IMPACT OF ADOPTING DIFFERENT TEACHING PRACTICES ON ACCOUNTING EDUCATION
Keywords:
Abstract
This study examines the impact of adopting different teaching practices on accounting education. With the goal of improving instructional strategies and enhancing students' learning experiences and outcomes in the field of accounting, the study investigates the effects of various teaching practices on student performance, engagement, critical thinking, and knowledge acquisition. The research design involves a comparative analysis of different teaching approaches, including traditional lecture-based teaching, active learning strategies, case-based learning, and technology-enhanced instruction. Data collection methods include surveys, assessments, student feedback, and classroom observations. The results provide valuable insights into the influence of different teaching practices on accounting education, informing educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers on effective approaches to enhance teaching and learning in accounting.
Similar Articles
-
POSSIBILITIES OF USING NATIONAL VALUES IN TRAINING PEDAGOGUES FOR PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
European International Journal of Pedagogics: No. 01 (2024) / Zhiyankulova R.Kh., -
WHAT IS VIOLENCE AND HOW TO IDENTIFY IT?
European International Journal of Pedagogics: No. 01 (2023) / Abduraimova Nilufar,
References
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). Open University Press.
Bonner, J. M., & Walker, P. L. (2004). Teaching approaches and student outcomes in undergraduate management accounting courses. Journal of Accounting Education, 22(1), 37-50.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation, and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40(1), 99-121.
Maher, M. W., & Sullivan, G. B. (2013). The effects of active learning on students' higher-order thinking skills in accounting courses. Issues in Accounting Education, 28(2), 357-376.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Quinn, C. E., & Sweeney, B. (2007). Applying active learning methods to the teaching of management accounting. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(3), 201-218.
Schönwetter, D. J., Sokal, L., Friesen, M., & Taylor, K. L. (2002). Teaching philosophies reconsidered: A conceptual model for the development and evaluation of teaching philosophy statements. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(1), 83-97.
Smith, K. G., Houston, B., & Richardson, M. A. (2005). Accounting education in the 21st century: A cross-cultural comparison of perceptions of desirable graduate attributes. Accounting Education, 14(4), 471-488.
