Авторы

  • Sarsenbaev Bakhitjan Abdulgazievich
  • Kengesov Diyorbek Umidovich
  • Nurniyazova Dilnoza Arzubay qizi
  • Khalmuratova Dilnaz Suleyman qizi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71337/inlibrary.uz.esiiw.121201

Ключевые слова:

ndirect taxes tax policy state budget fiscal efficiency tax burden tax revenues shadow economy tax optimization

Аннотация

The article examines the main directions for improving the efficiency 
of indirect taxes in the process of forming the state budget. The advantages and 
disadvantages of indirect taxation, its impact on budget revenues, and the economic 
behaviour of business entities are analysed. Particular attention is paid to international 
experience in optimizing indirect taxes and the possibilities of its adaptation within the 
national tax system. The paper proposes measures to improve tax policy to increase tax 
collection, reduce the shadow economy, and ensure sustainable budget balance.


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-72

Часть–3_ июня–2025

9

2181-

3187

WAYS TO IMPROVE THE EFFICIENCY OF USING INDIRECT TAXES

WHEN FORMING THE STATE BUDGET

Sarsenbaev Bakhitjan Abdulgazievich

Associate Professor of the

Department of Financial technologies of

Karakalpak State University named after Berdakh

E-mail: bsarsenbaev83@gmail.com

Kengesov Diyorbek Umidovich

Postgraduate (Master’s level) student of

Karakalpak State University named after Berdakh

E-mail: mr.kengesov@yandex.com

Nurniyazova Dilnoza Arzubay qizi

Undergraduate (Bachelor’s level) student of

Karakalpak State University named after Berdakh

E-mail: dnurniyazova04@gmail.com

Khalmuratova Dilnaz Suleyman qizi

Undergraduate (Bachelor’s level) student of

Karakalpak State University named after Berdakh

E-mail: xalmuratovadilnaz9@mail.com

Abstract: The article examines the main directions for improving the efficiency

of indirect taxes in the process of forming the state budget. The advantages and

disadvantages of indirect taxation, its impact on budget revenues, and the economic

behaviour of business entities are analysed. Particular attention is paid to international

experience in optimizing indirect taxes and the possibilities of its adaptation within the

national tax system. The paper proposes measures to improve tax policy to increase tax

collection, reduce the shadow economy, and ensure sustainable budget balance.

Keywords: indirect taxes, tax policy, state budget, fiscal efficiency, tax burden,

tax revenues, shadow economy, tax optimization.


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-72

Часть–3_ июня–2025

10

2181-

3187

Introduction. Indirect taxes play a central role in the financial system of the

modern economy, serving as one of the key sources of government revenue. Unlike

direct taxes, which are levied on individual incomes and corporate profits, indirect

taxes are applied to goods and services, making them the foundation of consumption-

based tax systems. This characteristic enables them to generate substantial revenue

flows, significantly contributing to the stability of national budgets.

As governments strive to balance fiscal obligations with economic growth,

indirect taxes provide a flexible tool for adapting to changes in market conditions and

consumer behaviour. In addition to funding essential public services and infrastructure

projects, they also fulfil an important social function by promoting fair resource

distribution. However, the effectiveness of indirect taxation largely depends on its

structure, administrative mechanisms, and levels of tax compliance, emphasizing the

importance of sound fiscal policy and efficient management.

In this context, examining the role of indirect taxes in shaping budget revenues

becomes particularly relevant. This study aims to analyse various types of indirect

taxes, their impact on the budget system, and their broader implications for economic

stability and growth.

Literary review. In classical economic works, it was noted that taxation should be

fair, simple, and efficient [1]. Indirect taxes, such as value-added tax (VAT) and excise

duties, are considered relatively neutral instruments compared to direct taxes, as they

do not directly affect the incomes of individuals and legal entities [2]. Modern research

confirms that VAT is the most effective form of indirect taxation, contributing to the

mobilization of budgetary resources [3]. The work of B. Qadirov, examine the specifics

of indirect taxation in Uzbekistan, its impact on budget formation, and the country's

economic development [4].

Various mechanisms are employed globally to improve the efficiency of indirect

taxation. For example, in EU countries, a system of differentiated VAT rates has been

introduced, allowing for a reduction in the tax burden on socially significant goods and

services [5]. In developing countries such as Brazil and India, efforts are being made


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-72

Часть–3_ июня–2025

11

2181-

3187

to unify tax regimes to reduce administrative costs and improve tax collection

efficiency [6]. In the context of Uzbekistan, research by B. Khajiev highlights the need

for further harmonization of national tax legislation with international standards, which

would enhance the transparency of tax administration and improve the efficiency of

tax revenues [7].

Despite the evident advantages of indirect taxes, their administration remains a

complex task. Research by Bahl & Wallace emphasizes the need for tax system

modernization, the implementation of digital technologies for monitoring tax revenues,

and measures to combat tax evasion [8]. The introduction of automated control

systems, such as electronic invoices and blockchain technologies, contributes to

enhancing the transparency of the tax system [9].

Research Methodology. This study employs various methods, including analysis,

induction, deduction, and observation. Data were collected from official statistical

sources, and their processing and interpretation were carried out using graphical

analysis. This approach enabled a comprehensive examination of the subject and the

identification of key patterns.

Analysis and results. In the Republic of Uzbekistan, indirect taxation is

represented by the value-added tax (VAT) and excise tax.

Indirect taxes perform both fiscal and regulatory functions, with the mechanism

of indirect taxation being the most convenient means of generating revenue for the state

treasury. This ensures a fast and stable inflow of substantial amounts into the state

budget. In particular, indirect taxation enables economic influence by stimulating or

restricting production in certain areas and regulating consumption. Additionally, it

allows for operational responses to economic processes.

The advantages of indirect taxes are primarily linked to their role in shaping

budget revenues:

1.

They ensure a rapid inflow of funds into the budget.

2.

Since they apply to consumer goods, the likelihood of full tax collection

is significantly higher.


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-72

Часть–3_ июня–2025

12

2181-

3187

3.

Consumption is evenly distributed across regions, reducing disparities in

interregional income distribution.

4.

Indirect taxes directly affect consumers.

Currently, Uzbekistan has two types of indirect taxes: VAT and excise tax.

VAT is considered preferable to direct taxes for several reasons:

• It is harder to evade since it is more difficult to conceal taxable turnover than to

underreport or hide income.

• The VAT collection process does not involve major difficulties, reducing

administrative costs.

• VAT is not dependent on the outcomes of economic activity and provides stable

revenue inflows.

The primary function of excise taxation is fiscal, as it was originally intended to

provide the government with significant and stable sources of revenue. However, in

recent years, there has been a shift towards utilizing excise taxation as an economic

regulatory tool [10].

The regulatory function of excise tax manifests in the following aspects:

• Impact on the volume of production and consumption of excise-taxed goods.

• Influence on the structure of production, stimulating efficiency growth,

improving product quality, and enhancing consumer properties.

• Regulation of the profitability of excise-taxed goods' production.

In most developed countries, the regulatory function of excise taxation is

prioritized. The use of excise tax solely as a fiscal tool is considered undesirable in

civilized economies.

Table 1. Volume, Share, and Dynamics of Tax Revenues in the Consolidated

Budget of the Republic of Uzbekistan for 2023–2024 (billion UZS) [11]

Revenues

2023 year 2024 year Change

billion UZS Share, %

billion UZS Share, %

billion UZS %

Total 231720,70 100 274423,90 100 42703,20

18,4%

Direct Taxes 73103,60

31,55 90833,00

33,09 17729,40

24,3%


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-72

Часть–3_ июня–2025

13

2181-

3187

Corporate Income Tax

40778,90

17,60 52619,70

19,17 11840,80

29,0%

Turnover Tax 2407,30

1,04 2829,50

1,03 422,20

17,5%

Personal Income Tax

29917,40

12,91 35383,90

12,89 5466,50

18,3%

Indirect Taxes

83325,70

35,96 88342,10

32,19 5016,40

6,0%

Value Added Tax (VAT) 57885,30

24,98 59281,20

21,60 1395,90

2,4%

Excise Tax 15834,40

6,83 19059,90

6,94 3225,60

20,4%

Customs Duties

9606,10

4,15 10001,00

3,64 394,90

4,1%

Resource and Property Taxes

28079,50

12,12 36362,60

13,25 8283,10

29,5%

Property Tax 5097,70

2,20 6804,70

2,47 1707,00

33,5%

Land Use Tax

6890,10

2,97 8215,60

2,99 1325,50

19,2%

Subsoil use tax

15300,30

6,60 20169,60

7,34 4869,30

31,8%

Water resource tax 791,40

0,34 1172,70

0,42 381,30

48,2%

Other Revenues

47 211,90 20,37 58886,20

21,45 11674,30

24,7%

The table presents comprehensive data on tax revenues in Uzbekistan's

consolidated budget for the years 2023 and 2024. It details the absolute volume (in

billion UZS), the percentage share of each revenue category, and the annual change

both in monetary and percentage terms. Broadly speaking, the total tax revenues

experienced significant growth, with notable increases observed particularly in direct

taxes and resource and property taxes.

The table indicates that Uzbekistan's total tax revenues experienced a significant

increase in 2024 compared to 2023. Specifically, total revenues rose from 231,720.7

billion UZS to 274,423.9 billion UZS, reflecting an 18.4% growth. This increase was

largely driven by direct taxes, which saw the most notable expansion both in absolute

terms and in their share of the consolidated budget. The volume of direct taxes

increased by 17,729.4 billion UZS (24.3%), causing their share to rise from 31.5% in


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-72

Часть–3_ июня–2025

14

2181-

3187

2023 to 33.09% in 2024. The corporate income tax emerged as the leading component

within this group, surging by 29% to reach 52,619.7 billion UZS and boosting its share

from 17.6% to 19.17%. Personal income tax also grew by 18.3%, although its share

slightly declined to 12.89%, indicating that its growth rate was slightly below the

average increase in overall revenue.

In contrast, the indirect taxes category exhibited slower growth, increasing by

only 6.1%, from 83,325.7 to 88,387.1 billion UZS. This resulted in a noticeable drop

in its share of the total - from 35.9% to 32.1% - highlighting a relative decline in its

budgetary role. Among the indirect taxes, the Value Added Tax (VAT) remained the

largest contributor, increasing marginally by 2.5% to 59,281.2 billion UZS. However,

its share of total revenues dropped significantly from 24.9% to 21.6%. Excise tax

revenues, on the other hand, grew robustly by 20.4%, while customs duties experienced

a slight increase of 4.1%, reflecting a stable trend in foreign trade-related collections.

Resource and property taxes showed the highest percentage growth among all

categories, expanding by 29.5% to reach 36,362.6 billion UZS in 2024. This growth

lifted their share of the total budget from 12.12% to 13.25%. The most dynamic

subcategory was the subsoil use tax, which grew by an impressive 31.8%, followed

closely by the property tax at 33.5%. The land use tax and water resource tax also

registered substantial increases of 19.2% and 48.2%, respectively, signaling the

government’s increasing focus on monetizing the use of natural resources and property.

Lastly, other revenues increased significantly by 24.7%, amounting to 58,856.2

billion UZS in 2024. This category’s share in the total budget grew modestly from

20.37% to 21.45%, contributing meaningfully to overall fiscal expansion. The

consistent growth across nearly all categories, with especially strong performance in

direct and resource-based taxation, suggests an active and diversified approach to

public revenue generation in Uzbekistan’s fiscal strategy for 2024.

Figure 1. VAT receipts to the budget system of the Republic of Uzbekistan in

2012-2024, billion UZS. [12]


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-72

Часть–3_ июня–2025

15

2181-

3187

The line graph illustrates the dynamics of value-added tax (VAT) revenues

collected in Uzbekistan between 2012 and 2024, measured in billion Uzbek soums.

Overall, VAT receipts demonstrated a steady upward trend over the twelve-year

period, with occasional fluctuations, most notably during the years 2019 and 2020.

Despite these short-term drops, the general trajectory points to significant growth in

VAT contributions to the state budget.

In 2012, the volume of VAT revenues stood at 5,966.6 billion UZS. Over the next

four years, this figure grew gradually, reaching 11,891.6 billion UZS by 2016. A

noticeable acceleration occurred in 2017 and 2018, particularly in the latter year, when

VAT income more than doubled from the 2016 level to hit 27,876.5 billion UZS. This

surge continued into 2019, with a further rise to 33,809.8 billion UZS, marking a clear

shift in the scale of tax collection.

However, in 2020, the trend briefly reversed as VAT receipts dipped to 31,177.4

billion UZS. This decline may be attributed to the economic disruptions caused by the

global COVID-19 pandemic. Nonetheless, recovery was swift: by 2021, the figure had

increased to 38,439 billion UZS, followed by a sharp rise in 2022 to 52,189.4 billion

UZS, suggesting renewed economic activity and effective tax administration reforms.

The growth continued in 2023, with collections reaching 57,885.3 billion UZS, and

culminated at 59,281.2 billion UZS in 2024 — the highest point in the entire period.

In conclusion, the data reveals that VAT revenues in Uzbekistan have grown

nearly tenfold from 2012 to 2024. The trend underscores the increasing fiscal

importance of VAT in the national budget and reflects both economic expansion and

improvements in tax compliance and enforcement over the years.

Figure 2. Excise tax receipts to the budget system of the Republic of Uzbekistan

in 2012-2024, in billion UZS. [12]

The line graph illustrates the trends in excise tax revenues collected in Uzbekistan

between 2012 and 2024, expressed in billion UZS. Overall, the graph reveals a

consistent upward trajectory in excise tax collections throughout the period, with


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-72

Часть–3_ июня–2025

16

2181-

3187

particularly strong growth in the most recent years, reflecting increased fiscal

mobilization and possibly the expansion of taxable goods and services.

In 2012, the amount of excise tax collected stood at 3,175.9 billion UZS. This

figure rose steadily in the following years, reaching 4,941.1 billion UZS by 2014. From

2015 to 2017, the upward trend persisted, with revenues increasing from 5,618.4 billion

to 7,449.2 billion UZS. A more noticeable jump occurred in 2018, when receipts grew

sharply to 9,702.2 billion UZS, indicating a possible policy shift or an expansion in the

scope of excisable goods.

From 2018 onward, the growth continued at a steady pace. By 2020, excise tax

revenues had risen to 11,697.3 billion UZS, followed by a further increase to 13,086.5

billion UZS in 2021 and a marginal rise to 13,455 billion in 2022. The most substantial

increases occurred in the last two years of the observed period. In 2023, the figure

climbed to 15,834.4 billion UZS, and by 2024, it had reached a peak of 19,059.9 billion

UZS — almost six times higher than the level recorded in 2012.

In summary, the data demonstrates that excise tax revenues in Uzbekistan have

shown strong and consistent growth over the twelve-year period. This pattern suggests

the government's increasingly effective tax policy and potentially a broadening base of

taxable consumption, particularly in sectors related to fuel, alcohol, tobacco, or luxury

goods that typically fall under excise taxation.

Thus, the high fiscal and budgetary role of VAT and excise taxes in Uzbekistan's

tax and budget system is indisputable.

However, the system of indirect taxation in Uzbekistan is not without its

problems.

The first problem is that indirect taxes act as a factor restraining the growth of

domestic production and investment in fixed capital. Solving this problem requires

changes in tax legislation to encourage investment activity.

The second problem is the increase in inflation due to indirect taxation. The

optimal solution could be reducing the main and reduced VAT rates, as well as

eliminating certain exemptions from its payment.


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-72

Часть–3_ июня–2025

17

2181-

3187

The third problem is the illegal refund of VAT on export operations. To address

this issue, it is recommended to eliminate some tax benefits.

The fourth problem is related to the increase in excise tax rates, which has a

particularly strong impact on one of the state's primary tasks—preserving public health.

In this regard, the following approach is necessary: first, fostering a “drinking culture”

among the population by setting lower excise rates on less harmful products, and only

then gradually increasing excise taxes on other types of goods.

The fifth problem is the increase in excise tax on gasoline. Further raising excise

taxes on gasoline may negatively impact the prices of most goods.

The sixth problem is the complexity of VAT administration, difficulties in

justifying tax benefits and VAT refunds, which hinders Uzbek companies from

entering the global market.

The seventh problem is excessive tax burden. To achieve maximum efficiency

and reduce the load on the least wealthy taxpayers, it is necessary to lower not only the

base rate but also the preferential rate.

Conclusion. The analysis of the indirect taxation system in the Republic of

Uzbekistan allows us to draw several conclusions regarding its fiscal and regulatory

role, as well as the identified challenges.

Firstly, indirect taxes, such as Value Added Tax (VAT) and excise tax, play a key

role in shaping the revenue structure of the state budget, providing a significant portion

of fiscal inflows. Their share in Uzbekistan's consolidated budget remains high, and

the annual increase in revenues demonstrates their stability and reliability as sources

of budgetary income.

Secondly, indirect taxes influence not only the fiscal system but also economic

processes, including production, investment, and consumption. However, the identified

shortcomings—such as the discouraging effect on investment activity, impact on

inflation, and administrative complexities—necessitate measures to improve tax

policy.


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-72

Часть–3_ июня–2025

18

2181-

3187

Based on the conducted analysis, the following measures are proposed to optimize

the indirect taxation system:

1. Encouraging investment activity – introducing amendments to tax legislation

aimed at reducing fiscal pressure on domestic production and attracting investments in

fixed capital.

2. Reducing inflationary pressure – revising the standard and reduced VAT rates,

as well as possibly eliminating certain tax exemptions to enhance tax administration

efficiency.

3. Improving the VAT refund mechanism for export operations – strengthening

control over the legality of tax refunds and possibly limiting certain benefits to reduce

tax abuses.

4. Differentiating excise tax rates – setting lower rates on less harmful goods to

shape a responsible consumption culture among the population and then gradually

increasing rates on products with high social and health risks.

5. Balanced policy on fuel excise taxes – moderate increases in rates, considering

potential effects on prices and inflation, along with developing compensatory measures

for socially vulnerable groups.

6. Simplifying VAT administration – improving tax control procedures,

eliminating bureaucratic barriers, and implementing digital technologies to enhance the

transparency of tax operations.

7. Optimizing the tax burden – reviewing not only basic but also preferential tax

rates, which will help balance fiscal policy and reduce excessive pressure on taxpayers,

particularly small and medium-sized businesses.

Implementing the proposed measures will improve the efficiency of Uzbekistan’s

tax system, enhance the investment climate, reduce inflationary risks, and ensure

sustainable state budget revenues.

References.

1. Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W.

Strahan and T. Cadell.


background image

ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ НАУКА И ИННОВАЦИОННЫЕ ИДЕИ В МИРЕ

https://scientific-jl.org/obr

Выпуск журнала №-72

Часть–3_ июня–2025

19

2181-

3187

2. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: A study in public economy.

McGraw-Hill.

3. Keen, M. (2013). The anatomy of the VAT. National Tax Journal, 66(2), 423–446.

https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2013.2.06

4. Qadirov B.Q. «Direct and indirect taxation in Uzbekistan optimization basics»

Problems of modern science and education, № 7 (152), 2020, pp. 40-43.

doi:10.24411/2304-2338-2020-10701

5. Michael Keen, Ben Lockwood, the value added tax: Its causes and consequences,

Journal of Development Economics, Volume 92, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 138-151, ISSN

0304-3878, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.01.012.

6. Bird, Richard, and Pierre-Pascal Gendron. The VAT in Developing and Transitional

Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

7. Xajiev B.D. Reforming the tax system as a factor in improving distribution relations.

Economics and finance (Uzbekistan), (4 (152)), pp. 20-25.

8. Bahl, Roy, and Sally Wallace. 2005. “Public Financing in Developing and Transition

Countries.”

Public

Budgeting

&

Finance

25

(December):

83–98.

https://doi.org10.1111/j.1540-5850.2005.00005.x.

9. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Tax

administration 2021: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and

emerging economies. OECD Publishing.

10. Сарсенбаев, Б., & Алланиязова, Н. (2024). ФОРМИРОВАНИЕ

ПРОГНОЗНЫХ ЗНАЧЕНИЙ ДОХОДОВ БЮДЖЕТА УЗБЕКИСТАНА.

Экономическое развитие и анализ, 2(8), 399-404.

11. https://www.imv.uz/ - Official Website of Ministry of Economy and Finance of the

Republic of Uzbekistan.

12. https://stat.uz/ - Official Website of National Statistics Committee of the Republic

of Uzbekistan

Библиографические ссылки

Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W.

Strahan and T. Cadell.2. Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: A study in public economy.

McGraw-Hill.

Keen, M. (2013). The anatomy of the VAT. National Tax Journal, 66(2), 423–446.

Qadirov B.Q. «Direct and indirect taxation in Uzbekistan optimization basics»

Problems of modern science and education, № 7 (152), 2020, pp. 40-43.

doi:10.24411/2304-2338-2020-10701

Michael Keen, Ben Lockwood, the value added tax: Its causes and consequences,

Journal of Development Economics, Volume 92, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 138-151, ISSN

Bird, Richard, and Pierre-Pascal Gendron. The VAT in Developing and Transitional

Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.

Xajiev B.D. Reforming the tax system as a factor in improving distribution relations.

Economics and finance (Uzbekistan), (4 (152)), pp. 20-25.

Bahl, Roy, and Sally Wallace. 2005. “Public Financing in Developing and Transition

Countries.”

Public

Budgeting

& Finance 25 (December): 83–98.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Tax

administration 2021: Comparative information on OECD and other advanced and

emerging economies. OECD Publishing.

Сарсенбаев, Б., & Алланиязова, Н. (2024). ФОРМИРОВАНИЕ

ПРОГНОЗНЫХ ЗНАЧЕНИЙ ДОХОДОВ БЮДЖЕТА УЗБЕКИСТАНА.

Экономическое развитие и анализ, 2(8), 399-404.

https://www.imv.uz/ - Official Website of Ministry of Economy and Finance of the

Republic of Uzbekistan.

https://stat.uz/ - Official Website of National Statistics Committee of the Republic

of Uzbekistan