Authors

  • Kadirova Nilufar Olimovna
    An Independent Researcher Of Tsuull, A Teacher Of State Security Service "Temurbeklar Maktabi " Military-Academic Lyceum, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume03Issue10-10

Keywords:

Critical thinking literary education creative analysis skill

Abstract

Developing students' critical thinking in literature lessons is one of the most pressing issues of today's literary education. On the other hand, in the analysis of a certain literary work, it is necessary to interpret correctly the concept of critical thinking, which forms the ability of the student to have a personal opinion and attitude, and to understand that it is far from expressing only a negative attitude. This article investigates the issue in depth and discusses the application, tasks and results of one of the methods that stimulate the reader's critical thinking within literature classes.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

71


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

71-76

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.

445

)

(2023:

6.

555

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

Developing students' critical thinking in literature lessons is one of the most pressing issues of today's literary

education. On the other hand, in the analysis of a certain literary work, it is necessary to interpret correctly the concept

of critical thinking, which forms the ability of the student to have a personal opinion and attitude, and to understand

that it is far from expressing only a negative attitude. This article investigates the issue in depth and discusses the

application, tasks and results of one of the methods that stimulate the reader's critical thinking within literature

classes.

KEYWORDS

Critical thinking, literary education, creative analysis skill, Eidos-summary, research skill, thinking boundary, aesthetic

taste, association.

INTRODUCTION

Recently, critical thinking has emerged as an important

innovation not only in the world, but also national

literary education as well. Formation and development

of critical, independent thinking and independent

analysis skills of learners was defined as one of the

important goals of national education. Based on the

content of the textbooks of the new generation, the

aim is to teach students to think independently and

Research Article

METHODS OF DEVELOPING STUDENTS' CRITICAL THINKING IN
LITERATURE LESSONS

Submission Date:

October 10, 2023,

Accepted Date:

October 15, 2023,

Published Date:

October 20, 2023

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume03Issue10-10


Kadirova Nilufar Olimovna

An Independent Researcher Of Tsuull, A Teacher Of State Security Service "Temurbeklar Maktabi "
Military-Academic Lyceum, Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajps

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

72


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

71-76

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.

445

)

(2023:

6.

555

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

critically, and on this basis to train people with high

artistic taste for the sake of state and society. Because

a student with critical analysis skills develops an

incentive for independent thought and immunity

against destroying ideas.

LITERATURE REVIEW

At each stage of education, the child's thinking ability

develops according to the mental and intellectual

capabilities of a certain age. In particular, the analysis

of an artistic work carried out in literature classes

ensures that the child acquires his own personal

opinion and attitude.[1] However, currently it is

necessary to treat more carefully the word "criticism",

which is the basis of the content of literary education.

More precisely, "criticism" does not mean condemning

a work or looking for only negative aspects and

denying any opinion, trying to prove that one's views

are correct, but analyzing a specific work at the level of

one's worldview and perception. It is vital to make

students aware of the need to have independent

views.

Kozokboy Yoldoshev, who greatly contributed to the

development of Uzbek literary education, emphasizes

the necessity of paying attention to the essence of the

word criticism. According to him the Arabic word

which means "to select or to sort" and "critical

examination and criticism" (

دقن

naqada) as well as

another word (

ديقنت

tanqidun) which meaning reveals

"to criticize, to blame" and the term derived from it

"critic" (

قنصّد

)munaqqid) cannot clearly and fully

express the essence of this aesthetic phenomenon.

Instead, it is more appropriate to use the word "sin" in

the sense of assessment, which we widely use in our

language and which is used by our Kazakh and Kyrgyz

comrades as well as the term "sinchi" which means the

person of this profession engaged in this work [2].

Literary scholar Zulkhumor Mirzayeva in her article

"Analysis of a work of art: from local to global"

classifies the characteristics of "critical thought" and

"critical thinking" as follows. So, critical thinking is

defined as:

- verifying and refuting previous ideas about a certain

artistic work through the text, creating new ones

based on existing ones or experiences;

- searching for answers to open questions, reviewing

the work of art from the point of view of today's

requirements, modern methods of analysis and

comparing it with old interpretations;

- checking and interpreting information in different

contexts, evaluating the chain of cause and effect in

the work from different angles, making logical

decisions through reasoning, proving one's opinions,

etc [3].

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

73


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

71-76

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.

445

)

(2023:

6.

555

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

In the article, the problem of developing the student's

critical thinking in literature classes today is considered

as an urgent issue and the importance of a correct

approach to this term from a semantic point of view is

noted. In particular, the views of our famous national

Methodist scientists on the concept of critical thinking

were compared. The constructive structure and stages

of critical thinking were analyzed, as well as the

methods of hermeneutic, comparative-historical, and

comparative typological analysis were used.

ANALYSIS AND RESULTS

It is known that the main task of literature classes is to

form the ability of independent thinking in students,

which is necessary for today's ultimate information

age. From the above opinions of the researchers, it is

clear that the teacher must understand the essence of

"criticism" and "critical thinking" of the students

before forming them. Formation of critical thinking in

students mind from the stage of reading a work of art

in literature classes to reading it to the perception of its

artistic meaning and features and requires serious

work and high artistic taste from the student and at the

same time from the teacher. After all, reading the work

is more important than reading it. In the process of

reading and perception the mind leads the creativity.

More precisely, the reader becomes a complete

receiver and master. In fact, to read a work is to

discover it newly for oneself. The reader gets involved

in the events, brings the heroes to life, hears their

words, feels their mental state from the deep heart.[4]

In this case, the artistic text becomes a source of

aesthetic pleasure. Already, if the student does not

have the skills of artistic analysis, the perception of

understanding the essence of the work, he will simply

look at the work and during the process of reading he

will get acquainted with the events of the plot, he will

have information about the fate of the characters, and

if he goes further, know the genre of the work as well

as what issue is risen in the book. In our opinion, mostly

students' lack of deep analysis of a work of art,

following stereotyped opinions, inability to freely

express their independent opinion, lack of inclusion of

topics related to critical thinking in the curriculum are

the reasons for boring literature classes. In addition,

the fact that critical thinking in literature classes is

often not taught as in Western society undermines the

motivation of students to search independently. In

general, there are a number of objective and

subjective, and at the same time complex reasons,

which confirm that the critical opinion of students is

not at the expected level. In our opinion, history

cannot be turned back, not to undo the mistakes made

until now, to promote literary education on a global

scale, to develop a healthy, clean, critical thinking in

students mind, which we have made an object for our

work, to make students constructive, cognitive what

methods and approaches we should use to encourage

them to act, to help them gain a word and a place in

the global community.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

74


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

71-76

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.

445

)

(2023:

6.

555

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

In many cases, the analysis of a work of art is

understood by the reader to retell the work or to

provide information about the text. The teacher

follows the same approach in the analysis of the artistic

text, and understands the analysis as a collection of

information reflecting his views and individual

conclusions about the work. Certainly, this is important

in one way but after the teacher gives his personal

conclusions about the work of art, the students have

no incentive to analyze the work of art in a new way. In

addition, in order to increase the ability of students to

analyze a work of art independently and critically, it is

necessary to activate their previous knowledge, and

this is more important than giving them a brief

summary. In order to bring out the essence of the

events reflected in the work of art, to analyze them

from an artistic and aesthetic point of view, and most

importantly, to actively participate in the processes of

analysis of the work of art, they should activate their

previous knowledge and connect the existing

information to their existing knowledge schemes.

Therefore, the understanding of a work of art begins at

the stage of combining old and new knowledge.

The main features of critical thinking are revealed

through the analysis of a work of art, because the

reading of a work of art requires students to think, and

at the same time, the skill of critical thinking. In the

process of reading a work of art, the circuits in the

human brain move and create certain ideas and

thoughts as a whole. Secondly, when creating new

meanings of the artistic text, different from previous

interpretations, students should remember, restore

and, reflect on their previous knowledge and

experience. In this, they are able to distinguish the

differences between literary fact and opinion, attitude,

understanding of the meanings of the text on the

surface and under the text, the means of image in the

artistic work, understanding the characteristics of

stuttering,

double-mindedness,

the

ability

to

distinguish the characteristics of the author's style, the

tone reflected in the artistic text, to determine the

mood, to provide evidence for it from the text, to find

interconnections between certain realities and actions,

to classify them, to be able to perceive different layers

of meaning, to determine the inferential relationship

from details, to be able to draw logical, fair

conclusions, and most importantly, it is also essential

for them to be able to apply the conclusions and views

obtained from these processes in their work, according

to their vital needs. In the processes of understanding

and comprehension of the literary text, "knowing",

"understanding",

"explanation",

"analysis",

"interpretation",

"synthesis",

"argumentation",

"evaluation", "problem", "solution", "conclusion",

certain steps that encourage thinking, such as "logical

thinking" and "application" are unique to literature

classes. That is why Lazere thinks that Literature is the

only academic discipline capable of covering all fields

[5]. In addition, the language, idea, and characteristics


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

75


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

71-76

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.

445

)

(2023:

6.

555

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

of a specific artistic work are important for students to

understand themselves and the meaning of life step by

step. Because literature is a mirror of life and we have

the right to look at it as a recreated world. In the

process of studying issues such as the plot, logical

development, interaction of characters and characters

in the work, dynamics, and their role in the

development of the plot, they encounter various

views, literary debates, and problems. They are forced

to refer repeatedly to the text and the various factors

and contexts that caused its creation until they arrive

at their own truths in the analysis of the work of art.

One of the ways to encourage students to think

critically is Eidos - synopsis. Eidos-summary helps to

develop an interesting technique for developing

critical thinking through reading and writing, whether

it is a work of poetry or prose, to fully understand it. It

is a method that can be used not only for the effective

analysis of a work of art, but also for the development

of children's creative abilities, improving the quality of

reading and increasing figurative thinking as well as

motivation in literature classes. It is also important that

it can meet all the requirements of the new generation

standard and if it is used correctly, it will develop the

basic competencies of the student.

The word eidos is actually a term related to ancient

philosophy which expresses the meaning of the Greek

model, appearance, image. Synopsis-reader's brief

comments based on the theme and plot of the work.

So, the eidos synopsis is a reflection of the impressions

of the reader-student as a result of being influenced by

the events of the work of art, a visual representation of

the reader's views, the discovery of the work by the

reader, a harmonious example of imagination and

image considerations, a creative-artistic interpretation.

The idea, literary hero, artistic world of the read work

determines the reader's answer as an associative

example.

The

reader

creates

his

personal

interpretations based on his thinking, worldview, life

experience, prior knowledge and mental and

emotional state at the time of reading the work of art.

These interpretations can be expressed not only with

words, but also with images, diagrams, colors, or key

words and sentences that the reader considers

important in the work. This method creates an

opportunity for interaction between the reader and

the author and the work as well.

Using the Eidos-summary method helps to develop the

student's creative potential, which in turn:

-

proper organization of the educational process;

-

formation of research skills;

-

improvement of knowledge control;

-

to increase the quality of students' knowledge and

arouse interest in the studied subject;

-

development of the reader's critical thinking;

-

education of aesthetic taste in literature classes;

-

development of reading competence;


background image

Volume 03 Issue 10-2023

76


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

10

P

AGES

:

71-76

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.

445

)

(2023:

6.

555

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

-

creating expected and unexpected situations in

the lesson.

Eidos synopsis is one of the ways to form a dialogue

between the writer, the artistic text, and the reader

and it reflects the response of the reader affected by

the events of the work.

According to the structure of the Eidos synopsis, it can

be as follows:

1. Figurative pictures, images (perhaps graphics, color

images, figures) that appear associatively in the

reader's mind within the analysis of the literary text;

2. Words and sentences quoted from the work are

visible;

3. In the form of creating a title based on the reader's

interpretation and conclusion.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, it can be said that the eidos synopsis

openly expresses the reader's feelings, experiences,

personal views, emotional state during reading, his

attitude to reality, and his concepts of life created by

the influence of the literary text.

The use of the synopsis-summary method, which

serves to develop the critical thinking of the student-

reader in literature classes, is of great importance in

creating different interpretations among the readers-

students, in making the process take shape in a

controversial form, and in addition, in making the

lesson lively.

Critical thinking is a creative process that helps the

student to develop as a person in the future, to

determine

personal

paths

of

professional

development, to analyze the information received, to

summarize it and to form independent conclusions. It

helps the student not only in cognitive activities, but

also in everyday life as well.

REFERENCES

1.

Husanboyeva Q., Niyozmetova R. Adabiyot

o‘qitish metodikasi.T.: Innovatsiya

-ziyo, 2022.

B.68.

2.

Yo'ldoshev Q. Adabiyot o'qitishni yangilash

metodikasi. O'quv -uslubiy majmua. Toshkent,

2022, B.44

3.

Mirzayeva Z. Badiiy asar tahlili: lokaldan

globalg

a. Global ta’lim va milliy metodika

taraqqiyoti mavzusidagi VII an’anaviy ilmiy

-

amaliy anjuman materiallari. Toshkent, 2023,

B.37

4.

Rasulov А. Таnqid, таlqin, baholash. –

Т.: Fan,

2006.

B. 13.

5.

Lazere, D. Critical Thinking in College English

Studie

s,” ERIC Digest. ED 284275, 1987, p.3.

References

Husanboyeva Q., Niyozmetova R. Adabiyot o‘qitish metodikasi.T.: Innovatsiya-ziyo, 2022.– B.68.

Yo'ldoshev Q. Adabiyot o'qitishni yangilash metodikasi. O'quv -uslubiy majmua. Toshkent, 2022, B.44

Mirzayeva Z. Badiiy asar tahlili: lokaldan globalga. Global ta’lim va milliy metodika taraqqiyoti mavzusidagi VII an’anaviy ilmiy-amaliy anjuman materiallari. Toshkent, 2023, B.37

Rasulov А. Таnqid, таlqin, baholash. – Т.: Fan, 2006. – B. 13.

Lazere, D. Critical Thinking in College English Studies,” ERIC Digest. ED 284275, 1987, p.3.