kubryakova, E.S. (2004). Yazyk i znanie: Na puti polucheniya znaniy o zazyke. Chasti rechi s cognitive eye sight. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury.

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News: Discourse and Ideology in the Press. London: Routledge.

Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Iskandarova, D. (2018). “Linguistic and pragmatic analysis of film discourse”. Issues in Uzbek linguistics, No. 2.

Karimov, O. (2020). “Cognitive Linguistics and Discourse: Theoretical Approaches”. Philology and Language Teaching, No. 4.

Rizayeva, M. (2022). “Cinema Discourse and Multimodal Communication.” Languages and Intercultural Communication, No. 1.