Authors

  • Tojiyeva Nigina Iskandarovna
    Assistant, department of Obstetrics and gynecology #1, Samarkand State Medical University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajbspi/Volume05Issue08-03

Keywords:

Umbilical cord cysts varicose umbilical veins (varix) Pregnancy complications

Abstract

This review systematizes current knowledge about umbilical cord abnormalities (UCAs) — a heterogeneous group of anomalies including length abnormalities, number of vessels, attachments, nodes, cysts, and vascular malformations. Based on the analysis of scientific literature (2000–2024), the epidemiological data are presented: UCAs occur in 15–35% of pregnancies, with single umbilical artery (SUA) — in 0.5–5%, velmen insertion — up to 50% in monochorionic twins, and true nodes — in 0.3–1.2%. The review details complications: fetal growth restriction (FGR), chronic and acute hypoxia, antenatal death, risks during childbirth (vascular rupture in vasa praevia, asphyxia). Particular attention is paid to early diagnostic methods: ultrasound with Doppler (blood flow assessment, EAP), color Doppler mapping (Velmen attachment), 3D/4D ultrasound in STIC mode (nodes, spatial anomalies), CTG monitoring. Differentiated management tactics are substantiated: from dynamic observation at low risk to planned cesarean section for vasa praevia or IUGR. It is emphasized that timely diagnostics and an individualized approach reduce perinatal mortality and improve outcomes.


background image

American Journal Of Biomedical Science & Pharmaceutical Innovation

13

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajbspi

VOLUME

Vol.05 Issue08 2025

PAGE NO.

13-16

DOI

10.37547/ajbspi/Volume05Issue08-03



Rarely Encountered Umbilical Cord Pathologies
(Literature Review)

Tojiyeva Nigina Iskandarovna

Assistant, department of Obstetrics and gynecology #1, Samarkand State Medical University, Uzbekistan

Received:

17 June 2025;

Accepted:

13 July 2025;

Published:

15 August 2025

Abstract:

This review systematizes current knowledge about umbilical cord abnormalities (UCAs)

a

heterogeneous group of anomalies including length abnormalities, number of vessels, attachments, nodes, cysts,
and vascular malformations. Based on the analysis of scientific literature (2000

2024), the epidemiological data

are presented: UCAs occur in 15

35% of pregnancies, with single umbilical artery (SUA)

in 0.5

5%, velmen

insertion

up to 50% in monochorionic twins, and true nodes

in 0.3

1.2%. The review details complications:

fetal growth restriction (FGR), chronic and acute hypoxia, antenatal death, risks during childbirth (vascular rupture
in vasa praevia, asphyxia). Particular attention is paid to early diagnostic methods: ultrasound with Doppler (blood
flow assessment, EAP), color Doppler mapping (Velmen attachment), 3D/4D ultrasound in STIC mode (nodes,
spatial anomalies), CTG monitoring. Differentiated management tactics are substantiated: from dynamic
observation at low risk to planned cesarean section for vasa praevia or IUGR. It is emphasized that timely
diagnostics and an individualized approach reduce perinatal mortality and improve outcomes.

Keywords:

Umbilical cord cysts; varicose umbilical veins (varix); Pregnancy complications; Perinatal outcomes;

Fetal growth restriction (FGR); Cord structure pathology.

Introduction:

In addition to relatively common

anomalies (entanglement, EAP), there are rare
umbilical cord pathologies that pose significant
diagnostic and clinical challenges due to their low
incidence,

insufficient

study,

and

potentially

catastrophic consequences for the fetus. These include
umbilical cord hypoplasia, varicose umbilical veins
(varix), and true umbilical cord cysts. Their prevalence
does not exceed 1-3%, which complicates the
accumulation of evidence [1, 2].

The objective of the review

is to systematize data on

epidemiology,

classification

(ICD-10/ICD-11),

etiopathogenesis, impact on pregnancy and fetus,
diagnostic methods, and principles of patient
management with these rare pathologies based on an
analysis of modern literature (2014-2024).

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed,
MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and eLibrary
databases for the period 2014

2024. Key words: "thin

umbilical cord", "umbilical cord hypoplasia", "umbilical

vein varix", "fetal intra-abdominal umbilical vein varix",
"umbilical

cord

cyst",

"rare

umbilical

cord

abnormalities", "prenatal diagnosis", "pregnancy
outcome", "fetal complications", "ICD-10", "ICD-11".
Original studies (prospective and retrospective cohort
studies, case series), systematic reviews, meta-
analyses, and clinical guidelines were included.
Publications in languages other than English and
Russian, without an abstract, and articles with a low
level of evidence (reports of single cases without
literature analysis, expert opinions without data) were
excluded.

RESULTS

Rare umbilical cord pathologies are characterized by
low prevalence. Hypoplasia of the umbilical cord
(diameter < 8

10 mm in the second trimester or < 5

8

percentile) occurs in less than 1% of pregnancies and is
coded in ICD-10 as O69.8, and in ICD-11 as JA20.2
[1,3,4]. Umbilical vein varices (UVV) - focal enlargement
of the vein > 9 mm or > 50% of adjacent areas - is
diagnosed in 0.4

1.1% of cases (ICD-10: O69.8/Q27.8;

ICD-11: JA20.2/LA8F) [2,5,6]. True umbilical cord cysts


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

14

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

(anechoic formations of embryonic origin) are detected
in 0.1

0.5% of cases (ICD-10: O69.8/Q79.8; ICD-11:

JA20.2/LB11) [7,8]. Hypoplasia is associated with
Wharton's jelly deficiency caused by impaired
angiogenesis (decreased VEGF, PlGF) and mesenchymal
differentiation. Key risk factors: maternal smoking,
thrombophilia, history of IUGR [1,3,4]. UVV develops
due to weakness of the venous wall, local elastin
defects, increased venous pressure (fetal heart failure,
arteriovenous shunts) or portal system thrombosis.

Pathogenesis includes turbulent blood flow →
endothelial damage → risk of thrombosis/rupture

[2,5,6]. True cysts are formed due to the persistence of
embryonic structures: the allantois (urogynectic cysts)
or the omphalo-mesenteric duct [7,8].

Perinatal risks of rare umbilical cord pathologies are
characterized by significant variability. In case of
umbilical cord hypoplasia, there is a 3.5

5-fold increase

in the risk of fetal growth restriction (FGR) (relative risk
[RR] 3.5

5.0), which correlates with chronic hypoxia,

manifested by an increase in the resistance index (RI) in
the umbilical artery by 40% compared to the norm, as
well as an increase in the risk of antenatal fetal death
by 2

3 times [1,3,4]. Varicose umbilical vein (UVV) is

associated with antenatal death in 8

15% of cases,

mainly due to thrombosis, while the risk of intrapartum
rupture of the varicose node reaches 4

7% with fetal

mortality exceeding 90% [2,5,6,13]. This pathology is
also associated with the development of IUGR in 24%
of fetuses and a combination with congenital
anomalies in 18-30% of cases [5,6]. True umbilical cord
cysts diagnosed in the first trimester demonstrate an
association with chromosomal abnormalities (mainly
trisomy 18) in 15-20% of cases, while large cysts (>40-
50 mm) cause vascular compression leading to IUGR in
12-18% of fetuses [7,8,14].

Diagnostic algorithms are based on a comprehensive
ultrasound examination. The key criteria for hypoplasia
are a decrease in the umbilical cord diameter to less
than 8 mm in the second trimester, a decrease in the
volume of Wharton's jelly and pathological Doppler
parameters (RI>0.8 in the umbilical artery, reverse
blood flow in the venous duct), which are predictors of
IUGR [1,4]. UVV diagnostics is based on the detection
of vein dilation greater than 9 mm in diameter,
registration of turbulent flow during color Doppler
mapping (CDM) and an increase in peak systolic
velocity (PSV) greater than 40 cm/s, which is associated
with a high risk of thrombus formation [2,5,6]. True

cysts are identified as anechoic formations without
internal blood flow during CDM, while the use of three-
dimensional ultrasound (3D-ultrasound) allows them to
be differentiated from false cysts due to visualization of
the epithelial lining [7,8]. As additional methods, fetal
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrates high
sensitivity (92%) in assessing portal system thrombosis
in UVV and vascular compression by large cysts (>30
mm) [2,8], and invasive prenatal diagnostics
(karyotyping/chromosomal microarray analysis) is
recommended for UVV and first trimester cysts due to
the frequency of aneuploidies reaching 18% [5,7].

Modern scientific developments (2020

2024) are

aimed at improving prognosis and diagnostics. A
multiparameter risk index for UVV has been developed,
including vein diameter, PSV, and the presence of a
thrombus, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of
0.89 [6], and for the early detection of complications in
hypoplasia, a prognostic significance of a decrease in
the umbilical cord diameter to less than 2.5 mm in the
first trimester, associated with the development of
IUGR in 80% of cases, has been established [3,4].
Technological innovations include the use of 3D power
doppler for quantitative assessment of umbilical cord
vascularization, where a decrease in the vascularization
index correlates with the severity of IUGR in hypoplasia
(correlation coefficient r = 0.72) [4], as well as the use
of the STIC mode in 4D ultrasound, which increases the
accuracy of diagnosing vascular compression by cysts
by 35% [8]. In the field of biomarkers, a promising
direction is the determination of the sFlt-1/PIGF ratio
(>38) in UVV as an indicator of endothelial dysfunction
[6], and the detection of elevated levels of alpha-
fetoprotein (AFP) and beta-subunit of human chorionic

gonadotropin (β

-hCG) in amniotic fluid in cysts

associated with trisomy 18 [7].

Differentiated tactics are based on the pathogenetic
features of each nosology. In case of hypoplasia,
intensive monitoring is required (Dopplerometry 2
times a week, CTG from 28 weeks), and the
development of blood flow disorders requires early
delivery by cesarean section at 34

37 weeks [1,4].

Management of UVV includes planned operative
delivery at 34

36 weeks to prevent thrombosis and

rupture, supplemented by daily CTG monitoring and
weekly Doppler [2,5,6]. For large true cysts (>50 mm),
delivery at 36

38 weeks is recommended if there are

signs of vascular compression or IUGR [7,8].


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

15

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

Table 1

Principles of management

Pathology

Monitoring

Delivery

Hypoplasia

Ultrasound + Doppler/CTG 2 times a week;

hospitalization for IUGR

Planned CS at 34–37 weeks with

impaired blood flow

UVV

Ultrasound + Doppler 2 times a week; CTG daily;

hospitalization

Planned CS at 34–36 weeks (standard)

cysts

> 50

мм

Growth monitoring Doppler (ultrasound 1 time/2

weeks);

CS at 36–38 weeks with vascular

compression

> These approaches are based on cohort studies and
systematic reviews of the last decade, emphasizing the
need for personalized risk management [1

8,14].

CONCLUSION

Rare umbilical cord pathologies (hypoplasia, umbilical
vein varices, true cysts), although occurring in less than
1-3% of cases, are significant causes of perinatal
morbidity and mortality. Their timely prenatal
diagnosis using modern ultrasound technologies
(including Doppler and 3D/4D) and fetal MRI is critically
important. The pathogenesis of many of these
conditions

requires

further

study.

Pregnancy

management should be based on a thorough
assessment of fetal risks using all available diagnostic
tools. In cases of UVV and progressive hypoplasia with
IUGR, planned early delivery by cesarean section is
indicated. Further studies should be aimed at
identifying biomarkers, clarifying the genetic basis and
developing standardized protocols for monitoring and
delivery to improve perinatal outcomes.

REFERENCES

Hasegawa J, et al. Umbilical cord diameter in the
second trimester and pregnancy outcome. J Perinat
Med. 2016;44(7):777-782. doi:10.1515/jpm-2015-
0269.

Sepulveda W, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of
umbilical vein varix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol.
2018;52(6):807-812. doi:10.1002/uog.19000.

Khalil A, et al. Association between first-trimester
umbilical cord diameter and pregnancy complications.
Prenat

Diagn.

2019;39(11):998-1004.

doi:10.1002/pd.5529.

Perez-Cosio C, et al. Thin umbilical cord: a retrospective
cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.
2021;34(20):3309-3314.
doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1683549.

Sinkovskaya E, et al. Umbilical vein varix: prenatal
diagnosis and management. J Ultrasound Med.
2019;38(8):2179-2185. doi:10.1002/jum.14911.

Ghi T, et al. Prognostic value of Doppler assessment in
fetuses with umbilical vein varix: a multicenter study.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(2):227-233.
doi:10.1002/uog.20397.

Prefumo F, et al. The natural history of umbilical cord
cysts: a role for three-dimensional ultrasound? Prenat
Diagn. 2016;36(13):1196-1200. doi:10.1002/pd.4961

Zhou Y, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of
prenatally diagnosed true umbilical cord cysts: a single-
center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med.
2022;35(25):6484-6489.
doi:10.1080/14767058.2021.1914578.

WHO. ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of
Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision.
2019.

WHO. ICD-11: International Classification of Diseases,
11th Revision. 2023. https://icd.who.int/en

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM).
Practice Parameter for the Performance of Detailed
Diagnostic Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations Between
12 Weeks 0 Days and 13 Weeks 6 Days. 2020.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM).
Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org. #46: Diagnosis
and management of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2020;223(3):B2-B14. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.019.

Furuya M, et al. Rupture of an umbilical vein varix
during labor: a case report and literature review. J Med
Case Rep. 2018;12(1):195. doi:10.1186/s13256-018-
1739-3.

Raio L, et al. The clinical significance of prenatally
diagnosed true umbilical cord cysts: a systematic
review.

Prenat

Diagn.

2017;37(8):735-742.

doi:10.1002/pd.5087.


background image

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology

16

https://theusajournals.com/index.php/ajast

American Journal of Applied Science and Technology (ISSN: 2771-2745)

Iskandarovna T. N. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON
RECENT RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF OBSTETRICS AND
GYNECOLOGY //International Journal of Medical
Sciences And Clinical Research.

2024.

Т. 4. –

№. 12.

С. 28

-33.

Iskandarovna T. N. CURRENT TRENDS IN GYNECOLOGY
//International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical
Research.

2024.

Т. 4. –

№. 05. –

С. 91

-96.

Zafarovna B. Z. SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION IN PREGNANCY:
PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS //International Journal of
Medical Sciences And Clinical Research.

2024.

Т. 4.

№. 10. –

С. 30

-34.

References

Hasegawa J, et al. Umbilical cord diameter in the second trimester and pregnancy outcome. J Perinat Med. 2016;44(7):777-782. doi:10.1515/jpm-2015-0269.

Sepulveda W, et al. Prenatal diagnosis and outcome of umbilical vein varix. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;52(6):807-812. doi:10.1002/uog.19000.

Khalil A, et al. Association between first-trimester umbilical cord diameter and pregnancy complications. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(11):998-1004. doi:10.1002/pd.5529.

Perez-Cosio C, et al. Thin umbilical cord: a retrospective cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021;34(20):3309-3314. doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1683549.

Sinkovskaya E, et al. Umbilical vein varix: prenatal diagnosis and management. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(8):2179-2185. doi:10.1002/jum.14911.

Ghi T, et al. Prognostic value of Doppler assessment in fetuses with umbilical vein varix: a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(2):227-233. doi:10.1002/uog.20397.

Prefumo F, et al. The natural history of umbilical cord cysts: a role for three-dimensional ultrasound? Prenat Diagn. 2016;36(13):1196-1200. doi:10.1002/pd.4961

Zhou Y, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of prenatally diagnosed true umbilical cord cysts: a single-center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022;35(25):6484-6489. doi:10.1080/14767058.2021.1914578.

WHO. ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th Revision. 2019.

WHO. ICD-11: International Classification of Diseases, 11th Revision. 2023. https://icd.who.int/en

American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM). Practice Parameter for the Performance of Detailed Diagnostic Obstetric Ultrasound Examinations Between 12 Weeks 0 Days and 13 Weeks 6 Days. 2020.

Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org. #46: Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(3):B2-B14. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.019.

Furuya M, et al. Rupture of an umbilical vein varix during labor: a case report and literature review. J Med Case Rep. 2018;12(1):195. doi:10.1186/s13256-018-1739-3.

Raio L, et al. The clinical significance of prenatally diagnosed true umbilical cord cysts: a systematic review. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(8):735-742. doi:10.1002/pd.5087.

Iskandarovna T. N. REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON RECENT RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY //International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research. – 2024. – Т. 4. – №. 12. – С. 28-33.

Iskandarovna T. N. CURRENT TRENDS IN GYNECOLOGY //International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research. – 2024. – Т. 4. – №. 05. – С. 91-96.

Zafarovna B. Z. SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION IN PREGNANCY: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS //International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research. – 2024. – Т. 4. – №. 10. – С. 30-34.