American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
74
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue 03 2025
PAGE NO.
74-77
10.37547/ajast/Volume05Issue03-15
The history of housing construction among the
karakalpaks in the 19th-20th centuries
Eshmuratov Muratbay Saparbaevich
Teacher of the Faculty of Construction of Karakalpak State University, Uzbekistan
Received:
27 January 2025;
Accepted:
26 February 2025;
Published:
28 March 2025
Abstract:
The history of housing construction among the Karakalpaks in the 19th and 20th centuries reflects a
transition from traditional nomadic dwellings to modern urban structures influenced by Russian colonization and
Soviet policies. Initially, Karakalpak housing consisted of portable yurts and mud-
brick houses suited to the region’s
climate and lifestyle. However, with increased contact with neighboring cultures and political changes, construction
methods evolved, incorporating new materials and architectural designs. The Soviet period brought significant
shifts, introducing standardized housing and urban planning while diminishing traditional architectural elements.
Furthermore, environmental and economic factors, such as the Aral Sea crisis and industrialization, shaped housing
development. Despite modernization, efforts to preserve Karakalpak architectural heritage continue. This study
highlights the dynamic interplay between tradition and modernization in Karakalpak housing construction and its
broader socio-cultural implications.
Keywords:
Karakalpak housing, traditional architecture, yurts, mud-brick houses, Russian colonization, Soviet
modernization, urbanization, environmental impact, architectural heritage, housing transformation.
Introduction:
Throughout history, the housing construction of the
Karakalpak people has reflected their way of life,
climatic conditions, and socio-economic development.
In the 19th and 20th centuries, Karakalpak dwellings
underwent significant changes due to external
influences, including Russian colonization, Soviet
modernization,
and
evolving
construction
technologies. This article explores the traditional
architectural features of Karakalpak houses, their
transformation over time, and the factors that
influenced these developments.
To begin with, Karakalpak housing in the 19th century
was largely adapted to the nomadic and semi-nomadic
lifestyle. The most common type of dwelling was the
yurt (or qara uy), a portable, circular tent made of
wooden frames covered with felt. This structure
provided insulation against the harsh winters and heat
resistance during the summer. Additionally, the yurt
was easy to assemble and disassemble, making it
suitable for a society that relied on livestock herding.
However, in areas where the Karakalpaks settled
permanently, they constructed mud-brick (pakhsa)
houses. These structures were built using locally
available materials such as clay, straw, and reeds,
making them sustainable and cost-effective. The walls
were thick, ensuring thermal stability, while the roofs
were often flat or slightly sloped. Furthermore, the
interior space was designed for both living and storage,
with a separate cooking area and a raised sleeping
platform.
The Karakalpaks inherited the yurt from their Turkic
ancestors, as the key features of the collapsible trellis-
walled felt yurt had already been developed before the
Karakalpak tribal confederation emerged in the 15th or
16th centuries in the lower Syr Darya region.
The yurt remained the primary dwelling of Karakalpak
families until the early Soviet era. Its construction
required various craftsmanship skills, making it a
significant part of Karakalpak culture and folklore. The
yurt has many advantages: it is both portable and
durable, easy to assemble and dismantle while
remaining stable and secure. It provides warmth in
harsh winters and stays cool in scorching summers.
Affordable for livestock breeders, it was also suitable
for use by Khans. Over nearly 1,500 years, the design of
the Turkic yurt evolved through a process akin to
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
75
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
natural selection. Each tribal confederation developed
its own distinctive style, incorporating unique features.
As a result, despite living alongside Uzbeks, Qazaqs,
and Turkmens in the Aral region, Karakalpak yurts
remained easily recognizable [1].
Yurts are typically associated with nomadic pastoral
societies, but it is essential to remember that the
Karakalpaks were not nomads. They were traditionally
"semi-settled," meaning that each clan had a
designated wintering ground, qıslaw, and a summering
ground, jazlaw, which were usually located relatively
close to one another. During the winter, yurts were set
up within a windbreak fence for protection, while a
separate fenced enclosure, known as qora, was built to
shelter the cattle. With the arrival of spring, the yurts
were relocated to the summering ground near
cultivated fields, allowing livestock to graze on the
surrounding pasturelands and marshes. Working
bullocks were used for plowing the land.
The villages of individual clans were often situated near
a water channel to which the clan had hereditary rights.
In winter, they relied on agricultural by-products such
as hay, wheat and millet straw, sorghum stems
(ju'weri), and cane for animal feed. In autumn, fodder
was harvested and transported to the wintering ground
using bullock carts or arba. In marshy areas, particularly
in the northern delta, local rushes were also collected
to supplement the livestock's diet.
The Karakalpak yurt bears resemblance to the yurts of
the Turkmen, Uzbek, Qazaq, and Kyrgyz peoples but
features distinct elements, including a uniquely
structured shan'araq (roof wheel). A key distinguishing
trait of the Karakalpak yurt is its cone-shaped roof,
which contrasts with the traditionally dome-shaped
roofs of Qazaq and Turkmen yurts. However, in recent
times, Qazaq yurts manufactured in Karakalpakstan
have also adopted a cone-shaped design. In the 19th
century, some Qazaqs covered their yurt roofs with
animal skins instead of felt [3].
In the past, the lower reaches of the Amu Darya and Syr
Darya rivers were home to a rich and diverse natural
environment. The landscape was shaped by winding
channels, oxbow lakes, and freshwater pools,
surrounded by vast marshes and swamps. These
wetlands were often overgrown with dense reeds and
rushes, some reaching heights of up to 8 meters.
The riverbanks were covered with thick tugay forests,
which gradually transitioned into reed beds, gallery
forests, shrub thickets, sedges, and eventually desert,
where patches of low-quality grazing land could be
found. The forests were dominated by native poplars
and willows, while tamarisk and elaeagnus grew
abundantly in the undergrowth. This dense vegetation
provided a habitat for a wide variety of wildlife,
including birds, waterfowl, mammals, amphibians, and,
during the spring, large numbers of mosquitoes.
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
76
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
In the 20th century a few Karakalpkas erected a yurt
inside their home
maintaining a tradition from the time of ibn Fadlan, one
thousand years earlier
As time went on, Karakalpak housing began to evolve
due to increased contact with neighboring cultures and
Russian influence. In the late 19th century, Russian
colonization introduced new construction materials,
such as bricks and wooden beams, which led to the
gradual shift from traditional mud-brick houses to
more durable structures. Moreover, urbanization
contributed to the establishment of more permanent
settlements, reducing the prevalence of yurts.
Another important factor in housing transformation
was economic change. As agriculture and trade
expanded, families sought to build larger, more
elaborate homes with multiple rooms. These new
designs often included separate guest rooms, storage
spaces, and even enclosed courtyards. Additionally,
windows and doors became more common, improving
ventilation and lighting in homes.
The most profound shift in housing construction
occurred during the Soviet period. In the 1920s and
1930s, collectivization policies aimed at settling
nomadic populations led to the widespread
construction of standardized houses. Consequently,
many Karakalpaks moved into government-built
dwellings, which followed Soviet architectural
principles. These houses were often rectangular, with
gabled roofs and brick or concrete walls.
Furthermore, urban planning became a key focus of
Soviet authorities. New settlements were designed
with straight streets, public squares, and uniform
housing units. As a result, traditional mud-brick houses
declined, and Soviet-style apartment blocks emerged in
cities such as Nukus. Although these modern buildings
provided better infrastructure, they also led to the
gradual loss of traditional architectural elements.
On the other hand, rural areas retained some aspects
of traditional construction. While Soviet policies
encouraged
modernization,
many
Karakalpaks
continued to build using clay bricks and reeds,
incorporating Soviet design elements such as larger
windows and chimneys. Nevertheless, the overall trend
was towards industrial materials and prefabricated
housing units [2].
In addition to political changes, environmental and
economic factors played a crucial role in shaping
Karakalpak housing. The Aral Sea crisis, which
worsened in the mid-20th century, led to drastic
climatic changes, making traditional construction
materials less effective. As desertification increased,
new building techniques were necessary to withstand
extreme temperatures and dust storms.
Economically, state-sponsored housing projects
provided access to modern construction materials, but
they also created economic dependency. Many
Karakalpaks who previously built their homes
independently now relied on government housing
programs. At the same time, urbanization continued,
leading to high-rise apartment buildings that replaced
single-family homes.
Despite modernization, efforts have been made to
preserve Karakalpak architectural heritage. In recent
years, cultural organizations and historians have
emphasized the importance of traditional housing as
part of the region’s identity. Consequently, some
modern homes incorporate elements of traditional
design, such as decorative wood carvings, domed roofs,
and interior layouts that reflect Karakalpak customs.
Moreover, local artisans and architects are working to
revive traditional building techniques using sustainable
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology
77
https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast
American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)
materials. This movement not only helps preserve
cultural heritage but also promotes environmentally
friendly construction methods.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the evolution of Karakalpak housing
construction in the 19th and 20th centuries highlights
the complex interplay between tradition and
modernization. Initially, the Karakalpaks relied on yurts
and mud-brick houses, which were well-adapted to
their nomadic and semi-nomadic lifestyles. However,
with Russian colonization and Soviet influence, housing
gradually transformed, incorporating new materials,
designs, and urban planning strategies. Although Soviet
policies introduced modern infrastructure and
standardized housing, they also led to the decline of
traditional architectural elements. At the same time,
environmental and economic factors, such as the Aral
Sea crisis and urbanization, further influenced housing
development. Nevertheless, efforts to preserve
Karakalpak architectural heritage continue, as local
communities and cultural organizations recognize the
importance of maintaining historical construction
techniques. Ultimately, the history of Karakalpak
housing construction reflects broader social, political,
and economic changes in the region. While
modernization has altered traditional living spaces,
elements of Karakalpak architectural identity remain
visible today. Thus, by studying this transformation, we
gain a deeper understanding of the resilience and
adaptability of the Karakalpak people throughout
history.
REFERENCES
Berdiev Zh.T. Reflections in legends and folk traditions
of the history of the Karakalpaks of the XIII-XVII
centuries. // Abstract of candidate. dissertation, Nukus,
1995.
Esbergenov H.E. Konyrat - tariikhy ham madeniy
estelikleri. Nokis: "Karakalpakstan", 1993.
Zhdanko T.A. Essays on the historical ethnography of
the Karakalpaks. M.-L.: Ed. Academy of Sciences of the
USSR, 1950.
Zhdanko
T.A.
Karakalpaks
of
the
Khorezm
oasis.//TKHAEE. M.: Publishing house of the Academy
of Sciences of the USSR, 1952.t-1.
Zhdanko T.A. Works of the Karakalpak ethnographic
detachment of the Khorezm expedition in 1957.// Field
research of the Khorezm expedition in 1957. M.: Ed. AN
SSSR, 1960. four.
Kamalov S.K. Karakalpaks in the 17th-19th centuries
Tashkent Ed. Fan, 1968.
Kaulbars A. V. Lower Amu-Darya, described according
to his own research in 1873 // ZIRGO. SPb., 1881.t-IX.
Materials on the survey of nomadic and sedentary
indigenous economy and land use in the Amudarya
department of the Syrdarya region, V.I, Tashkent, 1915
