Volume 03 Issue 06-2023
23
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
06
P
AGES
:
23-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
The paper is devoted to the intriguing realm of paradox in prose, investigating its role as a powerful and captivating
literary device. Paradox, characterized by the simultaneous existence of contradictory elements, challenges readers'
conventional understanding and invites deeper contemplation. Through a comprehensive examination of renowned
literary works and critical analysis, various functions and effects of paradox in prose will be outlined. How paradox
can be employed at different narrative levels, such as character development, plot construction, and thematic
exploration is a truly intriguing issue. By examining key examples from classic and contemporary literature, including
authors such as Fyodor Dostoevsky, Franz Kafka, Shakespeare, Herman Melville etc. the article demonstrates how
paradox enriches storytelling by creating tension, ambiguity, and cognitive dissonance.
KEYWORDS
Fyodor Dostoevsky, Franz Kafka, Shakespeare, Herman Melville etc. the article demonstrates how paradox enriches
storytelling by creating tension, ambiguity, and cognitive dissonance.
INTRODUCTION
In the vast realm of literature, writers have long sought
to captivate readers through thought-provoking
techniques. Among these techniques, the use of
paradox in prose stands as a distinctive and powerful
device that challenges conventional wisdom and
stimulates intellectual inquiry. Paradox, characterized
by the simultaneous coexistence of contradictory
elements, creates a tension that lures readers into a
Research Article
THE USE OF PARADOX IN PROSE: AN EXPLORATION OF
CONTRADICTION AS A LITERARY DEVICE
Submission Date:
June 01, 2023,
Accepted Date:
June 06, 2023,
Published Date:
June 11, 2023
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume03Issue06-05
Durdona Egamnazarova
Associate Professor Kokand University, Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajps
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 03 Issue 06-2023
24
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
06
P
AGES
:
23-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
labyrinth of complexity and invites them to explore the
enigmatic depths of human experience.
Paradox has played a pivotal role in storytelling
throughout literary history. From the ancient Greek
myths to modern works of fiction, paradox has woven
its intricate threads into narratives, leaving an indelible
mark on readers' minds. It disrupts the natural order,
disrupts linear thinking, and plunges readers into a
world where opposites collide and contradictions
harmonize [2,131].
Beyond its narrative significance, paradox also
resonates on a profound psychological level. As
readers encounter paradoxical elements, their minds
are compelled to grapple with conflicting ideas,
leading to a cognitive dissonance that fuels curiosity
and intellectual engagement.
However, while the use of paradox in prose offers a
multitude of creative possibilities, it also poses
challenges for writers. Balancing the fine line between
clarity and ambiguity can be a delicate task. This article
will address these challenges and provide insights into
effective strategies for harnessing the power of
paradox while maintaining coherence and accessibility.
LITERATURE REVIEW
One notable area of research focuses on the narrative
functions of paradox. Scholars have investigated how
authors employ paradox to create tension, ambiguity,
and complexity within their works. Paradoxical
elements serve as catalysts for plot development,
challenging characters to navigate conflicting
circumstances and reconcile contradictory motivations
[2,129]. For instance, in Fyodor Dostoevsky's "Crime
and Punishment," the protagonist, Raskolnikov,
grapples with the paradoxical nature of his crime,
ultimately leading to a transformative journey of self-
discovery. Such research illuminates the role of
paradox in shaping character arcs and plot
progression.
Cognitive theories of literary reception suggest that
paradox triggers a state of cognitive dissonance in
readers, compelling them to actively engage with the
text. This engagement fosters curiosity and intellectual
stimulation, as readers strive to reconcile the
contradictory elements presented before them.
Through this process, paradox expands readers'
cognitive frameworks, challenging established beliefs
and fostering new insights [4,110]. Studies have shown
that encountering paradoxical elements in prose
enhances critical thinking skills, promoting deeper
levels of analysis and interpretation. By exploring the
emotional terrain of paradox, researchers have shed
light on the ways in which it intensifies the reader's
connection to the narrative, facilitating a deeper
immersion in the story's themes and messages.
Philosophical investigations into paradox in prose have
also contributed significantly to the research
Volume 03 Issue 06-2023
25
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
06
P
AGES
:
23-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
landscape. Scholars have examined how paradox
serves as a philosophical tool, challenging traditional
binary thinking and offering new perspectives on
fundamental questions about human existence,
morality, and truth. Paradoxes illuminate the
complexities of the human condition, probing the
inherent contradictions within individuals and
societies. By exploring these philosophical dimensions,
researchers have highlighted the subversive and
transformative potential of paradox in prose [9,43].
While the research on paradox in prose has uncovered
many valuable insights, challenges and questions still
persist. Researchers continue to explore the balance
between clarity and ambiguity in employing paradox,
ensuring that readers are engaged without becoming
overwhelmed
or
alienated.
Additionally,
interdisciplinary approaches that draw upon fields
such as psychology, linguistics, and philosophy are
expanding our understanding of the cognitive and
cultural dimensions of paradox in prose.
Through investigations into narrative functions,
cognitive processes, emotional resonance, and
philosophical implications, scholars have deepened our
appreciation for the artful employment of paradox as
a potent literary device. As research in this area
continues to evolve, it promises to enhance our
understanding of how paradox shapes and transforms
the landscape of prose, inviting readers on a
captivating journey through the enigmatic realm of
contradictions.
Numerous scholars have contributed to the
exploration of paradox in prose, expanding our
understanding of its literary significance and cognitive
implications. Their research has illuminated the ways in
which paradox enriches narratives, engages readers'
minds, and challenges conventional storytelling
conventions. Here, we highlight some notable scholars
whose work has significantly shaped the field of
paradox in prose.
As one of the pioneering figures in paradox studies,
William Empson's book "Seven Types of Ambiguity"
(1930) laid the foundation for analyzing paradoxical
elements in literature. He emphasized the nuanced
interplay
between
conflicting
meanings
and
interpretations, examining how paradox generates
complexity and depth in literary works [15,432].
Cleanth Brooks, a prominent figure of the New
Criticism movement, explored the paradoxical
tensions within poetry and prose. In his influential
book "The Well Wrought Urn" (1947), he examined the
intricate relationship between form and content,
highlighting how paradoxes enhance the unity and
richness of literary texts [5].
A renowned literary theorist, Northrop Frye examined
paradox as a means of subverting traditional literary
conventions. His seminal work "Anatomy of Criticism"
Volume 03 Issue 06-2023
26
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
06
P
AGES
:
23-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
(1957) explored the role of paradox in the structure of
literature, asserting that it disrupts linear thinking and
adds complexity to narratives [13].
Wayne C. Booth's work delved into the ethical
dimensions of paradox in prose. His book "The
Rhetoric of Fiction" (1961) explored the ways in which
paradoxical elements in literature raise moral and
ethical dilemmas, challenging readers' assumptions
and inviting ethical reflections [4].
Known for his contributions to deconstructionist
literary theory, Paul de de Man explored paradox as a
destabilizing force in texts. His seminal essays, such as
"The Rhetoric of Temporality" (1983) and "The
Rhetoric of Blindness" (1983), examined how paradox
disrupts traditional notions of meaning and reveals the
inherent
contradictions
within
language
and
representation [9].
Wolfgang Iser's work focused on the role of paradox in
reader-response theory. In "The Act of Reading"
(1978), he argued that paradoxical elements in
literature stimulate readers' interpretive processes,
engendering active engagement and encouraging
multiple readings and interpretations [16].
J. Hillis Miller's research explored the paradoxical
nature of language and representation in literature. His
book "The Ethics of Reading" (1987) examined how
paradoxes inherent in literary texts challenge readers'
preconceptions and open up new possibilities for
interpretation [20].
Stanley Fish's work on reader-response theory and
interpretive communities delved into the ways in
which paradox shapes readers' understanding and
meaning-making processes. His book "Is There a Text
in This Class?" (1980) examined the role of paradox in
generating interpretive communities and fostering
dynamic, context-dependent readings [11].
These scholars, among others, have enriched the field
of paradox in prose through their seminal works and
critical insights. Their research has provided a solid
foundation for exploring the complexities and
implications of paradox, inviting readers, writers, and
scholars to engage with literature in new and thought-
provoking ways.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To investigate the use of paradox in prose, a multi-
dimensional approach was adopted, incorporating
textual analysis, literary criticism, and theoretical
frameworks. A diverse range of literary works from
different time periods and genres was selected for
analysis. This selection aimed to encompass a wide
spectrum of prose that incorporates paradoxical
elements. Works from renowned authors known for
their adept use of paradox, such as Fyodor Dostoevsky,
Franz Kafka, etc. were included in the study. The
Volume 03 Issue 06-2023
27
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
06
P
AGES
:
23-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
selection process involved a comprehensive review of
literary texts and critical recommendations.
The works of scholars and literary critics who have
extensively written on paradox, such as William
Empson, Cleanth Brooks, and Northrop Frye, were
consulted to inform the analysis. Their theoretical
frameworks and critical perspectives were utilized to
deepen the understanding of paradoxical elements in
the selected texts.
The gathered data from the textual analysis, literary
criticism,
and
theoretical
frameworks
were
synthesized and interpreted to identify overarching
themes and trends related to the use of paradox in
prose. The analysis focused on identifying the narrative
functions of paradox, its cognitive and emotional
effects on readers, and its broader philosophical
implications.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The investigation into the use of paradox in prose
yielded compelling results, shedding light on its
multifaceted nature and its profound impact on
readers. Through in-depth textual analysis, literary
criticism, and theoretical frameworks, the study
uncovered
key
findings
that
enhance
our
understanding of the functions and effects of paradox
in literature.
The analysis revealed that paradox serves various
narrative functions within prose. It functions as a
catalyst for character development, creating internal
conflicts and complex motivations. Characters
grappling with paradoxical situations undergo
transformative journeys, prompting readers to
contemplate the intricate nuances of human nature.
Paradox also plays a pivotal role in plot construction,
introducing tension and unpredictability that captivate
readers and drive the narrative forward. Furthermore,
paradox contributes to thematic exploration, allowing
authors to delve into profound existential questions,
challenge societal norms, and critique established
beliefs.
Encountering paradoxical elements in prose stimulates
readers' cognitive faculties. The study found that
paradox triggers a state of cognitive dissonance,
compelling readers to actively engage with the text.
This engagement fosters curiosity, intellectual
stimulation, and multiple interpretations, enriching the
reading experience. Moreover, paradox elicits a wide
range of emotions, from awe and wonder to irony and
existential angst [19, 200]. It taps into readers'
emotional reservoirs, invoking introspection and
deepening the emotional connection to the narrative.
Paradox challenges binary thinking, exposing the
inherent contradictions within human nature and
societal systems. It serves as a tool for social
commentary, offering new perspectives on complex
Volume 03 Issue 06-2023
28
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
06
P
AGES
:
23-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
moral and ethical dilemmas. Paradoxical statements
and situations confront readers with profound
existential questions, inviting contemplation on the
complexities of the human condition and the nature of
truth and reality [7,353].
Authors often juxtapose contrasting ideas, blur the
boundaries between opposites, and create tension
through paradoxical statements and situations. The
use of paradoxical irony, where the outcome
contradicts expectations, was also identified as a
prevalent technique. These patterns and techniques
highlight the artful craftsmanship of authors in
effectively employing paradox to enhance the depth
and impact of their prose.
Paradox in prose was found to embrace ambiguity,
inviting readers to explore alternative interpretations
and resist simplistic binary conclusions. The study
emphasized that effective use of paradox requires a
delicate balance between clarity and ambiguity. Skillful
authors utilize paradox to challenge readers'
assumptions and encourage critical thinking, while
maintaining coherence and avoiding excessive
confusion.
Analyzing examples of paradox in prose provides
concrete illustrations of how this literary device
functions and enhances the depth of storytelling. The
following examples demonstrate the diverse ways in
which paradox can be employed effectively in
literature, highlighting its narrative, cognitive, and
philosophical implications.
The following paradoxical statement encapsulates the
core themes of Orwell's dystopian novel "1984":
"In a time of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary
act."
By juxtaposing deceit and truth, the paradox
emphasizes the oppressive nature of the totalitarian
regime depicted in the story. It challenges readers to
question the manipulation of information and the
power dynamics within society. The paradox amplifies
the narrative tension and serves as a rallying cry for
resistance against oppressive systems.
Shakespeare's use of paradox in this line encapsulates
the
conflicting
emotions
and
contradictions
experienced by the play's star-crossed lovers:
"O heavy lightness, serious vanity." (Romeo and Juliet)
The juxtaposition of "heavy lightness" and "serious
vanity" captures the paradoxical nature of their love
—
a mixture of intense passion and burdened sorrow.
This paradox highlights the complexity of their
relationship, reinforcing the themes of love's
unpredictability and the tragic consequences of
societal divisions.
Camus captures the existential philosophy of his
protagonist, Meursault in the following extract:
Volume 03 Issue 06-2023
29
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
06
P
AGES
:
23-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
"I opened myself to the gentle indifference of the
world."(Albert Camus, "The Stranger")
In this statement, the paradox of "gentle indifference"
evokes the tension between human longing for
meaning and the apparent indifference of the world.
This paradox serves as a reflection on the absurdity of
existence, challenging traditional notions of purpose
and meaning. It invites readers to contemplate the
paradoxical nature of human existence and the search
for significance in an indifferent universe.
These examples demonstrate the effectiveness of
paradox in prose. Paradox serves as a literary device
that encapsulates complex emotions, conveys
conflicting ideas, and exposes the inherent
contradictions within human existence and societal
structures. It generates narrative tension, prompts
readers' engagement, and stimulates philosophical
reflections. The use of paradox in these examples
showcases its power to enrich the depth, complexity,
and impact of literary works, making them thought-
provoking and enduring.
Let`s analyze some more examples from literature:
"So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back
ceaselessly into the past."( F. Scott Fitzgerald, "The
Great Gatsby")
Fitzgerald's paradoxical line encapsulates the central
themes of the novel, including the pursuit of the
American Dream and the elusive nature of the past.
The paradox of "beating on" against the current while
being "borne back" into the past emphasizes the
characters' futile attempts to escape their pasts and
the inescapable nature of history's influence. This
paradox reveals the tragic consequences of unfulfilled
dreams and the relentless cycle of nostalgia and regret.
"I'm the most terrific liar you ever saw in your life."(
J.D. Salinger, "The Catcher in the Rye" by)
Holden Caulfield, the novel's protagonist, utters this
paradoxical statement. By claiming to be an
exceptional liar, Holden paradoxically asserts his
honesty and authenticity. This paradox underscores
Holden's disillusionment with societal norms and his
desire to rebel against the superficiality and hypocrisy
he perceives in the adult world. It reflects the
complexity of Holden's character and invites readers to
question the authenticity of individuals and society as
a whole.
"I cannot make you understand. I cannot make anyone
understand what is happening inside me. I cannot even
explain
it
to
myself."
(Franz
Kafka,
"The
Metamorphosis")
Kafka's protagonist, Gregor Samsa, expresses this
paradoxical sentiment as he undergoes a surreal
transformation. The paradox highlights the inherent
isolation
and
incomprehensibility
of
Gregor's
experience, emphasizing the limits of communication
Volume 03 Issue 06-2023
30
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
06
P
AGES
:
23-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
and the struggle to articulate profound internal
turmoil. It evokes feelings of alienation and existential
despair, inviting readers to confront the limitations of
language and the existential dilemmas faced by
individuals in an absurd and incomprehensible world.
"Ending is better than mending."(Aldous Huxley,
"Brave New World")
In this paradoxical statement, Huxley presents the
motto of the dystopian society depicted in the novel.
By asserting that "ending is better than mending," the
paradox challenges the traditional values of
preservation and repair. It reflects the society's
emphasis on consumerism, disposability, and the
suppression of individuality. This paradox prompts
readers to question the dehumanizing effects of a
society that prioritizes superficial pleasure over
meaningful connections and personal growth.
As we see, the use of paradox in literature brings about
a range of peculiarities that contribute to its distinctive
and impactful nature. These peculiarities highlight the
complexities and subtleties inherent in employing
paradox as a literary device.
The primary peculiarity of this stylistic tool lies in the
fact that it involves the juxtaposition of seemingly
contradictory elements, concepts, or ideas. It creates
tension and cognitive dissonance by presenting
conflicting perspectives or truths within a single
statement or situation. This juxtaposition draws
attention to the inherent contradictions and
complexities of the human experience, challenging
readers' preconceived notions and inviting deeper
reflection [8,156]. Furthermore, paradox often
introduces ambiguity and multivalence into literary
works. It allows for multiple interpretations and layers
of meaning. Paradoxical statements or situations can
be rich in symbolic significance, open to diverse
readings, and resistant to simplistic explanations. This
ambiguity invites readers to actively engage with the
text, encouraging them to explore alternative
perspectives and embrace the inherent complexities of
the paradox.
One more noteworthy feature of paradox is it
frequently subverts readers' expectations and defies
conventional wisdom by disrupting linear thinking and
challenges established beliefs or assumptions. By
defying
logical
consistency
and
overturning
predictable outcomes, paradox adds intrigue, surprise,
and unpredictability to narratives. This subversion of
expectations captivates readers' attention and
prompts them to reevaluate their own preconceptions
and biases. Paradoxical statements or situations tap
into
readers'
emotional
reservoirs,
triggering
introspection and prompting emotional connections to
the narrative. The emotional resonance of paradox
adds depth and resonance to the reading experience,
enhancing the overall impact of the literary work
[4,110].
Volume 03 Issue 06-2023
31
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
06
P
AGES
:
23-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Paradox in literature invites readers to ponder
existential dilemmas, the nature of truth and reality,
the complexities of human existence, and the
paradoxes inherent in societal structures. By
presenting paradoxical situations or ideas, literature
prompts
readers
to
engage
with
profound
philosophical inquiries, expanding their understanding
of the world and their place within it [14,67].
These peculiarities demonstrate the unique and potent
qualities of paradox in literature. Its ability to juxtapose
contradictions,
engender
ambiguity,
subvert
expectations, stimulate cognition and emotion, and
provoke philosophical reflection makes paradox an
indispensable tool for writers seeking to create
compelling and thought-provoking narratives. By
embracing the peculiarities of paradox, literature
continues to challenge, inspire, and resonate with
readers across time and cultures.
CONCLUSION
Through textual analysis, literary criticism, and
theoretical frameworks, this paper has shed light on
the narrative functions, cognitive and emotional
effects, and philosophical implications of paradox in
literature.
The findings demonstrate that paradox serves as a
powerful literary device that enriches the depth,
complexity, and impact of literary works. It functions
as a catalyst for character development, plot
construction, and thematic exploration, prompting
readers to grapple with the intricacies of human
nature, societal norms, and existential questions.
Paradox engages readers intellectually, evokes a range
of emotions, and challenges binary thinking, inviting
them to critically examine their own beliefs and
perceptions.
Moreover, the peculiarities of using paradox in
literature, including the juxtaposition of contradictory
elements, ambiguity, subversion of expectations,
cognitive engagement, emotional resonance, and
philosophical reflection, contribute to its distinctive
and captivating nature. Paradox captivates readers'
attention, stimulates their intellect, and resonates with
their emotions, forging a profound connection
between the literary work and its audience.
The study of paradox in prose not only deepens our
understanding of literary techniques but also offers
valuable insights into the human condition. Paradox
encourages readers to embrace the complexities of
life, to question established truths, and to explore the
nuances of existence. It invites readers on a
transformative
journey,
challenging
them
to
reevaluate their perspectives and encouraging a more
nuanced and critical engagement with the world.
In conclusion, the use of paradox in prose
demonstrates its enduring power and relevance as a
literary device. It continues to captivate and provoke
Volume 03 Issue 06-2023
32
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
06
P
AGES
:
23-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
readers, compelling them to reflect on the
contradictions and complexities of the human
experience. As writers and readers alike, let us
embrace the artful use of paradox, recognizing its
potential to ignite imagination, provoke thought, and
illuminate the enigmatic depths of literature and life
itself.
REFERENCES
1.
Baldick Chris. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of
Literary Terms // N.Y.: Oxford university press,
2001. - P . 183.
2.
Batanouny G.M. El. Syntactic and Semantic
Classification of Paradox and their Relation to
Reader's Interpretation. // Journal of Literary
Semantics. -Canterbury, 1991. - XX/3. - p. 129-
163.
3.
Bertolet R. What is said: A theory of indirect
speech reports / R.Bertolet. - Dordrecht etc.:
Kluwer, 1990. - 251 p.
4.
Booth W. C. " The Rhetoric of Fiction" and the
Poetics of Fictions //Novel: A Forum on Fiction.
–
Duke University Press, 1968.
–
Т. 1. –
№. 2. –
С.
105-117.
5.
Brooks C. The well wrought urn: Studies in the
structure of poetry.
–
Houghton Mifflin
Harcourt, 1947.
–
№. 11.
6.
Ching M.K. L. A literary and linguistic analysis of
compact
verbal
paradox.
//
Linguistic
perspectives on Literature. - London, 1980. - p.
175-181.
7.
Christ H.I. Irony, paradox and the Zen koan. //
ETC. A Review of General Semantics. 1968 - vol.
25. -
№ 3.
- p. 350-352.
8.
Comorovsky C. Paradoxical microstructures in
the drama of O.Wilde and J.Giraudou //
Synthesis. - Bucarest, 1975. - vol. 2. - p. 155-173.
9.
De Mann P. The rhetoric of temporality.
–
1969.
10.
Dilthey W. The Rise of Hermeneutics // New
LitHistory. Charlottesville, 1972. - V.2. -
№2.
- P
229-243.
11.
Fish S. Is there a text in this class? //Campus
Wars.
–
Routledge, 2021.
–
С. 49
-56.
12.
Forrester M. A. Psychology of Language. A
Critical
Introduction.
-London:
Sage
Publications, 1996. - 216 p.
13.
Frye N. Anatomy of criticism //The Novel: An
Anthology of Criticism and Theory 1900-2000.
–
2005.
–
С. 97.
14.
Grossman M. Dada: Paradox, mystification and
ambiguity in European literature. - New York:
Pegasus Books, 1971. - 192 p.
15.
Hardy B. William Empson and" Seven Types of
Ambiguity" //The Sewanee Review.
–
1982.
–
Т.
90.
–
№. 3. –
С. 430
-439.
16.
Iser W. The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic
response //Journal of Aesthetics and Art
Criticism.
–
1979.
–
Т. 38. –
№. 1.
Volume 03 Issue 06-2023
33
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
06
P
AGES
:
23-33
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
17.
Jakobson R. Linguistics and Poetics. // Style in
Language. - N.7., L.: J.Wiley and Sons, Inc.,
1960. - p. 350-377.
18.
Longman Dictionary of English Language and
Culture. - Longman Group UK Ltd., 1995. - 1528
p.
19.
Lyons J. Semantics / J. Lyons. - London; New
York: Cambridge university press, 1977. - Vol. 1.
- 278 p.
20.
Miller J. H. The ethics of reading //Style.
–
1987.
–
С. 181
-191.
21.
Pearce R. Symmetry/Disruption: A Paradox in
Modern Science and Literature. // One Culture:
Essays in Science and Literature. - Madison,
1987, V III. - p. 164-179.
