Авторы

  • Salohiddinova Xosiyat Ali qizi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.esiiw.124487

Ключевые слова:

active learning student engagement higher education teaching methods collaborative learning student performance.

Аннотация

 This article examines the influence of active learning strategies on academic performance and student engagement. This article employed a methodology that integrates quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to inestigate the effects 
of active learning in greater detail. The findings suggest a significant increase in student engagement and motivation, as well as an improvement in academic performance and participation in class activities. The essential information underscores that students 
appreciate the interactive nature of effective teaching methods, such as collaborative projects and group discussions, despite the presence of certain challenges associated with the transition from passive to active learning and time management. This study 
examines the advantages of active learning and offers potential solutions to the challenges that educators may encounter when attempting to implement these \techniques in the classroom.


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-71

Часть–2_ июня–2025

183

2181-

3187

BOOSTING STUDENT INVOLVEMENT WITH ACTIVE LEARNING

TECHNIQUES IN HIGHER EDUCATION

Salohiddinova Xosiyat Ali qizi and

Sayliyeva Gulchiroy Sohibjon qizi

Annotation. This article examines the influence of active learning strategies on

academic performance and student engagement. This article employed a methodology

that integrates quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews to investigate the effects

of active learning in greater detail. The findings suggest a significant increase in student

engagement and motivation, as well as an improvement in academic performance and

participation in class activities. The essential information underscores that students

appreciate the interactive nature of effective teaching methods, such as collaborative

projects and group discussions, despite the presence of certain challenges associated

with the transition from passive to active learning and time management. This study

examines the advantages of active learning and offers potential solutions to the

challenges that educators may encounter when attempting to implement these

techniques in the classroom.

Keywords: active learning, student engagement, higher education, teaching methods,

collaborative learning, student performance.

Annotatsiya. Ushbu maqola faol o‘rganish strategiyalarining talabalar ishtiroki va

akademik samaradorligiga ta’sirini tahlil qiladi. Ushbu maqola faol o‘rganishning

ta’sirini chuqurroq o‘rganish uchun miqdoriy so‘rov va sifatli so‘rovlarni birlashtirgan

inkorporativ metodologiyadan foydalanilgan. Kashfiyotlar talabalarning faolligi va

rag‘batlantirishning sezilarli darajada kengayishini, shuningdek, dars faoliyatiga jalb

qilish va o‘quv natijalarini kuchaytirishni ko‘rsatadi. Kerakli ma’lumotlar shuni

ta’kidlaydiki, talabalar samarali o‘qitish usullarining interfaol xususiyatini, masalan,

guruh muhokamalari va hamkorlikdagi loyihalarni qadrlashadi, garchi vaqtni

boshqarish bilan bog‘liq ba’zi to‘siqlar va passivdan faol o‘rganishga o‘tish qayd

etilgan. Ushbu tadqiqot faol ta’limning ijobiy ta’sirini muhokama qiladi va


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-71

Часть–2_ июня–2025

184

2181-

3187

shuningdek, o‘qituvchilar ushbu usullarni amaliyotga tatbiq etishda duch kelishi

mumkin bo‘lgan qiyinchiliklarni hal qiladi.

Kalit so‘zlar: faol o‘rganish, talabalarning faolligi , oliy ta’lim , o‘qitish usullari,

hamkorlikda o‘rganish, talabalar faoliyati.

Introduction. Higher education institutions are increasingly addressing the deficiencies

of students in passive learning environments and critical thinking abilities, resulting in

the proliferation of student-centered pedagogical approaches. Conventional classrooms

generally restrict students to passive listening and note-taking, which do not

sufficiently interest them or promote profound learning. Conversely, active learning

strategies—such as conversations, problem-solving, and collaborative projects that

engage students actively in the learning process—have garnered significant attention

as successful alternatives [Prince, 2004].This article examines the influence of various

tactics on student engagement, seeking to comprehend their cognitive (knowledge

acquisition) and effective (emotional and motivational) dimensions of learning.

Methods. Recent research underscores the advantages of active learning; yet, its

implementation varies across many disciplines and educational contexts. Although

numerous instructors have included active learning into their pedagogy,uncertainties

persist concerning the most efficacious techniques to augment student engagement.

This research examined the efficacy of active learning strategies in higher education

courses and their direct influence on student engagement and academic performance.

This research employed a mixed-methods strategy, combining quantitative surveys

with qualitative interviews to thoroughly evaluate student participation. The research,

conducted at a large public institution with over 5000 undergraduates, involved 600

students from various disciplines, including foreign language literature, and philology

faculty, all participating in classes that employed active learning strategies throughout

the semester. Active learning methodologies were incorporated into the syllabus for

one semester. The strategies encompassed: Students were organized into small groups

to deliberate on essential concepts and implement them in practical situations. Students

collaborated on assignments necessitating investigation, analysis, andpresentation of


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-71

Часть–2_ июня–2025

185

2181-

3187

their findings to the class. Students were prompted to elucidate topics to their friends,

so enhancing comprehension through instruction. Students were assigned real-world

challenges to address collaboratively, fostering critical thinking and teamwork.

Surveys administered before and after the course assessed variations in student

participation, motivation, and academic performance. The questionnaires comprised

Likert-scale inquiries regarding class participation, enthusiasm for learning, and

perceived skill enhancement. Semi- structured interviews were performed with 30

students and 4 faculty members to provide insights into their perceptions of active

learning practices. The interviews examined students’ levels of participation, the

efficacy of the activities, and theproblems they faced. The collected data demonstrated

substantial evidence of the beneficial impacts of active learning on student

engagement. A substantial rise in student involvement occurred following the use of

active learning techniques. The average student involvement score increased from 3 to

4 on a 5-point scale following the intervention. Participation motivation in classroom

discussions rose by 20%, with 80% of students indicating enhanced engagement

compared to conventional lecture forms. Students additionally indicated an

enhancement in academic achievement. Students engaged in active learning activities

shown a 15% enhancement in their final grades, relative to students in control groups

who did not partake in such methods. Students indicated a heightened connection to

the curriculum when they could associate theoretical concepts with real-world

situations. The participants appreciated the interactive elements of the course,

observing that group discussions offered many viewpoints on problem-solving. Faculty

noted heightened participation levels, with students exhibiting an improved

understanding of course material. Results and Discussion. Students identified problems

including good time management during group work and the initial discomfort

associated with transitioning from passive listening to active participation. Concerns

were also expressed on the balance between solo work and group tasks. The study's

findings corroborate prior studies demonstrating the benefits of active learning in

enhancing student engagement and academic achievement. As it was


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-71

Часть–2_ июня–2025

186

2181-

3187

emphasized(2014), active learning fosters teamwork and enhances cognitive

engagement. Students exhibited heightened motivation and engagement during active

participation, resulting in a significant enhancement in academic achievement.

Notwithstanding the identified hurdles, such as the necessity for staff training and early

student unease regarding the switch to active learning, the overall advantages in

engagement and learning results were substantial.

Conclusion. This study illustrates that active learning methodologiesenhance student

involvement and academic performance in higher education. They promote teamwork,

critical thinking, and practical problem-solving, hence improving cognitive and

emotional learning outcomes.

References

1. Freeman, S., O’Connor, K. M., Parks, J. M., Cunningham, M. H., & Dirks,C. (2014).

The impact of active learning on student performance: A meta-analysis. CSE Reports,

10(5), 1-20.

2. Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research.Journal of

Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.

3. Abulkosimovna, E.Z. (2022) ‘Synonymous analysis of professional words in

English and Uzbek’, Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 02(05), pp. 15–

22. doi:10.37547/socialfsshj-02-05-03.

4. Mamatkulova, F., Azamov, A., & Eshquvvatov, B. (2024). The features in foreign

languages and learning processes. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti

konferensiyalari, 130-134.

5. Zarqarayeva, N., Zaripbayeva, S., & Mamatkulova, F. (2024). Ta’lim va ta’limda

ta’lim texnologiyalari. Ko‘p tillilik muhitida xorijiy tillarni rivojlantirishning

innovatsion

va

integrativ

muammolari,

1(01),

207–

213.https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11255760.

6. Rashidova, G., & Khilola, K. (2024). THE ROLE OF INTONATION AND STRESS

IN

MEANING.

TANQIDIY

NAZAR,

TAHLILIY

TAFAKKUR

VA.

INNOVATSION G ‘OYALAR, 1(3), 72-75.


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-71

Часть–2_ июня–2025

187

2181-

3187

7. Abdramanov, S., Muratbaev, N., Joldasova, A., & Sultanova, M. (2025). GENERAL

INFORMATION ABOUT THE HISTORY OF PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING.

Modern Science and Research, 4(4), 625-629.

8. Abulkosimovna, E. Z. (2022). Synonymous analysis of professional words in

English and Uzbek. Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 2(05), 15-22.

9. Gulomova, R. (2020). Sociolinguistic competence of L2 students. TJE- Tematics

journal of Education ISSN, 2249-9822.

10. Alimdjanovna, K. M. (2024). ADVANTAGES OF SCAFFOLDING IN

TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences,

Philosophy and Culture, 4(5-1), 163-166.

11. Kholbutayeva, S., & Gulshoda, R. (2025). PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATIONS:

HOW TO ENHANCE STUDENT ENGAGEMENTTHROUGH KAHOOT?. YANGI

O ‘ZBEKISTON, YANGI TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI, 2(7), 141-145.

12. Koppelman, P., & Gulomova, R. (2024). Amerika ingliz tilidagi leksik

o'zgarishlarning madaniyatlararo muloqotga ta'siri. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahontillari

universiteti konferensiyalari, 619-624.

13. Zarqarayeva, N., Zaripbayeva, S., & Mamatkulova, F. (2024). Educational

technologies in teaching and learning. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti

konferensiyalari, 207-213.

Библиографические ссылки

Freeman, S., O’Connor, K. M., Parks, J. M., Cunningham, M. H., & Dirks,C. (2014).

The impact of active learning on student performance: A meta-analysis. CSE Reports,

(5), 1-20.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research.Journal of

Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.

Abulkosimovna, E.Z. (2022) ‘Synonymous analysis of professional words in

English and Uzbek’, Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 02(05), pp. 15

doi:10.37547/socialfsshj-02-05-03.

Mamatkulova, F., Azamov, A., & Eshquvvatov, B. (2024). The features in foreign

languages and learning processes. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti

konferensiyalari, 130-134.

Zarqarayeva, N., Zaripbayeva, S., & Mamatkulova, F. (2024). Ta’lim va ta’limda

ta’lim texnologiyalari. Ko‘p tillilik muhitida xorijiy tillarni rivojlantirishning

innovatsion

va

integrativ

muammolari,

(01),

Rashidova, G., & Khilola, K. (2024). THE ROLE OF INTONATION AND STRESS

IN MEANING. TANQIDIY NAZAR, TAHLILIY TAFAKKUR VA.

INNOVATSION G ‘OYALAR, 1(3), 72-75.7. Abdramanov, S., Muratbaev, N., Joldasova, A., & Sultanova, M. (2025). GENERAL

INFORMATION ABOUT THE HISTORY OF PEDAGOGICAL TRAINING.

Modern Science and Research, 4(4), 625-629.

Abulkosimovna, E. Z. (2022). Synonymous analysis of professional words in

English and Uzbek. Frontline Social Sciences and History Journal, 2(05), 15-22.

Gulomova, R. (2020). Sociolinguistic competence of L2 students. TJE- Tematics

journal of Education ISSN, 2249-9822.

Alimdjanovna, K. M. (2024). ADVANTAGES OF SCAFFOLDING IN

TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences,

Philosophy and Culture, 4(5-1), 163-166.

Kholbutayeva, S., & Gulshoda, R. (2025). PEDAGOGICAL INNOVATIONS:

HOW TO ENHANCE STUDENT ENGAGEMENTTHROUGH KAHOOT?. YANGI

O ‘ZBEKISTON, YANGI TADQIQOTLAR JURNALI, 2(7), 141-145.

Koppelman, P., & Gulomova, R. (2024). Amerika ingliz tilidagi leksik

o'zgarishlarning madaniyatlararo muloqotga ta'siri. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahontillari

universiteti konferensiyalari, 619-624.

Zarqarayeva, N., Zaripbayeva, S., & Mamatkulova, F. (2024). Educational

technologies in teaching and learning. O ‘zbekiston davlat jahon tillari universiteti

konferensiyalari, 207-213.