European International Journal of Pedagogics
34
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
34-37
DOI
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
03 January 2025
ACCEPTED
05 February 2025
PUBLISHED
11 March 2025
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue03 2025
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
Types of education in the
works of Abdukadir
Shakuri and their
significance today
Ashurova Dilrabo Isroil qizi
PhD student at Termez State University, Uzbekistan
Abstract:
This paper explores the educational
philosophy of Abdukadir Shakuri, a prominent figure of
the Jadid reform movement in Central Asia. Shakuri
advocated a holistic model of education that integrates
moral and spiritual development with academic
breadth, practical skills, and cultural consciousness. He
emphasized the importance of character formation
rooted in Islamic ethics, yet open to universal human
values and modern knowledge. Recognizing the need
for updated pedagogical methods, Shakuri championed
interactive instruction and student-centered learning, a
departure from the rote memorization typical of
traditional maktab and madrasa systems of his time. He
also insisted on connecting education to real-world
challenges, promoting vocational training and the
inclusion of global subjects like science, foreign
languages, and history. This approach remains relevant
today for its balanced synthesis of faith and progress,
advocacy of hands-on skills, affirmation of cultural
identity, and dynamic methods of instruction. By
reviewing Shakuri’s works and highlighting their
contemporary significance, the study illustrates how his
ideals can inform modern debates over the place of
moral instruction, the practical utility of schooling, and
the interplay of tradition and innovation in curriculum
design.
Keywords:
Abdukadir Shakuri, Jadid Movement, Holistic
Education, Moral Development, Practical Skills,
Pedagogical Reform, Cultural Identity.
Introduction:
Abdukadir Shakuri occupies an important
place in the history of educational thought within
Central Asia, particularly in Uzbekistan. His writings and
activities were closely connected to the broader Jadid
movement of the late nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries, which sought to reform and modernize
European International Journal of Pedagogics
35
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
various aspects of cultural, social, and intellectual life
across the Muslim communities of the Russian Empire.
Although perhaps not as universally recognized
worldwide as some other educational thinkers,
Shakuri’s impact on peda
gogy in his region has been
profound. He championed progressive educational
reforms that sought to integrate Islamic learning with
modern secular subjects, all under the unifying notion
that education should serve moral, intellectual, and
communal advancement. The types of education he
discussed in his works highlight key themes of moral
instruction, the importance of practical knowledge, the
re-interpretation of religious teaching, and the broader
social role of learning institutions. These ideas, though
rooted in a particular historical and cultural context,
continue to resonate with contemporary educational
theorists and practitioners who grapple with questions
about the integration of tradition and modernity in
school curricula.
To fully understand the types of education Shakuri
proposed, it is useful first to establish the intellectual
climate in which he worked. The Jadid reformers faced
enormous challenges in a colonial environment where
Muslim communities were subjected to the political
control of the Russian Empire. The older forms of
Islamic schooling, known as maktabs and madrasas,
were often criticized for their outdated methods,
heavy reliance on rote memorization, and lack of focus
on practical knowledge. Reformers like Shakuri and his
contemporaries
believed
that the traditional
approaches, while valuable in preserving religious and
cultural identity, had to be refined or supplemented to
meet the demands of a rapidly changing world. The
result was the so-
called “new
-metho
d” schools (usuli
jadid), which introduced new pedagogical techniques
and a broader curriculum that included subjects such
as geography, mathematics, history, science, and
foreign languages. It was in this environment that
Shakuri’s ideas flourished and co
ntributed to an
emerging notion of holistic education.
A crucial dimension in Shakuri’s works is moral and
spiritual education. He placed great emphasis on the
formation of ethical character, rooted in Islamic
teachings but likewise open to universal human values.
For Shakuri, education extended beyond the mere
transmission of knowledge and skills. It was also a
means of cultivating virtue, piety, and social
responsibility in young people. This focus on moral
upbringing was not limited to formal lessons in a
classroom setting. Rather, he believed that teachers
themselves should emdiv the virtues of honesty,
diligence, and compassion, thereby serving as role
models for their students. While religious content was
certainly integral to this moral training, Shakuri insisted
that moral growth should not be reduced to dogmatic
instruction. Students were encouraged to reflect on the
ethical dimensions of their actions and the wider
consequences for society. Shakuri’s moral and spiritual
approach to education thus aligned closely with the
broader Jadid desire to revitalize Muslim communities
through a synthesis of faith and modern awareness.
Another significant type of education emphasized by
Shakuri was intellectual or academic learning. Although
deeply rooted in his Islamic heritage, he supported the
inclusion of modern secular subjects in the curriculum.
He argued that scientific understanding, historical
awareness, and linguistic competence were vital for the
empowerment of individuals and the progress of
society. By encouraging the study of the natural
sciences, students could better comprehend the laws of
nature and apply this knowledge to practical
improvements in agriculture, industry, and public
health. By examining global history, they could develop
broader
perspectives on
social
and
political
development, enriching their sense of identity and
agency. By learning foreign languages, they could open
doors to international scholarship, dialogue, and trade.
Shakuri’s insistence on academic inclusiveness was part
of a larger movement to dispel the misconception that
Islam was inherently opposed to modern learning.
Instead, he and other Jadids championed the view that
knowledge
—
whether sacred or worldly
—
should be
pursued in service to the common good.
Practical educa
tion, in Shakuri’s view, was equally
important. He recognized that for educational reforms
to have a tangible impact on people’s lives, schools had
to prepare young people to engage directly with the
economic and social realities of their communities. This
practical orientation manifested in a variety of ways,
from encouraging hands-on activities in the classroom
to advocating vocational training. Shakuri believed that
cultivating the practical skills of students would
strengthen local economies, reduce unemployment,
and raise living standards. Whether these skills involved
basic arithmetic for commerce, technical competencies
for certain trades, or agricultural knowledge tailored to
the local climate, the objective was the same: to ensure
that education did not remain a purely abstract
exercise, but rather served the concrete needs of
individuals and the wider society. Through this emphasis
on practicality, Shakuri moved beyond theoretical
discussions of pedagogy to propose reforms that could
be immediately implemented in schools and
communities alike.
A further dimension, intimately linked with Shakuri’s
educational philosophy, was the cultivation of national
and cultural consciousness. Like other Jadid thinkers,
Shakuri recognized that education played a central role
European International Journal of Pedagogics
36
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
in shaping collective identity. The inclusion of local
history, literature, and cultural traditions in the
curriculum was not merely a nostalgic gesture; it
functioned as a strategy to foster pride, unity, and
collective will for self-improvemen
t. In Shakuri’s works,
national consciousness did not necessarily mean an
exclusionary form of nationalism but rather a deep-
rooted appreciation of one’s heritage, language, and
cultural achievements. He believed that an education
which valued local traditions while also encouraging
open-minded engagement with global knowledge
could produce enlightened individuals, prepared to
lead their communities in a time of rapid change. In the
contemporary world
—
where cultural identities can be
submerged under the pressures of globalization
—
Shakuri’s approach resonates as a balanced way to
preserve distinct cultural values while staying
adaptable.
Beyond these broad categories
—
moral, intellectual,
practical, and cultural
—Shakuri’s discussion of
education also encompassed pedagogical methods. He
championed a departure from rote memorization
toward more interactive, student-centered methods.
This included the use of textbooks that combined vivid
illustrations and relevant real-world examples. It
involved encouraging students to ask questions,
engage in debates, and test their knowledge through
hands-on experiments or experiences outside the
classroom. He saw literacy as foundational, which is
why reading and writing skills were emphasized. Yet,
the overarching ambition was to go beyond the
mechanical mastery of letters and sounds. Students
were urged to think critically about what they read and
wrote, thereby cultivating their intellectual faculties in
a more robust manner. Even if Shakuri did not use
contemporary education
al jargon like “critical
thinking,” his advocacy for active and reflective
learning methods placed him on the cutting edge of
early twentieth-century educational reform.
The significance of Shakuri’s ideas in the modern
context is evident on multiple levels. Firstly, the
integration of moral and spiritual values within
education remains a pressing issue across the globe.
Secular school systems sometimes struggle with
questions of ethical formation, while religious
institutions often debate how best to incorporate
secular subjects. Shakuri’s balanced approach, which
sees no contradiction between faith and worldly
knowledge, offers a useful blueprint. It demonstrates
how a moral framework can function hand in hand
with scientific or practical learning, ensuring students
develop a sense of responsibility alongside intellectual
skills.
Secondly, Shakuri’s emphasis on connecting education
to real-world needs continues to be relevant today,
especially in regions where youth unemployment,
economic stagnation, or social dislocation pose urgent
challenges.
The
idea
that
education
should
simultaneously empower students with theoretical
understanding and prepare them for the workforce
retains its relevance across cultures. Shakuri’s advocacy
for practical education underscores the enduring
importance of vocational training, internships, and
project-based learning in contemporary curricula.
Thirdly, in our increasingly globalized era, issues of
cultural identity and heritage are more salient than
ever. Nations grapple with how to preserve their
linguistic and cultural uniqueness while participating in
a global exchange of ideas. Shakuri’s approach—
merging pride in one’s own culture with openness to the
broader world
—
can still guide policymakers and
educators seeking a middle path between insularity and
assimilation. His works suggest that true cultural
strength comes from a deep understanding of one’s
roots, combined with an earnest engagement with
global knowledge.
Lastly, Shakuri’s pedagogical methods, advocating for
interactive, student-centered, and inquiry-based
approaches, find strong echoes in contemporary
theories of education. Many modern reform
movements stress the need for experiential learning,
critical thinking, and creativity. In championing such
methods a century ago, Shakuri demonstrated
remarkable foresight. His recognition that a child’s
curiosity should be nurtured, not stifled, is especially
relevant in the digital age, when educators must harness
technology and new media to keep students engaged
while teaching them discernment, responsibility, and
innovative problem-solving.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, Abdukadir Shakuri’s works on the types of
education encompass moral and spiritual development,
broad academic learning, practical skill-building, cultural
identity formation, and pedagogical innovation. His
reforms were motivated by the urgent need to
modernize education within Muslim communities under
colonial rule, while retaining the core ethical and
religious values that defined those communities.
Despite the historical distance, these ideas hold
remarkable significance today. They remind us that
effective education must be holistic, weaving together
moral, intellectual, and practical elements. They
encourage the integration of heritage and modernity,
illustrating how cultural pride can coexist with global
awareness. They also reaffirm the power of interactive
pedagogy in shaping capable, conscientious citizens.
Above all, Shakuri’s legacy underscores the enduring
European International Journal of Pedagogics
37
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
conviction that education is not just about
information, but also about transformation
—
of
individuals, societies, and the shared human future.
REFERENCES
Шакури, А. Реформы в мусульманских школах
Туркестана / А. Шакури. –
Ташкент: Типография
«Усуль
-
и Джадид», 1912. –
56 с.
Саидова, М. А. Абдукодир Шакури и
его вклад в
модернизацию образования Центральной Азии /
М. А. Саидова // Педагогика и психология. –
2015.
–
№ 4. –
С. 28–
32.
Халид, А. Политика реформы мусульманской
культуры: джадидизм в Центральной Азии / А.
Халид; пер. с англ. –
М.: Восточная литература,
2010.
–
384 с.
(Оригинал: Khalid, A. The Politics of Muslim Cultural
Reform: Jadidism in Central Asia.
–
Ithaca: Cornell
University Press, 1998.)
Абдулхаев, А. А. Джадидское движение в
Туркестане: история и культурно
-
просветительская
деятельность / А. А. Абдулхаев. –
Ташкент: Фан,
2003.
–
286 с.
Мадазимов, К. М. Проблемы модернизации
традиционного образования в Туркестане в начале
XX века / К. М. Мадазимов // Вестник Ташкентского
государственного педагогического университета. –
2017.
–
№ 2. –
С.
49
–
53.
