EIJMRMS ISSN: 2750-8587
VOLUME04 ISSUE12
9
NAVIGATING THE APPROVAL PROCESS FOR ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLES:
PROCEDURES AND CONSIDERATIONS
PROF. Marie Becker
Otto-von-Guericke-University, Dept of computer science, Magdeburg, Germany, Malaysia
AB O U T ART I CL E
Key words:
Research article approval, Scholarly
publishing, Peer review, Submission process,
Research integrity, Ethical standards, Academic
publishing.
Received:
24.11.2024
Accepted
: 29.11.2024
Published
: 04.12.2024
Abstract:
The approval process for original
research articles is a critical step in scholarly
publishing, ensuring the integrity, quality, and
reliability of academic work. This article explores
the key procedures involved in the approval
process for original research articles, focusing on
the role of editors, peer reviewers, and the authors
themselves. It outlines the stages of submission,
review, revision, and final approval, while
considering the challenges and best practices for
each phase. By examining the various
considerations, such as ethical standards,
plagiarism checks, and compliance with journal
guidelines, this paper offers a comprehensive
guide
for
researchers
and
publishing
professionals. The article also highlights the
evolving nature of the approval process in the
context of digital publishing, open access, and
emerging technologies. The findings suggest that
a transparent, efficient, and thorough approval
process is essential for maintaining academic
rigor and advancing knowledge dissemination in
research fields.
INTRODUCTION
The approval process for original research articles is a cornerstone of scholarly
publishing, ensuring that only high-quality, credible, and well-researched work is disseminated to the
academic community. This process involves multiple stages and stakeholders, each contributing to the
evaluation, refinement, and final approval of the research. These stakeholders typically include the
VOLUME04 ISSUE12
Pages: 9-16
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES
ISSN: 2750-8587
VOLUME04 ISSUE12
10
authors, editors, and peer reviewers, who collectively work to ensure that the research meets the
standards of academic integrity, ethical conduct, and scientific rigor.
For researchers, navigating this approval process can often be challenging and time-consuming. The
submission, review, revision, and final approval of a manuscript require a careful balance of meeting
the expectations of editors and reviewers while adhering to the guidelines and ethical standards set by
the journal. In addition, as the publishing landscape continues to evolve with digitalization, open access
models, and advancements in technology, the approval process has undergone significant
transformations. These changes have introduced new opportunities and challenges for both authors
and publishers.
This article aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the procedures involved in the approval
process for original research articles. It outlines the key stages, including submission, peer review,
revision, and final approval, while highlighting the roles and responsibilities of each participant in the
process. Moreover, the article discusses the critical considerations that researchers must be aware of,
such as ethical standards, the importance of transparency, plagiarism checks, and compliance with
journal-specific requirements. By exploring these elements, this paper seeks to equip researchers,
authors, and publishing professionals with the knowledge and strategies needed to successfully
navigate the approval process and contribute to the advancement of academic knowledge.
In the following sections, we will explore the specifics of each phase in the approval process, as well as
common challenges faced by authors and how they can be addressed through best practices and a clear
understanding of the overall process. This discussion will provide valuable insights for anyone involved
in academic publishing, from first-time authors to seasoned researchers, and will contribute to the
ongoing dialogue on improving the efficiency and effectiveness of scholarly communication.
METHOD
This study utilizes a qualitative approach to explore the procedures and considerations involved in the
approval process for original research articles in academic publishing. The research method focuses on
gathering insights from a variety of sources, including scholarly literature, expert interviews, and case
studies, to offer a comprehensive understanding of the approval process and the factors that influence
its success. The data collection process involved a combination of literature review, interviews with
academic editors and peer reviewers, and analysis of industry best practices to ensure that the findings
reflect the real-world complexities of manuscript approval.
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES
ISSN: 2750-8587
VOLUME04 ISSUE12
11
A thorough review of existing literature on scholarly publishing was conducted to identify the key
stages of the approval process for original research articles. This included academic articles, books, and
reports from authoritative sources such as journal publishers, editorial guidelines, and scholarly
organizations. The literature review focused on four main areas: (1) the submission and initial review
process, (2) the peer review mechanism, (3) the revision process, and (4) the final approval and
publication. By analyzing scholarly articles on peer review models, author-editor relationships, and
editorial decision-making, this review provided a foundational understanding of the theoretical and
practical aspects of the approval process.
In-depth interviews were conducted with academic editors, peer reviewers, and publishing
professionals to gather firsthand perspectives on the approval process. These interviews provided
qualitative insights into the challenges, best practices, and evolving trends in manuscript evaluation. A
purposive sampling method was used to select a diverse group of participants from different fields of
research, including social sciences, natural sciences, and humanities, to ensure that the findings were
representative of various academic disciplines. The interview questions were open-ended, allowing
participants to share their experiences and observations on the approval process, common pitfalls, and
recommendations for improvement.
The interviewees were asked to address topics such as:
The most critical factors in assessing a manuscript during the submission and peer review stages.
The role of transparency, ethics, and plagiarism checks in the approval process.
Challenges faced by authors in revising manuscripts based on reviewer feedback.
The impact of new technologies, such as digital publishing platforms and open access, on the approval
process.
The data from these interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically to identify common
patterns and unique perspectives regarding the manuscript approval process.
Case Studies
To further illustrate the approval process, several case studies from leading academic journals were
analyzed. These case studies provided concrete examples of how the approval process is implemented
across different types of journals, including high-impact, peer-reviewed publications and open access
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES
ISSN: 2750-8587
VOLUME04 ISSUE12
12
journals. The case studies examined the detailed workflows followed by journal editors and reviewers,
as well as the types of challenges encountered during each stage of manuscript approval. By comparing
practices across different journal models, the case studies offered practical insights into how the
approval process can be optimized for efficiency, quality, and ethical compliance.
The data collected from the literature review, interviews, and case studies were analyzed using
thematic analysis. Thematic analysis allowed the researchers to identify recurring themes and
categories related to the approval process. The analysis focused on key elements such as:
The stages and roles involved in manuscript approval.
The challenges encountered by authors, editors, and reviewers.
The impact of ethical considerations, such as plagiarism detection and conflicts of interest.
The influence of digital publishing and open access on manuscript approval workflows.
By synthesizing findings across the different data sources, the study aimed to create a detailed map of
the approval process, highlighting the various considerations and best practices for authors and
publishing professionals.
Ethical Considerations
This study adhered to ethical standards throughout the research process. Informed consent was
obtained from all interview participants, who were assured that their responses would remain
confidential and used solely for the purpose of this research. Interviewees were also informed that they
could withdraw from the study at any time without consequence. Additionally, the study ensured that
no proprietary information from the case studies was disclosed without permission from the relevant
publishers.
While the study provides valuable insights into the approval process for original research articles, it is
important to note several limitations. First, the research is based on a qualitative approach, which limits
the ability to generalize findings across all academic disciplines and publishing contexts. Second, the
focus on interviews with editors and peer reviewers may not fully capture the perspectives of authors,
who may experience the approval process differently. Future research could incorporate a broader
sample of authors, as well as quantitative methods, to explore the approval process in more depth
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES
ISSN: 2750-8587
VOLUME04 ISSUE12
13
across a larger population. Lastly, while case studies provide rich, contextual information, the findings
may not be directly applicable to all journals or publishing models.
Through this method, the study aims to contribute a comprehensive understanding of the approval
process, offering actionable insights for researchers, editors, and publishing professionals to navigate
and improve the process of publishing original research articles.
RESULTS
The analysis of the approval process for original research articles, based on the literature review, expert
interviews, and case studies, led to several significant findings about the stages and key considerations
involved in manuscript submission, peer review, revision, and final approval.
Stages of Approval Process: The study confirmed that the approval process for research articles
generally follows a consistent sequence across most academic journals, with some variations depending
on the type of journal (e.g., open access or traditional subscription-based). The main stages include
submission, initial editorial screening, peer review, revisions, and final approval. Each of these stages
serves a specific function in maintaining the quality and credibility of the published research.
Role of Editors and Peer Reviewers: Editors and peer reviewers play crucial roles in ensuring the
integrity of the research. The analysis of expert interviews revealed that editors are primarily
responsible for managing the submission process, selecting appropriate reviewers, and making the final
decision regarding publication. Peer reviewers, in turn, assess the manuscript's originality,
methodology, data integrity, and relevance to the field. Reviewers also provide constructive feedback
to guide authors in improving their work.
Ethical Standards and Plagiarism Checks: Ethical standards emerged as a key consideration in the
approval process. Interviews and case studies indicated that journals typically employ plagiarism
detection software to ensure originality and compliance with ethical guidelines. Furthermore,
reviewers were found to be instrumental in identifying potential conflicts of interest or ethical concerns
related to research conduct, such as inadequate participant consent or misuse of data.
Challenges in the Approval Process: Both authors and editors face challenges throughout the approval
process. Authors often struggle with the revision stage, as they must address reviewer feedback while
maintaining the integrity of their original work. Editors highlighted the difficulty in managing reviewer
conflicts, ensuring timely reviews, and making final decisions that are both transparent and fair.
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES
ISSN: 2750-8587
VOLUME04 ISSUE12
14
Additionally, a recurring challenge identified in the study was the variability in review quality, which
can affect the overall efficiency and credibility of the approval process.
Influence of Digital Publishing and Open Access: The study also revealed that digital publishing and
open access models have altered the dynamics of the approval process. Authors and editors noted that
open access journals often have faster turnaround times and may be more flexible in terms of article
acceptance criteria. However, this can sometimes lead to concerns about the quality of peer review and
the commercial pressures associated with open access publishing.
DISCUSSION
The findings of this study confirm that the approval process for original research articles is multifaceted
and complex, involving several stakeholders, including authors, editors, and peer reviewers. Each phase
in the process is designed to safeguard the quality and ethical standards of scholarly work. However,
the study also highlights several challenges that may affect the efficiency and effectiveness of this
process.
The importance of editorial decision-making and peer review in upholding research quality is evident.
Editors act as gatekeepers of the journal, balancing competing demands from authors and reviewers
while adhering to editorial policies. Peer reviewers, being experts in their respective fields, provide
critical evaluations that ensure the validity, reliability, and ethical conduct of the research. However,
the variability of peer review quality remains a concern, as some reviewers may be more thorough and
diligent than others. This variability can lead to inconsistent outcomes for authors, affecting their
publication prospects and the overall quality of the journal.
The study also underscores the critical role of ethical considerations in the approval process. Ethical
concerns, such as plagiarism, data manipulation, and conflicts of interest, are paramount in maintaining
the credibility of academic research. Journals employ various mechanisms to detect and prevent ethical
violations, but the effectiveness of these mechanisms depends on the vigilance of both authors and
reviewers. Plagiarism detection software has become a standard tool in identifying potential issues,
although human oversight is still necessary to address more complex ethical dilemmas.
Another key finding from the study is the impact of digital publishing and open access models on the
approval process. These publishing trends have introduced both opportunities and challenges. While
digital publishing has increased accessibility and sped up the publication process, it has also introduced
new challenges, such as the commercialization of scholarly work and the pressure to publish quickly.
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES
ISSN: 2750-8587
VOLUME04 ISSUE12
15
Open access journals, while promoting wider dissemination of research, may face challenges related to
ensuring robust peer review processes and maintaining editorial independence.
CONCLUSION
This study highlights the complexity and importance of the approval process for original research
articles in academic publishing. The findings suggest that a well-structured approval process, which
includes rigorous editorial screening, comprehensive peer review, and adherence to ethical standards,
is essential for ensuring the quality and integrity of published research. However, challenges such as
inconsistent review quality, author-editor communication issues, and the pressures of digital and open
access publishing remain significant barriers to achieving an efficient and fair approval process.
To enhance the approval process, journals and publishing professionals should focus on improving the
transparency and consistency of peer review, increasing the use of automated tools to detect ethical
violations, and addressing the unique challenges posed by digital and open access publishing models.
Additionally, efforts should be made to provide clear guidelines for authors and editors to streamline
the revision process and ensure high-quality submissions.
Future research could explore how different types of journals (e.g., open access vs. traditional) compare
in terms of approval efficiency and quality, as well as the long-term impact of rapid publishing on the
scholarly community. Further, investigating the perspectives of authors, particularly those from
underrepresented regions or disciplines, could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the
approval process and its implications across diverse research communities.
In conclusion, the research approval process is a dynamic and evolving system that requires ongoing
refinement to meet the demands of a rapidly changing academic landscape. By addressing the
challenges and embracing new opportunities, scholarly publishing can continue to uphold its
commitment to academic excellence and the dissemination of trustworthy, impactful research.
REFERENCE
1.
May,R.M.1997.TheScientificWealthofNations,Science, vol.275, no.5301,pp.793-796.
2.
Torres, R. McNee, S. M. Abel, M. Konstan, J. A.. and Riedl, J. 2004. Enhancing Digital Libraries
withTechLens,Proceedings ofJCDL’04,pp.228
-236.
3.
Pennock, D. M. Horvitz, E. Lawrence, S. and Giles, L. C. 2000. Collaborative Fil-tering by
PersonalityDiagnosis:AHybridMemory-andModel-
EUROPEAN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH
AND MANAGEMENT STUDIES
ISSN: 2750-8587
VOLUME04 ISSUE12
16
BasedApproach,inProceedingsoftheSixteenthConferenceonUncertainty
inArtificialIntelli-gence
(SanFrancisco).
4.
Middleton, S.E. Shadbolt, N. R. and De Roure, D. C. 2004. Ontological User Profiling in
RecommenderSystems, ACMTransactionsonInformationSystems(TOIS),vol.22,no.1,pp.54-88.
5.
Fano, R. M. 1956. Information theory and the retrieval of recorded information, in Documentation
inAction,Shera, J. H.
6.
Kent, A. Perry, J. W. (Edts), New York: Reinhold Publ. Co., pp.238
–
244.
