Volume 03 Issue 05-2023
24
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
05
P
AGES
:
24-28
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
As the social network becomes popular, the amount of conflicting text is expanding. The increase in the number of
provocative messages affecting the security of the Republic of Uzbekistan, inciting national-ethnic conflicts,
promoting war and extremism, creates the need to examine these types of texts. In the process of expertise, it is
necessary to determine the limits of the powers of the linguist-expert. The article covers the issues of distinguishing
and justifying the linguistic and legal components of the issue in the linguistic expertise carried out on political texts.
KEYWORDS
Political text, invitation, provocation, manipulation, expertise, analysis stage, expert, linguocriminological research.
INTRODUCTION
Social media posts, wide-ranging debates between
them, and increased tensions have side tracked the
task of legal regulation. The unique aspect of messages
transmitted through social networks is that it has a
wide scope and high impact. Blog, post, video, audio
messages transmitted through social networks spread
quickly and cause various negative emotions in
network users. The danger of social network messages
is that they become known to the whole world, attract
the attention of many network users, and have high
influence.
Research Article
THE ISSUE OF LINGUISTIC AND LEGAL COMPONENTS IN THE
EXAMINATION OF POLITICAL MESSAGES IN SOCIAL NETWORKS
Submission Date:
May 07, 2023,
Accepted Date:
May 12, 2023,
Published Date:
May 17, 2023
Crossref doi:
https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume03Issue05-05
Solieva Nargisa
Researcher of Alisher Navoi Tashkent State University of Uzbek Art and Literature, Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajps
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 03 Issue 05-2023
25
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
05
P
AGES
:
24-28
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
MAIN PART
Criminal prosecutions for inciting hatred or enmity,
public calls for extremist activities, all this has led to the
emergence of forensic activities such as forensic
linguistics. The main object of such examination is the
result of speech activity - speech work in the form of an
oral statement or a written text. [1, 70].
E. I. Galyashina noted that practice in cases where the
spoken or written word is the subject of a dispute
shows that this linguistic expertise can be of invaluable
help both in preventing and suppressing the
manifestation of verbal extremism, which helps to
determine the facts. [3, 175]. However, to fully use the
possibilities of the science of linguistics, it is necessary
to distinguish the issues of legal qualification of the
speech conflict from the issues that require special
knowledge in the field of linguistics. In the legislation
of the Republic of Uzbekistan, extremism (extremist
activity) refers to many phenomena described by the
list of actions specified in the law:
1.
Violently changing the fundamentals of the
constitutional system and violating the integrity of the
Republic of Uzbekistan.
2.
Mass justification of terrorism and other
terrorist activities.
3.
Inciting social, racial, national, or religious
discord.
4.
promoting the uniqueness, superiority or
inferiority of a person based on his social, racial,
national, religious, or linguistic affiliation or attitude to
religion.
5.
promotion and public display of signs or
symbols similar to fascism, missionary, terrorist
attributes or symbols to the point of confusion.
6.
public calls to carry out these actions or to
publicly disseminate extremist materials, as well as to
produce or store them for the purpose of mass
dissemination.
To achieve the goal of any linguistic expertise, the
linguist-expert must solve certain research problems
related to solving the problem of identity. For example,
if the expert is asked "Are there hidden signs of
provocation in the text?" then the linguist should be
able to identify the hidden signs of the text using text
analysis. This identification can be made on
extralinguistic grounds.
Figure 1. Post from Facebook
Volume 03 Issue 05-2023
26
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
05
P
AGES
:
24-28
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ANALYSIS OF METHODS
Specificity at the level of the intended content and the
possible consequences of the speech work include all
the problems of determining the true intentions of the
speaker or the true reactions of the listener (Did the
speaker intend to incite interethnic hostility? Did the
author of the speech intentionally spread negative
content? Does the author of the speech call for
usurpation of power? Does it have a negative effect on
the listener?). Solving such problems is beyond the
authority of a linguist-expert. It is worth mentioning
that the question of determining the competences of a
linguist-expert is very important in expertise. It is
necessary to distinguish between legal and linguistic
aspects of the issue. Legal and linguistic aspects can be
distinguished as follows when examining a text with a
political content copied from the following social
network: Translation:
All government officials must be sent to outside naked,
Prime Minister and President too.
God damn them.
Dead nation without language,
If you keep silencing, they will charge you even for
fuc@ing you.
The analysis of linguistic and legal aspects of the post
of this social network is provided in the table below:
PART OF LINGUISTIC COMPONENT
PART OF LEGAL COMPONENT
Does the text contain a unit with an
insulting theme?
The person was/was not insulted
Volume 03 Issue 05-2023
27
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
05
P
AGES
:
24-28
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
What is the semantic content of the
text?
The person does not intend to
incite/incite enmity
What is the pragmatic content of the
text?
There is/is no call for separatism
What is the stylistic nature of the text?
Does not have a negative effect on
another person
Does the text contain the content of
provocation?
Written by a socially dangerous person
Is the text defamatory?
High/medium/safe social risk
Does the text contain negative content?
The attitude towards the person is
stated intentionally
Does the text contain threats and
invitations directed at a single person?
It did/did not intend to stir up political
controversy
Semantic content of lexical units used in
the text?
There is/is no call for a coup d'état
What is the pragmatic function of the
punctuation marks used in the text?
There is/is no violation of the
constitutional system
What is the semantic content of
phraseological units used in the text?
He deliberately posted the text on a
social network.
Table 1. Identify linguistic and legal components.
CONCLUSION
Of course, these aspects do not fully reflect the
linguistic and legal component. Therefore, according
to the type of text, the powers and duties of the expert
and the investigator change. In the implementation of
judicial linguistic expertise of political science, the main
trend in the world is focused on the analysis of the
political nature of the text. Also, forensic, and political
science expertise is researched separately from
linguistic expertise.
REFERENCES
There are no sources in the current document.
Volume 03 Issue 05-2023
28
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
03
ISSUE
05
P
AGES
:
24-28
SJIF
I
MPACT
FACTOR
(2022:
5.
445
)
(2023:
6.
555
)
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
1.
Афиногенов Д. Общественная политическая
экспертиза.
-
СПб., 2009.; Борисов Л.
П.
Политология, Учебное пособие
-
М., 2008;
2.
Венгеров Л.Б. Синергетика и политика. М., 2008;
Гаджиев К.С., Политическая наука. М, 2009;
Котовец В.А. Общественная экспертиза в сфере
государственного управления // Государство и
общество, 2005; Пляйс Я.А.
Политическая наука
в современной России: новые вызовы нового
времени. // Политическая наука на Юге России:
итоги двадцатилетнего развития. Сборник
материалов
международной
научно
-
практической конференции 11
-
12 марта 2009 г.
Вып. 1.
-
Ростов н/Д.: Изд
-
во СКАГС, 2009.
3.
Галяшина Е.И. Назначение, производство и
оценка заключения судебной лингвистической
экспертизы. –
М., 2002 –
151с.
4.
Musulmonova K. Lingvistik ekspertiza tahlil
bosqichlari mazmuni//Жамият ва инновaциялар
-
Общество и инновaция
- Society and innovations.
T.: 2021.
5.
Баранов А.Н. Лингвистическая экспертиза
текста: теория и практика: учеб. пособие [Текст].
М.: Флинта: Наука, 2011.С 51
-56
