Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajahi/Volume04Issue11-05

Keywords:

Chickpea sowing date varieties

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of sowing dates on the protein, oil, non-nitrogenous extractive substances, and maturation levels in chickpea grains grown under slightly saline soil conditions. The findings indicate the impact of sowing time on the chemical composition of chickpea, including its nutritional and medicinal properties.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

26


American Journal Of Agriculture And Horticulture Innovations
(ISSN

2771-2559)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

Pages:

26-33

OCLC

1290679216
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

This study investigates the effect of sowing dates on the protein, oil, non-nitrogenous extractive substances, and
maturation levels in chickpea grains grown under slightly saline soil conditions. The findings indicate the impact of
sowing time on the chemical composition of chickpea, including its nutritional and medicinal properties.

KEYWORDS

Chickpea, sowing date,

varieties, grain, protein, oil, maturation level, “FLIP98

-140c-(GulDU-

ToshDAU),” “FLIP98

-

183c-

(Halima),” “FLIP98

-

152c,” “FLIP98

-116c-

(MirOz),” “Uzbekistan

-

32.”

.

INTRODUCTION

Research Article

NUTRITIONAL AND MEDICINAL VALUE OF CHICKPEA GRAIN

Submission Date:

November 19, 2024,

Accepted Date:

November 24, 2024,

Published Date:

November 29, 2024

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajahi/Volume04Issue11-05


Mirsharipova Guljakhan Kamalovna

Associate Professor, Department of Agro-Soil Science and Reclamation, Gulistan State University, Uzbekistan

ORCID ID: - https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5760-8474

Komilov Nozimjon Abdurakhimovich

Teacher, Department of Agro-Soil Science and Reclamation, Gulistan State University, Uzbekistan

ORCID ID: - https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3184-8129

Rahmonkulov Kаhramon, son Oo Ravshan

M

aster’s degree, Department of Agro

-Soil Science and Reclamation, Gulistan State University, Uzbekistan

ORCID ID: - https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3458-5237



Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajahi

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

27


American Journal Of Agriculture And Horticulture Innovations
(ISSN

2771-2559)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

Pages:

26-33

OCLC

1290679216
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

In the context of ensuring sufficient agricultural

production to meet the needs of the population, it is

necessary to further deepen agricultural reforms and

create an effective system of measures aimed at

ensuring food security. One of the key tasks is the

increase in leguminous grain crops, particularly those

rich in proteins.

Chickpea, as one of the most valuable crops,

contributes not only to solving protein issues but also

to increasing grain production, maintaining and

improving soil fertility, and ensuring the production of

environmentally friendly products. It accumulates

significant amounts of organic matter in the soil,

improves nitrogen balance, converts difficultly soluble

phosphates into plant-available forms, and enhances

the soil’s water

-physical properties. Chickpea residues

decompose more quickly compared to cereal residues,

effectively protecting the soil from wind and water

erosion and ensuring additional protein production [3;

11; 12; 17].

The human daily intake of protein should average 90-

100 grams, which constitutes approximately 12% of the

total caloric intake [6]. Chickpeas are among the most

valuable legumes in terms of their nutritional content,

containing over 80 elements beneficial for the human

div, including proteins, fats, and vitamins.

Chickpeas stand out among all legumes due to their

high nutritional value and richness in vitamins and

other biologically valuable substances. The grains

contain more than 80 elements beneficial to the

human div.

Due to their high nutritional content, chickpeas are in

high demand for food and feed purposes. Chickpea

grains contain 25-30% protein, 4-7% oil, 47-60% non-

nitrogenous extractive substances, 2.4-12.8% cellulose,

4.0% ash, phosphorus, potassium, and various vitamins:

A (carotene), E, C, PP, and B vitamins (B1 thiamine, B2

riboflavin, B4 choline, B6 pyridoxine), as well as more

than 10 beneficial microelements (iron - 2.6 mg, zinc -

2.9 mg, iodine - 3.4 mg, copper - 0.7 mg, manganese -

2.1 mg, selenium - 28.5 mg, molybdenum - 60.2 mg,

boron - 0.5 mg, silicon - 92 mg, cobalt - 95 mg). This

composition helps prevent anemia and, in terms of

energy and satiety, makes chickpeas comparable to

livestock meat [3; 7].

M.I. Smirnova-Ikonnikova points out that chickpea

grains contain essential amino acids such as arginine

(9.5

12.5%), histidine (1.6

3.1%), lysine (2.2

6.1%),

methionine (1.6

2.2%), tyrosine (1.5

2.9%), tryptophan

(0.8

1.1%), cysteine (0.7

0.8%), with the main part of

the protein being in the form of globulin. The fats in

chickpea grains are mainly semi-drying, and they

contain up to 2% phosphatides (lecithin), which

enhance food properties.

When chickpea grains are added to mixed feed, their

digestibility improves. The stems and leaves are rich in

oxalic and malic acids. The straw is unsuitable for cattle

but serves as a good feed for sheep. In sheep farming,

young lambs up to six months old are supplemented


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

28


American Journal Of Agriculture And Horticulture Innovations
(ISSN

2771-2559)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

Pages:

26-33

OCLC

1290679216
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

with milk made from chickpea grain, promoting faster

and stronger growth.

Chickpeas are rich in essential amino acids such as

lysine, arginine, histidine, tyrosine, cysteine, and

others, which are crucial for both human and livestock

health. These amino acids cannot be synthesized by

the div and must be obtained through food.

Chickpeas do not have specific medicinal properties

but are beneficial to human health due to their

chemical composition. Omega-3 and omega-6 fatty

acids, iron, and folic acid help restore the div,

strengthen the immune system, and enhance the

nervous system. Due to the presence of folic acid,

chickpeas are also recommended for use by pregnant

women and those planning to conceive.

Chickpeas help detoxify the div, relieve bronchitis,

and chickpea decoction aids in preventing poisoning.

Young chickpea shoots are considered effective for

managing diabetes. However, it is not recommended

for breastfeeding mothers and children under six years

old [5].

Abu Ali Ibn Sina, in his work "The Canon of Medicine,"

describes the medicinal properties of chickpeas, noting

their unique benefits in lung nutrition, the use of

chickpea oil for treating burns, ulcers, and itching, and

its boiled water for alleviating toothache and milk

swelling. Additionally, chickpeas are known for their

ability to dissolve kidney stones and their positive

effects on intestinal diseases, diarrhea, and urinary

organ treatment in France and the United Kingdom.

Extracts from the stems and leaves, as well as apple,

lemon, and oxalic acids, are widely used in South-East

Asian countries such as India, China, and Burma for

medicinal purposes [18].

D.A. Bender and A.E. Bender emphasize that chickpeas

are an excellent source of copper, folic acid, and zinc,

as well as protein, vitamin A, and iron. They are highly

nutritious and serve as a healthy carbohydrate source

for individuals with insulin resistance or diabetes.

As noted by E. Stepanova, consuming 100 grams of

boiled chickpeas per day is sufficient to provide the

div with essential nutrients. For individuals with a

weak stomach, it is recommended to limit intake to 30

grams per day. Chickpeas are superior to other

legumes in terms of their nutritional value (329 kcal/100

g mass) [16].

Chickpea milk, obtained from chickpea grains, has the

same nutritional and medicinal properties as cow and

soybean milk. Additionally, due to the composition of

semi-drying fatty acids in chickpea, lipid formation is

reduced [2].

Chickpea grains are used to prepare chickpea flour,

various side dishes, soups, omelets, pastries, bread,

jelly, and other dishes. When mixed with wheat flour

(10-20%), it enhances the quality and nutritional value

of bread, confectionery, and pasta products. Chickpea

flour is also used in children's food. Chickpea bran,

roasted and mixed with tomato paste, raisins, sesame,

or walnut kernels, is used to make sweet bars. In some

countries, including India and Azerbaijan, chickpea acid


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

29


American Journal Of Agriculture And Horticulture Innovations
(ISSN

2771-2559)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

Pages:

26-33

OCLC

1290679216
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

is used as a substitute for vinegar and in the

preparation of cold beverages.

V.G. Klimenko's research shows that the protein

content in all chickpea varieties ranges from 12.6% to

31.0%, with this variation dependent on soil-climatic

conditions and protein biosynthesis [9].

The data in the literature suggests that the protein

content in chickpea grains changes depending on

cultivation techniques [13; 14]. This underlines the

necessity of developing scientific guidelines for

selecting and cultivating varieties suited to the soil-

climatic conditions of each region [1; 11].

METHODS

Our research was conducted at the experimental

production base of the Institute of Grain Legume

Research in Sirdarya, under irrigation conditions with

slightly saline soils. The soil had less than 1% residual dry

matter, with an overall salinity of 0.030-0.033%,

chloride levels often exceeding the toxicity threshold,

reaching up to 0.036%, sodium content of 0.047%, and

sulfate content of 0.130-0.134%.

The experimental field is located in the southeastern

part of the Mirzachul region, characterized by a sharply

continental climate with hot, dry summers and

moderate winters. The region experiences significant

temperature variations between day and night and

between summer and winter.

The experiment utilized chickpea varieties from the

globa

l collection, including “FLIP98

-140c-(GulDU-

ToshDAU)”, “FLIP98

-116c-

(MirOz)”, “FLIP98

-

152c”,

“Halima” and “Uzbekistan

-

32.”

The sowing of chickpea seeds occurred in the second

half of October (autumn) and the first ten days of

March (spring), with seeds germinated under the

natural moisture conditions of the soil. General

agronomic practices were followed, and the preceding

crop was autumn wheat. The variants were arranged in

4 replications, with each plot covering 48 m².

Data collection and analysis were performed following

the "Methodology for State Variety Testing of

Agricultural Crops" (1985, 1989) [10], and statistical

analysis was carried out using B.A. Dospekhov's (1985)

guide to variance analysis and the SPSS-17 program [7].

The technological quality indicators of the grain,

including:

-Protein content (Kjeldahl method)

- Oil content (Soxhlet apparatus using a solvent

extraction method)

- Cellulose content (Henneberg and Stohmann

method)

- Ash content (Mendel method)

- Maturity level of the seeds

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The results from the experiment showed that sowing

dates had a significant impact on the chemical

composition of chickpea grains:

Water content: Chickpea grains sown in spring had

water content up to 8.5-9.6%, while autumn sowing


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

30


American Journal Of Agriculture And Horticulture Innovations
(ISSN

2771-2559)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

Pages:

26-33

OCLC

1290679216
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

showed a slight decrease, with the range from 8.0-

9.4%.

Oil, non-nitrogenous extractive substances, and total

energy showed significant differences across varieties.

Fiber content: Chickpeas sown in spring had higher

fiber content compared to autumn sowing, except for

the “FLIP98

-140c-(GulDU-

ToshDAU)” variety, which

showed the opposite trend. “FLIP98

-140c-(GulDU-

ToshDAU)” and “FLIP98

-183c-

(Halima)” varieties had

lower fiber content (4.9-4.98%), while the control

variety “Uzbekistan

-

32” had the highest fiber conten

t

(9.45-9.65%) in both sowing dates.

Oil content: The oil content in chickpea grains from

autumn sowing was 0.06-1.96% higher than in spring

sowing. “FLIP98

-

152c” had the highest oil content of

6.47% when sown in autumn.

Ash content: Sowing date had little effect on the ash

content of chickpea grains.

Non-nitrogenous extractive substances: These were

higher in autumn-sown chickpeas. The highest non-

nitrogenous extractive substances were found in

“FLIP98

-116c-

(MirOz)” (66.83%) in autumn sowing, and

the lowes

t in “Uzbekistan

-

32” (60.14%) in spring

sowing.

Regarding oil content, chickpea seeds sown in the

spring had 0.06-1.96% lower oil content compared to

those sown in the autumn. Among the varieties

studied, the “FLIP98

-

152c” variety had the highest oil

content (6.47%) when sown in autumn.

The data analysis indicated that planting time had little

impact on the ash content of chickpea seeds. The

lowest ash content was observed in the “FLIP98

-183c-

(Halima)” variety when sown in autumn (3.49%). The

amount of nitrogen-free extractive substances was

higher in all varieties when sown in autumn. The

highest level of nitrogen-free extractive substances

was found in the “FLIP98

-116c-

(MirOz)” variety

(66.83%) when planted in autumn, while the lowest

was in the

“Uzbekistan

-

32” variety (60.14%) when planted in

spring.

According to the experimental results (Table 3.18),

chickpea varieties sown in autumn had higher total

energy value. The highest energy value was recorded

for the “FLIP98

-183c-

(Halima)” variety (361

.67%), while

the lowest was in the “Uzbekistan

-

32” variety (306.12

-

309.5%).

The protein content in the seeds was affected not only

by the planting time but also by the biological

characteristics of the varieties. When the “Uzbekistan

-

32” variety was sown i

n the spring, it had a protein

content of 20.28%. The “FLIP98

-

152c” variety had the

highest protein content at 24.28%, while the “FLIP98

-

140c-(GulDU-

ToshDAU)” variety had the lowest

protein content at 18.8%. The variability in protein

content between the varieties suggests that the

biological characteristics of the varieties influence this

trait. Specifically, the “FLIP98

-

152c” variety had 4.0%

more protein than the control variety, indicating a


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

31


American Journal Of Agriculture And Horticulture Innovations
(ISSN

2771-2559)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

Pages:

26-33

OCLC

1290679216
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

good match between genotype and environment.

When chickpeas were sown in the spring, the protein

content in the seeds ranged from 18.8% to 24.28%, while

in the autumn sowing, the protein content decreased

by 1.25-2.59%. These data confirm that spring sowing

results in a higher protein content in the seeds.

Conversely, when planted in the autumn, the oil

content in the seeds was higher. Chickpeas, widely

consumed in our diet, are appreciated for their quick

and easy cooking characteristics, making them of

practical significance.

The cooking time of chickpea varieties was studied,

and it was found that the cooking time for the varieties

“FLIP98

-140c-(GulDU-

ToshDAU)”,

“FLIP98

-183c-

(Halima)” and “FLIP98

-

152c” was 30 minutes, while for

the “Uzbekistan

-

32” variety it was 40 minutes, and for

“FLIP98

-116c-

(MirOz)” it was 50 mi

nutes. Therefore,

the

varieties

“FLIP98

-140c-(GulDU-

ToshDAU)”,

“FLIP98

-183c-

(Halima)” and “FLIP98

-

152c” are not only

suitable for food and energy sources but also can be

considered among resource-efficient varieties.

Table

Effect of Planting Time on Seed Quality Indicators (Average of 3 Years of Data)

(

Data from "Grain products research institute"

)

Indicator

Varieties

Uzbekistan-32

FLIP 98-140с-

(GulDU-

ToshDAU)

FLIP 98-116с -

(MirOz)

FLIP 98-152с

FLIP 98-183с-

(Halima)

planting time

spring

autumn

spring

autumn

spring

autumn

spring autumn spring autumn

1.

Moisture
content, %

8,5

8,0

9,4

9,2

9,2

9,2

8,8

8,0

9,6

9,4

2.

Protein, %

20,28

17,66

18,8

17,55

19,55

18,93

24,28

21,69

19,90

19,43

3.

Crude fiber, %

9,65

9,45

4,9

7,5

5,72

5,24

6,49

5,43

4,98

4,69

4.

Oil, %

4,99

6,06

4,79

5,0

5,18

5,24

4,51

6,47

5,11

5,18

5.

Ash content, %

3,86

4,10

3,60

3,67

3,67

3,76

4,00

4,04

3,76

3,49

6.

Nitrogen-free
extracts, %

60,14

63,77

64,91

65,77

65,89

66,83

60,72

62,37

66,66

66,81

7.

Total

energy

value, kcal

306,12 309,5

310,75

314,27

314,37

315,45

313,5

319,9

314,54 361,67

CONCLUSIONS

Sowing date significantly influenced the chemical

composition of chickpea grains. Autumn sowing led to


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

32


American Journal Of Agriculture And Horticulture Innovations
(ISSN

2771-2559)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

Pages:

26-33

OCLC

1290679216
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

lower protein content and higher oil content,

compared to spring sowing. These results confirm that

spring sowing leads to higher protein content, while

autumn sowing enhances oil content. Introducing

chickpea varieties such as “FLIP98

-

152c” and “Halima”

in Sirdarya could provide new opportunities for

protein-rich crops and increased yields.

REFERENCES

1.

Abdiev A.A. Growth, development, and yield of

chickpea varieties sown at different times and

rates in the foothill dryland areas of Kashkadarya

region. // Author's abstract of dissertation for the

degree of Candidate of Agricultural Sciences.

UzNIIH.

Tashkent, 2008.

2.

Anikeeva V.N., Antipova L.V. Methods of producing

chickpea milk. // International Agricultural Journal.

Moscow, 2005.

pp. 63-64.

3.

Atabaeva K.N., Khudaikulov J.B. Plant Science.

Textbook. Tashkent, 2018.

pp. 192-196.

4.

Bender D.A., Bender A.E. 2005. Dictionary of Food

and Nutrition. New York: Oxford University Press.

ISBN 0198609612.

5.

Bushulyana O.B. et al. Modern Technology of

Chickpea Cultivation. https://farming.org.ua.

6.

Vavilov P.P., Posypanov G.S. Leguminous crops and

the problem of plant protein. -M.: Rosselkhozizdat,

1983.

p. 27.

7.

Donskaya

Maria

Vladimirovna.

Chickpeas.

Published

June

28,

2022.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?vqGERAN-GEIjM

8.

Dospikhov B.A. Field Experiment Methodology. -

Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985. - 351 p.

9.

Klimenko V.G. The Protein Content of Legume

Seeds. - Kishinev: Shtiintsa, 1978. - pp. 193-197.

10.

Methodology of State Variety Testing of

Agricultural Crops. Vol-2.

Moscow, 1989.

194 p.

11.

Mirsharipova G.K. "To Choose Chickpea Varieties

Under Mirzachul Conditions and Determine

Appropriate Dates and Schemes." // Au

thor’s

abstract of dissertation for the degree of

Candidate of Agricultural Sciences. UzNIIH.

Tashkent, 2010.

12.

Mirsharipova G.K., Turdimetov Sh.M. The Effect of

Soil Agrochemical Properties on Chickpea

Cultivation. // Uzbekistan Biology Journal.

Tashkent: "Fan" Publishing, Uzbekistan Academy

of Sciences, 2007, No. 4, pp. 59-62.

13.

Mirsharipova G.K. Dependence of Harvest

Structure and Productivity of Pea Varieties on

Forage Area Approval. Texas Journal of Agriculture

and Biological Sciences, 22-11-2022. pp. 71-75. Zien

Journals:

[Link

to

the

article](https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjabs/a

rticle/view/2773)

14.

Mirsharipova G.K. Fractional Composition of

Chickpea Seeds in Irrigated Agriculture Conditions.

// Bulletin of Agricultural Science of Uzbekistan, No.

5 (11), 3 (special edition), 2023, pp. 262-264.


background image

Volume 04 Issue 11-2024

33


American Journal Of Agriculture And Horticulture Innovations
(ISSN

2771-2559)

VOLUME

04

ISSUE

11

Pages:

26-33

OCLC

1290679216
















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

15.

Smirnova-Ikonnikova M.I. Protein Content in

Leguminous Crops. // Bulletin of Agricultural Crops,

1962.

No. 7.

16.

Stepanova E. 6 Interesting Facts About Chickpeas.

[Link

to

the

article](https://zira.uz/ru/2018/11/22/nut)

17.

Turdimetov S.M., Mirsharipova G.K., Botirova L.A.,

Abdujalilova A.X., Mustafakulov D.M. Impact of

Legume Crops on the Agrochemical and

Agrophysical Properties of Soil in Mirzachol

Conditions. Journal of Critical Reviews, ISSN-2394-

5125, Vol. 7, Issue 17, 2020. pp. 2220-2234.

18.

Ernazorov I., Kholliev A.N. Chickpeas. // UzR DITAF.

Tashkent, 1995. Pp. 215-217.

19.

[Link

to

the

article]

(https://iim.uz/recommended/view?idq24)

References

Abdiev A.A. Growth, development, and yield of chickpea varieties sown at different times and rates in the foothill dryland areas of Kashkadarya region. // Author's abstract of dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Agricultural Sciences. UzNIIH. – Tashkent, 2008.

Anikeeva V.N., Antipova L.V. Methods of producing chickpea milk. // International Agricultural Journal. – Moscow, 2005. – pp. 63-64.

Atabaeva K.N., Khudaikulov J.B. Plant Science. Textbook. Tashkent, 2018. – pp. 192-196.

Bender D.A., Bender A.E. 2005. Dictionary of Food and Nutrition. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198609612.

Bushulyana O.B. et al. Modern Technology of Chickpea Cultivation. https://farming.org.ua.

Vavilov P.P., Posypanov G.S. Leguminous crops and the problem of plant protein. -M.: Rosselkhozizdat, 1983. – p. 27.

Donskaya Maria Vladimirovna. Chickpeas. Published June 28, 2022. https://www.youtube.com/watch?vqGERAN-GEIjM

Dospikhov B.A. Field Experiment Methodology. - Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1985. - 351 p.

Klimenko V.G. The Protein Content of Legume Seeds. - Kishinev: Shtiintsa, 1978. - pp. 193-197.

Methodology of State Variety Testing of Agricultural Crops. Vol-2. – Moscow, 1989. – 194 p.

Mirsharipova G.K. "To Choose Chickpea Varieties Under Mirzachul Conditions and Determine Appropriate Dates and Schemes." // Author’s abstract of dissertation for the degree of Candidate of Agricultural Sciences. UzNIIH. – Tashkent, 2010.

Mirsharipova G.K., Turdimetov Sh.M. The Effect of Soil Agrochemical Properties on Chickpea Cultivation. // Uzbekistan Biology Journal. Tashkent: "Fan" Publishing, Uzbekistan Academy of Sciences, 2007, No. 4, pp. 59-62.

Mirsharipova G.K. Dependence of Harvest Structure and Productivity of Pea Varieties on Forage Area Approval. Texas Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences, 22-11-2022. pp. 71-75. Zien Journals: [Link to the article](https://zienjournals.com/index.php/tjabs/article/view/2773)

Mirsharipova G.K. Fractional Composition of Chickpea Seeds in Irrigated Agriculture Conditions. // Bulletin of Agricultural Science of Uzbekistan, No. 5 (11), 3 (special edition), 2023, pp. 262-264.

Smirnova-Ikonnikova M.I. Protein Content in Leguminous Crops. // Bulletin of Agricultural Crops, 1962. – No. 7.

Stepanova E. 6 Interesting Facts About Chickpeas. [Link to the article](https://zira.uz/ru/2018/11/22/nut)

Turdimetov S.M., Mirsharipova G.K., Botirova L.A., Abdujalilova A.X., Mustafakulov D.M. Impact of Legume Crops on the Agrochemical and Agrophysical Properties of Soil in Mirzachol Conditions. Journal of Critical Reviews, ISSN-2394-5125, Vol. 7, Issue 17, 2020. pp. 2220-2234.

Ernazorov I., Kholliev A.N. Chickpeas. // UzR DITAF. – Tashkent, 1995. Pp. 215-217.