МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ
АКАДЕМИЧЕСКИХ НАУК
67
ADVANTAGES OF EARLY ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT USING
NON-REMOVABLE EQUIPMENT.
Murtazaev.S.S.
Otamurodova G.S.
Tashkent State Dental Institute.
Department of Orthodontics and Dental Prosthetics.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14203398
Introduction.
The decision on the expediency of early orthodontic treatment is still
being questioned. This is due to the poor hygienic status, the difficulty of
cooperation with patients and the ineffectiveness of treatment, since
subsequently the need to use non-removable equipment remains relevant.
Purpose of the research.
Study the effectiveness of the use of orthodontic equipment during the
period of replacement bite.
Materials and methods.
35 patients aged 6-13 years with dental anomalies were examined in accordance
with the requirements of the Ministry of Health. 15 removable devices were
used, 15 non–removable, and in 5 cases a partial bracket system was used.
Results of research.
Of the 35 patients, 9 people were treated initially using non–removable
equipment, and then teething control was carried out using removable
orthodontic equipment (1st grade). In 14 people, treatment was carried out only
using removable equipment (2nd grade). 8 people continued orthodontic
treatment using non-removable equipment during the period of permanent bite
(3rd grade). In 4 patients, orthodontic treatment was consistent using
removable and non-removable techniques, but did not lead to correction of the
occlusion anomaly, only a decrease in the degree of malocclusion was observed.
(4th gr.) Complications in the form of a violation of the enamel structure during
the use of orthodontic equipment were observed in 3 people from group 1,
which was associated with poor oral hygiene and the areas of enamel damage
did not depend on the elements of orthodontic equipment. Among the patients
of the 2nd group, enamel demineralization was observed in 2 people, 1 patient
had resorption of the root of a permanent tooth as a complication at the stage of
eruption of permanent teeth. Among the patients of the 3rd group, characteristic
chalky spots were found around the elements of non-removable equipment in 8
МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ
АКАДЕМИЧЕСКИХ НАУК
68
people. Among the patients of the 4th group of the study, 3 people had
pronounced forms of gingivitis and enamel demineralization.
Conclusions.
1.
Shortening the time of orthodontic treatment using non-removable
equipment is an advantage when choosing orthodontic devices.
2. The use of non-removable equipment in the early period of bite formation
prevents or minimizes the formation of anomalies in the position of individual
teeth and reduces the overall duration of orthodontic treatment.
List of used literature:
1. Муртазаев С.С., Арипова Г.Э., Қодиров Ж.М.,Расулова Ш.Р.,Сomparative
characteristic of the effectiveness of treatment methods for iii class anomalies
with skeletal open bite. European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine,
2020, Volume 7,Issue 2, Pages 2932-2941.
2.Kutin, G.; Hawes, R.R. The effect of early interceptive treatment in children
with posterior crossbite. Eur. J. Orthod. 1969, 56, 491–504. [CrossRef].
3. Rakosi T., Graber T.M. Dental alveolar and maxillofacial orthodontic
treatment: trans. from English. Lviv: GalDent, 2012.
4. Aripova G.E., Nasimov E.E., Kodirov M.,Dzhumaeva N.B. On the question of
methods of maxillary dilation. Scientific and practical journal "Stomatologiya".
No. 4 (81), vol. 2020. –pp. 67-71.
5. 1. G.Aripova, Sh.Rasulova, E.Nasimov, K. Akbarov. "The effectiveness of
orthodontic treatment of children with distal occlusion of the dentition during
the period of occlusion change." Domatologia, vol. 1, issue 2 (75), August 2019,
pp. 10-12,https://in library.uz/index.php/stomatologiya/article/view/1339.
