RAQAMLI TEXNOLOGIYALAR DAVRIDA TARJIMASHUNOSLIK VA LINGVISTIKA: ZAMONAVIY YONDASHUVLAR TADQIQI” nomli ilmiy
maqolalar to‘plami May – 2024
182
FORMATION OF NEOLOGISMS AND THEIR
CLASSIFICATION
Yuldosheva Nargiza
Master student of Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages
Abstract —
Neologisms, or newly coined words and expressions, are a fundamental aspect of language evolution. This article
explores the various processes through which neologisms are formed and proposes a comprehensive classification system for
categorizing them. Each of these processes is defined and illustrated with examples. The article also discusses the motivations
behind neologism creation, the role of technology and social media, and the criteria for neologism acceptance and longevity. The
proposed classification system provides a framework for better understanding and researching neologisms from both linguistic and
socio-cultural perspectives.
Annotatsiya —
Neologizmlar yoki yangi kiritilgan so'zlar va iboralar tilevolyutsiyasining asosiy jihati hisoblanadi. Ushbu maqola
neologizmlar shakllanadigan turli jarayonlarni o'rganadi va ularni tasniflash uchun keng qamrovli tasniflash tizimini taklif qiladi.
Ushbu jarayonlarning har biri aniqlangan va misollar bilan tasvirlangan. Maqolada, shuningdek, neologizmni yaratishmotivlari,
texnologiya va ijtimoiy tarmoqlarning roli va neologizmni qabul qilish va uzoq umr ko'rish mezonlari muhokama qilinadi. Taklif
etilayotgan tasniflash tizimi neologizmlarni lingvistik va ijtimoiy-madaniy nuqtai nazardan yaxshiroq tushunish va tadqiq qilish
uchun asos yaratadi
Аннотация —
Неологизмы, или вновь появившиеся слова и выражения, являются фундаментальным аспектом эволюции
языка. В этой статье рассматриваются различные процессы, посредством которых образуются неологизмы, и предлагается
всеобъемлющая система классификации для их отнесения к определенной категории. Каждый из этих процессов
определен и проиллюстрирован примерами. В статье также рассматриваются мотивы создания неологизмов, роль
технологий и социальных сетей, а также критерии приемлемости и долговечности неологизмов. Предлагаемая система
классификации обеспечивает основу для лучшего понимания и исследования неологизмов как с лингвистической, так и с
социокультурной точек зрения
Keywords
— neologisms, word-formation, classification, lexical innovation, language change.
1.
I
NTRODUCTION
Language is a living, dynamic system that constantly evolves to meet the communicative needs of its speakers. One of the most
visible manifestations of this evolution is the emergence of neologisms - new words, expressions, or existing words with new
meanings that enter the lexicon of a language [1]. Neologisms serve various purposes, such as naming new concepts, objects, or
phenomena; expressing ideas more concisely or vividly; or signaling group membership and identity [2]..
2.
M
AIN PART
The study of neologisms is crucial for understanding the mechanisms of language change and the sociocultural factors that drive
lexical innovation. However, the sheer variety and complexity of neologism formation processes pose challenges for their
systematic analysis and classification. Existing taxonomies often focus on specific word-formation mechanisms or domains,
lacking a comprehensive framework that encompasses the full range of neologism types [3].
This article aims to address this gap by proposing a unified classification system for neologisms based on their formation
processes. Through a detailed examination of both well-established and emerging word-formation mechanisms, we seek to provide
a robust framework for analyzing and categorizing neologisms across various linguistic and sociocultural contexts.
Methods and literature review. Data collection.To develop a comprehensive classification of neologism formation processes, we
conducted an extensive literature review spanning various subfields of linguistics, including morphology, lexicology, and
sociolinguistics. We searched academic databases such as Google Scholar, JSTOR, and Linguistic and Language Behavior
Abstracts (LLBA) using keywords such as "neologism," "word-formation," "lexical innovation," and "language change." We also
consulted reference works on English morphology and word-formation, such as Plag [4], Bauer [5], and Lieber [6].
In addition to the literature review, we collected a diverse sample of neologisms from various sources, including dictionaries of
new words (e.g., Merriam-Webster's "Words We're Watching" [7]), online language resources (e.g., Urban Dictionary [8]), and
RAQAMLI TEXNOLOGIYALAR DAVRIDA TARJIMASHUNOSLIK VA LINGVISTIKA: ZAMONAVIY YONDASHUVLAR TADQIQI” nomli ilmiy
maqolalar to‘plami May – 2024
183
social media platforms (e.g., Twitter, Reddit). This sample served to illustrate the different formation processes and validate the
proposed classification system.
Theoretical framework.Our analysis of neologism formation processes is grounded in the framework of morphological theory,
which studies the internal structure of words and the rules governing their formation [9]. We draw on key concepts such as
morphemes (the smallest meaningful units of language), affixation (the addition of prefixes or suffixes to a base), and
compounding (the combination of two or more words to form a new word).
We also consider insights from sociolinguistic approaches to language change, which emphasize the role of social factors, such as
prestige, identity, and technological innovation, in driving lexical innovation [10]. This perspective helps to situate neologisms
within their broader sociocultural context and shed light on the motivations behind their creation and adoption.
Results. Our analysis of the collected neologisms and the reviewed literature reveals 10 primary mechanisms of neologism
formation in English. These processes, along with their definitions and examples, are presented below.
Compounding.Compounding refers to the creation of a new word by combining two or more existing words [11]. The resulting
compound can be written as a single word (closed form), hyphenated, or as separate words (open form). Examples include:
"smartphone" (smart + phone)
"eco-friendly" (eco + friendly)
"fake news" (fake + news)
Derivation.Derivation involves the addition of affixes (prefixes or suffixes) to a base word to create a new word with a related
meaning [12]. Examples include:
"unfriend" (un + friend)
"selfie" (self + ie)
"YouTuber" (YouTube + er)
Blending.Blending is the process of forming a new word by combining parts of two or more existing words, often with overlapping
sounds or meanings [13]. Examples include:
"brunch" (breakfast + lunch)
"smog" (smoke + fog)
"Brexit" (British + exit)
Clipping.Clipping refers to the shortening of an existing word by removing one or more of its syllables [14]. Examples include:
"ad" (advertisement)
"flu" (influenza)
"doc" (doctor)
Acronyms and initialisms.Acronyms and initialisms are formed by combining the initial letters of a phrase or series of words.
Acronyms are pronounced as words (e.g., NATO), while initialisms are pronounced letter by letter (e.g., FBI) [15]. Examples
include:
"NASA" (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
"FOMO" (Fear of Missing Out)
"DIY" (Do It Yourself)
Conversion.Conversion, also known as zero derivation or functional shift, is the process of creating a new word by changing the
grammatical function of an existing word without altering its form [16]. Examples include:
"google" (verb, from the proper noun Google)
"adult" (verb, from the noun adult)
"bookmark" (verb, from the noun bookmark)
Eponyms.Eponyms are words derived from the names of people, places, or fictional characters [17]. Examples include:
"sandwich" (from the Earl of Sandwich)
"boycott" (from Charles Boycott)
"Orwellian" (from George Orwell)
Loanwords.Loanwords are words borrowed from other languages and incorporated into the lexicon of the recipient language [18].
Examples include:
"schadenfreude" (from German)
"emoji" (fromJapanese)
"déjà vu" (from French)
Onomatopoeia.Onomatopoeia refers to the formation of words that imitate the sounds associated with the objects or actions they
refer to [19]. Examples include:
"buzz"
"sizzle"
"hiss"
RAQAMLI TEXNOLOGIYALAR DAVRIDA TARJIMASHUNOSLIK VA LINGVISTIKA: ZAMONAVIY YONDASHUVLAR TADQIQI” nomli ilmiy
maqolalar to‘plami May – 2024
184
Reduplication.Reduplication is the repetition of all or part of a word to create a new word, often with a modified or intensified
meaning [20]. Examples include:
"chit-chat"
"hush-hush"
"wishy-washy"
Analysis. The proposed classification system reveals several patterns and trends in the formation of neologisms in English.
Compounding and derivation emerge as the most productive mechanisms, accounting for a significant portion of the neologisms in
our sample. This finding aligns with previous studies that have identified these processes as central to English word-formation
[21].
Blending and clipping also prove to be significant sources of neologisms, particularly in informal and digital communication
contexts. The popularity of these processes can be attributed to their ability to compress information and create catchy, memorable
forms that are well-suited to the fast-paced, attention-driven nature of modern media [22].
Acronyms, initialisms, and loanwords reflect the growing influence of specialized domains, such as science, technology, and
international culture, on the English lexicon. As these fields continue to generate new concepts and terminologies, they serve as
important catalysts for neologism formation [23].
Conversion, eponyms, onomatopoeia, and reduplication, while less frequent in our sample, nonetheless represent significant
mechanisms of lexical innovation. These processes often involve a degree of linguistic creativity and playfulness, highlighting the
role of individual agency and stylistic choice in neologism formation [24].
Discussion. The classification system proposed in this article offers a comprehensive framework for analyzing and categorizing
neologisms based on their formation processes. By encompassing a wide range of word-formation mechanisms, it provides a more
holistic view of lexical innovation than previous taxonomies that have focused on specific processes or domains.
However, it is important to acknowledge that neologism formation is a complex and multifaceted phenomenon that cannot be fully
captured by any single classification system. Some neologisms may involve multiple formation processes or defy straightforward
categorization [25]. Moreover, the boundaries between different categories can sometimes be blurry, as in the case of blends that
resemble compounds or clippings that overlap with acronyms.
Another key consideration is the role of social, cultural, and technological factors in shaping neologism formation and diffusion.
The digital age has ushered in new modes of communication and language use that have accelerated the pace of lexical innovation
and broadened the avenues for neologism spread [26]. Social media platforms, online communities, and viral trends have become
powerful engines of neologism creation and popularization, often bypassing traditional gatekeepers such as dictionaries and
language authorities [27].
This changing landscape calls for a more dynamic and contextually grounded approach to the study of neologisms, one that takes
into account the complex interplay between linguistic structures, communicative practices, and sociocultural forces. Future
research could explore how different formation processes are employed across various genres, registers, and communities of
practice, as well as how neologisms evolve and spread in digital environments [28].
Furthermore, the cross-linguistic applicability of the proposed classification system merits investigation. While this article focuses
on English neologisms, it would be valuable to examine how well the identified formation processes map onto other languages
with different morphological and sociolinguistic profiles. Such comparative analyses could shed light on universal tendencies and
language-specific patterns in neologism formation [29].
3.
C
ONCLUSION
Neologisms are a vital aspect of language change and a reflection of the dynamic nature of human communication. By proposing a
comprehensive classification system based on formation processes, this article contributes to a more systematic understanding of
the mechanisms underlying lexical innovation in English.
The 10 categories identified - compounding, derivation, blending, clipping, acronyms and initialisms, conversion, eponyms,
loanwords, onomatopoeia, and reduplication - capture the diverse ways in which new words are coined and integrated into the
language. While some processes, such as compounding and derivation, emerge as more dominant, each category represents a
significant avenue for linguistic creativity and adaptation.
However, the study of neologisms extends beyond the mere classification of formation processes. It requires a holistic approach
that considers the complex interplay between linguistic structures, social practices, and cultural dynamics. As digital technologies
continue to reshape the landscape of communication, it becomes increasingly important to investigate how these forces influence
the creation, spread, and evolution of neologisms.
4.
R
EFERENCES
[1]
Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. New York: Prentice Hall.
[2]
Algeo, J. (1993). Fifty years among the new words: A dictionary of neologisms. Cambridge University Press.
RAQAMLI TEXNOLOGIYALAR DAVRIDA TARJIMASHUNOSLIK VA LINGVISTIKA: ZAMONAVIY YONDASHUVLAR TADQIQI” nomli ilmiy
maqolalar to‘plami May – 2024
185
[3]
Fischer, R. (1998). Lexical change in present-day English: A corpus-based study of the motivation, institutionalization, and
productivity of creative neologisms. Gunter NarrVerlag.
[4]
Plag, I. (2003). Word-formation in English. Cambridge University Press.
[5]
Bauer, L. (2001). Morphological productivity. Cambridge University Press.
[6]
Lieber, R. (2004). Morphology and lexical semantics. Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Words We're Watching. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/new-
words-in-the-dictionary
[8]
Urban Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.urbandictionary.com/
[9]
Aronoff, M., &Fudeman, K. (2011). What is morphology? (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
[10]
Coupland, N. (2014). Sociolinguistic change, vernacularization and broadcast British media. Mediatization and sociolinguistic
change, 67-96.
[11]
Fabb, N. (1998). Compounding. In A. Spencer & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), The handbook of morphology (pp. 66-83). Blackwell.
[12]
Bauer, L. (2004). A glossary of morphology. Georgetown University Press.
[13]
Gries, S. T. (2004). Shouldn't it be breakfunch? A quantitative analysis of blend structure in English. Linguistics, 42(3), 639-
667.
[14]
Jamet, D. (2009). A morphophonological approach to clipping in English. Can the study of clipping be formalized? Lexis:
Journal in English Lexicology, (HS 1).
[15]
Cannon, G. (1989). Abbreviations and acronyms in English word-formation. American Speech, 64(2), 99-127.
[16]
Balteiro, I. (2007). The directionality of conversion in English: A dia-synchronic study. Peter Lang.
[17]
Room, A. (1996). An alphabetical guide to the language of name studies. Scarecrow Press.
[18]
Haspelmath, M. (2009). Lexical borrowing: Concepts and issues. Loanwords in the world's languages: A comparative
handbook, 35-54.
[19]
Anderson, E. R. (1998). A grammar of iconism. Associated University Presses.
[20]
Inkelas, S., &Zoll, C. (2005). Reduplication: Doubling in morphology. Cambridge University Press.
[21]
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2013). The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford University Press.
[22]
Lehrer, A. (2007). Blendalicious. In J. Munat (Ed.), Lexical creativity, texts and contexts (pp. 115-133). John Benjamins.
[23]
Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (6th ed.). Blackwell.
[24]
Hohenhaus, P. (2007). How to do (even more) things with nonce words. In J. Munat (Ed.), Lexical creativity, texts and
contexts (pp. 15-38). John Benjamins.
[25]
Warren, B. (1990). The importance of combining forms. In W. U. Dressler, H. C. Luschützky, O. E. Pfeiffer, & J. R. Rennison
(Eds.), Contemporary morphology (pp. 111-132). Mouton de Gruyter.
[26]
Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.
[27]
Kerremans, D. (2015). A web of new words: A corpus-based study of the conventionalization process of English neologisms.
Peter Lang.
[28]
Schmid, H. J. (2008). New words in the mind: Concept-formation and entrenchment of neologisms. Anglia, 126(1), 1-36.
[29]
Matiasek, J. (2016). Neologism: A morphological or sociolinguistic notion? In A. Hippisley& V. Lazaridou-Hitzigogara
(Eds.), The cognitive perspective on the lexicon within the framework of generative grammar (pp. 129-174). Peter Lang.
