Authors

  • Dildor Bakhronovna Bazarova
    Doctor Of Philosophy (Phd) In Philological Sciences, Docent Karshi State University, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume03Issue05-09

Keywords:

Variant linguistic phenomenon weight

Abstract

The article is discussed to the issues of variant compatibility in the Uzbek language, its place in fiction, and its use in poetry.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 05-2023

48


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

05

P

AGES

:

48-51

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.

445

)

(2023:

6.

555

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

ABSTRACT

The article is discussed to the issues of variant compatibility in the Uzbek language, its place in fiction, and its use in

poetry.

KEYWORDS

Variant, linguistic phenomenon, form, weight, spelling dictionary, norm, literary language.

INTRODUCTION

It is known that variantness is one of the important

problems of modern linguistics, and it means the co-

existence of at least two changed forms of a certain

unit in the language that are not related to the change

of its semantic function. Variability as a linguistic

phenomenon indicates the linguistic redundancy

necessary for language, and it is the basis for the

further development of language. The excess of form

is an indicator of the natural state of the language, its

vitality and dynamism.

The progress and development of linguistics, the rapid

change of time, imposes its own requirements on each

variant word. Some of them are taken out of use due

to factors such as belonging to an outdated layer,

speech characteristics, not conforming to the standard

of literary pronunciation, and not meeting the

requirements of the cultural layer. The dominant unity

is characterized by the fact that it corresponds to the

norms of the literary language in all respects, and the

norm selects and legitimizes it. Variant can be seen as

Research Article

ON THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE WORDS

Submission Date:

May 09, 2023,

Accepted Date:

May 14, 2023,

Published Date:

May 19, 2023

Crossref doi:

https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume03Issue05-09


Dildor Bakhronovna Bazarova

Doctor Of Philosophy (Phd) In Philological Sciences, Docent Karshi State University, Uzbekistan

Journal

Website:

https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajps

Copyright:

Original

content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons

attributes

4.0 licence.


background image

Volume 03 Issue 05-2023

49


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

05

P

AGES

:

48-51

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.

445

)

(2023:

6.

555

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

a competition of means of expression. As a result of

this competition, the most convenient and suitable

options for certain communication conditions win, that

is, competition is a natural phenomenon determined

by communicative expediency.

Of course, due to the "sharpness" of its connotative

color, the suppressed variant unit has the ability to

perform a certain emotional-expressive task in the

peripheral areas of speech, which creates conditions

for their "survival" to a certain extent, although it has

a passive application. But this does not indicate that

they have an absolute sign of legitimacy. In general, an

element in a language, whether it is a word, a phrase, a

proverb or any other device, cannot be lost.

Variation of language means within the literary norm

occurs as a result of the entry of more than one dialect

or dialect elements into the literary norm or the

preservation of more than one means of expression in

the language according to the requirements of the

style.

The requirement to reflect the spirit of the time, to give

dialectal or dialectal features, as well as the

requirements

of

artistry,

consisting

of

the

individualization of the speech of the hero in the works

of art, allow the use of such options. In fiction, we

come across different variants of words. We can see

this in the work of poets Iqbal Mirza and Abdulla

Oripov. Some morphological forms also confirm our

opinion in this regard:

mening

manim:

Man saningman, san manim

Soching belga kamarim.

(I.Mirzo “Bu dunyoga kelganim”).

ko‘rar –

ko‘rajak, aytadi –

aytajak, topar-topajak:

Men ko‘rmagan baxtni kimdir ko‘rajak,

Men aytmagan so‘zni aytajak kimdir.

(A.Oripov. “O‘zimni moziyning ...”)

Barakalla,

Qanot bog‘lab uchsa fil agar,

Ikkalamiz topajakmiz bunga ham chora.

(A.Oripov. “Sohibqiron”)

One of the main issues with word options is to choose

one or two of them as the norm of the literary

language. Some researchers say that since it is normal

to have more than two (sometimes dozens) variants of

a word, it is necessary to choose one of them, but they

often base it on their own taste. When choosing one of

the many options, it is necessary to follow certain legal

rules, facts in the language, for example, which options

are used a lot, whether there are similar words in the


background image

Volume 03 Issue 05-2023

50


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

05

P

AGES

:

48-51

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.

445

)

(2023:

6.

555

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

same language . In particular, art harmonizes its own

laws with the norms of literary language in the use of

morphological variant units. Some variants of

morphological forms listed above are distinguished by

the priority of their aesthetic function in artistic

speech.

The emergence of variant units should be considered

as a transitional phenomenon from instability to

stability. On the other hand, stability can turn into

instability, an option can weaken and go out of use.

This can be applied, for example, to the obsolete units

of the variant. Here are some examples:

barhavo

bahavo

baxabar

boxabar

In Uzbek poetry, many units that are part of the

traditional artistic lexicon do not fit into the literary

norms. There are some words that fall outside the

literary norm, but provide a poetic resonance that is

difficult to fit into the generally accepted patterns of

the literary norm.

Some morphological forms also confirm our opinion in

this regard:

suyanaman

suyangum:

Shunchalar kaj erur dunyoi gardun,

Undan diyonatni axtarmoq nechun,

Padar shod o‘z o‘g‘lin bag‘rin etsa xun,

Men kimga suyangum Allohdan boshqa.

(A.Oripov

. “Men kimga suyangum”)

shunday

shundoq:

Men-ku oddiy odam,

Shundoq bo‘lsa ham

Shukr, bas, degancha g‘animlarim bor.

(A.Oripov. “Bobur”)

bo‘ladi–

bo‘lg‘uvsidir:

Rasululloh dedi:

U ham va bu ham

Mahkum bo‘lg‘uvsidir do‘zax to‘riga.

Ikkov ham maydonga tushganlari dam

O‘lim tilaganlar biri biriga.

(A.Oripov. “Do‘zaxiylar”)

The use of these variant forms is determined by the

uniqueness of the creative style of writers. This

method gave each verse a special charm, increased

their spiritual power. The use of these forms is

characterized by the fact that they are subordinated to

the goal of realizing the creator's idea, thought and

purpose, ensuring his vitality and artistic pathos,

achieving poetic elation, increasing poetic solemnity,


background image

Volume 03 Issue 05-2023

51


American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN

2771-2273)

VOLUME

03

ISSUE

05

P

AGES

:

48-51

SJIF

I

MPACT

FACTOR

(2022:

5.

445

)

(2023:

6.

555

)

OCLC

1121105677















































Publisher:

Oscar Publishing Services

Servi

and ensuring the balance of weight in artistic forms-

stanzas.

REFERENCES

1.

Bazarova,

D.

(2022).

VARIABILITY

OF

PHRASEOLOGICAL

UNITS.

Science

and

innovation, 1(B7), 483-486.

2.

Bozorova, D. B. (2015). Some notes of

variability in the Uzbek linguistics. Theoretical

& Applied Science, (4), 135-138.

3.

Usmanova,

M.

(2023).

SIMPLIFICATION

COMPOUND WORDS IN UZBEK LANGUAGE.

Science and innovation, 2(B2), 581-584.

4.

Mohira, U. (2016). Units Completely Simplified

on Morphemic Structure. ANGLISTICUM.

Journal of the Association-Institute for English

Language and American Studies, 3(3), 20-25.

5.

Usmanova, M. (2016). SOME NOTE OF

SIMPLIFICATION OF MORPHEMIC STRUCTURE

OF THE UZBEK LANGUAGE. Theoretical &

Applied Science, (11), 27-31.

6.

Рахматуллаева,

Ш.

З.

(2013).

О

НАЦИОНАЛЬНО

-

КУЛЬТУРНОЙ

ЗНАЧИМОСТИ ФОРМ

ОБРАЗА ДЕЙСТВИЯ В

УЗБЕКСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ. Theoretical & Applied

Science, (6), 139-143.

7.

Рахматуллаева,

Ш.

З.

(2013).

ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯ

ГРАММАТИЧЕСКИХ

ЗНАЧЕНИЙ ФОРМ ОБРАЗА ДЕЙСТВИЯ В

ПИСЬМЕННЫХ ПАМЯТНИКАХ. SCIENCE AND

WORLD, 31.

8.

Рахматуллаева,

Ш.

З.

(2016).

РОЛЬ

ЭТНИЧЕСКИХ

ФАКТОРОВ

РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ

ГРАММАТИЧЕСКИХ

ЗНАЧЕНИЙ

ФОРМ

СПОСОБА ДЕЙСТВИЯ. Журнал научных

публикаций аспирантов и докторантов, (6),

61-63.

References

Bazarova, D. (2022). VARIABILITY OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS. Science and innovation, 1(B7), 483-486.

Bozorova, D. B. (2015). Some notes of variability in the Uzbek linguistics. Theoretical & Applied Science, (4), 135-138.

Usmanova, M. (2023). SIMPLIFICATION COMPOUND WORDS IN UZBEK LANGUAGE. Science and innovation, 2(B2), 581-584.

Mohira, U. (2016). Units Completely Simplified on Morphemic Structure. ANGLISTICUM. Journal of the Association-Institute for English Language and American Studies, 3(3), 20-25.

Usmanova, M. (2016). SOME NOTE OF SIMPLIFICATION OF MORPHEMIC STRUCTURE OF THE UZBEK LANGUAGE. Theoretical & Applied Science, (11), 27-31.

Рахматуллаева, Ш. З. (2013). О НАЦИОНАЛЬНО-КУЛЬТУРНОЙ ЗНАЧИМОСТИ ФОРМ ОБРАЗА ДЕЙСТВИЯ В УЗБЕКСКОМ ЯЗЫКЕ. Theoretical & Applied Science, (6), 139-143.

Рахматуллаева, Ш. З. (2013). ИНТЕРПРЕТАЦИЯ ГРАММАТИЧЕСКИХ ЗНАЧЕНИЙ ФОРМ ОБРАЗА ДЕЙСТВИЯ В ПИСЬМЕННЫХ ПАМЯТНИКАХ. SCIENCE AND WORLD, 31.

Рахматуллаева, Ш. З. (2016). РОЛЬ ЭТНИЧЕСКИХ ФАКТОРОВ РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ ГРАММАТИЧЕСКИХ ЗНАЧЕНИЙ ФОРМ СПОСОБА ДЕЙСТВИЯ. Журнал научных публикаций аспирантов и докторантов, (6), 61-63.