Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
141
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
141-146
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
ABSTRACT
The choice of anthropocentric linguistics as a scientific paradigm is due to the inclusion of the studied problems in the
study of the semiosphere of the inner world of man, which is one of the priorities of modern research. In modern
linguistics, it becomes relevant to understand and describe the linguistic ontology of the concept of “loyalty” to the
fullest extent possible, to identify and form the conceptual properties of the concept, to characterize its objective
structure as a moral concept.
KEYWORDS
Anthropocentric paradigm, cognitive linguistics, linguoculturology, concept, loyalty, loyalty, betrayal.
INTRODUCTION
The semantics of the human inner world, objectified as
general generalized and collectively meaningful
meanings, are constructed by a number of universal
semantic discrete constants whose totality constitutes
a particular semiosphere. These constants always have
a point of view of meaning, affect the thinking,
consciousness, psyche, linguistic attributes of a
person. Their semantics is determined by a social and
psychophysiological organization, a person is formed
in a certain semiotic space in the process of
socialization of a person and cannot be inherited at
birth, an important place in the semiosphere of the
human inner world is occupied by his moral World:
Duty, faith, conscience, etc.
Research Article
CONCEPT OF "DEVOTION": SEMANTIC, COGNITIVE, LINGUOCULTURAL
APPROACH
Submission Date:
October 12, 2024,
Accepted Date:
October 17, 2024,
Published Date:
October 22, 2024
Crossref doi
https://doi.org/10.37547/ajps/Volume04Issue10-22
Gulbahor Nuriddinovna ABDULLAEVA
Doctoral student, Navoi State Pedagogical Institute, Uzbekistan
Journal
Website:
https://theusajournals.
com/index.php/ajps
Copyright:
Original
content from this work
may be used under the
terms of the creative
commons
attributes
4.0 licence.
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
142
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
141-146
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Literature review.
The phenomena of moral and ethical conception have
been researched in various plans by philosophers, who
are often the subject of Cognitive Research in
linguistics, and in natural language their nomination
and performance characteristics are analyzed in detail
scientifically. The interest of modern cognitive
scientists in moral concepts is associated with their
ethnolinguistic nature, the content of which is
determined by the norms of society, they present
knowledge about the inner world of a person. Behind
them is an idealized world, an existing situation in the
world, an incompatible idea.
Moral concepts are a category that reflect moral
relationships and create morality as one of the forms
of social consciousness. They fulfill a function that
regulates the behavior of each person for the benefit
of everyone, which is the paradox of their nature: they
develop from the restriction of individual needs, which
serves as an obstacle to their satisfaction.
No one denies the objectivity of moral concepts and
their existence in collective consciousness. It is
impossible to doubt the correctness of their dictionary
interpretation. However, it is somewhat difficult for
native speakers to give a clear definition of them, since
the essence of lexemes that indicate moral (existence,
social, etc.) concepts is very abstract, and verbal
expression is somewhat complex. "The complexity of
analyzing and understanding the essence of this type
of concept is due to the lack of visible physical support
in the material world, in addition to the sound form of
the word”.
The concepts of moral and ethical concept are
abstract, and are subjective as opposed to specific
noun concepts, which are more collective. They are not
tied to a constant mental image; they do not have
alternative associations, the essence of which can be
arranged in the form of a diagram or in the form of a
script, a frame.
The names of moral concepts are concepts that exist in
the individual mind at an uncertain, undetectable
intensity. "Moral concepts highlighted in the class of
social concepts (”honor“,” duty“,” interest“,”
absurdity”, etc.) are the main concepts that form the
basis of language and World Pictures," m
admits.V.Pimenova.
Ethical concepts require certain conditions for their
formation as socio-assessment concepts that regulate
the interaction of a person with others:
1) the presence of a system of traditional rules-moral,
aesthetic, etiquette;
2) assessment of the appearance of behavior in
relation to this system of norms by others;
3) the attitude of moral concepts to the assessment of
another.
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
143
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
141-146
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
RESULTS
In this case, there is an opportunity to change these
conditions. Thus, the system of rules can be external
and internal to a person, embedded in his
consciousness, corporate or universal, enshrined in
tradition or law, given by natural or divine revelation.
Such concepts are involved in the mechanisms of
coordination of the mind as a certain div, the
purpose of which is manifested in sentencing and as an
effective principle of man. Some of them are a
reflection of the forms of external regulation of
behavior that exists in society (e.g., "honor",”
reputation"), while others are self-control or internal
regulation of behavior ("guilt",”conscience").
Moral concepts, such as “conscience”, “honor”, as
well as the concept of “Fidelity”, which is subject to
analysis, begin with a “scenario” series of specific facts
of human activity, actions, feelings and experiences,
understanding interpersonal interactions. These
subjects are assessed by nature on the principle of”
plus “ –
” minus", always used in the context of certain
emotional feelings. The epistemiological subject
studies them not through dictionary definitions, but as
a result of personal social experience, as well as the
experience of previous generations, the traditions of
the society to which it belongs.
The ability to understand” good “and”bad " is formed
in native speakers as a result of an assessment of their
actions, behavior, principles, spiritual ideals of other
people, teaches to recognize “positive” and
“negative” concepts from the point of view of
morality.
Concepts
of
“shame”
(Arutyunova
2000),
“conscience” (Arutyunova 2000, Uris
on 2000,
Kondratyeva 2006), “chastity” (Yakovleva 2000),
“virtue” (Slepneva 2006), “crime” (Yevtushok 2004),
“punishment” (Kontrimovich 2004); “sin” (Panova
2000), “duty special linguistic research has been
carried out on concepts such as (Koshelev 2000),”
conscience “egocentric orientation categories (chijova
2005);” good “and” bad “(Pashayeva 2004), linguistic
renewal of moral speech (Oshkina 2006.
The universal meanings of fidelity and betrayal studied
in studies are related to the concept of truth and
falsehood. “Truth” (Bolinger 1987, Arutyunova 1991,
Shatunovsky 1991, Toporova 1995, Yanko 1995,
Khromova 2002, Nikitina 2003), “sincerity / insincerity”
(Plotnikova 2000), “lies” (Panchenko 1999, Tokareva
2001), “lies” (Weinrich 1987, Morozova 2005, Bask
ett
1974, concepts such as Zuckerman 1985, Sweetser
1987, etc.
It has been observed that the concept of” fidelity " is a
means of entering the concept and a linguistic
description of units that objectify certain meanings
identified in the human mind. Based on the integrated
integrative approach, there is an opportunity to study
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
144
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
141-146
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
the concept of “fidelity” from different points of view.
Fidelity is the property of a person associated with
support, honesty and integrity. These qualities are
formed throughout life, form the basis of the
personality and become its value potential. Fidelity is
the foundation on which a person rests. Being faithful
to yourself is trusting yourself and your strength, not
betraying your ideals and values. Fidelity to the family
is the act of not betraying the values of your ancestors,
keeping traditions, remembering the past. Being
faithful to your beloved means appreciating and
respecting your partner, treating the feelings of the
person you trust with caution. If a person does not
show such a quality as Fidelity, then it is difficult to call
it holistic. The character-characteristics of each person
are varietal, therefore, each person can have different
boundaries and norms of the concept of “fidelity”, but
its value, undoubtedly, has high positions on all fronts.
These categories are a kind of interpersonal category
developed by mankind in many millennia of its
existence.
Explanatory dictionaries note their most common
characteristics when distracting from their subjective
figurative and emotional characteristics: endurance
and immutability in fidelity, in relationships, in the
performance of tasks, in duty; ...property of truth;
complete loyalty, truthfulness, perseverance in words,
perseverance
in
work;
reliability,
accuracy,
serviceability, truth.
Judgments about the world contain not only
information about the objects contained in it, but also
thoughts about them. Accordingly, the truth is not in
itself, but the attitude to this fact in the form of a value
judgment. In other words, what surrounds a person is
inherent not only in ontological properties, but also in
value properties: useful and harmful, beautiful and
ugly, good and bad, etc. “The phenomenon of value is
a complex-holistic, multidimensional formation, which
cannot be reduced to any aspect of it, one or another
specific manifestation, the multilateral integrity of
which can only be modeled by philosophy.” Noting
that the focus of the interests of most researchers is on
a person, his feelings, qualities, they make up the
semiosphere of the human inner world as a whole.
Dictionary definitions of the deotion concept are
detailed in lexicographic sources of representatives of
concepts (WNCD 1973; LDCE 1978; OALDCE 1982;
WEUDEL 1989; CCELD 1991; ANED 1992; ALDCE 1996;
CDAE 2000; LDCE 2001; COED 2002; OWD 2003). The
information provided in these sources suggests that
the verbalization of the concept of “fidelity” in English
-
language consciousness corresponds to the true
SEMAS of Fidelity, Fidelity, action, adhesion,
attachment, patience, true SEMAS.
The concept of "betrayal" represents the sememas of
the faithless, the faithless, the unfaithful, the traitor,
the traitor, the false, the false, the unrighteous, the
adulterous, the false. The nominations of fidelity and
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
145
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
141-146
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
betrayal reveal a significant variability in their
conceptualization methods, since they are presented
in the main parts of speech. Loyalty, for example,
includes partial forms such as loyalty; betrayal has a
number of derivatives such as treason, treason, such as
Fidelity, formed from the lexeme of loyalty; lies differ
in semantic parameters with a false heart, for example,
the general nomination of betrayal
‒
betrayal, and
betrayal
‒
betrayal of the Motherland, its interests, etc.
Linguistic signs such as Dionate, Fidelity, Fidelity,
infidelity, betrayal, often interpreted through each
other, refer to the level of basic expression of the
concepts of “fidelity” and “betrayal”. The analysis of
lexeme dictionary definitions allows you to identify the
keywords of objectifying concepts: fidelity and
betrayal. This choice of nuclear units is explained by the
fact that Fidelity and betrayal are substantive
predicates that are stylistically neutral and reflect the
most conceptual characteristics of the concepts under
study. However, in contrast to concepts where
adjectival and verbal form predicates of fidelity and
infidelity are frequent in dictionaries and substantive
predicates are manifested, the abundance of
dictionary interpretations is conspicuous. As noted in
the special literature, adjectival and verbal predicates,
with the help of meanings, each lexeme is
individualized in a separate vocabulary, emphasizing
certain facets of them. This also often corresponds to
the essence of the predicates of fidelity and betrayal,
which represent the concepts under study.
Analysis of lexical interpretations of qualitative and
verbal predicates reveals conceptual signs of fidelity
and betrayal. Based on the study of materials from
lexicographic sources, the following signs of the
concept of fidelity were identified:
1) conceptual sign
‒
patience, stability in feelings,
dependence; maintaining faith; stable, faithful in
loyalty or affection; full of faith, believing; remaining
faithful and persistent. For example, not a faithful
friend; did not remain faithful to a friend.
2) attribute sign
‒
expressed by definitions of
permanence in adherence to the ideals of any religious
faith, in support of any idea, faith, party or group:
strong faith in religion; true believers; someone loyal to
a person, organization or idea; the div of faithful
members of any group.
3) A Conceptual feature
‒
the persistence in fulfilling
promises and fulfilling duty is emphasized on the basis
of the following definitions: strict or thorough in
fulfilling duty; loyalty to one's own word, promises,
etc.
Analysis of synonymous instruments objectifying the
studied concepts revealed their new, additional
features: “support”, “protection”, “sincerity”, “rigor
in moral principles”, “enthusiasm”
-there are signs of
the concept “Fidelity”; “dishonesty, insincerity”,
“cooperation with the enemy”, “giving information”,
“harm, danger”
‒
signs of the concept
“
betrayal
”
.
Volume 04 Issue 10-2024
146
American Journal Of Philological Sciences
(ISSN
–
2771-2273)
VOLUME
04
ISSUE
10
P
AGES
:
141-146
OCLC
–
1121105677
Publisher:
Oscar Publishing Services
Servi
Linguistic factology allows you to identify the group of
referents of the concepts of
”
fidelity
“
and
”
betrayal".
CONCLUSION
The scope of application of these subjects is very wide:
first of all, the person himself characterizes, he includes
interpersonal and social relations. In general, many
synonyms that interpret the” Fidelity " concept
indicate their importance to speakers. In terms of
linguistic expression, these concepts are characterized
by a high degree of semiotic, "nominative density",
which a number of synonyms are not expressed as
well, but are also reflected in idiomatic and
paremiological units, mythological images.
REFERENCES
1.
Каган М.С. Философская теория ценностей
Текст.
/
М.С.Каган.
–
Санкт
-
Петербург:
Петрополис, 1997. –
C. 50.
2.
Корнилов О.А. Языковые картины мира как
производные
национальных
менталитетов
Текст. / О.А.Корнилов. 2
-
е изд., испр. и доп.
‒
Москва
:
Черо
, 2003.
–
C. 154.
3.
Малинович, М. В. Причинность Текст. / М. В.
Малинович // Внутренний мир человека:
Семантические
константы:
коллективная
монография к юбилею д
-
ра филол. наук, проф.
Ю.М.Малиновича / отв. ред. М.В.Малинович.
‒
Иркутск, 2007.
‒
С
. 42, 50-52.
4.
Пименова
М.В.
Проблемы
когнитивной
лингвистики и концептуальных исследований на
современном этапе Текст. / М.В.Пименова //
Ментальность
и
язык
:
коллективная
монография
/
отв.
ред.
М.В.Пименова.
Кемерово: КемГУ, 2006а.
-
С. 46.
5.
Чернейко JI.О. Лингво
-
философский анализ
абстрактного имени Текст. / Л.О.Чернейко.
‒
Москва
:
МГУ
им
.
М
.
В
.
Ломоносова
, 1997.
–
C. 121.
6.
Yarashova N. J. The lights of jewels of turkic
language in the works of Alisher Navoi //Theoretical
& Applied scien
ce Учредители: Теоретическая и
прикладная наука.–
2021.
–
2021.
–
Т. 9. –
С. 659
-
661.
7.
Jumayevna Y. N. Linguo culture logical features of
metaphors in children's literature (On the example
of khudayberdi tokhtabayev's creative work)
//ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary
Research Journal.
–
2019.
–
Т. 9. –
№. 4. –
С. 139
-145.
8.
Jumaevna Y. N. Occupation of the child's personal
mental status in dialogual speech //Asian Journal of
Multidimensional Research (AJMR).
–
2020.
–
Т. 9.
–
№. 5. –
С. 405
-408.
9.
Jumaevna N. Y. Development of linguocreative
abilities in children's speech //Modern Journal of
Social Sciences and Humanities.
–
2022.
–
Т. 3. –
С.
5-8.
10.
Jumaevna N. Y. Psychological Characteristics of
Preschool Children.
–
2022.
