European International Journal of Pedagogics
10
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
TYPE
Original Research
PAGE NO.
10-12
DOI
3
OPEN ACCESS
SUBMITED
08 March 2025
ACCEPTED
04 April 2025
PUBLISHED
07 May 2025
VOLUME
Vol.05 Issue05 2025
COPYRIGHT
© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.
The Technology for
Determining the Level of
Development of
Students’
Intercultural
Communication
Competence Through
Testing
Fakhriev Akbar Asadovich
Lehrkraft in Deutsch, USS Impuls gGmbH, Heilbronn/ Deutschland,
Uzbekistan
Abstract:
Intercultural communication competence
(ICC) has become a core outcome of higher education in
the context of accelerating globalization. The present
study develops and validates an integrated testing
technology designed to diagnose the degree to which
undergraduate students have formed the cognitive,
affective, and behavioral components of ICC. The
technology combines principles of psychometrics with
culture
‑
general theory and adapts them to the
sociocultural realities of Uzbekistan
’
s tertiary sector. A
mixed
‑
method sequential design was employed: first,
item pools were generated on the basis of authoritative
competence frameworks; second, the resulting test
battery was administered to 486 students representing
seven universities and nine academic majors; finally,
quantitative indicators were triangulated with
qualitative data from semi
‑
structured interviews.
Results confirm high internal consistency (Cronbach
’
s
α
=
0.91) and construct validity, while exploratory factor
analysis reveals a stable three
‑
factor structure
congruent with cognition, empathy, and interactional
sensitivity. Independent
‑
sample t
‑
tests demonstrate
significant differences between students with intensive
foreign
‑
language exposure and those without such
experience (p
<
0.01). The discussion addresses
methodological advantages of technology
‑
based
assessment, considers curricular implications, and
outlines directions for further refinement.
Keywords:
Intercultural communication competence;
European International Journal of Pedagogics
11
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
testing technology; psychometric validation; higher
education; Uzbekistan; factor analysis.
Introduction:
The twenty
‑
first
‑
century labor market
increasingly rewards graduates who can communicate
effectively across linguistic and cultural boundaries.
Universities therefore face a dual challenge: they must
embed intercultural learning into the curriculum and
they must verify that such learning materializes in
measurable competences. Yet existing diagnostic
instruments tend either to be imported without
localization or to privilege self
‑
report formats that
exaggerate proficiency. In Uzbekistan, where the state
educational standards for modern foreign
‑
language
programs include ICC as a distinct learning outcome,
demand has grown for a technology that permits
reliable, context
‑
sensitive assessment. Responding to
this demand, the present work sets out to design, pilot,
and validate a comprehensive testing technology
capable of describing students’ ICC levels with
psychometric rigor. The study is guided by the
following research questions: How can the latent
construct of ICC be operationalized within a culturally
diverse Central Asian setting? What empirical evidence
attests to the reliability and validity of the proposed
test battery? And how do diagnostic outcomes differ
according to educational profile and intercultural
experience?
METHODS
The technological concept underlying the assessment
draws on Bennett’s developmental model of
intercultural sensitivity and Byram’s descriptive model
of intercultural communicative competence, merging
them into a tripartite structure: knowledge about
cultures,
affective
‑
motivational
openness,
and
behavioral adaptability. Item generation proceeded
through systematic mapping of indicators to this
structure. Each draft item underwent expert review by
a panel of ten scholars in applied linguistics and
educational psychology. After linguistic refinement, a
pilot version comprising 84 multiple
‑
choice items and
six scenario
‑
based tasks was digitized in a secure,
browser
‑
accessed environment.
Participants represented first
‑
through fourth
‑
year
cohorts at seven state and non
‑
state universities
across
Uzbekistan.
Eligibility
required
Uzbek
citizenship, enrolment in a degree program, and
voluntary informed consent. Of 524 students who
accessed the platform, 486 completed all sections
(68 % female; mean age = 20.1 ± 1.4 years). In order to
minimize test anxiety and ensure comparability,
administrations took place during regular coursework
under the supervision of trained proctors. Average
completion time was 52 minutes.
Psychometric analysis employed IBM SPSS 28. Internal
consistency was estimated by Cronb
ach’s alpha, while
factor structure was examined via principal axis
factoring with Promax rotation (k = 3). Convergent
validity was investigated through correlations with the
well
‑
established Intercultural Development Inventory
(IDI) administered to a subsample of 148 respondents.
Group
differences
were
tested
using
independent
‑
sample t
‑
tests and one
‑
way ANOVA
where appropriate. Qualitative follow
‑
up interviews
(n
=
24) explored perceived authenticity of test
scenarios and the extent to which scores matched
students’ self
‑
perceptions. All procedures conformed to
the ethical code of the National Research Council of
Uzbekistan.
Statistical screening confirmed multivariate normality
and absence of significant outliers. The full battery
yielded Cronbach’s α = 0.
91, indicating excellent
internal consistency; subscale alphas ranged from 0.83
to 0.88. Kaiser
–
Meyer
–
Olkin measure of sampling
adequacy equalled 0.92, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity
was
significant
(χ² (3403) = 8421.76,
p < 0.001),
validating factorability. Factor analysis extracted three
components accounting jointly for 62.4 % of total
variance. The first component aggregated items
measuring declarative and procedural cultural
knowledge; the second captured empathic concern,
tolerance of ambiguity, and ethnorelative attitudes; the
third clustered behavioral indicators such as strategic
code
‑
switching and conflict
‑
mitigation techniques.
Loadings were substantial (>
0.45) and cross
‑
loadings
minimal, supporting theoretical coherence.
Convergent validity analysis showed a robust positive
correlation between composite test scores and IDI
developmental orientation scores (r = 0.71, p < 0.001).
Criterion
‑
related validity emerged from significant
mean differences associated with experiential variables.
Students who had studied abroad for at least one
semester (n = 68) outperformed their domestic peers
(M = 73.4 vs. 61.8, t (484) = 6.12, p < 0.01, Cohen’s
d = 0.78). Foreign
‑
language majors also scored higher
than STEM majors after controlling for gender and year
of study (F (2, 481) = 9.46, p < 0.001). Interview data
corroborated quantitative patterns: respondents
generally recognized scenario
‑
based tasks as realistic
and considered feedback helpful for reflection on
intercultural strengths and weaknesses.
Findings demonstrate that the proposed technology
constitutes a psychometrically sound instrument for
diagnosing ICC among undergraduate populations. High
reliability signifies stability of measurement, while
factorial
integrity
demonstrates
successful
European International Journal of Pedagogics
12
https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijp
European International Journal of Pedagogics
operationalization of the competence construct in a
Central Asian milieu. The strong correlation with the
IDI, combined with distinctive group profiles, offers
further evidence of construct and criterion validity.
Importantly, scenario
‑
based items appear to
neutralize social
‑
desirability bias by requiring
contextualised decisions rather than declarative
self
‑
evaluation.
Pedagogically, systematic deployment of the
technology can inform curriculum design by identifying
areas requiring intensified instructional attention. For
instance, relatively modest gains on behavior
‑
oriented
items
among
STEM
cohorts
suggest
that
discipline
‑
embedded international projects might be
necessary to foster practical adaptability. Moreover,
the technology
’
s digital format enables longitudinal
tracking of individual trajectories, thereby facilitating
evidence
‑
based interventions.
From a methodological standpoint, the study
contributes to assessment practice by demonstrating
how global models of ICC can be recalibrated for a
specific
national
context
without
sacrificing
psychometric
integrity.
Nonetheless,
several
limitations warrant consideration. First, despite
diverse institutional representation, the sample
remains skewed toward urban universities with
relatively strong international ties; caution is therefore
necessary when generalizing to remote campuses.
Second, reliance on cross
‑
sectional data constrains
causal inference; future research should employ
repeated
‑
measures designs to capture developmental
dynamics. Third, although qualitative interviews
affirmed perceived authenticity, further cognitive
‑
lab
studies are required to detect potential item bias
across linguistic subgroups.
The research confirms the feasibility of an integrated,
technology
‑
enhanced testing approach that reliably
d
iagnoses the development level of students’
intercultural
communication
competence
in
Uzbekistan. By combining theoretical robustness with
practical
usability,
the
instrument
offers
higher
‑
education stakeholders a valuable means of
monitoring learning outcomes and informing targeted
pedagogical strategies. Ongoing enhancement will
focus on adaptive algorithms and expansion to broader
demographic segments, thereby strengthening the
role of empirical assessment in cultivating globally
competent graduates.
REFERENCES
Bennett M. J. Developmental model of intercultural
sensitivity : theory and practice : monograph.
Portland : IDRI, 2017. 192 p.
Byram M. Teaching and assessing intercultural
communicative
competence.
2nd ed.
Bristol :
Multilingual Matters, 2
021. 320 p.
Chen G.
‑
M., Starosta W.
‑
J. Foundations of intercultural
communication. Lanham
: University Press of America,
2020. 274
p.
Deardorff D.
‑
K. Manual for the Intercultural
Competence Assessment. Durham
: Duke University
Press, 2019. 156
p.
Fantini A.
‑
E. Exploring and assessing intercultural
competence. Brattleboro
: SIT Graduate Institute, 2018.
238
p.
Hammer M.
‑
R. The Intercultural Development
Inventory
: validity and reliability. Int. J. Intercult. Relat.
2019
; vol.
72
: pp.
45
–
56.
Kolb D. A. Experiential learning : experience as the
source of learning and development. 2nd ed. Upper
Saddle River : Pearson Education, 2020. 390 p.
Ministry of Higher Education of the Republic of
Uzbekistan. State educational standard for higher
education (Bachelor level) in foreign
‑
language studies.
Tashkent
: UzME, 2022. 64
p.
Plonsky L., Gonulal T. Reliability coefficients in
second
‑
language research. Lang. Learn. 2021
; vol.
71,
no.
3
: pp.
1120
–
1160.
Sercu
L.
Assessing
intercultural
compete
nce :
perspectives and challenges. Assessment & Evaluation
in Higher Education. 2022 ; vol. 47, no. 2 : pp. 285–
301.
Shadiev R., Huang Y. The role of technology in
intercultural learning. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 2024 ;
vol. 72, no. 1 : pp. 67–
89.
Zhang H. Computer
‑
based scenario testing of
intercultural competence. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn.
2023
; vol.
36, no.
5
: pp.
975
–
999.
