ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ
https://scientific-jl.org/obr
Выпуск журнала №-72
Часть–3_ июня–2025
288
2181-
3187
LAW-MAKING POLICY IN UZBEKISTAN AND SOME DEVELOPED
COUNTRIES: A COMPARATIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS
Eshturdieva Farangiz Bakhadir qizi
Institute of Legislation and Legal Policy
under the President of the Republic
of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Abstract.
A comparative analysis of the lawmaking policy between developed
countries and Uzbekistan was founded. The study examined the legal reforms
implemented in Uzbekistan after 2024 and their role in international cooperation. In
particular, the processes of developing new laws and introducing technologies were
analyzed. The differences between the lawmaking experience of developed countries
and Uzbekistan's approaches were also considered. The modernization of Uzbekistan's
legal system, reforms being implemented in accordance with international standards,
as well as achievements and shortcomings in protecting individual rights were
analyzed. The results show that Uzbekistan can use the experience of developed
countries to further improve lawmaking.
Keywords:
legal reforms, lawmaking, public administration, regulatory legal
acts, legal modernization
Annotatsiya.
Rivojlangan davlatlar va O‘zbekiston o‘rtasida huquq ijodkorligi
siyosatining qiyosiy tahlili o‘tkazildi. Tadqiqotda O‘zbekistonda 2024-yildan keyin
amalga oshirilgan huquqiy islohotlar va ularning xalqaro hamkorlikdagi o‘rni
o‘rganildi. Xususan, yangi qonunlarni ishlab chiqish va texnologiyalarni joriy etish
jarayonlari tahlil qilindi. Shuningdek, rivojlangan davlatlarning huquq ijodkorligi
tajribasi bilan O‘zbekistonning yondashuvlari o‘rtasidagi farqlar ko‘rsatildi.
O‘zbekistonning huquqiy tizimining modernizatsiyasi, xalqaro standartlarga mos
ravishda amalga oshirilayotgan islohotlar, shuningdek, shaxsiy huquqlarni himoya
qilishda yutuqlar va kamchiliklar tahlil etildi. Natijalar shuni ko‘rsatadiki, O‘zbekiston
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ
https://scientific-jl.org/obr
Выпуск журнала №-72
Часть–3_ июня–2025
289
2181-
3187
rivojlangan davlatlar tajribasidan foydalangan holda, huquq ijodkorligini yanada
takomillashtirishga muvaffaq bo‘lishi mumkin.
Kalit so’zlar:
huquqiy islohotlar, qonun ijodkorligi, davlat boshqaruvi, normativ
huquqiy hujjatlar, huquqiy modernizatsiya
Аннотация.
Проведен сравнительный анализ законотворческой политики
развитых стран и Узбекистана. В исследовании рассматриваются правовые
реформы, реализуемые в Узбекистане после 2024 года, и их роль в
международном сотрудничестве. В частности, были проанализированы
процессы разработки новых законов и внедрения технологий. Также были
подчеркнуты различия между правовым опытом развитых стран и подходами
Узбекистана. Были проанализированы модернизация правовой системы
Узбекистана, проводимые реформы в соответствии с международными
стандартами, а также достижения и недостатки в защите прав личности.
Результаты показывают, что Узбекистан может и дальше совершенствовать свою
правовую креативность, используя опыт развитых стран.
Ключевые слова:
правовые реформы, законотворчество, государственное
управление, нормативные правовые акты, правовая модернизация
Introduction
Law-making is one of the most important instruments for developing the legal
system of any state and strengthening civil society. In the context of globalization and
rapid technological advancement, the modern trends in law-making have become a
pressing issue for all nations. The legal system of the Republic of Uzbekistan has
undergone various social, political, and economic transformations throughout its
historical development. Today, the process of modernizing Uzbekistan’s legal system
is placing particular emphasis on reforming its law-making policy. Since 2024, the
legal system and law-making policy of Uzbekistan have entered a new stage within the
framework of reforms and transformations. The legal reforms implemented in the
country have introduced new mechanisms aimed at enhancing the effectiveness of the
national
legal
system
and
building
a
just
and
transparent
society.
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ
https://scientific-jl.org/obr
Выпуск журнала №-72
Часть–3_ июня–2025
290
2181-
3187
At the same time, a comparison with the law-making policies of developed countries
reveals that significant changes are taking place in Uzbekistan’s legislative process.
This article analyzes the concept and fundamental principles of law-making policy, as
well as provides a comparative overview of law-making policies in Uzbekistan and
developed nations. The objective is to examine the outcomes of the recent legislative
reforms in Uzbekistan and explore the experiences of developed countries in this field.
Materials and Methods
This research investigates the law-making policies of Uzbekistan and developed
countries. To achieve this, the study employs statistical analysis, legal document
analysis, and a review of the processes of aligning national legislation with
international
legal
standards.
The law-making practices and legislative policies of other developed nations—
particularly the United States, Germany, Singapore, and others—have been examined.
The materials analyzed include the laws of the Republic of Uzbekistan, international
legal documents, and scholarly approaches based on the academic works of legal
scholars.
Results
In the context of Uzbekistan, the implementation of legal policy in various forms
remains a matter of pressing importance. In particular, legislative initiatives, the
development of normative legal acts (law-making), their practical application,
interpretation, and the promotion of legal knowledge and culture—all constitute
practical expressions of legal policy. From this perspective, law-making is not only a
normative activity but also an essential component of political and social strategy.
It is well known that any policy, including legal policy, must manifest
externally—that is, it must be realized in practice. Only when embodied in action can
legal policy fulfill its social mission. In this regard, legal policy, being the activity of
the state in the field of legal regulation, must necessarily be implemented in specific
forms. According to L.P. Korobova, legal policy is primarily realized through law-
making. In other words, the creation of legal norms by the state is the fundamental
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ
https://scientific-jl.org/obr
Выпуск журнала №-72
Часть–3_ июня–2025
291
2181-
3187
expression
of
this
policy.
At present, however, this activity involves not only state bodies, but also local self-
governance structures and direct public participation—such as referendums, public
hearings, and other forms of direct expression of will.
This has a significant impact on the legislative process, causing legal policy to
evolve continuously: it becomes more refined, enriched, adapted to real-life needs, and
articulated
in
legal
forms
that
are
comprehensible
to
the
public.
In other words, laws and other normative legal acts represent a kind of “mirror”
reflecting the overall direction of state legal policy—highlighting not only
achievements but also shortcomings. For this reason, law-making must be viewed not
merely as the creation of legal norms but as a key tool that reveals the underlying
political views, priorities, and objectives.
Scholarly literature emphasizes that legal policy manifests externally and is
realized in practice specifically through law-making. That is, the content, direction, and
quality of legal policy can be assessed through the legal norms produced by law-
making activities. For example, in the Russian Federation, the extent to which ongoing
legal policy aligns with international legal norms and principles, as well as with the
theory and practice of building a rule-of-law state, can be evaluated based on these
normative legal documents.
However, upon closer examination, it appears that legal policy sometimes lags
behind law-making activities. In fact, the relationship between the two should be the
opposite: legal policy—particularly law-making policy—ought to serve as a
preliminary,
guiding
stage
in
the
law-making
process.
In other words, effective law-making must not only respond to existing problems but
also be guided by scientifically grounded forecasts, legal monitoring, needs
assessments, and strategic planning. This approach positions legal policy not as a
subsequent stage but rather as a prior and overriding phase of law-making.
This approach is especially relevant in the context of Uzbekistan. Law-making
should be understood not merely as a process, but as a strategically planned activity
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ
https://scientific-jl.org/obr
Выпуск журнала №-72
Часть–3_ июня–2025
292
2181-
3187
aligned with state policy. Laws created on such a basis will not only meet legal needs
but also proactively shape them in service of social development.
In our view, the most successful conceptualization is offered by S.V. Polenina,
who asserts that although legal policy may have varied definitions and forms, it is
primarily understood and accepted by society as law-making policy. This is not
coincidental. Legal policy enshrined in the preambles, definitions, and provisions of
laws and other normative legal documents is typically expressed in the clearest, most
accessible, and publicly open manner. In essence, it is through law-making that legal
policy finds its external expression and becomes embedded in public consciousness
and legal thinking.
This notion holds true in Uzbekistan as well. The population and civil society
primarily perceive legal policy through the laws adopted, presidential decrees,
government resolutions, and other normative legal documents. Thus, linking legal
policy with law-making is one of the most important means of translating political
intent into practical form.
In developed countries, the legislative process is founded on the principles of
democracy, freedom, and justice. In nations such as the United States, Germany, and
the United Kingdom, transparency and public participation are regarded as essential
components of the law-making process:
1.
In the United States
, the law-making process is highly developed and
complex. During the legislative activities of Congress, public opinion and the views of
various groups are taken into account, and broad public discussions are held on
proposed laws. The legislative system operates under a robust institutional framework,
including the "Checks and Balances" system, which ensures separation of powers
among the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, allowing each to function
independently within its own authority.
2.
In Germany
, law-making is based on clear and formal procedures.
During deliberations in the Bundestag (German Parliament), proposed laws must not
only align with state and societal interests but must also avoid infringing upon citizens’
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ
https://scientific-jl.org/obr
Выпуск журнала №-72
Часть–3_ июня–2025
293
2181-
3187
rights and freedoms. Law-making is conducted within the framework of the "social-
democratic legal state" principle, whereby laws are formed on the basis of extensive
research and public opinion.
3.
In the United Kingdom
, the law-making process is based on both
international norms and domestic legislation. The legislative system operates through
Parliament, with significant involvement from political parties and civil society.
Post-2024 reforms in Uzbekistan have aimed to ensure transparency in law-
making, enhance citizen participation, and align more closely with international legal
standards. Comparing these efforts with the experiences of developed countries such
as the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom reveals several key
differences:
•
Citizen participation
: While public and civic engagement in Uzbekistan is
developing, it has not yet reached the broad and systematic scale observed in developed
countries, where citizen input is vital to the legislative process and where laws are
discussed and voted upon through inclusive public debate.
•
Transparency in law-making
: Developed countries have achieved a high level
of transparency in their legislative processes. In Uzbekistan, additional efforts are
needed to reach similar standards—particularly by increasing the involvement of
international organizations and the non-governmental sector.
•
Compliance with international norms
: Further progress is necessary in
aligning Uzbekistan’s legislative processes with international standards. To this end,
drawing on the experiences of developed countries, fully recognizing the importance
of international law, and integrating it into national legislation is of critical importance.
Conclusion
As part of the modernization of the legal system of the Republic of Uzbekistan, law-
making policy is continuously evolving. The post-2024 reforms aim to make the
legislative process in Uzbekistan more transparent, democratic, and efficient. The
experiences of developed countries offer valuable guidance for Uzbekistan.
Simultaneously, ensuring greater public participation, reinforcing the rule of law, and
ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ
https://scientific-jl.org/obr
Выпуск журнала №-72
Часть–3_ июня–2025
294
2181-
3187
harmonizing legislation with international standards will be key to building a more
robust and just legal system in the country’s future.
References
1.
Mirziyoyev, Sh. (2017).
Ensuring the Rule of Law and Protection of Human
Interests
–
The Guarantee of National Development and People's Welfare
. Tashkent:
Uzbekistan Publishing House.
2.
OSCE/ODIHR. (2023).
Guidelines on Democratic Lawmaking for Better Laws
.
3.
Mazurenko, A. P. (2023).
Law-Making Policy (Scientific Research Experience)
(2nd ed., revised and expanded, p. 588). Moscow: Direct-Media.
4.
Mal'ko, A. V. (2008).
Draft Concept of Legal Policy in the Russian Federation
until 2020
. Moscow.
5.
Matuzov, N. I. (2003).
Legal Policy: Essence, Concept, Reality
. In:
Russian
Legal Policy: A Course of Lectures
(Ed. by N.I. Matuzov & A.V. Mal'ko). Moscow:
Norma
Publishing
House.
— See also:
Law: Creation and Interpretation
(Ed. by A.S. Pigolkin). Moscow: Spark,
1998, p. 238.
6.
Polenina, S. V. (1993).
The Quality of Law and the Effectiveness of Legislation
(Ed. by Ya.A. Kunika). Moscow, p. 56.
7.
Nagel, S. S. (2000).
Handbook of Global Legal Policy
. New York: CRC Press.
8.
Korobova, A. P. (2020). On Certain Features of Legal Policy.
Bulletin of Volga
University
Named
After
V.N.
Tatishchev
,
1(2[95]),
35–43.
https://doi.org/10.24412/Fhs_p4-tHVA
