This research paper presents a comparative analysis of teacher performance indicators in two distinct educational contexts: Turkey and the United States. Teacher performance evaluation is crucial for maintaining high-quality education systems and ensuring effective teaching practices. The study examines the teacher evaluation frameworks and performance indicators utilized in both countries, exploring the similarities, differences, and underlying factors that influence their implementation. A mixed-methods approach is employed, incorporating document analysis and expert interviews to gather comprehensive data. The findings shed light on the strengths and weaknesses of teacher performance evaluation systems in each country, providing valuable insights for policymakers and educators seeking to enhance teaching quality and professional development.
Akdemir, A. S. (2013). A history of teacher training programmes and their problems in Turkey. Turkish Studies - International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(12), 15-28.
Altun, S. A., & Memişoğlu, S. P. (2008). The opinions of teachers, administrators and supervisors regarding performance assesment. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 7-24.
Anagün, Ş. S. (2002). Performance appraisal process in education and performance appraisal methods used in human resource management (Unpublished master thesis). Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
Archer, J. (2000) State teacher policies tied to student results, Education Week, 19 (17), 3-4.
Atik Kara, D. (2012). Evaluation of teaching profession courses in terms of teacher candidates? Competencies regarding the learning and teaching process (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
Balkar, B. (2014). Perceptions of teachers on research-based teacher education policy comprising knowledge domains of clinically-based approach. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(4), 28-45.
Biswas, S. (2009). Organizational culture & transformational leadership as predictors of employee performance. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(4), 611- 627.
Bommer,W. H., Johnson, J. L., Rich, G. A., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1995). On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures or employee performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 48, 587–605.
Buyruk, H. (2014). Standardized examinations as a teacher performance indicator and performance evaluation in education . Trakya University Journal of Education, 4(2), 28-42.
Conroy, J., Hulme, M., & Menter, I. (2013). Developing a ‘clinical’ model for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 39(5), 557-573.
Cooper, B.S., Ehrensal, P.A. & Bromme, M. (2005). School-level politics and Professional development: Traps in evaluating the quality of practicing teachers. Educational Policy,29(1), 112-125.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2013, April). Interstate Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium InTASC Model Core Teaching Standards and Learning Progressions for Teachers 1.0: A Resource for Ongoing Teacher Development. Washington, DC: Author.