МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:
ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА
Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024
SJIF 2024 = 5.444
Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март
207
https://universalpublishings.com
REGIONAL DIALECTOLOGY
Eshqorayeva Ibodat Choriyevna
Termez state pedagogical institute
Abstract:
Regional dialectology is the study of language variation across
different geographical areas, focusing on differences in pronunciation, vocabulary,
grammar, and syntax. This field investigates how linguistic features develop within
specific regions due to historical, social, and cultural influences. By employing
methods such as dialect surveys, linguistic mapping, and sociolinguistic interviews,
researchers identify patterns of regional speech and establish isoglosses—boundaries
marking linguistic differences. Regional dialects not only reflect local identity but also
evolve due to migration, globalization, and media influence. This study highlights the
significance of dialectal diversity and its role in understanding linguistic change over
time.
Key words:
Dialectology, Dialect, Geographic distribution, Historical
linguistics, Sociolinguistics, Phonological features, Lexical features, Mutual
intelligibility, Diglossia, Pluricentrism, Isoglosses, Urban vs. rural speech
Introduction
Dialectology
, derived from the Greek words
διάλεκτος
(dialektos, meaning
"talk" or "dialect") and
-λογία
(-logia, meaning "study" or "science"), is the systematic
study of dialects, which are subsets of languages. Initially regarded as a branch of
historical linguistics in the 19th century, it is now often considered a subfield of
sociolinguistics. The primary focus of dialectology is on linguistic variations that arise
due to geographical distribution and the features associated with them. It explores
МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:
ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА
Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024
SJIF 2024 = 5.444
Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март
208
https://universalpublishings.com
aspects such as how two local dialects evolve from a common linguistic ancestor and
studies both historical (diachronic) and contemporary (synchronic) changes in
language.
Dialectologists examine grammatical, lexical, and phonological traits that
correspond to specific regions. They analyze not only long-established communities
but also migrant groups that introduce their languages into new linguistic
environments, leading to language contact and change.
Some key topics in dialectology include
mutual intelligibility
, which concerns
how well speakers of different dialects understand each other;
diglossia
, where two
dialects serve distinct social functions;
dialect continua
, which involve a series of
dialects with varying degrees of intelligibility; and
pluricentrism
, where a language
has multiple standard varieties.
Early dialectology focused on producing
dialect maps
, marking linguistic
boundaries (isoglosses) between dialect regions. However, the field later expanded to
include social factors in linguistic variation. For example, the
Linguistic Atlas of the
United States
, created in the 1930s, was one of the first studies to incorporate social
aspects into dialect research.
Methods of data collection
Various techniques are used to gather information on regional dialects and select
suitable participants for research. Initially, dialectologists sought out older speakers in
rural areas to document the most traditional and least altered forms of dialects.
However, with the rise of sociolinguistics, researchers have shifted their focus to
younger urban speakers to study ongoing linguistic changes and innovations.
Early dialect studies often relied on
written questionnaires
, where informants
self-reported dialectal features. This approach has regained popularity in recent years
МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:
ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА
Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024
SJIF 2024 = 5.444
Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март
209
https://universalpublishings.com
due to the ease of collecting data through online surveys, which allow researchers to
reach a vast number of respondents at a low cost.
In the 20th century,
face-to-face interviews
became the dominant method for
dialect research, using two main types of questionnaires:
•
Direct questionnaires
, which require specific responses to gather lexical
and phonological data (e.g., asking participants to name objects or pronounce words).
•
Indirect questionnaires
, which collect information in a more open-ended
way.
Mutual intelligibility
One common method for distinguishing between languages and dialects is
mutual intelligibility—whether speakers of two linguistic varieties can understand each
other. However, this criterion is not always reliable. For example, Spanish and Italian
share similarities and are somewhat understandable to speakers of each language, but
their differences in phonology, syntax, morphology, and vocabulary prevent them from
being classified as dialects of the same language. Instead, both evolved separately from
Latin, their common ancestral language.
REFERENCES
1.
"The Gaelic Story at the University of Glasgow". Archived from the
original on 24 November 2021. Retrieved 11 August 2019.
2.
^ Dollinger, Stefan. 2015. The Written Questionnaire in Social
Dialectology. Amsterdam: Benjamins, chapter 1.
3.
^ Chambers, J.K., and Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology. 2nd ed.
Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
4.
^ Jump up to:a b Susanne Wagner (2004-07-22). "Gender in English
reality" (PDF). Albert-Ludwigs-Universität
Freiburg. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-11-27. Retrieved 2020-11-03.
МЕДИЦИНА, ПЕДАГОГИКА И ТЕХНОЛОГИЯ:
ТЕОРИЯ И ПРАКТИКА
Researchbib Impact factor: 13.14/2024
SJIF 2024 = 5.444
Том 3, Выпуск 03, Март
210
https://universalpublishings.com
5.
^ Ferguson, Charles A. (1959-01-01). "Diglossia". WORD. 15 (2): 325–
340. doi:10.1080/00437956.1959.11659702. ISSN 0043-7956. S2CID 239352211.
6.
^ Chambers, J.K.; Trudgill, Peter (1998). Dialectology (2nd ed.).
Cambridge University Press. p. 6. ISBN 978-0-521-59646-6.
7.
^ Clyne, Michael G. (1992). Pluricentric languages : differing norms in
different
nations.
Clyne,
Michael
G.,
1939-2010.
8.
Goebl, H., ed. (1984). Dialectology. Quantitative Linguistics, Vol. 21.
Bochum: Brockmeyer. ISBN 3-88339-346-0.
9.
Petyt, K. M. (1980). The Study of Dialect: An Introduction to
Dialectology. The language library. London: A. Deutsch.
10.
Stankiewicz, Edward (1957), "On discreteness and continuity in structural
dialectology", Word, 13 (1): 44–59, doi:10.1080/00437956.1957.11659627
11.
Thomas,
Alan
R.
(1967),
"Generative
phonology
in
dialectology", Transactions
of
the
Philological
Society, 66 (1): 179–
203, doi:10.1111/j.1467-968X.1967.tb00343.x
12.
Kabilova
Sayyora
Abdukarimovna.
(2023).
THEORETICAL
FOUNDATIONS OF THE STUDY EUPHEMISMS. Proceedings of International
Conference on Modern Science and Scientific Studies, 2(6), 119–123. Retrieved from
https://econferenceseries.com/index.php/icmsss/article/view/2256
13.
More Citation Formats
14.
Sayyora, Kabilova. "Metaphor in Newspapers." JournalNX, vol. 7, no. 1,
2021, pp. 210-214.
15.
Stylistic Forms Of Euphemisms. (2024). Pedagogical Cluster-Journal of
Pedagogical
Developments, 2(5),
215-
220. https://euroasianjournals.org/index.php/pc/article/view/378
