American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
7
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue03 2025
PAGE NO.
07-17
10.37547/ajast/Volume05Issue03-02
A Comprehensive Review on Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
for the Surgeons
Abbas Jaafar Khaleel Al-Anbari
Consultant cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq
Noor Abbas Hummadi Fayadh
College of Medicine at Al-Nahrain University, Baghdad, Iraq
Hayder Abdul-Amir Makki Al-Hindy
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, University of Babylon, Iraq, Babylon, Iraq
Ass. Prof., Pediatrician
Cardiac Physiology, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Pharmacy, Babylon, Iraq
Corresponding author:
Ass. Prof., Pediatrician, Cardiac Physiology, Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of
Pharmacy, Babylon, Iraq
Received:
17 December 2024;
Accepted:
19 January 2025;
Published:
02 March 2025
Abstract:
Thoracic outlet syndrome is brought on by a compression of the neurovascular bundle at the thoracic
outlet. Although detection and treatment have improved, difficulties with diagnosis still exist and have an impact
on patient management. This study sought to emphasize the importance of TOS in medical education by conducting
a thorough analysis of its anatomical characteristics. The complicated condition of TOS is brought on by
compression at the thoracic outlet. The neurogenic (n TOS), venous (vTOS), and arterial (a TOS) subtypes of TOS
differ in terms of anatomical features, etiology, categorization, and pathogenesis. We looked at clinical assessment,
diagnostic techniques, and conservative therapies such as physical therapy and injectable therapy. For refractory
instances, surgical procedures such as initial rib resection and scalenectomy were investigated. For a precise
diagnosis and successful treatment, it's essential to understand the complexities of its anatomy and etiology.
Although conservative therapies frequently work well, resistant instances could necessitate surgical intervention.
Positive results are influenced by improvements in surgical methods and minimally invasive procedures. While
continuing research aims to overcome diagnostic issues and customize treatment plans for specific individuals,
improved imaging techniques assist in diagnosis. A thorough understanding of TOS is necessary for medical
education to promote precise diagnosis and top-notch patient care.
Keywords:
Arterial, venous, subclavian vein, neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome, brachial plexus.
Introduction:
Since the 19th century, a variety of
illnesses known as thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) have
been identified. These conditions cause compression of
the neurovascular bundle that leaves the thoracic
outlet. The thoracic outlet is three entries that are
formed by the clavicle meeting the first rib and includes
the lower neck of the div as well as the location to
which some important neurovascular systems pass [1].
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
8
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
The subclavian artery, subclavian vein, the brachial
plexus, are some of these structures. Compression of
this region results in various symptoms, including
discomfort, weakness, paresthesia, weakness in the
upper extremities, and muscle atrophy [2].
Twenty years ago, it was debatable whether such a
sickness even existed, making it difficult to accept it as
a medical diagnostic. However, the illness is now more
widely known, and its symptoms and mechanism are
better understood. As more patients receive successful
therapy, TOS is rising in popularity as a diagnosis in
vascular surgery clinics all around the world. The
medical team is now having trouble diagnosing it
because it is being underreported or possibly going
unnoticed.
Objectives
: The main aim of this research study is to do
a systematic review of the data concerning the
topographical and anatomical aspects of TOS and stress
the scarcity of this topic in contemporary medical
education.
Anatomy and embryology
The thoracic outlet is anatomically defined as the
region between the manubrium of the sternum, first
thoracic vertebra, and first rib. The subclavian vein and
subclavius tendon are situated anteriorly. The scalene
then divides the subclavian vein and artery. To reach
the artery, the middle scalene muscle travels laterally
and posteriorly over the brachial plexus (Figure 1). This
minuscule space is already occupied by the subclavius,
anterior scalene, and prevertebral muscles. With each
breath and every neck, thorax, and arm movement, the
thoracic outlet's volume changes. Cervical ribs or
aberrant first ribs, which have the propensity to be
more cephalad or united with the second rib, may also
affect the size of the thoracic outlet [3]. As the region
continuously contracts and expands, the osseous
structures may press upon the brachial plexus or
subclavian arteries. The simultaneous development of
fibrosis and scarring could result in invasion or
inflammation [4].
Etiology, classification, and pathophysiology
The pathophysiology of the symptoms is classically
used to classify TOS, into subgroups based on venous
(vTOS), neurogenic (n TOS), and arterial (a TOS)
pathologies. These categories can also be attributed to
traumatic, congenital, or functionally acquired factors
individually [5-7]. nTOS accounts for around 4/5th of
instances, making it by far the most prevalent [8]. An
anomalous first rib or the existence of a cervical rib are
two examples of congenital causes. The hallmark
pathology of TOS is brought on by a variety of reasons,
such as trauma, repetitive motions, and anatomical
differences. The most frequent traumatic causes are
falls and whiplash injuries. Functional acquired or
traumatic events frequently occur at high speeds, most
frequently in the context of a car accident. Direct
compression of the nerves or vasculature might result
from hemorrhage, hematoma, or displaced fracture. A
recognized cause is a midshaft clavicular fracture in
particular [9]. Fibrosis can manifest symptoms even
after the first insult. Subjects with a cervical rib are
allegedly more possibly to experience such an outcome
after suffering a whiplash injury, which is known to be
associated with TOS, most often of the neurogenic type
[10].
Figure 1: The three thoracic outlet anatomical spaces
Costoclavicular Space
Scalene Triangle
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
9
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
Epidemiology of thoracic outlet syndrome
The exact frequency of TOS is challenging to determine
due to the wide array of causes and lack of professional
agreement for diagnostic techniques. A frequency of 3-
80/1000 is reported in several papers [11]. Over 80% of
instances of TOS are neurogenic, with venous and
artery etiologies coming in second and third [8].
Historically, TOS has more of a female predominance
and symptoms typically appear between the ages of 20
and 50 [6].
The trunks and cords of the brachial plexus, initiating
from cervical roots C5 to T1, play a role in nTOS. nTOS
might be categorized as true or uncertain. True nTOS is
usually unilateral and primarily affects females
between their teenage years and 60s. On the other
hand, uncertain nTOS often presents as bilateral and
lacks certain objective findings. There are different
types of nTOS based on the involvement of blood
vessels. vTOS, which forms 3-5% of patients, affects the
subclavian and axillary veins. aTOS, seen in 1-2% of
patients, involves the subclavian and axillary arteries. In
contrast, aTOS is typically unilateral and affects both
genders, often appearing in young adults. It is more
common in men and is associated with repetitive upper
limb activity. aTOS is prevalent in younger people and
often affects the dominant arm [6, 8, 12].
Clinical evaluation
True nTOS results from the irritation or compression of
brachial plexus nerves. Manifestations include
paresthesia, pain, and weakness following nerve root
distribution [10]. Pain in the medial side of the arm,
forearm, and hand besides hand weakness and
numbness in the fourth and fifth fingers are symptoms
of lower plexus (C7-T1) compression. Upper plexus (C5-
C7) compression causes cervical, shoulder, chest, and
supraclavicular aching, as well as arm weakness and
paresthesia of digits one to three [13]. Chronic nTOS
can cause muscle weakness and atrophy. Reproducing
symptoms aids diagnosis, often achieved through
specific maneuvers [14]. Disputed nTOS may exhibit
similar symptoms and associated issues such as
headaches. vTOS presented with upper extremity
swelling, pain, and heaviness owing to subclavian vein
compression. Arterial TOS [15] is the rarest but most
serious subtype, associated with pulse weakening,
ischemia, and potential embolization [2]. It's typically
linked to cervical rib presence. Prompt recognition and
treatment are crucial for preventing complications [16].
Diagnostic Evaluation:
By their various compressed architectures, aTOS, vTOS,
and nTOS each have distinctive clinical features [16].
However, it is significant to recognize that when
numerous structures are compressed, there are
frequently overlaps in symptomatology. Furthermore,
even while exploratory tests are often helpful in
validating the assumed diagnosis, negative outcomes
do not exclude TOS [17]. To effectively diagnose TOS
and create a successful treatment strategy, a thorough
history and clinical examination plus a focus on
identifying neurovascular impairment, together with
additional diagnostic testing and imaging, are required.
The history includes details about the start,
progression, location, intensity, nature, and timing of
the presentations, as well as the causes of each
symptom's exacerbation and relief [18]. The
“Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire” and the
“McGill Pain Questionnaire” are two precise
questionnaires used in the evaluation of pain and
debility, which may also offer significant insight into the
symptoms also be useful in gathering patient medical
history [19].
The clinical examination covers a wide range of topics,
including the cervical alignment, posture, and stability
of the shoulder blades [20]. It is typically necessary to
perform additional testing on the muscular, bony, and
neurological structures of the thoracic outlet. Cautious
observation, together with palpation and several
provocative techniques make up the examination
clinically. The neck and thoracic spines, the first rib, in
addition to numerous shoulder girdle joints are all
examined in the thoracic outlet's bony examination.
The scalene muscles, the trapezius, minor and major
pectorals, and accessory musculatures of the shoulder
joints are all evaluated for strength and coordination as
part of the muscular exam. Reflexes and feelings are
tested during neurological tests of patients [21]. In
particular, since vibration sense is soon affected after
compression of the outlet, loss of vibration is strongly
predictive of thoracic outlet syndrome [19].
Provocative tests
One characteristic of TOS is the ability to reproduce
manifestations via certain arm and shoulder
movements. Three standard physical exam techniques
c
an be used to detect TOS The “upper limb tension test
(ULTT)”, the Adson test, and the “elevated arm stress
test (Roo’s test)”. These movements are intended to
replicate sensations of pain, paresthesia, or
pulselessness by targeting particular anatomical
regions that are frequently implicated with TOS. The
costoclavicular gap is made smaller by the EAST, and
subsequent hand grasping may cause paresthesia or
discomfort in cases of neuronal TOS or diminished
radial pulsation in cases of arterial TOS. In the context
of TOS, discomfort or paresthesia can be caused by the
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
10
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
ULTT stressing on the brachial plexus [22]. Adson's test
is applied to determine any compression of the
structural parts of the scalene triangle using a
weakened radial pulse [14]. Provocative tests can
significantly support a TOS diagnosis, even if they have
only a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 53% [21].
This is especially true when performed in conjunction
with imaging techniques.
Imaging modalities and Supplementary Diagnostic
Tests
Although a thorough physical examination and patient
history frequently raise a robust diagnosis of TOS,
scanning is frequently required to approve the TOS
subtype and functional site of anatomical compression
precisely. Plain thoracic radiograms are useful as the
first test in the diagnosis of all three kinds of TOS,
particularly if the clinical presentation is ambiguous
[22]. Bony abnormalities linked to TOS, such as first rib
anomalies, localized bone lesions, cervical ribs, and
congenital deformities, can also be found on chest X-
rays [10, 22]. By offering a more in-depth analysis of the
anatomy, CT scans, and MRI also play crucial
contributions in the diagnosis of TOS subgroups [22].
Imaging modalities are crucial in the context of TOS for
excluding alternative diagnoses like brachial neuritis,
cervical disc disease, and carpal tunnel syndrome.
28 years old female presented with pain and paresthesia of the left little and ring fingers of 6 months duration.
Figure A: CT scan shows left sided cervical rib. Figure B: Supra clavicular incision, identified phrenic nerve at
anterior border of scalenus anterior. Figure C: Yellow arrow = scalenus anterior was cut, pink arrow = tape
around subclavian artery, green arrow = tape around phrenic nerve, white arrow = brachial plexus, blue arrow
= cervical rib. Figure D: Cervical rib had been cut then resected. Figure E: Pink arrow = tape around phrenic
nerve, blue arrow = tape around subclavian artery, white arrow = brachial plexus, and cervical rib totally
A
C
B
E
D
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
11
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
resection had been done
Electromyography, nerve conduction investigations,
and test injections can all be used to diagnose TOS [23].
However, due to the often negative, nonspecific, and
intermittent results, electromyography and nerve
conduction investigations are rarely employed alone
and are frequently used along with other investigative
procedures to exclude various causes of neuropathic
pain [10].
Due to its accessibility, noninvasive nature, and ability
to be employed during dynamic maneuvers, duplex
ultrasonography (DUS) is used to diagnose subclavian
artery aneurysms in patients with vTOS and aTOS [24,
25]. Ultrasonography may be done six months in
symptomless aTOS patients if surgery is not required
for ongoing surveillance. To assess exterior vascular
compression in vTOS cases with negative DUSs,
venography, which is regarded as a cornerstone of the
diagnosis of the condition, may be paired with
intravascular ultrasonography [24]. The American
College of Radiology has determined that MR
angiography, CT scan, and venography are valid
analytical techniques that are appropriate for the
analysis of TOS on a vascular basis [25]. These
techniques can also detect dynamic changes in posture.
Numerous researchers examined and used nerve
conduction studies (NCS) and upper extremity needle
electromyography (EMG) for the diagnostic evaluation
of cases with TOS. In opposition to the traditional view,
nTOS subjects frequently present with abnormal
sensory symptoms showing a weakness of muscle and
decreased amplitude in NCS [26].
Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Management
Conservative Management
The conservative management protocol is often used
as the first line of treatment in a patient who shows no
other signs of vascular compromise, muscle atrophy, or
overall dysfunction and the management entails a
combination of these interventions: rest, education,
activity modification, physical therapy, and NSAIDs
[27]. As a result of the fact that TOS has multiple
factors, specific treatments are selected depending on
the etiology of the patient is. Surgical interventions are
often consid
ered if a patient’s case does not improve
with conservative measures for approximately 4-6
months [28].
The ultimate objective of conservative therapy is to
reduce neurovascular strain to lessen the severity and
frequency of symptoms using noninvasive techniques
[28]. An organized rehabilitation program that includes
physical therapy, Finkelstein’s test, application of heat,
massage, and manipulation, acupuncture, NSAIDs, and
muscle relaxants is effective in 59-88% of TOS patients
in conservative management which is effective for
more than one year. However, the ideal conservative
therapy regimen is still unknown [29]. Several
researches have been conducted to evaluate general
prognostic factors for TOS patients under conservative
management because, as traditions have shown,
conservative treatment is effective in the vast majority
of patients. In addition to disputes on local physical
treatment
adhesion,
postural
and
lifestyle
modifications for long periods, and sedentary work
involving minimal exertion are other facilitative
prognosis factors [16]. The extent and severity of TOS
symptoms, past trauma, and patient weight are typical
poor prognostic indications of conservative therapy
[30]. Interestingly, there has been a correlation
between psychological problems like depression and
subpar individual outcomes of conservative and/or
surgical therapies [30, 31].
It can be concluded that physiotherapy could be helpful
in soothing the pain endured by symptomatic nTOS
patients as long as the individual patients follow all the
recommended treatments to the letter. Special
exercises, which have a direct focus on the
improvement of the facilitative back and shoulder
postural muscle’s strength as well as flexibility are
recommended and the utility of these routines has
proved to be effective in alleviating pain [31].
The advantages of thoracic outlet manipulation
therapy in the context of TOS are still unknown. While
some research has indicated therapeutic gains from
manipulating the thoracic outlet's expansion, other
investigations report symptoms getting worse as a
result of activation of the neurovascular bundle [5, 32].
Alternatively, methods that passively retract and uplift
the shoulder blade, like the use of braces or bandages
that adhere to the div, have shown hopeful
improvements in upper limb function, paresthesia,
pain, and overall quality of life in cases with moderate
to severe manifestations [33]. For patient support,
avoiding painful movements, and maximizing the
physical therapy advantages, ergonomics, and posture
control education is also vital [28, 31, 32].
Besides standard conservative therapy, anterior and
ventral medial spinal cord strokes of mild severity are
treated with intravenous heparin to eliminate
thrombus enlargement and restore the blood flow to
the ischemic areas [2, 34-36]. Unfortunately, such
subtypes entail conservatism and thrombolytic
treatment mostly they do not respond and require
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
12
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
surgical intervention. Moreover, recent surgeons have
also proved that trans-axillary thoracic outlet
decompression is better than simply assigning a patient
to continued conservative management and can be
done to patients who are unresponsive to such
measures [37].
Injection Therapy
Scalene muscles and the scalenus minimums muscle
can compress structures within the scalene triangle.
Botulinum toxin (BTX-A) can decompress muscle by
trigger point injections, anesthetics or steroids can be
helpful for patients who are not receptive to
conservative therapy [38]. BTX-A, which has historically
been employed to treat pain from excessive muscular
contraction, prevents the production of acetylcholine,
which may lessen pain by influencing neuropeptides
such as the substance P and CGRP [39]. Studies with
varying outcomes cast doubt on BTX-A's effectiveness
in the treatment of TOS [39, 40]. However, no
discernible pain relief was found in a randomized trial
[41]. The likelihood of central sensitization increases
with longer TOS duration [16].
Numerous clinical reports cite prolonged symptom
relief in TOS patients through BTX-A intramuscular
injection [38, 40]. Nevertheless, a controlled trial [41]
found no significant improvement in pain or symptoms.
This study's subjects had longer symptom duration
than controls (6 vs. 3 years), heightening the risk of
central sensitization [42]. Unlike other studies [43], a
trial used EMG, not fluoroscopy/ultrasound/CT, for
BTX-A injection guidance. No baseline pain
requirement was set. 90% of successful BTX-A subjects
experienced post-decompression relief [44, 45].
Steroid/local anesthetic injections like bupivacaine,
lidocaine, and triamcinolone, combined with exercises,
also show TOS treatment efficacy [16, 46]. Relief shoots
from muscular, not brachial plexus, blockage.
Surgical Interventions of TOS
Conservative treatment is effective in about 60
–
70% of
nTOS cases, but surgery is occasionally required [22,
47]. If symptoms increase following 4-6 weeks of
conservative therapy, surgery may be considered [24].
Due to structural difficulties producing subclavian
artery problems, refractory vTOS, and aTOS cases
always require surgery [24, 48, 49].
First rib resection and anterior scalenectomy (FRRS)
provide alleviation in more than 50% of cases with
refractory aTOS and nTOS [16, 48]. For TOS, the
transaxillary method is favored since it lowers the risk
of damage and ensures rapid exposure [47, 48, 50]. The
supraclavicular approach is beneficial for aTOS because
it makes it easier to remove ribs and other structures
that affect the subclavian artery.
When treating subclavian artery problems with aTOS,
the supraclavicular approach is beneficial. Resections
performed
surgically
result
in
90%
patient
improvement [50]. Subclavian artery compression,
thrombosis, and embolism are brought on by aTOS,
which is frequently brought on by bone deformities like
fused cervical ribs [51]. The surgical therapy aims to
eliminate the source of compression; initial rib
resection and scalenectomy are controversial [52].
Scalenectomy is less intrusive and provides faster
healing [53]. Damage to the subclavian artery
necessitates graft or bypass surgery for treatment [48,
54]. Embolectomy and blood flow restoration may be
necessary [48].
Antithrombotic therapy and early FRRS with subclavius
tendon dissection are the main therapies for acute
vTOS. Venography determines whether venoplasty is
necessary after treatment [48, 55]. Recent research
raises doubts about thrombolytic therapy's ability to
reduce the requirement for venoplasty [48]. Surgical
decompression, pre-op thrombolysis, and post-op
anticoagulation are required for chronic vTOS. Surgical
surgery may be necessary in cases of intermittent
blockage [56].
Due to inadequate sight, rib resections might cause
neurovascular injury. Robotic endoscopic cameras
improve the visibility of the first rib's neurovascular
bundle, though their impact on outcomes is unclear
[57]. Robot-assisted transthoracic cervical rib
resections provide better wound healing, fewer
neurological problems, and promising scarring [58],
demonstrating the advantages of minimally invasive
techniques.
Prognosis and Follow-Up
As robotic and thoracoscopic-assisted procedures
lessen brachial plexus manipulation, minimally invasive
techniques have more recently produced superior
results in the removal of the first rib [59]. Although
more education, tools, and experience are needed,
they could reduce the global surgical risk.
Invasive decompression has produced actual excellent
results overall. 95% of individuals with nTOS who
underwent surgery reported "excellent" outcomes.
Patency rates for patients with vTOS were higher than
95% in a 5-year follow up research. Major depression
or concomitant diseases that distort the initial
diagnosis are obstacles to successful outcomes [60].
Surgical advancement and future directions
Resection of the first rib by scalenectomy is still the
optimum procedure of decompression, but as
minimally invasive techniques become more popular,
some institutions are now using Video-assisted
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
13
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
thoracoscopic surgery to improve visual clarity during
surgery and potentially reduce damage to the
neurovascular bundle [61]. The endoscopic-assisted
axillary and robotic-assisted procedures are two
additional strategies that have the potential to be
beneficial. The latter aims to lower the risk of
pneumothorax [62].
In terms of our knowledge and approach to TOS, there
has been significant advancement over the last decade
but there are still certain information gaps that need to
be filled. For instance, diagnosis still poses a significant
barrier. For patients with TOS, the advent of a
trustworthy and impartial diagnostic technique like
imaging would mark a new era. One interesting
research direction has been the comparison of TOS
patients with controls using preoperative MRI or CTA.
Post-operative imaging scheduling is also up for
discussion, with different schedules being used across
institutions. For instance, residual post-surgical
inflammation may be present during venograms
performed two weeks after the first rib resection and
scalenectomy; this deserves more research [8].
Complications of TOS
When conservative treatments fail, surgical therapy for
TOS is required. Long-term post-surgical pain to
permanent incapacity are only a few of the
complications associated with surgical operations. The
type of TOS and the operating room visibility both have
an impact on the procedure's outcome [63]. Possible
complications comprise, but are not limited to, the
subsequent issues:
•
Pulmonary embolism
: A pulmonary embolism is a
different consequence that can result from a blood
clot. This happens when a blood clot forms in a blood
vessel and proceeds to obstruct the blood flow in a
pulmonary artery. It might be a potentially fatal
problem [64].
•
Nerve damage
: The discomfort brought on by
neurogenic TOS might cause permanent nerve damage
if left untreated.
•
Blood clots
: Compression of a subclavian vein leads
to vTOS. Blood clots frequently form as a result of this
in the affected veins.
•
Gangrene
: When the blood supply to a section of
tissue is cut off, gangrene develops and the tissue dies.
Infection of the dead tissue has the potential to be
exceedingly damaging and even lethal.
•
Chronic pain
: Usually, this manifests in the arm,
chronic discomfort and persistent swelling, particularly
with venous TOS, may develop.
•
Ischemic ulcers
: Ischemic ulcers could develop when
blood flow is decreased because of aTOS. With aTOS,
these lesions frequently develop on the fingertips [8,
63, 65, 66].
The scar tissue in the operative region, which was
directly related to the surgical approach, was most
likely the origin of the spontaneous recurrence [67].
Technical concerns relating to the primary surgery,
which could have arisen due to a lack of adequate
operation exposure in failed procedures, could have
been real but pseudorecurrences. The differential is
between a resection of a cervical rib with an aberrant
first rib or a resection of the first rib whilst leaving a
cervical rib intact. For example, among the technical
errors mentioned above these errors may lead to
compression of the nerve at the horizontal fibers of the
second scalene muscle, an incomplete first-rib
resection, an ectopic rib, a pectoralis minor tendon
[68], and an adhesive residual scalene muscle [69]. The
position of the patient as well as the surgeon being
comfortable did not require both of them to sit in a
strained position during the supraclavicular approach
therefore decreasing intraoperative iatrogenic injury
[70]. However, compared to the transaxillary technique
the supraclavicular has the benefits that according to
Sanders and Hammond [3] and Hempel et al. [70] other
operations can be performed including neurolysis, neck
exploration, sympathectomy, and anterior and middle
scalenectomy. Additionally, individuals with traumatic
TOS or other non-work-related aetiologies of TOS react
better to TOS surgeries [63].
Better cosmetic outcomes are obtained with the
transaxillary technique [71], but transaxillary surgeries
have a greater rate of postoperative surgical failures
due to an inadequate vision of the surgical region and
compression of the brachial plexus. The proximal
plexus can be reached more easily using the
supraclavicular route, which appears to be the
preferable surgical method [63]. Additionally, it
enables access to the cervical rib's proximal area and
the proximal nerve, which could be squeezed by an
abnormal rib head. Moreover, with the help of this
method, one can identify another remaining aberrant
anatomy, for example, the presence of a fibrous band
arising from the vertebral transverse process. This
procedure creates a window for the supraclavicular fat
that should be used to envelop the plexus after
neurolysis to reduce the chances of the re-emergence
of the syndrome. However, it can be stated that the
supraclavicular approach seems to be the most
commonly used method in most of the TOS surgeries;
hence, further studies are recommended to
accumulate clinical evidence [63]
CONCLUSION
Neurovascular compression at the thoracic outlet is
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
14
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
one aspect of the still-complex and complicated
syndrome known as TOS. Despite previous difficulties
in diagnosis and recognition, improvements in
diagnostic procedures and therapeutic approaches
have been performed as a result of our increasing
understanding of the pathophysiology, etiology, and
anatomical bases of the condition. For a significant
number of cases, conservative approaches
—
including
physical therapy, injectable treatments, and lifestyle
changes
—
offer effective relief. Because of the
development of minimally invasive procedures,
surgical therapies such as scalenectomy and first rib
resection become worthwhile possibilities for cases
that are resistant.
This review emphasizes the value of precise diagnosis
and personalized treatment approaches. The thorough
investigation of TOS anatomy, subtypes, clinical
assessment, and diagnostic techniques benefits clinical
practice and medical education. Even while difficulties
still exist, particularly in diagnosing this complex
disease, ongoing research and improvements in
imaging methods show promise for improving
diagnostic precision. This information is essential for
both identifying the various TOS symptoms and
creating potent therapy strategies.
A deeper grasp of TOS's complexities emerges as
medical knowledge increases, setting the foundation
for better patient outcomes. Medical professionals,
researchers, and educators must keep working
together to better understand the complexity of TOS,
improve diagnosis procedures, and improve treatment
regimens. In the end, this will make it possible for
medical personnel to offer people with TOS improved
care, enhancing their quality of life and lessening the
burden of this condition.
REFERENCES
Laulan J FB, Rodaix C, Jauffret P, Roque laure Y,
Descatha A. T. Thoracic outlet syndrome: definition,
aetiological factors, diagnosis, manage ment and
occupational impact. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:366
–
73.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9278-9.
Mark R. Jones AP, Omar Viswanath, Ivan Urits, Jeremy
B. Green, Julia B. Kendrick, Andrew J. Brunk, Matthew
R. Eng, Vwaire Orhurhu, Elyse M. Cornett, Alan D. Kaye.
Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review of
Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Pain Ther.
2019;8:5
–
18. doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.7951541.
Sanders RJ. Anatomy of the Thoracic Outlet and Related
Structures. Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. 2021.
Connolly MR, Auchincloss HG. Anatomy and
Embryology of the Thoracic Outlet. Thorac Surg Clin.
2021;31:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.09.007.
PubMed PMID: 33220766; PubMed Central PMCID:
PMCPMC8057296.
Chang MC, Kim DH. Essentials of thoracic outlet
syndrome: A narrative review. World J Clin Cases.
2021;9:5804-11.
doi:
10.12998/wjcc.v9.i21.5804.
PubMed PMID: 34368299; PubMed Central PMCID:
PMCPMC8316950.
DiLosa KL, Humphries MD. Epidemiology of thoracic
outlet syndrome. Seminars in Vascular Surgery.
2021;34:65-70.
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.02.008.
Al-Hindy Hayder AM A-MA, Mousa MJ. Association of
dental caries in the era of COVID-19 with the number
of occluded coronary vessels: A non-traditional risk
factor in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma & Acute Care.
2023;3:1-7. doi: 10.5339/jemtac.2023.midc.8.
Freischlag J, Orion K. Understanding thoracic outlet
syndrome. Scientifica (Cairo). 2014;2014:248163. doi:
10.1155/2014/248163. PubMed PMID: 25140278;
PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4129179.
Ferrante MA, Ferrante ND. The thoracic outlet
syndromes: Part 2. The arterial, venous, neurovascular,
and disputed thoracic outlet syndromes. Muscle Nerve.
2017;56:663-73. doi: 10.1002/mus.25535. PubMed
PMID: 28006856.
Sanders RJ HS, Rao NM. . Diagnosis of thoracic outlet
syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46:601
–
4. doi:
10.1016/j.jvs.2007.04.050.
Çıtışlı V, Relief. Assessment of Diagnosis and Treatment
of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome, An Important Reason of
Pain in Upper Extremity, Based on Literature. Journal of
Pain. 2015;2015.
Noor Abbas Hummadi Fayadh AJKA-A, Bassam Maddah
H. Al-Alosi. Brachial artery injury in Al-Emamain Al-
Kadhymain Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq: a single-center
clinical experience. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2023;22:109-
13. doi: 10.36290/kar.2022.033.
Watson LA, Pizzari T, Balster S. Thoracic outlet
syndrome
part
1:
clinical
manifestations,
differentiation and treatment pathways. Man Ther.
2009;14:586-95. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.08.007.
PubMed PMID: 19744876.
Ozoa G, Alves D, Fish DE. Thoracic outlet syndrome.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011;22:473-83, viii-ix.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2011.02.010. PubMed PMID:
21824588.
Lyu T, Liang C, Liu J, Hung P, Zhang J, Campbell B, et al.Li
X. Risk for stillbirth among pregnant individuals with
SARS-CoV-2 infection varied by gestational age. Am J
Obstet
Gynecol.
2023;229:288.e1-.e13.
doi:
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
15
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.022. PubMed PMID: 36858096;
PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC9970919.
Li N, Dierks, Gregor, Vervaeke, Hayley E., Jumonville A,
Kaye AD, Myrcik D, Paladini A, Varrassi G, et al.Urits I.
Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: A Narrative Review. J Clin
Med.
2021;10:962.
PubMed
PMID:
doi:10.3390/jcm10050962.
Atasoy E. Thoracic outlet compression syndrome. The
Orthopedic clinics of North America. 1996;27:265-303.
Gillard J, Pérez-Cousin M, Hachulla É, Remy J, Hurtevent
J-F, Vinckier L, et al.Duquesnoy BJJBS. Diagnosing
thoracic outlet syndrome: contribution of provocative
tests, ultrasonography, electrophysiology, and helical
computed tomography in 48 patients. 2001;68:416-24.
Novak CBM, Susan E, Patterson, G Alexander Evaluation
of patients with thoracic outlet syndrome. The Journal
of hand surgery. 1993;18:292-9.
Walsh MT. Therapist management of thoracic outlet
syndrome. Journal of Hand Therapy. 1994;7:131-44.
Gillard J, Pérez-Cousin, Maryse, Hachulla, Éric, Remy J,
Hurtevent J-F, Vinckier L, Thévenon A, Duquesnoy
BJJBS.
Diagnosing
thoracic
outlet
syndrome:
contribution of provocative tests, ultrasonography,
electrophysiology, and helical computed tomography
in 48 patients. Joint Bone Spine. 2001;68:416-24.
Povlsen S, Povlsen, Bo Diagnosing thoracic outlet
syndrome: current approaches and future directions.
Diagnostics. 2018;8:21.
Illig KA, Donahue, Dean, Duncan, Audra, Freischlag,
Julie, Gelabert, Hugh, Johansen, Kaj et al. Reporting
standards of the Society for Vascular Surgery for
thoracic outlet syndrome: executive summary. Journal
of Vascular Surgery. 2016;64:797-802.
Hussain MA, Aljabri B, Al-Omran M, editors. Vascular
thoracic outlet syndrome. Seminars in Thoracic and
Cardiovascular Surgery; 2016: Elsevier.
Zurkiya O, Ganguli, Suvranu, Kalva, Sanjeeva P, Chung
JH, Shah LM, Majdalany BS, Bykowski J, Carter BW, et
al.Collins JD. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® thoracic
outlet syndrome. Journal of the American College of
Radiology. 2020;17:S323-S34.
Kim SW, Jeong JS, Kim BJ, Choe YH, Yoon YC, Sung DH.
Clinical, electrodiagnostic and imaging features of true
neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: Experience at a
tertiary referral center. Journal of the Neurological
Sciences.
2019;404:115-23.
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2019.07.024.
Vanti C, Natalini L, Romeo A, Tosarelli D, Pillastrini P.
Conservative treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome. A
review of the literature. Eura Medicophys. 2007;43:55-
70. PubMed PMID: 16955064.
Crosby CA, Wehbé, Marwan A. Conservative treatment
for thoracic outlet syndrome. Hand Clinics. 2004;20:43-
9.
Hwang JH, Ku S, Jeong JH. Traditional medicine
treatment for thoracic outlet syndrome: A protocol for
systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Medicine
(Baltimore).
2020;99:e21074.
doi:
10.1097/md.0000000000021074.
PubMed
PMID:
32629739; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7337591.
Luu D, Seto R, Deoraj K. Exercise rehabilitation for
neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome: a scoping review.
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2022;66:43-60. PubMed PMID:
35655698; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC9103635.
Balderman J, Abuirqeba AA, Eichaker L, Pate C, Earley
JA, Bottros MM, et al.Thompson RW. Physical therapy
management, surgical treatment, and patient-reported
outcomes measures in a prospective observational
cohort of patients with neurogenic thoracic outlet
syndrome. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 2019;70:832-
41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.12.027.
Lo C-nC, Bukry SA, Alsuleman S, Simon JV. Systematic
review: The effectiveness of physical treatments on
thoracic outlet syndrome in reducing clinical
symptoms. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal.
2011;29:53-63.
doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hkpj.2011.06.005.
Ortaç EA, Sarpel T, Benlidayı İ C. Effects of Kinesio
Taping on pain, paresthesia, functional status, and
overall health status in patients with symptomatic
thoracic outlet syndrome: A single-blind, randomized,
placebo-controlled study. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc.
2020;54:394-401. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19042.
PubMed PMID: 32442118; PubMed Central PMCID:
PMCPMC7444878.
Ohman JW, Thompson RW. Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
in the Overhead Athlete: Diagnosis and Treatment
Recommendations. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med.
2020;13:457-71. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09643-x.
PubMed PMID: 32514995; PubMed Central PMCID:
PMCPMC7340704.
Fadheel QJ, Naser, Rana Talib, Al-Hindy, Hayder Abdul-
Amir Evaluation of Practice of Prescribing and
Monitoring Anticoagulants Among Hospitalized Iraqi
Patients.
HIV
Nursing.
2022;22:71-6.
doi:
10.31838/hiv22.01.11.
Mohialdeen S, Hummadi Fayadh NA, Khaleel Al-Anbari
AJ, Maddah H. Al-Alosi B. Acute arterial thrombosis in
patients admitted with COVID-19 infection: Clinical
experience. Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma
and
Acute
Care.
2022;2022.
doi:
https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2022.ismc.5.
Goeteyn J, Pesser N, Houterman S, van Sambeek
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
16
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
MRHM, van Nuenen BFL, Teijink JAW. Surgery Versus
Continued Conservative Treatment for Neurogenic
Thoracic Outlet Syndrome: the First Randomised
Clinical Trial (STOPNTOS Trial). Journal of Vascular
Surgery. 2022;76:848. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.07.167.
Kim YW, Yoon SY, Park Y, Chang WH, Lee SC.
Comparison between Steroid Injection and Stretching
Exercise on the Scalene of Patients with Upper
Extremity Paresthesia: Randomized Cross-Over Study.
Yonsei
Med
J.
2016;57:490-5.
doi:
10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.490.
PubMed
PMID:
26847305; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4740545.
Cavallieri F, Galletti, Stefano, Fioravanti, Valentina,
Menozzi, Elisa, Contardi, Sara, Valzania, Franco.
Botulinum Toxin Treatment for Thoracic Outlet
Syndrome Induced by Subclavius Muscle Hypertrophy.
NeuroSci.
2021;2:135-40.
PubMed
PMID:
doi:10.3390/neurosci2020009.
Rahman A, Hamid, Albaraa, Inozemtsev, Konstantin,
Nam, Andrew. Thoracic outlet syndrome treated with
injecting botulinum toxin into middle scalene muscle
and pectoral muscle interfascial planes: a case report.
A A Practice. 2019;12:235-7.
Finlayson HC, O'Connor RJ, Brasher PMA, Travlos A.
Botulinum toxin injection for management of thoracic
outlet syndrome: a double-blind, randomized,
controlled
trial.
Pain.
2011;152:2023-8.
doi:
10.1016/j.pain.2011.04.027. PubMed PMID: 21628084.
Latremoliere A, Woolf, Clifford J Central sensitization:
a generator of pain hypersensitivity by central neural
plasticity. The journal of pain. 2009;10:895-926.
Christo PJ, Christo DK, Carinci AJ, Freischlag JA. Single
CT-guided chemodenervation of the anterior scalene
muscle with botulinum toxin for neurogenic thoracic
outlet syndrome. Pain Med. 2010;11:504-11. doi:
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00814.x. PubMed PMID:
20202146.
Jordan SE, Ahn, Samuel S, Gelabert, Hugh A. Combining
ultrasonography and electromyography for botulinum
chemodenervation treatment of thoracic outlet
syndrome:
comparison
with
fluoroscopy
and
electromyography
guidance.
Pain
Physician.
2007;10:541.
Donahue DM, Godoy, Ivan RB, Gupta, Rajiv, Donahue,
Julie A, Torriani, Martin Sonographically guided
botulinum toxin injections in patients with neurogenic
thoracic outlet syndrome: correlation with surgical
outcomes. Skeletal Radiology. 2020;49:715-22.
Rached R, Hsing, WuT, Rached, Chennyfer Evaluation of
the efficacy of ropivacaine injection in the anterior and
middle scalene muscles guided by ultrasonography in
the treatment of Thoracic Outlet Syndrome. Revista da
Associação Médica Brasileira. 2019;65:982-7.
Stilo F, Montelione, Nunzio, Benedetto, Filippo, Spinelli
D, Vigliotti RC, Spinelli F. Thirty-year experience of
transaxillary resection of first rib for thoracic outlet
syndrome. International Angiology: a Journal of the
International Union of Angiology. 2019;39:82-8.
Brooke BS, Freischlag JA. Contemporary management
of thoracic outlet syndrome. Curr Opin Cardiol.
2010;25:535-40.
doi:
10.1097/HCO.0b013e32833f028e. PubMed PMID:
20838336.
Noor Abbas Hummadi Fayadh AJKA-A, Bassam Maddah
H. Al-Alosi. Brachial artery injury in Al-Emamain Al-
Kadhymain Medical City, Baghdad, Iraq: a single-center
clinical experience. Interv Akut Kardiol. 2023;22:109-13
doi: 10.36290/kar.2022.033.
Karamustafaoglu Y, Yoruk, Y, Tarladacalisir, T,
Kuzucuoglu, M Transaxillary approach for thoracic
outlet syndrome: results of surgery. The Thoracic
Cardiovascular Surgeon. 2011:349-52.
Chang KZ, Likes, Kendall, Davis, Kylie, Demos, Jasmine,
Freischlag, Julie Ann. The significance of cervical ribs in
thoracic outlet syndrome. Journal of Vascular Surgery.
2013;57:771-5.
Likes K, Dapash, Thadeus, Rochlin, Danielle H,
Freischlag, Julie A Remaining or residual first ribs are
the cause of recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome.
Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2014;28:939-45.
Cheng S, Reilly, LM, Nelken, NA, Ellis, WV, Stoney, RJ.
Neurogenic thoracic outlet decompression: rationale
for sparing the first rib. Cardiovascular Surgery.
1995;3:617-23.
Patton GM. Arterial thoracic outlet syndrome. Hand
Clinics. 2004;20:107-11.
Sanders RJ, Hammond, Sharon L. Venous thoracic
outlet syndrome. Hand Clinics. 2004;20:113-8.
Hussain MA, Aljabri B, Al-Omran M. Vascular Thoracic
Outlet Syndrome. Seminars in Thoracic and
Cardiovascular
Surgery.
2016;28:151-7.
doi:
10.1053/j.semtcvs.2015.10.008.
Kocher GJ, Zehnder, Adrian, Lutz, Jon A, Schmidli, Juerg,
Schmid, Ralph A First rib resection for thoracic outlet
syndrome: the robotic approach. World journal of
surgery. 2018;42:3250-5.
Hawks C, Herrera-Nicol, Sarah, Pruzansky, Mark E,
Jenkins III, Arthur L. Minimally invasive resection of
symptomatic cervical rib for treatment of thoracic
outlet syndrome. World Neurosurgery. 2020;139:219-
22.
Burt BM. Thoracic outlet syndrome for thoracic
surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;156:1318-
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
17
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
23.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.096. PubMed
PMID: 29628349.
Jones MR, Prabhakar A, Viswanath O, Urits I, Green JB,
Kendrick JB, et al.Kaye AD. Thoracic Outlet Syndrome:
A Comprehensive Review of Pathophysiology,
Diagnosis, and Treatment. Pain Ther. 2019;8:5-18. doi:
10.1007/s40122-019-0124-2.
PubMed
PMID:
31037504; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6514035.
Hwang J, Min BJ, Jo WM, Shin JS. Video-assisted
thoracoscopic surgery for intrathoracic first rib
resection in thoracic outlet syndrome. J Thorac Dis.
2017;9:2022-8.
doi:
10.21037/jtd.2017.06.122.
PubMed PMID: 28840002; PubMed Central PMCID:
PMCPMC5542955.
Weaver ML, Lum YW. New Diagnostic and Treatment
Modalities for Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome.
Diagnostics
(Basel).
2017;7.
doi:
10.3390/diagnostics7020028.
PubMed
PMID:
28555024; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5489948.
Hosseinian MA, Loron AG, Soleimanifard Y. Evaluation
of Complications after Surgical Treatment of Thoracic
Outlet Syndrome. Journal of Chest Surgery.
2017;50:36-40. doi: 10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.1.36.
Fayadh NAH A-AA, Mohammed LK. . Clinico-
epidemiological profile and short-term outcomes of
patients with metastatic malignant pleural effusion in
Baghdad,
Iraq.
RMJ.
2023;48:531-6.
doi:
10.5455/rmj.20230130063627.
Davidović LB, Koncar IB, Pejkić SD, Kuzmanović IB.
Arterial complications of thoracic outlet syndrome. Am
Surg. 2009;75:235-9. PubMed PMID: 19350860.
Leffert RD. Complications of surgery for thoracic outlet
syndrome.
Hand
Clinics.
2004;20:91-8.
doi:
10.1016/S0749-0712(03)00084-2.
Atasoy E. Recurrent thoracic outlet syndrome. Hand
Clin.
2004;20:99-105.
doi:
10.1016/s0749-
0712(03)00085-4. PubMed PMID: 15005391.
Urschel HC, Jr., Razzuk MA. The failed operation for
thoracic outlet syndrome: the difficulty of diagnosis
and management. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;42:523-8.
doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)60574-7. PubMed PMID:
3778002.
Ambrad-Chalela E, Thomas GI, Johansen KH. Recurrent
neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Am J Surg.
2004;187:505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2003.12.050.
PubMed PMID: 15041500.
Hempel GK, Rusher AH, Jr., Wheeler CG, Hunt DG,
Bukhari HI. Supraclavicular resection of the first rib for
thoracic outlet syndrome. Am J Surg. 1981;141:213-5.
doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90159-8. PubMed PMID:
7457739.
Han S, Yildirim E, Dural K, Ozisik K, Yazkan R, Sakinci U.
Transaxillary approach in thoracic outlet syndrome: the
importance of resection of the first-rib. Eur J
Cardiothorac
Surg.
2003;24:428-33.
doi:
10.1016/s1010-7940(03)00333-6.
PubMed
PMID:
12965316.
