Authors

  • Abdumalikova Nozaninbonu
    3rd year student of the direction “Philology and language teaching: Russian language”, Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.eijps.107681

Keywords:

Verb mood indicative

Abstract

The article explores the grammatical category of verb mood in Russian and English from a comparative linguistic perspective. It provides an analysis of the forms and means of expressing the indicative, imperative, and subjunctive moods. The study identifies similarities and differences in the structure and function of moods in both languages. Special attention is given to the morphological and syntactic mechanisms of expressing modality, as well as the challenges faced by language learners.


background image

European International Journal of Philological Sciences

18

https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijps

TYPE

Original Research

PAGE NO.

18-20

DOI

10.55640/eijps-05-06-06



OPEN ACCESS

SUBMITED

12 April 2025

ACCEPTED

08 May 2025

PUBLISHED

10 June 2025

VOLUME

Vol.05 Issue 06 2025

COPYRIGHT

© 2025 Original content from this work may be used under the terms
of the creative commons attributes 4.0 License.

Comparative
Characteristics of Verb
Moods in Russian And
English Languages

Abdumalikova Nozaninbonu

3rd year student of the direction “Philology and language teaching:
Russian language”

, Uzbekistan

Abstract

: The article explores the grammatical category

of verb mood in Russian and English from a comparative
linguistic perspective. It provides an analysis of the
forms and means of expressing the indicative,
imperative, and subjunctive moods. The study identifies
similarities and differences in the structure and function
of moods in both languages. Special attention is given to
the morphological and syntactic mechanisms of
expressing modality, as well as the challenges faced by
language learners.

Keywords:

Verb, mood, indicative, imperative,

subjunctive, modality, comparative linguistics, Russian
language, English language, grammatical category.

Introduction:

The grammatical category of mood

occupies an important place in the system of verb forms
in both Russian and English. It reflects the speaker's
attitude to the action: reality, possibility, desirability or
necessity of its implementation. Despite the general
functional orientation, the realization of the category of
mood in these two languages differs in formal, semantic
and syntactic features. The purpose of this article is to
conduct a comparative analysis of verb moods in
Russian and English, to identify their common and
distinctive features.

The mood category is related to modal-grammatical
categories and expresses the relation of an action to
reality. In traditional grammar, three main moods are
distinguished:

Indicative - the action actually occurs, has occurred, or
will occur.


background image

European International Journal of Philological Sciences

19

https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijps

European International Journal of Philological Sciences

Imperative - expresses an order, request, or advice.

Conditional / subjunctive - the action has not occurred,
but is possible under certain conditions.

In Russian, mood is expressed morphologically, i.e.
with the help of suffixes, particles and verb forms. In

English, mood is largely expressed syntactically and
relies on auxiliary verbs, modal constructions and
context.

The system of moods in the Russian language

Mood

Example

Means of expression

Indicative

He is writing a letter

Personal ending, tense

Conditional

He would write a letter

Particle would, past tense

Imperative

Write a letter!

Imperative form

The indicative mood expresses real actions and has
forms of the present, past and future tenses.

The conditional mood (subjunctive) is formed using the
particl

e біл and the past tense form: If he had come,

we would have started.

The imperative mood is used to express will: Tell me the
truth!

The system of moods in English

Mood

Example

Means of expression

Indicative

He writes a letter

Simple form, tenses

Imperative

Write a letter !

Base form of the verb

Subjunctive I

I suggest that he write a

letter.

The construction of the

type "that + be bare

infinitive"

Subjunctive II

If he were here…

Special form of the verb

(were instead of was)

The English mood includes:

Indicative - used to describe real events.

Imperative - expresses a command or request.

Subjunctive - exists in two forms:

Subjunctive I (formal style, especially in American
English): It is essential that he be informed.

Subjunctive II (conditional constructions and expression

of unreality): If I were you…


background image

European International Journal of Philological Sciences

20

https://eipublication.com/index.php/eijps

European International Journal of Philological Sciences

Examples for comparison

Indicative mood:

Russian: Не женат в туре.

English: She studies at the university.

Imperative mood:

Russian: Закрый окно!

English: Close the window!

Conditional/subjunctive mood:

Russian: И нас мне мне не как мне.

English: If I had known, I would have come

Translation and learning difficulties

Due to differences in grammatical structure, mood
categories cause difficulties for learners of both
languages. Russian-speaking students often miss the
features of subjunctive mood in English, especially in
formal contexts. At the same time, English-speaking
students have difficulty with the correct use of the
particle and imperative forms in Russian.

Thus, despite the functional similarity, the realization
of moods in Russian and English differs significantly.
Russian predominantly uses morphological means of
expression, while English uses syntactic and auxiliary
constructions. Understanding these differences is
important for both theoretical linguistics and the
practice of teaching foreign languages.

REFERENCES

Babaitseva V. V. Russian language. Theory.
Orthography. Punctuation: textbook for senior grades
of secondary school. - M.: Drofa, 2005. - 512 p.

Zolotova G. A. On the system of Russian moods. - M.:
Nauka, 1982. - 198 p.

Kobrina N. A., Korneeva E. A., Kuzmina M. I. English
grammar. Morphology. - M.: URSS, 2004. - 384 p.

Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. -
London: Longman, 1985. - 1779 p.

Huddleston R., Pullum G. K. The Cambridge Grammar
of the English Language.

Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press, 2002.

1860 p.

Komissarov V. N. General Theory of Translation.

M.:

ITDGK "Gnosis", 1999.

253 p.

Rosenthal D. E. Handbook of Spelling and Stylistics.

M.: Iris-press, 2004.

480 p.

References

Babaitseva V. V. Russian language. Theory. Orthography. Punctuation: textbook for senior grades of secondary school. - M.: Drofa, 2005. - 512 p.

Zolotova G. A. On the system of Russian moods. - M.: Nauka, 1982. - 198 p.

Kobrina N. A., Korneeva E. A., Kuzmina M. I. English grammar. Morphology. - M.: URSS, 2004. - 384 p.

Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. - London: Longman, 1985. - 1779 p.

Huddleston R., Pullum G. K. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. — 1860 p.

Komissarov V. N. General Theory of Translation. — M.: ITDGK "Gnosis", 1999. — 253 p.

Rosenthal D. E. Handbook of Spelling and Stylistics. — M.: Iris-press, 2004. — 480 p.