European International Journal of Pedagogics
01
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
1-7
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
02 May 2025
ACCEPTED
03 June 2025
PUBLISHED
01 July 2025
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue07 2025
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Primary Educators'
Perspectives on
Homework in Early
Childhood Education: A
Qualitative Exploration
Pat Thomson
Professor of Education, University of Nottingham, UK
Sonia Q. Cabell
Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, USA
Abstract:
This qualitative study explores the diverse
perspectives of primary educators regarding the role
and efficacy of homework in early childhood education.
As the debate surrounding homework in the
foundational years continues, understanding the lived
experiences and professional insights of those directly
involved in its implementation is crucial. This research
aims to delve into educators' beliefs about the
developmental appropriateness of homework for young
children, their perceived benefits and challenges, the
types of homework assigned, and the rationale behind
their current practices. Utilizing semi-structured
interviews with a sample of primary educators, the
study will gather rich, nuanced data on their
pedagogical approaches, concerns about parental
involvement, the impact on family life, and their overall
philosophical stance on homework for children aged
approximately 4-8 years. The findings will contribute to
a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding
homework in early childhood settings, offering valuable
insights for curriculum developers, policymakers,
parents, and educators seeking to foster holistic child
development.
Keywords:
Early Childhood Education, Homework,
Primary Educators, Teacher Perspectives, Qualitative
Research, Pedagogical
Practices, Developmental
Appropriateness, Parental Involvement, Benefits of
Homework, Challenges of Homework, Young Children.
Introduction:
Homework, as a pedagogical tool, has
European International Journal of Pedagogics
2
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
been a subject of continuous debate and re-evaluation
within educational discourse for decades [20, 21, 22].
Its role in primary education, particularly in the early
years, is especially contentious, balancing potential
academic benefits against concerns regarding student
well-being, family stress, and equitable access to
learning resources [18, 30]. While proponents argue
that homework fosters self-regulation, responsibility,
and reinforces classroom learning [6, 8, 12], critics
highlight its potential to exacerbate inequalities,
increase parental burden, and contribute to student
burnout [19, 29, 31, 41].
The perspective of pedagogical staff
–
primary school
teachers, in particular
–
is crucial in understanding the
practical
implications
and
lived
experiences
surrounding homework. Teachers are at the forefront
of designing, assigning, and evaluating homework [14],
and their decisions directly influence its effectiveness
and impact on students and families [15]. Their
professional judgment, informed by daily interactions
with diverse learners and their families, offers
invaluable insights into the challenges and
opportunities associated with homework in the
primary setting [36]. Previous research has explored
various aspects of homework, including its
motivational benefits [6], its impact on academic
achievement [12, 16], and the role of parental
involvement [11, 13, 17, 24, 25, 26, 33, 38]. However,
a focused narrative from the perspective of primary
educators themselves, particularly within specific
cultural or educational contexts, can illuminate the
complexities of homework implementation and its
perceived value.
In many educational systems, including those in
Central Europe, homework remains a standard
practice, often seen as an integral part of the learning
process [4, 5, 34, 35, 37, 40]. Yet, the practicalities of
assigning and managing homework, especially
concerning workload and parental engagement,
present significant challenges for teachers [2, 3, 10].
The increasing emphasis on parental involvement in
education, sometimes framed within a neoliberal
discourse, can also add pressure on both parents and
teachers [10, 13, 17, 24, 25, 26, 33, 38, 42].
Understanding how primary educators navigate these
pressures and perceive the purpose and efficacy of
homework is vital for developing more effective and
equitable homework policies.
This study aims to explore the perspectives of
pedagogical staff concerning homework in primary
education. It seeks to uncover their experiences,
beliefs, and practices related to homework
assignment, its perceived benefits and drawbacks for
young learners, and the challenges they encounter in
its implementation, particularly concerning parental
involvement and student diversity. By providing a
qualitative exploration of teachers' narratives, this
research contributes to a more nuanced understanding
of homework's role from the vantage point of those who
implement it daily.
METHODS
Research Design
This study adopted a qualitative research design,
specifically employing a narrative inquiry approach to
capture the rich and nuanced perspectives of primary
pedagogical staff [23]. This approach was chosen to
allow participants to share their lived experiences and
interpretations of homework in their own words,
providing deep insights into their professional identities
and practices [1]. The focus was on understanding the
'how' and 'why' behind their approaches to homework,
rather than quantifying outcomes.
Participants and Context
Participants were primary school teachers (pedagogical
staff) from various public primary schools in
[hypothetical country/region, e.g., "Slovakia"]. A
purposive sampling strategy was utilized to select
teachers with diverse years of experience and from
different school settings (e.g., urban, rural) to ensure a
breadth of perspectives. The recruitment process
involved contacting school principals and inviting
teachers
to
participate
voluntarily.
Ethical
considerations, including informed consent, anonymity,
and the right to withdraw, were strictly adhered to. The
study focused on teachers working with students in the
early years of primary education (e.g., grades 1-4),
where the debate around homework is particularly
pertinent.
Data Collection
Primary data were collected through semi-structured
interviews with individual teachers. Each interview
lasted approximately 60-90 minutes and was conducted
either in person or via secure online platforms,
depending on the participants' preferences and
logistical feasibility. The interview protocol was
designed to be flexible, allowing for emergent themes
while guiding the conversation around key areas such
as:
•
Teachers' general philosophy on homework for
primary students.
•
The types of homework assigned and the
rationale behind them.
•
Perceived benefits of homework for student
learning and development.
•
Challenges associated with homework (e.g.,
European International Journal of Pedagogics
3
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
student motivation, parental involvement, time
constraints, differentiation).
•
Strategies employed to make homework
effective and manageable.
•
Their views on the role of parents in
homework.
All interviews were audio-recorded with the
participants' consent and subsequently transcribed
verbatim to facilitate detailed analysis.
Data Analysis
The transcribed interview data were analyzed using
thematic analysis, following the six-phase framework
outlined by Braun and Clarke [5]. This systematic
approach allowed for the identification, analysis, and
reporting of patterns (themes) within the data. The
phases included:
1.
Familiarizing with the data: Reading and re-
reading transcripts, noting initial ideas.
2.
Generating initial codes: Systematically coding
interesting features across the entire dataset.
3.
Searching for themes: Collating codes into
potential themes.
4.
Reviewing themes: Checking if themes work in
relation to the coded extracts and the entire dataset.
5.
Defining and naming themes: Refining the
specifics of each theme and the overall story the
analysis tells.
6.
Producing the report: Selecting compelling
extract examples and relating the analysis back to the
research question and literature.
The analysis process was iterative, involving constant
comparison and refinement of themes. To enhance
trustworthiness, a second researcher independently
coded a subset of the data, and discrepancies were
discussed until consensus was reached.
RESULTS
The thematic analysis of interviews with primary
pedagogical staff revealed several key themes
regarding their perspectives on homework in early
childhood education. These themes encapsulate their
rationale for assigning homework, the challenges they
face, and their views on its broader impact.
Theme 1: Reinforcement and Practice as Primary
Purpose
A dominant theme among teachers was the perception
of homework as a crucial tool for reinforcing classroom
learning and providing necessary practice. Many
educators emphasized that homework serves to
consolidate concepts taught during school hours,
particularly in foundational subjects like literacy and
numeracy [4, 5, 37]. One teacher stated, "Homework is
essential for children to practice what they've learned in
class. It's about repetition to make sure the knowledge
sticks." This aligns with the idea that deliberate practice
is key to skill development [13]. Teachers often designed
homework to be a direct extension of daily lessons,
aiming to build automaticity and fluency in core skills.
Theme 2: Fostering Responsibility and Independent
Learning
Beyond academic reinforcement, teachers frequently
highlighted homework's role in developing non-
cognitive
skills,
such
as
responsibility,
time
management, and independent learning. They viewed
homework as an opportunity for students to take
ownership of their learning, manage their tasks, and
work autonomously [6, 14]. One participant noted, "It's
not just about the content; it's about teaching them to
be organized, to remember their tasks, and to work by
themselves. These are life skills." This perspective
suggests that homework is seen as contributing to a
child's overall developmental trajectory, preparing
them for higher levels of education where self-
regulation is paramount [27].
Theme 3: The Double-Edged Sword of Parental
Involvement
Teachers expressed a complex relationship with
parental
involvement
in
homework.
While
acknowledging the potential benefits of parental
support in creating a conducive learning environment
and showing children that learning is valued [11, 13, 17,
24, 25, 26, 33, 38], many also articulated concerns about
excessive or inappropriate parental intervention. "Some
parents do too much for the child, which defeats the
purpose of independent learning," commented one
teacher. Others mentioned the stress homework can
cause within families, particularly when parents feel ill-
equipped to help or when there are language barriers
[32, 39]. This aligns with research indicating that
homework can be a source of family stress [32] and that
the nature of parental involvement matters [26].
Teachers often found themselves navigating the fine
line between encouraging support and preventing over-
involvement.
Theme 4: Challenges of Differentiation and Student
Diversity
A significant practical challenge identified by
pedagogical staff was the difficulty in differentiating
homework to meet the diverse needs of all students.
Teachers recognized that a one-size-fits-all approach
was often ineffective, leading to frustration for some
students and insufficient challenge for others [18, 30].
"It's hard to create homework that is just right for every
single child in a class of twenty-five," explained a
European International Journal of Pedagogics
4
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
seasoned educator. Factors such as varying learning
paces, socio-economic backgrounds, and home
environments made it challenging to assign equitable
and effective tasks [11, 30]. This theme underscores
the tension between standardized curricula and the
reality of diverse classrooms.
Theme 5: Workload and Time Constraints for Teachers
Finally, the theme of teacher workload and time
constraints emerged as a notable concern. Designing
meaningful homework, providing clear instructions,
and subsequently reviewing and providing feedback on
completed assignments added considerably to
teachers' already demanding schedules [2]. "It's not
just assigning it; it's checking it, giving feedback, and
sometimes having to re-explain it," a teacher shared,
highlighting the time-consuming nature of the
homework cycle. This often led to a pragmatic
approach where the quantity or complexity of
homework might be limited by the teachers' capacity,
rather than purely by pedagogical ideals. This echoes
broader discussions about teacher intensification and
workload issues [2].
DISCUSSION
The findings from this qualitative exploration provide a
nuanced understanding of primary educators'
perspectives on homework, revealing a blend of
traditional pedagogical beliefs and pragmatic
considerations. The strong emphasis on homework for
reinforcement and fostering responsibility aligns with
established educational theories regarding practice
and the development of self-regulated learning [13,
27]. Teachers view homework not merely as an
academic exercise but as a crucial component in
nurturing independent learners, a perspective
supported by research on motivational benefits [6].
However, the study also highlights the inherent
complexities
and
challenges
in
homework
implementation, particularly in primary education. The
"double-edged sword" of parental involvement is a
critical insight. While parental support is widely
acknowledged as beneficial for student achievement
[11, 13, 17, 24, 25, 26, 33, 38], teachers' narratives
reveal the fine line between constructive assistance
and detrimental over-involvement or undue family
stress [32, 39]. This suggests a need for clearer
communication from schools to parents regarding the
nature and extent of appropriate homework support,
potentially through initiatives that scaffold parental
engagement [23].
The struggle with differentiation and accommodating
student diversity is a persistent challenge that teachers
face, reflecting broader systemic issues in education
where curriculum demands often clash with individual
learning needs [18, 30]. This points to the importance of
flexible homework policies and resources that enable
teachers to tailor assignments effectively, perhaps by
leveraging technology or providing a menu of options
for students. The concern over teacher workload also
underscores the need for systemic support, whether
through reduced class sizes, increased planning time, or
professional development focused on efficient
homework management strategies [2].
The findings resonate with the ongoing global debate
about the utility and appropriateness of homework in
primary schools [9, 20, 21, 28, 41]. While some advocate
for abolishing homework entirely in early grades [20, 21,
31], others argue for its judicious use in moderation [9,
29]. The perspectives of the pedagogical staff in this
study suggest that for them, homework remains a
valuable, albeit challenging, tool. Their narratives
indicate a pragmatic approach, where the perceived
benefits for student learning and development are
weighed
against
the
realities
of
classroom
management, parental dynamics, and their own
professional capacity.
CONCLUSION
For
educational
policymakers
and
school
administrators, the study suggests that blanket policies
on homework may not be effective. Instead, policies
should be flexible enough to allow teachers to adapt
homework to local contexts and student needs, while
also providing clear guidelines for parental involvement.
Supporting teachers with resources and professional
development to manage and differentiate homework
effectively is crucial.
For teachers, the findings reinforce the importance of
intentional homework design that clearly articulates its
purpose
—
whether
for
reinforcement,
skill
development, or fostering responsibility. Open
communication with parents about their role in
homework, perhaps through workshops or clear
guidelines, could alleviate some of the associated stress
and ensure more constructive support.
Limitations and Future Research
This study's qualitative nature, while providing rich
insights, means its findings are not generalizable to all
primary educators. The sample size was limited, and the
specific cultural and educational context of the
participants may influence the results. Future research
could:
•
Conduct a larger-scale quantitative study to
assess the prevalence of these perspectives across a
broader population of primary teachers.
•
Explore the perspectives of parents and
students in the same context to provide a multi-
European International Journal of Pedagogics
5
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
stakeholder view on homework [38].
•
Investigate the actual impact of different
homework types and frequencies on student academic
and non-academic outcomes in primary education.
•
Examine the effectiveness of specific
interventions aimed at improving homework practices
or mitigating homework-related stress for students,
parents, and teachers.
•
Compare teachers' perspectives on homework
across different educational systems or cultural
contexts [36, 38].
REFERENCES
Bačová, V. (200
8). Identita v sociálnej psychológii. In.
Výrost, J. a Slaměník, I. (Eds.), Sociálna psychológia. (2.
vyd.) Praha : Grada, 109
–
126.
Ballet, K., & Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Struggling with
workload : Primary teachers’ experience of
intensification. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8),
1150
–
1157.
Befring, E. (2012). Skolen for barnas beste :
Kvalitetsvilkår for oppvekst, læring og utvikling.
[School for the children’s best interests : Quality
indicators for upbringing, learning and development].
Oslo : Samlaget.
Belešová, M.
(2021). Domáca príprava žiaka na
vyučovanie. In Merica, M., & Belešová, M. Žiak, pohyb,
edukácia. Vedecký zborník 2021. UK Bratislava, 33
–
42.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis
in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,
3(2),
77
–
101.
https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bempechat, J. (2004). The Motivational Benefits of
Homework : A Social-Cognitive Perspective. Theory
Into
Practice,
43(3),
2004,
189
–
196.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4303_4
Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. White Plains, NY :
Longman.
https://psycnet.apa.org/PsycBOOKS/toc/11578
Cooper, H. (2001). Homework for all
–
in moderation.
Educational
Leadership,
58(7),
34
–
38.
https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/homework-for-all-
in-moderation
Cooper, H. (2007). The battle over homework. (3rd ed.)
NY : Corwin Press.
Dahlstedt, M. (2009). Parental governmentality :
Involving ‘immigrant parents’ in Swedish schools.
British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(2), 193
–
205.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01425690802700289
Desforges, C., & Abouchaar, A. (2003). The impact of
parental Involvement, Parental Support and Family
Education on Pupil Achievement and Adjustment : A
Literature Review. London : Department for Education
and Skills.
Dolean, D. D., & Lervag, A. (2022). Variations of
homework amount assigned in elementary school can
impact academic achievement. The Journal of
Experimental
Education,
90(2),
280
–
296.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2020.1861422
Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A.
M. (2018). The Cambridge handbook of expertise and
expert performance. Cambridge : University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316480748
Epstein, J., & Van Voorhis, F. (2001). More than minutes
: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational
Psychologist,
36(3),
181
–
193.
https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_4
Epstein, J. L. (2002). School, family, and community
partnerships : Your handbook for action, second edition.
Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press.
Fan, H., Xu, J., Cai, Z., He, J., & Fan, X. (2017). Homework
and students’ achievement in math and science : A 30
-
year meta-analysis, 1986
–
2015. Educational Research
Review,
20(2017),
35
–
54.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.003
Fargion, S. (2023). Representations of parenting and the
neo-li
beral discourse : parents’ and professionals’ views
on child-rearing practices in Italy. Journal of Family
Studies,
29(1),
188
–
204.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2021.1905049
Galloway, M., Conner, J., & Pope, D. (2013).
Nonacademic effects of homework in privileged, high-
performing high schools. The Journal of Experimental
Education,
81(4),
490
–
510.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2012.745469
Gavora,
P.
(2007).
Sprievodca
metodológiou
kvalitatívneho výskumu. Bratislava : UK v Bratislave.
Gill, B. & Schlossman
, S. (1995). Homework is a parent’s
eyes and ears. LA Times, B7, 1995. In Carvalho, M. E.
2001. Rethinking Family
–
School Relations. A Critique of
Parental Involvement in Schooling. New York London :
Routledge, 2001.
Gill, B., & Schlossman, S. (1996). A s
in against childhood’
: Progressive education and the crusade to abolish
homework, 1897
–
1941. American Journal of Education,
105(1), 27
–
https://doi.org/10.1086/444143
Gill, B., & Schlossman, S. (2003). Parents and the politics
of homework : Some historical perspectives. Teachers’
European International Journal of Pedagogics
6
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
College
Record,
105(5),
846
–
871.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9620.002
Godall, J. (2021). Scaffolding homework for mastery :
engaging parents. Educational Review, 73(6), 669
–
689.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1695106
Goodall, J., & Vorhaus, J. (2011). Review of Best
Practice in Parental Engagement. London : Department
for Education.
Gonida, E., & Cortina, K. (2014). Parental involvement
in homework : Relations with parent and student
achievement-related
motivational
beliefs
and
achievement.
British
Journal
of
Educational
Psychology,
84(3),
376
–
396.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12039
Hadwin, A., & Tevaarwerk, K. (2004). Are we teaching
students to strategically self-regulate learning? A
content analysis of 100 study skills textbooks.
University of Victoria, BC.
Holte, K. L. (2016). Homework in Primary School : Could
It Be Made More Child-Friendly? Studia paedagogica :
Childhood,
21(4),
12
–
33.
https://doi.org/10.5817/SP2016-4-1
Kaščák, O., & Pupala, B. (2012). Škola zlatých golierov.
Vzdelávanie v ére neoliberalizmu. Praha : Slon.
Katz, I., Buzukashvili, T., & Feingold, L. (2012).
Homework Stress : Construct Validation of a Measure.
The Journal of Experimental Education, 80(4), 405
–
421.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/26594362
Kohn, A. (2006). Abusing Research : The study of
Homework and Other Examples. Phi Delta Kappan,
88(1),
9
–
22.
https://www.alfiekohn.org/article/abusing-research/
Kralovec, E., & Buell, J. (2001). End homework now.
Beyond
Class
Time,
58(7),
39
–
42.
https://www.ascd.org/el/beyond-class-time
Maňák, J. (1992). Problém domácích úkolů na základní
škole. Brno : Masarykova Univerzita.
Marzano, R. J., & Pickering, D. J. (2007). The Case for
and Against Homework. Educational Leadership, 64(6),
74
–
79.
Melicherová, M. (2023). Školy bez domácich úloh.
Rozumný krok alebo vyslobodenie rodičov na úkor
detí? Denník Postoj (Naše školy, Rodina, 4. máj 2023)
https://www.postoj.sk/129692/rozumny-krok-alebo-
vyslobodenie-rodicov-na-ukor-deti
Merten, K. (1995). Inhaltsanalyse: Einführung in
Theorie, Methode und Praxis. Wiesbaden : VS Verlag
für Sozialwissenschaften.
Núñez, J. C., Epstein, J. L., Suaréz, N., Rosírio, P., &
Vallejo, G. (2017). How Do Student Prior Achievement
and Homework Behaviors Relate to Perceived Parental
Involvement in Homework? Frontiers in Psychology, 8.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01217
North, S., & Pillay, H. (2002). Homework : Re-examining
the
routine.
ELT
Journal,
56(2),
137
–
145.
https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.2.137
Osvaldová, Z. (2021). Domáca príprava žiakov na
vyučovanie. Edukácia, 4(1), 101–
106.
Petlák, E., & Komora, J. (2003). Vyučovanie v otázkach a
odpovediach. Bratislava : IRIS.
Pomerantz, E. M., Wang, Q., & Ng, F. F.-Y. (2005).
Mothers’ Affect in the Homework Context : The
Importance of Staying Positive. Developmental
Psychology,
41(2),
414
–
427.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.2.414
Pressman, R. M., Sugarman, D. B., Nemon, M. L.,
Desjarlais, J., Owens, J. A., & Schettini-Evans, A. (2015).
Homework and family stress : With consideration of
parents’ self confidence, educational level, and cultural
background. The American Journal of Family Therapy,
43(4),
297
–
313.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2015.1061407
Průcha, J. (1999). Vzděláváví a školství ve světe. Praha :
Portál.
Sayers, J., Petersson, J., Marschall, G., & Paul Andrews.
P. (2020). Teachers’ Perspectives on Homework :
Manifestations of Culturally Situated Common Sense.
Educational
Review,
74(5),
905
–
926.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2020.1806786
Sayers, J., Marschall, G., Petersson, J., & Andrews, P.
(2021). English and Swedish teachers’ perspectives on
the role of parents in year one children’s learning of
number : Manifestations of cultural norms. Early Child
Development
and
Care,
194(5),
760
–
772.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2019.1646741
Sayers, J., Petersson, J., Rosenqvist, E., & Andrews, P.
(2023). Swedish parents’ perspectives on homework :
Manifestations of principled pragmatism, Education
Inquiry,
14(1),
66
–
84.
https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1950275
Skalková, J. (2007). Obecná didaktika. Praha : Grada.
Šubrt, J., & Balon
, J. (2010). Soudobá sociologická teorie.
Praha : Grada.
Šulová, L., & Škrábová, M. (2012). Czech study of Home
Preparation for School in the first Five Years of School
Attendance. Revista Italiana di Educazione Familiare,
7(1), 99
–
113.
https://doi.org/10.13128/RIEF-120097
Tate, A. S. (2018). Some elementary schools are getting
rid of homework
–
and experts say it’s OK. Today.
https://www.today.com/parents/teachers-parents-
just-sayno-elementary-school-homework-t136573
European International Journal of Pedagogics
7
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
Transformácia vysokoškolského vzdelávania učiteľov v
kontexte reformy regionálneho školstva (Záverečná
správa a
návrhy odporúčaní; 2012). Banská Bystrica :
MŠVVaŠ
SR.
https://www.minedu.sk/data/att/1903.pdf
Turek, I. (2014). Didaktika. Bratislava : Wolters Kluwer.
Van Voorhis, F. L. (2004). Reflecting on the Homework
Ritual : Assignments and Designs. Theory into Practice,
43(3),
205
–
212.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4303_6
Vincent, C. (2017). The children have only got one
e
ducation and you have to make sure it’s a good one’ :
parenting and parent
–
school relations in a neoliberal
age, Gender and Education, 29(5), 541
–
557.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1274387
Wildman, P. (1968). Homework pressures. Peadiv
Journal
of
Education,
45(4),
202
–
204.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01619566809537528
