Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Journal home page:
https://inscience.uz/index.php/socinov/index
The importance of communication in learning lexical units
Aziza NAJMIDDINOVA
Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages
ARTICLE INFO
ABSTRACT
Article history:
Received December 2023
Received in revised form
15 December 2023
Accepted 20 January 2024
Available online
15 February 2024
This article discusses the importance of communication in
the study of vocabulary items and the process by which new
vocabulary items can formed. In addition, information about
their types is given.
2181-
1415/©
2024 in Science LLC.
https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol5-iss1/S-pp48-53
This is an open access article under the Attribution 4.0 International
(CC BY 4.0) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ru)
Keywords:
lexical units,
language,
teach,
social,
learn,
methods,
environment,
process,
negative influence,
sounds,
transposition,
knowledge,
skills,
competence,
communication.
Луғавий бирликларни ўрганишда мулоқотнинг аҳамияти
АННОТАЦИЯ
Калит сўзлар:
лексик бирликлар,
тил,
ўргатиш,
ижтимоий ўрганиш,
усуллар,
муҳит,
жараён,
салбий таъсир,
товушлар,
транспозиция,
билим,
кўникма,
малака,
алоқа.
Ушбу мақолада луғавий бирликларни ўрганишда
мулоқотнинг аҳамияти ва янги ҳосил бўлиши мумкин
бўлган луғавий бирликлар жараёни ҳақида фикрлар баён
этилган. Бундан ташқари уларнинг турлари ҳақида
маълумотлар келтириб ўтилган.
1
Independent researcher (PhD), Samarkand State Institute of Foreign Languages.
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
01 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
49
Важность общения в изучении лексических единиц
АННОТАЦИЯ
Ключевые слова:
Лексические единицы,
язык,
обучение,
социальное обучение,
методы,
окружающая среда,
процесс,
негативное влияние,
звуки,
транспозиция,
знания,
навыки,
компетентность,
общение.
В данной статье обсуждается важность общения при
изучении словарных единиц и процесс формирования
новых словарных единиц. Также представлена информация
о их видах.
INTRODUCTION
In the world of linguistics, the problem of continuous innovation processes in the
language system has never lost its relevance. Especially in the last decades of the 20th
century and the first decades of the 21st century, there were sharp changes, radical
changes, and unprecedented updates in various aspects of social life. Extra linguistic
factors such as the reunification of Germany, the establishment of the European Union,
and the rapid development of information and communication technologies. The
processes of globalization and integration have led to the acceleration of innovative
processes in the vocabulary of the English language, the enrichment of the language
through lexical units, because of which their special study has become a more urgent
issue.
Currently, in world linguistics, research is being conducted in the directions of
researching lexical units, which are considered the main source of language development,
in semantic-derivative, integrative, lingua-cultural, semantic-communicative, lingua-
cognitive, functional-pragmatic, psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic aspects.
Studies are being carried out on issues such as the role of everyday colloquial
speech in the current English language system. The specific features of the development
of its vocabulary, the creation of new lexical units through non-standard methods, and
their variability, some unclear situations and aspects need to be studied regarding the
research of lexical units within the framework of colloquial speech. Expressiveness,
emotionality, imagery, evaluation, etc., are important problems because their solution
provides an opportunity for a deeper study of the fundamental issues of the new lexical
meaning. Also, while explaining the essence of new lexical units, the specificity of their
semantics and the mechanisms of their creation, the process of the emergence of lexical
units, and the research methods of lexical and phraseological materials of different styles,
it creates a basis for the comprehensive study of the new lexicon in texts and dictionaries.
The relevance of this issue is determined by studying the pragmatic factors of
speech activity.
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
01 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
50
REFERENCES OF USE AND METHODS
In world linguistics, innovative processes in the language system are widely
studied based on the materials of different languages. During the past period,
M.D. Stepanova,
V.D. Devkin,
E.V. Rosen,
M.I. Umarkhodzhaev,
B.T. Ganeev,
I. Ibrahimkhodzhaev, S.I. Alatortseva, S.I. Toshalieva, W. Fleischer, P. Brown, R. Baayen,
B.Gardin and others were involved.
An approach aimed at in-depth study of the development processes in any state of
the language is a characteristic of modern linguistics. It is also necessary to describe
typical forms of language dynamism, including innovation from a differential perspective.
In 1954, A. Maye paid attention to this issue, presenting his ideas about general and
specific innovations. Although classics of theoretical linguistics such as H. Paul, F. de
Saussure, S. Bally, and L. Bloomfield have paid attention to this problem from different
angles, the place of innovation in the language system has not been studied in depth.
Moreover, the systematic status of the innovation was not specifically studied, it
was limited to the research of the existing theoretical state of the language, namely the
norms of language change, synchrony, and diachronic. Lexical units that appeared in the
German everyday language in the last decade of the 20th century and the first decade of
the 21st century was taken as research materials. The stylistic sign of a new lexical unit
recorded in the system of lexical signs is a criterion indicating that these words belong to
the colloquial lexicon. Since most of the studied lexemes have a stylistic sign, it is
appropriate to express the colorful new words and phrases specific to the colloquial
language with the term colloquial lexical unit.
A differential approach to this universal language phenomenon is entirely appropriate
in connection with the wide range of problems involved in learning new lexis.
Now, issues such as the description of lexical units in several functional styles of
the language have already attracted the attention of linguists, and research in this regard
continues, but the issue of "renaming" concepts that have taken a firm place in the lexical
system is not sufficiently cover in linguistic sources. Lexical innovations are studied in
depth in studies devoted to functional-stylistic analysis of new lexical material.
In addition, it is necessary to identify productive word formation methods that enrich the
colloquial lexicon with new lexical units, as well as to study some types of semantic
processes that lead to the formation of new colloquial meanings.
New lexical units are an important source of enrichment of English vocabulary.
Their scope is extremely wide and includes from stylistically neutral, general literary
units to slang vulgarisms. Lack of in-depth study of lexical and phraseological stylistics,
the border of different functional styles, as well as the frequent changes in the norms of
word usage, create serious difficulties in determining the stylistic status of lexical units.
Moreover, the new lexical system cannot be called stable, because it cannot keep pace
with the language system, and therefore needs constant semantic-stylistic correction.
Even though considerable work has been done on the study of continuous
innovation processes in the language system. The role and systemic status of innovation
in the language system have not been thoroughly studied, lexical innovations have not
been analyzed based on the external relation and internal-structural aspects of the
activation of the complex dynamic system of the current English language. Lexical units
are semantically and pragmatically within the framework of spoken speech. Not studied
in a monographic way. It is desirable to carry out the research of innovation because of
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
01 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
51
specific language material within the framework of a particular acquired language level.
Speech activity, first, consists of the methods of speech information transfer, which are
associated with the importance of distinguishing features such as the interaction of
information, processing, semiotics, logic, and emotionality. In the process of speech,
information transfer is carried out by preparing the text and processing it. In this
process, large-scale changes are observed in the understanding of the received
information, but the mutual compatibility of the transmitted and received material is
partly due to the interest, that is, the addressee's readiness to absorb information of the
relevant content.
DISCUSSION
The pragmatic features of the new lexicon are unique. Focusing on information
about the use of new words in texts belonging to a certain genre or author makes it
possible to obtain objective results that contribute to the development of a general
theory of language. To obtain such information, a complete knowledge of the new words
being studied is necessary. First, it is necessary to take into account the exemplary,
ontological features of new words. At this point, it is appropriate to cite the following
thesis of G.V. Kolshansky, the unity of form and content, which is the basis of
communicative linguistics, the monistic vision of the integrity of the communicative
function of language. The recognition of the multifaceted nature of the qualities and
characteristics of the language within the framework of the single communicative-
content function, in the future not only from a general theoretical but also from a
practical point of view, can lead to certain positive results in the study of different levels
and units of concrete languages. The situational factor is important in the emergence of
colloquial speech, this factor allows the study of speech options, and the theory of
modern speech activity covers a wide range of the science of language and the emergence
of words, the essence of information in the emergence of words. The transmission of
information in the process of speech communication, its reception changes related to
making, functional and pragmatic features of the new lexicon are important in the
emergence of colloquial speech and the emergence of new lexical units. Evaluation is the
basis of speech activity and is one of the main means of creating emotionality. The
content of the assessment is both intellectual and intellectually motivated. Imagery and
intensity are important aspects of expressiveness. All structural-semantic innovations
are divided into evaluative and non-evaluative innovations. Semantic and pragmatic
types are distinguished according to the principle of connection with linguistic and extra-
linguistic factors. Each type of communication requires a specific situation. Written mass
communication is characterized by a communication situation in which the participants
of the dialogue perform through a specific speech object. As a result, this type of
communication takes the form of indirect communication, which is further complicated
by the distance of the participants in terms of space and time and the presence of an
intermediary person. The mediator plays an important role in the communicative act of
written mass communication. For example, in written advertisements that are constantly
used in everyday life, a copywriting bureau is an intermediary. The intermediary receives
the relevant content information from the advertiser.
RESULTS
The following features distinguish the external-attitude aspect of the complex
dynamic system of the language:
1) A specific attitude to the changing external environment;
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
01 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
52
2) Speech realization;
3) Use in accordance with the customs and norms of the community;
4) Synchrony and dynamic interdependence.
The stable connection and relationship between language and the external
environment is characteristic of the first characteristic. The third feature of the external-
relational aspect of the complex dynamic system of the language is combine with the
second, that is, the use of the complex dynamic system of the language in the process of
speech communication in accordance with the customs and norms of the community. The
internal-structural aspect of the complex dynamic system of the language covers the
concept of language as a construction system special attention is paid to the analysis of
system elements and construction models of system elements and a system of relations
special attention is paid to the study of connections of system elements. The following
features characterize this aspect:
1) Integrity of the language system and the fact that language construction is not
completely dependent on some changes in material existence;
2) Differences between language system elements and their actual signs;
3) Interaction and influence of language elements at the same level;
4) Development of inter-level communication and relations;
5) Structural changes of construction models of language elements. It is distinguished
by taking into account the communication process from all sides, paying attention to speech
creativity, the language and style of the "speech work", and the interaction between
individuals in the exchange of information through the medium of language. At the same
time, also consistency envisages scientific research related to the generalization of the new
lexicon and the study of new meaning features in the communicative act, which is one of the
important areas in the aspects of general language practice.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, communication is a social activity and belongs to the system of types
of purposeful human activity. Therefore, it is a social phenomenon in terms of its
occurrence, nature, and development laws. The purpose of communication is social
communication, which tends to influence society. In this way, the characteristic of human
communication is determined. Relative completeness of thought in terms of content and
grammar, in general, is the basis of any conscious communication. The main condition for
the use of any language unit is its completeness in terms of form and content. This
completeness is ensured by the legal connections of independent and auxiliary words.
The first unit of language studied in the communicative aspect is the thought, which is the
reason for its recognition as the initial category of any linguistic analysis. As at the formal
level, so at the semantic level the interrelationship of all thought-forming units, first, the
semantic relations existing in the thought, as well as individual units for example, words
and combinations phraseological unit, word combination and a syntactic construction,
primary and secondary requires the study of interrelationships in fragments. The
interrelationship of language units is precisely the context that occurs simultaneously
with the process of formation of each word, construction and thought. The use of any
language unit requires the description of its immediate environment. In particular, it is
required to analyze the complete thought as the smallest communicative link and device
at the layer of the phrase.
Жамият
ва
инновациялар
–
Общество
и
инновации
–
Society and innovations
Special Issue
–
01 (2024) / ISSN 2181-1415
53
REFERENCES:
1.
Ўзбекистон
Республикаси
Президентининг
“Ўзбекистон
Республикасини
янада
ривожлантириш
бўйича
Ҳаракатлар
стратегияси
тўғрисида”ги
Фармони
. //
Халқ
сўзи
, 2017
йил
8
февраль
.
–№ 28.
2.
Ахмедов Анвар. Тил луғат таркибининг янгиланиш жараёнлари лингвистик
муаммо сифатида. Монография. Қарши. “Intellekt” нашриёти, 2022. –
140 б.
3.
Бушуй А.М. Историческое развитие языка как объект общей лингвистики
// Вестник Каракалпакского Отделения Академии наук Республики Узбекистан. –
Нукус, 2004. –
№ 5
-6.
–
С.157
-158.
4.
Болотнова Н.С. Основы теории текста: Пособие для учителей и студентов
филологов педагогического университета. –
Томск: Изд
-
во Том. гос. пед. ун
-
та,
1999.
–
С.15
-
18; Бушуй А.М. Язык и действительность. –Ташкент: Фан, 2005. –
С.41
5.
Мейе А. Сравнительный метод в историческом языкознании. –
М.: Изд
-
во
иностр. лит
-
ры, 1954. –
С.82
-83.
6.
Степанова М.Д. Словосложение в современном немецком языке: Автореф.
дисс. … докт. филол. наук. –
Л.: ЛГУ, 1960. –
48 c.
7.
Девкин В.Д Немецкая разговорная речь: Синтаксис и лексика / В.Д. Девкин.
–
М.: Международные отношения, 1979. –
256 с.
8.
Розен Е.В. На пороге XXI века. Новые слова и словосочетания в немецком
языке. –
М.: Просвещение, 2000. –
252 с.
9.
Умарходжаев М.И. Центр и периферия во фразеологии // Известия АН.
Серия литературы и языка. –
М., 1980, Т.39, –
вып. 2. –
С.147
-152.
10.
Ганеев Б.Т. Ортофрония и аллофрония в языке и речи // Филологические
науки. –
М., 2004. –
№3. –
С.57
- 67.
11.
Ибрагимходжаев И. Сложение как способ образования новых и
окказиональных слов в современном английском языке. Автореф. дисс. канд.
филол. наук. –
М.: МГПИИЯ, 1979. –
26 c.
12.
Алаторцева С.И. Проблемы неологии и русская неография: Автореф.
дисс.докт. филол. наук. СПб., 1999. –
40 с.
13.
Тошалиева С.И. Ўзбек тилида окказионал сўз ясалиши. Филол. фан. номз.
дис. автореф. –
Тошкент, 1998. –
25 б.
14.Fleischer W. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache.
–
Leipzig:
Enzyklopädie, 2001. –
378 S.
15.
Braun P. Tendenzen in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Sprachvarietäten. –
Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2008a.
–
564 S.
16.Baayen R.H. Chronicling the Times: Productive Lexical Innovations in an English
Newspaper / R.H. Baayen // Language 72. 1996.
–
p.69-96.
17.Gardin B. La neologie. Aspects sociolonguistiques / B. Gardin // In: Guilbert L.
La neologie lexicale. Paris: Larousse, 1974.
–
P.67-73.
