European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
01
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
1-6
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
03 March 2025
ACCEPTED
02 April 2025
PUBLISHED
01 May 2025
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue05 2025
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Entrepreneurial Posture
and Its Strategic Impact on
Business Success and
Growth
Fiona McDonald
Faculty of Business, Economics and Law, University of Sydney, Australia
Abstract:
This study synthesizes existing literature to
comprehensively examine the aggregated effect of
entrepreneurial orientation (EO) on enterprise
performance. Drawing upon a wide range of empirical
studies conducted across diverse industries and
geographical contexts, this review analyzes the
multifaceted relationship between EO
–
encompassing
innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking, competitive
aggressiveness, and autonomy
–
and various
dimensions of organizational success. By aggregating
findings from prior research [1], [3], [7], [12], [18], [25],
[29], [31], this article provides a robust understanding of
how a firm's entrepreneurial posture collectively drives
improved performance outcomes. The analysis
identifies key mediating and moderating factors that
influence this relationship, such as market orientation
[10], [16], [44], innovation capabilities [21], [22], total
quality management [2], [3], and environmental
dynamism [16]. The findings highlight the consistent
and significant positive impact of a strong EO on various
aspects of business performance, offering valuable
insights for both academics and practitioners seeking to
enhance
organizational
effectiveness
through
entrepreneurial initiatives.
Keywords:
Entrepreneurial
Orientation,
Firm
Performance,
Meta-Analysis,
Literature
Review,
Innovation, Proactiveness, Risk-Taking, Competitive
Aggressiveness, Autonomy.
Introduction:
Entrepreneurship is widely recognized as
a critical engine for economic growth and organizational
prosperity [35], [39].1 At the firm level, entrepreneurial
orientation (EO) encapsulates the strategic inclination
of an organization towards entrepreneurial activities
[17], [28].2 This construct, typically conceptualized as a
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
2
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
multidimensional
phenomenon
comprising
innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking, competitive
aggressiveness, and autonomy [27], [36], has garnered
significant attention in management research for its
potential to drive superior business performance [26],
[32].3
Extensive empirical research has explored the link
between EO and various measures of firm
performance, including financial performance, market
share, growth, and overall effectiveness [4], [8], [15],
[20]. While numerous studies have individually
demonstrated a positive relationship between EO and
performance, the magnitude and consistency of this
effect can vary across different contexts and industries
[24], [29]. This necessitates a comprehensive
understanding of the aggregated influence of EO on
business success, considering the interplay of its
various dimensions and the contextual factors that
may shape this relationship.
This article aims to address this gap by synthesizing
existing literature to unveil the consolidated effect of
EO on enterprise performance. By drawing upon a
broad spectrum of empirical studies [1], [3], [7], [12],
[18], [25], [29], [31], this review provides a holistic
perspective on how a firm's overall entrepreneurial
posture contributes to improved organizational
outcomes. Furthermore, it explores key mediating
mechanisms and moderating influences that can either
amplify or attenuate the EO-performance nexus, such
as market orientation [10], [16], [44], innovation
capabilities [21], [22], total quality management [2],
[3], and environmental dynamism [16]. This
aggregated analysis offers valuable insights for both
academic scholars seeking to advance the theoretical
understanding of entrepreneurship and practitioners
aiming to leverage entrepreneurial strategies for
enhanced business performance.
Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO): A Multidimensional
Construct
The concept of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) has
evolved significantly since its initial conceptualization
[34], [38]. Covin and Slevin [17] provided a seminal
definition, characterizing EO as the processes,
practices, and decision-making styles that managers
use to act entrepreneurially. They identified three
primary dimensions: innovativeness (a willingness to
support new ideas, experimentation, and creative
processes), proactiveness (an anticipatory and
forward-looking approach, involving seizing new
opportunities and initiating change), and risk-taking (a
propensity to commit significant resources to
opportunities with a reasonable chance of costly
failure).4
Later, Lumpkin and Dess [27] expanded this framework
by adding two more dimensions: competitive
aggressiveness (an intensity to directly and intensely
challenge competitors to achieve entry or improve
position) and autonomy (the fostering of independent
action and the empowerment of individuals or teams to
bring forth and pursue ideas).5 This five-dimensional
conceptualization of EO has become widely adopted in
entrepreneurship research [6], [19], [23].6 Each
dimension represents a distinct facet of a firm's
entrepreneurial posture, and their combined effect is
believed to significantly influence organizational
outcomes [30].
The Link Between Entrepreneurial Orientation and
Enterprise Performance
The theoretical underpinning for the positive
relationship between EO and firm performance lies in
the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm [5]. The RBV
posits that firms can achieve a sustained competitive
advantage by leveraging valuable, rare, inimitable, and
non-substitutable resources and capabilities.7 An
entrepreneurial orientation can be considered a
valuable organizational capability that enables firms to
identify and exploit new opportunities, develop
innovative products and services, and respond
proactively to market changes [33], [40].8 These
entrepreneurial activities can lead to improved
efficiency, enhanced market position, and ultimately,
superior financial and operational performance [13],
[41].
Numerous empirical studies across various industries
and geographical contexts have provided evidence
supporting this positive relationship. For instance,
studies on SMEs in Malaysia [8], Saudi Arabia [3], and
emerging economies [6] have found a significant
positive impact of EO on different measures of business
performance.9 Similarly, research on Islamic banks in
Yemen [4] and crafts and arts SMEs in Indonesia [1] has
also corroborated this finding. These studies suggest
that firms exhibiting a strong entrepreneurial
orientation are more likely to achieve higher levels of
profitability, growth, and market competitiveness.10
Mediating and Moderating Factors
While the direct effect of EO on performance has been
extensively studied, researchers have also explored the
mediating and moderating factors that can influence
this relationship.11
Mediating Factors:
•
Innovation Capabilities: A strong EO often
fosters a culture of innovation within the organization,
leading to the development of new products, services,
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
3
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
and processes.12 Innovation, in turn, has a direct
positive impact on firm performance by creating new
market opportunities and enhancing competitive
advantage [21], [22], [42].
•
Market Orientation: The combination of an
entrepreneurial mindset with a strong focus on
understanding and responding to customer needs and
market dynamics can significantly enhance firm
performance. Market orientation helps firms to
effectively channel their entrepreneurial efforts
towards value-creating activities that resonate with
the market [10], [16], [44].
•
Opportunity Recognition: An entrepreneurial
orientation equips firms with the alertness and
cognitive frameworks necessary to identify and
evaluate new business opportunities.13 Effective
opportunity recognition acts as a crucial intermediary
step between EO and the subsequent exploitation of
these opportunities, leading to improved performance
[5].14
•
Entrepreneurial Competence: The skills and
abilities of entrepreneurs and managers play a vital
role in translating an entrepreneurial orientation into
tangible performance outcomes [1].15 Entrepreneurial
competence can mediate the relationship between EO
and performance by facilitating the effective
implementation of entrepreneurial strategies.16
Moderating Factors:
•
Environmental Uncertainty: The level of
dynamism and complexity in the external environment
can moderate the impact of EO on performance.17 In
highly uncertain environments, a strong EO,
particularly the dimensions of proactiveness and risk-
taking, may be even more critical for navigating
challenges and capitalizing on emerging opportunities
[16].
•
Organizational
Culture:
The
prevailing
organizational culture can either support or hinder the
manifestation of an entrepreneurial orientation.18 A
culture that values experimentation, autonomy, and
initiative is likely to amplify the positive effects of EO
on performance [6].
•
Total Quality Management (TQM): The
implementation of TQM principles, with its emphasis
on continuous improvement and customer focus, can
complement an entrepreneurial orientation. TQM can
provide the operational efficiencies and quality
standards necessary to effectively leverage the
outcomes of entrepreneurial initiatives [2], [3].
•
Firm Size and Age: The relationship between
EO and performance may vary depending on the size
and age of the firm. For instance, the impact of EO
might be more pronounced in smaller and younger firms
that are actively seeking growth and market
establishment [29].
METHODOLOGY
This article adopts a comprehensive literature review
approach to synthesize existing research on the
relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and
enterprise performance. A systematic search was
conducted across prominent academic databases,
including Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar,
using relevant keywords such as "entrepreneurial
orientation,"
"firm
performance,"
"business
performance," "SME," "innovation," "proactiveness,"
"risk-taking,"
"competitive
aggressiveness,"
and
"autonomy."
The search focused primarily on peer-reviewed journal
articles published in English. The inclusion criteria for
the reviewed studies were: (1) empirical research that
explicitly examines the relationship between EO (or its
dimensions) and a measure of firm performance; (2)
studies that clearly define and operationalize the EO
construct, preferably using established scales such as
those developed by Covin and Slevin [17] or Lumpkin
and Dess [27]; and (3) studies that employ quantitative
or qualitative methodologies to analyze the EO-
performance nexus.
The selected articles were carefully analyzed to extract
key information, including the conceptualization of EO
used, the measures of firm performance employed, the
research context (industry, geographical location, firm
size), the main findings regarding the direction and
significance of the EO-performance relationship, and
the identified mediating and moderating factors. The
findings from these individual studies were then
synthesized and aggregated to provide a comprehensive
overview of the consolidated effect of EO on business
success. Special attention was paid to identifying
consistent patterns, contradictory findings, and areas
requiring further research.
DISCUSSION
The synthesis of the reviewed literature reveals a
consistently positive and significant relationship
between entrepreneurial orientation and various
dimensions of enterprise performance [1], [3], [7], [12],
[18], [25], [29], [31]. Firms exhibiting a strong inclination
towards innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking,
competitive aggressiveness, and autonomy tend to
achieve higher levels of financial performance, including
profitability and revenue growth [4], [15], [20], [43].
Furthermore, a strong EO is associated with improved
market position, increased market share, and enhanced
overall organizational effectiveness [8], [26], [32].19
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
4
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
The individual dimensions of EO also play distinct roles
in driving performance.20 Innovativeness enables
firms to develop novel products and services, leading
to competitive differentiation and access to new
markets [9], [42].21 Proactiveness allows firms to
anticipate market trends and capitalize on emerging
opportunities before competitors, resulting in first-
mover advantages [12], [18].22 Risk-taking, when
calculated and informed, facilitates bold initiatives and
the pursuit of high-potential ventures [20], [36].
Competitive aggressiveness helps firms to gain market
share and outperform rivals through strategic actions
and responses [17], [27].23 Autonomy fosters
employee initiative and creativity, leading to more
agile and responsive organizations [6], [23].24
The review also highlights the crucial role of mediating
factors in explaining the EO-performance link.
Innovation capabilities consistently emerge as a
significant mediator, suggesting that EO drives
performance partly by fostering a firm's ability to
innovate [21], [22]. Market orientation acts as another
key mediator, indicating that the positive effects of EO
are amplified when firms are also strongly focused on
understanding and responding to market needs [10],
[16], [44].25 Opportunity recognition serves as a vital
link, as an entrepreneurial mindset enables firms to
identify and exploit valuable opportunities, ultimately
leading to better performance [5], [19].
Furthermore, the analysis identifies several important
moderating factors that can influence the strength and
direction of the EO-performance relationship.
Environmental uncertainty often strengthens the
positive impact of EO, particularly the proactive and
risk-taking dimensions, as firms need to be more
entrepreneurial to thrive in dynamic and unpredictable
environments [16].26 Organizational culture plays a
supportive role, with entrepreneurial cultures
fostering the implementation and effectiveness of EO
[6]. The integration of total quality management
practices can also enhance the positive effects of EO by
providing the necessary operational framework for
innovation and efficiency [2], [3].27 The stage of firm
development and industry characteristics can also
influence the EO-performance nexus, suggesting the
need for contingency-based approaches [14], [29].
CONCLUSION
This comprehensive literature review provides a robust
understanding
of
the
aggregated
effect
of
entrepreneurial
orientation
on
enterprise
performance. The findings consistently demonstrate a
positive and significant relationship between a firm's
entrepreneurial posture and its success across various
dimensions. By synthesizing a large div of empirical
research [1], [3], [7], [12], [18], [25], [29], [31], this
article underscores the importance of cultivating an
entrepreneurial orientation as a strategic imperative for
enhancing organizational effectiveness.
The study also highlights the critical role of mediating
factors such as innovation capabilities, market
orientation, and opportunity recognition in explaining
how EO translates into improved performance.
Moreover, it identifies key moderating factors, including
environmental uncertainty, organizational culture, and
total quality management, which can either amplify or
attenuate this relationship.
Implications for Theory: This review contributes to the
entrepreneurship literature by providing a consolidated
view of the EO-performance nexus. It reinforces the
multidimensional nature of EO and underscores the
importance of considering its various dimensions in
understanding its impact on performance. The
identification of key mediating and moderating factors
provides avenues for further theoretical development
and the refinement of conceptual models linking EO to
organizational outcomes.
Implications for Practice: The findings offer valuable
insights for managers and entrepreneurs seeking to
enhance their firm's performance. Cultivating a strong
entrepreneurial
orientation,
characterized
by
innovativeness, proactiveness, risk-taking, competitive
aggressiveness, and autonomy, can be a powerful driver
of success. Organizations should also focus on
developing complementary capabilities, such as
innovation and market orientation, to fully leverage
their entrepreneurial posture. Furthermore, managers
should be mindful of the contextual factors, such as
environmental dynamism and organizational culture,
that can influence the effectiveness of their
entrepreneurial initiatives.
Limitations and Future Research: While this review
provides a comprehensive overview, it is subject to
certain limitations inherent in literature synthesis.
Future research could benefit from employing meta-
analytic techniques to quantitatively assess the
magnitude and consistency of the EO-performance
relationship across different contexts. Longitudinal
studies are also needed to examine the dynamic and
potentially lagged effects of EO on performance.
Furthermore, exploring the interplay between different
dimensions of EO and their differential impact on
various performance outcomes would be a valuable
avenue for future inquiry. Investigating the role of other
potential mediating and moderating factors, such as
social capital and technological capabilities, could also
provide a more nuanced understanding of the complex
relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
5
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
enterprise performance.
REFERENCES
Aisyah, S., Musa, C. I., & Ramli, A. (2017). Effect of
characteristics
and
entrepreneurial orientation
towards entrepreneurship competence and crafts and
arts SMEs business performance in Makassar.
International Review of Management and Marketing,
7(2),
166
–
173.
https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/artic
le/view/4019
Al-Dhaafri, H. S., & Al-Swidi, A. (2016). The impact of
total quality management and entrepreneurial
orientation
on
organizational
performance.
International Journal of Quality & Reliability
Management, 33(5).
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijqrm-
Ali, G. A., Hilman, H., & Gorondutse, A. H. (2020). Effect
of entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation and
total quality management on performance: Evidence
from Saudi SMEs. Benchmarking: An International
Journal,
27(4),
1503
–
1531.
https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-08-2019-0391
Al-Swidi, A. K., & Al-Hosam, A. (2012). The effect of
entrepreneurial orientation on the organizational
performance: A study on the Islamic banks in Yemen
using the partial least squares approach. Arabian
Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(1), 73
–
84.
https://doi.org/10.12816/0002244
Anwar, M., Clauss, T., & Issah, W. B. (2022).
Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture
performance in emerging markets: The mediating role
of opportunity recognition. Review of Managerial
Science,
16(3),
769
–
796.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00457-w
Arabeche, Z., Soudani, A., Brahmi, M., Aldieri, L., Vinci,
C. P., & Abdelli, M. E. (2022). Entrepreneurial
orientation, organizational culture and business
performance in SMEs: Evidence from emerging
economy.
Sustainability,
14(9),
5160.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095160
Arellano, M. (2022). Effect of entrepreneurial
orientation on enterprise performance: Basis for
microenterprise community mobile app development.
International Journal of Research Publications, 104(1),
1186
–
1204.
https://doi.org/10.47119/ijrp1001041720223567
Arshad, A. S., Rasli, A., Arshad, A. A., & Zain, Z. M.
(2014). The impact of entrepreneurial orientation on
business performance: A study of technology-based
SMEs in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral
Sciences,
130,
46
–
53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.006
Avlonitis, G. J., & Salavou, H. E. (2007). Entrepreneurial
orientation of SMEs, product innovativeness, and
performance. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 566
–
575.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.01.001
Baker, W. E., & Sinkula, J. M. (2009). The complementary
effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial
orientation on profitability in small businesses. Journal
of Small Business Management, 47(4), 443
–
464.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2009.00278.x
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained
competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1),
99
–
120.
https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Bedi, H. S. (2018). A contingency approach to
proactiveness - Business performance relationship.
Indian
Journal of Marketing, 48(12), 34
–
49.
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2018/v48/i12/139555
Bermudez-Hernandez, J., Valencia-Arias, A., &
Montano-Arias, W. M. (2021). Conceptual model for
innovation in the approach of market - oriented
strategies. Indian Journal of Marketing, 51(12), 8
–
25.
https://doi.org/10.17010/ijom/2021/v51/i12/167217
Cheng, P., Wu, S., & Xiao, J. (2025). Exploring the impact
of entrepreneurial orientation and market orientation
on entrepreneurial performance in the context of
environmental uncertainty. Scientific Reports, 15,
Article no. 1913.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-
Cho, Y. H., & Lee, J.-H. (2018). Entrepreneurial
orientation,
entrepreneurial
education
and
performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and
Entrepreneurship,
12(2),
124
–
134.
https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-05-2018-0028
Cho, Y. H., & Lee, J.-H. (2020). A study on the effects of
entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation on
financial performance: Focusing on mediating effects of
market orientation. Sustainability, 12(11), 4594.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114594
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model
of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship
Theory
and
Practice,
16(1),
7
–
26.
https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
Criado-Gomis, A., Iniesta-Bonillo, M. A., & Cervera-
Taulet,
A.
(2018).
Sustainable
entrepreneurial
orientation within an intrapreneurial context: Effects on
business performance. International Entrepreneurship
and
Management
Journal,
14(2),
295
–
308.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0503-x
Cuevas-Vargas, H., Parga-Montoya, N., & Fernandez-
Escobedo, R. (2019). Effects of entrepreneurial
orientation on business performance: The mediating
role of customer satisfaction-A formative-reflective
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research
and Management Studies
6
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijmrms
European International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies
model
analysis.
SAGE
Open,
9(2).
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019859088
Donbesuur, F., Boso, N., & Hultman, M. (2020). The
effect of entrepreneurial orientation on new venture
performance: Contingency roles of entrepreneurial
actions. Journal of Business Research, 118, 150
–
161.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.042
Fan, M., Qalati, S. A., Khan, M. A., Shah, S. M., Ramzan,
M., & Khan, R. S. (2021). Effects of entrepreneurial
orientation on social media adoption and SME
performance: The moderating role of innovation
capabilities. PLoS ONE, 16(4), Article ID e0247320.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247320
Fang, G. G., Qalati, S. A., Ostic, D., Shah, S. M., & Mirani,
M. A. (2022). Effects of entrepreneurial orientation,
social media, and innovation capabilities on SME
performance in emerging countries: A mediated-
moderated model. Technology Analysis & Strategic
Management,
34(11),
1326
–
1338.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2021.1957816
Farooq, R. (2014). A clever approach to measure
organizational
performance:
An
overview.
Prabandhan: Indian Journal of Management, 7(5), 34
–
46.
https://doi.org/10.17010/pijom/2014/v7i5/59321
Frank, H., Kessler, A., & Fink, M. (2010).
Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance
- A replication study. Schmalenbach Business Review,
62(2), 175
–
198. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03396804
Hair Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E.
(2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson
Prentice Hall.
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper
echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top
managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2),
193
–
206.
https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
Hughes, M., & Morgan, R. E. (2007). Deconstructing the
relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and
business performance at the embryonic stage of firm
growth. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(5),
651
–
661.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.003
Jalali, A., Jaafar, M., & Ramayah, T. (2014).
Entrepreneurial orientation and performance: The
interaction effect of customer capital. World Journal of
Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable
Development,
10(1),
48
–
68.
https://doi.org/10.1108/wjemsd-05-2013-0030
Jebna, A. K., & Baharudin, A. S. (2015). The impact of
entrepreneurial orientation on manufacturing SME
performance with the contingent effect of e-
commerce in Malaysia. Advances in Environmental
Biology,
9(5),
24
–
27.
https://www.aensiweb.net/AENSIWEB/aeb/aeb/2015/
April/24-27.pdf
Kajalo, S., & Lindblom, A. (2015). Market orientation,
entrepreneurial orientation and business performance
among small retailers. International Journal of Retail &
Distribution
Management,
43(7),
580
–
596.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijrdm-04-2014-0044
