Authors

  • Shokhistakhon Sodikova
    Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.ijai.120137

Abstract

In medical discourse, euphemisms have emotional and psychological significance along with linguistic features. Euphemisms used in medical discourse carry not only linguistic but also emotional and psychological weight. Therefore, they help reduce fear, anxiety, and stigma associated with illnesses such as cancer, mental disorders, and terminal conditions.. Euphemisms play a significant role in social interaction. In the current globalized context, their role in medical discourse is increasingly important. This research shows that how euphemistic language emerges and the different ways of euphemization in medical field.

 

 

background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1372

THE FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO THE EMERGENCE OF ILLNESS-RELATED

EUPHEMISMS IN MEDICAL DISCOURSE

Sodikova Shokhistakhon Bakhodir qizi

Phd researcher at the Higher School of International

Journalism and Translation Studies, Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies

shokhista94@mail.ru

Abstract:

In medical discourse, euphemisms have emotional and psychological significance

along with linguistic features. Euphemisms used in medical discourse carry not only linguistic

but also emotional and psychological weight. Therefore, they help reduce fear, anxiety, and

stigma associated with illnesses such as cancer, mental disorders, and terminal conditions..

Euphemisms play a significant role in social interaction. In the current globalized context, their

role in medical discourse is increasingly important. This research shows that how euphemistic

language emerges and the different ways of euphemization in medical field.

Keywords:

Medical euphemisms, illness conceptualization, doctor-patient communication,

sociolinguistic factors, pragmatic language use, health discourse, linguistic mitigation, cultural

factors.

Annotatsiya.

Tibbiy muloqotda evfemizmlar nafaqat tilshunoslik nuqtayi nazardan, balki emotsional va

psixologik jihatdan ham muhim ahamiyatga egadir. Tibbiy muloqotda ishlatiladigan

evfemizmlar og‘ir tashxis va holatlarni yumshoq shaklda yetkazish orqali bemorga nisbatan

psixologik bosimini kamaytiradi, muloqotni yanada samimiy va tushunarli qiladi. Ular saraton,

ruhiy kasalliklar va o‘lim bilan yakunlanuvchi xastaliklar kabi holatlarga oid qo‘rquv, tashvish

va ijtimoiy tamg`a darajasini kamaytirishga xizmat qiladi Ayniqsa sog‘liqni saqlash sohasida

evfemizmlar bemorning ruhiy holatini barqarorlashtiradi, ortiqcha stressdan himoya qiladi

hamda shifokor va bemor o‘rtasidagi muloqotni yaxshilaydi. Hozirgi globallashuv sharoitida

ularning tibbiy muloqotdagi o‘rni yanada ortib bormoqda. Ushbu tadqiqot tibbiyot sohasida

evfemistik til birliklarining qanday yuzaga kelishini va evfemizatsiyaning turli shakllarini ochib

beradi.

Kalit so‘zlar

: Tibbiy evfemizmlar, kasallikni konseptual ifodalash, shifokor va bemor muloqoti,

sotsiolingvistik omillar, pragmalingvistik til vostalaridan foydalanish, sog‘liqni saqlash

muloqoti, til vositasida yumshatish, madaniy omillar.

Аннотация.

В медицинском дискурсе эвфемизмы обладают не только лингвистическими, но и

эмоционально-психологическими характеристиками. Они способствуют снижению

страха, тревоги и социальной стигматизации, связанных с такими заболеваниями, как рак,

психические расстройства и смертельные болезни. Использование эвфемизмов в

медицине позволяет смягчить жесткую реальность болезни, облегчая эмоциональное

состояние пациента и улучшая качество общения между врачом и пациентом. Особенно


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1373

в

здравоохранении

эвфемистический

язык

способствует

стабилизации

психоэмоционального фона пациента, снижению стресса и обеспечению этичного

взаимодействия. В разных культурах эвфемизмы помогают сохранять социальную

гармонию, отражая общественные установки по отношению к здоровью и болезням.

Ключевые слова:

Медицинские эвфемизмы, концептуализация болезни, общение врача

и пациента, социолингвистические факторы, прагматическое использование языка,

медицинский дискурс, лингвистическая смягчаемость, культурные факторы.

Introduction.

The use of euphemisms in the medical field—particularly in communication between doctors

and patients—is vitally important in today’s modern world. The emergence of various diseases,

their mutations, and their rapid global spread (such as: pandemics) have created the necessity

for physicians to develop both medical knowledge and communicative competence. At the

same time, euphemisms used in medical discourse not only enhance medical culture and

professional interaction but also play a crucial role in maintaining the patient’s psychological

well-being. Moreover, the use of euphemistic expressions in communication is not merely

about concealing the truth, but rather about conveying the patient’s condition in a manner that

considers their emotional, cultural, and psychological state, as well as that of their relatives.

Concepts like disease, death, disability, suffering, and dangerous diagnoses frequently cause

intense emotional reactions in the human brain, according to psycholinguistic research. Doctors,

medical personnel, and other healthcare workers are often required to communicate these

circumstances with extreme strategies. For example, statements like "a serious illness" may be

used in place of "cancer," while "passing away" or "limited treatment options" may be favored

over "death." These linguistic decisions help to improve social sensitivity, empathy, and respect

for the patient and their family members.

Methods.

The usage of euphemisms in medical discourse in Uzbek and English was investigated in this

study using a qualitative and comparative research methods. With special attention to their

function in doctor-patient communication, cultural sensitivity, and professional ethics, the study

concentrated on recognizing, categorizing, and evaluating medical euphemisms from a

theoretical, semantic, and pragmatic viewpoint. The study's primary data came from a range of

reliable sources, including:

Medical dialogues, doctor-patient consultations, and health-related interviews (in both

English and Uzbek);

Medical websites, brochures, and public health campaigns;

resources in print and digital media that dealt with health issues;

Hugh Rawson's A Dictionary of Euphemisms and Other Doubletalk.

The study analyzed that in medical sphere euphemisms are mostly used for the following

functions:

To defend the patient`s psychological well-being; for ex: Big C or unknown growth

(noma`lum o`simta) is instead of “Cancer”(saraton) .


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1374

Social sensitiveness: “differently abled” instead of “disabled” or “mentally challenged”

can soften the word “insane”.

"Alignment with ethical principles: “passed away” instead of “died” “he is at the end of

his life” refers to “terminal illness” meaning that the patient is going to die.

It is clear that, from the examples provided, every specific function of euphemisms is vital to

maintain psychological well-being of the person.

Results.

The analysis combined the following techniques in a descriptive and analytical manner:

Linguistic classification

according to semantic domains (e.g., mental health, addiction,

disability, terminal illness);

Contextual interpretation

, which makes use of discourse analysis to comprehend the

pragmatic purposes of euphemisms (such as mitigation, face-saving, and courtesy);

Cross-cultural comparison

, showing how Uzbek and English medical communication

use euphemisms differently and similarly;


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1375

According to this study, euphemisms in medical discourse are more than just stylistic or

linguistic devices; they are crucial instruments for morally sound and culturally relevant

communication in healthcare environments. In delicate situations like giving diagnoses, talking

about fatal illnesses, or dealing with stigmatized issues including mental illnesses, impairments,

and substance addiction, their utilization is especially important. From a sociolinguistic and

practical perspective, euphemisms help patients feel less psychologically burdened by enabling

more cordial and courteous communication between patients and medical staff. Additionally,

they help to ensure that information is communicated in a manner consistent with professional

standards of medical communication, ethical norms, and cultural values.

Discussion.

The works of Keith Allan and Kate Burridge have laid the foundation for modern euphemism

studies. In the book “Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon”

they emphasize the protective role of euphemisms in medicine and how they lessen distress (pp.


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1376

45–47). Steven Pinker (2007): Pinker addresses euphemistic language in medical settings and

how it can affect patients' perceptions in The Stuff of Thought (pp. 218-222). In her book

“Putting a Name to It” (2006), Annemarie Jutel discusses medical euphemisms, highlighting

how euphemistic language not only reduces stigma but also conveys essential medical truths.

Judy Z. Segal, in her work “Health and the Rhetoric of Medicine” (2000), explores how

euphemisms influence narratives about health and doctor-patient communication. Michael

Hyde, in “Dying Virtues” (2001), discusses the dual role of euphemisms at the end of life —

providing emotional relief while also conveying important truths, even though this may delay

decision-making processes. In “Scientific Characters” (2013), Lisa Keränen demonstrates the

powerful impact of euphemisms in cancer discourse, showing how they shape patients’ and

their families’ understanding of illness and treatment.
The use of euphemism in medical language is not a matter of optional choice but emerges as a

necessity. It serves as a tool for expressing sensitivity toward the patient while maintaining

professional distance. In global linguistics, alongside the aforementioned scholars, several other

prominent researchers in the fields of medicine and linguistics have contributed significantly

through their works. Dr. Brian Goldman, in “The Secret Language of Doctors”; Fergus

Shanahan, in “The Language of Illness”; Rees Charlotte Knight and Lynn, “Thinking 'No' but

Saying 'Yes' to Student Presence in General Practice Consultations: Politeness Theory Insights”;

Geoffrey Nunberg in “The Way We Talk Now”; Per-Olof Hasselgren in “Body Language from

Head to Toe”; Zsófia Domján in “Applying Linguistics in Illness and Healthcare Contexts”;

and Natalie Dalen in “Doctor’s Talk” — all shed light on the uniqueness of communicative

culture in doctor-patient interaction and the significance of euphemisms. In the influential book

“On Death and Dying”, Elisabeth Kübler-Ross emphasizes the necessity for medical

professionals to communicate incurable or life-threatening diagnoses using euphemisms.

Additionally, works such as “Speaking of Disease and Death” by Kathryn Burridge and Réka

Ágnes Benczes are considered some of the most important works in the field. Australian

scholar Antony Herbert, in his academic articles “The Role of Euphemisms in Healthcare

Communication”, along with Smith R. and Kelly N. in their article “Global Attempts to Avoid

Talking Directly About Death and Dying”, and Tyler M. & Ogden J. (2005) in “Doctors’ Use

of Euphemisms and Its Impact on Patients’ Beliefs About Health: An Experimental Study of

Heart Failure”, as well as “The Impact of Euphemisms in Medical Communication” (Smith J. et

al., 2018), and Dr. Shah in “A Guide to Healthcare Euphemisms” — all contribute important

insights into the role of euphemistic language in medical settings. Beatrice Warren has also

analyzed how euphemisms may lead to semantic ambiguity or misunderstanding.

Conclusion.

Euphemisms help soften the harsh realities of illness and patients' critical conditions, leading to

more positive outcomes and reduced psychological burden. Especially in healthcare,

euphemisms stabilize patients' emotional state, protect them from excessive stress, and improve

doctor-patient communication. Across cultures, euphemisms are used to maintain social

harmony, reduce psychological distress, and reflect societal attitudes toward health and illness.

This study analyzes theoretical views from scholars to contemporary doctors, the semantic

strategies of euphemisms, and their communicative impact in medicine.

References:


background image

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

ISSN: 2692-5206, Impact Factor: 12,23

American Academic publishers, volume 05, issue 06,2025

Journal:

https://www.academicpublishers.org/journals/index.php/ijai

page 1377

1. Keith Allan, & Kate Burridge. 1991. Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as

Shield and Weapon. New York: Oxford University Press. (pp. 45-47).

2. Jutel, A. G. (2024). Putting a name to it: Diagnosis in contemporary society (2nd ed., pp.

45–63). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

3. Segal, J. Z. (2008). Health and the rhetoric of medicine (232 pp.). Carbondale, IL:

Southern Illinois

University

Press.

ohiostatepress.org+9siupress.com+9journals.uchicago.edu+9

4.

Hyde, M. J. (2001). Dying virtues: Medical ethics and the dying patient (approx. 240

pp.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

5.

Keränen, L. B. (2013). Scientific characters: Rhetoric, politics, and trust in breast cancer

research (x, 243 pp.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

6.

Kübler- Ross, E. (1969). On death and dying (4th ed.; viii, 200 pp.). New York, NY:

Macmillan.

7. Goldman, B. (2014). The secret language of doctors: Cracking the code of hospital culture.

Toronto, Canada: HarperCollins.

8. Shanahan, F. (2020). The language of illness. Dublin, Ireland: Liberties Press.

9. Rees, C. E., Knight, L. V., & Wilkinson, C. E. (2007). “Thinking ‘no’ but saying ‘yes’ to

student presence in general practice consultations: Politeness theory insights.” Medical

Education, 41(8), 823–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02815.x

10. Nunberg, G. (2001). The way we talk now: Commentaries on language and culture from

NPR's Fresh Air. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

11. Domján, Zs. (2021). Applying linguistics in illness and healthcare contexts. In Proceedings

of the XX International Conference of Young Linguists (pp. 41–53). ELTE, Budapest.

12. Dalen, N. (2018). Doctor’s talk: Communication patterns in medical consultations.

https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/64720

References

Keith Allan, & Kate Burridge. 1991. Euphemism and Dysphemism: Language Used as Shield and Weapon. New York: Oxford University Press. (pp. 45-47).

Jutel, A. G. (2024). Putting a name to it: Diagnosis in contemporary society (2nd ed., pp. 45–63). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Segal, J. Z. (2008). Health and the rhetoric of medicine (232 pp.). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. ohiostatepress.org+9siupress.com+9journals.uchicago.edu+9

 Hyde, M. J. (2001). Dying virtues: Medical ethics and the dying patient (approx. 240 pp.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

 Keränen, L. B. (2013). Scientific characters: Rhetoric, politics, and trust in breast cancer research (x, 243 pp.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

 KüblerRoss, E. (1969). On death and dying (4th ed.; viii, 200 pp.). New York, NY: Macmillan.

Goldman, B. (2014). The secret language of doctors: Cracking the code of hospital culture. Toronto, Canada: HarperCollins.

Shanahan, F. (2020). The language of illness. Dublin, Ireland: Liberties Press.

Rees, C. E., Knight, L. V., & Wilkinson, C. E. (2007). “Thinking ‘no’ but saying ‘yes’ to student presence in general practice consultations: Politeness theory insights.” Medical Education, 41(8), 823–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02815.x

Nunberg, G. (2001). The way we talk now: Commentaries on language and culture from NPR's Fresh Air. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Domján, Zs. (2021). Applying linguistics in illness and healthcare contexts. In Proceedings of the XX International Conference of Young Linguists (pp. 41–53). ELTE, Budapest.

Dalen, N. (2018). Doctor’s talk: Communication patterns in medical consultations. https://www.duo.uio.no/handle/10852/64720