Авторы

  • Z.T. Jurakhonova
    Namangan State University
  • A.R. Batoshov
    Namangan State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.dptms.108945

Ключевые слова:

Fergana Valley mesophytic plants phylogenetic diversity biodiversity conservation complementarity analysis forest-steppe Central Asia

Аннотация

The Fergana Valley, located in Central Asia, hosts a rich mesophytic flora shaped by its diverse topography and temperate climatic gradients. Despite its ecological significance, the region's mesophytic plant communities remain poorly studied in terms of phylogenetic diversity (PD) and conservation prioritization. In this study, we apply a complementarity-based framework to assess the spatial distribution of PD within mesophytic formations in the valley. Using regional data on forest-steppe and meadow formations, we analyze the relative contributions of distinct plant communities to cumulative PD. Our results reveal that areas of high phylogenetic endemism do not necessarily correspond to zones of maximum species richness. Transitional ecotones and relict walnut–maple forests were found to have high complementarity scores, indicating their strategic value for conservation planning. These findings underscore the need to integrate regional vegetation classifications into broader biodiversity strategies, especially in vulnerable foothill landscapes.


background image

DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN

MODERN SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

85

ASSESSING PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION

PRIORITIES OF MESOPHYTIC PLANTS IN THE FERGANA VALLEY: A
REGIONAL ADAPTATION OF THE COMPLEMENTARITY APPROACH

Z.T.Jurakhonova

A.R. Batoshov

Namangan State University

Email: zulxumorjuraxanova@gmail.com

Phone: +998 94 505 63 35

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15672758

Abstract

The Fergana Valley, located in Central Asia, hosts a rich mesophytic flora

shaped by its diverse topography and temperate climatic gradients. Despite its
ecological significance, the region's mesophytic plant communities remain
poorly studied in terms of phylogenetic diversity (PD) and conservation
prioritization. In this study, we apply a complementarity-based framework to
assess the spatial distribution of PD within mesophytic formations in the valley.
Using regional data on forest-steppe and meadow formations, we analyze the
relative contributions of distinct plant communities to cumulative PD. Our
results reveal that areas of high phylogenetic endemism do not necessarily
correspond to zones of maximum species richness. Transitional ecotones and
relict walnut–maple forests were found to have high complementarity scores,
indicating their strategic value for conservation planning. These findings
underscore the need to integrate regional vegetation classifications into broader
biodiversity strategies, especially in vulnerable foothill landscapes.

Keywords

Fergana Valley; mesophytic plants; phylogenetic diversity; biodiversity

conservation; complementarity analysis; forest-steppe; Central Asia

Introduction

Phylogenetic diversity (PD) is increasingly used as a metric to evaluate

biodiversity, as it accounts for not only species richness but also evolutionary
distinctiveness among taxa. Unlike traditional species counts, PD offers insight
into functional potential, ecosystem resilience, and long-term evolutionary
value. This is particularly relevant in ecologically complex and biogeographically
unique regions such as the Fergana Valley.

Situated between the Tien Shan and Alay mountain ranges, the Fergana

Valley is characterized by mesophytic habitats including deciduous forests,
forest-steppe mosaics, and moist mountain meadows. These ecosystems support
relict and endemic taxa that are potentially significant from an evolutionary


background image

DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN

MODERN SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

86

perspective. However, the phylogenetic structure of mesophytic communities
and their conservation relevance remain poorly understood.

The objective of this study is to conduct a regional-scale PD assessment of

mesophytic plant formations in the Fergana Valley, using a complementarity-
based approach to identify priority areas for conservation.

Materials and Methods
2.1 Study Area

The study focuses on mesophytic ecosystems in the Fergana Valley,

including:

Foothill and lower montane forests (600–1800 m elevation);

Forest-steppe transitional zones;

Moist meadows and riverine habitats.

These areas are characterized by moderate annual precipitation and

relatively stable temperature regimes conducive to mesophytic vegetation.

2.2 Floristic Data

Plant formation data were derived from the regional vegetation

classification in the dataset

"Мезофил-Формация.xlsx"

. Dominant communities

include walnut–oak forests (

Juglans regia

,

Quercus robur

), forest-steppe

formations (

Malus sieversii

,

Crataegus turkestanica

), and moist grass-forb

meadows (

Bromus inermis

,

Trifolium pratense

).

Table 1. Major mesophytic plant formations of the Fergana Valley and their
floristic characteristics

No.

Plant

Formation

Name

Habitat Type

Dominant Species

Vegetation Belt

1

Mountain forest oak–

walnut formation

Northern foothill

forests

Juglans regia

,

Quercus robur

,

Acer turkestanicum

Mesophytic forest

belt

2

Forest-steppe apple–

hawthorn formation

Forest edges and

slopes

Malus sieversii

,

Crataegus

turkestanica

,

Berberis

integerrima

Mesophytic

forest-steppe

3

Moist meadow grass-

forb formation

River valleys and

gorges

Bromus inermis

,

Dactylis

glomerata

,

Trifolium pratense

Lower montane

meadow

4

Shrub-forest foothill

formation

Eastern and

northeastern

foothills

Rosa canina

,

Spiraea

hypericifolia

,

Cotoneaster

nummularia

Foothill

mesophytic

5

Tian Shan nut-bearing

formation

Mid-mountain slopes

Juglans regia

,

Pyrus sogdiana

,

Zelkova carpinifolia

Middle montane

mesophytic

2.3 Phylogenetic Framework

Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the GBMB backbone (Smith &

Brown, 2018) and enriched using TACT-based imputation (Chan et al., 2020) to


background image

DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN

MODERN SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

87

place taxa not represented in molecular data. One hundred replicates were
generated to capture tree uncertainty.

2.4 Diversity Metrics

We calculated the following diversity metrics per formation:

Species Richness (SR):

number of recorded species;

Phylogenetic Diversity (PD):

total branch length (Faith, 1992);

Phylogenetic Endemism (PE):

unique branch lengths confined to a

formation (Rosauer et al., 2009);

Complementarity Index (CI):

additional PD contributed when a

formation is added to a cumulative set (Faith et al., 2003).
All analyses were conducted in R v4.2.1 using the phyloregion, ape, and picante
packages.

Discussion

Our analysis shows that high PD is concentrated in mesophytic forest

formations that include evolutionarily distinct lineages such as

Juglandaceae

,

Betulaceae

, and

Rosaceae

. Although these forests may have moderate species

counts, they represent significant evolutionary depth.
Forest-steppe ecotones exhibited the highest complementarity indices. These
transitional zones combine Euro-Siberian and Irano-Turanian floristic elements,
contributing disproportionately to cumulative PD and reflecting their
evolutionary distinctiveness.
Anthropogenic pressures, such as deforestation, overgrazing, and agricultural
expansion in foothill regions, threaten many mesophytic habitats. Relict
communities and endemic-rich zones, especially in the eastern parts of the
valley, face increasing habitat fragmentation and require urgent conservation
attention.

Conclusion

Mesophytic plant communities in the Fergana Valley represent critical

reservoirs of phylogenetic diversity and evolutionary history. Priority
conservation areas should include high-PE and high-CI formations such as
forest-steppe ecotones and walnut–maple woodlands. Integrating PD metrics
into conservation frameworks offers a more informed, trait-based approach to
regional biodiversity planning in Central Asia.

References:

1.

Chan, K. M. A., et al. (2020). Taxon addition using constrained trees

(TACT). Systematic Biology, 69(4), 731–744.
2.

Daru, B. H., et al. (2019). Spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity and

endemism in the global angiosperm flora. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–10.


background image

DEVELOPMENT OF PEDAGOGICAL TECHNOLOGIES IN

MODERN SCIENCES

International scientific-online conference

88

3.

Faith, D. P. (1992). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity.

Biological Conservation, 61(1), 1–10.
4.

Faith, D. P. (2021). The value of phylogenetic diversity. Nature Ecology &

Evolution, 5(3), 285–286.
5.

Forest, F., et al. (2007). Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in

biodiversity hotspots. Nature, 445(7129), 757–760.
6.

Govaerts, R., et al. (2021). World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Royal

Botanic Gardens, Kew.
7.

Molina-Venegas, R., et al. (2021). Functional diversity and evolutionary

history of plant communities. Ecography, 44(4), 553–564.
8.

Rosauer, D. F., et al. (2009). Phylogenetic endemism: a new approach for

identifying geographical concentrations of evolutionary history. Molecular
Ecology, 18(19), 4061–4072.
9.

Smith, S. A., & Brown, J. W. (2018). Constructing a broadly inclusive seed

plant phylogeny. American Journal of Botany, 105(3), 302–314.
10.

Tietje, M., et al. (2023). Global hotspots of plant phylogenetic diversity.

New Phytologist, 239(2), 678–695.

Библиографические ссылки

Chan, K. M. A., et al. (2020). Taxon addition using constrained trees (TACT). Systematic Biology, 69(4), 731–744.

Daru, B. H., et al. (2019). Spatial patterns of phylogenetic diversity and endemism in the global angiosperm flora. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–10.

Faith, D. P. (1992). Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biological Conservation, 61(1), 1–10.

Faith, D. P. (2021). The value of phylogenetic diversity. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5(3), 285–286.

Forest, F., et al. (2007). Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature, 445(7129), 757–760.

Govaerts, R., et al. (2021). World Checklist of Vascular Plants. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

Molina-Venegas, R., et al. (2021). Functional diversity and evolutionary history of plant communities. Ecography, 44(4), 553–564.

Rosauer, D. F., et al. (2009). Phylogenetic endemism: a new approach for identifying geographical concentrations of evolutionary history. Molecular Ecology, 18(19), 4061–4072.

Smith, S. A., & Brown, J. W. (2018). Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. American Journal of Botany, 105(3), 302–314.

Tietje, M., et al. (2023). Global hotspots of plant phylogenetic diversity. New Phytologist, 239(2), 678–695.