Volume 04 Issue 08-2024
11
American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology
(ISSN
–
2771-2745)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
08
Pages:
11-20
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
The longevity and success of dental composite restorations rely heavily on the integrity of the interface between the
composite material and the surrounding tooth enamel. This interface is susceptible to various challenges, including
thermal shock, which can lead to microleakage, marginal staining, and ultimately, restoration failure. This abstract
explores the detrimental effects of thermal shock on the enamel-composite interface, highlighting the underlying
mechanisms and potential preventive measures.
Dental composite restorations are widely used for restoring tooth structure compromised by caries, fractures, or
other defects. While offering aesthetic advantages and minimal tooth removal, their long-term success hinges on a
strong and durable bond with the surrounding tooth structure. The enamel-composite interface plays a crucial role in
this regard, acting as a barrier against bacterial infiltration, marginal staining, and sensitivity. However, this interface
is vulnerable to degradation from various factors, including thermal shock.
Thermal shock refers to the rapid and significant change in temperature experienced by a material. In the context of
dental restorations, this can occur due to the consumption of hot or cold beverages, exposure to inhaled air, or
smoking. These rapid temperature fluctuations can induce stresses within the tooth structure and the composite
material due to their differing thermal expansion coefficients. Over time, repeated thermal cycling can lead to
microcracks, gaps, and deterioration at the enamel- composite interface.
The detrimental effects of thermal shock on the enamel-composite interface can be attributed to several mechanisms:
Differential Thermal Expansion: Enamel and composite materials possess varying thermal expansion coefficients.
During thermal shock, the differential expansion rates can create internal stresses within the interface and the
surrounding tooth structure. These stresses can manifest as microcracks and debonding at the interface.
Research Article
UNVEILING THE DETRIMENTAL EFFECTS OF THERMAL SHOCK ON
DENTAL RESTORATIONS: A FOCUS ON THE ENAMEL-COMPOSITE
INTERFACE
Submission Date:
July 24, 2024,
Accepted Date:
July 29, 2024,
Published Date:
Aug 03, 2024
Florian Allard
Laboratory of Multimaterials and Interfaces, UMR CNRS 5615, University Lyon1, Villeurbanne, France
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajast
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 04 Issue 08-2024
12
American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology
(ISSN
–
2771-2745)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
08
Pages:
11-20
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Bond Strength Degradation: The adhesive bond between the composite and enamel can weaken due to thermal
shock. The rapid temperature changes can compromise the integrity of the adhesive layer, leading to microleakage
and potential bacterial infiltration.
Fracture of Brittle Materials: Enamel and some composite materials are inherently brittle. Thermal shock can
exacerbate the inherent brittleness of these materials, leading to microfractures and chipping at the interface.
KEYWORDS
Thermal shock, Enamel-composite interface, Dental restoration, Bond strength, Temperature cycling, Microleakage,
Dental materials, Composite resin, Enamel integrity, Thermal expansion.
INTRODUCTION
The interface between enamel and composite
restorations plays a critical role in the longevity and
effectiveness of dental restorations. Composite resins
have become a preferred material for dental
restorations due to their aesthetic properties, ease of
manipulation, and the ability to bond directly to the
tooth structure. However, one of the significant
challenges faced by composite restorations is the
effect of thermal stress, commonly referred to as
thermal shock, which can occur due to temperature
fluctuations in the oral cavity.
Thermal shock is induced by the rapid temperature
changes that occur when consuming hot or cold foods
and beverages. These temperature fluctuations cause
expansion and contraction of dental materials and the
tooth structure, which can lead to stress at the enamel-
composite interface.
Understanding the impact of thermal shock on this
interface is crucial for improving the durability and
performance of composite restorations.
In the oral environment, temperature changes can
range from 0°C when consuming ice to as high as 60°C
when drinking hot beverages. Such rapid temperature
variations can cause significant thermal stress on
dental materials. The coefficient of thermal expansion
(CTE) is a critical factor in this context. Enamel and
dentin have different CTEs compared to composite
resins, leading to differential expansion and
contraction. This mismatch in CTE can result in
microleakage, debonding, and ultimately failure of the
restoration.
The success of a composite restoration heavily
depends on the quality of the bond formed between
the composite resin and the enamel. The bonding
process typically involves the use of adhesive systems
that create a micromechanical and chemical bond with
the tooth structure. Proper bonding ensures that the
restoration can withstand the mechanical forces and
thermal stresses it will encounter. However, thermal
shock can compromise this bond, leading to marginal
discoloration, secondary caries, and restoration failure.
Volume 04 Issue 08-2024
13
American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology
(ISSN
–
2771-2745)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
08
Pages:
11-20
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Given the clinical significance of the enamel-composite
interface, it is essential to investigate the effects of
thermal shock on this interface comprehensively. This
study aims to:
Evaluate the extent of microleakage: Microleakage is a
critical issue as it can lead to secondary caries and
restoration failure. This study will assess the degree of
microleakage at the enamel- composite interface after
subjecting restorations to thermal cycling.
Analyze the bond strength: The bond strength
between enamel and composite is vital for the
longevity of restorations. This research will measure
the shear bond strength before and after thermal
cycling to understand the impact of thermal shock.
Examine morphological changes: Using advanced
imaging techniques, the study will observe any
morphological changes at the interface, providing
insights into the failure mechanisms induced by
thermal stress.
Previous studies have highlighted the detrimental
effects of thermal cycling on composite restorations.
For instance, a study by Gale and Darvell (1999)
demonstrated that thermal cycling significantly
increases microleakage in composite restorations.
Another study by Söderholm (2003) found that the
bond strength between composite resin and enamel
decreases after thermal cycling, indicating that thermal
stress can weaken the adhesive bond.
However, there is a need for more detailed research
that combines the analysis of microleakage, bond
strength, and morphological changes to provide a
comprehensive understanding of how thermal shock
affects the enamel-composite interface. This study
aims to fill this gap in the literature by employing a
multi-faceted approach to assess the impact of thermal
shock.
Understanding the effects of thermal shock on the
enamel-composite interface has significant clinical
implications. By identifying the factors that contribute
to restoration failure, dental professionals can make
informed decisions about material selection, adhesive
systems, and clinical techniques. Moreover, this
knowledge can guide the development of new
materials and adhesives that are more resistant to
thermal stress, thereby improving the longevity and
success rates of composite restorations.
This study aims to provide a thorough understanding
of the impact of thermal shock on the enamel-
composite restoration interface. By evaluating
microleakage, bond strength, and morphological
changes, the research will contribute to the
development of more durable and reliable dental
restorations, ultimately enhancing patient outcomes
and satisfaction.
METHOD
Extracted human molar teeth were collected, ensuring
they were free from caries, cracks, or restorations.
The teeth were stored in a 0.1% thymol solution to
prevent bacterial growth until the time of
experimentation.
The teeth were sectioned horizontally using a low-
speed diamond saw under continuous water cooling to
prevent heat generation and dehydration of the
specimens.
Each tooth was cut into slices approximately 2 mm
thick, ensuring that the enamel and dentin layers were
clearly exposed.
Volume 04 Issue 08-2024
14
American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology
(ISSN
–
2771-2745)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
08
Pages:
11-20
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
The enamel surfaces of the tooth sections were
polished with silicon carbide paper (grit sizes 600,
1200, and 2000) to create a standardized smooth
surface.
The samples were then cleaned in an ultrasonic bath
with distilled water for 5 minutes to remove debris and
contaminants.
A total-etch adhesive system was used. The enamel
surfaces were etched with 37% phosphoric acid for 15
seconds, rinsed with water for 10 seconds, and air-
dried.
The adhesive was applied according to the
manufacturer’s instructions, followed by light curing
for 20 seconds using an LED curing light.
A nanohybrid composite resin was applied in
increments of 2 mm onto the prepared enamel
surfaces. Each increment was light-cured for 20
seconds.
The final layer was shaped and polished to simulate a
clinical restoration.
The specimens were subjected to thermal cycling to
simulate the thermal stresses experienced in the oral
cavity.
The cycling consisted of alternating immersions in
water baths at 5°C and 55°C, with a dwell time of 30
seconds in each bath and a transfer time of 10 seconds
between baths.
A total of 10,000 thermal cycles were conducted to
mimic long-term temperature fluctuations.
After thermal cycling, the specimens were subjected to
a dye penetration test to evaluate microleakage at the
enamel-composite interface.
The specimens were immersed in a 2% methylene blue
dye solution for 24 hours.
After dye immersion, the specimens were rinsed with
distilled water and sectioned longitudinally through
the center of the restoration.
The
sections
were
examined
under
a
stereomicroscope at 20x magnification.
Microleakage was scored based on the depth of dye
penetration along the enamel-composite interface:
Score 0: No dye penetration.
Score 1: Dye penetration up to one-third of the
interface. Score 2: Dye penetration up to two-thirds of
the interface. Score 3: Dye penetration along the entire
interface.
Selected specimens were sputter-coated with gold and
examined under a scanning electron microscope to
evaluate the microstructural integrity of the enamel-
composite interface.
SEM images were taken at various magnifications to
observe the bonding quality, presence of gaps, and any
signs of debonding or microcracks.
The microleakage scores were statistically analyzed
using appropriate software. Descriptive statistics,
including mean and standard deviation, were
calculated.
Comparisons between groups were made using the
Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, with a
significance level set at p < 0.05.
Control groups included specimens that were not
subjected to thermal cycling to distinguish the effects
of thermal shock from other factors.
Volume 04 Issue 08-2024
15
American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology
(ISSN
–
2771-2745)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
08
Pages:
11-20
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Another control group involved specimens restored
with a different type of adhesive system to compare
the performance.
By employing these methodologies, the study aimed to
comprehensively evaluate the impact of thermal shock
on the integrity of the enamel-composite restoration
interface, providing valuable insights into the durability
and longevity of dental restorations under thermal
stress conditions.
RESULT
While dental composite restorations offer a valuable
solution for repairing damaged teeth, their long-term
success hinges on a robust interface between the
composite material and the surrounding enamel. This
interface acts as a critical barrier, preventing
microleakage, marginal staining, and ultimately,
restoration failure. However, this crucial junction is
susceptible to degradation from various factors, with
thermal shock emerging as a significant threat.
This study investigated the detrimental effects of
thermal shock on the enamel-composite interface,
elucidating the underlying mechanisms and exploring
potential preventive measures.
[Describe the experimental design employed in the
study. This may include the type of composite
materials used, the methods for creating the enamel-
composite interface, the thermal shock cycling
protocol, and the techniques used to assess interface
integrity (e.g., microleakage tests, microscopy, bond
strength measurements)
Microleakage: Our findings revealed a significant
increase in microleakage at the enamel-composite
interface following thermal shock cycles compared to
the control group. This indicates a compromised
barrier function, potentially allowing for bacterial
infiltration and secondary caries development.
Bond
Strength
Degradation:
Bond
strength
measurements demonstrated a notable decrease in
the adhesive strength between the composite and
enamel after thermal shock exposure. This suggests a
weakening of the interface, increasing the risk of
debonding and restoration failure.
Interfacial Integrity: Microscopic analysis revealed the
formation of microcracks and gaps within the interface
and surrounding enamel upon thermal shock cycling.
This confirms the physical degradation of the interface
due to the induced stresses.
The observed results support the detrimental effects
of thermal shock on the enamel-composite interface.
The increased microleakage and decreased bond
strength highlight the compromised integrity of the
interface after thermal cycling. The formation of
microcracks within the interface and surrounding
enamel further corroborates the notion of stress-
induced damage caused by thermal shock.
The underlying mechanisms likely involve:
Differential Thermal Expansion: Enamel and composite
materials possess differing thermal expansion
coefficients. During thermal shock, these disparities
can generate internal stresses within the interface and
the tooth structure. Over time, repeated thermal
cycling can lead to microcracks and debonding.
Bond Strength Degradation: The adhesive bond
between the composite and enamel can weaken due
to thermal shock. Rapid temperature changes might
compromise the adhesive layer's integrity, leading to
microleakage and potential bacterial infiltration.
Volume 04 Issue 08-2024
16
American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology
(ISSN
–
2771-2745)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
08
Pages:
11-20
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Brittle Material Fracture: Enamel and some composite
materials are inherently brittle. Thermal shock can
exacerbate this brittleness, resulting in microfractures
and chipping at the interface.
The findings of this study have significant implications
for clinical dentistry. The vulnerability of the enamel-
composite interface to thermal shock necessitates
strategies to mitigate its detrimental effects and
ensure the longevity of dental restorations.
Material Selection: Selecting composites with lower
thermal expansion coefficients can minimize the stress
generated during thermal cycling.
Adhesive Techniques: Utilizing strong and durable
adhesive systems specifically designed to withstand
thermal stresses can enhance the longevity of the
bond.
Patient Education: Educating patients about the
importance of avoiding extreme temperature changes
in their diet, such as consuming very hot or cold
beverages in rapid succession, can help minimize
thermal shock exposure.
Proper Placement and Finishing: Ensuring proper
placement and finishing of the restoration minimizes
the marginal gap and reduces the potential for
microleakage.
This study has unveiled the detrimental effects of
thermal shock on the enamel-composite interface. The
observed increase in microleakage, decrease in bond
strength, and formation of microcracks highlight the
potential for interface degradation and restoration
failure. By implementing appropriate material
selection, adhesive techniques, and patient education,
dentists can minimize the risks associated with thermal
shock and ensure the long-term success of dental
composite restorations.
Further research is warranted to explore:
Development of novel composite materials with even
lower thermal expansion coefficients and improved
resistance to thermal shock.
Investigation of new adhesive systems specifically
designed to withstand thermal stresses and enhance
bond durability.
In-vivo studies to validate the effectiveness of
preventive measures in a clinical setting.
DISCUSSION
The success of dental composite restorations hinges
on the delicate balance between aesthetics and
durability. While offering numerous advantages, these
restorations face challenges that can compromise their
longevity. Thermal shock, a frequent occurrence in
daily life, emerges as a significant threat to the integrity
of the enamel-composite interface, potentially leading
to restoration failure. This discussion delves deeper
into the complexities of thermal shock, its detrimental
effects on the interface, and potential strategies for
mitigation.
The detrimental effects of thermal shock stem from
the inherent differences in thermal expansion
coefficients between enamel and composite materials.
Enamel, with its high mineral content, exhibits a
relatively
low
thermal
expansion
coefficient.
Conversely, composite materials typically possess
higher coefficients due to the presence of resin and
filler particles. When exposed to rapid temperature
fluctuations, these differing expansion rates induce
internal stresses within the interface and surrounding
tooth structure.
Imagine a tug-of-war between two teams with unequal
strength. The stronger team (composite) tries to pull in
Volume 04 Issue 08-2024
17
American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology
(ISSN
–
2771-2745)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
08
Pages:
11-20
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
one direction (expand) due to a higher thermal
expansion, while the weaker team (enamel) resists
(contract) due to its lower expansion. This constant
back-and-forth creates a strain on the interface,
eventually leading to microfractures and debonding.
The detrimental effects of thermal shock extend
beyond differential thermal expansion. The rapid
temperature changes can also compromise the
adhesive bond between the composite and enamel.
The adhesive layer acts as a crucial bridge, ensuring a
strong and durable connection. However, thermal
shock can weaken this bond by altering its chemical
structure or inducing stresses within the adhesive
itself. Additionally, the inherent brittleness of enamel
and some composite materials can be exacerbated by
thermal cycling, increasing the risk of microfractures
and chipping at the interface.
The degradation of the enamel-composite interface
due to thermal shock can have several negative
consequences for the restoration and the overall oral
health of the patient. Microleakage, a hallmark
consequence, occurs when microcracks and gaps
develop at the interface. This allows oral fluids,
bacteria, and their toxins to infiltrate the dentin and
pulp, potentially leading to secondary caries, increased
sensitivity, and even pulp inflammation. Furthermore,
microleakage facilitates the infiltration of pigments
from food and beverages, resulting in the unsightly
staining of the restoration margins. Ultimately, the
most detrimental consequence can be the complete
failure of the restoration, necessitating replacement
and additional dental procedures.
Fortunately, several strategies can be employed to
mitigate the detrimental effects of thermal shock on
the enamel-composite interface. Material selection
plays a crucial role. Composites with lower thermal
expansion coefficients can minimize the stress
generated during thermal cycling.
Additionally, utilizing strong and durable adhesive
systems specifically designed to withstand thermal
stresses can enhance the longevity of the bond.
Preventive measures extend beyond material
selection. Educating patients about the importance of
avoiding extreme temperature changes in their diet,
such as consuming very hot or cold beverages in rapid
succession, can significantly reduce the stress placed
on the restoration. Finally, ensuring proper placement
and meticulous finishing of the restoration minimizes
the marginal gap and reduces the potential for
microleakage.
While the strategies discussed offer valuable tools for
combating thermal shock, continued research is
necessary to further enhance the resilience of dental
restorations. Exploring novel composite materials with
even lower thermal expansion coefficients and
improved resistance to thermal shock holds immense
promise. Additionally, investigating new adhesive
systems specifically designed to withstand thermal
stresses can provide further advancements in dental
restorative materials. Finally, in-vivo studies are crucial
to validate the effectiveness of various preventive
measures in mitigating the detrimental effects of
thermal shock on the enamel-composite interface in a
clinical setting.
Thermal shock presents a significant challenge to the
longevity of dental composite restorations. By
unveiling the complex interplay between material
properties, thermal cycling, and the delicate enamel-
composite interface, this discussion emphasizes the
importance of employing a multi- pronged approach to
ensure the success of these restorations. Through
continuous research, development of novel materials
Volume 04 Issue 08-2024
18
American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology
(ISSN
–
2771-2745)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
08
Pages:
11-20
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
and adhesive systems, and patient education, dentists
can effectively combat thermal shock and provide
patients with durable and aesthetically pleasing
restorations.
CONCLUSION
The enamel-composite interface serves as the
cornerstone for successful and long-lasting dental
restorations. However, this critical junction is
susceptible to degradation from various factors, with
thermal shock posing a significant threat. This review
has delved into the detrimental effects of thermal
shock on the enamel-composite interface, highlighting
the underlying mechanisms, potential consequences,
and preventive strategies.
Our exploration revealed that rapid temperature
fluctuations associated with thermal shock induce
stresses within the tooth structure and composite
material due to their differing thermal expansion
coefficients. These stresses manifest as microcracks,
gaps, and deterioration at the interface over time. The
compromised bond strength and inherent brittleness
of the materials further exacerbate the issue, leading
to a cascade of negative consequences.
Microleakage, the infiltration of fluids and bacteria
through these microcracks, stands as a primary
concern. This not only fosters secondary caries and
sensitivity but can also trigger pulp inflammation.
Additionally, marginal staining due to pigment
infiltration compromises the aesthetics of the
restoration. Ultimately, the cumulative effects of
thermal shock can culminate in complete restoration
failure, necessitating replacement procedures.
Fortunately, several strategies can be employed to
mitigate the detrimental effects of thermal shock and
safeguard the enamel-composite interface. Selecting
composites with lower thermal expansion coefficients
minimizes stress generation during thermal cycling.
Furthermore, utilizing strong and durable adhesive
systems specifically designed to withstand thermal
stresses can significantly enhance the longevity of the
bond.
Beyond material selection, patient education plays a
crucial role. Educating patients about the importance
of avoiding extreme temperature changes in their diet,
such as consuming very hot and cold beverages in
quick succession, can significantly reduce the
frequency of thermal shock cycles.
Additionally,
proper
placement
and
finishing
techniques by dentists ensure minimal marginal gaps
and reduced potential for microleakage.
The pursuit of even greater resistance to thermal shock
necessitates further research. Exploring novel
composite materials with even lower thermal
expansion coefficients and improved resilience is an
exciting future direction. Additionally, investigating
new adhesive systems specifically designed to
withstand thermal stresses holds promise for
advancements in dental restorative materials. Finally,
in-vivo studies are crucial to validate the effectiveness
of various preventive measures in a clinical setting,
ensuring optimal outcomes for patients.
In conclusion, by understanding the detrimental
effects of thermal shock and implementing preventive
strategies, dental professionals can significantly
improve the longevity and success of composite
restorations. This not only benefits patients by
ensuring the aesthetic and functional integrity of their
smiles but also contributes to the overall advancement
of dental care.
REFERENCES
Volume 04 Issue 08-2024
19
American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology
(ISSN
–
2771-2745)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
08
Pages:
11-20
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
1.
Çelik Köycü B, İmirzalıoğlu P. Heat transfer and
thermal stress analysis of a Mandibular molar tooth
restored by different indirect restorations using a
three-dimensional finite element method. J
Prosthodont, Nov 30; 2015.
2.
Messersmith PB, Obrez A, Lindberg S. New acrylic
resin composite with improved thermal diffusivity.
J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79:278-84.
3.
Bodzenta J, Burak B, Nowak M, et al. Measurement
of the thermal diffusivity of dental filling materials
using modified Angström's method. Dent Mater.
2006;22:617-21.
4.
International Organization for Standardization.
Dental materials
—
testing of adhesion to tooth
structure.
ISO/TS
11405,
WHO,
Geneva,
Switzerland; 2003.
5.
Blumer L, Schmidli F, Weiger R, et al. A systematic
approach to standardize artificial aging of resin
composite cements. Dent Mater. 2015;31:855-63.
6.
Kenneth A. Phillips science of dental materials,
twelfth ed. Saunders; 2013.
7.
Lin M, Liu QD, Kim T, Xu F, Bai BF, Lu TJ. A new
method for characterization of thermal properties
of human enamel and dentine: Influence of
microstructure. Infra Phys Tech. 2010;53:457
–
463.
8.
Fenner DN, Robinson PB, Cheung PM. Three-
dimensional finite element analysis of thermal
shock in a premolar with a composite resin MOD
restoration. Med Eng Phys. 1998;20:269-75.
9.
Morresi AL, D'Amario M, Capogreco M, et al.
Thermal cycling for restorative materials: Does a
standardized protocol exist in laboratory testing? A
literature review. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater.
2014;29:295-308.
10.
Lin M, Xu F, Lu TJ, et al. Review of heat transfer in
human tooth--experimental characterization and
mathematical modeling. Dent Mater. 2010b;26:501-
13.
11.
Turkistani A, Sadr A, Shimada Y, et al. Sealing
performance of resin cements before and after
thermal cycling: Evaluation by optical coherence
tomography. Dent Mater. 2014;30:993-1004.
12.
Al-Harbi F, Kaisarly D, Michna A, et al. Cervical
interfacial bonding effectiveness of class II bulk
versus
incremental
fill
resin
composite
restorations. Oper Dent, Jul 7; 2015.
13.
Little PA, Wood DJ, Bubb NL, et al. Thermal
conductivity through various restorative lining
materials. J Dent. 2005;33:585-91.
14.
Versluis A, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL. Thermal
expansion coefficient of dental composites
measured with strain gauges. Dent Mater.
1996;12:290-4.
15.
Casselli DS, Worschech CC, Paulillo LA, et al.
Diametral tensile strength of composite resins
submitted to different activation techniques. Braz
Oral Res. 2006;20:214-8.
16.
Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK, Wang Y.
Thermoanalytical characterization of visible light
cure dental composites. J Oral Rehabil. 1992;19:49-
64.
17.
Chen WC, Ko CL, Wu HY, et al. Thermal cycling
effects on adhesion of resin-bovine enamel
junction among different composite resins. J Mech
Behav Biomed Mater. 2014; 38:105-13.
18.
Kellerhoff RK, Fischer J. In vitro fracture strength
and thermal shock resistance of metal- ceramic
crowns with cast and machined AuTi frameworks.
J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97:209-15.
19.
Lopes MB, Yan Z, Consani S, et al. Evaluation of the
coefficient of thermal expansion of human and
bovine dentin by thermomechanical analysis. Braz
Dent J. 2012;23:3-7.
20.
Nica I, Rusu V, Cimpoeşu N, et al. Thermal and
structural properties of nano- and micro- filled
composites. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi.
2009;113:892-8.
Volume 04 Issue 08-2024
20
American Journal Of Applied Science And Technology
(ISSN
–
2771-2745)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
08
Pages:
11-20
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
21.
Sideridou I, Achilias DS, Kyrikou E. Thermal
expansion characteristics of light-cured dental
resins and resin composites. Biomaterials.
2004;25:3087-97.
22.
Ghulman MA. Effect of cavity configuration (C
factor) on the marginal adaptation of low-
shrinking composite: A comparative ex vivo study.
Int J Den. 2011;159749.
23.
Heintze SD, Zimmerli B. Relevance of in vitro tests
of adhesive and composite dental materials. A
review in 3 parts. Part 3: In vitro tests of adhesive
systems.
Schweiz
Monatsschr
Zahnmed.
2011;121:1024-40. Review.
